--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
This measurement conflicts with early arrival time data for
neutrinos from supernova. The New Scientist article quotes
Marc Sher of the College of William and Mary in
Williamsburg, Virginia, It's not reasonable. ... If
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
In the CERN OPERA results, neutrinos arrived about
2.48x10^-5 the travel time sooner than expected. For a
168,000 ly trip the expected photon arrival delay time Dt
should be
Dt = (2.48x10^-5)*(168,000 yr) = 1521
days =
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
I believe I alluded to something like this earlier.
In reading back over previous emails, yes, you're right.
In a universe which adheres in general to the SR model, you
can, none the
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jouni,
I am not certain I follow quite what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting
that, possibly, the absolute frame of reference may have differing velocities
based on the velocity of the local object? I.E, some planet,
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Yeah. Bien sur. The whole issue isn't that some
religious law might be broken; it's that you can get
contradictions if we allow stuff like this to go on without
careful controls on it, and short cuts, improbability
physics,
Test...
--- On Sat, 2/20/10, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Census Community Survay..what is the remedy if I fail to
produce?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
First, I'm pretty sure that it's a misdemeanor at worst,
and there isn't
--- On Sun, 2/21/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:TEST
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, February 21, 2010, 10:34 AM
Another test. I have not been able to post
messages.
- Jed
Came through OK here, Jed.
I've
V,
With some spare time over the weekend, and little to do (a rarity), I decided
to make a crystal-less crystal radio. Inspired by Nyle Steiner's work (google
him, he is a god among amateur scientists), I conducted a couple hour's worth
of experimenting with using flames as a detection method
Frank,
I'm late in replying, as I usually am, what with how my life generally is...
Don't give up. I may not say much these days, but I read your messages. Keep at
your work.
--Kyle
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
All good points, Kyle. The only individual I can think of
that is trying to
reverse this trend is Dean Kamen, inventor of Segway.
Segway is also not
practical but it's still an impressive product that has
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMQEiRWoiJw
Is it practical? No. Was it fun? Oh yes.
Better page: http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/flame-amp/flameamp.htm
I know Nyle's pages are better than mine, that's why I linked to
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Just for fun...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 10:22 AM
In the (non-ecclesiastical) category
of 'nothing new under the sun'
Here is an article that
--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Unspeakable . . .
I can't bring myself to read this.
See:
Witness: Mallove asked for help before he died
I read it, unfortunately.
This is awful. I cannot imagine the mindset of a person who would not do as
he asked.
--- On Fri, 5/21/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Sorry for the long delay in replying, it was a... rough week.
I used that same substance, different mixture. More sugar,
I think, and I used it for smoke bombs, it burned slowly
with copious white smoke, basically harmless.
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, and all:
Another I'd add to the list is, we assume they would use radio waves or optical
(laser) communication (ala COSETI). Some other medium may exist, which we
either cannot use effectively at the moment (neutrinos) or
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
At a distance of 1 light year, a dish with a radius of 100
m would pick up grand
total of 3E-22 W from a 10 MW transmitter on Earth. I don't
think there are any
10 MW transmitters, and even if there were, a signal that
small
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
To put this in perspective, in order to pick up 1
micro-Watt in total from our
10 MW transmitter, the dish would have to have a radius of
6 million km.
BTW the *closest* star to Sol is 4 ly away, not one.
1uW is a lot of
--- On Sun, 7/18/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I seem to recall that measurements on some supernova
indicated that the neutrino
burst and the x-rays arrived at the same time. IOW
neutrinos don't travel faster
than light. (Only tachyons do that ;^)
On the one hand...
In my
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm . . . What about up-links to geosynchronous TV and telcom
satellites. Or, if a civilization expands beyond one planet (but not
interstellar), what about interplanetary communications?
I don't have any data on hand about
V,
From http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part6/section-12.html
I did some calculations (assumes I did the arithmetic right) for a dish with an
aperture of 10,000 meters. Such a structure could be conceivably constructed in
space, using either one massive construct, or arrays of smaller
--- On Tue, 7/20/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If it was an interstellar communication and it happened to
impinge on earth, it would have stayed pointed in our
direction for a long time. Ditto for a deliberate signal to
attract our attention and announce the existence of
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... a true character ... but I'm not so sure the Dime Box
was fictitious ?
The romantic in me likes to think it was real. Maybe not in this plane of
reality, whatever it is, but *somewhere*.
I liked R.C.
We talked quite a bit
--- On Sat, 1/29/11, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Big Picture
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2011, 4:57 PM
This is an unknown nuclear reaction for crying out loud! A NUCLEAR
REACTION. It is not a
On 11/13/2011 1:15 PM, Vorl Bek wrote:
I have had it with Mary Yugo.
I think Mary Yugo is a good addition to this list.
Mary Yugo's skepticism is better than excusing Rossi's odd
behaviour on the grounds that he must be an eccentric genius.
I have no idea if Rossi is a scammer or if he
--- On Wed, 11/23/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Most interesting! Garnet is desirable because it
inherently transmits light differently in one direction than
in another: It has a different index of refraction — the
bending of light as it enters the material — depending on
V,
Whatever side of the aisle you fall on with regards to Rossi, you got to admit,
given his slap-it-together plumbing style, a Lenard ray tube built from a booze
bottle, kitchen foil, and hardware store crap is right up their alley.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FYVBsGCUVg
Gotta admit,
There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark.
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
By the way, I'm disappointed by all the Mary Yugo bashing. I
did not find MY's skepticism to be severe or particularly
extreme, compared to plenty I've seen.
Well, as a semi-interested outsider who'd love a cheap
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
As the one who 'rode her ass' a number of times, I have said
that her (his)
technical criticisms were WELCOME... but to lay off the
focus on the
personalities.
Good idea. Discussing the science and analysis of the
1. well, since theres been testifiying in front of
congress and leaks
and unaltered originals sent to media, yeah,
actually, we do know for
sure.
I'm just saying there is a lot more to this whole
situation than meets the eye, on both sides.
2. the us is a signatory to the un. the us
Dear Vortexians,
I am quite sorry I ever got into this thing, and if I
have wasted bandwidth, I do apologize. This will
likely be my last message on this subject.
snip Iraq did not attack us, etc.
period.
The addition of the word 'period' makes it that much
clearer then? No, Iraq did not
--- Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SNIP
In short, causality isn't really violated, it only
appears that way to an observer relying on EM signal
transmission for his/her information.
[snip]
This could be argued from a certain point of view in
the one way FTL sense. But if we
Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed that
information cannot be
transmitted faster than the speed of light.
Hmmmthe writers of the quoted article have made an
error in the above statement. It would be more correct
to say that it is confirmed that within the
experimental proceedures
Harry Veeder wrote:
Synchronisation is done beforehand.
e.g. Synchronise two clocks at the sender's
location.
Then move one of the clocks to the receiver's
location.
Problems arise here, due to relativistic effects. If
you move one of the clocks, its time will be different
than that of the
--- Standing Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Listers
I would like to say that IMHO any photons
actually measured at greater
that 'c' would be enough to shake the foundations of
the Einstein religion
to its very foundations. And I do mean .ANY
photons!
My thoughts on this
Hello all,
The recent discussions of FTL signalling and its
repercussions is interesting to me, and is something
which has troubled my mind for many years. After
studying special relativity, particularly the
implications of relativity of simultaneity and the
rejection of absolute separation of
--- John Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if real, how do you explain the laser beam being
bent?
According to what I read, that is inconclusive at this
point. Further, a gravitational field ale to bend a
light beam is approaching the surface gravity on a
neutron star, thus you won't need
--- Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you say, I wouldn't expect the
permeability
of the rod to matter much, given the geometry, but
a permeable rod would tend to be drawn in and stay
in the center counter to what is seen.
Also notice upon observing the photos on Jean-Louis'
Hi all,
Interesting discussion, particularly where it comes to
deal with engine sizes, etc.
My occupation is that of an auto mechanic. It is only
by night that I become the mad scientist. ;)
I work primarily on european manufactured cars. They
are fuel efficient, have all the high technology
--- RC Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He predicted the
coming generations would be so accustomed to change
that change would become a habit.
I can see some good coming from this, and also quite a
bit of bad. There is enough crap being floated around
by my generation today. Of course a lot
Vanity of vanities, all is vanity
Truer words were never spoken, it seems to me as of
late. Indeed it seems to me that we live in a world of
nothing but hatred and negativity, where no one
believes in anything greater than what has gone
before and that we are on a continuing Archimedian
Vortexians,
OK, this is getting a little crazy-go-nuts.
1. Margaret Sanger was responsible for some good, yes.
She was also crazy. Not the kind of person I would
want to spend much time with. Very pro-eugenics. If
you support that, then congratulations, go build
yourself a private Gattaca. Leave
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabulous!
I've been saying for years (mostly to my
long-suffering family) that the
biggest thing wrong with the way our petroleum
policy is run in this
country is that there should be a federal gasoline
tax which keeps the
price per
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip glamourous description of Europe
Then move there.
My employers are German. They came here because it is
increasingly hard to make a decent living there. I see
them 5 days a week and they tell me all about it,
whether I want to hear it or
--- Stephen R. Lawrence
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe higher transport costs will change all this,
but at the moment I
don't quite see the mechanism.
From: Stephen R. Lawrence, 8 Supanee Court, French's
Road, Cambridge,
England, CB4 3LB. Tel/Fax +44 1223 564373
Ah, so you already live
--- Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$27k to $32k depending on location and political
preference. :-)
http://tinyurl.com/63t3m
Bleah. I don't make enough to even begin to afford
that. Most people out there drive used cars because
they cannot afford a new one. Much less something like
Howdy,
Unfortunately, as my good friend John Schnurer is no
longer of this world, he can't do this with me, so
I'll have to do his share of it. He loved mischeif,
even towards the end when his Parkinson's made it
almost impossible for him to type (and sometimes
communicate at all) effectively, so
--- OrionWorks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm impressed!
Knock yourself out tonight!
Heh, thanks Steven. I /probably/ was being mostly
sarcastic in my evil plan statement of action, as
I'll probably be making Hartley oscillators all night,
as well as chasing down the rumors I hear from a
...or Petrol, depending on from where you come.
$3.87/U.S. Gallon here in western NY.
Crazy, considering that when I moved here six years ago it was about $1.50.
Yay-big increase.
Now, as I was in a somewhat contemplative mood earlier, I decided to sit back
and see how this really affected me.
Horace,
I don't know if this would have any bearing on, or be any help with this
thought experiment you are working on, but there is a paper describing the
theorized energy density within various cavities, authored by the late Dr.
Robert Forward. I have it in PDF format if it would be helpful
--- On Fri, 7/4/08, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'd appreciate a copy.
Alrighty. I'll put it online in a bit and send you the URL. Probably be better
that way, as it is a bit large, at 1.2 megs. I don't want to be rude and direct
email something that big.
Say, that was
Horace,
File uploaded.
http://www.fdscience.org/1/aiaa983140.pdf
--Kyle
Vortex,
This discussion over whether or not Shawyer's theory is correct or not is
pointless and the wrong subject. You can prove or disprove anything if you have
enough mathematical and speculative handwaving to say what you want to say.
The two points that SHOULD be very carefully considered
Mark, and all,
You're worried about something minor compared to producing what, in worst case,
could be American Brownshirts.
See:
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/129949.html
Before I go further, no I have not reviewed other content on that site, so I
don't endorse anything besides what the
--- On Tue, 11/11/08, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: They'll take a friggin' mile... And your little people,
too!
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2008, 11:19 PM
I suggest I-Thank-You's (money created
--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking for myself, I don't respond to things like
that because it is
embarrassing. I mean, I pity you. You need to take a deep
breath and come to
your senses.
I don't need your pity, or anyone else's. I don't do the whole handout
To Jed, and all Vortexians who are still here:
Most likely, this will turn out to be nothing.
I said that. So I think I covered my ass previously. If the above sentence is
too difficult to understand, I'll try to explain it better. R.C. Macaulay could
probably say it better, and more
Thomas, and all,
As far as 'electrogravitics' goes, I can speak to this
a bit, as I've experimented with it for quite a number
of years.
The first thing I'll say is, Townsend Brown obviously
meant something different by electrokinetics and
electrogravitics. This is glossed over in modern
times.
All,
Here's a question regarding a bit of fiction I am
writing as a side project.
What would the radiation effects be of a hypothetical
pure-fusion nuclear weapon? That is, a nuclear bomb
containing no fissile material whatsoever, triggered
by some other means. The following scenarios are used
Google neutron bomb.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Already know about them, read Cohen's articles and
all. What is described by 'neutron bomb' still
contains fissile material...albeit not alot. Still
some fallout, but the amount of fusion fuel is very
limited, so there's a
--- leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pure fusion would be a so called neutron bomb
high emp, lots of radiation, little blast. if they
worked, you could
basically drop a few dozen, instantly kill most of
the population,
wait a year, go in and use all the land and
buildings and such,
--- leaking pen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fast neutrons can cause physical damage, de
magnetize things, and
cause other issues, but i was under the impression
that it would only
cause actual nuclear reactions with certain ALREADY
radioactive
species. and i cant find anything online to the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While true, all those energetic neutrons have to go
somewhere. They will do two
things:-
1) While still energetic they will damage other
nuclei, producing radioactive
species.
2) When absorbed by other nuclei, they will also
create radioactive species.
In
Hmmm.
Considering that for the time period between Christmas
and New Years, that the following took place at my
home:
1. Freak high-velocity winds took the shingles off my
carport.
2. I got the flu.
3. Someone stole my garbage can (not the wind, the
winds were dead calm that day.)
4. I
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not think so. In ~4.5 billion years the sun
will be a Red Giant, and I
think the wavelength and power of the light will
change considerably before
that.
http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Lectures/vistas97.html
As far as I can
. . . . . . This isn't aimed at any one person, but to
all who are of the likeminded mentality which I am
finding myself anathema to.
Which one of you built the Georgia Guidestones? Or
maybe some drunk from the Dime Box Saloon built them.
If so, they're excusable as a funny prank.
I don't have
For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been
scratching their
heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their
giant detector.
snip...
Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them
with an
explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the
noise before he knew
they were
--- OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
My wife could not live without chocolate.
Mine either. She'll kill for it.
P.S.: IQ of 200 does not mean a person is not
stupid.
...Only that one's stupidity is more ingenious.
I get a sudden mental image of Wile E. Coyote,
assembling
--- OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Years ago, I watched a number of late evening RL TV
shows that aired.
Almost invariably they all started out with
unimpressive cartoon skits
depicting Bubba doing something stupid, insofar as
conservatives
were concerned. Ok... I stand
actually told the American public we need to grow
up! Talk about
audacity! Telling a bunch of overgrown children to
stop acting like
spoiled ninnies . . .
Jed,
Talk is cheap.
First point, I hope Obama DOES make things actually
better for us. It's crazy to hope that he fails so
badly that
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Alright, two can play at this game. You fellas want
to further
pollute Vortex with this shit . . .
Speaking for myself, my remarks on this subject are
carefully
considered, well researched and calm. I do
Okay, here's my input from a mechanic's standpoint.
Guys like me keep you driving. Jed, this includes you,
and I have worked on Prius' (Prius's? Priuses? What
DOES that name mean?!?) before.
1. Applying emissions restrictions to new vehicles is
not that big of a deal, as far as I am concerned,
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
I have never heard of retrofitting older vehicles
with emission
controls. In any case, the main concern is for CO2
and this cannot be
reduced in an older car by any means.
No, they just want to boot them off the road
--- thomas malloy temall...@usfamily.net wrote:
If I were appointed the car czar, I would require
the vehicle's design
to be reviewed by a panel of mechanics.
That's a bloody good idea, speaking from a mechanic's
point of view. The trash being sold for $20k+ these
days is absolutely
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Late model gas furnaces are better than 85%
efficient, but of course
they do not generate electricity!
Oil burners are up to 85% these days, some even
better. I think some SlantFin furnaces are a bit
higher. Nevertheless, I loathe oil heat. For
Vortexians, left, right, center, up, down, backwards,
sideways, snakebit, and/or whatever
political/religious/etc. leanings you may have:
A few points, directed in seemingly random directions
at no one party (all seem equally guilty here), but
maybe not so random?
1. Someone should go read the
--- Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Asteroid 2009 DD45 had a 48,000 mile close call
March 2, 2009. What
has not explicitly been said AFAIK is whether or not
that was within
a window that can establish a resonant return,
i.e. a direct hit on
a return fly by. Perhaps it
[snip]
I thought it *was* detected by someone paid to do
exactly that?
Not paid very much it seems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siding_Spring_Survey
And someone else tracked it after the discovery by way
of funding provided by The Planetary Society.
This is not the scale of skywatch
--- John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only way we can realistically do anything is
if we have technologies
or friends that we don't generally admit to, I
hold out no hope for a
mission as in the movie Armageddon or lasers or...
We can do it with nuclear weapons, either a direct
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As I wrote repeatedly, we can LOTS about volcanoes.
We can't stop
them, of course, but we can prevent them from
killing people or
damaging equipment unnecessarily. We can mitigate
the danger and
financial loss. Horace Heffner also
--- Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
A couple hemispherical metal salad bowls might work
and are not too
pricey at Wal-Mart.
Good idea. I will get a couple of them, split some
vinyl tubing down the side, and wrap the lip to
prevent corona.
Noticed Bill Beatty did some
Hi,
Okay, as per Horace's suggestion, made a crude
spherical (er...kind of spherical) terminal out of two
mixing bowls. Didn't go to WalMart, as that place
frightens me, so I got them from Kmart. Duct taped
them together at the seams, so as to make a crude
corona seal. It works very well,
--- mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Mon, 9 Mar
2009 19:58:55 -0700 (PDT):
[snip]
I thought that in Podkletnov's experiment the device
was a superconductor, and
that the electron pairs in the superconductor were
mandatory to getting an
effect?
The SC
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm curious -- why is common grounded? Seems like a
hand placed too
near it would reward you with holes blown through
the soles of your
shoes as a result, no?
Wouldn't it be safer to let the hot parts of the rig
float?
A few reasons why
All,
Another update. Didn't get as much done today as I'd
like, as I did end up getting pretty sick.
Nevertheless, here's what I did and what I found.
I took the original 'target' plate, connected to
ground, and shielded it with a 7.75 square sheet of
.125 plexiglass. A 1/2 hole was drilled in
--- Nick Palmer ni...@wynterwood.co.uk wrote:
If you're going to waste energy, you might as well
have fun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJqoRaphiEk
Nick Palmer
On the side of the Planet - and the people - because
they're worth it
Argh...resending to the list. Apologies in advance
. . . .
Alright, I don't really know how to start this, so I
won't. I'll just start hacking away into it. What's
the deal?
Now maybe I'm reading this wrong, but there's a bias
it seems against any results, theoretical or
experimental, that have a superluminal result. What's
so %^$%# bad about
--- Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know what become of Robert L Cook? His web
site has been
closed circa Dec 2007 but is available on
archive.org (see
forceborne.com)?
Don't know much about Cook, myself.
Also, I noticed in the Laithwaite
patents (approved
--- mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Since a = f/m, and m is constant, if there is a
force in one direction only,
then that force should accelerate the mass while it
operates. That acceleration
should increase the speed, which should then remain
constant until the next
acceleration pulse. IOW
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
I suspect not. CF (or LENR) is finicky, and no one
is yet certain of the precise
requirements (though there are now a few claims of
complete replicability).
Those who can achieve it have been trying for
quite a while to get it right.
Even
--- grok g...@resist.ca wrote:
But the Mylow HoJoRotor is _exactly_ the kind of
thing you can do in your
garage -- or on the kitchen table, even. However,
people are flat-out
stating that the magnets are giving up their
magnetic energy as they
de-magnetize. If this be the case -- then
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
1. Mass M is moved say 10 units to the right by
precession, thus (supposedly) forcelessly. F=0 at
this
point.
This is a neat trick.
He he he. Let me add this: neat trick... /if it works/
If you can do this you've already shattered
V,
Since there's apparently little to no interest in
learning what I found re: the Morton effect, or what
I've done/am doing with Laithwaite's inertial
propulsion work, or discussing faster than light
travel, implications thereof (resistance to in
sci-community/effects and/or testability of
--- leaking pen itsat...@gmail.com wrote:
Being a young American citizen is a crime now, I
suppose.
Where have you been? Being a kid has involved a
significant lack of
the normal human rights you normally get the moment
you turn 18 for a
LONG while now.
Well, I was mostly referring
--- Rhong Dhong rongdon...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't know why people are getting worked up about
O's national service proposal: plenty of countries
have or have had that. The US had a draft from 1940
to around 1972 and it didn't destroy liberty.
1. We are not other countries. If we can't
--- Mark S Bilk m...@cosmicpenguin.com wrote:
Kyle, I haven't read all of your posts, but if you
achieve
positive results in any alternative physics areas,
by
all means tell us (and post the complete details of
the
apparatus to hundreds of lists, in order to preserve
your
life).
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Kyle, you do cool stuff. Your posts about stuff
you've done are always
interesting, sometimes fascinating, often extremely
entertaining. Don't
think nobody's interested, just because there are
not a lot of comments!
(Politics is easier to
V,
Alright. I will try this again, and we'll see...what
we can see.
WHAT HAS GONE BEFORE
Charles Morton reported an effect (a series of
effects, actually, but we will only concentrate on
this one) wherein a beam of force of an unusual nature
is generated by a high voltage discharge coming from
--- Rhong Dhong rongdon...@yahoo.com wrote:
I assume you are talking about the HitlerJugend. Boy
scouts from what I hear. Got the kids into clean
country air, got them to clear brush, live in tents,
take responsibility.
Just what O wants to do.
Stop being part of the problem and start
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
