[Gimp-developer] Lanczos algorithm matrix

2006-09-17 Thread gg
of digging. regards. GG. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] Re: Lanczos algorithm funnyness?

2006-09-17 Thread gg
straightforward bit it seems a different set of choices are needed for reduction. best regards, GG ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] Re: Lanczos filter

2006-09-24 Thread gg
Hi, I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably missing the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically to overcome a problem that has not been identified and may well be the root

[Gimp-developer] plugin not installing

2006-09-25 Thread gg
I am trying to add some features as a plug-in. As a starting point I simply cloned deinterlace.c renamed everything containing deinterlace. So I have a compilable unit with MAIN() query et al. I reran autgen.sh on gimp then make make install No errors , no plug-in. Neither on the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Are @gimp.org aliases needed at all?

2006-09-26 Thread gg
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:37:02 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point here is that Carol is continuously abusing her email address. I have asked her several times not to use it any longer but she ignored this request and continues to send mails as [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm amazed

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Lanczos filter

2006-09-26 Thread gg
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:10:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably missing the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically to overcome a

Re: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: [Gimp-developer] devel docs

2006-09-26 Thread gg
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:19 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can foresee the next situation with the Gimp 2.4 appearing: a good deal of people asking, why all their scripts do not work anymore. And most of that poor users took these scripts from the official

Re: Re: [Gimp-developer] plugin not installing

2006-09-26 Thread gg
Huh? Why don't you use gimptool to build and install the plug-in? Sven 1/ because Dave's article pointed me to gimptool (as you do) when I tried to run it , it does not exist: bash-3.1#gimptool --help bash: gimptool: command not found bash-3.1#man gimptool No manual entry for gimptool

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tool statusbar error messages

2006-09-27 Thread gg
I'll let the native English speakers decide if does not operate on is better than cannot manipulate, but otherwise I'm ready to add the tests for the layer masks or channels. does not operate on seems like a developer's or mathematician's comment, not language for the end-user who thinks

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-27 Thread gg
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:39:40 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it would be nice if the rectangle and ellipse selection tools (not the base rectangle tool) would take Alt into account before the selection is confirmed and behave as if the selection had been confirmed: Alt = move

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-27 Thread gg
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:14:38 +0200, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems that for consistency the Move tool should act like a transform tool --- because after all, it *is* a transform tool. That is, if there is a selection, it should move the contents of the selection, otherwise

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-27 Thread gg
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:34:13 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you are using a development version, it is likely that your toolrc has not been updated since a while. I recommend that you just delete it and restart GIMP. Just rm ~/.gimp-2.3/toolrc. -Raphaël thanks , that

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-27 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:16 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 00:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, I was led to thinking it was by Bills comment and did not bother checking the source. My point is, moving a selection is probably not

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-27 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:52:56 +0200, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The user makes a selection then picks the move tool to move it. The fool! you cry. Well what do you expect him to do? That seems like a perfectly logical way to do it and I would bet you 9/10 new users will do

Re: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I don't think that

Re: [Gimp-developer] UI improvements (was: Moving selection contents with the move tool?)

2006-09-28 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] 1/ In general I find it needs too many mouse/keyboard actions to achieve a simple operation. 1a/ specific: undo : edit | undo . This must be one of

Re: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: [Gimp-developer] UI improvements (was: Moving selection contents with the move tool?)

2006-09-28 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:12:57 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote: 2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I pull up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling. Now I

Re: [Gimp-developer] UI improvements (was: Moving selection contents with the move tool?)

2006-09-28 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:21:15 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every time you use

Re: [Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread gg
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:32:33 +0200, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A google of CAD translations and transformations will readily display how the two operations are commonly paired. Perhaps a better question to ask would be what graphics programs *don't* associate these operations? Be

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-14 Thread gg
could be looked at, I can free-rotate a layer but not an image. Colors | Retinex ?? What's that supposed to tell the user? It seems to be an enhancment filter to me. Making the menus a bit more usable may reduce the calls for a replacement. my-2c /gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-15 Thread gg
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:36:53 +0200, Saul Goode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gg wrote: I also find as a user that menus often go too deep. One sub-menu is acceptable , two starts to get unwieldy. Eg. I ofter copy a selection and Paste As New , this is three levels deep. I'd like to see

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread gg
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:12:39 +0200, Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Saul Goode a écrit : The menus that you obtain with a right-click have a dotted line across the top. If you click on that dotted line, a menu window is created with just that sub-menu. By

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread gg
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: all other toolkits that have tear-off menus 'still interested to know what all the other toolkits are. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread gg
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:36:29 +0200, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:24:48AM +0200, Omar wrote: Omar a ?crit : Alexandre Prokoudine a ?crit : On 10/20/06, gg wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote: all other toolkits that have tear-off

Re: [Gimp-developer] Specifically simplifying user interaction

2006-10-19 Thread gg
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:19:43 +0200, Omar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Reading the manual would be helpful for the noob, too! Which manual ? Gimp? This is not gimp. GTK, Gnome , the Linux manual? This type of comment is either just trying to be smart or a cop-out. Users, noob or otherwise,

Fwd: Re: [Gimp-developer] More interface rantings

2006-10-20 Thread gg
--- Forwarded message --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More interface rantings Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:23:37 +0200 On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:29:31 +0200, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can someone point me to a hint on how to

Re: Fwd: Re: [Gimp-developer] More interface rantings

2006-10-22 Thread gg
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:18:58 +0200, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I define an alias to make life easier: alias gncvs='cd /svn cvs -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome ' You do know that you have to do this step only once, don't you?

Re: Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-ace2 plugin

2006-10-23 Thread gg
is made. The pictures in my web pages were generated using this method.) Does the plugin now produce the results on the Ace home page , if not what does it do? gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: More interface rantings

2006-10-30 Thread gg
an image. There is a whole fleet of this sort of thing right across gimp, many of which I have already posted about. I sometimes get the feeling it's always the first time with gimp. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: More interface rantings

2006-10-31 Thread gg
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:48:47 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Scott You can use bookmarks in the Open Image dialog to quickly flip to directories. Not that this is exactly what you want, but it's more convenient than having to browse to a particular directory from scratch. Kind

Re: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** [Gimp-developer] My wishlist

2006-10-31 Thread gg
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:48:44 +0100, Kasper Hviid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is what I would like to see in Gimp. I hope that some of it can be of use. - Kasper 1) The ability to rotate the canvas freely is very important to graphic artists. I don't know how cucumbersome/impossible it

Fwd: Re: Re:[Gimp-developer] My wishlist

2006-11-04 Thread gg
--- Forwarded message --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: Re:[Gimp-developer] My wishlist Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:06:08 +0100 On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:59:22 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I said Ctrl-Wheel, didn't I? You did.

[Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-15 Thread gg
Hi, I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors. $ gimp GIMP: Error while parsing '/home/prof/.gimp-2.3/gimprc' in

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-15 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:36:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors. $

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-16 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:51:10 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is still drift on rotation tool using interpolation=NONE How pointless to tell me. Please make sure that there's a bug report about it and that it

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-16 Thread gg
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:47:54 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because the version number is in the library. You also would want your plug-ins to use ~/.gimp-2.3 when you are running gimp-2.3. Even plug-ins that were compiled against an older version of the gimp libraries. Still

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-17 Thread gg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Plus I have to remember the reply policy is opposite to other MLs I use. I get it right most of the time. Appologies for the occasional lapse of concentration. regards, gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimprc confusion

2006-11-17 Thread gg
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:35:29 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the library refered to above? Can someone suggest something I can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this system?

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 showstoppers

2006-11-19 Thread gg
appologies for the confusion and explaining why. gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] video tutorial about perspective clone tool

2006-11-23 Thread gg
for a flash? Nice clear demo of how to use this powerful tool. Nice work. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] neue Hackordnung

2006-11-26 Thread gg
reception I will submit a short text for inclusion in Hackordnung advising on readability and variable naming. Current guidelines seem mainly restricted to defining format. regards, gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] improving bicubic interpolation

2007-01-24 Thread gg
subscription. I assume the charge for one or two articles would be fairly nominal. Would this be a good use of some of the gimp projects donations fund? If the idea is acceptable I'll look into the details. /gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] improving bicubic interpolation

2007-01-25 Thread gg
for coming up with the goods. Now to see what effect it will have in practice. regards, gg. On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:13:57 +0100, Mukund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sven and gg, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All references to Keys' work

Re: [Gimp-developer] Meaning of delay in screenshot plugin

2007-01-30 Thread gg
back on when needed. gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Meaning of delay in screenshot plugin

2007-01-30 Thread gg
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:22:11 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any particular reason why you didn't use the screenshot feature of your desktop for this? Just asking. Please don't get upset again. I am only trying to get an idea on why you prefer to use the screenshot plug-in for

Re: [Gimp-developer] saving image doesn't create thumbnail in 2.3.14 for Windows

2007-01-31 Thread gg
preview? A JPEG internal thumbnail? A Windows Explorer thumbnail? also noticed this on linux. Saving a new image next time I go to open recent I get the generic gimp image not a thumbnail. I caught my eye , so I guess it's new. gg. ___ Gimp

[Gimp-developer] Fwd: Re: Meaning of delay in screenshot plugin

2007-02-01 Thread gg
day to all. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Save As JPG Integrated

2007-02-07 Thread gg
playing catch-up. That's what I'd like to see. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-02-16 Thread gg
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously

Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-02-20 Thread gg
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously

Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-02-20 Thread gg
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:26:30 +0100, Hal V. Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 20 February 2007 03:32, Robert L Krawitz wrote: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip Well, the actual story is that Gutenprint 5.0 includes its own Print plugin for

[Gimp-developer] Unknown host anoncvs.gnome.org

2007-02-24 Thread gg
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs/gnome CVS password: Unknown host anoncvs.gnome.org. Have I missed a big change or is this a misleading error? If it means cvs interface has been pulled , where are the instruction to set up svn? Thx.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Enhancement Proposal: Add a temporary magnifier

2007-02-24 Thread gg
other selection means. Currently I dont see a way to select a rectangle larger than the visible area without compromising precision. gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman

Re: [Gimp-developer] prefix issues

2007-02-27 Thread gg
it is all installed. I'd prefer to do this cleanly rather than having to resort to shotgun deletions. Thanks again. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] gimpwin install

2007-02-28 Thread gg
to be quite standard nowadays, and a couple high profile free software packages are uisng it. I think that could be a nice surprise for win users. regards, js what would be the advantages? gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-07 Thread gg
at lanczos. Thanks to Luis for taking the time to notify the apparent error. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-07 Thread gg
to code to attempt to explain what was happening but it was a bit hand wavy. My belief is that I am applying a correction to an offset coming from outside the scaling code. gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-07 Thread gg
. However I was seeing a more significant offset on NONE that I detailed when I split the lancos offset bug (principally for this reason). gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman

Re: [Gimp-developer] transformation drift [was: preview window does not work]

2007-03-08 Thread gg
pixel in X and/or Y axis; It is also missing one line of pixels (which line is omitted varies.) I think you can achieve the same results without floating. Just try a rotate. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-08 Thread gg
be an approach worth investigating throughout gimp since current methods seem to be somewhat rudementary. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-08 Thread gg
was to write a new plugin but I gave up since the documentation was totally inadequate, out of date and sometimes inaccurate. I decided it would take more time than I had available. I hope you have more luck. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] preview window does not work

2007-03-09 Thread gg
and cleanup that I did got committed, it is now more readable and maintainable. I did not attempt to fix a couple of oddities that I noticed (and that Bill initially thought I had introduced). GG, can you perhaps consider to take your bashing off-list? We all know very well that the GIMP code

Re: [Gimp-developer] transformation drift [was: preview window does not work]

2007-03-10 Thread gg
will either fix it over the next days or revert some optimizations. So please don't wonder about artefacts at the bottom of the source area, these are due to this bug. Just FYI: That problem should be fixed now. Sven thx for the update. gg ___ Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread gg
in in case it relates the this script issue posted. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread gg
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3: plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked toilet !! I should call out a plumber , this

Re: [Gimp-developer] Rudeness on gimp devel and bugzilla - was: Re: Tools

2007-03-20 Thread gg
more enjoyment from the software. I'm more inclined to recommend it to others. gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] Denoising Plugin

2007-03-29 Thread gg
. Like any image processing it's a case of horses for courses and what defects in the result are acceptable in a specific application with a specific image. Thanks for bringing this up. A useful filter to have. gg. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] One-click binary downloads via the gimp website

2007-04-10 Thread gg
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:20:52 +0200, Guillermo Espertino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although I made the first suggestion of the direct download link in the home page alla Mozilla, I can see why it would be problematic. Maybe it would be better if the link with OS detection redirects to a

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem with gimp progress bar

2007-04-13 Thread gg
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:34:24 +0200, coolhand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gtk_widget_hide() doesn't do the trick? Oh! i didn't think on it... Anyway, it's not considered good style to hide and show widgets. Perhaps you could explain us what exactly you want to achieve? Sven Yes; sorry

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem with gimp progress bar

2007-04-13 Thread gg
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:22 +0200, coolhand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gimp_progress_bar_init you should find something useful in this lot: grep -R gimp_progress_bar libg* libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_get_type libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_new

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 release date

2007-04-15 Thread gg
. It may simply be that you have not discovered how to do the task or it may add impetus to finish a feature in development. HTH. gg Chris, There is not nearly enough information in your post to answer that question. It depends entirely on the requirements of your graphics team

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.4 release date

2007-04-16 Thread gg
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:30:13 +0200, SorinN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's why we need a Gimp PRO, Inkscape PRO, Scribus PRO - someone, a Firm / Govern / Foundation / Linux Distro / Billionaire ...or a mixture of them must hire core developers of all 3 projects - put them into a big WEB /

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-24 Thread gg
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:57:43 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 02:41 +1000, Jasper Schalken wrote: This is what I thought was a bug (I posted herehttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432978) but Sven Neumann says I should discuss it on here first.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-25 Thread gg
lighter than 128 , this does seem to be consistant with a rounding error. gg. On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:08:21 +0200, Campbell Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just did a simple test * 16x16 rgb image * select half (vertically in my case) and fill in * run the Gaussian blur, 1 blur pixel * Hold

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-25 Thread gg
- Happens for RLE and IIR http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png 400 x 200 rect , half black / white. todays cvs build 2.3.17 repeated gaussian blur filter RLE as reported earlier, after scores of repeated blur grey value at 112 not 128. gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-26 Thread gg
from your test case it's surprising that the results are so different. Maybe you could post your test image somewhere so that we can compare the results and see why there is a clear difference. /gg But of course we will appreciate any patches that improve the result without hurting

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-26 Thread gg
. The gimp now has a much better implementation of the gaussian blur algorithm. Great news. and thanks to Jasper Schalken for bringing up the whole blur darkening issue. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-28 Thread gg
. Std deviation now 35 against 6.0 before. Maybe it is in fact an artifact of the changes in the code. Now whether that is a bug or an improvement in the code I am not sure. http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo-fix.png gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-28 Thread gg
. There is no most people want to do ... solution here. Your case would represent a block graphic image type and the result is clearly unacceptable for the Gimp's top end application aspirations. Thanks for the detail. gg It is likely to be linked with the way the blur code handles pixels

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-28 Thread gg
convolution of which blur is an example, can require data outside the image to function upto the edge. This has quite simply to be made up by one means or another. There are several strategies whose suitabilities generally depend on the image content. So in short , no, they cant just be ignored. gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] Blur tool darkens image?

2007-04-29 Thread gg
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:30:42 +0200, Jasper Schalken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434279 On 29/04/07, Jasper Schalken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could have a look at the matrix convolution filter code. (Be warned there are some

Re: [Gimp-developer] still the same bug

2007-04-30 Thread gg
pixel offset errors are pretty much to be expected. I dont recall you mentioning the distortion last time. could you provide more instructions to reproduce the error , I just made a cross ran despeckle and see not difference at all. gg ___ Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] still the same bug

2007-05-01 Thread gg
. Please don't judge GIMP's bug handling by Fedora. For gg: I suspect it got ignored since one pixel offset errors are pretty much to be expected. ???!!! Well, now this answer was indeed unexpected! For me this kind of bugs is enough reason to never use a program!!! You cannot apply a filter

Re: [Gimp-developer] GEGL is no longer vapor. (was: improving image scale: reduction)

2007-06-15 Thread gg
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:13:03 +0200, Øyvind Kolås [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: modifying that code base to deal with this properly will most probably been seen as more lasting contributions than changing code that eventually only will live on machines running legacy 2.4 series GIMP due either to

[Gimp-developer] list test

2007-06-20 Thread gg
pls ignore. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] what, no prog?

2007-06-20 Thread gg
Hi, after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced. In fact I noticed it was a couple of days old but the rest of /opt/gimp was updating to I did rm -rf

Re: [Gimp-developer] what, no prog?

2007-06-20 Thread gg
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:40:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced. In fact I noticed it was a couple of days

Re: [Gimp-developer] what, no prog?

2007-06-20 Thread gg
of it all seems to be there and installed as expect. All but the program file. Odd. Thanks for you help. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

[Gimp-developer] input configuration

2007-06-21 Thread gg
like a good time to bring these points up. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] what, no prog?

2007-06-21 Thread gg
cant get to the bottom of exactly what is happening, I want to get back to fixing lanczos decimation. The main point is I have a working Gimp and full debugging and variable eval in kdevelop which is great. Thanks for your comments. /gg ___ Gimp

[Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-21 Thread gg
. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] input configuration

2007-06-21 Thread gg
these icons are just different scale renditions saved as different files? thx /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-21 Thread gg
meaning in the interface that's fine. layer masks would be clearer, if you think channel is unambiguous no need to change that term. corrected suggestion: c/affect channels and masks only/only affects channels and layer masks/ dont display on non indexed images. /gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-21 Thread gg
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:13:42 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to cover the case where an indexed layer was added. The basic point is that this

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-22 Thread gg
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:30:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:13:42 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to cover the case

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-23 Thread gg
detailed discussion should probably wait until the whole issue is reviewed after 2.4 release. Thanks for you comments. /gg ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.3.18 deletes exif data from images

2007-06-23 Thread gg
more humble. We all know emails and posts are a clumbsy for of communication, so let's all try to take things with a pinch of salt and concentrate on improving Gimp. Now I have a lanczos filter to debug, so good day to all. En avant! /gg ___ Gimp

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-23 Thread gg
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:57:23 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note the conditional should and the uncertainty probably. I'm not being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest proposing a

Re: [Gimp-developer] index colour images: interp

2007-06-23 Thread gg
in and cast his expert eye on whether this could better be presented in different way in the UI. But as this will not be a trivial discussion the descission was to put all this off 'till later and probably tackle it as part of GEGL integration. Thanks for your thoughts. /gg

Re: [Gimp-developer] Webdesign is wrong

2007-06-25 Thread gg
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:52:53 +0200, David Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With a save *selection* for web feature, steps 3) and 4) could probably be omitted altogether for most of the time. well save for web is a plugin but it probably could be extended to save a selection. Sounds like a

  1   2   3   >