be able to guess how every engineeer codes
their own
applications and I would further guess it may fall over a little on asm stuff inline
which is
processor specific.
Sorry cannot clarify much more
John
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Brian
Is this any help to you?
Never used it personally but it was recommended to me by someone a while back after we
were
requested to add flowcharts to some documentation.
http://www.fatesoft.com/s2f/
There is always MS Visio amongst others.
John
-Original Message-
From: Brian
-Original Message-
From: Jim Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 7:54 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Multiple Displays
I'm getting ready to add a second monitor for use with DXP04
running on Win2k.
I'm hoping those with experience can
Dennis
Other than for the pure heck of it (as you say, sometimes a valid reason :-) ), what
other graphic
symbols are actually needed for a power port ?
We have bar/circle/arrow/earth
Leo, what additional symbols were you after in your original post ?
John
-Original Message-
/UltiBoard, an EDA package by a Dutch company! Which only had circle/bar power
objects as
default but you could create your own.
I am actually a bit more curious on what additional symbols are needed than the
process to do it.
John
John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
Dennis
Other than
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Molitor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 12:35 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] changing power symbols
You can edit the power symbols like this:
Get the System Menu (down arrow) and select Customize.
Right click the
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:46 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] was Shortcuts in 99SE ?
at the risk of beating a dead horse ...
i don't recall any mention in this list over the years
-Original Message-
From: RogerHead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 1:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Ver 3.x -- 99SE or DXP??
I've used Protel since the V1.1 days. We stopped upgrading
after buying a couple of licenses for 3.x, mainly because it
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:23 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
Terry,
Phillip Restall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer
but does not know of an easy way to Batch Move the
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:31 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
snip
Tom
The abilities of the DelpiScript engine exposed in 2004 is
very powerful
indeed, in fact pretty
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:49 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Licenses
That is pretty interesting data gathered here. The
interesting part is that Cadence has been successful in
trashing OrCAD
Bill
Or the seats could be like the ones I have.
I have 2 active seats of my own.
For each client that I have who specifies particular tools, I require them to supply
me with a
licensed seat of the tools (same version) as they use. For P99SE that totals 7. This
is actually in
case I ever dump
-Original Message-
From: Symanski, Jerry SPAWAR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 9:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Recommendations please! -- DXP2004 - PADS - Expedition
Gentlemen, I am currently involved in the all too familiar
task of choosing
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 10:15 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Recommendations please! -- DXP2004 - PADS
- Expedition
snip
Also, PADS will soon (September / October) have a complete
Protel
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:34 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Spice Simulation (V I) Probes on Schematic?
John,
If you are truly getting ready for retirement maybe we can
address you al old man
-Original Message-
From: Darren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 5:59 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Spice Simulation (V I) Probes on Schematic?
Joe/John,
Just curious, do you guys work from home doing contract PCB
design? This is something
?
John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
The resistance to change to the DXP platform, regardless of their
motives, has been extremely poor compared to previous
versions. One of
our policies for accepting external work is that the client should
supply the toolset of there choice to use and they must
Steve
Might not help but, have you tried exporting the DDB contents to a folder, create a
new project DDB
with a different name in it, using the windows file system (link) instead?
My memory is fuzzy but I can recall an issue where it seemed the structure of the DB
got damaged,
could be
-Original Message-
From: Abd ulRahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 5:00 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?
At 11:23 PM 5/29/2004, Ian Wilson wrote:
If you have to type sentences into a
I had dreaded a query language bashing session, Ill only add, as one of the users who
find it a
stumbling block, due to this forced use of the language as a key feature in 2004, that
I find most
things slower, not because of the application, but because I struggle with the
required skill itself
-Original Message-
From: Jim Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 5:15 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?
At 08:23 PM 5/29/2004, Ian wrote:
The 99SE global edits could be done with just the mouse, or
-Original Message-
From: Hamid Wasti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 2:47 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?
John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
For things like this I have just used the list panel as I
-Original Message-
From: Terry Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2004 6:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] Is Protel 99SE to 2004 upgrade a good idea yet?
Having just been offered a discount to upgrade from 99SE to
2004 it's time to think about it
You could try http://www.qualecad.com/
John
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] 3d viewers.
Hey Guys,
As a consumer products development company, we're continually
trying to
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:17 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] OT: Mentor PADS comparison
snip
Even with a net label on the wire, I still see a diode's pins
shorted. Yes, I have a junction
He all
I just wanted to conclude the last issues I mentioned on the global connectivity
problems I was
having with a legacy design which was 9899SE2004.
The warnings issues were a combination of a few things.
There was some net labels and ports lurking under some connections which were
Tschaggelar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 2:32 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] OT: Mentor PADS comparison
John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
What I would strongly advise is that you make a design spec, say a
small micro that flashes some LEDs, well, it may
-Original Message-
From: Nukien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:52 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] OT: Mentor PADS comparison
Hi All -
Somewhat offtopic here ... I'm currently a 99SE devout user
- we haven't made the switch to 2004 yet. I've
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 6:56 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Connectivity - Netlist issues
At 08:12 AM 5/5/2004, John A. Ross [Design] wrote:
However I made a small test board, parent + 5
Sorry Mike
Assumption is the mother of all Or so they say
Yes I assumed it was in a project :(, never tried it any other way
John
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 6:01 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:20 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Need more software
Joe wrote:
I had the same comment about being in a project, why oh why
does it have to be this way?
Yea, I
-Original Message-
From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 9:21 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Nanoboard
You could have accepted it and then sold it on this list for
$500. There are other people that want it and they won't be
PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Good schematic/PCB development suite
recommendation?
At 02:40 PM 4/10/2004, John A. Ross [RSDTV] wrote:
It is a sad fact that Altium would prefer to listen to the
'few' than
the many as regards how their tools are now styled, viewed
A quote I just seen on DXP list
Would it not be nice to be asked the same type of questions on the SCH and
PCB tools that have been the 'bread butter' for Altium for so long instead
of just the 'new Altium baby'.
When you see such feedback, well, I can only repeat myself.
I really do see the
-Original Message-
From: edsi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 6:48 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Good schematic/PCB development suite
recommendation?
snip
Altium better start to listen to folks like Ray. Ray came to
the same
For spirals you could try Brians script as well for drafting after doin
'what ifs' in the other application.
http://www.proteluser.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=17
John
-Original Message-
From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 10:18 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
' in the other application.
http://www.proteluser.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=17
John
Hey, I was just replying to that as well... You won
hitting the Send
on your email by a few seconds...
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: edsi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 7:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Component Type (Ex:2004 Global edits)
snip
Component type:
I would be willing to quiz every engineer I have worked with
for the past 30
If I understand correctly what Mike was trying to achieve by 'programming',
was handled with a few mouse clicks for selection (shift-Click in DXP for
select should have made it easier) and the T,I,P shortcut which still exists
in 2004, to select how you wanted it positioned in 99SE. It use to work
-Original Message-
From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
productivity, productivity, productivity
those are the three things that need improvement in DXP
Do you have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Common PCB footprint specifications
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [Design] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:01 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
For those of you that dont know, we are honored to have
MASTER JEDI Bill Brooks among us. Mr. Brooks was a top
-Original Message-
From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:04 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Autorouter speed, (was New PC tested with
Protel for at least 1 month now...)
Just tried out the autorouter, the example autorouter
-Original Message-
From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 12:06 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Quit Complaining!!! ( 2004 DXP Looks Great)
snip,
As an interesting side note to this discussion of the above
two
Dave
Very strange
The pasted free primitives should adopt the net names for the pads they are
dropped into, only exception I have came across is when the tracks or vias
are dropped onto a polygon or plane and seem to have adopted the polygon /
plane net instead of the pad itself.
I am working
-Original Message-
From: Dave C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 5:18 PM
To: Forum Protel EDA
Subject: [PEDA] Complex Hierarchy to PCB layout ?
Greetings Protel users,
Scenario:
Schematic design heavily based on complex hierarchy for
duplicating
-Original Message-
From: bob stephens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEDA] imported footprint
I have imported an Orcad .DSN project into DXP and need to
modify the design and re-layout the board. The imported
-Original Message-
From: Knutson, Randy Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 11:04 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] basic protel dxp questions
Hi,
I was wondering if any DXP users were on this forum because I
have a few questions that I think
-Original Message-
From: Kerry Berland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 11:11 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Orcad vs. Protel (was: Leaving Protel)
We did a custom project last year in which we were asked to
use Orcad Layout in place of
-Original Message-
From: Joe Sapienza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:34 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Toolbar File question
Ok here's one simple question beacuase I'm getting old and forgetful
If I want to tranfer my customized toolbars
-Original Message-
From: Wiper, Craig (VER) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:34 PM
To: DXP Technical Forum
Subject: Re: [dxp] Grouping parts to form Parent part
John,
Isn't there already a 'grouping' function in DXP? I thought
it was under
Phil have you checked to se if Orcad ports have been enabled?
Tools,Preferences,Scematic tab, OrCad load options, check box OrCad TM ports
should be unchecked for all sheets/projects
If it is checked it will resize port to suit text length, if you uncheck it
you might need to globally resize all
-Original Message-
From: Tom Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:26 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: [PEDA] Solder mask...
Is it ok to block open the solder mask on gull-wing i.c.'s with .4mm
AND .5mm pitches?
It seems to get enough web in
53 matches
Mail list logo
