On 2002-02-16 at 1458.02 +0100, Eddy De Greef typed this mail:
> I hope this can be fixed, because I'd rather not pull
> the complete tarball through my phone line.
>
perhaps a better option would be to get your Stable GIMP from the CVS
repository. true, it is initially a big download, but afte
On 2002-02-17 at 1219.46 +0100, Rebecca J. Walter typed this mail:
>
> Also we will need a howto on the web site about making the different
> window managers play nice with gimp.
>
I have two screenshots showing how to fix Sawfish to play nice with
GIMP. I stored them here:
http://carol.gimp.or
hmm, me again.
On 2002-02-13 at 1539.15 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 2002-02-13 at 0058.58 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> > >
> > > I'd also like to remove TODO.xml
On 2002-02-18 at 1742.06 +0100, Raphael Quinet typed this mail:
>
> Well, although I still cannot use CVS and therefore cannot edit the
> TODO file, I can at least help converting its contents to a bunch of
> bug reports. I know bugzilla quite well and I know what has already
> been reported (to
tonight i decided to try the cvs gimp-1.3. i found it very difficult to
convince the cvs server that i wanted the new gimp now, having followed
bex's how to for the stable gimp.
eventually i renamed the gimp directory and was able to successfully
check it out, it seems like there should be a mor
On 2002-03-04 at 1138.18 -0500, vio typed this mail:
>
> I managed to put my hand on a "Net-Fu" package.
> Yes, that is what I was talking about. I wonder if this code
> is still maintained by anyone, because what I got had a 1997 timestamp.
> I hope the authors won't mind, but if I can manage to
On 2002-03-04 at 1138.18 -0500, vio typed this mail:
>
> A good analogy would be with
> Dell's 'direct' distribution model: a Dell computer is assembled only "after"
> a customer has placed the order for it. Same here: Gimp assembles the pixels
> for the image only "after" the server has received
can someone help this guy?
carol
- Forwarded message from John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: John Culleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Gimp-user] Installing xsane plugin
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:52:50 -0500
I guess I must keep
here is a question from the user list. since i have used gimp to work
with eps files before, i got one of the images and tried to open it. my
gimp-1.2 failed also. any ideas?
the image i downloaded and unzipped is located here
http://carol.gimp.org/files/TORG_illustration.eps
thanks,
carol
O
On 2002-04-06 at 2157.42 +0200, Peter Kirchgessner typed this mail:
> Hi Carol,
>
> EPS-files require an additional showpage command submitted to
> ghostscript. This is usually done by the ps-plugin. But these binary
> PostScript files (I have never seen before) are not recognized as
> EPS-fil
On 2002-04-09 at 1705.32 +0200, Branko Collin typed this mail:
> On 9 Apr 2002, at 16:42, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > probably nothing... Could you help my leaky brain by pointing me to
> > the respective bugzilla number? Or did we already apply the patch?
>
> I did not submit it to Bugzilla, because
On 2002-04-11 at 1255.35 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
>
> ...they just stop leaving a forwarding e-mail address :)
>
> Following on from the other plug-in discussion, can anyone tell
> me what the procedure is for updating old plug-ins which were
> added by someone who is now (apparrently
On 2002-04-11 at 1718.41 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i have been wanting to collect all of the working plug-ins and make them
> > available on my site. only plug-ins that are not already i
On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> well, then the registry needs to be improved. Did you contact Ingo and
> offered your help?
>
> > what could be so bad with a place to collect the updated plug-ins?
>
> nothing. The bad thing is to have multiple places to l
On 2002-04-11 at 1735.06 +0200, David Neary typed this mail:
>
> "work" is overstating it :) In fact I just found out about
> ENABLE_GIMP_COMPAT_CRUFT, and essentially all I did was to make
> a couple (psd_save and DigitalSignature) of 1.0 plug-ins compile
> without it. It's basically search-and-
On 2002-04-11 at 1834.02 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this mail:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:01:03 -0400, "Carol Spears" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2002-04-11 at 1741.53 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> > > nothing. The bad thing is to have mu
hi. even though it says it wants to know about interactive or not, it
really doesn't want to know. i think that non-interactive is assumed.
at least that is how it worked with perl-fu.
there is a call extension-screenshot that has gimp call xwd for you. i
don't know if this is better or not.
On 2002-06-06 at 2209.02 -0700, Philip Brown typed this mail:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:02:35AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
> You did not mention, however, why pkgconfig was suddenly added to
> gimp1.3.7, when it was not neccessary for gimp1.2.x
>
probably you should stick with the stable b
On 2002-06-09 at 1304.03 +0200, Sven Neumann typed this mail:
> Hi,
>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Scripsit Akkana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > http://shallowsky.com/gimpbuild.html
> >
> > Cool. You say on that page:
> >
> > | for some reason, CVS builds have more
On 2002-06-12 at 1514.45 -0400, Mario J. Borgnia typed this mail:
> Hi,
> I currently work with special image formats used in electron microscopy.
> I would like to be able to open, manipulate and save those files using
> The Gimp. Could anybody give me some pointers on how get started writing
> i
hi :)
On 2002-08-31 at 1134.05 -0500, Cindy Huyser typed this:
>
> /usr/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start':
> /usr/lib/crt1.o(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
> /usr/lib/libgimp.so: undefined reference to `PLUG_IN_INFO'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
i don't know about the c plu
hi.
i am in need of a document, titled "About The GIMP". i started at the
current gimp web site and stole the attached text. any thoughts on
this?
thanks,
carol
About The GIMP
GIMP is an acronym for GNU Image Manipulation Program. It is a freely
distributed piece of software suitable fo
heya Branko,
On 2002-09-21 at 2328.10 +0200, Branko Collin typed this:
> On 21 Sep 2002, at 11:10, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > i am in need of a document, titled "About The GIMP". i started at
> > the current gimp web site and stole the attached text. any thought
On 2002-09-22 at 0142.55 +0200, Branko Collin typed this:
> On 21 Sep 2002, at 19:18, Carol Spears wrote:
> > > On 21 Sep 2002, at 11:10, Carol Spears wrote:
> > >
> > > > "About The GIMP"
> > Yes, this is the text from the current web site. i
On 2002-10-14 at 1337.06 -0500, Kevin Myers typed this:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "gimp users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 10:23 AM
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Threshold Crop Plug-in
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like t
well, i use it. honest. Robin, ever try to write a gimp plug-in?
carol
On 2002-11-26 at 1436.28 -0800, Robin Rowe typed this:
> Simon,
>
> > It enables powerful searches over the various help texts plugins provide
> > via their Registration. I surely do not understand why having this
> > featur
this is such a good topic for a tutorial! i needed help to see this
stuff at first as well. i don't have time to write the tutorial, but i
got some screenshots for it when i have the time.
i have been working with gimp-python lately, so i chose that console for
my tutorial. the script fu consol
hmm ...
On 2002-11-27 at 1319.11 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > this is such a good topic for a tutorial! i needed help to see this
> > stuff at first as well. i don't have time to write the tutorial,
On 2002-11-28 at 1259.18 -0500, Patrick McFarland typed this:
> Hrm. Side note, They got $1k from Linuxfund to further their project... hrm...
>
$1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
carol
__
Robin ...
On 2002-12-01 at 0842.07 -0800, Robin Rowe typed this:
> Carol,
>
> > $1k would not be enough to by the beer for the people who develop The
> > GIMP (if i can at least add correctly).
>
> It's true that $1k isn't generally considered a lot of money in funding a
> software project, but I
i was using data/images/eek.png on my desktop. now it seems to be
missing.
is it gone forever?
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Sven, thanks
On 2002-12-04 at 1918.31 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi Carol,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i was using data/images/eek.png on my desktop. now it seems to be
> > missing.
>
> I guess you refer to themes/Default/imag
On 2002-12-04 at 1831.12 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> >From the list on www.gimp.org, the only developers who are still active
> are Sven Neumann (neo in CVS logs), Michael Natterer (mitch) and Manish
> Singh (yosh). The other people listed there haven't contributed much in
> the last month
On 2002-12-05 at 1320.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On 05 Dec 2002 12:42:28 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However I don't think we want to build this file automatically from
> > CVS. We often apply patches from people that don't have CVS commit
> > access. I'd like to
On 2002-12-05 at 1759.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:20:28 -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2002-12-05 at 1320.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> > > On 05 Dec 2002 12:42:28 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> A Fairly Good List of GIMP Contributions:
> --the last 10 or the last 24 hrs of entries would be interesting--
>
> from gnome annoncvs (updated once daily):
> gimp ChangeLog
> gimp-1-2 ChangeLog
> gimp-help ChangeLog
> gegl ChangeLog
> from sourceforge anoncvs (need info on
On 2002-12-03 at 1839.16 -0800, Jonathan Cohen typed this:
> Hi,
>
> That said, the software engineer in me is slightly saddened by the fact
> that we are duplicating (some) efforts from the gimp programmers. I'm
> sure most of what is on our todo list is on the gimp's todo list as well
> (or has
On 2002-12-06 at 0001.06 -0800, Robin Rowe typed this:
> Carol,
>
> You work? Didn't you say you don't believe in money, that you oppose on
> principle open source developers being paid?
>
> Pardon my curiosity. Are you working for free? What do you do?
>
i sell groceries for a small family owne
On 2002-12-06 at 1454.37 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> pleas excuse me if I missed something but IIRC I'm even subscribed to
> the gimp-web list and in the last months I haven't heard anything
> about the stuff you are talking about. There has been rumours about
> work being done on th
On 2002-12-06 at 1454.37 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
> well, using AUTHORS is probably a bad idea since it is the ASCII-only
> version generated from the file contributors which also has UTF8
> encoded names. I'd really like to replace this mess by something saner
> and I was hoping that
On 2002-12-06 at 1516.57 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On 06 Dec 2002 14:54:37 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > pleas excuse me if I missed something but IIRC I'm even subscribed to
> > the gimp-web list and in the last months I haven't heard anything
> > about the stuff you
On 2002-12-06 at 1526.22 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> It looks like there was a misunderstanding about what you were trying to
> do. The discussion started around an attempt to get an updated version
> of the list of GIMP contributors. When you posted your questions and
> proposal, I though
On 2002-12-06 at 1320.24 -0800, Nathan Carl Summers typed this:
> On 6 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > well, using AUTHORS is probably a bad idea since it is the ASCII-only
> > version generated from the file contributors which also has UTF8
> > encoded names.
>
> Actually, it reads contributors
On 2002-12-12 at 0922.22 -0800, Robin Rowe typed this:
>
> You seem to want to foster the misimpression that GIMP is all just one big
> project centrally administered.
>
i for one look for the berkeley seal of approval on things
carol
___
Gimp-d
Hi back,
On 2002-12-13 at 1741.32 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> "Matthew Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > After some research, I've discovered some things about fonts, gimp,
> > and linux. (Some of this may be old news to many of you, but it was
> > new to me because I'm not a
On 2002-12-19 at 1759.28 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 12:19:28 -0800 (PST), Nathan Carl Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The gimp web team has desired that the current FAQ's be updated to reflect
> > the current 1.2.x reality for some time.
>
> Sorry to rehash a to
On 2002-12-20 at 1314.01 +1100, Tim Lambert typed this:
> "Stephen J Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > My #1 FAQ from people where I work is:
> >
> > Q: I'm trying to paint and nothing is happening - what did I
> > do wrong?
>
> Yeah, me too. How hard do you think it would be t
On 2003-02-09 at 1154.57 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> I think it is about time to think about updating the Tip of the Day
> messages for GIMP 1.3. A few of them are incorrect and probably the
> new user interface makes some new hints necessary. The tips are
> organized in an XML file
On 2003-02-10 at 1710.28 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:16:56 +0100, "David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
> As someone who still has to use Netscape 4.x from time to time (old
> computers, not enough memory to run newer browsers), I would like to
> be abl
On 2003-02-10 at 1337.37 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
>
> I see that the footer of the sample page that you provided includes a
> reference to "The GIMP Team". I don't know how others feel about
> that, but I do not like to give credits on every page of the site.
> The GIMP itself does not i
On 2003-02-10 at 2017.52 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:26:47 -0500, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2003-02-10 at 1337.37 +0100, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> > > I see that the footer of the sample page that you provided inclu
On 2003-02-26 at 2143.29 +0100, Branko Collin typed this:
> On 26 Feb 2003, at 10:30, Valter Mazzola wrote:
>
> > i'm executing this line in gimp 1.2.3 Script-Console , linux Mandrake
> > 9.0 intel:
> >
> > => (script-fu-alien-glow-logo 0 "hello" "150"
> > "-*-utopia-bold-r-*-*-150-*-*-*-*-*-
On 2003-02-28 at 0102.48 +0100, Marc A. Lehmann typed this:
>
> I really wonder what is going on here, but there is a great deal of
> confusion and misinformation going on...
>
i miss the perl plug-ins in gimp-1.3.
are the developers, like me, waiting for someone to make gtk2 perl work?
carol
On 2003-02-26 at 1956.05 +0100, Sven Neumann typed this:
> Hi,
>
> when I saw your mail, I remembered that I haven't yet told you that we
> finally moved gimp-perl out of the gimp HEAD branch into its own CVS
> module called gimp-perl. Hoepfully someone will find the time to
> resurrect its functi
hi, i sent this to the web list. thought i would pop it off here as
well. anyone who wants to help to tidy up the how tos mentioned here is
more than welcome to help.
would be nice to have how to get stuff from cvs for windows also.
carol
- Forwarded message from Carol Spears <[EM
are there any plans to make guash work in 1.3.
i don't run gnome. the nautilus available for testing is buggy i guess.
it is running right now on my computer, yet i cannot see it.
it seems like a lot of crap to get so that i can view more than one
thumbnail at a time in gimp-1.3.
also, it seems
i am sorry, i didn't attach your letter like i should have. i hope that
TheGIMP continues to support methods that are accessible to everyone.
There has been a thorough discussion of how to publish with linux and
cmyk issues. My friend took the right path to printing and still got
bitched at by t
Wilber is the name of the computer housed at berkeley.
Looks like we will be planning what will become of Wilber tomorrow.
I apologize as this is short notice for something that is long overdue,
but there you go.
Sorry about the weekend notice also, probably i followed the WrongMethod
like the
there is a wiki. please, don't let me make it alone again.
the first thing that i am going to do is put up a FAQ, or a spot for it.
it is moinmoin wiki, and i opted for moin moin because it wasn't as
developed and ready to go as many of them. it seems to me that perl
works better when it is rew
On 2003-06-15 at 2031.16 -0700, Jeff Trefftzs typed this:
>
> Debugging: you might try firing up the script-fu console in the GIMP
> and testing code snippets there. I've found this to work fairly well.
> My main problem is getting my head back into lisp space ...
>
Eeek!
Jeff, just say no!
we are moving things around on wilber. if you have a directory there,
perhaps you should back things up.
if you have any ideas, perhaps you should pipe up with them.
carol
--
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
___
Gimp-d
Hi Rapha\353l,
On 2003-06-16 at 0907.46 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 14:33:21 -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wilber is the name of the computer housed at berkeley.
> >
> > Looks like we will be planning what wil
nk i can actually
handle this with python, eventually and with a lot of help; but. i don't
think i will ever be able to sort through it with perl. and i am truly
humbled by those who can.
good heavens, please don't stop writing perl!
carol
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:04:52A
On 2003-06-16 at 2157.48 +0200, Marc A. Lehmann typed this:
> > > > http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/fmg-members/geoff/digicam/redeye
>
> Woaw, a PDL plug-in not written by me! Oh my god, I can't believe it
> happened ;)
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:54:42AM -0400
On 2003-06-17 at 1008.32 +0200, Marc A. Lehmann typed this:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:20:03PM -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > anyone who can talk about their GIMP contribution in terms of months
> > should only recieve my gratitude and awe. seriousl
On 2003-06-17 at 1448.17 +0200, Rapha?l Quinet typed this:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:40:10 -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > one thing that i didn't mean was to ruffle any feathers. sorry. i am
> > going to go crazy if the newish site d
i use debian. debian seems to use what ever freaking version number
they would like to. lets talk about that instead.
maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be
involved again :)
carol
--
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
__
python has a template system that might answer all of these issues.
cvs already does whatever cvs wants with the version numbers. but the
person building their gimp could fill in the version number of their
choice, in my gimpenv script or something similar.
i don't know how to build an autoconf
On 2003-06-17 at 2249.44 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson typed this:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
> > I hope that the number of Netscape 4 users has decreased since then, but
> > it is likely that there are still more than a couple of them visiting
> > www.gimp.org.
On 2003-06-18 at 1218.44 +0200, Tino Schwarze typed this:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > > Well, all the agruments I see in favour of 2.0 are always of the form
> > > "well, evereybody else has 2.0". Well, gtk+2 is at 2.2, msoffice is at
> > > 2003 etc..
> >
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/
feel free to edit that
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Bowie, welcome.
I am sure that any idea you have for a filter will be more than welcome
here. :)
carol
On 2003-06-19 at 0205.25 -0700, Bowie J. Poag typed this:
> Is this the right forum to discuss new filter ideas? If so, I have one
> i'd like to share.
>
> Cheers,
> Bowie
>
> _
On 2003-06-19 at 1504.01 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen typed this:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:14, David Neary wrote:
> > Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here.
> > > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release...
> >
> > I say it's time for
there are no clear instructions on the information page about this list
to unsubscribe. can someone unsubscribe me. i have wasted too much
time on this project as it is.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkele
while i was waiting to receive my password from mailman so i can leave
this ship of fools, i cvs checkedout gimp-gap from gnomecvs.
apparently, wofgang uses 1.4 and that is good enough for me.
can someone email me with how to tell my autoconf.sh where GIMP-1.4 is?
i will not have time to check th
When everyone decides how the website and the rest of the gimp documents
will
work together, please email your decision to me the Web Maintainer. Thanks
for your time.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 14.09 schrieb Branko Collin:
Isn't Rebecca Walter part of the team anymore?
Her new job took over all her spare time so she couldn't actively
participate. She promised to chime in when there's some content
to proof it but since there's not much to
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Sam, 2003-07-19 um 19.10 schrieb Carol Spears:
It is difficult to share a "freshman" attempt with developers.
If anyone is interested in seeing what I am doing, helping,
commenting or running it through validation devices, feel free
to suggest the best wa
Christopher W. Curtis wrote:
On 07/19/03 13:10, Carol Spears wrote:
I also will not write any English documentation until I can afford to
buy that book that explains the English rules about
hyphens.
Also, I'm not heard of this, but it sounds like it may pertain more to
British En
Michael Schumacher wrote:
On 19 Jul 2003 at 22:13, David Neary wrote:
[...]
Those are the problems at the philosophical level. At the
practical level, the problems are:
1) Not enough users use bugzilla to report bugs
Bugzilla is powerful, but its power comes at the price of complexity...
i would like to thank all of the developers for their help with
mmaybe.gimp.org.
from the one who made me wait for Tommer to come back and get
involved and the two who effectively fired him without letting
me know. also Raphael for sitting on it until Sven could find
a web site that cuts it down.
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Mon, 2003-07-21 um 17.23 schrieb Sven Neumann:
You want us to include an XML renderer in the help-browser? That
doesn't sound like a simple solution.
Why not? Why should DocBook be more difficult to render than HTML? It
doesn't necessarily have to be a DocBook rende
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Mon, 2003-07-21 um 23.17 schrieb Carol Spears:
i spent some quality time with docbook; olink, ulink and kin.
docbook was not written for gimp. Not the gimp as i understand
it at least.
> DocBook was written exactly for the purpose we need.
I tried to work w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is so insisting is that you are not telling the truth, and I
wonder why you resort to that.
I am not going to let you claim in public that I was lying t
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
can we please try to avoid a flamewar about DocBook here. All our help
is in DocBook, it is a well established format for this purpose. I
admit that it can be quite complex but it is well documented and you
usually need a small subset only. I am sure that people who want t
David Neary wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
Daniel Egger wrote:
DocBook was written exactly for the purpose we need.
as much as i love gimp, i wonder if someone got their rent paid
from netscape.com for making that my choice regardless. With
everything else being so sensible in gimp
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Die, 2003-07-22 um 20.47 schrieb Carol Spears:
I tried to work with simple docbook, docbook, website docbook.
I don't know how recent your gimp download is but this format
is nothing like gimp since gimp-1.0.2. I have to stretch my
imagination so much to mak
Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 1:49 am, Seth Burgess wrote:
Its still pretty bleeding edge. You'll need to get bleeding edge
perl modules (which ones are documented in the gimp-perl cvs) Some
stuff works, some doesn't. Its not looking likely I'll get a
chance to do bring ev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:51:16PM -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is it worth building the gimp-perl module from cvs yet?
Depends on what you are needing it for.
The evrsion in CVS seems to be fully working, excep
Kelly Martin wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
The ball is rolling now and any further discussion about it is only
hurting GIMP's reputation.
You're going to do what you're going to do. I'm just offering my
counsel. Claiming that offering my counsel is "hurting GIMP's
reputation" is a hamfisted wa
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
you and I are scheduled to discuss this after camp. if you continue
to insist to reply to my mail, i will continue to insist that you
stick to *your* scheduled time for this discussion.
I said that I want to wai
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Die, 2003-07-22 um 18.34 schrieb David Neary:
Where is the index? And when you say "outline" do you mean "root
document with lots of dead links"?
Nope, I mean like a rough idea of the table of contents:
1. Introduction
1. Welcome to The G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:51:16PM -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is it worth building the gimp-perl module from cvs yet?
Depends on what you are needing it for.
The evrsion in CVS seems to be fully working, excep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:47:37AM -0400, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
get this message from gimp that if i am elite enough to use
threading, then i am elite enough to fix it.
;)
i think if i pin perl from woody, i am
Miguel Ibarra wrote:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
I hope the maintainers find this worthy of being included in t
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Miguel Ibarra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here's a patch to add optional libstartup-notification support to The
Gimp. This will allow desktop managers as Gnome's to entertain users
with a *so* funny clock cursor, while Gimp launches and initializes
itself.
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Adam D. Moss wrote:
I agree that it would be wise to point out this explicit exemption
for pdb calls into the GIMP LICENSE file. I'll do this soon if I
don't get beaten to it.
Done, for 1.2 and 1.3. (If anyone disagrees with the specifics,
pull it...)
--Adam
can someone ex
i am sitting here, mostly picking my nose, waiting for my ex
room mate to get his shit out of my already crappy enough
apartment without the ferret shit, waiting for email from this
list to distract me with.
this room mate was very rude. he chased my friends away and
drank coffee i made for years
Alan Horkan wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003, Daniel Egger wrote:
Date: 26 Jul 2003 17:03:09 +0200
From: Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Gimp Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] writing german online help
Am Sam, 2003-07-26 um 13.07 schrieb
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Carol Spears wrote:
can someone explain these license problems in perfectly good
fuzzy american words, complete with adjectives and interjections;
perhaps limited to only 3 conjunctions for me?
1) The GPL doesn't allow a GPL and a not-GPL-compatible code unit
401 - 500 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
