On 11-08-14 05:11 PM, Alexander Hämmerle wrote:
> decompose.c:
>
> Including "babl/babl.h"
>
> and simply defining
>
> const Babl *rgb = babl_format ("RGB u8");
>
> in the function extract_hsv without doing anything else brings me to:
>
> fatal error: segmentation fault
> Gimp-Base-WARNING **: 4 ti
On 11-08-17 01:16 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Updated patch available at
> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/0001-Fix-some-memleaks-2.txt
Patch was committed as revision ce3db28f5abe3667a97be3ad2d44a0794efecb16.
Thanks again for spotting the leaks and the patch.
___
On 11-08-16 07:14 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Can somebody verify and commit it, please?
> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/0001-Fix-some-memleaks.txt
Thank you for the patch. There are some minor changes needed before the
patch can be applied.
The patch file should not contain tabs.
On 11-08-11 09:57 AM, Tobias Ehni wrote:
> there is going to be a session on usability for GIMP
> August 12th, 16:00, WilberVille at CCC.
Sounds good. When/where will a report be posted of what comes out of this
meeting?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
John Culleton wrote:
> We also have a whole fistful of plug-ins written in a compiler language.
Most, if not all, of the compiled plug-ins for GIMP (that ship with it) are
written in C.
> 1. In the script-fu examples: functions or modules or whatever within Gimp
> itself are called by certain n
LightningIsMyName wrote:
> and it should be possible to move the meeting to 17:00 GMT. The places
> that will suffer from that decision are Canda and Brazil that will
> have a meeting starting on the morning, but it seems to be as if
> indeed most "dead hours" will be over the ocean.
1700 GMT is 1
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> The last fixed item means that we run all our tests each night now,
> including UI tests.
Um... ok... How does a buildbot run UI tests?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berk
jamessk wrote:
> I am trying create a double button image like this
> www.jkwptest.net/b-login.gif
>
> Do you know how I create this in Gimp? It is possible?
Is it possible? Yes. There is nothing special about that image. It is just
two individual button images placed side by side on a common ba
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 04:42:02PM +0530, shivani maheshwari wrote:
> + out_pixel[3] = (in_pixel[3] == 0) ? 0 : inpixel[3];
There is a typo in the variable name at the end of the line. It should read:
out_pixel[3] = (in_pixel[3] == 0) ? 0 : in_pixel[3];
Now that I'm looking at this,
houghi wrote:
> As these were scripts that were provided by my distro, I assume they are
> somewhat 'standard' for GIMP. To know there are errors in it, is perhaps
> more importand to solve then me getting errors.
> Perhaps a good time to overhaul all the ones that come standard with GIMP.
GIMP 2.
Patrick Horgan wrote:
> Fixed a couple of typos and replaced a deprecated method in
> fuzzyborder.scm so I filed a bug and attached a patch to it.
Thank you for the patch. It looks good. The changes in GIMP regarding
context may require one additional change. I have some code changes for GIMP
to
sourav de wrote:
> I tried to submit the patch in bugzilla, but i was unable to create new
> account there for not getting any email containing confirmation link. I
> mailed bugmas...@gnome.org also, but in vain.
The gnome.org people can take a while to respond at times. Have patience.
_
Gergely Buday wrote:
> I would like to glue a logo and some dozen of pictures automatically,
> ie. the logo and the picture has the same height and to glue them at
> the common edge. How can I do that? Should I use script-fu?
You could write a script using Script-Fu (or one of the other language
The following is a reply to an old e-mail message sent to gimp-devel that
has been bit rotting for some time in my drafts folder.
Andreas Posur wrote:
> Many thanks for contributing to G.I.M.P
yw
> I heard lots of different complains about working with scheme for
> GIMP (mostly: ugly interface
Александр Белобородов wrote:
> want to offer my idea for GIMP project about *fractal image scaling *(like
> Photoshop plug-in "Genuine fractals")*. *
You should provide more details about fractal image scaling. Not many people
on this list will know what the Photoshop plug-in does. I don't know w
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> It has *something* to do with too much gobject boilerplate code.
It's a good thing I asked that we clarify the problem as I was thinking it
was something else entirely. Pointers to a couple of files that show the
issue of a lot of boilerplate code would be good so we
LightningIsMyName wrote:
> *** Optional topic: Re-Discussing GIMP's programming language ***
> Some developers that weren't present in the last meeting, highly
> disagree on the attempt to introduce vala into gimp, claiming that it
> will scare off developers (more than the "simple" C GObject code)
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> The agreement was not to introduce new tools based on old core, and
> GEGL based tool here means underlying GEGL painting infrastructure
> which is simply not ready yet.
Ok. The wiki page says it is for this years GSoC. On my machine the
"Recommended" and "For a late
Robert Sasu wrote:
> I am Robert Sasu and I wrote an e-mail in the morning about the application
> for the Adaptive Image Cloning. Since then I've spoken with mentors on IRC,
> and they said that this project is no more available.
I don't know who told you that or why but Adaptive Image Cloning (a
bhavya agrawal wrote:
> We are Bhavya Agarwal and Kumar Harsh
[snip]
> We can work on the project like *Slicing Tool* or *Implement the free
> transform tool *. Alternately, it would also
> be great if anyone can mentor us in some other project such as -* *
Thank you for your interest in w
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> I've changed "Adjustment layers" to 'Layer filters' for now, and added
> "Layer effects". Ideas for better names are welcomed.
Most of the "effect" plug-ins are under a Filters menu so using "Layer
filters" makes a certain amount of sense.
__
jcup...@gmail.com wrote:
> I might be able to help a little on the forks-two-processes thing. My
> app does this as well, because Windows distinguishes between
> command-line and GUI .exes.
Could you have Windows start GIMP as a GUI program but pass -i to GIMP to
stop it from opening up its windo
LightningIsMyName wrote:
> Users who have a comment on the list should raise it now.
I did mention one possible GSoC idea was a rewrite of gimp-perl. The binding
seems to be a bit of a mess and could stand some clean up. I may squeeze in
a bit more time to make sure it at least works with 2.6 an
>>> * unified transform tool (I remember seeing plans for that last item on
>>> Peter sikking's Blog)
>> http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Transformation_tool_specification
>>
>> You will probably be nicely surprised :)
Definitely surprised. It looks interesting.
A different icon than the small cir
LightningIsMyName wrote:
> said on IRC that she can't point a domain at that adress so we really
> should get wiki.gimp.org running or pay for some web server with the
> GIMP funds.
We can discuss this more at todays meeting. I would like to know what the
problem is with having wiki.gimp.org. GIM
Roger Penn wrote:
> The included script worked just fine before upgrading from 2.2 to 2.6. I've
[snip]
> (define (BulletinBoard_Blue_Header inText inFilename)
> (let* (
> (drawable -1)
> (text inText)
> (filename inFilename)
> (gimp-context-set-foreground '(41 11 169))
> (img (c
Carol Spears wrote:
> i would really really like to have some gimp source from between gimp-0.60
> and gimp-0.9 -- if anyone has kept something like that around.
You will have to do a bit of digging to find anything between those two
releases. Old versions of GIMP source are available via GIMP's
Liam R E Quin wrote:
> What would it take to provide this as an online service, for people with
> existing scripts?
It wouldn't take much to put it online. A webpage where the original script
can be pasted and a webserver that can run Perl scripts.
It won't be able to update for all scripts as t
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> While running the camouflage pattern plugin I saw an error:
Thank you Nelson (and Carol) for the reports and patches regarding Script-Fu
scripts. The GIMP API has been undergoing some big changes in this
development cycle and the Script-Fu scripts have not fully ca
Rob Antonishen wrote:
> Is there any consideration to enabling all the tsx functions?
I included the portion of tsx that I thought would be of the most general
use. One function I did not include (which has recently been mentioned on
this list -- or was it on IRC?) is getenv. I think this would
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
> Script-fu does not provide a way to create subdirectories
This came up in #gimp recently. It would be a useful addition to Script-Fu.
This could be done by adding a "dir-create" function to the ftx extension
used by the TinyScheme portion of Scrip
?ukasz Czerwin'ski wrote:
> Maybe just a good documentation for GIMP source is needed? Once I tried to
> patch TinyScheme interpreter to make it work faster. In files I was working
> on was almost no comments.
TinyScheme is another project with little to no documentation. I would be
interested to
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
> I'd like to apologize to the list. I had responded to Kevin off-list
> because most of my questions were specific to the upstream TinyScheme
> project and had only peripheral impact to Script-fu development.
That's partly my fault. The references
Eric Grivel wrote:
> Which is where my thought of a "boot camp" came in. What if there was a
> group of potential new developers all struggling with the same learning
> curve? Wouldn't it be great if an experienced Gimp developer could lead
> the whole group through a series of exercises, design
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Um, sorry. Somehow I was under the impression that it should work. But
> you are right, it's supported for plug-ins but not (yet) for Script-Fu
> scripts.
Are translations enabled on all plug-ins? What about for Python scripts?
Having taken a look at a plugin just after I wr
Andreas_P wrote:
> But, If I am able to assist here, I'm glad to provide my help...
Thank you. I'll make some announcement when I'm ready to start work on
Tiny-Fu version 2.
> Unfortuneatly, I only really learnt R6RS... I've to learn R5RS/Tiny
> asap...
TinyScheme is closer to R4RS in terms of
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> To me, there is only one sensible scripting language to consider when
> talking about a major overhaul of the GIMP scripting core, and that is
> JavaScript. It is a well-known and understood scripting language with a
> bright future (HTML5)
It is well known in that a l
Seasons Greetings, Saul.
> What would be the best way for me to participate in TinyScheme
> development?
The official webpage for TinyScheme is http://tinyscheme.sourceforge.net/.
It is a SourceForge project so there is a mailing list, bug tracking system,
and a version controlled source code r
anybody wrote:
> I recently got informed that you (dev-community) are planning to drop
> Scheme-support for 2.8++
Feel free to go and flog the person who told you that. ;-) If this was
planned it would be mentioned on the official GIMP website.
> getting a bunch of willing folks who are watchi
Michael Schumacher wrote:
>> Von: Michael Natterer Since the GIMP account is full
>> of money, and I don't use it for anything else that hacking GIMP, I'd
>> like to get it sponsored.
++OK;
> then I'd suggest that you mentor in a future GSoC and let the mentor org
> share of the stipend rest i
Cristian Secară wrote:
> These should be all with space or all without space ?
I would go with a space.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On 09/22/2010 09:05 PM, Abir Sadik wrote:
> This is some really serious violation going on, and i hope someone
> will do something about it. Some people who really dont know much
> about opensource are actually buying from that seller, check his feedback.
People like this pop up on the net an
lloyd konneker wrote:
> An alternative in Python is to bracket a call to gimp_display_new() with
> try:except:, but there is no such alternative in Scheme.
Scheme has the "catch" and "throw" statements. There are some simple notes
about them in the script-fu.init file but that is about it for the
Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> It seems that you and Sven asked me to make two different actions and it's
> useless to do both.
In the e-mail messages I saw you being told of some issues with the patch
but not a one for you to the changes to git. The bug report ensures this
issue and the patches won
Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> I have made several optimizations in loading script-fu extension making the
> loading process a bit faster.
Thank you for the patches. They will be reviewed son. I can't look at them
for another day or two as I'm finishing up some changes on another project.
I would as
bob wrote:
> But I find it an interesting idea that, if it possible to implement in an
> image editor, could help smooth the process of designing web application
> front-ends.
>
> Anyway, I'm just putting it out there to you guys to see what you think.
It might be possible to provide some form of
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
> I hadn't realized that the TinyScheme Extensions had been enabled for
> Script-fu.
Script-Fu in GIMP uses a subset of the TSX (TinyScheme eXtensions) module.
The 'getenv', 'system', and various additional functions which supported
use of sockets
Joseph Areeda wrote:
>* Rotate by an arbitrary angle. I've scanned an image but the page
> was not square in the scanner or camera.
GIMP has a built-in tool that lets you rotate an image by an arbitrary
angle. There is also a Script-Fu plug-in that you can use to straighten an
image an
Nico wrote:
> Is it possible to send data (http and/or ftp) in a script-fu plugin ?
>
It is not possible to do this with a default installation of GIMP.
Socket handling functions exist for the TinyScheme interpreter in
something called TinyScheme Extensions (tsx) which can be found at
http://
On 07/21/2009 06:22 PM, Nico wrote:
> Where can I find this kind of information ? (second part : "how work the
> internationalisation")
Look up the documentation for intltool
(http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/intltool) and gettext.
___
Gimp-deve
On 07/21/2009 03:57 PM, Nico wrote:
> http://www.gimp-attitude.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5904&sid=b4258adb87aec27867805ea3ea02ed91
>
> I have got enough 2 problems :
> - I can't run it on a directory that have a peripheric location on
> Windows (DVD, usb-key...) - look at the SF-DIR return
I can't
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Has anyone been able to find time to look at my patch queue for babl?
One minor thing I noticed is the patch which adds and include of config.h so
it is done in all(?) files. Is it really necessary to include the header even
if it isn't currently needed by some of the fi
Irena Damsky wrote:
> would appreciate a reaction,
> can something like this, or like "colorization by example" such as
> http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~dcor/online_papers/papers/colorization05.pdf
A colourization plug-in could be interesting. Not sure if it could be done in
the time frame of G
yahvuu wrote:
> One minor suggestion, a simple renaming:
> Export...=> Export as...
> Save back=> Export
>
> this way, 'Export' resembles 'Save' as a one-click-action
> and 'Export as...' parallels 'Save as'.
That sounds good to me. "Save back" would be something I've never seen
sanju More wrote:
> I am working on Linux platform ( Fedora 6).
When I was first going through my e-mail I read the above as Fedora 8. If you
are using a Fedora which is that old you will soon discover that a lot more
packages than just XML::Parser are missing or out-of-date on your system.
If
Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
> (I already imagine the headline when GIMP moves to GEGL: "The GIMP
> Starts Smoking.")
That is one possible headline although it should say "GIMP" and not "The GIMP".
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of El
David Gowers wrote:
> As I was working on i18n, I noticed the following string bug in
> app/tools/gimpforegroundselecttool.c:
Thanks, David. Fixed in trunk.
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"Same thing we
C Wang wrote:
> I understand Gimp uses "GPLV2 or later " statement and thus has no issue
> with GPLv3, but I feel it would be better if we can bump it to GPLv3.
If the developers want to change the licence, they can go right ahead and
change it. It makes no difference to me which licence is used.
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> In my opinion these
> alpha-to-logo scripts all give unprofessionally looking results (at
> least all those I have tried).
Feel free to suggest ways to improve the output from these scripts. Or is it
the general effect the scripts are going for which you don't like alpha
David Evans wrote:
> I maintain a port of gegl on MacPorts that builds on Mac OSX without
> problems.
I have been making some changes to the GEGL build process. If there are
changes needed which are required to make it build on Mac OS X, let me know
what they are so that those changes can find t
Luis A. Florit wrote:
> I have a script-fu that worked fine in 2.4 and it's broken in 2.6.
> It had a conditional to apply the layer's mask if it exists. This is
> what it read:
>
> (cond
> ((gimp-layer-get-mask SharpenLayer)(gimp-layer-remove-mask SharpenLayer
> 0))
> )
There are
Pablo Yaggi wrote:
> (if (= (car (gimp-drawable-is-rgb image)) FALSE)
> (gimp-image-convert-rgb image)
> )
The above code is checking the type of a drawable and using this information
to decide whether you need to convert an image.
If you want to convert the whole image to RGB only if it is not
David Gowers wrote:
>> One is finding "islands" in an image
[snip]
>> Another is integrals: zero, first and second moments, or alternatively,
>> integrals/sums of channel intensity, x- and y-weighted intensity, and
>> x^2, y^2 and xy-weighted intensity.
As you stated, the above two features could
Giovanni Rizzardi wrote:
> I'm trying to update an old script (stegano.scm) that uses the functions
> bit-or and bit-and. Both these function should be
> ported from SIOD to TinyScheme but the interpreter raises an exception
> complaining about an "unbound variable".
Those two functions are uniq
Samuel wrote:
> the GIMP Script-Fu engine doesn't make a difference between registered
> definitions and local ones.
[snip]
> It would be nice if GIMP could prefer local definitions to global ones
> or if just registered definitions would go global.
A define placed inside another define can only b
Cédric Gémy wrote:
> Does anyone know what pb could cause this error ?
The atop.c file isn't part of the GEGL source. It would help if you posted the
source somewhere. You are probably missing some include file, missing a
#define, or have a syntax error in the top part of the file.
--
Cheers!
Andrei Simion wrote:
> When applying a pattern called 'GIMP Pattern #1' in 1.2 and 2.4 it does
> not produce the same result. I'd like to know where do the patterns of
> this type reside.
The standard pattern files which ship with GIMP are stored in
/usr/share/gimp/2.0/patterns on a Linux machi
Sven Neumann wrote:
> That's
> why it would be nice if you could isolate the leak or provide enough
> details so that we can reproduce the problem. So far you failed to do
> that.
Andrei may not have isolated the leak to one or two PDB calls but he has
provided a script which shows the growing me
Andrei Simion wrote:
> If one runs a Gimp-Perl script for a number of times, enough to use the
> whole physical memory, then the Gimp server crashes, it does not create
> the swap. That's it, no swap file is created.
>
> I think there may be a configuration issue.
>
> If a test script is needed
Greetings, all.
FWIW, here are my initial thoughts and comments on GMIP and its niw.
The first time I ran GIMP after the introduction I only wanted to run
something from the toolbox menu. I was surprised when I closed the unwanted
window and found that GIMP went away.
I find I'm having a littl
Seth Burgess wrote:
> Way cool on someone doing gimp-perl work again! Sorry I've completely
> abandoned it, but I've got good reasons such as:
Congratulations on your latest "development project"! It is certainly of more
importance than gimp-perl. The only downside being it is a long term proje
Joshua Stratton wrote:
> Right, they MAY have extended that, but I'm asking where you heard
> that. Can you post a link? Also, you said the timeline in the FAQ has
> been updated accordingly. From what I have seen it is not. I'm asking
> why you say the timeline marks the change and it doesn
Kevin Cozens wrote:
> I will open a bug report so this issue won't get lost.
Bug #525016 (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525016)
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"What are we going to do today, Borg?"
Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 |"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree there's not much point in having a complex script like 630 lines
> of proprietary code and reporting it as a GIMP bug. If there is an leakage
> issue here , that this rather extencive use is bringing to light, it
> certainly ought to be fixed but a simple te
Andrei Simion wrote:
> We have installed the Gimp 2.4 and the swap file still grows. For
> instance after generating 20,000 images, the swap file size is 2.5 GB.
I will open a bug report so this issue won't get lost. What version of GIMP
2.4 did you install? You can find the full version number
jbaker wrote:
> o What would really be nice and make the dropzone a lot more
> usable... if there is was a file browser built into it...
> split the niw vertically, put a file browser on one side,
> and dropzone and whatever else on the other side...
I
Andrei Simion wrote:
> We have installed the Gimp 2.4 and the swap file still grows. For
> instance after generating 20,000 images, the swap file size is 2.5 GB.
If this is still happening in GIMP 2.4, a bug report should be opened against
the gimp-perl component. It would also be a place to att
Andrei Simion wrote:
> We have installed the Gimp 2.4 and the swap file still grows. For
> instance after generating 20,000 images, the swap file size is 2.5 GB.
>
> The script that is causing problems has 630 lines of code. Do you want
> me to copy-paste it here, in the body of the email?
Send
Andrei Simion wrote:
> If yes, I work for them and I saw that you modified some scripts there.
> We installed 2.2 version and I made sure the scripts properly generate
> the images we need.
I haven't met you. I was mainly dealing with Allan D., Chris C, and Trevor. I
had let them know that 2.2
Andrei Simion wrote:
> I run Gimp 2.2 on a Red Hat machine. The Perl scripts delete the images
> that are created by using gimp_image_delete. Even so, the swap file is
> created and it inflates significantly. For instance, after creating 250
> images its size is of 2.7 MB.
I have done some work
Greetings, Lorelei.
Based on your introduction, there are several GIMP related projects you could
work on. In regards to the Python related project, the main person to speak is
Manish Singh.
I am interested in your work with Scheme as my main involvement with GIMP
revolves around Script-Fu and
Bill Skaggs wrote:
> The script can be made to work in Gimp by adding one line:
[snip]
> (write-char #\space port)
>
> as you do, and if "port" is not the current output port, then
> scheme saves the value of the current port, sets the output
> port to "port", performs the write, and t
Paul Langevin wrote:
> I've asked "script-fu" yahoo group where no-one seems to know the trouble.
> Can someone here tell me, please, why this script works perfectly well with
> Windows:MIT/GNU-Scheme and fails on Windows:Gimp2.4.4/TinyScheme ?
I had asked you for a more readable version of your s
Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:16 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
>> This feature would be of enough general use that it should be available to
>> all
>> scripting systems.
>
> I don't see this as a feature that the GIMP core would implement. It is
Sven Neumann wrote:
> What about the possibility to add an example image as proposed in bug
> #520066 ?
It would be a useful feature. Again, it isn't on my ToDo list for Script-Fu.
This feature would be of enough general use that it should be available to all
scripting systems.
It would need to
Luis A. Florit wrote:
> But I do not know if these are possible in script-fu, and I didn't
> find a complete enough reference for script-fu.
There is some documentation about Script-Fu at http://www.gimp.org/docs/. I
have been putting together my own set of documentation for Script-Fu which you
Luis A. Florit wrote:
> I want to do these on the plugin option window:
>
> 1) Gray-out some options according to checkboxes;
> 2) Add arbitrary text, horizontal lines, boxes, or something like that.
You can't do either of the above in Script-Fu. Adding new parameter types to
allow adding
Brennan Sellner wrote:
> I'm developing a reasonably complex plugin for GIMP 2.4 in C++ (using GIMP
> and libgimp 2.4.2 on Ubuntu 7.10), and am currently having trouble with a
> Heisenbug: after running my plugin with a particular set of parameters,
> when I exit GIMP, I often (~90% of the time
Andrei Simion wrote:
> Let's say I want to pass this font 'FrutigerBold bold Italic normal'.
> What is the new format of this font for version 2.2 of Gimp.
Would you believe that it is simply "FrutigerBold Bold Italic"? Use the name
of the font followed by the style modifiers.
BTW, why are you
david wrote:
> My proposal to correct this in Linux is as follows, it adds the overhead
> of a second call to g_file_test but retains the return code structure
>
>if (g_file_test(filename, G_FILE_TEST_IS_REGULAR) && !g_file_test
> (filename, G_FILE_TEST_IS_SYMLINK) )
> retcode = F
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> - I've loaded a tif file (43M) - called Colors -> Curves - got a SIGSEGV
>
> Attached the gdb session
From the gdb session messages:
> Removing duplicate PDB procedure 'file-psd-load' registered by
> '/opt/gimp-2.5.0/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/psd-load'
In late Decem
William Skaggs wrote:
> 2) Added an "invert" control, so that you can see the edges as dark
>lines on a light background. Without this, the preview is almost
>useless. I did some voodoo to make "invert" the default for
>interactive use, but not to change the result when "edge" is call
Jim Sabatke wrote:
> My free time on the file hosting site I've been using is almost up. I
> had several suggestions before that I should upload the files to the
> plug-in registry site. I may be missing something, but it looks like I
> need some sort of special privileges to do that.
Look at th
Laurent G. wrote:
> I have been fighting the evening long, trying to give data through such
> an array.
[snip]
> I followed the "trick" of inserting an int32 before the array in args,
> but I keep getting my plugin to explode gimp on my calling to my simple
> procedure, at least while calling from
Sven Neumann gimp.org> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 13:16 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
>> The first is to take, if possible, the "tools" dialog, and incorporate it
>> into the "toolbox" tab in the preferences. Then remove the tools dialog as
>> a separate dialog.
> That's reasonable and it
Greetings.
The Script-Fu plug-in in GIMP 2.4 uses version 1.38 of TinyScheme. There are
about 8 bug fixes to that version of TinyScheme listed in SourceForge. Most of
these fixes have not been applied to the TinyScheme used in Script-Fu.
I would like to apply most, if not all, of these fixes to
Marcus Heese wrote:
> so as I've already written a few weeks ago in my mail about the new features
> for the text-tool in the PDB, I'd like to contribute especially in that part.
> As far as I understood the discussion about the roadmap, the PDB will get a
> little rework for the 2.6 release (na
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:30:16 Andrew Young wrote:
> Please excuse the noob question. Why are there no odd numbered releases?
> e.g. 2.5? Do they have a special, internal role?
It has been a long standing tradition amongst many (open source) programs that
odd numbered minor numbers indicat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok not many photo retouching program, but krita is here. An also, i've
> to apologize, i'm beginning myself using ... Blender... even for
> photo-retouching and compositing, even if it is not its main purpose
I don't know why you would have thought of even trying to us
On 8/29/07, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> - Alt+Ctrl moves the selected pixels.
> - Alt+Shift moves a copy of the selected pixels.
That seems backwards in a way. To make it easy to remember which moves (ie.
shifts) the pixels and which moves a copy it would be better the other way
around. The C from
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
