to the response.
(Or maybe this step should be done by the response when it is
given the result of the call.)
I think this last step would allow you to hook something up.
I'd love to get suggestions if people have any ideas of how
this might work.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PR
on :-)
In particular, he needs to provide a traceback, either from the program
output
or log or from the error reporting utility.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation
.
:)
Later this week, I'll toss a tar file up with this packaged catalog
for others to play around with.
Cool.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Co
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
On 6/6/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
1) the intid utility is used to maintain an object<->integer ID
mapping for use as a document ID in catalog indexes. Given that the
objects already have an integer ID, _p_oid,
_p_o
is probably the right choice.
Sorry, I missed the second part of your answer. You should not store meta data
on the reference objects. You should use the reference objects (or intids) as
keys into data structures storing meta data.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pyt
also depends on the
version of ZODB. My assumption is I would have to write some sort of a
migration script.
Zope 3.1 should be able to read Zope X3.0 databases without any special
conversion.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540
guess we just haven't needed
non-ascii character sets in page template sources up to now.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
for others, we
should require a name.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope
tective work is needed first. This isn't failing for me.
I imagine that this isn't failing for most people.
Alan,
What specific OS are you running.
What is your umask setting?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540)
loped for some time, which is really a shame.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zop
important.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Z
defines via ViewPageTemplateFile, then:
return self.template()
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
ticular
security policy. If a site uses a differeny security policy, they
will have to actually rewrite the zwiki zcml file.
The buddydemo application has *very* little application logic,
which tends to inflate the configuration/code ratio.
For 3.1, both of these packages zcml files could be shortened
normal way to do it yes.
When my content interface *inherits* from an interface, this seems to
work... but when my class *implements* an interface, this appears not
to.
I don't know what you mean.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
likely.
If you can reproduce this problem in a simple/contained test, please add an
issue for it.
What is the correct way to do what I'm trying to do?
The simplest way would be to comment it out.
That doesn't work if the configuration is not yours.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Dylan Reinhardt wrote:
On 6/23/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dylan Reinhardt wrote:
When my content interface *inherits* from an interface, this seems to
work... but when my class *implements* an interface, this appears not
to.
I don't know what you mean.
Perh
using an adapter.
Some people feel very strongly that you should never test for an interface
-- I don't.
It seems silly to add an adapter just to avoid using a test
(for religious reasons iow).
In particular, providing adapters to handle cases where an object
doesn't provide some service and
put in the textarea field for boom when I try to add
a foo object.
This is a bug. Please submit it to the collector:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev
Thanks.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
...
+
+
+def renderItems(content, start='', repeat='%s', separator='',
end='', **kw):
+if IMenuItems.pr
Chris Withers wrote:
And I'm pretty sure that Zope 3 needs Python 2.4 ;-)
No, Zope 3 works with Python 2.3. Some add-ons might require 2.4.
Of course, Plone doesn't work with Zope 3.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
Yes.
> Or is this something that should be
in the FTPView's implementation?
No. The FTPView isn't actually modifying the object, the IWriteFile
viw is. It's possible that the write-file adapter could be modifying
a different object than the one it adapts.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
e 3.1, and 3.0.2 (if there is a 3.0.2).
If you gave questions about this, please send them to the Zope 3
users list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporatio
e 3.1 finally nearing
completon.
Jim
P.S. I'd like to remind everyone that there are just 3 months left before
the feature freeze for 3.2. :)
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope C
301 Moved Permanently ( http://svn.zope.org)
That is not an svn repository. It is a viewcvs view of the
svn repo.
Use: svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/branches/ZopeX3-3.0/src/zwiki
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540
ve an idea about why get this error?
Nope, sorry.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_
27;ll be able to blend classic Zope 2 facilities,
like Python Scripts, with Zpe 3 facilities.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.z
, that's not much of an explanation.
Andreas, we didn't think response.write was being used. What are you trying to
do?
Stephan, we may have to provide backward compatibility. since it's in
Philipps book.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pyth
,
as we've discussed.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-users
pe/etc/package-includes/securitypolicy-meta.zcml",
line 1.0-1.62
ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File
"/home/florian/Zope3/src/zope/app/securitypolicy/meta.zcml", line 4.2-7.51
SyntaxError: invalid syntax (constraints.py, line 240)
You are still using Python 2.3.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton ma
Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Freitag, 30. September 2005 20:08 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Freitag, 30. September 2005 18:55 schrieb Julien Anguenot:
Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. September 2005 20:25 schrieb Julien Anguenot:
First have a look at this :
http
roblem.
BTW, you should not pass the "context" argument to the component-lookup
functions *unless* you want to find a component in a different site.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.pyth
created
in Zope. A tell tale sign is you can no longer delete the broken
instance(s)
This sounds like a bug. Could you report this with a specific example?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.py
tead inside the ZODB? By introducing a new
RDBMSFieldProperty that handles the set/get methods in the same way as
the FieldProperty implementation?
Possibly. It depends on the RDBMS integration strategy. If you
were using Ape, you'd probably use the existing field storage.
Jim
--
Jim Ful
vents based on the
object and event. You expect something similar to be going on for workflow
events, but I suspect there isn't.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporat
Tom Dossis wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Tom Dossis wrote:
Leticia Larrosa wrote:
I get the following error:
"""
'Service' object has no attribute '_SampleContainer__data'
"""
I implementend a simple subclass of SampleContainer, then changed
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zop
t;)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/unittest.py", line 309, in failUnless
if not expr: raise self.failureException, msg
AssertionError: spawned process failed to start in a minute
Is this serious? How could I get this test to pass?
Don't run the tests as root.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 16:26, Jim Fulton wrote:
AssertionError: spawned process failed to start in a minute
Is this serious? How could I get this test to pass?
Don't run the tests as root.
I see this error sporatically using a non-root user as well. I
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 16:26, Jim Fulton wrote:
AssertionError: spawned process failed to start in a minute
Is this serious? How could I get this test to pass?
Don't run the tests as root.
I see this error sporatically using a non
major problem, since Steve is safely ignoring
the error. Thanks for the quick replies! I read some posts from August
that mentioned that it may just be an issue of a slower machine (my
machine has a few other processes running on it). Increasing the error
threshold to something higher may be what
e known
that the change will be included in 3.3 unless people discover serious
client-compatibility problems created by the change. You could use this
release or the trunk for your xmlforms experiments.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
hich is an intermediate thing. :/
The bottom line is that this test needs to be rewritten.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://ww
rsion, rather than taking intermediate steps.
Assuming that the best way to catch up is by running all evolution scripts
from (before) the beggining is guessing too much.
In summary, I think that the installation script is the right way to
handle this situation.
___________
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It is valid both to:
- Declare an interface for a built-in type and
register adapters for that interface, and to
- Register adapters for builtin types directly.
I can't promise that this works now, but it ought to work.
I'm 90% sure that
em as unobtrusive as
possible. (If you work hard, you can avoid them altogether,
but I don't expect most people to work that hard.)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporatio
might be nice to have easily-configured alternate policies. For example:
- require @@, as you suggest
- log a warning, or possible raise an error in development mode, if, when you
get an item, you also find a view with the same name.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
This is a matter of policy. It is straightforward to change. Many
people hate
@@ and the ++view++name syntax. They will often arrange their item
and view
names so that they don't overlap.
How hard is it to plug in different url parsing? It&#x
Andreas Elvers wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
This is a matter of policy. It is straightforward to change. Many
people hate
@@ and the ++view++name syntax. They will often arrange their item
and view
names so that they don't overlap.
How hard is it to plug in diff
Andreas Elvers wrote:
Hi,
I really think the service stuff should be moved to a place like
"deprecated terms". Is it possible to get editing rights for this wiki
page ?
Yup.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540
as
a ZODB.interfaces.IDatabase with the name given in
zope.conf. If you you have only one database and it
doesn't have a name, then you should be able to look
up the utility without supplying a name.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540
? ;)
Any thoughts?
I'm guessing that you are using Zope 3.0.
The registration of databases as utilities wasn't added
until 3.1.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope C
ore clearly document how to return long output and I'm going to add a
method that generates a hopefully helpful error.
Note that we may add this method (or something like it) back in the future
to support chunked streaming output,
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
When we refactored the Zope 3 pubisher to work more closely with WSGI,
we decided to remove the response.write method. We should have written
a proposal for this, but we failed to do so. Over the last few
e too.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-
ion in the form of a "starter
package" could help here?
Yes. I'm hoping that the ArchGenXML project will produce that for
Zope 3. I wonder how that work is progressing ...
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-17
however, is that its
> greatest value is being able to *query* the configuration. It lets you
> answer questions like "where are all the views named update.html?".
> That's valuable independently of the format of ZCML.
This would be a good feature to add to apidoc.
Jim
-
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zop
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
When we refactored the Zope 3 pubisher to work more closely with WSGI,
we decided to remove the response.write method. We should have written
a proposal for this, but we failed to do so. Over the last few weeks
there has been much discussion
the use case is also directly addressed through
containment constraints. You can say that a container
should only contain objects of some given types and you will get
just those types in the add list.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
Florian Lindner wrote:
Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 17:45 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Florian Lindner wrote:
my first use case is that I want to enhance the HomefolderManager to make
it possible to select something else than a Folder to be created
automatically
The release can be downloaded at:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope3/3.2.0b3
I plan to make a final 3.2.0 release on Thursday or Friday.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corpor
Tim Peters wrote:
[Jim Fulton]
I've made a source release of Zope 3.2.0 beta 3. I plan to make a
Windows release tomorrow, when I have access to a windows machine with
a compiler, unless someone beats me to it.
I gave it a try, but it dies near the start of the process:
$ \pyt
file or directory:
'/home/marco/zope3.2/bin/ftesting.zcml'
+++
This is very odd. I can't reproduce this.
I have installed Zope 3.2 b3 on Windows also and I haven't noticed any
problem so far.
Maybe you should try the linux installation process again.
Is anyone else seeing
know what's going on?
For some reason, a database connection wasn't closed properly.
Is there anything special about your setup? Is this a plain
Zope install? Are you using ZEO? Are you using a single database?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python
database
(mountpoints in Zope 2) isn't always joined correctly to the set of
connections of the multidatabase, and thus not closed correctly when the
main connection is closed. I'm still waiting for feedback about this on
zodb-dev.
Yeah, I know I need to get to this.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Marco Groppo wrote:
Il giorno mer, 04/01/2006 alle 19.07 -0500, Jim Fulton ha scritto:
Did you have the problem with beta 2?
Sorry, I'm an idiot. Yesterday I didn't read the access log, so I didn't
notice that the problem was Firefox... The problem was due to a Firefox
exten
Marco Groppo wrote:
Il giorno gio, 05/01/2006 alle 09.01 -0500, Jim Fulton ha scritto:
Of course, this doesn't explain the test failures or the "Shouldn't
load state for ... when the connection is closed" errors.
I've reinstalled Zope and now the functiona
n. I doubt that you can
change the developers' minds about that.
To be fair, "ready for producton" is not exactly crisp. People with sufficient
knowledge are running it in production, and therefore it's fair to say it is
ready.
It is still a new and somewhat immatu
them much less. Of course that was a long time ago.
Does anyone know of more recent data?
Of course, if you can segregate your data, you can get higher
transaction rates by employing multiple database servers, ZODB
or otherwise. I've faily confident that this is what you'll
need t
ng like the Berkeley database that
we could build on.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
speaking like yourself)
Yeah, it's a plot to keep me from talking about releases. ;)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com h
rst database defined is used as the root database.
Zope 3 doesn't support mounting, but the same functionality
is mostly trivially obtained using the ZODB multi-database APIs.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714ht
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Zope 3 doesn't support mounting, but the same functionality
is mostly trivially obtained using the ZODB multi-database APIs.
Well, ok, then mounting support could a nice sprint topic :)
Maybe, I'm not really sure it is necessary
On Jun 22, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Much of the value of the Zope 3 mounting code
was in getting around the limitation that cross-database
object references weren't supported.
Does Zope 3 still have the idea of "one big tree" of object with
p
On Jun 26, 2006, at 6:17 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The default Zope 3 configurations still organizes objects into a
tree.
Path identifiers are no longer used.
How do you now uniquely identify an object?
First, you usually don't need an independent unique id f
6:59 AM, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim. Where should this be done (separate identifier). I was
thinking of a UUID of some sort when I read this which could be
helpful for other things.
Regards,
David
Jim Fulton wrote:
If you do need a separate identifier of some kind, you can
use a key
-configure.zcml
bugtracker-configure.zcml
Removing these files will also avoid problems when you update your
checkout later, as these will refer to non-existent packages.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO
On Jul 8, 2006, at 11:49 AM, David Pratt wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Recently, a serious security flaw was found in Zope 2 due to it's
improper support for allowing reStructuredText to be edited
through-the-web. reStructuredText has directives that allow
inclusion of any file a
t least in
the short run. I don't think it's a good long-ter solution.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation
s already provides such a document. It's there documenation.
Whoever made reST available TTW didn't read it. Providing another
document that people won't read won't help the situation. Whenever
we reuse 3rd-party code or write, we need be aware of security issues.
J
re in the furture that shouldn't be exposed
through the web. Whenever we integrate a new version, we need to
review it to make sure there aren't new security issues. This is
especially true of anything that is exposed TTW.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[
zope.org, I logged
in but I
don't know how to edit this page. Is this a permission problem?
Yes. This wiki isn't open to everyone with a zope.org account, due to
spam problems in the past I believe.
Yes, but access is pretty easy to get. Just ask me. :)
Jim
--
Jeff Shell wrote:
... now what?
I just tried moving some work over to Zope 3.3. Already things are
blowing up.
What do you mean by blowing up?
We certainly tried to make 3.3 backward compatible.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO
t:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev
Please include information about whether this was a PPC or intel mac
and the OS version.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://w
collector,
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope3-dev.
It looks like Zope's file stream object that it passes to
the CGI module needs to grow a maximum size.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:00:05PM +0200, Thierry Florac wrote:
Le mardi 24 octobre 2006 à 07:51 -0400, Jim Fulton a écrit :
Torvald Bringsvor wrote:
I have set up Zope 3.3.0 with Python 2.4.4, and it
didn't quite work. Some operations such as adding a
content o
ce we don't know what patches may be
been installed, or what might change in updates applied by a sysadmin.
Lets not forget: or what might have been left out by the system packager.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540
the
same "app" variable set and ready for use.
Of course you can use the lower-level ZODB APIs to open the database
yourself.
Note that you'll want to use ZEO if you want to open the database while the
web application is running.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
AFAIK.
- is it possible with Zope3 to setup cache size ??
Of course, using the same option in the zope.conf file.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http
~/Projects/Zope/Zope3/One2One rob$
Any idea what causes this?
No, I have no context to begin to understand it. I don't know what
121 and One2One are.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://w
PIs haven't changed. It's really a question of best practice
and that evolves over time. We created a formal API, getName,
because we were queasy about exposing __name__. In practice, there
is no other implementation and using __name__ is cleaner in a lot of
ways, IMO.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
.buildout have been used for Zope 2 applications
for several years at ZC.
BTW, if you want to learn more about zc.buildout, then a good way would
be to attend the minitutorial I'll be giving at PyCon nect month:
http://us.pycon.org/TX2007/TutorialsAM#AM7
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailt
ify a
project name after the #.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
___
Zope3-us
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
I'd rather discuss questions like this on the distutils-sig list.
Okay? Is that a Zope list or a python one?
Python:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
In Gmane?
Probably. :)
easy_install le
standard output, it is the standard
output logger that affects the transcript log. IMO, it is
silly to log to two places. I would just log to standard
output. (The only problem with this is that older versions
os zdaemon don't support log rotation. I have fixed this
in the latest version o
Heads up!
Assuming that I can figure out how to do so, I'm going to disable the
Zope 3 collector today in preparation for switching to Launchpad.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO (540) 361
for making
this happen!
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Python
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporationhttp://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
with the right
semantics would be useful, but there isn't a way to do it in
setuptools. We can achieve the same effect on the server. For
example, with this software, you could chain several KGSs together.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
ou can use the mirroring approach (maybe with some minor
tweaking) to combine KGSs on the server.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
Zope3-users mailing list
Zope3-users@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
