l save a lot of digging.
regards. GG.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
esumably fairly straightforward bit it seems a different
set of choices are needed for reduction.
best regards, GG
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several
interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably missing
the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically to overcome
a problem that has not been identified and may well be the root c
I am trying to add some features as a plug-in. As a starting point I
simply cloned deinterlace.c renamed everything containing "deinterlace".
So I have a compilable unit with MAIN() query et al.
I reran autgen.sh on gimp then make && make install
No errors , no plug-in. Neither on the enh
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:37:02 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point here is that Carol is continuously abusing her email address.
I have asked her several times not to use it any longer but she ignored
this request and continues to send mails as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm amazed
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:10:01 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to iron out some of the anomolies here and there are several
interpolations using a frig factor I dont understand. I'm probably
missing the point but I get the feeling this has been done impirically
to overcome
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:06:19 +0200, Alexander Rabtchevich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can foresee the next situation with the Gimp 2.4 appearing: a good
deal of people asking, why all their scripts do not work anymore. And
most of that poor users took these scripts from the official
reg
Huh? Why don't you use gimptool to build and install the plug-in?
Sven
1/ because Dave's article pointed me to gimptool (as you do) when I tried
to run it , it does not exist:
bash-3.1#gimptool --help
bash: gimptool: command not found
bash-3.1#man gimptool
No manual entry for gimptool
I'll let the native English speakers decide if "does not operate on"
is better than "cannot manipulate", but otherwise I'm ready to add the
tests for the layer masks or channels.
"does not operate on" seems like a developer's or mathematician's comment,
not language for the end-user who thi
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:39:40 +0200, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
it would be nice if the rectangle and ellipse
selection tools (not the base rectangle tool) would take Alt into
account before the selection is confirmed and behave as if the
selection had been confirmed: Alt = move
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:14:38 +0200, William Skaggs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that for consistency the Move tool should act like a
transform tool --- because after all, it *is* a transform tool.
That is, if there is a selection, it should move the contents
of the selection, otherwise
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:34:13 +0200, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
If you are using a development version, it is likely that your toolrc
has not been updated since a while. I recommend that you just delete
it and restart GIMP. Just rm ~/.gimp-2.3/toolrc.
-Raphaël
thanks , that g
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:10:16 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 00:04 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I was led to thinking it was by Bills comment and did not bother
checking the source.
My point is, moving a selection is probably not transformi
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:52:56 +0200, William Skaggs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The user makes a selection then picks the move tool to move it. "The
fool!" you cry.
Well what do you expect him to do? That seems like a perfectly logical
way
to do it and I would bet you 9/10 new users will
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I don't
think that m
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
1/ In general I find it needs too many mouse/keyboard actions to
achieve a
simple operation.
1a/ specific: undo : edit | undo . This must be one of
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:12:57 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> 2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I
pull
> up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling.
Now I
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:21:15 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave
differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every
time
you use
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:32:33 +0200, saulgoode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
A google of
"CAD translations and transformations" will readily display how the two
operations are commonly paired. Perhaps a better question to ask would
be what graphics programs *don't* associate these operations?
Be
uld be on the image menu.
Some anomolies could be looked at, I can free-rotate a layer but not an
image.
Colors | Retinex ?? What's that supposed to tell the user? It seems to be
an enhancment filter to me.
Making the menus a bit more usable may reduce the
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:36:53 +0200, Saul Goode
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gg wrote:
I also find as a user that menus often go too deep.
One sub-menu is acceptable , two starts to get unwieldy. Eg. I ofter
copy
a selection and Paste As New , this is three levels deep. I'd l
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:12:39 +0200, Leon Brooks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Saul Goode a écrit :
The menus that you obtain with a right-click have a dotted line
across the top. If you click on that dotted line, a menu window
is created with just that sub-menu.
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
all other toolkits that have tear-off menus
'still interested to know what "all the other toolkits" are.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:36:29 +0200, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:24:48AM +0200, Omar wrote:
Omar a ?crit :
>Alexandre Prokoudine a ?crit :
>>On 10/20/06, gg wrote:
>>>On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:35:19 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
>>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:19:43 +0200, Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reading the manual would be helpful for the noob, too!
Which manual ? Gimp? This is not gimp. GTK, Gnome , the "Linux" manual?
This type of comment is either just trying to be smart or a cop-out.
Users, noob or otherwise, sh
--- Forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] More interface rantings
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:23:37 +0200
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:29:31 +0200, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone point me to a hint on how to
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:18:58 +0200, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I define an alias to make life easier:
alias gncvs='cd /svn && cvs -z3 -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome '
You do know that you have to do this step only once, don't you?
Afte
nd Tk versions of the software; the GIMP
plug in may be updated once a decision is made. The pictures in my web
pages were generated using this method.)
Does the plugin now produce the results on the Ace home page , if not what
does it do?
gg
___
time I save an image.
There is a whole fleet of this sort of thing right across gimp, many of
which I have already posted about.
I sometimes get the feeling it's always "the first time" with gimp.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer m
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:48:47 +0100, Mukund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Scott
You can use bookmarks in the Open Image dialog to quickly flip to
directories. Not that this is exactly what you want, but it's more
convenient than having to browse to a particular directory from scratch.
Kind
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:48:44 +0100, Kasper Hviid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Here is what I would like to see in Gimp. I hope that some of it can be
of use.
- Kasper
1) The ability to rotate the canvas freely is very important to
graphic artists. I don't know how cucumbersome/impossible it
--- Forwarded message ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Re:[Gimp-developer] My wishlist
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:06:08 +0100
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:59:22 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I said Ctrl-Wheel, didn't I?
You
Hi,
I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to print
some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make install
on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen errors.
$ gimp
GIMP: Error while parsing '/home/prof/.gimp-2.3/gimprc' in li
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:36:53 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I had gimp-cvs installed in /opt/gimp and wanted to use gimp-2.2 to
print some photos. I was getting errors starting gimp-2.2 so I ran make
install on gimp-cvs but 2.2. failed to start thowing up half a dozen
errors.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:51:10 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is still drift on rotation tool using interpolation=NONE
How pointless to tell me. Please make sure that there's a bug report
about it and that i
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:47:54 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the version number is in the library. You also would want your
plug-ins to use ~/.gimp-2.3 when you are running gimp-2.3. Even plug-ins
that were compiled against an older version of the gimp libraries.
Still
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Plus I have to remember the reply policy is opposite to other MLs I use.
I get it right most of the time. Appologies for the occasional lapse of
concentration.
regards, gg.
___
Gimp
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:35:29 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 23:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is "the library" refered to above? Can someone suggest something I
can run through 'find' to locate whatever cruft is lying around on this
system?
ith that.
I was simply offering my appologies for the confusion and explaining why.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
re speaks a thousand words , how many for a flash?
Nice clear demo of how to use this powerful tool. Nice work.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
be largely wasted decrypting the code
before being productive.
If the idea gets a favourable reception I will submit a short text for
inclusion in Hackordnung advising on readability and variable naming.
Current guidelines seem mainly restricted to defining format.
regards, gg
_
and
available on a per article subscription. I assume the charge for one or
two articles would be fairly nominal. Would this be a good use of some of
the gimp projects donations fund?
If the idea is acceptable I'll look into the details.
/gg.
__
n for coming up with the goods.
Now to see what effect it will have in practice.
regards, gg.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:13:57 +0100, Mukund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sven and gg,
>
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 10:13 +0100, [EMAIL P
I got variable debugging.
This was pretty trivial but not obvious at first since gimp uses autotools
in a non-standard way.
If anyone's interested I can post a couple of tips.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.ED
, Mitch? Any chance of that?
>
> Meanwhile: you can still grab a menu by shooting the entire screen
> with a delay, then cropping it afterward ... arduous but better than
> nothing. Or use 2.2. :-)
>
Yes, this sort of feature regression is regrettable. Things sho
r this data would also be more efficient.
3) maybe NONE needs the same mysterious -0.5 as the others until the
reason becomes clear.
I agree the cubic spline vs cubic kernel issue can take second place to
tidying up this lot.
gg
___
Gimp-
iscussion afterwards.
Luckily we still have your lame effort to fall back on when needed.
gg.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:22:11 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any particular reason why you didn't use the screenshot feature of your
> desktop for this? Just asking. Please don't get upset again. I am only
> trying to get an idea on why you prefer to use the screenshot plug-in
> f
thumbnail are you talking about? A GIMP file
> browser preview? A JPEG internal thumbnail? A Windows Explorer
> thumbnail?
also noticed this on linux. Saving a new image next time I go to open
recent I get the generic gimp image not a thumbna
ng distilled into an effective and flexible solution so quickly.
This is OSS working the way it should work.
Good day to all.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
lready in Gimp so why duplicate them? Someone
choosing "save for the web" needs help, let's provide some rather than
maintaining them in thier ignoracen and providing enevitably compromised
solutions.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
sers to get to that stage rather than
providing mediocre results with "optimisations" determined without
established criteria or prior knowlege of the data.
We have the choice to provide a better solution than PS rather than just
playing catch-up.
That's what I'd like to see.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
likely to associate either
of these actions with a save as jpeg operation.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:33:20 +0100, Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Neumann wrote:
>> If I understood Kevin correctly the long-term goal for Tiny-Fu is to
>> start the interpreter on demand for each script that is executed. So at
>> some point scripts will behave more like plug-ins.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface
>with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously
>
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:01:16 +0100, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:33:40 +0100
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> There is also problems with the way changes broke the interface
>with gimp=print, amongst other things. Gimp 2.3 is still seriously
>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:26:30 +0100, Hal V. Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 03:32, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:35:59 +0100
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> snip
>
>> Well, the actual story is that Gutenprint 5.0 includes its own Print
>
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvs/gnome
CVS password:
Unknown host anoncvs.gnome.org.
Have I missed a big change or is this a misleading error?
If it means cvs interface has been pulled , where are the instruction to
set up svn?
Thx.
e, zoom in, click second defining vertex.
Currently the zoom is disabled while the mouse button is down.
I'll let Peter suggest the best way implement this. Whether by allowing
mouse scroll events while left button is depressed , or by some other
selection means.
Currently I dont see a way
quired.
It seems that make uninstall; make clean; is not sufficient to clean up
the installation.
I also went through and manually deleted anything that seemed to relate to
gimp then reran make install.
It seems that the make scripts are incomplet
target `maintainer-clean'. Stop.
I have resolved the immediate problem by deleting everything in sight
including the source and starting over again.
When I can spare the computer next I will try 'make maintainer-clean'
again, now it is all installed.
I'd prefe
ent zip files?
>
> It seems to be quite standard nowadays, and a couple high profile free
> software packages are uisng it.
>
> I think that could be a nice surprise for win users.
>
> regards,
>
> js
what would be the advantages?
gg
__
what I suggested six mounths ago when I first started
looking at lanczos.
Thanks to Luis for taking the time to notify the apparent error.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
dd fiddle factors to achieve this. I added
some comments to code to attempt to explain what was happening but it was
a bit hand wavy. My belief is that I am applying a correction to an offset
coming from outside the scaling code.
gg.
___
ng errors are unavoidable when doing everything in integer
arithmatic although I think quite a bit could be done to reduce the
accumulation of errors.
However I was seeing a more significant offset on NONE that I detailed
when I split the "lancos offset" bug (principally for this r
diting the coordinates in the
> rotation
> dialog to make them exact). Set the angle to 90 degrees and the
> interpolation to NONE. Supersampling option appears to have no effect in
> this case.
> * The result may be offset by 1 pixel in X and/or Y axis; It is also
> missing
rred and then replace this with an extrapolation of the edges
of the reduces area containing correct data. This will provide more
visually acceptable results in your test case although this can never be
mathematically rigourous since you are arbitarily extrapolation outside
known data.
I did not attempt to fix these anomolies.
My initial idea was to write a new plugin but I gave up since the
documentation was totally inadequate, out of date and sometimes
inaccurate. I decided it would take more time than I had available.
I hope you have more luck.
gg
__
Your changes got committed, if I remember correctly.
>
Yes the readability and cleanup that I did got committed, it is now more
readable and maintainable. I did not attempt to fix a couple of oddities
that I noticed (and that Bill initially thought I had introduced).
> GG, can you perha
days ago. I am aware of
>> the bug and I will either fix it over the next days or revert some
>> optimizations. So please don't wonder about artefacts at the bottom of
>> the source area, these are due to this bug.
>
> Just FYI: That p
le geometric shape , rotate L 15, rotate
R 15, the ammount of non-symetric noise is not good.
Thanks for taking the comments on board, I think it's important that the
gimp does not degrade image quality more than is mathematically
unavoidable.
gg.
__
t properly error
trapped.
I just throw this info in in case it relates the this script issue posted.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:
> plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe
This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked
toilet !! I should call out a plumber , t
ilds good will. I come away with a positive impression and I
get more enjoyment from the software. I'm more inclined to recommend it to
others.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
bit hit.
The overall effect is pleasing and probably would be good for a lot of
applications.
Like any image processing it's a case of horses for courses and what
defects in the result are acceptable in a specific application with a
specific image.
Thanks for bringing this up.
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:20:52 +0200, Guillermo Espertino
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although I made the first suggestion of the direct download link in the
> home page alla Mozilla, I can see why it would be problematic.
> Maybe it would be better if the link with OS detection redirects to a
>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:34:24 +0200, coolhand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>> gtk_widget_hide() doesn't do the trick?
>
> Oh! i didn't think on it...
>
>> Anyway, it's not considered good style to hide and show widgets. Perhaps
>> you could explain us what exactly you want to achieve?
>>
>>
>> Sv
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:05:22 +0200, coolhand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> gimp_progress_bar_init
you should find something useful in this lot:
grep -R gimp_progress_bar libg*
libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_get_type
libgimp/gimpui.def: gimp_progress_bar_new
libgimp/gimpprogressb
ith Gimp and vice versa.
As he said you really need one of your graphics team to determine any
important tasks that you cant manage to do with gimp and ask. It may
simply be that you have not discovered how to do the task or it may add
impetus to finish a feature in development.
HTH.
gg
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 04:30:13 +0200, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's why we need a Gimp PRO, Inkscape PRO, Scribus PRO - someone, a
> Firm / Govern / Foundation / Linux Distro / Billionaire ...or a
> mixture of them must hire core developers of all 3 projects - put them
> into a big WEB
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:57:43 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 02:41 +1000, Jasper Schalken wrote:
>> This is what I thought was a bug (I posted
>> herehttp://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432978) but Sven Neumann
>> says I should discuss it on her
lighter than 128 , this does seem to be consistant
with a rounding error.
gg.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:08:21 +0200, Campbell Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> just did a simple test
>
> * 16x16 rgb image
> * select half (vertically in my case) and fill in
> * run the Gaussi
;
> - Image will eventually turn black
> - Happens for RLE and IIR
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png
400 x 200 rect , half black / white.
todays cvs build 2.3.17
repeated gaussian blur filter RLE
as reported earlier, after scores of repeated blur
ink
> there's urgent need to review the plug-in.
I described a large image not affected by border issues and posted a
histogram showing the mean 112 grey level . Since it is not too disimilar
from your test case it's surprising that the results are so different.
Maybe you could post
after multiple iterations.
>
>
> Sven
>
Excellent work! I just reran my test case (which was centred on the b/w
boundry in the middle of the image) and it works almost perfectly after a
very large number of reps.
Now the mean grey values are 129.9 , a very credible result for 8
ntl-F key. Std deviation now 35 against 6.0 before.
Maybe it is in fact an artifact of the changes in the code. Now whether
that is a bug or an improvement in the code I am not sure.
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo.png
http://caoutchouc-detail.com/test-rect-histo-fi
inuing the edge colour would be a better choice for example.
This is a case where it needs to be chosen according to the nature of the
image. There is no "most people want to do ..." solution here.
Your case would represent a block graphic image type and the result is
clearly unacceptable
content.
So in short , no, they cant just be ignored.
gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 07:30:42 +0200, Jasper Schalken
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=434279
>
> On 29/04/07, Jasper Schalken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > You could have a look at the matrix convolution filter code. (Be
>> warned
>> > the
xxx
> xx
>
> Thanks,
>
> Luis.
>
I suspect it got ignored since one pixel offset errors are pretty much to
be expected. I dont recall you mentioning the distortion last time.
could you provide more instructions to reproduce the
etting an answer, specially for Fedora bugs.
>> [...]
>
> Fedora maintainance sucks. Please don't judge GIMP's bug handling
> by Fedora.
>
>> For gg:
>>
>>> I suspect it got ignored since one pixel offset errors are pretty
>>> much to be ex
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:13:03 +0200, Øyvind Kolås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> modifying that code base to deal with this properly will most probably
> been seen as more lasting contributions than changing code that
> eventually only will live on machines running legacy 2.4 series GIMP
> due either
pls ignore.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hi,
after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient
debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that
/opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced.
In fact I noticed it was a couple of days old but the rest of /opt/gimp
was updating to I did rm -rf /opt/
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:40:09 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after bashing my head for several days trying to compile with sufficient
> debugging info to sort out a problem I just discovered that
> /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not getting replaced.
>
> In fact I noticed it was a couple of
7;
'/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig/gimpui-2.0.pc'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/svn/gimp'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/svn/gimp'
Looks like a normal termination, except we see from the results that
/opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3 is not being installed.
On the face of it all seems to
here is a major effort on UI improvement with Peter's
work this seems like a good time to bring these points up.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
I've wasted enough time being lead astray by this so I cant get to the
bottom of exactly what is happening, I want to get back to fixing lanczos
decimation.
The main point is I have a working Gimp and full debugging and variable
eval in kdevelop which is great.
Thanks for your comments.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
ery pleasing to the
eye.
/gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
ad to edit a config file
> manually.
>
Yes in general it's pretty fully featured but I'm sure Peter could do
wonders streamlining it.
I'd suspected that the use of edit was a subconcious carry over from an
early time when this was actually and edit process.
I take it t
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
