of digging.
regards. GG.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
straightforward bit it seems a different
set of choices are needed for reduction.
best regards, GG
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several
interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably missing
the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically to overcome
a problem that has not been identified and may well be the root
I am trying to add some features as a plug-in. As a starting point I
simply cloned deinterlace.c renamed everything containing deinterlace.
So I have a compilable unit with MAIN() query et al.
I reran autgen.sh on gimp then make make install
No errors , no plug-in. Neither on the
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:37:02 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point here is that Carol is continuously abusing her email address.
I have asked her several times not to use it any longer but she ignored
this request and continues to send mails as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm amazed
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:10:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several
interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably
missing the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically
to overcome a
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:19 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can foresee the next situation with the Gimp 2.4 appearing: a good
deal of people asking, why all their scripts do not work anymore. And
most of that poor users took these scripts from the official
Huh? Why don't you use gimptool to build and install the plug-in?
Sven
1/ because Dave's article pointed me to gimptool (as you do) when I tried
to run it , it does not exist:
bash-3.1#gimptool --help
bash: gimptool: command not found
bash-3.1#man gimptool
No manual entry for gimptool
I'll let the native English speakers decide if does not operate on
is better than cannot manipulate, but otherwise I'm ready to add the
tests for the layer masks or channels.
does not operate on seems like a developer's or mathematician's comment,
not language for the end-user who thinks
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:39:40 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
it would be nice if the rectangle and ellipse
selection tools (not the base rectangle tool) would take Alt into
account before the selection is confirmed and behave as if the
selection had been confirmed: Alt = move
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:14:38 +0200, William Skaggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that for consistency the Move tool should act like a
transform tool --- because after all, it *is* a transform tool.
That is, if there is a selection, it should move the contents
of the selection, otherwise
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:34:13 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you are using a development version, it is likely that your toolrc
has not been updated since a while. I recommend that you just delete
it and restart GIMP. Just rm ~/.gimp-2.3/toolrc.
-Raphaël
thanks , that
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:16 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 00:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I was led to thinking it was by Bills comment and did not bother
checking the source.
My point is, moving a selection is probably not
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:52:56 +0200, William Skaggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The user makes a selection then picks the move tool to move it. The
fool! you cry.
Well what do you expect him to do? That seems like a perfectly logical
way
to do it and I would bet you 9/10 new users will do
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I don't
think that
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
1/ In general I find it needs too many mouse/keyboard actions to
achieve a
simple operation.
1a/ specific: undo : edit | undo . This must be one of
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:12:57 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I
pull
up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling.
Now I
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:21:15 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave
differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every
time
you use
could be looked at, I can free-rotate a layer but not an
image.
Colors | Retinex ?? What's that supposed to tell the user? It seems to be
an enhancment filter to me.
Making the menus a bit more usable may reduce the calls for a replacement.
my-2c
/gg
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:36:53 +0200, Saul Goode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gg wrote:
I also find as a user that menus often go too deep.
One sub-menu is acceptable , two starts to get unwieldy. Eg. I ofter
copy
a selection and Paste As New , this is three levels deep. I'd like to
see
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:12:39 +0200, Leon Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saul Goode a écrit :
The menus that you obtain with a right-click have a dotted line
across the top. If you click on that dotted line, a menu window
is created with just that sub-menu. By
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all other toolkits that have tear-off menus
'still interested to know what all the other toolkits are.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:36:29 +0200, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:24:48AM +0200, Omar wrote:
Omar a ?crit :
Alexandre Prokoudine a ?crit :
On 10/20/06, gg wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
all other toolkits that have tear-off
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:19:43 +0200, Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the manual would be helpful for the noob, too!
Which manual ? Gimp? This is not gimp. GTK, Gnome , the Linux manual?
This type of comment is either just trying to be smart or a cop-out.
Users, noob or otherwise,
--- Forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More interface rantings
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:23:37 +0200
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:29:31 +0200, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone point me to a hint on how to
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:18:58 +0200, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I define an alias to make life easier:
alias gncvs='cd /svn cvs -z3 -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome '
You do know that you have to do this step only once, don't you?
is made. The pictures in my web
pages were generated using this method.)
Does the plugin now produce the results on the Ace home page , if not what
does it do?
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https
an image.
There is a whole fleet of this sort of thing right across gimp, many of
which I have already posted about.
I sometimes get the feeling it's always the first time with gimp.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:48:47 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott
You can use bookmarks in the Open Image dialog to quickly flip to
directories. Not that this is exactly what you want, but it's more
convenient than having to browse to a particular directory from scratch.
Kind
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:48:44 +0100, Kasper Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here is what I would like to see in Gimp. I hope that some of it can be
of use.
- Kasper
1) The ability to rotate the canvas freely is very important to
graphic artists. I don't know how cucumbersome/impossible it
--- Forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Re:[Gimp-developer] My wishlist
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:06:08 +0100
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:59:22 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I said Ctrl-Wheel, didn't I?
You did.
Hi,
I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print
some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install
on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors.
$ gimp
GIMP: Error while parsing '/home/prof/.gimp-2.3/gimprc' in
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:36:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to
print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make
install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen
errors.
$
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:51:10 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is still drift on rotation tool using interpolation=NONE
How pointless to tell me. Please make sure that there's a bug report
about it and that it
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:47:54 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the version number is in the library. You also would want your
plug-ins to use ~/.gimp-2.3 when you are running gimp-2.3. Even plug-ins
that were compiled against an older version of the gimp libraries.
Still
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plus I have to remember the reply policy is opposite to other MLs I use.
I get it right most of the time. Appologies for the occasional lapse of
concentration.
regards, gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:35:29 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the library refered to above? Can someone suggest something I
can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this
system?
appologies for the confusion and explaining why.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
for a flash?
Nice clear demo of how to use this powerful tool. Nice work.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
reception I will submit a short text for
inclusion in Hackordnung advising on readability and variable naming.
Current guidelines seem mainly restricted to defining format.
regards, gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
subscription. I assume the charge for one or
two articles would be fairly nominal. Would this be a good use of some of
the gimp projects donations fund?
If the idea is acceptable I'll look into the details.
/gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
for coming up with the goods.
Now to see what effect it will have in practice.
regards, gg.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:13:57 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sven and gg,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All references to Keys' work
back on when needed.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:22:11 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any particular reason why you didn't use the screenshot feature of your
desktop for this? Just asking. Please don't get upset again. I am only
trying to get an idea on why you prefer to use the screenshot plug-in
for
preview? A JPEG internal thumbnail? A Windows Explorer
thumbnail?
also noticed this on linux. Saving a new image next time I go to open
recent I get the generic gimp image not a thumbnail.
I caught my eye , so I guess it's new.
gg.
___
Gimp
day to all.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
playing catch-up.
That's what I'd like to see.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface
with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:26:30 +0100, Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 03:32, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Well, the actual story is that Gutenprint 5.0 includes its own Print
plugin for
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs/gnome
CVS password:
Unknown host anoncvs.gnome.org.
Have I missed a big change or is this a misleading error?
If it means cvs interface has been pulled , where are the instruction to
set up svn?
Thx.
other
selection means.
Currently I dont see a way to select a rectangle larger than the visible
area without compromising precision.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman
it is all installed.
I'd prefer to do this cleanly rather than having to resort to shotgun
deletions.
Thanks again.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
to be quite standard nowadays, and a couple high profile free
software packages are uisng it.
I think that could be a nice surprise for win users.
regards,
js
what would be the advantages?
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
at lanczos.
Thanks to Luis for taking the time to notify the apparent error.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
to code to attempt to explain what was happening but it was
a bit hand wavy. My belief is that I am applying a correction to an offset
coming from outside the scaling code.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
.
However I was seeing a more significant offset on NONE that I detailed
when I split the lancos offset bug (principally for this reason).
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman
pixel in X and/or Y axis; It is also
missing
one line of pixels (which line is omitted varies.)
I think you can achieve the same results without floating. Just try a
rotate.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
be an approach worth investigating throughout gimp since
current methods seem to be somewhat rudementary.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
was to write a new plugin but I gave up since the
documentation was totally inadequate, out of date and sometimes
inaccurate. I decided it would take more time than I had available.
I hope you have more luck.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp
and cleanup that I did got committed, it is now more
readable and maintainable. I did not attempt to fix a couple of oddities
that I noticed (and that Bill initially thought I had introduced).
GG, can you perhaps consider to take your bashing off-list? We all know
very well that the GIMP code
will either fix it over the next days or revert some
optimizations. So please don't wonder about artefacts at the bottom of
the source area, these are due to this bug.
Just FYI: That problem should be fixed now.
Sven
thx for the update.
gg
___
Gimp
in in case it relates the this script issue posted.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:
plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe
This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked
toilet !! I should call out a plumber , this
more enjoyment from the software. I'm more inclined to recommend it to
others.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
.
Like any image processing it's a case of horses for courses and what
defects in the result are acceptable in a specific application with a
specific image.
Thanks for bringing this up. A useful filter to have.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:20:52 +0200, Guillermo Espertino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I made the first suggestion of the direct download link in the
home page alla Mozilla, I can see why it would be problematic.
Maybe it would be better if the link with OS detection redirects to a
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:34:24 +0200, coolhand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
gtk_widget_hide() doesn't do the trick?
Oh! i didn't think on it...
Anyway, it's not considered good style to hide and show widgets. Perhaps
you could explain us what exactly you want to achieve?
Sven
Yes; sorry
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:22 +0200, coolhand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
gimp_progress_bar_init
you should find something useful in this lot:
grep -R gimp_progress_bar libg*
libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_get_type
libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_new
. It may
simply be that you have not discovered how to do the task or it may add
impetus to finish a feature in development.
HTH.
gg
Chris,
There is not nearly enough information in your post to answer that
question.
It depends entirely on the requirements of your graphics team
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:30:13 +0200, SorinN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why we need a Gimp PRO, Inkscape PRO, Scribus PRO - someone, a
Firm / Govern / Foundation / Linux Distro / Billionaire ...or a
mixture of them must hire core developers of all 3 projects - put them
into a big WEB /
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:57:43 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 02:41 +1000, Jasper Schalken wrote:
This is what I thought was a bug (I posted
herehttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432978) but Sven Neumann
says I should discuss it on here first.
lighter than 128 , this does seem to be consistant
with a rounding error.
gg.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:08:21 +0200, Campbell Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
just did a simple test
* 16x16 rgb image
* select half (vertically in my case) and fill in
* run the Gaussian blur, 1 blur pixel
* Hold
- Happens for RLE and IIR
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png
400 x 200 rect , half black / white.
todays cvs build 2.3.17
repeated gaussian blur filter RLE
as reported earlier, after scores of repeated blur grey value at 112 not
128.
gg
from your test case it's surprising that the results are so different.
Maybe you could post your test image somewhere so that we can compare the
results and see why there is a clear difference.
/gg
But of course we will
appreciate any patches that improve the result without hurting
. Std deviation now 35 against 6.0 before.
Maybe it is in fact an artifact of the changes in the code. Now whether
that is a bug or an improvement in the code I am not sure.
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo-fix.png
gg
. There is no most people want to do ... solution here.
Your case would represent a block graphic image type and the result is
clearly unacceptable for the Gimp's top end application aspirations.
Thanks for the detail.
gg
It is likely to be linked with the way the blur code handles pixels
convolution of which blur is an example, can
require data outside the image to function upto the edge.
This has quite simply to be made up by one means or another. There are
several strategies whose suitabilities generally depend on the image
content.
So in short , no, they cant just be ignored.
gg
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:30:42 +0200, Jasper Schalken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434279
On 29/04/07, Jasper Schalken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could have a look at the matrix convolution filter code. (Be
warned
there are some
pixel offset errors are pretty much to
be expected. I dont recall you mentioning the distortion last time.
could you provide more instructions to reproduce the error , I just made a
cross ran despeckle and see not difference at all.
gg
___
Gimp
. Please don't judge GIMP's bug handling
by Fedora.
For gg:
I suspect it got ignored since one pixel offset errors are pretty
much to be expected.
???!!!
Well, now this answer was indeed unexpected!
For me this kind of bugs is enough reason to never use a program!!!
You cannot apply a filter
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:13:03 +0200, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
modifying that code base to deal with this properly will most probably
been seen as more lasting contributions than changing code that
eventually only will live on machines running legacy 2.4 series GIMP
due either to
pls ignore.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient
debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that
/opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced.
In fact I noticed it was a couple of days old but the rest of /opt/gimp
was updating to I did rm -rf
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:40:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient
debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that
/opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced.
In fact I noticed it was a couple of days
of it all seems to be there and installed as expect. All but
the program file.
Odd.
Thanks for you help.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
like a good time to bring these points up.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
cant get to the
bottom of exactly what is happening, I want to get back to fixing lanczos
decimation.
The main point is I have a working Gimp and full debugging and variable
eval in kdevelop which is great.
Thanks for your comments.
/gg
___
Gimp
.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
these icons are just different scale
renditions saved as different files?
thx
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
meaning in the
interface that's fine.
layer masks would be clearer, if you think channel is unambiguous no
need to change that term.
corrected suggestion:
c/affect channels and masks only/only affects channels and layer masks/
dont display on non indexed images.
/gg
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:13:42 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to
cover the case where an indexed layer was added. The basic point is that
this
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:30:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:13:42 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying
to
cover the case
detailed discussion should probably wait
until the whole issue is reviewed after 2.4 release.
Thanks for you comments.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
more humble. We all know
emails and posts are a clumbsy for of communication, so let's all try to
take things with a pinch of salt and concentrate on improving Gimp.
Now I have a lanczos filter to debug, so good day to all. En avant!
/gg
___
Gimp
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:57:23 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the conditional should and the uncertainty probably. I'm not
being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
proposing a
in and cast his expert eye on whether this could better
be presented in different way in the UI.
But as this will not be a trivial discussion the descission was to put all
this off 'till later and probably tackle it as part of GEGL integration.
Thanks for your thoughts.
/gg
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:52:53 +0200, David Marrs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With a save *selection* for web feature, steps 3) and 4) could
probably be
omitted altogether for most of the time.
well save for web is a plugin but it probably could be extended to save a
selection. Sounds like a
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:50:44 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 11:58 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
filepath.diff adds a 'file path' field to the 'Image Properties'
dialog; I did this after some discussion between gg and myself on the
importance of being
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:33:28 +0200, guepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also noticed a crash happening when checking the use restart markers
and then enabling the preview toggle. I found the bug, it is now fully
working. Maybe this issue has been corrected in dev version, but I
downloaded the
On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:19:57 +0200, Guillermo Espertino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Se only opened the image from the camera, adjusted the curves, and
scaled it down (BTW, the downscale code should do oversamplig by
default. It always breaks a little the edges). Until she saved, the
image
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo