--On 27. April 2006 10:33:19 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 4/27/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Getting rid of ZServer is a fine goal but as long as Twisted is much
slower (from what I've heard) ZServer has to stay (ZServer is not
subject
--On 27. April 2006 00:17:18 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 4/26/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are the possible risks of those changes? What is the goal of this
branch? Integration as an optional feature or replacement of
ZPublisher/ZS
risks of those changes? What is the goal of this
branch? Integration as an optional feature or replacement of
ZPublisher/ZServer?
Andreas
pgpPTbZIkg887.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zo
--On 24. April 2006 11:59:40 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I find all these errors that Zope can't find a favicon.ico pretty
annoying. Can we put one into 2.10s root by default, or is that for
some reason a bad idea?
No objections.
-aj
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlot
with some deeper ZPT insights could have look at the
outstanding problems. Otherwise we must defer the Zope 3 ZPT integration
until Zope 2.11...any volunteers? :-)
Andreas
pgpe2aFl059Nf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev
--On 21. April 2006 18:08:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 4/21/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My ajung-final-zpt-integration branch contains a version that does no
longer require the Zope 2 TALES implementation (but uses the Zope 3
codebase
ethod.
Should we really use Zope TALES with Zope3 page templates?
My ajung-final-zpt-integration branch contains a version that does no
longer require the Zope 2 TALES implementation (but uses the Zope 3
codebase)...but
this branch needs some more work for 2.10.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co
elease.
Sure, in this particular case the issue is bug for Alec and Philipp, others
consider it a feature :-) A behavior introduced because by some
implementation bug is likely to be considered as a bug (this justifies the
change in Five 1.3.3)....
Andreas
pgpTlCCX6KjWm.pgp
Description: PGP sig
ritical
micro release. The general rule basically applies applies to really new
features. If this patch is acceptable and useful for everyone affected
(Alec?). Since I am not directly (or no more) affected by this issue others
should vote for or against this change. So we're more pragmatic than
provide an alternate
implementation with the original lookup order, and make it pluggable?
I agree that we should have a clear solution for this. I think Philipp
explained the reasons for the change when I had some trouble which the
lookup order as well.
Philipp?
Andreas
pgpfxKlgt8X4q
--On 19. April 2006 15:30:44 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'll note that I have a client who can't move forward from 2.9.1 to
2.9.3 because the changes to traversal semantics in that release break
every view lookup in the application (which was originally built on
2.8.x, and w
ere is some consensus that a proposed solution
solves the open problem. But I don't have to care about the progress of
every ongoing issue.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 -
(like "five:traversal")
that use it.
Thus, even a strict release manager might accept it.
Am I strict? :-)
Andreas
pgpUImvsRhSjW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-
d up having most of the
stuff on svn.zope.org as well...
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376
E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting
pgpHINWXWL
solution
is to write a shell script that pulls the stuff manually from cvs.zope.org.
Wouldn't it make sense to migrate the complete Products hierarchy from
cvs.zope.org to svn.zope.org?
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.co
--On 13. April 2006 11:38:38 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
Sidnei has been working on the Zope 2 publication-refactor branch where
he's allowed the use of the Zope 3 Twisted-based server, and of a
--On 13. April 2006 15:58:44 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the "big" solution would take a considerable effort. It's less
than three weeks before feature freeze. That is very little time even
for the "small" solution.
Big or small? Would this be an option
From: Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andreas Jung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: List Zope-dev
Subject: Re: z3 server+publication refactor fo
hink the "big" solution would take a considerable effort. It's less
than three weeks before feature freeze. That is very little time even
for the "small" solution.
Big or small? Would this be an optional and configurable feature or
replacement of the current infrastruct
nal feature as in Zope 3.2?
If the implementation is half-backed then it will be a show-stopper,
otherwise we need some confidence that it works as it should with breaking
something.
Andreas
--
ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany
Web: www.zopyx.com - Email:
some time.
-aj
-------
- Andreas JungZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG-
- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.zopyx.com, www.zopyx.de -
---
pgpdhrMIJiGfs.
ermail/zope-tests/2006-April/004649.html
zope-tests? I've never seen that list :-) But this reminds of that I am
missing mails from the buildbotnobody broke the the trunk/branches
lately? Unbelieveble :-)
Andreas
pgpJkV028Jox3.pgp
Description: PG
haps it was worth being discussed :-)
Andreas
pgp6n95qYMaWD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://ma
--On 27. März 2006 16:16:11 +0200 Patrick Decat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
two weeks ago, I submitted a patch against Zope-2.9.1 that makes the
'MS-Author-Via' header configurable in zope.conf (
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1441 ) but I did not hear a single
comment about it, s
problem involved and it is against the general rule for major upgrades of a
package or product for a minor Zope release..I have no opinion on this
issue...I just had this thought
Andreas
P.S. Zope 2.8.7 will be delayed so far for some days (until next weekend or
so)
pgpFnyeXV4cUM.pgp
--On 26. März 2006 14:31:25 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 66185:
update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release
Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for
--On 26. März 2006 09:58:07 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the patch (commited for Zope 2.8, 2.9. trunk). This solves at
least the import problems on my side. Unfortunately there are no tests
for export/import so fixing issues is like flying blindfolded.
Al
--On 25. März 2006 21:40:48 +0100 Yoshinori Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 25 March 2006 15:56, Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.7 throws a BadPickleGet, 12 exception, Zope 2.8 throws
BadPickleGet, 13 and Zope 2.9 raises the described UnicodeDecodeError.
I don't expe
--On 25. März 2006 13:14:06 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
FileSystemSite
This is a repackaging of the CMF's FileSystem Directory Views such
that it is independent of the CMF.
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such
t be useful to perform any processing outside Zope but
using it for re-importing it into another Zope systems definitely does
_not_ work. So if the functionality should remain in Zope then it should
be fixed
for Zope 2.10 lately.
Andreas
pgpDsKQKSvaGQ.pgp
Description: PG
essary).
Andreas
---
- Andreas JungZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG-
- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.zopyx.com, ww
te ZClasses as an
implementation solution to co-workers. ZClasses will stay for the time
being but they should be regarded as a bad solution for new projects.
-aj
---
- Andreas JungZOPYX L
-aj
---
- Andreas JungZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG-
- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.zopyx.com, www
Rails is better, in some cases Zope3 is better".
Different situations require different choices.
This brings us back to the old discussion where we want to go with Zope in
the future and what our target audience for Zope should/will be. I have
some clear thought on that but that's
--On 24. März 2006 18:09:36 +0100 Yoshinori Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 24 March 2006 17:33, Andreas Jung wrote:
>> - it has no maintainer, nobody wants to touch it without gloves
>
> Is that any more true than for lots of other things?
Right, but for dupli
y the largest problem in the Zope 2
world right now. I do also prefer to spend my time on more interesting
projects in the Zope world than digging through ancient, scary code.
Andreas
-------
- Andreas JungZOPY
knows about
the deepest internals.
Andreas
pgps7hMOuKggA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zo
?
Your time and our time is very much limited. We should spend this time
on useful Zope projects and not in supporting ancient concepts that don't
help the majority of the Zope developers.
Andreas
---
- Andreas Jung
--On 24. März 2006 11:07:06 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope supports the export of content either through Python pickles
(.zexp) or as XML. Unfortunatly the XML export/import has several
problems:
- the generated XML is pretty much too low-level
ort/import.
Comments?
Andreas
pgpWVI8dK9rj4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/lis
As announced earlier I plan to release Zope 2.8.7 and 2.9.2 by
next Monday...so as always: any pending fixes should be commited
until Monday.
Andreas
pgpnNv3KkZAp4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http
--On 14. März 2006 21:14:33 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
lib/python/App/Product.py contains code that deals *somehow* with
"distributions" (whatever this means). Does any one know what this code
is doing?...anyway this code uses the Python rotor module whic
It seems to be ZClasses relatedso it can go :-)
--On 14. März 2006 15:40:55 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what this code is. But I've never used it or seen
anyone else use it. I suspect it can go.
- C
On Mar 14, 2006, at 3:14
lib/python/App/Product.py contains code that deals *somehow* with
"distributions" (whatever this means). Does any one know what this code
is doing?...anyway this code uses the Python rotor module which was
removed in Python 2.4. This code is a clear candidate to be kicked...
objections?
-aj
pgpX
Due to some changes in my email configuration I would like to use
another email address for checkin notifications email other than the
current one. Is there a way to configure this on my own or do I have to
beg before the svn admistrator?
Thanks,
Andreas
pgpxckMy3h2Un.pgp
Description: PGP
I plan to release the next Zope versions around March 28. The release will
basically contain newer Five versions.
-aj
pgpH0qawTOb9h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-d
one needs to be Manager to upload content to the Products area on
zope.org. I would give the new window maintainer a local Manager role in
this case...so who is willing to care about the future Windows build? I
would like to see a longer commitment for this job.
Thanks,
Andreas
p
--On 28. Februar 2006 21:41:24 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
-if name[0] == '_':
+if name.startswith('_'):
Just a question: Is this only a matter of stylistic changes, or is
there some, like, speedup invol
--On 28. Februar 2006 10:31:04 -1000 Christopher Lozinski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am considering volunteering to rewrite ZClasses.
Who do I speak to?
You can basically start this as your own project. Starting Zope 2.10
are officially deprecated. Any new development for Zope 2 and 3
--On 28. Februar 2006 16:06:55 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think focusing on one app server and a dedicated set of libraries
would be a good alternative to two concurring app servers.
+1
-aj
pgpe9Th17c7O9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n Zope 2. I still do not see that Zope 3 will provide
everything we need to build large-scale applications. Having CMF 2.0 and
having some future Plone version running on top I don't see that Zope 2
will fade out.
Andreas
pgpZGgNEj4Wvt.pgp
Descriptio
--On 23. Januar 2006 21:37:10 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am plan to release Zope 2.8.6 and 2.9.1 in the middle of February
(around Feb, 15th).
Unfortunately I am currently too busy to do any releases right now. There
are also some bug reports pending that sho
done
--On 21. Februar 2006 08:00:47 +0100 robert rottermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. Januar 2006 21:37:10 +0100 Andreas Jung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am plan to release Zope 2.8.6 and 2.9.1 in the middle of February
(around Feb, 15th).
U
--On 23. Januar 2006 21:37:10 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am plan to release Zope 2.8.6 and 2.9.1 in the middle of February
(around Feb, 15th).
Unfortunately I am currently too busy to do any releases right now. There
are also some bug reports pending that sho
--On 10. Februar 2006 18:06:53 +0100 Jean-François Roche
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I can't find the Introspector package in zope.app in 2.9 (Zope shipped
with Zope-2.9.0.tgz) but can find it on svn. Forgot something ? Can you
help? Thanks!
This will be fixed in 2.9.1.
-aj
pgpq
--On 5. Februar 2006 12:11:08 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A while ago, we had some discussion on when to make releases and
how long to support deprecated features. The discussion has died down
so I'll summarize what I think the conclusions were:
- We'll move releases up one
--On 3. Februar 2006 23:22:00 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Beat Rubischon wrote at 2006-2-3 14:10 +0100:
Until Zope 2.8.3 it was possible to access to the name of the logged in
user also in a public accessible method.
..
This no longer works in Zope 2.8.5 (2.8.4 is unteste
I am plan to release Zope 2.8.6 and 2.9.1 in the middle of February
(around Feb, 15th).
Cheers,
Andreas
pgp4CgZl6DpmQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
--On 20. Januar 2006 10:03:03 + Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
set' set.
A cool :-) Where's the code that checks if this header is present so I
can take a look?
ZPublisher/HTTPResponse.py (where else :-))
Oh :-S
I was expecting a different patch... so this only affects c
--On 19. Januar 2006 18:37:35 + Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Ah, okay, and how would I indicate in my PythonScript return that I'm
returning something different to what is specified in
zpublisher_default_encoding?
By setting the content-
--On 18. Januar 2006 10:31:03 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
The basic problem with the windows release is that there is currently
nobody in charge for the windows release (although Tim is again doing
working on the Windows side, ALL HAIL TIM).
--On 18. Januar 2006 07:36:35 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the future, if someone introduces a major change, they *must* be
committed to be available to deal with issues that arise during the
release cycle. Perhaps we need to pick different release dates to
avoid holidays.
--On 16. Januar 2006 13:36:32 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are two separate issues here:
1. ZPT backward compatibility.
Are we introdcuting ZPT backward incompatibilities? (Aside from module
paths)?
My original implementation would introduce incompatibilitie
--On 16. Januar 2006 13:08:31 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll just note that:
- I agree with your point about deprecation warnings. IOW
we should not check in new deprecation warnings on the trunk
that cause warnings to be output when running the standard tests.
We s
--On 13. Januar 2006 13:25:19 +0100 Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Thoughts?
All these changes seem to be the right thing. This will make unicode life
in Zope a lot easier.
I worry about backward compatibility though.
Some code (s
--On 10. Januar 2006 12:20:14 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This means basically keeping zLOG since it is only a very thin logging
module wrapper. So why did we deprecate zLOG? :-)
Did we? It was impl
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:44:31 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't have an opinion on solution yet.
What I want is something easy to use wher you can just import a log
method or object and make a function. I don't want to set things up,
because if we need to set things up
--On 10. Januar 2006 11:09:32 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 1/10/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
How do you mean? As far as I can see, all the levels are still there in
--On 10. Januar 2006 10:51:04 +0100 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I find all this fairly self-evident and highly useful, and se
absolutely zero reason for removing them, when they are so useful.
This decision was made for Zope 2.8 (according to zLOG/__init__.py).
We're now wor
--On 9. Januar 2006 20:06:09 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>
We'll have to check that. Support in terms of patches are welcome :-)
The Zope specific interface for logging purposes is already there:
You just want to deprecate and remove it.
_We_ want to _cleanup_ things. The cu
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:40:26 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 Jan 2006, at 17:25, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:06:25 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My point is that the python logging levels are insufficiently fine
grained.
Sufficently enough for me. BLATHER & TRACE can be merged to DEBUG
and PROBLEM to either WARN|ERROR. This should be even enough for Zope.
--On 9. Januar 2006 17:00:13 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 41225:
Sanely deprecate StructuredText by making it a facade of
zope.structuredtext.
Just to make sure: we didn't lose the "ReST allowed arbitrary f
--On 9. Januar 2006 10:55:21 -0500 Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/9/06, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZODB defines these levels but I can not see any code in the ZODB package
that actually uses these levels.
Nobody should be using the zLOG levels with
--On 9. Januar 2006 16:35:31 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If that is the case then I intend to:
1. move the definitions of zope's specific levels (trace and blather)
into a more prominent place (ZODB also defines these levels, but it has
to be an independent package),
--On 8. Januar 2006 17:49:01 -0500 Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does the twice-annual release policy say about bugs and/or packaging
errors that are identified and fixed within a very short time of the
official release announcement?
huh? I don't understand. Bugfixes will b
--On 8. Januar 2006 20:58:19 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-8 11:44 +0100:
the zLOG module will be offically deprecated in Zope 2.10 (removed in
Zope 2.12). New code _must_ use the 'logging' module of Python. And
please hel
Hi all,
the zLOG module will be offically deprecated in Zope 2.10 (removed in Zope
2.12). New code _must_ use the 'logging' module of Python. And please help
to replace all outstanding code that uses the zLOG module on the _trunk_
(which is a fun job :-|).
Thanks,
Andreas
pgplAWT
--On 6. Januar 2006 10:49:29 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't like using tags in externals. Each time an external is changed
to a tag,
svn creates .OLD directories and gets a new version. It's a real hassle
IMO.
I _like_ tags in externals because they are self-documenting
--On 6. Januar 2006 19:55:56 +0900 TAHARA Yusei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've tried to the branch and I found a typo in zope.conf.
I think default-zpublisher-encoding is a correct directive name.
This is already fixed.
By the way, I have a request related to this changes.
If the root
--On 5. Januar 2006 21:12:08 +0100 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>
- allowing only unicode textual content when calling macros, PyScript
etc.
definitely not.
I know that this is a hard requirement but it is an implicit requirement in
Zope 3.
- converting non-unicode to unicode in
--On 5. Januar 2006 17:36:45 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
ToDo: in-place conversion of persistent ZPT instance through setstate()
or so...
Could we avoid doing things in __setstate__ please? It imposes a runtime
cost that doesn't disa
--On 5. Januar 2006 12:47:20 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As you might know I worked on the integration of the Zope 3 ZPT
implementation for Zope 2.10. Before commiting the changes to the trunk I
would like discuss my approach for Zope 2.10
I forgot to mention a
iso-8859-15. I think it would make sense to change it to
utf8. Otherwise we must explicitly set the content-type with
charset=utf8 set. Thoughts?
ToDo: in-place conversion of persistent ZPT instance through setstate() or
so...
Andreas
pgp5yexs8WBFr.pgp
Descri
--On 4. Januar 2006 11:23:09 +0200 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
No. Imagine a PythonScript that returns a unicode string. The ZPublisher
converts the unicode string to latin1 (zpublisher_default_encoding). Most
browsers will default Latin1 when they
--On 25. Dezember 2005 18:48:22 +0100 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
The top-level directory structure on svn.zope.org appears a bit messy to
me. There we have the folders for the "large" projects CMF, Zope, Zope3
and lots
modul
--On 26. Dezember 2005 14:49:07 -0500 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
on behalf of Zope Corporation and the Zope community I am pleased to
announce the release of Zope 2.9.0 beta 2 (the x-mas release)
Than
--On 23. Dezember 2005 19:28:52 + Chris Withers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The HTTP spec says that a http server *can* set the charset to make the
encoding of the payload clear. That's what we are doing now. Not
specifying the charset means for the browser: *guessing* the encoding
which m
--On 25. Dezember 2005 12:48:38 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi all,
Just got finished migrating the main repository on svn.zope.org away
from the old BDB backend to a FSFS backend. Some quick tests show me
that everything seems to be in order, including sending of commit
--On 23. Dezember 2005 12:06:06 +0100 Florent Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm in the middle of debugging important session machinery problems with
the current zope 2.9 branch.
(ReadConflictErrors happening when everything should be mvcc).
Could the 2.9b2 release please hold until
--On 22. Dezember 2005 12:44:23 -0330 Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, if we simply suck sqlite in as a build time requirement (during
the 'make' process) do we care about importing non-ZPL code into
svn.zope.org? We would only care about licensing when distributing
binaries tha
--On 22. Dezember 2005 10:46:42 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
What do Java people expect from jar files (I ask as a Java dope)? Do
they have a more limited scope (no dependencies, for example?)
Jar files have no dependencies.
-aj
pgpKlIVHcdQM0.pgp
Description: PGP sig
--On 22. Dezember 2005 11:42:30 -0330 Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
When you mentioned before about importing sqlite into svn.zope.org, you
were talking about actually including a snapshot of sqlite inside zope
source rather than making it a build time requirement?
I really don't c
--On 22. Dezember 2005 09:48:01 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
AFAIK, there is no Data.fs.in file anymore and the "OFS.Application"
logic creates all the objects it needs at startup time.
Quickstart text is in lib/python/App/dtml/zope_quick_start.dtml (it's
not read from Z
Chris,
what do you think about moving the current version of the ZB hosted on
plope.com back on zope.org. The quickstart page of Zope still points to the
2.6 edition. I would like to get of the 2.6 edition and call it just "Zope
Book" + the data of the last modification. Since we can not synch
--On 22. Dezember 2005 15:20:27 +0100 robert rottermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I perfectly agree with both of these arguments.
However having a "dead easy to use" RDBMS tool is very convenient. Both
for teaching and marketing purposes.
I agree (meanwhile) but we have to sort out the
Does anyone know how to modify the bootstrap Data.fs that is installed after
a new Zope installation and how to modify the Zope Quickstart page?
-aj
pgpOQIS1FhaaI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.
--On 22. Dezember 2005 09:09:02 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The question is this: do you think there should be an explicit "install"
step for egg packages/Products or do you think it should be possible to
just put eggs on your PYTHONPATH (and perhaps adjust a config
--On 20. Dezember 2005 16:41:37 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Dec 20, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
But I'm not sure I understand you.
Are you saying that in order to use Basket, my product can't call
registerHelp()?
Or are you saying that when installed via B
--On 22. Dezember 2005 12:32:07 +0100 Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I dont think we should inlcude more 3rd party products into zope core
unless they are required for core funtionality. And a random database
adaptor isnt really core functionality.
Another point: with Zope 2.10
701 - 800 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
