> The match is by designator which is what you would want I assume?
yes, what else is there? :}
ds
Ian Wilson wrote:
>
> On 04:02 AM 19/03/2004, Dennis Saputelli said:
>
> >in 99SE you don't need any specific lib opened to load a
> >netlist
> >we often use orcad netlists wher NONE of the foo
On 04:02 AM 19/03/2004, Dennis Saputelli said:
in 99SE you don't need any specific lib opened to load a
netlist
we often use orcad netlists wher NONE of the footprints match any names
that we
will use
in that case we just place them as we see fit and the netlist load
succeeds
without a perfect mat
in 99SE you don't need any specific lib opened to load a
netlist
we often use orcad netlists wher NONE of the footprints match any names
that we
will use
in that case we just place them as we see fit and the netlist load
succeeds
without a perfect match
this is an appropriate working method at
I will respond to both Tony and Ian
TONY and IAN you are both right the class can be shown , with the inpector, and pcb
panel up. But not ALWAYS in less keystrokes What I have foundis ...the
inpector will not always come up with a right dialog.If it comes up blank ,you
have to l
type netname in the match attribute, 2 mouseclicks, done
DXP
5 mouseclicks, Enter
Try it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 8:21 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PE
On 02:34 PM 18/03/2004, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said:
At 04:56 PM 3/17/2004, Ian Wilson wrote:
On 08:31 AM 18/03/2004, Protel Hell said:
productivity, productivity, productivity
those are the three things that need improvement in DXP
This is an interesting comment. I don't like going back to P99SE for
True!! :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 7:16 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,buttI am having
> reservations
>
> On 01:15 PM 18/03/2004, Tony
dnesday, March 17, 2004 7:18 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,buttI am having
> reservations
>
> Tony,
> Thanks for the info you are probably right about your
> methods for netlist and text changes.
> I am not too smart, I am b
Here is an analogy. I have a router and I want it connect Points A B C
and D on a back plane in that order. I can write three lines of code to
connect them, a forth line of code to define the layer and fifth line of
code to tell it no vias or .I can take my mouse and manually route the
tr
Ian
The buttons work the keys dont
Mike
-- Original Message --
From: Ian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:29:52 +1100
>On 01:58 PM 18/03/2004, edsi said:
>>Here are few missing featur
Ian,
The buttons work, but the shortcut keys don't, they
have used the same keys twice, as in ALT O, was All
Off, now selects the Other Layers listooop's
Darren Moore
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 01:58 PM 18/03/2004, edsi said:
> >Here a
On 01:15 PM 18/03/2004, Tony Karavidas said:
Mike,
It can be done. Create you net class as you did. Then, go to the List window
and type
(ObjectKind = 'Net') AND (InNetClass('AD'))
Or
IsNet AND (InNetClass('AD'))
(a bit less typing)
Ian
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
At 04:56 PM 3/17/2004, Ian Wilson wrote:
On 08:31 AM 18/03/2004, Protel Hell said:
productivity, productivity, productivity
those are the three things that need improvement in DXP
This is an interesting comment. I don't like going back to P99SE for this
very reason. I use DXP by preference, even
On 01:58 PM 18/03/2004, edsi said:
Here are few missing features in 2004 vs 99SE PCB
Tonight's missing feature is: Option Layers, non of the short cut keys
for ALLON ALLOFF work anymore. They are supposed to work but probably
won't until service pack 2. So you have to click and pick each on
taining the
>ratsnest, routes, DRC, etc to that object. Now THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE
>
>Tony
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:26 PM
>> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
>> Sub
On 09:25 AM 18/03/2004, Mike Reagan said:
Ian
I have been using 2004 for about three weeks and have found three global
edits that the "new and improved" method can not handle. In 99SE I could
create a net class called AD. If I wanted to show only the RATS nets for
that class I could edit net AD
CTRA output is great! IT now exports net classes. This is big
> time!
>
> Mike Reagan
> EDSI
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:59 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA For
Here are few missing features in 2004 vs 99SE PCB
Tonight's missing feature is: Option Layers, non of the short cut keys for ALLON
ALLOFF work anymore. They are supposed to work but probably won't until service pack
2. So you have to click and pick each one with your freaking little mouse.
f 99SE once you get it. Try this with 99SE.
Try hiding 1 big part such as a 1000 pin BGA while still retaining the
ratsnest, routes, DRC, etc to that object. Now THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Marc
se
"Edit selected"
The first one will open a drop box and you can choose True or False.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:26 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA]
17, 2004 4:59 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> -Original Message-
> From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
> pro
eply-To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:58:43 -
> -Original Message-
> From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
;Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:58:42 -0800
I was using P99SE. It was a challenge. Also knowing what I know now, I
would
have approached the design differently
> -Original Message-
> From: Protel Hell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
> productivity, productivity, productivity
>
> those are the three things that
productivity, productivity, productivity
those are the three things that need improvement in DXP
From: "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PEDA
The American version is "Don't get your panties all in a bunch"
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Dom Bragge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:57 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
--- "Brooks,Bill"
nal Message -
From: "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> I was using P99SE. It was a challenge. Also knowing what I know n
On 08:54 AM 11/03/2004, JaMi Smith said:
The real "charge" against me, if you will, was that I instigated and lead the
"Revolt" against "ATS", and embarrassed Altium by asking questions both
here in the
PEDA Forum and in the original Yahoo! DXP Forum that they couldn't answer,
with the
result bei
- Original Message -
From: "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> I was using P99SE. It was a challenge. Also knowi
--- "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> was... but I can guarantee I won't 'get my knickers in a knot'
> worrying about it.
>
> (I just love that one... 'Knickers in a Knot'... I heard that on TV
> the other night )
Have you been watchin' Australian TV shows again Bill? You're startin
I was using P99SE. It was a challenge. Also knowing what I know now, I would
have approached the design differently and might have placed higher in the
rankings. But be that as it may, it was a good run for the money and I was
in very good company at the time too. It was back in March of 2000 at PC
y Karavidas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> What, you're speechless? ;)
>
. . .
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- Original Message -
From: "Brooks,Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> Just an additional clarification Mike,
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> On 08:17 PM 10/03/2004, JaMi Smith said:
> <..snip..>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:01 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
> For those of you that dont know, we are honored to have
> MASTER JED
At 10:08 PM 3/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you do something a lot and it used to take 5 keystrokes (or mouse
clicks) in 99SE but takes 20 in DXP, to me that is a HUGE problem. Even
if the new feature is 100 times more powerful (as in the case of the DXP's
inspector versus 99SE's global c
What, you're speechless? ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:16 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "
2004 10:01 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
For those of you that dont know, we are honored to have MASTER JEDI Bill
Brooks among us. Mr. Brooks was a top qualifier in the TOP GUN contest.
Bill, wanted to ask was the training class worth it? We ha
Untested in 2004 is the Autorouter. Since I purchased Konekt's router, I
have been using it exclusively . I still do not have pair capability but
Konekt is committed to making this feature available in the next few months.
I would be interested to hear from anyone that has tested Protel 2004
ro
like.times
UP!...
All my best and in good humor.
Bill Brooks
PCB Design Engineer , C.I.D., C.I.I.
Tel: (760)597-1500 Ext 3772 Fax: (760)597-1510
-Original Message-
From: Mike Reagan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:01 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> On 08:17 PM 10/03/2004, JaMi Smith said:
> <..snip.
Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
In my case, we upgraded a few machines to get the latest PCB and schematic
tools because the discount was available and I didn't hear too many
complaints about the DXP software on the other forum... though the asking
for help is constant... I
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> Mike:
>
> Thanks for your review of 2004. It's good to hear something positive
about
> Altium and their products, for a change. Keep us posted as to which new
> features are the best a
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Reagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> Y'all
> I started this thread and want to ass
510
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 7:53 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
On 02:08 PM 10/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Ian Wilson wrote:
>
>>I am intrigued by this. How do the p
Y'all
I started this thread and want to assure all of you that 2004 works much
better than DXP. I too closed DXP away and never opened it again. I
received the 2004 package two weeks ago, have finished 3 designs. There
are some minor bugs I have found, but overall I was up and running in tw
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 7:08 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
At 07:12 PM 3/9/2004, Brooks,Bill wrote:
>Funny, I blame Microsoft for our acceptance of software with 'bugs' in
it...
>I tell you what... If I found bugs in somethi
00 on a bad day, Protel is over an order of magnitude more
expensive.
aj
> -Original Message-
> From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 7:12 PM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
>
On 08:17 PM 10/03/2004, JaMi Smith said:
<..snip..>
BS!
Absolute BS!
Nick, Altium - You are not "giving" me anything!
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is the only person that I know that has been tossed off an Altium
forum. Some may say this is due to a conspiracy. I suspect it is due to
simple ru
t 6 months, are not entitled to what we paid for,
and not entitled to a Printed Manual.
And yes Altium, I would gladly accept your apology for treating your loyal customers
this way.
And please Abd, getting back to you, you are really not qualified to speak out on
this issue, so please don't.
Resp
On 02:08 PM 10/03/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ian Wilson wrote:
I am intrigued by this. How do the people that haven't used something
know it is not more (or less) productive than what they are using.
That one is easy to answer. Go back and read the posts again. Almost
every individual, inc
At 07:12 PM 3/9/2004, Brooks,Bill wrote:
Funny, I blame Microsoft for our acceptance of software with 'bugs' in it...
I tell you what... If I found bugs in something I bought from the grocery
store... I would take it back.
You wouldn't do that if you were hungry enough and there was no other
groce
Ian Wilson wrote:
I am intrigued by this. How do the people that haven't used something
know it is not more (or less) productive than what they are using.
That one is easy to answer. Go back and read the posts again. Almost
every individual, including me, has indicated that they actually trie
Ironic, isn't it, that this thread has been filled with sometimes harsh
complaint, while the title is as it is. I look at my mail list and see,
repeated over and over "2004 DXP Looks Great." I agree with that, as well
as with some of the criticism here.
Note that the criticism in this thread i
,
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2004 12:19 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
On 12:16 PM 10/03/2004, DUTTON Phil said:
>Bill,
>
>My DXP is still in
>the box.
<..snip..>
&
I have been through the learning curve with the beta
testing, going back 2 years, for DXP and P2004, and
I have still been using 99 also.
With the changes now in 2004 I will now move to this
new release, upgrade whatever you like to call it.
As for the manuals, they are always great, but as D
On 12:16 PM 10/03/2004, DUTTON Phil said:
Bill,
My DXP is still in
the box.
<..snip..>
There are some
good things in DXP, but there are many features that really don't seem
to help my productivity.
I am intrigued by this. How do the people that haven't used something know
it is not more (or le
Phil's comments pretty much sum up our findings, feeelings
and experience too (except we never did Mentor)
after a few whirls around our DXP is 'still in the box' too
there's just never any time to lose getting up to speed and
messing around with new ways of doing the same thing
Dennis Saputell
ds,
Phil Dutton CID
-Original Message-
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2004 10:31 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
Hmmm... my 2 cents. (that's about what it's worth...)
Bah...Protel has a following because
--Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:21 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
There is an SP3 in Beta. My understanding is that Protel 2004 includes a
lot more than SP3. There
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:06 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
John A. Ross [Design] wrote:
>shows the actual level of
>respect Altium has for its users, and they know that they will get away
>with it, because of the amount of loyalists
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> John A. Ross [Design] wrote:
>
> >
John A. Ross [Design] wrote:
shows the actual level of
respect Altium has for its users, and they know that they will get away
with it, because of the amount of loyalists within the user community
who will automatically defend them with tunnel vision.
Lots of companies have that attitude. The
Um, don't you mean P98 SP 12?
> -Original Message-
> From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:35 PM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Cc: JaMi Smith
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
>
> This is kind of what I was tr
s the new features and/or
Nanoboard (or whatever that is), could they please share their
opinions/experiences with it? And please, no Newspeak... ;-)
Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website: www.bagotronix.com
- Original Message -
From: "JaMi Smith" <[EMAIL P
rmo Electron Corporation
www.thermo.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 March 2004 14:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
In a message dated 3/9/2004 7:34:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 3/9/2004 7:34:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> After the piece of junk I
> received in the guise of DXP, they would not be seeing a dollar out of
> my pocket to evaluate a new product. I am certain that I am not the
> only customer who feels that wa
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
There is enough improvement in 2004 that the term "Upgrade" is earned.
Earned from whom? A company can call something a service pack, an
upgrade, a totally new version or a totally different product and none
of it has anything to do with reality -- only with marketing
[sigh...]
At 09:34 PM 3/8/2004, JaMi Smith wrote:
This is kind of what I was trying to address in the DXP Forum with a post
there, before Nick stepped in and totally side-stepped the issue by
telling me to go read a link.
Pesky fellow, he, distracting us from our monomanias.
People keep calling
submitted,
JaMi Smith
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> On 03:03 AM 9/03/2004, Tony Karavidas said:
>
, March 08, 2004 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> On 06:18 AM 9/03/2004, Joe Sapienza said:
> >Mike,
> >
> >You are getting me excited for when I get my copy. See what old age does,
I
> >get excited about software
From: "Mike Reagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> Joe
> Calling the shots like I see them. One thing I noticed ...because I can
> s
On 03:03 AM 9/03/2004, Tony Karavidas said:
I'm guessing they it's either a new purchase or he is paying maintenance.
Tony
This was made quite clear by Nick on the DXP list, wasn't it Tony.
Full licenses get manuals, the upgrade issued to DXP license holders
don't. At least this is what Nick Ma
On 06:18 AM 9/03/2004, Joe Sapienza said:
Mike,
You are getting me excited for when I get my copy. See what old age does, I
get excited about software.
Precious little else to get excited about ...
Ian
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMA
: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
Mike,
You are getting me excited for when I get my copy. See what old age does, I
get excited about software.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Reagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Protel EDA Forum&
ng to convince another company to switch to 2004 , it is that good
>
> Mike Reagan
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:04 AM
> To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004
on). I am trying to convince another company to switch to
> 2004 , it is that good
>
> Mike Reagan
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Karavidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:04 AM
> To: 'Protel E
vidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:04 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
I'm guessing they it's either a new purchase or he is paying maintenance.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: JaMi Smith [
I'm guessing they it's either a new purchase or he is paying maintenance.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: JaMi Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:41 AM
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Cc: JaMi Smith
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] 200
inal Message -
From: "edsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 1:48 PM
Subject: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
> Bob
> The software came by regular mail about 2 days from CA, USA. The manuals came
separat
t;
>To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:52 AM
>Subject: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
>
>
>> Hello All,
>> I received my DXP 2004 and it actually looks pretty good. It arrived with
>THIC
: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] 2004 DXP Looks Great,
Ok, so, you said that at 7:02 GMT, march 2, has your opinion changed yet?
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: "edsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Ok, so, you said that at 7:02 GMT, march 2, has your opinion changed yet?
_
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: "edsi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02,
83 matches
Mail list logo
