Linux-Networking Digest #716

1998-12-30 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #716, Volume #9  Wed, 30 Dec 98 15:13:56 EST

Contents:
  Dynamic IP Name Servers (Daniel Goh)
  Re: Support for IBM auto-LAN-Streamer Token Ring card (Alexandre Dulaunoy)
  Re: PPP connections dropped with _some_ Netcom dialups (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Q: NE2000 or not on Linux? (Leighton Shank)
  Re: ppp headache ("Randy Hao")
  COMPUTERCRAFT archives of Linux USENET groups (COMPUTERCRAFT)
  Re: Help with automating fetchmail (peter)
  Re: FTP Server (Alexandre Dulaunoy)
  D-Link Card ("Roger A. Prata")
  Re: Linux PPPD considerably slower than in Windoze (Valentin Abramov)
  Re: PPP Dialin with RH 5.2? (Philip D. Wasson)
  NFS mount with ksh - user hung on login (Mark Langanki)
  IP from Netbios ("M. Brian Akins")
  Re: Help with automating fetchmail ("Jonas")
  Netscape Plug-in dir? (Roy Prowell III)
  Re: Netscape Plug-in dir? (Barry Miller)
  No multilink with 3COM Impact IQ/Linux 2.0.34 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: What is IPX for ? (Valentin Abramov)
  Printing from NT to Laser on Linux Server. (Jerry Walter)
  ml.org botched MX records: who to talk to? (Stephen van Egmond)



From: Daniel Goh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dynamic IP Name Servers
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:19:07 +0800

Hi,

Does anyone know of any site that provides name servers for people with
dynamic ip addess something like Dynip.com but one which is free.

Thanks.

Daniel



--

From: Alexandre Dulaunoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support for IBM auto-LAN-Streamer Token Ring card
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:57:30 +0100

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==0C15B77D1457CB51DD8F4E16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

Alan Cox is currently working on a driver for Lan-Streamer.
But it's alpha code, ask him.

alx


Erik wrote:

 Hi there,

 I was just wondering if anybody out there knows wether the
 IBM-Auto-LAN-Streamer PCI Token Ring card is supported by LINUX.

 Thanx in advance,

 Erik

==0C15B77D1457CB51DD8F4E16
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="adulau.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Alexandre Dulaunoy
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="adulau.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Dulaunoy;Alexandre
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fn:Alexandre Dulaunoy
end:vcard

==0C15B77D1457CB51DD8F4E16==


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP connections dropped with _some_ Netcom dialups
Date: 30 Dec 1998 08:28:56 -0600

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

: Hello,
: I am experiencing the following situation.  When I dial into the New
: Brunswick, NJ Netcom POP, I am able to properly establish a PPP
: connection using pppd.  However, when I dial into the Boston, MA or
: Cambridge, MA Netcom POPs, I cannot properly establish a PPP connection;
: the line is dropped after successfully authenticating my username and
: password.  I invoke pppd as follows, as per Netcom's guidelines:
: 

: pppd /dev/modem 38400 defaultroute modem crtscts lock domain
: ix.netcom.com ipcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote noipdefault debug
: 

: Doing so produces the following debug output:

: 

: Dec 30 01:05:59 daisyhill pppd[307]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: Dec 30 01:05:59 daisyhill pppd[307]: Using interface ppp0
: Dec 30 01:05:59 daisyhill pppd[307]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/modem
: Dec 30 01:05:59 daisyhill pppd[307]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 magic
: 0x99aac58b pcomp accomp]
: Dec 30 01:05:59 daisyhill pppd[307]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 magic
: 0x99aac58b pcomp accomp]
: Dec 30 01:06:01 daisyhill pppd[307]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xa asyncmap
: 0xa auth pap magic 0xc1d59c58 pcomp accomp]
: Dec 30 01:06:01 daisyhill pppd[307]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xa auth
: pap]
: Dec 30 01:06:01 daisyhill pppd[307]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xb asyncmap
: 0xa auth chap 05 magic 0xc1d59c58 pcomp accomp]
: Dec 30 01:06:01 daisyhill pppd[307]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xb auth chap
: 05]

The ISP wants PAP or CHAP authentication and you're not set up for either.

You need to configure for PAP or CHAP and perhaps remove the chat
login/password expect/send lines.

snip repeats PAP/CHAP requests/rejections



--
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */

--

From: Leighton Shank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Q: NE2000 or not on Linux?
Date: 30 Dec 1998 17:06:39 GMT

danpel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 But should it be NE2000 or not? I've seen some d-link card 

Linux-Networking Digest #718

1998-12-30 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #718, Volume #9  Wed, 30 Dec 98 19:13:32 EST

Contents:
  Re: problem testing out my modem with Kermit ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PPP Options Setting for PAP Dialin Server? ("Adam")
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have  (Michael)
  Re: RC.INET (Josef Elias Norgan)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! (Rick Moen)
  Re: Connecting to the @Home network/General network configuration ("T.Ganesan")
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Newbie modem problem ("Tim Hedger")
  Automatic ppp-2.3.3-4 up? (Ian Anderson)
  Re: Successful connection to Earthlink? (J Scott Berg)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  DEC21443 and Tulip ("MalcolmX")
  Re: mediaone cable and small home lan questions (Jason Sutherland)
  Re: how hard is it to setup 2 computer network? (Ed Anderson)
  samba and netatalk ? (Dennis Thompson)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: problem testing out my modem with Kermit
Date: 30 Dec 1998 21:58:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

: Stephane et Sophie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: : I would like to try out my modem using Kermit (6.0)
: : before configuring the ppp connection with my Redhat 5.1,
: : as it is suggested in the howto.

: : Warning: terminal type unknown: "xterm"

If this is the Kermit RPM, there is a small bug, using it on Redhat 5.1
It is looking for a terminfo directory that doesn't exist.
I don't have  RedHat available at the moment, but as I recall, you now have
a /usr/share/terminfo, where the package expects /usr/lib/terminfo.
To fix:
cd /usr/share
ln -s terminfo ../lib

After that, it worked fine.

I used /dev/modem as my port, which is linked to an appropriate port,
if a modem is found.

-- 
---
Clarence A Dold - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Pope Valley  Napa CA.

--

From: "Adam" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PPP Options Setting for PAP Dialin Server?
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 12:42:22 -0500

Ok, I'm having rought times. We're trying to set up a dial-in service at
work. Win95 machines need to be able to access the network as if it were a
NETBUEI system as well as check email and access the World-Wide Web.

What I've done so far, I can see the Linux box I'm dialing into, but the
rest of the network is unaccessible. I've followed everyone's instructions
(thanx Josh and Charles), but can not see past the computer I've dialed
into. Any suggestions as to why?

Laters,
Adam

(the xxx's represent irrevelant IP numbers)
dial-in client: xxx.xxx.3.1 (win 95 client box)
Linux box I'm dialing into's IP address: xxx.xxx.0.92
Domain Name Server: xxx.xxx.0.1
Primary Wins Server: xxx.xxx.0.3 (Win NT server, for netbeui)

Netmask: 255.255.252.0

==
/etc/ppp/options:

asyncmap 0
proxyarp
crtscts
modem
lock
ms-dns xxx.xxx.0.1
ms-dns xxx.xxx.0.2


/etc/ppp/options.ttyC7 (using a Cyclades card, all are set the same for now)

xxx.xxx.0.92:xxx.xxx.3.1
defaultroute
netmask 255.255.252.0
ms-dns xxx.xxx.0.1
ms-dns xxx.xxx.0.2
auth
-chap
+pap
login
modem
crtscts
lock
proxyarp

==



--

From: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have 
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:28:15 -0500

THE DUNGEONS OF DOOM wrote:
 P.S:
 PLEASE DO NO TELL ME TO USE ANOTHER VERSION OF UNIX SINCE I KINDA AM
 USED TO RH LINUX. ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME HOW TO PARTITION MY HARD
 DRIVE SINCE MY 75. GB HARD DRIVE IS NEARLY FILLED UP. I PLAN TO
 INSTALL REDHAT LINUX 5.2 TO MY OLDER 730 MB HARD DRIVE SO PLEASE DO
 NOT BRING IN 7.5 GB INTO THE PICTURE UNLESS YOU ARE GONNA GIVE ME A
 FREE CD-RW DRIVE FIRST !!! ALL I AM ASKING IS THAT YOU GIVE ME A
 SOLUTION FOR THE PROBLEM I GOT. DO NOT GIVE ME IRRELEVANT BULLSH**
 SUCH AS TELLING ME TO PARTITION MY OTHER HARD DRIVE. I WILL CONTINUE
 TO POST THIS MESSAGE UNTIL SOMEONE HELPS ME FIX THIS PROBLEM !!!

Well, with this attitude, I'm not even going to think about
trying to help this guy out.

 
 Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
 past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
 
It figures... I'm gonna post this message repeatedly until
someone helps me WAHHH!!! and he doesn't see the connection
to having his account terminated?

Set 

Linux-Networking Digest #723

1998-12-31 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #723, Volume #9  Thu, 31 Dec 98 02:13:48 EST

Contents:
  Use Linux as an NFS host, ie export files to other unix boxes ("Mark Schpaira")
  Re: how to connect (ppp) with a windows nt machine that dials back? (Job eisses)
  Re: Ethernet/Token Ring and Cabletron Switches (Kazin)
  How to set speed on an EtherExpress Pro100+ on RedHat5.2 ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Dial-up automatically when traffic to the Internet is detected (on-demand), can it 
be done? (Chee Choon Cheng)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! (Marc)
  isdn problems (Jason)
  Re: Netscape Plug-in dir? (Arthur Chiu)
  where's a good HOWTO? (Marc)
  Re: Newbie modem problem (Daniel Tarsky)
  NIS and group access (Ed Breen)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Michael Powe)
  fetchmail problems... (Nicholas Barry)
  Re: Human based computers (Was   -   Fruit-based computers) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  SAMBA...  (Maddog)
  Re: Please Help on @Home SEtup (Paul Whitmer)



From: "Mark Schpaira" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Use Linux as an NFS host, ie export files to other unix boxes
Date: 31 Dec 1998 04:46:39 GMT

Having trouble setting up RedHat Linux 4.2 on a Sparc to 
1. accept remote commands such as rsh.
 Whenever a client attempts to execute the rsh or rcp commands
  the message "Permission denied" appears.
2. export files to be mounted as NFS mounts.
  Whenever, I attempt to remote mount a file exported from the
   Linux server the same "Permission denied appears" 

I have noticed two things that seem to be missing. First there is no
program like exportfs that is present on other unix systems, although the
file /etc/exports is documented. 

Second, the files /etc/hosts.equiv and .rhosts are not documented in Redhat
Linux. Are they needed, or is the tcp wrappers package sufficient.


--

From: Job eisses [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to connect (ppp) with a windows nt machine that dials back?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 02:02:41 +0100

Bert Eding wrote:
 When I run Windows NT at home I simple use a dialup connection and the PC at
 work will dial
 me back in a few seconds, after that I can browse the internet.
 I want to do the same but now I am running Linux (Read Hat 5.2) at home, How
 can I get this working?

All i managed to do was getting the PPP to the RAS server running,
the dial back is probably negotiated in the PPP handshake and i have
seen nothing about dialback in the PPP source. It would be nice to have,
i did think about writing to the guy that made the MS-Chap in ppp,
but never did. Maybe you will get around to it.-job

--

From: Kazin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Ethernet/Token Ring and Cabletron Switches
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:34:40 -0500

Volker Dormeyer wrote:
 
 Hi!
 
 I have a serious problem in our switched Ethernet/Token Ring
 environment.
 I can´t ping (IP) from a Linux Box (Kernel 2.0.36) in the Token Ring
 segment
 to i. e a Windows NT Workstation in the Ethernet segment.
 
 Only when I reduce the MTU-size on the Linux Box to Ethernetsize (1500
 bytes)
 it works together with the NT-Workstations and some IBM AIX machines.
 
snip
 
 Some time ago I observed the same behaviour with a XyLan OmniSwitch.

I observed the same problems also, but on SynOptics token-ring hardware
and Bay ethernet hardware.  We ended up making the MTU size on all the
token-ring machines down to 1496.  I don't know if the problem was ever
*really* resolved, I left the company.  But I doubt it's your hardware,
I bet it's NT... :)

 
===
  Mike Stella Software / Systems Engineer
  http://www.sector13.org/kazinThirteen Technologies, LLC
===

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to set speed on an EtherExpress Pro100+ on RedHat5.2 ?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:55:20 GMT

Hello, everyone!I have a Dell 4300 server at work which has a PCI
EtherExpress Pro100+ installed (not on-board).  It is being seen fine and
comes up (on the hub which has 10/100MBpS speed indicators) as 100MBpS. 
However, we want it to come up at 10MBpS.  I am assuming that the driver
defaults to the highest possible speed. How do I switch it down?  Is there
any way at all?  The technician at intel said that there might be a command
line switch for the driver, but how and where would I set it?  The driver
loads straight from the kernel, not as a module. Please let me know, I am
eternally grateful to all.

Thanks,
Kaushik

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 

Linux-Networking Digest #724

1998-12-31 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #724, Volume #9  Thu, 31 Dec 98 07:14:35 EST

Contents:
  PPP ("Jason Tedor")
  Re: make an Internal net (Omegaman)
  PPP Problem (Jason E Tedor)
  Re: Newbie modem problem ("M. Wijtkamp")
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! ("James 
Barley")
  Suck/INN Configuration Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Experience with Fireplug's Linux Edge Router ? (Stuart Lynne)
  RH5.2  a Cable Modem (Travis Zimmerman)
  Re: How to use Tape Backup ? (No Spam)
  Re: Problem setting up homenetwork with 3c509b. (Ville Nummela)
  Re: How to set speed on an EtherExpress Pro100+ on RedHat5.2 ? (JunkDTectr)
  Re: Debian and EtherExpress 16 (JunkDTectr)
  Re: Netscape Plug-in dir? (Melchior de Contades)
  Re: Help with automating fetchmail ("Jonas")
  Re: Dial-up automatically when traffic to the Internet is detected (on-demand), can 
it be done? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PPP/CCP problem (James Carlson)
  Re: Dial-up automatically when traffic to the Internet is detected  (Dan H)
  Re: Newbie modem problem (Rob Clark)



From: "Jason Tedor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: PPP
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 10:57:24 -0900

Hello,

Running Linux 2.1.132, ppp2.3.3, with ppp support compiled as a module.

I am having trouble configuring PPP so that it works. Right now I am trying
to establish a manual connection (i.e., trying to connect through minicom,
quitting without resetting the modem and running pppd). I first ran into a
problem where ppp compress/decompress are not being loaded when needed.

From /var/log/messages

Dec 29 10:27:06 kashmir kernel: Serial driver version 4.27 with no serial
options enabled
Dec 29 10:27:06 kashmir kernel: ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
Dec 29 10:27:06 kashmir kernel: ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the
University of California
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir kernel: PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir kernel: registered device ppp0
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir pppd[509]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir pppd[509]: Using interface ppp0
Dec 29 10:28:20 kashmir pppd[509]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/modem
Dec 29 10:28:22 kashmir modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
Dec 29 10:28:22 kashmir modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-24
Dec 29 10:28:22 kashmir pppd[509]: ioctl(SIOCADDRT) device route: Network is
down(100)
Dec 29 10:28:22 kashmir pppd[509]: Connection terminated.
Dec 29 10:28:23 kashmir pppd[509]: Exit.
Dec 29 10:29:39 kashmir kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
unregistered

I averted the problem my manually inserting the modules bsd_comp.o and
ppp_deflate.o with insmod. Why isn't kerneld loading them as needed? What
can I do to fix this? But my for my major problem, I get the message
ioct(SIOCADDRT) device route: Network is down(100). What is going on here?

Thanks,

Jason



--

From: Omegaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: make an Internal net
Date: 30 Dec 1998 22:34:39 -0600

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Carver) writes:

 I'm not the original poster, but the question is valid and deserves an
 answer. Unfortunately I don't have one. I have, perhaps, a similar
 problem. I don't have a network, just two computers that I'd like to
 network. If everything works perfectly that would be great, but Linux
 isn't exactly plug and play. It would be nice if it were possible to
 just work with one network card and somehow verify whether it's
 working properly or not. Through weeks of testing I've come to believe
 that Linux is flakey on both machines, but it would still be helpful
 if I could isolate one machine at a time for testing.

If you have an available serial port on each machine, pick up a null
modem cable.  Pick a class C (private) network address for each
machine -- say 192.168.1.3  192.168.1.4.  The very last page of the
ppp howto shows the pppd command that needs to be executed on each
machine to initiate the linkup.You can then ftp, telnet, etc at
will between the two machines -- as long as those services are
enabled. 

If one of the machines is connected to the Internet, you can install
IP Masquerade (see the mini howto) and use internet resources on
either machine.  A serial link is slow, but it is useful and makes for
a good simple learning experiment.

Hope that leads you down a good path.


-- 
=(( http://home.gs.verio.net/~omegam  ))==
Omegaman[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | "When they kick out your front door,
   PGP Key fingerprint =|  How are you gonna come? 
   6D 31 C3 00 77 8C D1 C2  |  With your hands upon your head,   
   59 0A 01 E3 AF 81 94 

Linux-Networking Digest #726

1998-12-31 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #726, Volume #9  Thu, 31 Dec 98 17:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: Cannot get Linux to see two nic cards (rich johnson)
  Re: How do you enforce equal sharing of bandwith under IP masq? ("Aaron")
  Re: linux proxy or nat (Stephen Carville)
  Re: Win95 system gets wrong DHCP addresses (Michael Derousselle)
  Re: How to use Tape Backup ? (Gary Momarison)
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. ("Dennis McGrath")
  Re: RC.INET (Mark Drummond)
  Re: Win95 system gets wrong DHCP addresses (Michael Derousselle)
  'route' command reports only 1 line (Denis Rousseau)
  Re: Win95 system gets wrong DHCP addresses (Chris Weiss)
  Re: FTP server - my stupidity? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: samba and netatalk ? (Alfred Anheier)
  root login in telnet ("wkchiu")
  Redhat 5.1 as MS Proxy client ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: FTP Server Accounts (Daniel Goh)
  Re: Cant Connect to Internet (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Fat 32??? (Brent Rader)
  NETGEAR (tulip driver) problem ("min song")
  Re: PPP Options Setting for PAP Dialin Server? ("Adam")
  Re: PPP/CCP problem (Andrew Sun)
  Re: Sharing my UMAX Astra 610s scanner w/ UMAX Scan Manager v1.2, using SANE (Redhat 
5.2 Linux) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:56:15 -0800
From: rich johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cannot get Linux to see two nic cards

snip

 compuware.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:768clg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 If a try to ifconfig eth1 (ifconfig eth1 10.1.1.1 255.0.0.0)  I get
 SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
 SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
 
 I have tried MULTIPLE types of cards.  What I have in the box now is two
 PCI
 cards one Intel and one 3com.
 
 Both work if they are the ONLY card in the box. If bothare in the box only
 one will work (the intel card)
 
 I've also tried it with two 3 com cards (one pci and one isa) if I do this
 only the pcicard works.
 
 Also tried it with two isa cards (only one will work)
 
 THanks.
 

If the cards are pci, then there SHOULD be a utility supplied by your PC vendor
to set the base addresses and irqs for your cards so they don't conflict.  I bet

that they do.  Unfortunately, some vendors supply pcs without such configuration
tools.

For example, a Dell P133 (I have one... I know) from 95-96 era does not
supply this pci config software.  See Donald Becker's Vortex page located
at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/ for more about that..  As is suggested
there, you CAN swap the cards around in the pci slots. This should
sort out the addresses and irqs for you (worked for me!).

If you have a 3Com509B ISA card, it can be configured by getting the latest
source from Mr. Becker's site (or from a recent vendor distribution?) and
compile the driver code into the kernel (I couldn't make it go compiling the
driver as
a module ... your mileage may vary).  I compiled version 1.16 of 3c509.c (see
comment in top of the source file).  You will want to follow the instructions
found
at the cesdis.nasa.gov site for this card to set the addl parameters in your
lilo.conf
file that will allow you to set an irq and base address that the intel card IS
NOT
using (and none of your other cards use either).

Good luck.


--

From: "Aaron" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How do you enforce equal sharing of bandwith under IP masq?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 14:01:44 -0800

I believe you can do this with the squid proxy server.
Will have to have a dedicated machine for that though.


Lee Reynolds wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a network in my house with 4 computers attached to it each of
which uses the the linux server as the gateway to the internet through
IP masq.  The problem we are having is that sometimes one user's
connection hogs all the bandwidth and leaves nothing for anyone else.
So my question is whether there is a way to limit bandwidth under linux
or more ideally modify that limit based on the number of computers
currently connected.  If there is a howto or other documentation about
this, please let me know.

Thanks,
Lee Reynolds



--

From: Stephen Carville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux proxy or nat
Date: 31 Dec 1998 19:22:59 GMT

x wrote:
 
 how do i set up dial on demand for my to windoze machines going out the
 linux box.
 
 i dont want twenty four hours a day access.

I use the c-mserver and ipfwadm at the linux end.   I intalled tkmasqdial
for the linux boxen and Charles Wright's WNT/95 client on the Win boxen.

For more info see:

http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html
http://cpwright.villagenet.com/mserver/

TkMasqdial is available as an RPM at:

http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/index.html

This assumes you have a working ppp dial-up connection...

-- 
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Management: The art of hiring intelligent, skilled 

Linux-Networking Digest #727

1998-12-31 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #727, Volume #9  Thu, 31 Dec 98 19:13:44 EST

Contents:
  Cant Connect to Internet ("ali")
  Re: root login in telnet (Alexander Brinkman)
  Re: login delay with ftp or telnet (Paul B. Brown)
  Re: Cable Modem - Watch Out! (Jim Roberts)
  Re: Automatic ppp-2.3.3-4 up? ("Dan Sheehan")
  Re: Can't telnet to linux machine after upgrading to RH5.2 (Stephen Carville)
  does anyone know how I can view another terminal remotely (Daddy Rabbit)
  Re: ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument (ALPHA) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Help: PPP connection problems (Suds)
  need paging software for linux (Daddy Rabbit)
  Quick-n-Dirty Secure Card Dialup (avery)



From: "ali" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cant Connect to Internet
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 03:04:38 +0200

Hi!!


I'm a new linux user and have been trying for days to connect to the
internet without success.
(My configuration information can be found below)


Simply put:
I can dial in to the server but can't successfully establish a ppp
connection. ie. running ifconfig only reports the results from my loopback
device. After Entering my username and password (from minicom) the server
starts a ppp session i think (I see a whole lot of garbage on the screen)
and after a while, minicom reports NO CARRIER and the modem disconnects

I've included in this messege all the information about my configuration
that I could think of.
(Information can be found below)

Any and All help will be appreciated.

Thanks Ali



I'm using Red Hat Linux 5.0 (Kernel 2.0.31) and PPP ver 2.2 and a Microcom
28.8s Deskporte internal modem

I've successfully compiled PPP into my kernel.
I've tried connecting using Minicom and from the command line using the
command

pppd connect 'chat -v "" ATDT8453000 CONNECT' /dev/cua3 38400 noipdefault
debug crtscts modem defaultroute

I've tried configuring my system to use PAP as best I could. A list of my
configuration files and their contents can be found below (at the end of the
messege) if it helps



# I've Included the output from one of the sessions when I've tried to
connect:

Dec 30 18:42:21 localhost pppd[266]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Dec 30 18:42:43 localhost pppd[266]: Serial connection established.
Dec 30 18:42:44 localhost pppd[266]: Using interface ppp0
Dec 30 18:42:44 localhost pppd[266]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/cua3

Dec 30 18:42:44 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:47 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc4 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:47 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc4 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:47 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:49 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc5 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:49 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc5 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:50 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:50 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x1 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:50 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x2 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x3 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x4 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x5 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x5 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x6 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x6 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x7 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x7 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x8 mru 552
asyncmap 0x0 magic 0xd445 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc6 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc6 asyncmap
0xa auth pap magic 0xad6cf662 pcomp accomp]

Dec 30 18:42:51 localhost pppd[266]: rcvd [LCP ConfNak id=0x8 mru 1500]

Dec 30 18:42:51 

Linux-Networking Digest #730

1999-01-01 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #730, Volume #9   Fri, 1 Jan 99 01:13:31 EST

Contents:
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (jedi)
  USR 56K PnP problems in RH 5.2, slow port? ("Tom Shealy")
  Re: Routing grief... (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: Basic ISDN PPP Routing Question? (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: Fat 32??? ("JF")
  3C589D in RH 5.2? ("Nick Payne")
  Re: Do I need common files to upgrade Netscape Communicator? (Stuart R. Fuller)
  Re: How to set speed on an EtherExpress Pro100+ on RedHat5.2 ? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  More 3c574 problems. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Ip masq.again (Jason Brossa)
  Re: Ip masq.again ("mct1")
  IP masquerading problem ... Please Help! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Michael Powe)
  Re: ftponly ("Graham Miller")
  Re: Gateway Woes ("Graham Miller")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 16:29:07 -0800

On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 19:07:25 -0800, Dennis McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Normally I do, but occasionally they ask for a email response. It's a pain
dealing with the anti-spamming addressing. What we need is to have a
government with the balls enough to do something about it.

People who send out mail should just have a clue, or better
software, such that when they mail people (as opposed to posting
public messges) people can easily respond...




Dont reply to people - reply to the NG.  Most of the spammers dont seem
to be smart enough to remove NOSPAM.  Regardless of what Mr. Yohe says.
My inbound spam is next to nothing with the altered return address.


-- 
Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats
  
Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out   / | \
as soon as your grip slips.

In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com

--

From: "Tom Shealy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: USR 56K PnP problems in RH 5.2, slow port?
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 22:53:45 -0800

I'm having trouble with my USR 56K PnP modem under RH 5.2 (it's not a
winmodem).  When I start a connection (with any terminal...ezppp, minicom,
etc.) the modem dials and connects, but the connection is VERY slow.  (It
takes several minutes for only 3 lines of text to appear!)

I have the modem in an isa slot.  I have BIOS Version: 4S4EB2X0.86A.0009.P03
(from a new intel se440bx-2 motherboard), and "PNP OS" is off.  I installed
isapnp and created an isapnp.conf file from the info given by pnpdump.  I
suspect the problem is PnP related, but I was wondering if anyone had any
advice?  I did a complete RedHat 5.2 install.  Do I need any special
packages?  Do I have to configure any port speeds or settings?  Has anyone
had any similar experiences with a usr PnP modem?

The only thing I can think to do is disable the PnP features of the modem
with the jumper and configure it normally.  But, before i do that, here's
what isapnp says:

# isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf
Board 1 has Identity 58 f7 b5 9a a9 70 30 72 56:  USR3070 Serial No
4155873961 [checksum 58]

(I also see that at boot time)

Here's my /etc/isapnp.conf...(I made it from pnpdump, and just deleted all
but the first "multiple choices" :


/etc/isapnp.conf
# $Id: pnpdump.c,v 1.15a 1998/05/25 17:22:16 fox Exp $
# This is free software, see the sources for details.
# This software has NO WARRANTY, use at your OWN RISK
#
# For details of this file format, see isapnp.conf(5)
#
# For latest information on isapnp and pnpdump see:
# http://www.roestock.demon.co.uk/isapnptools/
#
# Compiler flags: -DREALTIME -DNEEDSETSCHEDULER
#
# Trying port address 0203
# Board 1 has serial identifier 58 f7 b5 9a a9 70 30 72 56

# (DEBUG)
(READPORT 0x0203)
(ISOLATE PRESERVE)
(IDENTIFY *)

# Card 1: (serial identifier 58 f7 b5 9a a9 70 30 72 56)
# Vendor Id USR3070, Serial Number 4155873961, checksum 0x58.
# Version 1.0, Vendor version 0.0
# ANSI string --U.S. Robotics 56K Voice INT--
#
# Logical device id USR3070
#
# Edit the entries below to uncomment out the configuration required.
# Note that only the first value of any range is given, this may be changed
if required
# Don't forget to uncomment the activate (ACT Y) when happy

(CONFIGURE USR3070/4155873961 (LD 0

# Multiple choice time, choose one only !

# Start dependent functions: priority preferred
#   Fixed IO base address 0x02f8
# Number of IO addresses required: 8
# (IO 0 (BASE 0x02f8))
#   IRQ 3.
# High true, edge sensitive interrupt (by default)
# (INT 0 (IRQ 3 (MODE +E)))

# End dependent functions
 (ACT Y)
))
# End tag... Checksum 0x00 (OK)

# Returns all cards to the "Wait for Key" state
(WAITFORKEY)




any advice would be greatthanks!
-tom




--

From: Vincent Zweije [EMAIL 

Linux-Networking Digest #732

1999-01-01 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #732, Volume #9   Fri, 1 Jan 99 14:13:35 EST

Contents:
  Re: "EZ Card" PCI driver? (mike dombrowski)
  Re: Drivers for D-Link 10/100 cards (a)
  Can't ping from Windows 98 box (sheikh rizan)
  Re: IP alias (James Knott)
  Re: Linux in NT LAN ("Bernd G. Scheu")
  Can't ping from windows 98 box (sheikh rizan)
  Re: pppd  Defender Authentication - Help (Remigiusz Samborski)
  Where is the Console Driver Menu in Kernel 2.1.99? ("George Thia")
  Re: No ethernet on RH 5.2 -- SIOCSIFLAGS?? ("WCW")
  PPP connection as  a regular user ("MC Ginting")
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Douglas E. Mitton)
  Help: samba printing to WINNT ("Kuo-Huei Lee")
  Can't ping from Win 98 box (sheikh rizan)
  Re: How do you do multiple ISPs through PPP. (Jim M)
  PID problem with dial up (jack wallen)
  Samba  os/2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PID problem with dial up (Clifford Kite)
  Re: SMBMOUNT complaining about mount ver. 6 (Jarek Luberek)
  Re: root login in telnet ("mct1")
  Re: NETGEAR (tulip driver) problem (GenaBlu)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike dombrowski)
Subject: Re: "EZ Card" PCI driver?
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 14:21:47 GMT

On Fri, 01 Jan 1999 03:09:12 +0100, Mike Van Snellenberg
mikevs@*nospam*ibm.net wrote:

After spending the last two days sifting through the HOWTO, FAQ's etc.
and not finding what I needed, I thought I'd pose the question here. 

Has anyone has ever used an SMC NIC named "EZ Card 10/100" with linux?

This is my first time setting up an ethernet interface with linux, so
I'm not entirely sure if I'm on the right path here. There doesn't
appear to be any specific driver module for my card -- there are other
SMC drivers with the snappy "EZ" name in them, but they are ISA/16bit
and not what I need. So I thought that maybe it was a generic chip which
SMC repackaged (ie DEC/Tulip), but I'm not sure how to tell if linux can
see the card. Is there a quick procedure to test if a given driver can
talk to your card?

Thx,
Mike.

Me too! I have a computer with this card in it and was wondrun how to
get it working

Mike Dombrowski

--

From: a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Drivers for D-Link 10/100 cards
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 03:58:12 -0800

http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/test/via-rhine.c

John Darrington wrote:

 Hi everyone.
 I have just bought pair of D-Link DFE-530TX 10/100 Adaptor cards.
 I thought that D-Link would be ok, as there are several drivers
 for their other cards in the kernel distribution.  But I tried all
 of those, and none can detect my card.  Then I tried compiling a
 kernel with all the PCI ethernet drivers, and letting them probe
 for it.  But no luck.

 I have tried sending a msg to D-Links's `Free Lifetime
 customer support', but so far no reply.
 The two biggest chips on the board are labeled DL10030 and DM9101
 respectivly.

 Where can I find a driver which will work with these cards?


--

From: sheikh rizan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't ping from Windows 98 box
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 21:51:11 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have set up a small LAN at home. I used an UTP cable with rj45
connectors connected to an * port hub (10baseT). One box is running
Linux Redhat 5.1 and another Windows 98. My problem is:

I can't ping the Linux box from the Windows 98 box but i can ping from
my Linux box to my Windows 98 box.

Does anyone know whats the problem?Oh yeah, when i try to run
winipcfg on my Windows 98 box it says can't read IP headers error.

Do u think it's got something to do with my UTP cabling cause I did the
cabling myself or is it just some misconfiguration on the Windows 98
box.

Lastly, the ironic thing is that, I have managed to get samba working.
Therefore, windows 98 box can access Linux partition. what's going on
here?


Please help. Thanks




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Knott)
Subject: Re: IP alias
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:33:17 -0500
Reply-To: James Knott [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to have a network interface respond
to more than 1 IP address.  I am working  thru the
Apache book.  They use BSD ifconfig which allows
IP aliases.  Can this be done in Linux.  I am using
Slackware 3.3 (3.6 is sitting here waiting for me
to do the backups and installation).

Yes it can, though I don't recall the exact proceedure.


-- 
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.

--

From: "Bernd G. Scheu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux in NT LAN
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 15:23:41 +0100

Basically you can use Samba as a BDC on your NT-site. It can route all logon
requests to a NT-PDC as you specify it in the 

Linux-Networking Digest #733

1999-01-01 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #733, Volume #9   Fri, 1 Jan 99 17:13:40 EST

Contents:
  linux server behind a router ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux in NT LAN ("arix")
  Re: ml.org botched MX records: who to talk to? ("Charles Stack")
  linux users ("Aaron Thomason")
  Newbie question: Internet on my laptop using a school Windows NT network (Michel 
Taal)
  Demon Internet dial-up won't work (NL) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: NetGear config problem (Dale Miracle)
  Re: NetGear config problem (Dale Miracle)
  Secure Card patch (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Can't find rc.inet1, rc.inet2 in REDHAT?? (lamakie)
  Re: RedHat 5.2  3c574 pcmcia network card (Peter Greenwood)
  having trouble w/ network code (Joe Smith)
  Re: NetGear config problem (Dale Miracle)
  Re: NetGear config problem (Dale Miracle)
  Port Forwarding (Danz)
  Re: PPP connection as  a regular user (Scott Gregg)
  Proxy Server behind a firewall (Matthias Braun)
  Rip-noise on PPP-connection. ("Kees Bouman")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux server behind a router
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 18:45:33 GMT

I'm a newbie to Linux as well as to Networking.
Currently I'm trying to setup a linux server.
I've got a small intranet with ip's in the range 192.168.100.n.
the linux server has the ip 192.168.100.200.
then there is a router connected to the isp via leased line.
it has the ip 192.168.100.100. and does network adress translation.
i've configured it so that all incoming requests are redirected to the
server.

from another computer connected to the internet I can
telnet, smtp, http, ftp the server.

yet now that i want to setup a samba server i've discovered some weird things.
the server does not answer to ping requests, wether from outside nor from the
server itself.
i can't telnet from the server to the server.
when doing a telnet localhost I end up with a connection to the router.

I guess something is really wrong with my configuration.
Maybe someone could point me to some possible errors that I made.

thank you very much.

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: "arix" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux in NT LAN
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 01:50:53 +0800
Reply-To: "arix" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank your help. But we can't add Samba as BDC in our site. In fact, we
don't want to make change to the server, and what I want to do is access the
NT volume so I can R/W to it, and access the Internet though MS Proxy
Server. Is there any suggestion?
Arisu Chan

Bernd G. Scheu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:76iptu$56c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...




--

From: "Charles Stack" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ml.org botched MX records: who to talk to?
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 12:22:59 -0500

I thought ml.org went defunct last month...




--

From: "Aaron Thomason" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux users
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 13:11:56 -0600

I am trying to learn about linux networking, and I was wondering if someone
can tell me where to find a file that contains a list of the users and
account information about the people that have accounts on my linux box.  I
am running the latest distribution of slackware.

thanx
athom










--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michel Taal)
Subject: Newbie question: Internet on my laptop using a school Windows NT network
Date: 1 Jan 1999 13:06:15 -0600

I have a laptop with Red Hat 5.2. On school we have a Windows NT
network and can use internet. I can connect my laptop to the
schoolnetwork using my pcmcia ethernetcard.

How can I setup Red Hat 5.2 so I can also use Internet on my laptop?

TIA

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Demon Internet dial-up won't work (NL)
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 17:01:35 GMT

Hi,

I got my pppsetup to dial Demon Internet, but when I try to http://
anything outside the www.demon.nl network, I get an endless wait...
I can ping, ftp, traceroute, etc everyone, just http won't work...

Can anyone please help me ?

Martijn ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

--

From: Dale Miracle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NetGear config problem
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 15:37:26 -0500

Troutman wrote:
 Some people have had lots of luck with the fa310tx card (if thats what
 you are using).
 
 I have the d1 chipset and still cant get it to work under rh 5.2.

I have the D1 in my machines, the older kernels I used the (before
2.0.36) tulip.c from the driver disk (or downloaded from netgear's web
site, netgear.baynetworks.com).  I just re-installed slackware one of my
other machines that was using 2.0.29 and it now using 2.0.36.  It
appears that the tulip.c in 2.0.36 version of the kernel works because I
didn't have to use the  one from the driver disk.

-- 
Dale Miracle

Linux-Networking Digest #734

1999-01-01 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #734, Volume #9   Fri, 1 Jan 99 20:13:28 EST

Contents:
  Re: linux users (Rob Clark)
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Howard Mann)
  Re: setting up a gateay for a cable modem (Stephen Carville)
  One  Way Cable Modem Setup ("William Borland")
  Re: ppp daemon died unexpectedly (Jim Holehouse)
  Re: Netgear RT328 Config? No Support from Bay Networks! (Dale Miracle)
  Re: Linux Autoexec.bat (Paul Black)
  is it always necessary to bind() before connect()? (dunno)
  Re: fetchmail problems... (Nicholas Barry)
  Q: ISDN Card Telesafe UTM under Linux? ("Thale Wester")
  Re: US WEST Megabit service? (Djief)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HELP !!! (Elmo Recio)
  Help with diald (Scott Gregg)
  Re: USR 56K PnP problems in RH 5.2, slow port? (Paul B. Brown)
  Re: RC.INET (Carl Spalletta)
  Re: Input/output error(5) (Carl Spalletta)
  Re: need paging software for linux (Carl Spalletta)
  Updated Netscape and ncftp from RedHat, but still having some problems ("Mitchell 
Maltenfort")
  Re: setting up a gateay for a cable modem (Paul B. Brown)
  Re: DHCPD reports Network not reachable (Sam Redding)
  Linux box behind proxy server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: IP Bridging (Carl Spalletta)



Subject: Re: linux users
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 19:24:05 GMT

In article 76j6a0$pnk$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Aaron Thomason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to learn about linux networking, and I was wondering if someone
can tell me where to find a file that contains a list of the users and
account information about the people that have accounts on my linux box.  I
am running the latest distribution of slackware.

/etc/passwd

This file no longer stores encrypted passwords, but it has all of the
other information, such as shell, home directory, etc.

Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html


--

From: Howard Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 1 Jan 1999 19:27:52 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton) writes:
 I'm really sorry you feel that way ... how do you deal with SPAM?
 
 {Besides the later report that your FROM line doesn't work!  :-)  }

Oops! I've corrected this -  I hope.

My E-mail address was in my signature though:-)

Actually, I do not mind the single "NOSPAM" included in an otherwise
correct  E-mail address.

 
 From a personal experience the spam became very over-powering.  

(edit)

Perhaps I've been lucky. I get 1/2 per week.
 
 Just one other point ... isn't it considered "anti-usenet" to reply by
 email instead of posting to the group ... to assist others following
 the thread?

I agree with this sentiment in general. I was primarily referring to
the " asked-a- thousand-times-before-question."

I quote from " A Primer on How to Work with the Usenet Community "
by Chuq Von Rospach, which, I believe, is posted by many ISP's on
their websites :

" One of the biggest problems we have on the network is that when someone
asks a question, many people send out identical answers...Mail your answer
to the person and suggest that they summarize to the network..."

Cheers,

-- 
Howard Mann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xmission.com/~howardm
(a LINUX website for newbies)

--

From: Stephen Carville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: setting up a gateay for a cable modem
Date: 1 Jan 1999 18:00:07 GMT

Braad Bros wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 i'm trying to set up a gateway with RH 5.2//Intel so i can share my cable
 modem.
 i have a static ip address for my internet connection... and i want to
 connect 5 windoze (microslave w98) computers to it...
 
 my linux comp has two network cards... 3com 3c900-tpo
 and all my windoze comps has 1 network card... same 3com's
 i can connect to the internet with it, but i cant share the connection.
 
 what do i need to make it work?

See:

http://www.linuxhq.com/HOWTO/mini/IP-Masquerade.html

The RH 5.2 kernelis compiled properly for ip-masq so you wont have to
recompile the kernel.

-- 
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Management: The art of hiring intelligent, skilled individuals and then
ignoring their advice.

--

From: "William Borland" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: One  Way Cable Modem Setup
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 17:28:40 -0500

I need some help setting up a One Way Cable Modem with Redhat 5.2.   I have
and generic 28.8 internal modem that is the outgoing data and a COM21 cable
modem for the incoming data connected via a hub to the server computer.
This works fine with WIN95/98.  With Linux running I can PPP via the 28.8
just fine and the eth network works just 

Linux-Networking Digest #738

1999-01-02 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #738, Volume #9   Sat, 2 Jan 99 02:13:50 EST

Contents:
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Randal)
  Re: Cable Modem - Watch Out! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: netscape and Linux? (Paul Miller)
  Linksys Ethernet (L. Patrick Allmond)
  Re: Win95 TCP/IP, Netbios and Samba (JoeBlow)
  Re: pppd Hangs up when calling IBM.net (Thomas Thyberg)
  statistics on ip/aliased interfaces? ("Greg Fausak")
  Re: FTP server - my stupidity? (James Bliss)
  @home Cable modem ("MBSHartford")
  Re: NAT MASQ overhead (Megavolt)
  Re: @home Cable modem (Mike Frisch)
  pppd routing-vs-proxyarp conflict? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Beginner help-How do I dial up network in LINUX??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Guestgroup's in /etc/ftpaccess (Neil Chambers)
  Re: PPP/modem/minicom/not responding ("Dana J. Laude")
  free RA Player and dynamic IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  IP router/masq? ("Phillip Mather")
  Help with cable modem ("R Tavender")
  Minimal BOOT installation for ethernetcard. (Juergen Berger)
  SLAPD (Ralph Mazza)
  Setting up a proxy server to distribute a cable modem signal 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  RSHD authentification (Mr. Pan Lit Wong)
  Re: SMC EtherEZ 8416 driver anyone? (Eric Jorgensen)
  Re: Minimal BOOT installation for ethernetcard. (Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk)
  Re: Dynamic IP and stale sockets (J Scott Berg)
  Re: SMC EtherEZ 8416 (Eric Jorgensen)



From: Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 22:00:05 -0800

I have my news program set to both email and post to group. I figure that the
person may not check back to the group quickly and I assume that whn a question
is asked, the person asking wants an answer. Sometimes desparately.

I used to use nospam at the front of my return address, then just decided that
I know how to use a delete button. grin

Randy

On Fri, 01 Jan 1999, David Steuber wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] () writes:

- (edit)
-  
-  Don't email to people who munge addresses. (edit)
- 
- I endorse this sentiment. I frequently reply to questions by
- E-mail only to subsequently receive an " undeliverable " message,
- even though I try to decipher a "proper" E-mail address.

My feeling is that when a question is asked in a news group, it should 
be answered in a news qroup.  With DejaNews being available, it should 
not be an excuse, "I don't get to read this group often."  Or
whatever.  Those people who do bother to follow the groups for
answeres, or use DejaNews can then possible benifit from the answere
without having to post the same or similar question again.

So, what is the spam situation now?  I have been fairly active in
several news groups, and my trashcan is not receiving much spam.  I
don't think I've seen any for a few weeks.  Could the ISPs be finaly
cracking down?

-- 
David Steuber
http://www.david-steuber.com
s/trashcan/david/ to reply by mail

"Hackers penetrate and ravage delicate, private, and publicly owned
computer systems, infecting them with viruses and stealing materials
for their own ends.  These people, they're, they're  terrorists."

-- Secret Service Agent Richard Gill

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cable Modem - Watch Out!
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 05:55:39 GMT

Check my FAq page (www.cablemodemhelp.com). It includes a little security
seciton and a portscan page that you may use to check your machine for
services (www.cablemodemhelp.com/portscan.htm).

BTW: cable operators absolutly hate sendmail (and other mail servers) because
of relay problems. Low traffic web servers (private use) are usually ok. Some
operators just would like you to tell them about it.

Johannes.

In article IDOi2.7653$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  "mct1" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This is some particularly interesting poop, and might be good to know (if
 it,s true).
 Cable Modem suscribers who run on Linux, or any other operation system
 running services should be careful (those suscribers who are issued a static
 IP addres(s)).

 For a regular home account, most, if not all CMP's prohibit the use of a
 proxy server, and file/www services. (Including IP_masquerading).

 Word is, some of these CMP's are hitting these IP's, looking for services,
 i.e. , web servers, and FTP, and on a regular basis.

 Those of "us" using masquerading might want to do a little house cleaning
 before going on line.

 Security of your system is another concern, but if anyone has information on
 this, please post.
 Thanks!!




--
--- Cable Modem FAQ: http://www.cablemodemhelp.com ---

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: Paul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: netscape and Linux?
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:35:11 GMT

"Brett Ladd." wrote:
 
 Howdy all,
 I've 

Linux-Networking Digest #746

1999-01-02 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #746, Volume #9   Sat, 2 Jan 99 03:14:17 EST

Contents:
  3c574 and Omnibook laptop problem (Neal Todd)
  Re: 2.0.36 3c509b ethernet card disappearance. Fixes? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Web Browser (Lawrence Ho)
  Re: routing to marry nets with a ppp (Larry Rivera)
  Re: Floppy Auto Mount! (Roland Friedwagner)
  Re: Diald (and named) problems... ("Richard B. McDonald")
  NFS problem with static ugid-mapping (Krisztian "The NightHacker" Litkey)
  ipfwadm (ftp port problem) (Simon Andre Simonsen)
  Re: Dropped RX Packets on Interface ppp0 (Jeff Taylor)
  Re: PPP connections dropped with _some_ Netcom dialups (allan)
  Re: NT 4 and network problems - contd ("Thing")
  Re: i386 machine as dailout/firewall (Allen O'Neill)
  Re: Network not reachable (CyberX)
  Re: Port Forwarding (Paul B. Brown)
  Re: DNS Startup time. (Alex Kamantauskas)
  Re: dual PII hang recover methods? (Mike Ireton)
  Re: pppd Hangs up when calling IBM.net (Eric Jorgensen)
  Re: Newbie, trying to build a web server (Eric Jorgensen)



From: Neal Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3c574 and Omnibook laptop problem
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:39:38 GMT

Hello,

I set up a HP Omnibook with RedHat linux 5.2 for a collegue at work
(which is working fine) and now he's bought a 3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556
Ethernet/Modem (3c574 in driver terms), however I'm having problems
gettting to work (it works fine under windows which is a bitter pill to
swallow).

I got the latest version of pcmcia card manager (3.0.6) and it does note
that the 3c574 just doesn't respond in some cases, but I'd like your
advice as to whether this is the case here or whether I've missed
something out (this is the first time I've done a linux system with
pcmcia).

The card manager build went okay and I set up the network configuration
in the same way as I've always done except for /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia
where PCMCIA=yes this time. The messages at boot time seem to suggest
that the card is being detected and the correct driver loaded (the
/etc/log/messages text is included at the end of this post). However I
don't know what to make of the other messages (eg, cs: warning: no high
memory space available!)

Does anyone have any ideas of what is going on here, the messages are
far too cryptic for me? If you need any more info or listings of config
files, please let me know and I'll post them. If you're posting to the
news group please email me also.

Many thanks, Neal.

(/etc/log/messages is below (the machine named zeus near the end is a
nis server))
(the time stamp and hostname prefixes have been stripped off for
clarity)
__


Neal Todd.
Astrophysics Group. Blackett Laboratory. Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imperial College of Science, Technology  Medicine.   Fax: +44 (0)171
594-7541
London. SW7 2BZ. U.K.
Tel: +44 (0)171 594-7532
__

syslogd 1.3-3: restart.
kernel: klogd 1.3-3, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
kernel: Cannot find map file.
kernel: No module symbols loaded.
kernel: Console: 16 point font, 400 scans
kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80x25, 1 virtual console (max 63)
kernel: pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory structure at 0x000f6560
kernel: pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory entry at 0xfd7a0
kernel: pcibios_init : PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd9db
kernel: Probing PCI hardware.
kernel: PCI: 00:20 [104c/ac17/060700] has unknown header type 82,
ignoring.
kernel: PCI: 00:21 [104c/ac17/060700] has unknown header type 82,
ignoring.
kernel: Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 297.37 BogoMIPS
kernel: Memory: 126788k/130048k available (732k kernel code, 384k
reserved, 2144k data)
kernel: Swansea University Computer Society NET3.035 for Linux 2.0
kernel: NET3: Unix domain sockets 0.13 for Linux NET3.035.
kernel: Swansea University Computer Society TCP/IP for NET3.034
kernel: IP Protocols: IGMP, ICMP, UDP, TCP
kernel: VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_5.6.0 initialized
kernel:
kernel: Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu using exception 16 error
reporting.
kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... Ok.
kernel: Linux version 2.0.34 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
2.7.2.3) #1 Fri May 8 16:05:57 EDT 1998
kernel: Starting kswapd v 1.4.2.2
kernel: Serial driver version 4.13 with no serial options enabled
kernel: tty00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
kernel: PS/2 auxiliary pointing device detected -- driver installed.
kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.07
kernel: Ramdisk driver initialized : 16 ramdisks of 4096K size
kernel: ide: i82371 PIIX (Triton) on PCI bus 0 function 57
kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfcf0-0xfcf7
kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfcf8-0xfcff
kernel: hda: TOSHIBA MK6409MAV, 6194MB w/0kB Cache, CHS=839/240/63, UDMA

kernel: hdc: TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-1702BC, ATAPI CDROM drive
kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 

Linux-Networking Digest #748

1999-01-02 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #748, Volume #9   Sat, 2 Jan 99 03:14:17 EST

Contents:
  mars_nwe non-security ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Fax Server under Linux? (Ulrich Eckhardt)
  Re: Dialing in - How-to's ("Thomas Horan")
  Modem choice for Linux (David Shepherd)
  Re: LI on reboot (Blaine Lupulack)
  Re: ODBC ("John Kos")
  Booting from LanWorks BootWare prom - `patch-bootprom' ? (Wolfgang Suttrop E1)
  Re: Restrict login by remote host (somebody)
  Re: linux "router" (Earl Robinson)
  TCP wrappers busted my NFS!?!?!? ("David J. Topper")
  Re: /dev/modem Serial Port PPP? (Green Manalishi)
  FTP server - my stupidity? (James Bliss)
  Re: FTP server - my stupidity? (Ashok Aiyar)
  Re: Help with cable modem (Chad Cunningham)
  IP Forwarding not working! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Trying to fix a dual identify ("Mitchell Maltenfort")
  Re: Easy UNIX editor ("James A. Cleland")
  Re: 5.1 FTP PORTS HELP (Bernard Kenik)
  suche Info zu cipe, pptp, ip-tunneling, vpn ("BFunk")
  Re: email problem. (Andrzej Filip)
  Re: Win95 TCP/IP, Netbios and Samba ("Bart Verspagen")
  Test, please ignore (Cory Casciato)
  Re: how to determine the number of users on a linux system (Stephen Bodnar)
  Re: Newbie question: installing 3com ethernet cards ("Thing")
  Re: pppd Hangs up when calling IBM.net (Thomas Thyberg)
  Re: 2 IP address for 1 ethernet card ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Windows 98 machine can't logon to Linux Server (Mark Worsdall)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mars_nwe non-security
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:45:35 GMT

mars_nwe 0.99.pl13
RH Linux 5.1/2.0.35

It's really a shame, I've come this far in getting mars_nwe to work, only to
learn that it doesn't provide any security (that I noticed anyway). Or
perhaps it does, but I've yet to find any detailed reference to it. I've
tried using SYSCON from a workstation - it SEEMS to work. It lets me set
user's trustee rights in a given directory, or make them part of a group with
such rights. I have the -t flag on the volumes in question. Then I log in as
that user and I get the most unpredictable behavior. Some times it lets them
see files and directories belonging (as SYSCON sees it) to other users, even
created by other users. I don't mean just file scan rights, but full
read/write access. I've tried setting various default create permissions for
each volume, presently using 711 for directories and 600 for files. I've
tried both a root and non- root supervisor. Deleted the bindery and trustee
directories. With groups and without. I haven't even tried security
equivilances, so that's not the problem.

Still, Any user can often see other user's files, read, write, create and
delete them. On more than one occassion, the same user COULD NOT see their
own files! The only reason I need mars_nwe is because the the UGO rights that
Linux provides don't allow me to place a person into more than one group (at
a time) or allow rights to a file by more than one group.

I'm thinking it's time to ditch this program and take a closer look at Samba.
It's more of a pain to do that way, but at least it works. I'd really like to
see this mars_nwe work, but I need some details, and perhaps an explanation
of how this happened so I can avoid security problems in the future. I've
searched USENET and WWW, but I guess I'm using the wrong query, because
nothing useful turns up.

Help?

FF

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Fax Server under Linux?
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:47:03 GMT

andy wrote:
 
 I am looking into setting up a fax server under for a small network. In
 this regard someone placed a message in this newsgroup stating:-
 
  To cut right to the chase, the combination of whfc and hylafax does
  *exactly* what you want.
 
 I have heard of hylafax but what is 'WHFC'?
 
 Any help greatly appreciated.

Hi,

whfc is a Windows client for HylaFAX. 
See http://www.transcom.de/whfc for more informations.

Uli
-- 
Ulrich Eckhardt Tr@nscom GbR 
http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/uli  http://www.transcom.de
Lagerstraße 11-15 A8
64807 Dieburg Germany

--

From: "Thomas Horan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dialing in - How-to's
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:47:08 GMT

and Serial-HOWTO



I don't think Dial_in-HOWTO exists. PPP-HOWTO has some hints for this
topic, too. Anyhow, I've described mine such a server in WWW. You can find
that description if you follow the link "My links for Linux PPP" on my
homepage. Ask for more if you like.




--

From: David Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux-Networking Digest #749

1999-01-02 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #749, Volume #9   Sat, 2 Jan 99 05:13:51 EST

Contents:
  Re: FA310TX with linuxmaking it work (Larry Mintz)
  Re: After IP Masquerade done ?? ("Robert C. Paulsen, Jr.")
  Re: ipfwadm (ftp port problem) (Eric Jorgensen)
  Shell Scrip for Telnet (Chan Tin Lok)
  Re: corrupted Netware disk (Scott Hessel)
  Weird netcard error ("Samuel Liddicott (WWH)")
  Re: Minimal BOOT installation for ethernetcard. (William Burrow)
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (David Steuber)
  Re: Newbie question: Internet on my laptop using a school Windows NT network (David 
Steuber)
  need help with shell script ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: fetchmail problems... (David Steuber)
  Re: Linksys Ethernet (James Bliss)
  graphical login screen?? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: @home Cable modem ("KJT")
  Re: Help with cable modem ("A.L.Grendel")
  NE2000 PnP card problem ("John Winnard")
  Help with c-masqdialer-server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: RedHat ppp/PAP woes ("Christian Tagtachian")
  High Level Network Engineer!!! Immediate Need ("icesjobs")
  Re: How to build a Linux cluster? ("KJT")
  Re: DLink DFE-530TX and Linux (Kelvin Leung)
  Re: 3com netelligent 10/100 tx embedded (Kazin)
  IP Forwarding corrupts FTP uploads an downloads (Steven P Poulsen)
  Re: Compaq 10 and 10/100 (Eric Jorgensen)
  Problem with in.pop3d; mail reduplicates! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Mintz)
Subject: Re: FA310TX with linuxmaking it work
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:50:50 GMT

John Meissen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

: make dep clean modules modules_install %zlilo

: Now he rebuilds and installs the modules? Unless by '%zlilo' he means
: either 'zImage' or 'vmlinuz'

Now, this is something that I can comment on.  The README file that comes
with the 2.0.x Linux kernels suggests using 'make zlilo' instead, since that
will build the compressed image *and* run lilo to update the boot links.
There is, as far as I know, no '%' needed.  I have used 'make zlilo' to build
kernels from 2.0.0 to 2.0.36, so I know that it works.  I was unaware, however,
that you could inovke multiple targets in one make call, so I have always
done the make calls separately for each of the targets I needed to run.

Larry

--

From: "Robert C. Paulsen, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: After IP Masquerade done ??
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:50:48 GMT

Joekie wrote:
 
 I have configured IP Masquerade on my Linux box and it work fine with my
 other Win95 Machine on LAN.
 
 By the way, It is posible to do this :-
 
 Can anyone tell me how to configure so that the modem dial when the client
 from Win95 get access to the Internet and the line drop if nobody get access
 to the Internet ???
 
 Thanks in advance 
 
 Joekie Thong

Look for diald.

-- 
Robert Paulsen http://paulsen.home.texas.net
If my return address contains "ZAP." please remove it. Sorry for the
inconvenience but the unsolicited email is getting out of control.

--

From: Eric Jorgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfwadm (ftp port problem)
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:50:52 GMT

"su"
"modprobe ip_masq_ftp"

 - Eric


Simon Andre Simonsen wrote:
 
 I have a problem connecting to some ftp hosts, with IP masqurade. I have
 
 loaded the ip_masq_ftp.o with kernel 2.2.34. I think it is the port.
 This server here have port 23 and not 21.
 Here is what the message locks like.
 
 530 Only client IP address allowed for PORT command.
 ! port cmd failed.
 ! DoDirList failed 0
 QUIT
 
 Hope someone have an answer to this one.Feel fre to E-Mail me.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chan Tin Lok)
Subject: Shell Scrip for Telnet
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:51:01 GMT

Does anybody know how to write a shell script to automatically telnet to a system and 
enter the username and password?

--

From: Scott Hessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: corrupted Netware disk
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 06:51:06 GMT

Pieter Dumon wrote:

 Yesterday we had a harddisk crash on our Netware 3.12 system.
 It's, off course the disk with the data we needed for today.
 We tried to mount the disk in a Linux system. Allthough Linux
 supports the Netware file system, it doesn't want to mount it,
 the well-known masterblock error.
 Does anyone know of utilities to read  repair that disk under Linux?
 We could also try to run a Netware server on Linux (Samba), and then
 access it through ncp. Is there anyone with experience in the field?

 Pieter Dumon

 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  http://studwww.rug.ac.be/~pdumon

  ICQ  : 12428974
 ---

While not a Linux-style answer

If your drive is not spinning at all (listen closely when you turn on
the server), then try giving the HDD a whack with a screwdriver to free
up the R/W head.   

Linux-Networking Digest #774

1999-01-04 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #774, Volume #9   Mon, 4 Jan 99 08:13:38 EST

Contents:
  Connecting via M$ Proxy Server/Firewall (Jaco =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?=)
  eth0: Too much work at interrupt ("Björn Dolkemeier")
  Error # 11 ("Yura Tokarsky")
  smbmount 2.0.0beta5 and linux 2.2.0pre4 ("John M. Flinchbaugh")
  Re: Clear Netscape Cache (Andre Bossard)
  Routing-problems with ZyXEL Omni TA 128 and PPP-2.3.X (Kolbjorn Bekkelund)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO  HEELP !!! 
("Crossbones")
  Help with PPP to ISP via pppd (Michael Dobbins)
  Re: Error # 11 ("Thomas Bendler")
  Re: PPP (SImon Gibson)
  Re: SAMBA... ("Thomas Bendler")
  Re: What do I need for a network? ("Thomas Bendler")
  routing has me stumped ("Neil Robinson")
  Re: Sendmail Virus Scanning (Maurie Daly)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO  HEELP !!! (DG)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have  (Richard Stevens)
  Re: browsing a samba share in security=user (George Shaunfield)



From: Jaco =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kr=FCger?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Connecting via M$ Proxy Server/Firewall
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 12:57:02 +0200

Our company switched to an NT machine to serve as a gateway to the
internet.
I can communicate perfectly inside our internal network, as well as on
the external (when I'm wired up outside the gateway), but I cannot get
through the Micro$oft gateway...

I've been told that it is the MS system that refuses to let any other OS
through.. (dunno..)
Anybody know how to fool the NT system into letting my linux box speak
to the outside world?

Jaco


--

From: "Björn Dolkemeier" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: eth0: Too much work at interrupt
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 10:51:13 +0100

Hello,

syslogd reports (message and warning): eth0: Too much work at interrupt

Can someone tell me about this warning (error?)

Björn



--

From: "Yura Tokarsky" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error # 11
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 13:08:23 +0200

When I installed Linux Red HAt 5.1 entered then my login-root,
password then startx and then I'm getting the message="cannot connect to X
server-caught signal 11".Maybe smbd knows what is the
problem
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 21074368



--

From: "John M. Flinchbaugh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smbmount 2.0.0beta5 and linux 2.2.0pre4
Date: 4 Jan 1999 09:15:48 GMT



-- 
}John Flinchbaugh{__
| - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.hjsoft.com/~glynis/ |
~~Powered by Linux: Reboots are for hardware upgrades only~~

--

From: Andre Bossard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Clear Netscape Cache
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 10:36:46 +

 Edit - Preferences - Advanced - Cache - Clear Disk Cache
 
 in NS 4.07 but it does not do the job.  Why?  Can I do it manually?  How?
Hyo Arthur
You probably know that there are profiles for every user. The default
user is _default (i think). Search your user folder of netscape users
and change to the directory of the user (default: _default). In this
folder you will see a folder called 'cache' delete its content.
But there is also a history-file (Enter in Adress-field: about:global).
To delete this, simply delete the netscape.hst file in the netscape
directory.

--

From: Kolbjorn Bekkelund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Routing-problems with ZyXEL Omni TA 128 and PPP-2.3.X
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 22:57:50 +
Reply-To: Kolbjorn Bekkelund [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am using a ZyXEL Omni TA128 for my ISDN ppp-dialup connection.
I do not have any ethernet cards or other local network interf.

I use it along with my Red Hat 5.2 powered Compaq Armada 1592, and with
ppp-2.2.0f. Yes, 2.2.0f, because anything newer, let`s say 2.3.5, let me
dial up OK,
get me logged in and assinged to an IP-adr.,  but then things starts to
go the wrong way:

I can not ping anything else than my dynam. assigned IP-adr. and my own
localhost.
Any pings to the outside world, including my ISP`s DNS leads to 100%
packet loss.

If I connect to my ISP via my analog USR Sportster 28800 with the same
setup (except for adj. in the modem init-string),
everything works just fine with ppp-2.3.x.

My routing table is OK for all the different setups. The only
significant difference to notice is that when I use "netstat -r"
it takes about a minute before it displays any results when I am using
ppp-2.3.x, but it displays promptly when ppp-2.2.0f
is used. It also resolves the remote IP-adr. and displays the name in
the 

Linux-Networking Digest #780

1999-01-05 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #780, Volume #9   Tue, 5 Jan 99 00:13:33 EST

Contents:
  getting linux to show up in 'Network Neighborhood' (Mark Fearer)
  Re: Adding local terminal on cua3 long) (Doug DeJulio)
  Looking for a cool HPC, how about this ??? (Ken)
  Re: 2 Netze über das Intenet verbinden (Peter Steiert)
  ftp/tcp problem (lweiss)
  Re: Network Card Sustained Data Transfer Rate? (James Youngman)
  Re: @home cable setup (Someone Alive)
  Re: more 3c905b problems (steve)
  Re: resume downloading software (Leon Wood)
  Re: USR 56k modem + RH Linux 5.2 (Paul B. Brown)
  Re: ppp over telnet or rlogin (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: USR 56K PnP problems in RH 5.2, slow port? (John Mock)
  Re: ppp-on connects, but no routing (Clifford Kite)
  Re: NIC (NE2000) not configured on new system ("Kevin D. Timm")
  Newbie: network (Linux-W95) problem. (jmp)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Fearer)
Subject: getting linux to show up in 'Network Neighborhood'
Date: 4 Jan 1999 22:09:38 GMT

 Hi. Have a network dominated by that 'other' operating system. How can I
get a linux box to show up in the 'Network Neighborhood' of Windows 95 
Windows NT? I have a Pentium on the network running the 2.0.27 kernel of
Redhat. The SMB package was loaded by default on this machine. Do I have
to do something with samba? /etc/exports?
 Thanks in advance

--
==
Mark Fearer*   C:\DOS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *   C:\DOS\RUN
http://www.fearernet.com/mfearer   *   RUN\DOS\RUN

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug DeJulio)
Subject: Re: Adding local terminal on cua3 long)
Date: 4 Jan 1999 15:54:15 -0500

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
R. B. Howes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have an old Heath VT52 compatible dumb terminal that I want to set up 
as a local terminal through the COM4 (sorry - /dev/cua3) serial port on 
the PC.

Wow, I remember hooking up VT52s to our old network of Sun2s when my
roommates and I started setting up our first home Unix network, ten
years ago.  You've got to love a terminal that you can hide a six-pack
inside, and have the system still work.

By the way, use /dev/ttyS3 -- even folks who don't consider the cua*
devices to be evil admit that they're just for callout.  A terminal is
more like a modem.  The getty should use /dev/ttyS3.

 I've found a lot of info on setting up a serial port and modem 
for remote dial-in, but not as much with a simple direct connection. I 
know I need to use getty to do this, but do I need to edit my inittab 
file to set this up at boot time, or can I do this after Linux has come 
up?

You can get init to re-read the init file by entering "kill -1 1" as
root.  So, you don't have to reboot.  This is good for tinkering.

That VT52 mention has gotten me thinking -- it should be possible to
get a really small x86 box and hide it in the VT52's "six-pack
compartment".  Re-route the serial cable, set the x86 box up to use
Linux with a serial console, and you'll have a strange, standalone
VT52 that runs Linux.  I'll have to go dig one out of storage somewhere...
-- 
Doug DeJulio  | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HKS, Incorporated | http://www.hks.net/~ddj/

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken)
Subject: Looking for a cool HPC, how about this ???
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 03:02:22 GMT

Looking for a cool HPC, how about this ???
==

I am posting this b/c I like the Linux comm. and want everything to
know something about a piece of equipment I thought was interesting.

It's called the Dauphin DTR-1. 
The unofficail Home page is:
http://www.eskimo.com/~toby/dauphin/

This link is hopelessly outdated, but with your help I'd like to
change that.

I'll get to the point.
I can get a hold of a good number of them and know that they will run
linux. Check the URL above for some info. (There is also a version
called HAL something that may work).

I am currently planning on selling these guys on eBay where they have
been going for up to $300. in the past.

My starting price for the DTR-1 and some extras is $150, but I would
go lower if someone was interested in a small quantity.

Here;s what you'd get.
* The DTR-1 a 486SLC 25 HPC/notebook computer 4mb memory, 40mb HD,
2400 Baud fax modem, VGA out port, com port, REAL par. port - will
work with zip drives! (nicer than a palmpilot)

* Detachable mini Keyboard
* Leather Case
* Battery
* A/C adaptor
* Car D/C adaptor

For my Linux friends (I mean that sincerely)
* Extra battery ($50 value)
* External charger
* Grid Hardshell case

What's missing:

*The Active pen (I can't find out where to get them 'cheaply' so if
YOU do let me know).
*The manual

Acces:
Floppy or External HD used to come as access. very hard to get and not
very nec.
Memory upgrade from 4mb to 6mb still avail.

Linux-Networking Digest #785

1999-01-05 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #785, Volume #9   Tue, 5 Jan 99 16:14:04 EST

Contents:
  MCSE practice questions for NT exams was all found for free on 
http://home.bip.net/admonh ("YARON ADMON HEFETZ")
  3com 3c509tp problems being detected ("Daryl Hurd")
  Network scanner for Linux (Michael Tse)
  Diald problem (Nickolai Sergienko)
  Re: getting linux to show up in 'Network Neighborhood' ("andy")
  How to install SAINT for Linux  (Michael Tse)
  Re: How to upgrade my kernel ? (Jason P. Holland)
  Collisions in 100 BaseT FD ("Yann Bizeul")
  Can I flush my TCP buffers? (Bjorn)
  Re: DNS problem ("Cherokee Health Systems")
  Re: When a packet hits a pocket. (Troutman)
  cant connect to apache ("Matt Chipman")
  Re: IP Accounting (Clifford Kite)
  Re: eth0: Too much work at interrupt ("Sean Connolly")
  ghostscript  samba  win95 (Martin Tullier)
  Re: Telnet login ("Cherokee Health Systems")
  MIME ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: smbmount 2.0.0beta5 and linux 2.2.0pre4 (Chris Underhill)



From: "YARON ADMON HEFETZ" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MCSE practice questions for NT exams was all found for free on 
http://home.bip.net/admonh
Date: 5 Jan 1999 10:12:26 GMT

MCSE practice questions for NT exams was all found for free on
http://home.bip.net/admonh

NT server 4
Workstation 4
Enterprise
Essentials



--

From: "Daryl Hurd" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3com 3c509tp problems being detected
Date: 5 Jan 1999 18:18:48 GMT

I have a 3com 3c509tp card. It was detected during install and I was able
to configure the NIC. It worked fine and BootP was running with TCP/IP
protocol.

I installed a SoundBlaster Pro and the NIC stopped working. Linux will not
detect the card during bootup and ifconfig doesn't allow me to add the NIC.

Does anybody know how to re-detect a NIC like the installation does? 
Linuxconf still has the same settings as before and have not changed. I
have tried removing the sound card and re-booting but it still doesn't
work. 

I am stumped... I have tried to manually add the irq and io in linuxconf to
the card's orginal settings.




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Tse)
Subject: Network scanner for Linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:18:40 GMT

Hi:

Any network scanner for Linux  could be download from internet

I have tried saint. But it cannot work in my Linux Box.

Thank

Mike. 

--

From: Nickolai Sergienko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Diald problem
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:27:18 +0100

Hello,

I'm trying to set diald, so that it establish PPP connection to ISP when
someone in intranet need it and hang up when connection is idled.
I've a strange problem: Diald starts dialing approx. every 3 min, even
if nobody requesting URLs from Internet. From debug information I've
found out that diald accepting packets addressed to ISP DNS server.
I can't figure out what process is sending these packets! They come
from my IP number and the port number increases by 2 each time (starting
with 1050), i.e. every next packet, which caused diald to initiate the
connection come from different port. The port number already reached
1600!

I'm running SOCKS on the Linux box, can that be a problem?
Does anyone knows how to make diald to ignore these packets?

Any help will be greatly appreciated!

Nickolai




--

From: "andy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: getting linux to show up in 'Network Neighborhood'
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:28:35 GMT

You might like to consider upgrading to Version 2 of Samba. There is a Beta
V3 out now and it comes with a working version of the Samba Web admin tool,
(SWAT). This seems to make it quite easy to set up the Linux box as a
preferred master and local master browser.

Rgds
Andy

Mark Fearer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article
76re72$e0b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Hi. Have a network dominated by that 'other' operating system. How can I
 get a linux box to show up in the 'Network Neighborhood' of Windows 95 
 Windows NT? I have a Pentium on the network running the 2.0.27 kernel of
 Redhat. The SMB package was loaded by default on this machine. Do I have
 to do something with samba? /etc/exports?


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Tse)
Subject: How to install SAINT for Linux 
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 13:18:30 GMT

Hi:

During the installation of SAINT in my Linux box, after I run make
linux, the following message appear:
can't find command nmblookup
can't find  command smbclient

Then I run perl reconfig to continue the installation. perl 5.0 was
installed in my box


When I run ./saint, the following message appear:

saint shutdown

 then my box return to root

Why? what is going wrong?

How can I install SAINT?  PLEASE HELP.


THANK
MIKE 

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason P. Holland)
Subject: Re: How to upgrade my kernel ?
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 

Linux-Networking Digest #793

1999-01-06 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #793, Volume #9   Wed, 6 Jan 99 02:13:50 EST

Contents:
  VPN with Linux (Eric Preston)
  VPN with Linux (Eric Preston)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Randal)
  Re: Post handshake PPP problem. (RH 5.2) (Warren Mira)
  Re: When a packet hits a pocket. ("H. P. Friedrichs")
  Re: pppd not activating modem ("Lewis Foti")
  samba mount problem (Eric Melville)
  Linux still doesn't recognize my modem (Usman Abbasi)
  BOOTPD and Vendor Specific Tags - Help! (Douglas E. Mitton)
  Re: NT 4 and network problems ("Ghost Rider")
  Re: When a packet hits a pocket. (Troutman)
  Re: Where's RedHat rc.inet1, rc.inet2 files?? (Stuart R. Fuller)
  FYI: to anyone trying to get the second b channel to connect under linux ("Felix 
Dominguez")
  Re: Need driver for Netgear FA310TX NIC (Troutman)
  Re: Simple Network (Kevin Martin)
  3Com Megahertz 3CCFEM556BI and RedHat 5.2 - almost there (?) (tmf)
  Re: can not see smbd/nmbd daemons running (David Graham)
  Re: This ongoing flame-fest ("James E. Coleman")



From: Eric Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN with Linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:41:22 -0500


Can anyone point me in the right direction for setting up a VPN with two
linux boxes? I vaguely recall something way back when about
linux-linux encryption patches by some cypherpunk people, but don't
really remember much more than that.

thanks in advance.

--

From: Eric Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VPN with Linux
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:41:50 -0500


Can anyone point me in the right direction for setting up a VPN with two
linux boxes? I vaguely recall something way back when about
linux-linux encryption patches by some cypherpunk people, but don't
really remember much more than that.

thanks in advance.

--

From: Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Crossposted-To: 
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 21:30:46 -0800

My, how pleasent. Spend much time with street kids do you?

On Tue, 05 Jan 1999, DG wrote:
YOU AIN'T NO F** BODY TO JUDGE LIKE THAT. DON'T EVER LET ME SEE
YOU POST LIKE THAT OR I'LL KICK YOUR MF A** !!!

On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 15:49:30 -0700, Bill Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

DG wrote:
 
 Stuff a pie in your face.
 
 On Fri, 01 Jan 1999 22:44:11 -0600, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  snip
  DO NOT GIVE ME IRRELEVANT BULLSH**
  SUCH AS TELLING ME TO PARTITION MY OTHER HARD DRIVE. I WILL CONTINUE
  TO POST THIS MESSAGE UNTIL SOMEONE HELPS ME FIX THIS PROBLEM !!!
 
  Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
  past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
 

Given the nature of your posts, I would venture to say it would likely
that your acocunt was cancelled for abuse.

  
 
   using umsdos might be your ticket...
 
 i agree with doug 'n darren... the tone of your posts does tend discourage the 
help
 you're seeking...
 

--

Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 21:13:33 -0800
From: Warren Mira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Post handshake PPP problem. (RH 5.2)



Andy Pohl wrote:

 Hi.

 My modem's OK.  It dials OK.  It handshakes (like the typical handshake noise
 for 33.6) OK.  But after that, I don't know what goes on.  Usernet will stay
 yellow, it redials, and tries again.  I tested this with Minicom, and it
 would start a mode where strange characters would be sent in small clusters.

what comes firstthose strange characters or the login prompt...If the answer
is those strange characters..then your ISP is using PAP.


 I have made the chat using linuxconf like:

 Expect: ogin:
 Send:   login
 Expect: assword:
 Send:   password
 Expect: lip-server
 Send:   ppp
 Expect: TIMEOUT
 Send:   5
 Expect: ~--

 I don't know if I need to bother with PAP authentication, because I don't know
 what that is.  I can't seem to find any logs that would tell me what happened
 to the connection...

$ tail -f /var/log/messages


 what are the names of them?  If I'm leaving anything out,
 feel free to ask me anything else since I'm sure I'm not telling the whole
 story.

 Thanks.

 Andy

hopes this helps


--

From: "H. P. Friedrichs" " HPeter.Friedrichs"@alliedsignal.com
Subject: Re: When a packet hits a pocket.
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 12:58:27 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This may be relevant to you: Linux Router Project

http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/

Pete



Troutman wrote:
 
 Matt Kressel wrote:
  Firstly, the minimum TCP/IP packet size is 40 bytes (IP header + TCP
  header), so I guess you mean just the data.  At 20,000 packets per
  second 

Linux-Networking Digest #801

1999-01-07 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #801, Volume #9   Thu, 7 Jan 99 00:13:46 EST

Contents:
  Red Hat 5.2  Earthlink ("Curtis Ross")
  Re: Ip masq.again (William E. Powers)
  Re: PPTP from NT4 through RH5.1 Firewall (John Auld)
  Linux - Win95 proxy - Internet ("Andy Edgeworth")
  IP connection ("Wolfgang Grossbauer")
  Multihomed Network Timeouts ("Scott Brause")
  Re: IPX and IP on 3c905b and Caldera (AWing10651)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Loose Nut)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Loose Nut)
  linux as a throttling router ? (Geerten Kuiper)
  Email problems... Please Help! ("Brent Wilson")
  pppd error message ("Darrin")
  Re: Help!  TCP connection closed by foreign host (Woodrow Sawyer)
  Re: How to use 2 DNS servers ? (Jim Reid)
  Re: How to Determine if ifwadm is installed? (John P)
  Re: Redhat 5.2, SAMBA and Win98,   Question resolved.  Now is there a fix (The Maxxz)
  Multiple servers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Routing with 3 NIC's in one machine, Firewall (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: Caching nameserver causes delay in sending mail (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: RPC: Port mapper failure (Dale Smith)
  still having ppp problems.
  DNS: How to serve two domains ? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Hellmann)
  Re: Ipfwadm queries (Mantikor)
  RPC: Port mapper failure (Stef)
  help with mail-forwarding (Simon Christian)



From: "Curtis Ross" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Red Hat 5.2  Earthlink
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 07:31:11 -0800

Does anyone have a working script to connect to earthlink network?

Thanks
Curtis Ross




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William E. Powers)
Subject: Re: Ip masq.again
Date: 1 Jan 1999 16:11:02 GMT

In article 368c2d68.23440082@wingate,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike dombrowski) writes:
 Hello LinuxPeople!
 
 I have a linux box with two network cards in it. It's running RH4.2
 and can ping both nets(right word??) that it is connected to. I also
 have a cable modem and a win98 machine serving up proxy. The machine
 is short on disk space, 2x 116mb hard drives, and ram, 8mb, but runs X
 pretty well. If I want it to do IP masq I should read the ipmasq howto
 on the rh4.2 cd right? Do I have to recompile the kernel? I ask
 because it has no c/c++ compilers on it, they were left off to save
 space. The win box is a 350P2 with 64mb ram, would the linux box offer
 the same level of performance if it was running ip masquerding? Can IP
 masq masquerade between multiple network cards?

1)  You should easily be able to get compilers on a box with 232M of
hard drive space.

2)  You would probably appreciate another 8M, though, if you start
compiling kernels on it.

3)  No problem with multiple ethx interfaces.  I've got both a 10Base-T
and a 100Base-T net connected to my masq box.

4)  You can basically fit the whole schmeer on a single floppy if you
like.  Check out http://www.linuxrouter.org  I put together a floppy
that brings up the ISDN line and masq's all the boxes so I could at 
least have Internet if the hard drive on the masq box dies.  I can
even sub in any other box if the masq box dies. 


--

Bill Powers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"I figure God put me here and He can take me back anytime He pleases."
- Danny Dutton, age 8.


--

From: (John Auld)
Subject: Re: PPTP from NT4 through RH5.1 Firewall
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:12:57 GMT

On Tue, 5 Jan 1999 18:56:08 -0800, "Hervey Wilson"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I'm pretty new to both Linux and Unix in general, so be gentle...

I also need to establish a PPTP connection from my NT machine to my office via the RH 
server. 

It sounds like you have got a lot right, but a bit more persistance on
the self help side would have solved your problem. Do a search on
"Linux and PPTP" via www.lycos.com, which will reveal the source of
the kernel patches that you will need when you recompile your kernel
to include PPTP support. (I don't have the URL to hand so search for
yourself).

There are How-To articles on compling the kernel, which explain the
steps, but you will need C++ development tools (make, gcc etc) which
are optional packages with RedHat Linux.



Regards

John Auld

--

From: "Andy Edgeworth" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux - Win95 proxy - Internet
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 14:47:45 GMT

I am trying to achieve the above configuration using Winproxy.
I cannot make any connections except by Telnetting from the
Linux box - which works very well. If I try ftp or Lynx, they both
just hang until I CTRLC out.

The Gateway is set up properly as far as I can tell

All help gratefully recieved.

Andy E.

--

From: "Wolfgang Grossbauer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP connection
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1999 17:01:00 +0100

Hi folks,
since a few days I'm fiddling on my LINUX internet connection, but it still
does not work.
The system is a SuSE 5.3 and 

Linux-Networking Digest #804

1999-01-07 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #804, Volume #9   Thu, 7 Jan 99 08:13:41 EST

Contents:
  Re: Help!  TCP connection closed by foreign host (Wayne Parrott)
  Re: Tracing/Accounting a connection to my Linux box... ("Alan J. Wylie")
  Help: I am not a new user but when I connect to my ISP insted of login prompt I get 
all sorts of stupid symbols ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Redhat 5.2, SAMBA and Win98,   Question resolved.  Now is there a (Mark 
Cooperstein)
  Apache x SSL ("Artur Rodrigues")
  any site for CNE Pass Exam question??? ("hum")
  Re: Route Between 2 Networks With Only One Ethernet Interface? (Sam Robertson)
  How to build chat room with in Linux? (Kelvin Leung)
  Linux firewall doesn't forward anything - HELP!! ("Neil Robinson")
  Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server ("Jay Bramble")
  is someone know good GATED information bases (smaraux)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Bill Anderson)
  Re: FTP through IP masquerading (raj)
  What is a proxy ("Alain Lussier")
  Re: How to check the status of Firewall. (Hajo Simons)
  Re: SMC EtherEZ 8416 ("Eugene E. Devereaux")
  Re: leased line pppd problem (Rob van der Putten)
  How do you configure second network card: Redhat 5.2? (Phil Berry)
  Re: Get ip-up and ip-down to "echo" some information (Michael Meissner)
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (Tom Smith)



From: Wayne Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help!  TCP connection closed by foreign host
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 1999 21:06:36 +1100



mike wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm running Redhat 5.2 that has been
 working beautifully until last
 week.  Now every time I try to open
 a socket connection to my computer I
 get the usual "Connected" message,
 it thinks about it for a few seconds
 then gives the error "connection
 closed by foreign host"  I used a
 port scanner to make sure all my
 ports are running.  All daemons are
 running as well.  This happens if I
 use any TCP utility (rsh, ftp,
 telnet, rlogin) but not with UDP (my
 http server is stiill responding as
 normal).  I have no problems
 telneting out of my computer, only
 telneting in.  Even if I telnet to
 myself it doesn't work.  I have also
 tried telneting to myself using the
 localhost address.  Logging in as
 root doesn't help.  Any help would
 be much appreciated in my hour of
 desperation.
 
 Thanks
 Mike

You might have accidentaly uninstalled tcpd

--

From: "Alan J. Wylie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Tracing/Accounting a connection to my Linux box...
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 20:48:12 +

Robert Nickel wrote:
 
 I am interested in seeing the IP addresses of those who connect to my
 machine via telnet or otherwise.  I want to be able to run a sort of
 traceroute on the connections to see where they are originating.

1) have a look at TCP wrappers (man tcpd), or see 
(the new, shinier) freshmeat appindex record at:
http://news.freshmeat.net/appindex/1998/12/08/913153273.html

2) at a much lower level, there's ipchains, or the older
ipfwadm - see http://www.rustcorp.com/linux/ipchains/

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help: I am not a new user but when I connect to my ISP insted of login prompt 
I get all sorts of stupid symbols
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 09:45:01 GMT

Reply me only at:  Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
--- When I try to connect to my ISP via dial up connection It dosent connect
and I tried minicom to see what did I get.  I got connected but after that I
get some trash and studpid symbols instead of login prompt I have got
SLIP compiled in also... It is not a PPP problem because I am unable to get
even login prompt when I dial up.

So my ppp-on scripts were not working so I used minicom to see , but insted of
prompt I got trash on screen


I have just compiled and installed kernel-2.2.0 pre4 release version.and
It is running fine...

Please email your suggestions to my email given at top.


= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.2, SAMBA and Win98,   Question resolved.  Now is there a
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 20:51:42 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inside the Win98 cd there is a note about that, search for *.txt and read
it...

Athan

you'd find an awfull lot of .txt files.  How bout going to your c:\windows 
directory and looking for a file called network.txt.  Then, using your 
favourite editor, (mine is TECO) search for SAMBA



Mark

**  Remove ".nospam" when replying or email will bounce back to you...

--

From: "Artur Rodrigues" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: 

Linux-Networking Digest #806

1999-01-07 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #806, Volume #9   Thu, 7 Jan 99 11:13:35 EST

Contents:
  PLEASE DON'T REPLY: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Best way to setup Proxy/Mail servers on RH 5.2 ("Tim Underwood")
  Re: NIC (NE2000) not configured on new system ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Problem building C-Kermit on Linux (Redhat) 5.2 (Frank da Cruz)
  Re: POP3 Redhat 5.0 (Benjohn007)
  Shadow + NIS + Solaris (Maciek Uhlig)
  Re: Get ip-up and ip-down to "echo" some information (Choon-Cheng Chee (remove 
"removethis" in my e-mail))
  Suse Linux And Win98 in network for dummy (Laurent Deleu)
  Networked logon (Adam Evans)
  Problem Compiling GTK+ (jean philippe LIOT)
  Re: Connect 2 NIC's to one Samba server? ("Bill the Human Half")
  Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server (Choon-Cheng Chee (remove "removethis" in 
my e-mail))
  ppp over leased line problem ("axw")
  smbmount'ing NT share: weird time and date problems (Heiko Hellweg)
  Trendnet 16 pnp install help? ("Jim Williams")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: PLEASE DON'T REPLY: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 13:54:43 GMT

anarkissed wrote:

 Dude, if you had read anything about linux you'd have noticed that unlike
 windoze for idiots, it requires intelligence to install.  The kind of
 intelligence that realizes that you don't abuse ppl who give you tech
 support for FREE on software you got for FREE just because they don't have
 the perfect answer for you.  so, like, if you really wanna solve your
 problem, put the computer back in the box it came from, send it back return
 to sender and give the reason as "too stupid to operate a computer" then,
 get out your etch-a-sketch and swear to your heart's content.  Or, better
 yet, sign up for that new web tv, you don't have to know ANYTHING to use it!

 DG wrote in message 3692dcca.14993607@news...
 ANOTHER MENTALLY RETARDED PIGFART !!!
 
 On Sat, 02 Jan 1999 20:20:28 GMT, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
 You asked for help, and we tried to give you help.  If you want to think
 that we are
 "stupid idiots" then that's your problem, but just remember who asked who
 for help and
 who cannot get it working in the first place.
 please try to remember that we are NOT experts (well mabye some of us..I'm
 not) we are
 all learning,,if somoene gives you an answer thatis not correct then move
 on to the
 next answer or rephrase the question!
 Good luck!
 
 ***ARROWOFTHEMORNINGSTAR
 
 DG wrote:
 
  Fine, I'll take it there then. I ask a question and end up with most
  people giving mentally retarded answers in return but that's o.k. The
  world's full of stupid idiots.
 
  On Sun, 03 Jan 1999 03:25:00 +0900, Mike Thoreson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
  
   Hi. i do apologize if my message sounds a bit too long but at least
   you all will be able to figure out the sticky problem I'm stuck with
   and may even know how to help me out of it. I currently am running
   Windows 98 on one hard disk. However, since it is 7.5 GB and it's
   32-bit, Linux  won't recognize it when I first install Linux...
 snip
  
   P.S:
   PLEASE DO NO TELL ME TO USE ANOTHER VERSION OF UNIX SINCE I KINDA AM
   USED TO RH LINUX. ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME HOW TO PARTITION MY
 HARD
   DRIVE SINCE MY 75. GB HARD DRIVE IS NEARLY FILLED UP...  snip
  
   Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
   past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
  
 
  -
 ---
  
  This may not be the complete solution, but it is something to consider.
 The first
  issue is your vfat32 partition. That is a kernel issue and not RedHat
 specific. I
  have read that kernel 2.0.36 is able to access a vfat32 partition. I
 can't verify
  that, but I am using a development kernel 2.1.132 which has no problem
 with my
  Win98 vfat32 partition. Your problem as I see it, is that the basic
 kernel image
  you have downloaded isn't set up to handle a vfat32 partition. I know
 with your
  wining personality you could find someone who can build you a custom
 kernel image
  with the necessary modules built in so that it can access your vfat32
 partition.
  Then use windows to download everything you need, to your 7 GB drive.
 Oh and you
  need loadlin. There's HOWTOs available via HTML on how to use loadlin.
 Reboot to a
  dos prompt and boot linux from your vfat32 partition using loadlin and
 the
  customized kernel image. This would get around your ethernet card
 problem, until
  you have a full Linux system running.
  
  Also I would think you need more then just 2 floppy disks. You would
 need the
  entire base system on floppys. That way you would have all the basic
 

Linux-Networking Digest #807

1999-01-07 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #807, Volume #9   Thu, 7 Jan 99 14:13:54 EST

Contents:
  Re: Load Balancing web servers... (Bill Anderson)
  Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! (Doug)
  Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA (Simon)
  NFS Trouble (Alex Smtih)
  ping prog (Alexander Beston)
  Re: pppd and ppp speed (Clifford Kite)
  leased line pppd problem ("axw")
  Re: Connect 2 NIC's to one Samba server? (Kevin Meek)
  keeping two ppp connection alive? (Brian Gilman)
  TTY Settings When Telnetting ("Tony D. Berry")
  Cannot login to samba server (S P Arif Sahari Wibowo)
  Dial-up problems with RH Linux 5.1 (Bruce Skinner)
  ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ??? (Chris)
  Re: RH5.2PPP Can anyone decipher this??? /var/log/messages (Ville Nummela)
  PCMCIA/D-link 660/RH5.1 ethernet problems (Bernard J.Kozioziemski)
  How to Setup Bootp on a cluster ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Netscape 4.5=DUD !? (cglur)



From: Bill Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load Balancing web servers...
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 08:47:34 -0700

Nathan Gilbert wrote:
 
 Dave Leger wrote:
 
  Good day!
 
  I'm running a very heavely loaded web server.  I've added more ram, etc,
  but I believe it's now time to balnce the load and a second machine
  using DNS round robining.
 
  My questions is...   How to I mirror the two (or more) machines hard
  drive?  Some content is static, but other content is dynamic?  Should I
  mount machine one's hard drive on machine two and link databases from
  one to the other?
 
 First of all stock apache is setup to only allow something like 256
 simultaneous connections.  You can edit the source to allow more users to
 log in, you'll have to check the apache docs to find out exactly how to do
 this.  It's pretty clear and simple.
 
 Second apache has a module that you can build into it to perform mirroring
 of web servers.  A combonation of that module, and rdist should allow you to
 split the load between machines.
 
 Thirdly you are going to want to do some bandwidth calculations to figure
 out exactly how many simultanious users you can actually support on your
 current connection.


I would say determine if your load is cpu/IO based.
If it is IO, is it Disk or Network?
If Disk, SCSI? RAID? these would be likely options.
If Network, multiple NICs?

I do agree that you would need to do some calculations to determine
where, specifically, your laod is, and how much it is.

Bill Anderson

--

From: Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!!
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:23:44 +

Since you resolved your problems and are smarter than everyone in the group,it would 
be nice if you
shared your wealth of knowledge of Linux with others.
Doug

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 FTP INSTALL FINALLY WORKED THANKS TO CROSSBONES !!!
 Well, except for me and Crossbones, all of you are none more than
 f** idiots. But it's been fun insulting everyone one of you, who
 were against me, in this newsgroup. In fact, when you look at the
 thread(s), it probably reminds you of Jerry Springer. Now I did not ask
 for this, you all forced me into it, so don't even f** blame me !!!
 Anyway, it was fun fighting like in the Springer shows but I gotta go
 now, so
 GOOD-BYE TO ALL YOU MENTALLY RETARDED IDIOTS OUT THERE WHO CAN'T BE HELPFUL THE WAY 
I WANT IT !!!


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 21:02:11 GMT

On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 22:16:14 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey Greer)
wrote:

Hello Linux users,

I'm a networking dummy.  I've looked at SAMBA.org's doc's and others, but I
don't know where to start.  

try home.tvd.be/ws35056/linux/samba.html

Simon

--

From: Alex Smtih [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NFS Trouble
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:46:34 -0700

I am having problems exporting directories on my Linux box.  I am
running RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36)

I've read through the man pages (several times) and I am not having any
luck.  The problem is not exporting the file systems, but mapping the
UID/GID.  I can't seem to over ride the default all_squash property
which maps all UID's to nobody.  I am using entries in my export file
that look like this:
/path(rw,no_root_squash)
/path2host(rw,no_root_squash)

Neither work in regards to UID mapping.  I have RW access, but as nobody

that is pretty useless.

By the way, Yes I am restarting mountd and nfsd.

Any ideas?


--

From: Alexander Beston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ping prog
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 16:15:34 +


hi people

need a ping prog to tell speed of a connection to network

thanks

mail 

Linux-Networking Digest #808

1999-01-07 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #808, Volume #9   Thu, 7 Jan 99 17:13:27 EST

Contents:
  Re: PPP/Online with Cwix.com ISP ("Tim Underwood")
  Re: Two ip addresses on one NIC (Hajo Simons)
  Re: Networked logon (Hajo Simons)
  Re: What is a proxy (Mark Cooperstein)
  Force pppd to report actual connection speed, instead of local port speed (Chee 
Choon Cheng (remove "removethis" to e-mail me))
  Digital UNIX - Alpha LINUX NFS performance ? (Kiyoshi Yoda)
  Routing question (plus a ppp problem) (JJ)
  Re: 2nd level DNS Server ("greyman")
  Re: Cannot login to samba server (Mark Cooperstein)
  dynamic addressing w/ Ethernet? ("Michael Wise")
  Re: Replace NetWare w/Linux? (Matt Cudworth)
  Re: PPP in RH 5.2 - revisited ("A.G.")
  Re: SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily unavailable ("Danny Harvison")
  slow nfs (Amit Mehrotra)
  Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA (Jeffrey Greer)
  Re: Ipfwadm queries (Tom Elsesser)



From: "Tim Underwood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: PPP/Online with Cwix.com ISP
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 14:03:40 GMT

I am having the same problem.  I have run minicom, and the only response you
get after connection is what appears to be a port id.
Something like:

(613456)

If you hit enter, you just get the same string sent back.  Seemingly any
other input terminates the connection with "host not found".

Timothy Buckelew wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Draco wrote:

 Hi,
 I am wondering about my ISP and Linux.  My ISP, Cwix.com, formerly
 MCI2000.com, contains no tech support or anything related to Linux, as
 do probably most ISPs.  When I try to connect through EzPPP in Linux, I
 can't get on.  It never asks for a password or login name.  I have tried
 using the terminal window and it still will not ask for that info. I was
 wondering if anyone knows anything I should do, or should I just get a
 new ISP??
 Thanks.
 John

  I suggest you analyze what the ISP is sending you, using minicom.
See attached notes.
Timothy Buckelew





--

From: Hajo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Two ip addresses on one NIC
Date: 6 Jan 1999 22:52:31 GMT

Andrew Ip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Is it possible to do it?  As far as I know Mac can bind two ip on one card
 with VicomSoft's Internet Gateway.  Thanks.

ifconfig eth0 192.168.231.1
ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.231.2
ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.231.3
ifconfig eth0:2 192.168.231.4
ifconfig eth0:3 192.168.231.5
...

--
Hajo


--

From: Hajo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networked logon
Date: 6 Jan 1999 23:01:51 GMT

Adam Evans adam@'working-hard'.cje.co.uk wrote:

 I wish to have several Linux boxes on a network.
 A high powered system as the server, and the other systems as a sort of
 client. I would like to store all account information on the server. So that
 the other linux boxes won't need to be touched, and all updates will be made
 to the server.
 Can anybody tell if this is possible, and where to find out further info??
 I've searched but can't seem to find any info.

A good place to start is 
# apropos nis
or
# man ypserv

--
Hajo


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re: What is a proxy
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 02:03:35 GMT

In article 77085n$qdj$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Alain Lussier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
Hello to all,

What is a proxy server ? Anyone could tell me where to find technicals about
it. I need to write some socket stuff but it has to work through proxy
server.

I am using ipfw with linux , Is it the same thing ?


Thanks.

Alain
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



A proxy server is a kind of firewall.  I am familiar with Wingate proxy 
server, and am just delving into the Linux world, so I can tell you how 
Wingate works as a proxy server, which may help you to understand how proxy 
servers work, although this is definately not an authoritative response!

A proxy server provides different IP services.  It acts as a "go between" one 
network, and another: ie: the Internet and your LAN.  On your LAN
 you have a proxy server that is known to the Internet by some IP address.  In 
my case, its dynamically doled out from a pool of available IP's from my ISP, 
although it's possible to have a permanent "static" IP  to the Internet.  The 
proxy server is setup to listen to different TCP protocols, such as HTTP, FTP, 
SOCKS, POP3, SMTP to name a few.  On the local side of the network, your 
network client has to be "proxy aware" to communicate to the proxy server.  
Netscape and Internet Explorer can be setup to connect "directly" to the 
Internet, or through a proxy server.  If the latter, you need to let Netscape 
know the name (or IP address) of your proxy server, and what ports to use for 
its available protocols.  Usually, with most web browsers, 

Linux-Networking Digest #814

1999-01-08 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #814, Volume #9   Fri, 8 Jan 99 05:13:35 EST

Contents:
  Higher than 115k serial i/o ("Kris Jordan")
  please help me!! ("medecs")
  Re: RH5.1 / NetGear FA310TX / @Home / tulip.c 0.89K (Troutman)
  Network connection fails after early success ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: cannot ftp from win95 ftp server (Bill Berry)
  Re: Possible Red Hat pppd routing poblem ("James  Higgins")
  Frame capture/analysis software? (DWR)
  Re: dynamic addressing w/ Ethernet? (Ryan Stapleton)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (David Fox)
  Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! (Iain)
  Re: Ethernet card recommendation--urgent (Thomas Klettke)
  Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! ("Charles Stack")
  RH5.2PPP Can anyone decipher this??? /var/log/messages ("Curtis Ross")
  Re: SEE YA' LATER SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHA !!! (Tom Elsesser)
  Re: Connection refused from remote X-Windows (David Efflandt)
  Re: driver (Mike)
  Re: dns newbie (Jan Stifter)
  ftp stuff (Eric Melville)
  IP masq + mIRC DCC send = broke ?? (Spawn)
  Re: cant connect to apache ("Wizard")
  cannot ftp from win95 ftp server (Bill Berry)
  Masquerading (Ronald Schierer)
  Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA (Bob Hauck)
  Changing MAC address ("Sander Pilon")
  Have a small problem yet an important one ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: "Kris Jordan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Higher than 115k serial i/o
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 22:16:10 -0800

I'd like to know if there is a isa serial i/o card that would work in linux
at speeds higher than 115kbs.  I saw a Telebyte Model 480 Isa:

Dual Port
Data Rate to 460 KBPS
32K Buffers For Tx and Rx 16C650
Selectable Com1-Com4

I only need the one port.  But it does not list linux as compatible.

Thank you,

Kris Jordan




begin 666 O Card.url
M6TEN=5R;F5T4VAOG1C=71=#0I54DP]:'1T#HO+W=W=RYT96QE8GET975S
C82YC;VTO8V%T86QO9R]PF]D=6-TR\T.# N:'1M#0H`
`
end



--

From: "medecs" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: please help me!!
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1999 14:49:47 +0800

can somebody give me a short briefing how to secure a DNS using BIND
software



--

From: Troutman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RH5.1 / NetGear FA310TX / @Home / tulip.c 0.89K
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 11:04:15 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Karl Schuster wrote:
 but, instead use:
 
gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet -Wall \
   -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c \
   `[ -f /usr/include/linux/modversions.h ]  echo -DMODVERSIONS`
 
 It's located in the bottom of the source code of tulip.c in a little
 comment block.  Also, this is for a modular kernel, not a monolithic
 kernel.  Note: that "-O6" reads "dash-oh-six", _not_ "dash-zero-six."

Thanks for the tips.  Will try both versions on card today and get back
to you ;-/

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network connection fails after early success
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 15:51:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am encountering a problem and need help fixing it.
First the particulars of my setup:

Thinkpad 770
3Com 575TX PCMCIA Ethernet card
Redhat Linux 5.1
Kernel upgraded to 2.0.36
Latest PCMCIA package
Connecting to an Ethernet network with a DHCP server somewhere.

The problem:  After booting linux, I issue the command:
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start eth0
as root.  Sometimes I get the message that DHCP...failed and
sometimes I get the message that DHCP...OK.  In both cases however
it appears that eth0 has been configured and that a default route
appears when I do a netstat -rn.  I am able to ping, telnet,
traceroute, do dns lookups, etc. for a couple of minutes.  After
approximately 2 to 3 minutes however, network operations fail.
Pings return 100% loss, traceroutes never make the first hop, telnets
hang, and so forth.  The network card still looks configured when
I issue an ifconfig eth0.  Netstat -rn still returns the necessary
routing information.  I am not running any routing daemons (gated or
routed)  Stopping the network (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop) and
restarting the network will get the network to work again for another
couple of minutes and then I'm back in the same situation.

TCP/IP works when I boot win95 so I do not believe it is hardware
problem or an external network problem.

I am perplexed as to what to try next.  I've read the FAQs, HOWTOs and
other documentation, but perhaps I have overlooked something.  I
would appreciate any help or points anyone could provide.

Thanks,
Todd

==
Todd Bruner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Berry)
Subject: Re: cannot ftp from win95 ftp server
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 17:07:10 GMT

Never mind, I think I 

Linux-Networking Digest #815

1999-01-08 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #815, Volume #9   Fri, 8 Jan 99 08:14:10 EST

Contents:
  Re: ppp problems on RH5.1, please help!! (Medway NHS Trust)
  Re: help with route, please (Medway NHS Trust)
  Re: Linux firewall doesn't forward anything - HELP!! (Jan Stifter)
  Re: firewall tool for linux? (Ulrich Eckhardt)
  ipop3d missing (No Spam)
  Using multiple ISPs with ISDN and controlling this from a win9x box on the 
masqueraded network (Jan Oosting)
  Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  No login promt when dialing in to Linux box ("wa")
  Modem to Modem/Faxswitch problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PPP/Online with Cwix.com ISP ("Daniel P. Fraga")
  telnet Windows95: thrashes utmp on exit and now can telnet no more... (Luigi Fabbro)
  Leafnode - few articles (Pietro Montelatici)
  Re: IP Accounting (Torsten Blank)
  Re: Higher than 115k serial i/o (Mark Cooperstein)
  Re: ICQ, IRC, Realplayer behind SOCKS Proxy Firewall ??? (Jon Barnett)
  Re: PPP Dial-Up Access S L O W! (Marco Haakmeester)
  Destination unreachable from localhost ? (Ryszard Lach)
  Re: cant connect to apache ("Matt Chipman")
  Re: how to start a small ISP? (ian)
  Re: ftpd won't allow uploads ("Matt Chipman")
  Why does nfsd re-export WITHOUT --re-export option ??? (Harald Michael Fuchs)
  nfsd: Could not bind name to socket ? (Harald Michael Fuchs)
  Re: ipop3d missing ("greyman")
  Re: Have a small problem yet an important one ("greyman")
  Fax error ("Wemmer Alexander " [EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: Medway NHS Trust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ppp problems on RH5.1, please help!!
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:26:04 +

In article 76ubph$l86$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
Hi,

I'm having problems getting ppp setup on RH 5.1.
I'm new to linux so I'd appreciate it if any responses could be in simple
english.
I've set up all the scripts and they seem to be correct.
When I try pppd I get some S*!t about the kernel not being set up to support
ppp,  to be perfictly honest I don't have a clue about this. I've been
looking in my 'book' for help but none comes.

PLEASE,  PLEASE HELP.

Thanks in advance,

Paul Eastman.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Make sure that you've got IP aliasing  IP forwarding enabled in the
kernel, and you can allocate upto 255 (?) addresses to  a card.

eg.

ifconfig eth0 up 195.106.41.1
ifconfig eth0:1 up 195.106.42.1

and then add the routes.


-- 
Medway NHS Trust

--

From: Medway NHS Trust [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help with route, please
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 09:30:36 +

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stefan Reitshamer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I setup my Toshiba 4020CDT laptop with 16-bit 3COM ethernet card, 
dual-booting Linux (Redhat 5.2) and NT 4.0.
In NT, the network card works fine.
When I installed Linux, I chose not to configure networking.
However, when I boot, I see lots of messages that networking
services were started.
But I can't ping anything on my local subnet.
(PPP networking works great, by the way).

Is there a way to configure networking without reinstalling Linux?

Thanks a bunch,

- Stefan Reitshamer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Have a look at /etc/sysconfig/network
and in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/
there should be config files for all your adapters
ie.

ifcfg-eth0 for your first NIC and so on.


-- 
Medway NHS Trust

--

Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1999 20:04:39 +0100
From: Jan Stifter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux firewall doesn't forward anything - HELP!!

Neil Robinson wrote:
 
 The following roughly represents the configuration I have set up. The
 Internet connection is  leased line.
 
Internet

   |
   |
a.b.c.d
Cisco 2503 router
-
e.f.g.145
   |
   |
 eth110BaseTe.f.g.146
 Linux Firewall
 --
 eth0   100BaseT  192.168.2.60
   |
   |
  Hub
---
| | | | | | | |
| |   |
| |   |
  192.168.2.1 |   192.168.2.3
  |
 Hub
   ---
   | | | | | | | |
   | |   |
   | 192.168.2.50
   |
  Hub
---
| | | | | | | |
| |   |
 
 The above more or less resembles our network setup. I 

Linux-Networking Digest #823

1999-01-09 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #823, Volume #9   Sat, 9 Jan 99 02:13:48 EST

Contents:
  Re: ~user accounts (me)
  Re: NOSPAM in addresses.. (William Burrow)
  Re: /usr over nfs? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: How to build chat room with in Linux? (Christian Marcelo C Pinheiro)
  Re: Newbie question ("Eugene")
  Re: MAC clients on Linux fileserver (Bryan)
  Re: ipfwadm errors: can someone explain? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Caldera OpenLinux 1.1  NE2000 (T.L. (Terry Branscombe))
  Re: netatalk almost (Bryan)
  Re: Strange Networking problem (Brad Luce)
  Re: PPP in RH 5.2 - "ifup ppp0" ??? (ppp0 netmask woes) ("A.G.")
  Re: does anybody know how to connect to an NT4 share using smbclient? (T.L. (Terry 
Branscombe))
  icmp errors, info needed (Donald Chan)
  Re: Newbie question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Chat - not with my modem it won't! (Basil Fowler)
  Re: Linux Samba Domain Controller Server Problem (Dan Falk)
  Point of Sale (POS) Solutions? ("Jason P. Stanford")
  Re: Anyone doing Dial-On-Demand? (Bryan)



From: rob@K4175150 (me)
Subject: Re: ~user accounts
Date: 8 Jan 1999 16:43:03 GMT

Matt Chipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: This account and the directory is called "matt" not "~matt"  so how and when
: does the "~" come into things?

: Even a web page url with an explanation on the ~user accounts issue would be
: a big help.

In general, the "~" is just a shorthand for the complete path
to that users home-directory. It's extracted from /etc/passwd, where
the home for each user is (should be) specified. So ~matt should
be read as home-dir-of-matt-wherever-that-is ;)
Greets,
rob

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Burrow)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NOSPAM in addresses..
Date: 9 Jan 1999 04:13:40 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 9 Jan 1999 02:06:50 GMT,
Wisquatuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In comp.os.linux.networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 How about a happy medium.  The purpose of putting nospam in your
 return address is to keep from getting spam.  I think a standard of
 nospam.realuserid@realdomain would meet this requirement.
 Everyone would know who sent the message.

Including the spammers.  My problem with that approach is that it
would do nothing to stop spam, and yet -still- be a (minor) irritation
to people trying to do e-mail replies.

Well, another idea that occurs to me is this.  The ISP provides users
with two email IDs.  One for general email use, the second for use with
USENET messages as a valid reply address.  The client software is somehow
smart enough to know that one of the email address is exclusively for
replies from USENET.  

The messages in this mailbox are filtered against a list of subject lines
used when posting to newsgroups.  This might take up some storage for
prolific authors, but it is only hypothetical anyway.  There are other
difficulties, but the biggest is technological -- the software to do this
is simply not here.  It might be an idea for someone like AOL, however.



-- 
William Burrow  --  New Brunswick, Canada o
Copyright 1999 William Burrow ~  /\
~  ()()

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /usr over nfs?
Date: 9 Jan 1999 04:53:00 GMT

Markus Hauke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

: I´d like to install Linux on a Network of about 10 PC´s. One of them
: should be a nfs server with lots of disk space. My question is:
: Is it possible to install my Linux distribution with all the needed
: programs on the server and then do a "mount -t nfs server:/usr /usr" on
: all clients???

Of course it is possible, only binaries in /bin and /sbin, and libraries in
/lib are required to get the system and network running. After you get the 
network up you can mount the /usr and start any services you like. Any 
decent distribution will do this automatically if put a similar line to the 
following in /etc/fstab:
server:/usr /usr nfs defaults 0 0

I guess you would also like to share home directories as well. If so, then 
you should also consider using NIS so that user passwords are kept only in 
one place. And of course mails should be centralized too. Well, all depending 
on your needs, of course.

Few hints I have found useful:
- Put configuration files (and directories) that are common to all clients 
  in /usr/local/etc (or similar) and on clients make symlinks from 
  /usr/local/etc to /etc. That way you only need to modify one file 
  instead of ten. Some of the files I have moved:
* /etc/profile, /etc/profile.d
* /etc/hosts.{allow,deny}
* /etc/[zck]sh*
* all directoties under /etc/X11  (on RedHat at least this works)
- Restart NFS server and portmapper frequently (in crontab). I found out
  that the portmapper stops working after a while, a couple of days or so.
  This will keep it running, a 

Linux-Networking Digest #844

1999-01-11 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #844, Volume #9  Mon, 11 Jan 99 01:13:33 EST

Contents:
  Re: HELP!! ADSL  @Home Cable on one Machine!! (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: pppd and user permissions (Warren Mira)
  Re: Cannot send packets outside the network (Warren Mira)
  nfs with smp (smp_spins) (Frantzcy Paisible)
  Re: Automatically cut ppp link (Dale Lakes)
  Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server (Dale Lakes)
  Re: ppp with isdn (Joe Zeff)
  Re: PPP 2.2 - Authentication? (TjL)
  ppp-2.3.5 and kernel 2.2.0-pre6 (Karl Staas)
  Re: pppd and user permissions (Frank Hale)
  Re: Creating Dial-Up accounting in X? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: su won't let me shutdown/ifconfig (Ronny Haryanto)
  problem with LAN + PPP (Patrick Gagnon)
  Redhat 5.2 - Can't Get Internet Access Going ("Steve")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: HELP!! ADSL  @Home Cable on one Machine!!
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 19:19:02 -0800

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
says...
 All regular trafic on adsl line
 ftpd on @home Cable line
 Problem 1.. only one routing table
 Problem 2.. @home uses dhcp.. so my ip changes (although P 1 
 is my main concern)

Let's call your @home interface eth0 and your adsl interface eth1.

You can configure your DHCP client (dhcpcd) to listen on eth0. You can 
configure dhcpcd to run a shell script when it successfully gets an IP 
address (dhcpcd has a command line option for this: "-c filename").

The following environment variables (amongst others) are set and passed 
to the shell script: HOSTNAME, ROUTER, IPADDR, NETMASK and BROADCAST.

So you need a shell script that will set up the routing table that you 
want and set the appropriate metric values. By using metric values, you 
can set up two default routes to two different gateways (one for @home 
and one for adsl) but have one route be preferred over the other. This 
way, most traffic will be routed over eth1 (adsl) rather than eth0 
(@home). This should solve problem #2.

Of course, the solution to problem #2 routes all of your traffic and 
can't be applied to individual protocols. So if somebody makes an ftp 
connection to your box via eth0 (@home), will the packets leaving your 
machine for his go out over eth1 (adsl)? I suspect that they might. So 
you will also need to use ipfwadm to deny outgoing ftp packets on eth1 
(adsl, the preferred default route). Since there is a second default 
route, the packets should then go out eth0 (@home, the second default 
route). This should solve problem #1.

You will probably want to deny incoming ftp traffic on eth1 (adsl) so 
that people can only ftp to your machine via eth0 (@home). In fact, you 
should probably use ipfwadm to secure your linux box on all the other 
ports, leaving open only those services that you need (ftp, http, smtp, 
pop, icmp, etc.)

I haven't tried this, but I think that it'll work.

Good luck.
-- 
Luca Filipozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My views don't represent my employer's.

--

Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:28:51 +0800
From: Warren Mira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pppd and user permissions

# chown root.root /usr/sbin/pppd

then make a symbolic link of pppd to /usr/bin..hope this helps..

Frank Hale wrote:

 I have a perl script which connects to my isp. It needs to call pppd and
 the script works fine for root but it won't work as a user. The error
 message says

 /usr/sbin/pppd: using the name option requires root privilege

 I have set the permissions to setuid. At least I think I have I did a
 chmod 4755 on it. How can I get the pppd program to work with users?

 --
 From:  Frank Hale
 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ICQ:   7205161
 Homepage:  http://members.xoom.com/frankhale/
 Jade:  http://jade.netpedia.net/


--

Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:31:49 +0800
From: Warren Mira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cannot send packets outside the network

can u post a copy of your routing table?

Narayan Parameshwar wrote:

 Hi!

 I am a beginer with linux. I have installed RedHat 5.2 on my
 computer which has  3com 3c509 ethernet card. The address of the machine
 is 192.168.100.111.  I have the following problem:

 I am able  ping or telnet to a machine within our network (such
 as 192.168.100.101). However, I cannot send IP packets outside my
 network. I have specified 192.168.100.100 as the gateway (which is our
 router) and DNS (which is on our ISP network)  address is also
 specified. I do not have any host specific routes or  any other entries
 in the routing table. The packets do not even leave the machine. I get
 network unreachable error message. This occurs regardless of whether I
 entered name of the machine or a specific IP address.

I have not specified any netmask. It does not work even if i
 specifiy any netmask. But I think the problem is in the proper
 specification of netmasks. I 

Linux-Networking Digest #849

1999-01-11 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #849, Volume #9  Mon, 11 Jan 99 14:13:45 EST

Contents:
  Re: large packet loss and DUPS with 3com and RH5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Treiber für AAA-Controller (Sven Röthig)
  Re: Sygate/Nat32 equivalent for linux ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: Problem w second NE2000 card (Rob van der Putten)
  Attaching to Novell and NT servers (Asher Green)
  Re: cant get Samba to work right ("Thomas Bendler")
  Re: cant get Samba to work right (Roland Wagner)
  Networking with linux and win98 (Chip Transisto)
  Help! Connection refused!! ("Perus")
  eth0 IRQ conflict choices ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: NIS login with network down (Thorsten Kukuk)
  Linux machine on NT network (Arthur Amezcua)
  Re: Linux vs WIN NT (Mark Andal)
  Re: samba and netatalk ? (Miguel Cruz)
  Ethernet slow under Linux (Intel EtherExpress16) (John Meissen)
  buffer overflow ("Artur Rodrigues")
  Re: problem with MSCHAP 80 need help please (Carl Koeppl)
  Re: pppd error message (Clifford Kite)
  Re: X server on win98 - now what (Joe Ringer)
  Apache keep alive cron (Yaron)
  question regarding US Robotics 56K v.90 external modem. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large packet loss and DUPS with 3com and RH5.2
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:44:01 GMT

Hi,

thanks for the advive.  Disabling plug and play worked!

My RH 5.2 found my 3com card and all seemed well with the install.  BUT not
able to ping to another machine.  All I did was disable the PNP and it
worked.  I didn't even change the IRQ or i/o address.  just disabling the pnp
did the trick.




In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hi,
 
  I am setting up a linux box as a file server at our school. I installed
RedHat
  4.2 which went smooth.  I am not able to ping any of our Mac or PC clients.
  (Although sometimes I get a response with DUPS and large packet loss) I
  installed the networking option and it is enabled.  3COM card was
recognized.
  Cabling is fine since our NT is working ok with the same hub and cables,
even
  tried changing the cables.
 
  Here is my setup
  Linux box IP 192.168.1.1
  255.255.255.0
  Clients 192.168.1.2 etc.
  gateway 192.168.1.254  (not connected to any other networks, just connected
a
  few clients to test so far, no Internet access)

   If the gateway is not connected to other networks, and you have
forward_ipv4
 enabled then you may have problem.
   Please go to your /etc/sysconfig and send us the 'network' file
as well as the
 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.
   Try to disable forwarding by editing you /etc/sysconfig/network
and setting
 the FORWARD_IPV4=no .

  Tried both enable route and disable route
  not using DNS yet, just Hosts file.
 
 
  I read a lot about the plug and play NIC.  I didn't disable the PP but I am
  assuming that because the install recognized my card and I am able to ping
  the card, there is no problems with the I/O or IRQ.  Maybe  am wrong to
  assume this.

   The only problem that I can think of, is whether your NIC
defaults (due to
 the pnp) to 10base2 port instead of the UTP one. To be sure, why don't you set
it
 to non-pnp mode, using the disk provided with the 509b (ensuring that the
10baseT port
 is enabled) ?

 --
 p94003@rainbow.**NOSPAM**.cs.unipi.gr
 remove **NOSPAM** to reply !



= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sven Röthig)
Subject: Treiber für AAA-Controller
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:27:54 +0100

hat jemand die Raid-Controller am laufen ??

sven



--

From: "Jeff Volckaert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sygate/Nat32 equivalent for linux
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:58:43 -0500

With redhat 5.x you don't need to recompile the kernel unless you need
ipautofw (which is needed for games and conferencing).  Just install redhat
and run the ipfwadm commands.

Jeff Volckaert

Robert C. Paulsen, Jr. wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Andrew Kaplan wrote:

 I'm curious what the easiest method is for using Linux to share a modem
 amongst several machines on a mixed Linux/Windows LAN...basically having
 linux do the same thing that Sygate or other NAT programs for windoze
 does.


It's called IP Masquerading and it's amazingly simple, assuming your
kernel has the support compiled in. Actually, it's not too hard even if
you need to recompile the kernel:

1) Compile firewalling and masquerading into the kernel (just say "yes"
to those two choices when doing "make config").
2) Add the following two lines somewhere towards the end of your
initialization scripts (I put them in /etc/rc.d/rc.local):

 ipfwadm -F -d deny
 ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0

3) Set up 

Linux-Networking Digest #850

1999-01-11 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #850, Volume #9  Mon, 11 Jan 99 16:13:47 EST

Contents:
  How to set up a DNS ?? (Ashutosh Sharma)
  Re: How to setup routing? ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: Proxy + firewall ("David H.")
  Programming packet burst and long file names ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Programming packet burst and long file names ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Newbie modem problem ("David H.")
  Re: pppd with Rockwell HCF PCI Internal modem ("David H.")
  Re: su won't let me shutdown/ifconfig (Sean McEwan)
  what to filter in a packet filter ("Jan Stifter")
  Re: ADSL (Chris)
  Re: Q: DHCP  static IP coexist on one card possible? (Chris)
  Re: Multiple NIC Cards.. HELP!! solution ("jay")
  DMZ setup (Erwann CORVELLEC)
  Re: SIOCADDRT: Invalid Argument ("Hans Verbeek")
  Re: Apache keep alive cron (Juergen Heinzl)
  Re: tcp wrappers - help with troubleshooting? (Juergen Heinzl)
  Re: Pentium with CD - 486 without ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: sendmail queuing not delivering (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
  Public_html ("R. Brett Juergens")
  Re: pppd error message ("Tim Underwood")
  [Q] RH 5.1 with 3c905B TX NIC card (Chang Cheng Chao)
  NFS from Win95 to Linux (Steve Ledford)



From: Ashutosh Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to set up a DNS ??
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 00:03:30 +0530


How can one set up a DNS on a linux box??
Please help.

Regards
Ashutosh


--

From: "Jeff Volckaert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to setup routing?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:42:31 -0500

Where is your default route?  Try "route add default ppp0" if you want your
Net traffic to go out the dial up.  Switch ppp0 for eth0 if you want Net
traffic to go out the firewall.

You firewall is probably blocking incoming Net stuff for your own good.  You
should be able to telnet to the ppp0 address though.

Can you telnet to eth1?

Jeff Volckaert

Conrad Hagemans wrote in message 77b6m6$9b5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a Red Hat (5.1) Linux box setup that is hooked up to the internet
with a PPP connection to our ISP.
I have a network card installed to hook the box onto out local network. And
i added a second networkcard to
connect the machine to other servers in front of the firewall. The box has
an official IP address.

Our company has an official c-class domain. 195.240.233.0

Our internal network is using an in-official network range (but is behind
the firewall) 120.120.0.0

The PPP connection has ip address 195.240.233.1
The internal network card ip address 120.120.18.111
The card for use in front of the firewall IP address 195.240.233.10

I connected the in front the fireall card to a hub to link the box to an
extra server with IP address 195.240.233.20

This server cannot be reached from the internet. Why???

Here are some printouts from the routing table and the rc.local with the
ipfwadm statements:

Kernel IP routing table
Destination GatewayGenmask   Flags  MSS Window irtt Iface
154.9.48.67 0.0.0.0255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0   ppp0
195.240.233.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U1500 0 0
eth0
120.120.0.0  0.0.0.0255.255.0.0  U1500 0 0
eth1
127.0.0.0  0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0  U
3584
0 0   lo
0.0.0.0  154.9.48.67 0.0.0.0  UG 1500 0
0   ppp0

154.9.48.67 is the fixed IP address from the ISP side of the PPP
connection.
eth0 is the NIC in front of the firewall
eth1 is the NIC to the internal network

The rc.local file (fragement)
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 120.120.0.0/255.255.0.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D 195.240.233.0/255.255.255.0
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 195.240.233.0/255.255.255.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0

Can anyone help me to get this solved.






--

From: "David H." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proxy + firewall
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 13:07:44 -0600

I'd like info on that too.  I'm going to try to get a network with the
TCI@home network, and need a proxy server -- Proxy server connection (tci
proxies everything).  The sysadmin does not want the internet connection to
the hub, just to the one computer.


= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News 
 http://www.newsfeeds.com/   The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
= Over 66,000 Groups, Plus  a  Dedicated  Binaries Server 

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Subject: Programming packet burst and long file names
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:12:13 GMT

Hallo!

I've written a NetWare client for a non-PC, non-mac platform sometimes known
as Acorn RiscOS, but have run into two problems:

1.  When I try to scan a directory or open a file with a long file name
the server always returns an error.  I am setting the NameSpace byte(s)
to 0x04 for OS2 name space.
Is there 

Linux-Networking Digest #856

1999-01-12 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #856, Volume #9  Tue, 12 Jan 99 01:13:36 EST

Contents:
  Re: Trouble with networ-card ne2000 PCI (Yves Schlegel)
  Pioneer DRM-1804X jukebox drivers. (Nick Belnap)
  Re: database suggestions, please? ("Vance Greenway")
  Re: modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!! (Clifford Kite)
  Networking Question (Chris Sanders)
  Re: Samba and Appache setups ("Michael A. Irons")
  Re: linux firewall is getting a really bad speed hit (A Hart)
  Re: need ipchains example for simple network ("Robert L. Ziegler")
  Re: buffer overflow (Bistromath)
  Re: sendmail and smbd are SO slow on boot (Frank Sweetser)
  Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am 
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEELP !!! 
("anarkissed")
  Installing 3C509B NIC (Tim Taylor)
  Re: Netscape plug-ins ("Thomas Bendler")
  Help with digital camera checksum calculation - a challenge (Brian Miller)
  Re: win98 to Linux Networking Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: Yves Schlegel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Trouble with networ-card ne2000 PCI
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:33:03 +0100

Thank you very much, I already solved the problem. It was a false subnet-address. I 
used
192.168.1.1 instead of 192.168.1.0. That's why it couldn't use the netmask 
255.255.255.0. I set the
subnet to 192.168.1.0 and everything works fine!

Nevertheless, thank you very much for your help!
Yves

root wrote:

 Yves Schlegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Hello everyone out there!
 
  I'm new to linux and I faced some problems configuring the network. I'm
  using SuSE 5.3 with kernel 2.0.35.
  The loopback network is working very well, but not eth0. I'm using a
  NE2000-compatible PCI card with realtek8029-chip, it is correctly
  detected, but I can't ping on 192.168.1.1. When I ping the server on
  192.168.1.1 from a client, I just receive Host unreachable, when I ping
  127.0.0.1 it is reachable!

 The 127.0.0.1 that you are pinging (from the client) is not a 
server, but
 the loopback device of the client (e.g. win95)
 So first of all, have you given a valid ip address to the client ? 
e.g.
 192.168.1.2 since 192.168.1.1 is the address of the serrver.

  I saw that in startup there was an error-message, netmask not correct
  defined. But it should be correct becuase it is set to 255.255.255.0,
  broadcast 192.168.1.255, subnet 192.168.1.0.

 Do an ifconfig on the server, and let us know of the results. Your 
settings
 seem correct, although the 192.168.1.0 is really the network address since you are 
not
 subnetworking at the moment.
 By the way, if you ping 192.168.1.1 from the server, do you get a 
valid reply ?
 If yes, then the problem most probably is a misconfigured client.

 --
 p94003@rainbow.**NOSPAM**.cs.unipi.gr
 remove **NOSPAM** to reply !


--

Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:36:04 -0700
From: Nick Belnap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pioneer DRM-1804X jukebox drivers.

Does anyone know of a driver for a drm-1804x cd jukebox for Linux?


--

From: "Vance Greenway" @ricochet.net
Subject: Re: database suggestions, please?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:00:59 -0800

i just made the same decision and went with postgresql.  it handles large
databases just fine, has ample support online, is free and conforms to sql
standards.  mysql is also probably free depending on how you use it and is
supposed to be pretty good, though i hear it uses a special form of
sql...the details i do not know.  Also, informix is giving away their linux
products free to developers.  you can visit their site for more info.


Alice Dobry wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello:

I'm setting up a Linux web server, and need to choose a data base
as well.  The data base, when it's actually implemented, will be
updated periodically through the day and needs to be accessible
via CGI.  It also needs to interface with Java servlets, SQL, and
ODBC.  I have no other criteria other than the database will
become very large, lots of records, say 200 MB to 1 GB file
size.  It also needs to be transferable back to Windows NT in
case the boss says we're moving back to NT.

I've looked at SAL's home page of databases.  There are just so
many to choose from.  The big commercial guys (Informix, Oracle,
IBM DB2) offer mostly vague marketing material on their web
sites. I've been interested in some of the products from Europe.

Without rambling on more, I'm interested in whether one of you
could suggest a database for me.  The only real requirement is
that the database/server have quick performance given it will
likely be big, be well documented (I'm coming to Linux from
Windows), and be the Relational type.  I don't mind spending big
bucks on it if there are obvious advantages.

Thanks.  

Linux-Networking Digest #858

1999-01-12 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #858, Volume #9  Tue, 12 Jan 99 07:14:43 EST

Contents:
  Re: External ISDN adapter - Does it need to use mlppp? (Joe Zeff)
  modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!! (Ravi Iyengar)
  Re: LANalyzer for Linux? (ag)
  Re: Dhcp-2.0b1pl6 Problems (Philip Wall / Wild Card)
  Re: Beginner with Lots of Toys!!! (Frank Beamer)
  Re: D-Link DFE-530TX PCI (bob)
  Re: Routing problem with Redhat 5.2 ("Moshe Bar")
  Re: Where from I get the popclient software ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Networked PPP OK, but www.anysite.com fails anysite.com works! (Vik Olliver)
  Re: sendmail and smbd are SO slow on boot (Villy Kruse)
  Re: Sygate/Nat32 equivalent for linux (Dan Kegel)
  Re: SAMBA Linux to NT ("Colin F. Caughie")
  Re: Routing and DHCP (Rick Hicks)
  Re: win98, winNT, and Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: IP Masquerading and MSIE (C Sanjayan Rosenmund)
  Re: Who is my master browser? (Tim Kohlstedt)
  How do I deny ip packets? ("Terra")
  Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing? (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: Public_html (Gary Harmon)
  Linux "Proxy" Server for win95/98 Inet Access ("Ashley")
  caching named (Ronny Ranerup)
  Re: Pentium with CD - 486 without ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Remote X-terminal (Gilbert Jacolbia)
  Re: DHCPD + NFS Problem (Chris)
  Re: Multiple IP Adresses on one Network Card (Chris)
  Re: Linux ip accounting problem (Stephan Duehr)
  How to define IP accounting rules for NAT connections only (Stephan Duehr)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Zeff)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: External ISDN adapter - Does it need to use mlppp?
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 01:24:07 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein) wrote:

 If you've never gotten a mlppp 
connection, check with your ISP and see if they've enabled your account for a 
mlppp connection.  This ususally means giving your account for two 
simultaneous login's at one time (which normally they dont allow).

Don't bother.  The original poster is at Earthlink, and we do not
allow multiple logins under any circumstances.  You can get a two B
channel connection, but it's up to the routers at the PoP to give it
to you.  (Second channel gets the same IP, and if it's on a different
router, down it goes.)

---
Joe Zeff
 The Guy With the Sideburns
"Much of trouble-shooting consists of going down
 dead ends until one of them isn't."
http://www.lasfs.org


--

From: Ravi Iyengar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!!
Date: 12 Jan 1999 02:28:51 GMT

hi:

I am trying to get my PPP conn set up on my RH5.2 (2.0.36) and my modem
seems to hang when it reaches the 'OK-+++\c-OK' part of my dialer
script. I am using the dialer script as in the PPP HOWTO document.
The same thing happens when I use minicom too (I dunno where it hangs
in this case).
I am using an external modem and my serial port looks fine. I dont have
any conflicts (I/O port or IRQ). And the modem is not a winmodem.
I have a static IP from my ISP.
My /var/log/messages just says that my connect script failed.
The bizarre thing is when I run ppp-on, sometimes the modem doesnt dial
the specified number. It omits one or two numbers. I have never seen
this before.!
I am really exhausted and frustrated :-( Please Please somebody out
there
HELP ME PLEASE!!!

thanks a bunch
Partha

--

From: ag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LANalyzer for Linux?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:29:35 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Richard Steiner wrote:
 
 What does LANalyzer have for features?  What does it display, and how
 does it display it?
 


The main screen is called a "dashboard".  It has 3 analog instruments
(side by side) in Q1 and Q2.  The analog instruments show
packets/second, %utilization and errors/sec.  Three pushbuttons allow
you to select a network, server or router to display in the analog
meters.  

In Q3 and Q4, there is a scrollable listing of the machines on the
network and stats such as packet count in  out, pack velocity, errors,
etc.


It looks like other features include:

monitors
alarms
packet capture/time for logging


Definately an awesome looking tool.  It's a commercial product by
Novell


--

From: Philip Wall / Wild Card [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dhcp-2.0b1pl6 Problems
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:35:58 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Philip Wall / Wild Card wrote:
 
 I'm running Slackware 3.4, kernel 2.0.36 on a laptop. I'm trying to
 use ISC's dhcp-2.0b1pl16 on this machine for the extra scripting I can
 do in the DHCP client itself for setting up routes and IP's on networks
 I attach to that don't have a DHCP server.
   Problem I'm having is that with the 2.0 client all I see are
 "send_packet: Network is  unreachable" errors on networks that I know
 have DHCP servers. Mind you 

Linux-Networking Digest #861

1999-01-12 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #861, Volume #9  Tue, 12 Jan 99 18:13:47 EST

Contents:
  INN-2.1 man pages and more INN stuff (Allen Ahoffman)
  Re: PPP/Online with Cwix.com ISP (John Feldman)
  ppp0 vs ttyyS0 vs cau0 (John Feldman)
  routing problems + aliasing ("Lovro Vre¹")
  Re: Remotely killing X-server (mike burrell)
  Re: /usr over nfs? (Geoff Short)
  Only use host name alias as root? (Jeffery Cann)
  Re: ftp configuration problem ? (Luca Colombi)
  Re: e-mail system setup (Duncan Simpson)
  Re: Remote X-terminal (Charles Reindorf US/EE1 60/1/44 #44278)
  Re: ISA network card in PCI motherboard's (Scott W. Petersen)



From: Allen Ahoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: INN-2.1 man pages and more INN stuff
Date: 12 Jan 1999 20:55:39 GMT

I installed the inn-2.1.tar.gz file taken from isc.org recently, it
compiled fine, but when make install ran I didn't get the man pages I
thought.
I tried this using Debian LInux 2.0.

Also, I have created my cycbuff files for inn 2.1 using
dd if=/dev/zero of=filname bs=1k count=100
I created cycbuff entries for each buff
I created metacycbuff entries for 2 metabuffs splitting the cycbuffs in
half.

I got to the point where inncheck didn't complain, and then ran 
makehistory -i
it tells me there is a problem initializing the storage manager,
any thoughts.
I have chowned everything to news;News
chmoded files appropriately to 664
made srue /usr/local/news/bin was in the path
pointed patharticles to /home/buffs
set the storageapi to yes and tried also true
help!
ISC sells "support" contracts for $21,000 per year.
Heck if I pay that much I'll pay someone to write it myself.



-- 
===
| Announce communications Inc. | voice: 301-731-5786  |
| 5004 West Lanham Dr.  |email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Hyattsville, MD 20784 |http:  www.announce.com  |
==

--

From: John Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: PPP/Online with Cwix.com ISP
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:07:27 -0500

You are absolutley right.  MCI2000, now CWIX, does use CHAP authentication.
At least they did when I was a customer 6 months ago.  I wasted an entire day
wrestling with ppp when I had that account.  I finally gave up and decided to
call MCI and see what type of authentication they were using,.  The first tech
that I spoke to didn't know what PAP or CHAP was, the second one knew they
were using CHAP.  Both gave me a big hassle about not supporting Linux.

The thing was, I wasn't askin for any freagin Linux support! ..just some basic
info about how their RAS servers were setup.  Guess they don't teach that
stuff in tech support school.

Anyway, edit your chap-secrets file and you'll be good to go.  If I remember
correctly, I too was using Ezppp at the time and it worked almost instantly
after I made the corrections.

Good Luck

"Daniel P. Fraga" wrote:

 Draco wrote:

  do probably most ISPs.  When I try to connect through EzPPP in Linux, I
  can't get on.  It never asks for a password or login name.  I have tried
  using the terminal window and it still will not ask for that info. I was
  wondering if anyone knows anything I should do, or should I just get a
  new ISP??

 Maybe your ISP uses PAP or CHAP authentication. Please check my
 page and see if it helps.

 --
 http://members.xoom.com/ilovelinux/


--

From: John Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ppp0 vs ttyyS0 vs cau0
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:39:30 -0500

I've been fighting with a ppp connection (me and every other user on
this board it seems) under RedHat 5.2 for the last few days.  I connect
OK, but then the connection is terribly slow.

Someone suggested that there was a resourcse conflict and they were
absolutlely right.  The Motorola 28.8 internal modem was set to use irq4
and so was serial port 1 with is attached to my mouse.

So I jumpered the modem to IRQ3 and then, using "setserial", changed the
/dev/modem file to IRQ3 and the standard I/O for COM2 (0x2f8 I think).

The problem now is that the modem still seems to be responding to IRQ4.
Under control panel, I went into the modem configuration tool and
selected cau1.  I was thinking that this was the right setting because
I've configured the modem for COM2.

Under the network configuration tool, I set the modem to "ttyS1".
(/modem and cau1 are not available options).

Now when I try to initiate a connection (using kppp), the modem only
responds to cau0 which I know is set to use IRQ4!

So my question here is, what is the relationship, in this scenario,
between ttyS1, cau1 and /dev/modem?  If I use "setserial" to check their
rescources, they're all are using the same settings.  If this 

Linux-Networking Digest #867

1999-01-13 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #867, Volume #9  Wed, 13 Jan 99 08:13:48 EST

Contents:
  Re: NT and Samba problem ("Jonas")
  Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA ("Glenn Davy")
  Re: Lunux questions ("Glenn Davy")
  telnet ("Glenn Davy")
  Re: Asuscom ISDNLink I-IN100-ST-DV (Andreas Hinz)
  Re: routing problem (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Firewall/Routing question (Brian McCauley)
  Re: ip-up problem (Larry Rivera)
  Apache SSL and libdbm (Eric Mosley)
  Re: Apache 1.3.3 - multiple cgi-bin/ dir's without ScriptAlias? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: How to setup routing? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Email server for Linux (Duncan Simpson)
  Re: Does anyone play net Quake2? (jasonvp@@m1ndspr1ng.NOSPAM.com)
  Re: Problem w second NE2000 card (Rob van der Putten)



From: "Jonas" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NT and Samba problem
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:07:29 +0100

I had the same problem and I gave up and dissabled encypted passwords on my
NT mashine and now it works just fine.

/Jonas



--

From: "Glenn Davy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: need better info on settting up SAMBA
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:48:46 +1100

So how far have you got? I'm a bit of the same mind as you but I've got
through a few samba networks.

Forgive me if my references to howtos aren't quite correct as I'm drudging
from memory here:
1) Get NIC going - checkout ethernet how to and NET3
2) Make sure IP's going, can you ping your self?
3) Make sure hosts and  networks file ok.
4) Setup routing table - Of all the crap I've read on routing the linux
howto is by far the one that made the most sense. It even enabled me to get
the novel routing going which the novel manuals couldn't help me get!
5) Make sure other machine(s) is connected etc and runing TCP/IP and you can
ping each other
6) Get samba package. I've only played with 1.18something. I believe 2 is
out now.
7) Compile and install. With NT there are issues relating to encrypted
passwords. Make sure you read the various files that are included with samba
8) Edit /etc/smb.conf and do lots of reading. This file sets up your shares
among many other things
9) run smbd -D and nmbd -D
10) See if NT can see shared resources
I hope I haven't forgotton any stages. You may have to play with the
smbpasswd file/command.
11) Buy a Mac and install Netatalk, just for kicks ;^)

Hope this helps
Glenn



--

From: "Glenn Davy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Lunux questions
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:02:50 +1100

As best I know (and keen for anyone to improve my understanding here)


bin --- binaries (programs/commands) go here
dev -- device files. The 'filename' the sw referes to when
writing to a device e.g.  a Serial port might be ttyS1, master hard drive
hda
boot  ??
etc - Configuration files
home -- your users place on the hard drive, e.g. /home/glenn is
where I would store my shit on your system.
lib ---  I think where library files (equiv to microsofts dll's
live)
lost+found - 
mnt  a convenient place to mount drives eg. mount /dev/fd0
/mnt -tMSDOS may mount a dos formated disk inyour 'A:" drive
proc - This is cool fun. Info re all your processes live here as
does all sorts of revealing info about your system - the kind of things
nortons used to tell us dos users
root  ?
sbin -- Secure binaries. Programs used only by root not any other
users
tmp -- ??
usr -- Software packages available to users generally go here -
I have Apache, Netscape, MySQL, SAMBA off the top of my head
var -- Where things that vary in size regularly go. Spools for
printers and other devices, mail boxes, news like this etc.


Hope this is a start
Glenn



--

From: "Glenn Davy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: telnet
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:04:28 +1100

Can anyone tell me how to change the terminal emulation in telnet? Bottom
line is I need to emulate scoansi on some linux terminal. Any ideas?
Glenn



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Hinz)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Asuscom ISDNLink I-IN100-ST-DV
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:16:53 GMT

On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:47:49 -, Tom Furie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

According to the documentation, the card only works if the driver is
installed as a module, but 'make *config' doesn't allow the option of
loading 'hisax support for Asuscom' as a module.


This is what i have selected:

 M ISDN support
[*] Support audio via ISDN
M HiSax SiemensChipSet driver support
[*] HiSax Support for EURO/DSS1
[*] HiSax Support for ASUSCOM cards
  

Using 

Linux-Networking Digest #868

1999-01-13 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #868, Volume #9  Wed, 13 Jan 99 10:17:21 EST

Contents:
  SIOCADDRT: Operation not supported by device (Stephen Lohning)
  Re: PPP dial-up Script does not end (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Samba: request_oplock_break: no response (Maurice Agavnian)
  Re: HELP with NE2000 ISA problem, RH 5.2 (Winfried Altmann)
  cherche GATED.conf (sebastien maraux)
  ppp: bad fcs frame / RH 5.1 (Marcus Thiessel)
  Re: LANalyzer for Linux? (Harry Barclay)
  NFS problem: mounts but dirs empty! RH v5.1 on both sides ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  SSLeay and certificates (Arthur Jovellas)
  Re: win98 to Linux Networking Problem (E Wanat)
  Re: IP Masquerading Help (Luc Lalonde)
  Re: Does anyone play net Quake2? ("Morgan V.")
  Dynamic IP address with Apache Web server Help (Bekim Abazoski)
  Re: PPP 2.3.5 and BellAtlantic.net (bill davidsen)
  Re: Token ring (Mike)
  Re: ppp and dynamic dns allocation (bill davidsen)
  Re: Dynamic IP address with Apache Web server Help (Isaac)
  Re: PPP  ARP Proxy problems (Wim Meeus)
  Virtual FTP ("Dominik Berner")
  Diskless mini-howto: Where is nfsboot? ("Colin F. Caughie")
  Webserver setup for multiple domains ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PPP, lan, and routing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  http error 403 with ip masq ("Craig Chapman")
  PPP dial-up Script does not end (Kilian Zumwald)



From: Stephen Lohning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SIOCADDRT: Operation not supported by device
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 00:35:46 +1100

I have been trying to install a static route with the following command
on a RH5.1 system and get
the following :
route add 192.168.10.163 192.168.1.169
SIOCADDRT: Operation not supported by device
Does anyone know what it means and how I fix it. Does it mean
Ipforwarding is not enabled ?
Thanks

--

***

Stephen Lohning  * Australia , P.O Box 268 Mt.Waverley
3149
 * email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * ph 61 (0)419506038 Fax 61 3 98883869
***




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP dial-up Script does not end
Date: 13 Jan 1999 07:21:36 -0600

Kilian Zumwald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi
: My pppd dial-up Script does not end! The Script dials my ISP and connects
: successfully. When I look in

snip

: /usr/sbin/pppd lock connect \
:'/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/my_chat_script.chat' \
: $device $pppflags $localip:$remoteip

Try exec /usr/sbin/pppd  ...  $localip:$remoteip 



--
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
 * It _has_ to be */

--

From: Maurice Agavnian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba: request_oplock_break: no response
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 14:26:48 +0100

Mark Johnson wrote:
 
 I'm having an odd problem with Samba.  I have it set up and working great
 with user security.  One logs in and has access that is expected.  Copying
 files from the server is great, very fast.  However, when I copy files
 from a Win98 client to the server, its very slow.  I've noticed that at
 times it will log this message:
 
 1999/01/11 18:24:32 request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock
 break request to pid 411 on port 1029 for dev = 309, inode = 28805
 
 This does not appear to happen every time though, especially with small
 files.  But copying files to the server is VERY slow.  I've looked through
 the FAQs and web with no solutions.  I've messed with OPLOCKS, and
 locking, no good.  As I said before, copying from the Samba server to the
 Windows client is very fast.
 
 Using Redhat 5.2 with samba-1.9.18p10-5.  Very few changes to smb.conf.
 Thanks for any suggestions!


I had a similar problem with oplock on samba 2.0.0-beta5. I think that
it concern only Win95/Win98, not NT4 clients.

The problem disappears if I diseable oplocks in my smb.conf in the
[global] section (oplocks = False). I don't improve the speed of the SMB
server (30% according to docs/Speed.txt), but I want to be sure that my
PC users don't loose their data when they try to save a file to the
samba server... 

You can try to keep oplocks only on read-only shares...

Before that, I was using 1.9.18p7 and never had this problem.

Maurice.

--

From: Winfried Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP with NE2000 ISA problem, RH 5.2
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 21:39:16 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

HiYa Ari,

grep /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/* for that error message! Sounds like a
hardware
problem (?), or replace your network card / cabeling.

Good luck WinFried

Ari Kaihola wrote:

  I recently installed Red Hat Linux 5.2 on my 

Linux-Networking Digest #909

1999-01-17 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #909, Volume #9  Sun, 17 Jan 99 07:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: ppp-2.3.4: CHAP problem (HELP)
  Re: PPP Server Questions ("Charles Stack")
  Re: SOS SOS SOS HELP HELP HELP SOS SOS SOS ("Raymond Doetjes")
  commanche  apache on kernel 2.2.0pre7 (Frank Hale)
  Re: SOS SOS SOS HELP HELP HELP SOS SOS SOS ("Matt Chipman")
  PORT MAPPING ("Matt Chipman")
  Re: IMAP/POP and sendmail question? ("Raymond Doetjes")
  Re: Fetchmail error (messages included). SMTP fail. ("minstrel")
  Re: What Version to get? ("Raymond Doetjes")
  Re: Sendmail misconfigured or not running. ("Raymond Doetjes")
  Re: where does pop3 save messages? ("Raymond Doetjes")
  Re: PPP/SLIP/Null Modem Connection Help (Rob van der Putten)
  Re: Any way to use 2 modem lines not EQL? ("Raymond Doetjes")
  Boot Rom (russell clarke)
  Re: Online with Linux (russell clarke)
  Re: FCS errors: too many? (Satch)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (M. Buchenrieder)
  Re: Connect without hub ("Jan")



From: HELP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ppp-2.3.4: CHAP problem
Date: 17 Jan 1999 10:59:41 GMT

I have solved problem by installing of DES library.
I just wonder how my system could perform login process without DES routine.

Anyway, I appreciate your help.


--

From: "Charles Stack" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP Server Questions
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 12:16:12 -0500

See Josh Gentry's detailed instructions at

http://www.swcp.com/~jgentry/dialin2.html

The only issue that I'm trying to work out is how to assign a specific ppp
interface to a particular serial port/modem (it always seems to use ppp0
regardless of the number of callers).  Anyone with ideas on solving this
problem...your input is MOST welcome.

Charles



--

From: "Raymond Doetjes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SOS SOS SOS HELP HELP HELP SOS SOS SOS
Date: 17 Jan 1999 11:28:14 GMT

You should do a make aboot when your kernels are to big.
Or what is better you should make stuff in modules format. about 40% of the
stuff you put in to your kernel aren't used on a regular basis. So modules
keep the system fast. And when you need any you can invoke a insmod an
done.

Raymond

CRASH [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in artikel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hie there,
 
 I am a newbie to Linux and is having difficulty to
configure
 my Linux to enable networking.
 
 My system is a 166MMX PC installed with Slackware 3.4
 
 I tried to perform the following to eable networking :
 
 1.did "make config" in the /usr/src/linux directoryafter I have su to
 the superuser root.
 
 2.After completing the configuration, proceeded to set the
dependencies
 within the kernel and clean out old object modules by typing "make dep"
then
 "make clean" after the first one has been completed
 
 3.   Next I then compiled the kernel by typing "make zImage"
 
 What bothered me is what I saw in the last few lines of the output at the
 end of the compilation which goes as follows
 
 "Root device is (3,2)
 Boot sector 512 bytes
 Setup is 4336 bytes
 System is 560 KB
 System is too big
 Make [1]:***[zImage] Error 1
 Make [1]:Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.30/arch/i386/boot'
 Make :***[zImage] Error 2 "
 
 4. Install the 'newly compiled kernel' by typing "make
 modules_install" . The output then output was that THE FILE REQUIRED IS
 MISSING. ( something about *.o)
 
 CAN ANYONE GIVE ME A CLUE WHAT IS GOING ON. I BADLY WANT TO USE LINUX AND
 REMOVE WINDOW95 FROM MY SYSTEM.
 
 
 
 
 

--

From: Frank Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: commanche  apache on kernel 2.2.0pre7
Date: 16 Jan 1999 16:23:57 GMT

Anyon have any problems configuring apache with commanche on RH 5.2 with
kernel 2.2.0pre7? I get the following error though it might not be
because of my kernel version. But I have had apache working before.

If I try to configure apache with commanche I cannot save any settings
it will pop up a window and say 

Error: Child process exited abnormally. 

I uninstalled apache and commanche and reinstalled them and I still get
this error. Has anyone seen it before?

-- 
From:  Frank Hale
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
ICQ:   7205161  
Homepage:  http://members.xoom.com/frankhale/  
Jade:  http://jade.netpedia.net/

"Excuse my english I went to a US public school"

--

From: "Matt Chipman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SOS SOS SOS HELP HELP HELP SOS SOS SOS
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 22:27:08 +1100

These are all in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts  dir on my machine


cya
Matt

I am a newbie to Linux and is having difficulty to
configure
my Linux to enable networking.


--snip--

To my surprise, a number of confuiguration files are not
residing in the /etc/ppp directory. They are :

1. 

Linux-Networking Digest #911

1999-01-17 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #911, Volume #9  Sun, 17 Jan 99 10:13:26 EST

Contents:
  The traceroute multiple interfaces bug (was: Need TCP/IP routing guru assistance) 
(Brian McCauley)
  DNS and isdn help (David Heinzinger)
  Re: [Q] : DNS problem ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: hostname killed eth0 ! (Sai Manohar Gopisetty)
  Re: Cannot login to samba server ("William  Carol Koscielniak")
  Re: fake an internet connection from win98 box to linux box? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: PPP Server Questions (Brian McCauley)
  Re: securing a linux box (Ivo Naninck)
  Re: DNS, Named 4.1, Named 8.2 ("greyman")
  Re: PAP/manual Login? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: DNS works, but get 'no route to host' for everything. (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Hostname changes after PPP connection (Brian McCauley)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(George Marengo)
  Re: Mail and DNS servers ("greyman")
  Re: Samba win95/98 over the internet ("greyman")
  Re: Incompatibility with header files net/if.h and linux/netdevice.h (Andreas Jaeger)
  PAP/manual login?? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  AutoPPP and pppd server (Alan Baker)
  Re: Very tough PPP problem (LCP timeouts) (Clifford Kite)



From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The traceroute multiple interfaces bug (was: Need TCP/IP routing guru 
assistance)
Date: 17 Jan 1999 12:50:00 +

root [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  This is a well known bug in traceroute.  Use -s 0.0.0.0 to suppress
  this bug. 
 
   Not actually a `bug'.

Oh come off it.  This is a bug.  Some bugs you can call "features" but
this is definitely a bug.

 There is the option -i to select the interface
 you want to traceroute from, e.g. traceroute -i eth0 www.netscape.com etc.

I know there is such an option.  In the absense of a '-i' option the
correct behaviour would be for traceroute not to select an interface.
The current version picks one at random.  Actually it's not random -
it is deterministic, but the fact remains that traceroute selecting an
interface when I did not ask it to do so is a bug.

   Your -s 0.0.0.0 solution is valid for unixes which don't offer the -i
 option. 

And also for ones that do.  It may be more keystokes than "-i eth0"
or "-i ppp0" but it has the advantage that you can simply alias
traceroute to "traceroute -s 0.0.0.0" and not have to worry about it
again.

-- 
 \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from| Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\/~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\   ~   ~ ~~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

--

From: David Heinzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS and isdn help
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 14:28:04 -0600


I have a 3com impactiq ta (external).  I can connect only on one b
channel.  If I try a multilink connection I can connect, but I can't
ping a name (ping cnn.com).  When only one b channel is operating I can
ping.  Even more weird, if I use multilink and then ping it will do
nothing... until I pick up a line (and the dynamic bandwidth function
drops a B channel {one for data one for voice}) it suddenly pings.
Then as soon as I hang up the line and Multilink re-establishes the
second B channel the pinging stops.  Any ideas?  I am stumped.  When
checking my kernel for isdn support it was of course there.  In one of
the help blurbs I saw something about ipppd  Cant find any other
reference to it.



--
Dave.



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Q] : DNS problem ?
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:34:47 GMT



   Hey all !

   I'm having a problem which fix should be easy but as I am new to linux...
 and I couldn't  find any clear reference to it in the docs... So here's : I
 did setup my PPP connection with the KDE dial-up utility or whatever it's
 called. I get connected, I can tell this because a window "connected" with
 connection time shows up. But now, whatever networking utility I load
 (tried ftp, telnet, cftp, netscape, pine, kde specific stuff...) , when I
 try to reach a distant computer I always get an error message telling me
 that the host does not exist. So I guess it's a DNS config problem, right ?
 I checked the DNS names, they are correct (my provider's), and I know these
 DO work because I used to use them when I had Winwhatever_you_call_it.

   Any clue for helping me getting online would be GREATLy appreciated...

 Thanks for ya time
 --
 Djaak

 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]


this sounds similare  to my problem, I ran ifconfig, and it showed I was
connected to ppp with an ip address assigned and I can ping any IP address,
but I cant ping a name like www.ibm.com when I could before. I used to be

Linux-Networking Digest #912

1999-01-17 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #912, Volume #9  Sun, 17 Jan 99 14:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: FTP for users ("greyman")
  Re: Associating interfaces pppX with ttySx (Brian McCauley)
  Re: HELP: Setting up a DIAL-IN PPP SERVER on my Linux box?? (Tim Sailer)
  Fritz!/BT Speedway PPP over ISDN (Alistair Hamilton)
  Re: UUCP over TCP - no echo? (Denis BRAUSSEN)
  Re: 3com Megahertz 10/100 LAN CardBus PC Card ? (J. Scott Berg)
  Re: ip-masquerading ("waxhead")
  Re: AutoPPP and pppd server (Josh Gentry)
  Re: Connect without hub ("Guy A. Wadsworth")
  Re: Newbie Proxy Server Problem (Peter Woytiuk)
  PPP configuration problem (Jeremy Mullins)
  Re: BellAtlantic.net and PPP 2.3.5 (Frank Hale)
  Win98 home dir on linux box ("Johnny P.")
  Re: Cyrus 1.5.19 compile error on RH 5.2 (Ulrich Teichert)
  Re: IPX PrinterServer and RH 5.1 (Frank Ranner)



From: "greyman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTP for users
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 00:33:54 +1000

G'day Phil,

You need to make these users "guest" class users. Here's how:

The crux of the matter is the class of ftp user. In wu-ftp, there are three
classes of user:
- Real User
- Guest User
- Anonymous User

When the real user (default) logs in, they do not get chrooted( ).
When a guest user logs in, they get chrooted( ) to their home directory as
defined in the /etc/passwd file
When an anonymous user attaches, they get chrooted( ) to the ftp daemon's
home directory.

To get an ordinary user to be a guest, you need to put them into a
/etc/group as, say, 'ftpusers'. Like so:
ftpusers::101:nigel,gmcs,ann

They have an entry in /etc/passwd like:
ann:x:511:101::/home/ann:/bin/ftponly
(x...) is replaced by their encrypted passord if not using shadow
passwords. Note the group they belong to.

Then, in /etc/ftpaccess, put stuff like:

class   all   real,guest,anonymous  *
# root is aliased to an admin mailbox by the mail program
email root@localhost

loginfails 5

# The only thing a guest user can't do is chmod
compressyes all
tar yes all
chmod  no  guest,anonymous
delete   no  anonymous
overwrite  no  anonymous
rename no  anonymous
# Log all transfers
log transfers anonymous,guest,real inbound,outbound
# This line determines what group is the guest group
guestgroup ftpusers
# You can specify global filespecs to leave alone
noretrieve .qmail .*
# You can also restrict upload to only the home/username/public_html
directory
upload /home/* / no
upload /home/* /bin no
upload /home/* /bin/* no
upload /home/* /etc no
upload /home/* /etc/* no
upload /home/* /lib no
upload /home/* /lib/* no
upload /home/* /public_html yes

Restart inetd and it should work with the 'home' directory as the users root
directory.
Greyman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Phil Massyn wrote in message 01be3fe7$738ba740$0401a8c0@bigboy...
Hi all,

I'm running WU-FTP 2.4.2 and I would like to setup a system where I can
have users FTP into the system and only have access to the directory I've
given them access to.  Right now, my users can see the whole file system,
and I don't want it this way.

Any help will be much appreciated.

Phil Massyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Associating interfaces pppX with ttySx
Date: 17 Jan 1999 13:43:34 +

"Charles Stack" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm working on a dialin server.  As it stands right now, regardless of which
 modem receives the call, it is assigned ppp0.

No, pppd assignes the lowest available number.  If there are no active
connections this will always be 0.

  Naturally, this will cause a
 conflict should I have two or more calls at the same time.

No it won't.

  What I'd like to do is have ttySx assigned to pppX when the call
 comes in.  Can someone tell me how I can do this?

AFIAK you can't.  The developers of pppd seem to resist requests for
this functionality to be added.

  It is possible to create/destroy ppp interfaces at run time?

Yes.  This is the default behaviour on recent kernels.  (Can't recall
when it changed, 1.3.x I think).

  If so, how?

Use pppd.

-- 
 \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from| Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\/~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\   ~   ~ ~~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

--

From: Tim Sailer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,alt.linux
Subject: Re: HELP: Setting up a DIAL-IN PPP SERVER on my Linux box??
Date: 17 Jan 1999 00:11:54 GMT

In 

Linux-Networking Digest #923

1999-01-18 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #923, Volume #9  Mon, 18 Jan 99 12:13:41 EST

Contents:
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(Rick Moen)
  Re: Delegating DNS resolving? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Really weird samba problem (Anton Dischner)
  Linux mit 128k Standleitung (Per Casten)
  Re: ip-up problem (Larry Rivera)
  weird telnet problems (SinGin)
  Problems loading lance.c driver module! ("tbx... thomas")
  Re: inetd (Peter W)
  Re: realy needs (Peter W)
  Re: Hubs (Mogens Kjaer)
  Re: executing programs on nfs? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: very small problem with cacheing nameserver (Rodney Hendricks)
  Re: Questions about NAMED at STARTUP (Rodney Hendricks)
  Re: Setting up RH 5.2 for ip_forwarding (Rodney Hendricks)
  Re: Best place for... (Rodney Hendricks)
  Re: PPP logging frames! Why? (Clifford Kite)
  Finger info, hostname ("Perus")
  Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups (Thorsten Kukuk)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(Gert Wollny)
  Re: Fax Server under Linux? (Kristofer Pettijohn)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (mlw)
  ½Ð°ÝRH5.2¤ä´©­þ¨Ç¼tµPªºNetwork card? ("ronsu")
  Re: Authentication w/PAP??? ("Daniel P. Fraga")



From: Rick Moen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND 
idiot-friendly?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 08:21:20 GMT

[Followups set]
In comp.os.linux.setup MalkContent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

: So Far, here, as with so many other posts on relative M$ Vs. Linux,
: I've seen all sorts of bitching, moaning, and crying
[huge amounts of drivel deleted]

Fuckhead.  
Get this shit out of the technical newsgroups.

-- 
Cheers,   The cynics among us might say:   "We laugh, 
Rick Moen monkeyboys -- Linux IS the mainstream UNIX now!
rick (at) linuxmafia.com  MuaHaHaHa!" but that would be rude. -- Jim Dennis

--

From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Delegating DNS resolving?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 12:17:53 +

Daniel Burr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi all.  I'm rather new to the world of DNS, so I'd thought I'd ask the
 world:
 
 I heard that it is possible to "delegate" DNS resolving, ie:
 registering an IP with the ISP in such a way that your server may run
 many subdomains on the same IP.
 For example:
 
 foo.bar is my domain
 grand is my server
 
 grand.foo.bar is registered as 203.3.45.9
 
 I want to set up many apache virtual servers (easy enough to do):
 orange, apple, pear, but all to the same IP.  But I want to only have to
 change something on my computer each time a server goes up or down, but
 nothing on the ISP's computer.
 
 Do I use 'named' to handle this type of situation?

Yes, no problem.  Just do it - it's all well documented.

Be aware that the DNS system is a distributed cache system, changes
take a finite time to propagate.  You can set low TTLs but this is
antisocial.

-- 
 \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from| Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\/~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\   ~   ~ ~~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anton Dischner)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Really weird samba problem
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:52:06 +0100

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Sandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have a share mounted on another Linux machine which contains Tcl/Tk
 programs.  We'll call my machine A and the mounted machine B.  Often,
 when I make changes in tcl files on B, when I run them on A, I get
 errors about missing close brackets.  But when I run the same program on
 A, it works fine.  I'm not sure, but running ntpdate on A (syncing my
 clock with internet time) seems to help.  Originally the two machines
 had been about 20 minutes off, but I still had the problem when they
 were only a few seconds off.  Also, smbumounting and smbmounting again
 fixes it as well.
 
 This is really weird, and makes for an unstable environment.  Anyone
 know what to do about it?
 
 Thanks,
 - Ben
 
 PS. I am running standard installs of RedHat 5.1 on both machines (samba
 version is samba-1.9.18p5-1).
 PPS. Please Cc: to email. thanks

Hi Ben,

maybe you want to upgrade to brandnew Samba 2.0. I doubt it fixes your
problem but it's worth upgrading anyway.

Kind regards,

Toni

--

From: Per Casten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux mit 128k Standleitung
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:06:04 +0100

Frage:

Hat Jemand Erfahrungen mit einer ISDN Standleitung (D64S2, also 128k)
und Linux (Suse 5.3 oder Suse 6.0) 

Linux-Networking Digest #924

1999-01-18 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #924, Volume #9  Mon, 18 Jan 99 15:13:55 EST

Contents:
  Update, Revenge of NT (Jason A Fletcher)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (mumford)
  WEB search engine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (Joerg Klaas)
  Which processes listen on which ports ? (Joerg Klaas)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (John Girash)
  module net-pf-4 errors (Luca Colombi)
  delays when using dns (Serial # 0)
  Re: Routing problems ... (Chris)
  diald/ppp problems ("Tim Underwood")
  Re: What is pppd doing to my poor modem? ("Stu")
  Re: Configuring PPP server for IPX ("Stu")
  Local networking between Linux machines ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: dhcpd problems - would appreciate your insight (Chris)
  Re: Samba Troubles (Benjohn007)
  FTP slowing down PPP (Jerome De Greef)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(Stephen R. Savitzky)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Daryle Niedermayer)
  Re: Need help with diagnosing a network problem ("Jay D Ribak")



From: Jason A Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Update, Revenge of NT
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:08:34 -0500

 Thanks already for the suggestions I've gotten on this forum!

Update: I have an Aha! (maybe.) First, re L J Bayuk's advice I tried
pinging and telnetting via IP addresses. I could do that on my machine but
no others (not even the UNIX sitting on my desk.)  Thus, it looks like my
loopback IP is all right and perhaps my outgoing configurations, but I
still have no network access.

Re Paul's advice (I haven't tried SuprMath's advice yet), I checked the
hardware settings with ifconfig. My hardware settings were fine; I wasn't
getting nailed with the notorious  problem this time. (I unplugged,
waited, and rebooted anyway to make sure.) Now for the Aha: after trying to
ping out to Yahoo and getting no reply, I checked the LEDs on the card.
NONE were lit!!

This changes the problem a little bit.  Conceivably, I suppose, my hardware
(card or cable) might have been damaged in the uninstall/reinstall (again,
revenge of NT). Or, perhaps the power resource management isn't sending
juice to the card. Or maybe the driver is old or bad or corrupted and
simply cannot recognize it. Or perhaps there is a little demon gleefully
cackling and rubbing his hands together in delight as he scrambles my card.
I'm not ruling anything out at this point.

Any ideas? Do any of the above sound plausible? Do you know of something
else that might cause/fix this? I'd love to hear responses; until then, I
think I will do a little research into how to recompile a kernel...

Thanks,

Jason Fletcher



--

Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mumford)
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 17:26:41 GMT

A while ago, Bill Unruh[EMAIL PROTECTED] begot:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder) writes:
and manually edit the /etc/passwd file to have an entry with an empty
password string and no corresponding entry in /etc/shadow, then you'll
always be able to login without password. Try it. Add a user manually
and login. I just tested it on a SuSE 5.3 system, using login.c v. 1.4 .
Using an FTP account to actually access the system is just a way to hide
the intruder(s) from the eyes of the sysadmin. But the damage is already
done.

His comment is that while login does not allow a remote root login with no
password, ftp does allow a root login with no password. This is what he
is calling the bug in ftpd.  It certainly is an inconsistancy between
the two.

It is also true that this bug is minor compared to the bug which allowed
a root user to be entered into passwd without a password.

In a way it is an inconsistancy, but in another way it isn't.  The linux
login program has been hacked (if you will) to pay attention to a file
called /etc/securetty (may vary from dstrib to distrib).  Wu-ftpd could
not care less about this file, since ftp doesn't open a tty.

It's not a bug, it's a feature. :)

-- 
Glenn Lamb - [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Finger for my PGP Key.
Email to me must have my address in either the To: or Cc: field.  All other
mail will be bounced automatically as spam.
PGPprint = E3 0F DE CC 94 72 D1 1A  2D 2E A9 08 6B A0 CD 82

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WEB search engine
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:25:34 GMT

Hi,

Does somebody know if there is a WEB search engine for LINUX?

We are now using a WEB search engine on M$-NT 4.0 for indexing all sites
referring to one country, El Salvador. Because of the software prices we
are looking for an alternative...

Thanks for any hints,

Ernesto

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, 

Linux-Networking Digest #927

1999-01-18 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #927, Volume #9  Mon, 18 Jan 99 22:13:55 EST

Contents:
  Re: Cable modem and IP Masquerading (Don O'Connell)
  Re: After IFCONFIG, What?
  Re: How do you run slip/ppp between two machines? (Vaughan R. Pratt)
  Re: my own server (Ben Sandler)
  Re: Tricky network problem (using loopback?) (Sam Clayton)
  Re: getting the remote IP address in a telnet session (John Auld)
  Re: Importing NT user database (Peter W)
  Re: linux - windows - internet (Eugene)
  DCHP transfer through Linux (Hans Somers)
  PPP disconnect ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Three questions (or take it easy on the newbie). (Darren Greer)
  Re: A little newbie help... seeing Win95 shares in Linux (Ben Sandler)
  Netbios routing over two segments (Freerk Jongsma)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Jacques Distler)
  Re: Benchmark Software ("Tommi Mäkitalo")
  Re: Three questions (or take it easy on the newbie). ("minstrel")
  Re: Newbie with Connection Problems (Digital Wokan)
  Re: getting the remote IP address in a telnet session (Josh Rusko)
  my own server (Maat)
  Re: 3c503 and Linux / Win95 networking trouble ("Kyle Bowerman")
  Re: dhcpd problems - would appreciate your insight (Daddy Rabbit)
  Linux Server + Win 9x Clients - Security??? ("Andrew C. Ohnstad")
  Re: inetd (Loren Brookes)
  Simple networking questions (Rob)
  Re: modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!! (Hendra Susanto)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don O'Connell)
Subject: Re: Cable modem and IP Masquerading
Reply-To: donroc @ home . net
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:02:04 GMT

On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 02:16:39 GMT, Scott W. Petesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999 01:32:04 -0600, "Fly" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Here is the suggested way and it works for us:

linux masq server should have 2 ethernet cards, one connected to the
hub (internal network) and the other connected to the cable modem.

Read the following how to's on cable modem and dhcpcd (dhcpcd will
asign an ipaddress to the network card connected to the cable modem)

BTW, works great but just a little concerned about security and being
connected %100 of the time.

Scott


Use ipfwadm/ipmasqadm to set up your rules and
use the tcp-wrappers programs. It's been keeping my system secure


Right now I'm using an ethernet card and modem in my Win98 machine to use a
cable modem. It looks like they use the regular modem for upstream and the
ethernet card for downstream.

How can I setup IP masquerading to use one or two more PC's? I've got an old
486 in the basement I could probably use as the firewall.

Any ideas?

Would I set the IP of this 486 to 192.168.1.1 or do I use the IP address the
cable company gave me for the ethernet card in my PC? It looks like the
cable modem itself has its own IP address. It looks like the PPP connection
is also given this same IP address. The ethernet card in my PC is assigned a
second IP address.





Scott W. Petersen - N9SLA
Web Page:  www.wwa.com/~scooter
Elgin, IL - USA
ICQ 8287204
Packet E-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


PLEASE note e-mail address is scooter @ wwa.com


-- 

Don O'Connell -- email  - donroc @ home . net

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: After IFCONFIG, What?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 20:38:04 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T.L. (Terry) Branscombe) writes:
My NE2000-clone has recently become undetectable by Linux.  I suspect I
accidently deleted a file required by the INIT process, but which one?

The boot time messages have disappeared, so that now, the section headed
" installing net devices " is completely blank.  Also, just after
the /proc filesystem is loaded, I receive messages similar to:

   SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
   SIOCSIBADDR: No such device
   ...

It used to
tell me that the IRQ and BASEADDR of the NIC.

I have tried the following boot parameters:

   linux ether=0,0,eth0
   linux ether=12,300,eth0

and tried ifconfig with the IP address of my machine from the hosts file:

   ifconfig eth0 192.168.110.1 up
   and received:
   SIOCSIFADDR: No such device

Can anyone suggest some checks I should make?  Thanks.
--
It sounds as if you do not have the driver in your kernel. Is your
kernel new?
+--+
Terrence  Branscombe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vaughan R. Pratt)
Subject: Re: How do you run slip/ppp between two machines?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 19:51:42 GMT

In article 77unim$q2o$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Vaughan R. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install a slip or ppp connection between two RH 5.2 boxes
connected by a short serial cable. 
[...]
So, is there any straightforward way under RH 5.2 of running slip or
ppp across a short cable, [...]

Meanwhile I figured out the straightforward way: as root, 

Linux-Networking Digest #935

1999-01-19 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #935, Volume #9  Tue, 19 Jan 99 08:14:15 EST

Contents:
  Errors compiling portmap - please help (Vincent Stemen)
  Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (e-account)
  Linux networking weirdness ? daemons rejecting ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Samba Troubles (Benjohn007)
  Re: linux time configuration (Peter Farmer)
  Re: lpd won't accept print jobs from other machines (Scott Field)
  Re: ppp numbering--control? (Brian McCauley)
  Re: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ? (Lei Miao)
  smbmount seg faults on RH 5.2 (Ole Jacob Taraldset)
  Can I force a route? (Jonathan Johnson)
  Re: How to set up a DNS ?? (Omegaman)
  Re: OH My God  (Omegaman)
  Re: ip masquerading and icq ("Rogers News")
  Re: begginer need help please (Marius Bezuidenhout)
  Re: ½Ð°ÝRH5.2¤ä´©­þ¨Ç¼tµPªºNetwork card? ("Darryl Burling")
  Re: database suggestions, please? ("Glenn Davy")
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (John Girash)



From: Vincent Stemen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Errors compiling portmap - please help
Date: 18 Jan 1999 00:59:57 -0700


Is there anybody here who has had experience compiling portmap under
Linux?  I have tried compiling portmap_4 and portmap_5beta and get
similar results.  Here is the output of make for portmap_5beta.

===
cc -Dconst= -Dperror=xperror -DHOSTS_ACCESS -DCHECK_PORT  -DFACILITY=LOG_MAIL  o
portmap.c: In function `xperror':
portmap.c:299: argument `what' doesn't match prototype
/usr/include/stdio.h:134: prototype declaration
portmap.c: In function `reg_service':
portmap.c:353: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:362: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:362: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:404: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:416: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:416: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:450: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:462: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:462: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:477: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c:489: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:501: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
portmap.c: In function `callit':
portmap.c:648: warning: passing arg 2 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:648: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:678: warning: passing arg 3 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:678: warning: passing arg 5 from incompatible pointer type
portmap.c:679: warning: passing arg 2 of `svc_sendreply' from incompatible poine
make: *** [portmap.o] Error 1
===

I am running
kernel 2.0.35
libc-5.4.23
gcc-2.7.2.3

Any help will be appreciated.

Thanks.

-- 
---
Vincent Stemen[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Try Linux!  The operating system of choice for those who are tired of
trying to perform real tasks with toy operating systems,
or operating systems that have been stripped of
functionality just so they can charge you to put it back
in.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:39:12 GMT




  Hi,

 Thorsten, I forgot to add that the netgroups we work with
are very large, we have hierarchical netgroups, of 17,000 users.

--Ariel


P.S. Nevertheless, it works fine on Solaris, Irix, NetApp filer.

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: e-account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.questions
Subject: running smtp server and pop3 server on same machine ?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:07:37 +0100

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==AEE7E47C8E928F0918BC0A57
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hello,

Is it possible to run both smtp and pop3 servers on the same machine?
If so, are they able to transfer mail from the one to the other?
We seem to have some problem to implement it.

Feel free to comment.

Thanks



==AEE7E47C8E928F0918BC0A57
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="e-account.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for e-account
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="e-account.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Cant;Bart
tel;home:+32 16 23.71.56
tel;work:+32 2 714.45.63
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.ficsgrp.com
org:FICS Group NV
adr:;;Excelsiorlaan 80;Zaventem;;1900;Belgium
version:2.1

Linux-Networking Digest #937

1999-01-19 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #937, Volume #9  Tue, 19 Jan 99 09:14:00 EST

Contents:
  Re: What is pppd doing to my poor modem? (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Slower ppp connect time with Linux than with  Windows95? (Allan Olesen)
  Re: Pentium with CD - 486 without (Peter Flinkfelt)
  DCHP transfer through Linux (Hans Somers)
  PPP disconnect ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: forwarding, masquerading, firewalling?? (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: HELP: virtual hosting, mail, pop3 (Erich Titl)
  Re: Importing NT user database (Peter W)
  Re: Changing passwords in Samba (Josh Rusko)
  Re: Mount WIN9x drive across LAN (Frank Hahn)
  Re: inetd (Loren Brookes)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Frank Sweetser)
  2.2.0-pre7, ppp, telnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Help: sendmail hanging-up boot-up ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Why hangs the modem ? (Francesc Guasch)
  DNS Again.. (Jordy Leduc)
  COM1 PCMCIA Card (Andreas Reuter)
  Re: Sending a file to a remote machine's port (Elchonon Edelson)
  PPP and Diald ("Bruce Taber")
  Debian and netbase start/stop problems (Ruud van den Brink)
  tar to remote ftape (Charles E Cook)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: What is pppd doing to my poor modem?
Date: 18 Jan 1999 13:50:04 -0600

Stu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Did you just plug the new modem and and things worked without any Linux
: configuration changes?  If so then check such things as

: Yea, My modem init string is ATF1 I like to keep it simple. I'm sure
: there's an AT command for it, and I was hoping if I knew what Linux was
: doing at time of error, I could figure out what the appropriate AT command
: string would be. Is it flow control? is it timing? I have no idea.

Try adding K3 to the modem initialization string unless you are sure that
it's in the factory profile for the modem with fcs errors.  This enables
RTS/CTS flow control.  ATV in minicom will show the profiles.

: Modem AT command set profile not configured for hardware flow control
: 
: Mismatched UART for modem speed capability
: How do I check this/ what does that mean?

It means that the UART your modem uses needs to be at capabable of keeping
up with the modem speed.  For a 28.8+ modem you need a 16550A UART and
an older 16450 with just a 1 byte internal buffer likely won't cut it.
In turn the 16550A is really not fast enough for a 128k ISDN connection.

: Bad cable/connector/connection
: That I had checked.
: Thanks for your information and ideas, I'll keep looking, but if you have
: any more tips, I'd appreciate.

The other things I know about that might contribute to fcs error are the
absence of the pppd crtscts option, the absence of the asycnmap option
in certain cases, and (maybe) the presence of the "escape xx" option
in others.  These don't seem to fit your circumstances, where a plug-in
replacement modem cures the problem.



--
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allan Olesen)
Subject: Re: Slower ppp connect time with Linux than with  Windows95?
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:34:35 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ville Nummela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't think so.. It's much more likely that it's all due the way ppp is
configured. Linux is probably configured to enter account names and
passwords and stuff, and W95 just starts ppp as soons as it gets
connected. With slow-as-hell -servers like the ISPs in Finland use the
difference can be over 10 seconds. Quick test with one of them showed that
if I configure my pppd to start right after "CONNECT" it has a working ppp
connection in about 2 seconds, and if I have chat entering my account name
and password and commands to start ppp on the server side it takes 5-20
seconds. So the magic "trick" is to use the ua-option of pppd.. 

I use PAP under Linux as well as under Windows, so that should not
give any differences. It seems that most of the time is used for
preparing the modem for dialing, which comes prior to "CONNECT".

BTW:
I did a test with IpRoute under dos - 0.9 seconds. That feels fast.


-- 
Allan Olesen

"Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue."

--

From: Peter Flinkfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentium with CD - 486 without
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 00:22:33 GMT

I have researched this myself for a Laptop, but the floppy drive
recently shit the bed. I did find that FreeBSD has a how-to type
document specically on this type of install. Check it out.

peter

Mikhail Bovineck wrote:
 
 Yes, but where is the fun in that?  Besides, it causes warranty
 problems on the Pentium sigh.
 
 On Thu, 14 Jan 1999 23:21:59 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I am an extreme newbie to Linux, but couldn't you temporarily put the
 cd rom from the Pentium box in the 486(unless its scsi and the 486 has no scsi
 adapter)? Then copy the cd to hardisk?
 Ffej
 
  Hi 

Linux-Networking Digest #940

1999-01-19 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #940, Volume #9  Tue, 19 Jan 99 15:13:51 EST

Contents:
  Re: Setting up PPP ("Olly Segwick")
  Re: Win95 to Linux! (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Why hangs the modem ? (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (John Coffman)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: smaba  win98 (Lonny Schwartz)
  Re: Linux Networking (Kelvin Leung)
  Re: nt cannot browse network (samba) (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Two IP addresses to the same Ethernet card (Rolf Raar)
  Re: IP-masquerading with IPCHAINS--NEED HELP!!! (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Tricky network problem (using loopback?) (Sam Clayton)
  Call for Papers ("Linux IA")
  Re: Recomendation for external modem for Linux? (Joe Halpin)
  URGEND: PLIP problems... (Maik Hassel)
  Re: onboard DSP winmodem? ("Simon Allfrey")
  Re: Problems with DISPLAY (John Strange)



From: "Olly Segwick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Setting up PPP
Date: 19 Jan 1999 15:04:22 GMT

What about running 

route

and seeing if the default routes have been added?  pppsetup does that for
you, or at least it should.  I've used it numerous times and had few
problems.  If you run it from the console on your box, it should popup the
Ip address given to it by your Isp after 30 seconds or so.  If it doesn't,
then try not using PAP and other ways.  Can you dial in just fine using
Minicom?


-- 
Olly Segwick


Terry Voakes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article
01be4367$c77b6d80$1a381cd0@terry-voakes...
 Hello,
 
 I have tried setting up PPP using the pppsetup program that comes with
 Slackware 3.6 but no luck.  I have all the information from my ISP and I
am
 sure that it is correct.  (i.e. name server, PAP, etc...)
 
 I checked the syslogd file and it definitely seems that the PPP
connection
 is forming (i.e. says "CONNECT - got it." as the documentation states it
 should).  However, when I try to ping the name servers specified in the
 /etc/resolv.conf file, no luck.  I have read the PPP-HOWTO but still
could
 not get it working.
 
 I would greatly appreciate any help if anyone has any suggestions or
 comments.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Terry
 

--

From: Raymond Doetjes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win95 to Linux!
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:10:47 +0100

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==500BC22FD022A9C74F726A47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

What is your Linux ip address???
I Guess 192.168.0.1 please verify.

Raymond

Greg - Web Development wrote:

 Hello all:

 I'm having trouble networking my Win95 to my Linux server. I can't ping
 the Linux box and Linux can't ping Win95.

 Win95 Control Panel Network settings:

 gateway 192.168.0.1
 win95 ip192.168.0.10
 subnet  255.255.255.0

 Linux /etc/hosts:

 127.0.0.1   localhost
 192.168.0.10win95

 Can anyone tell me if and what I'm missing? I really appreciate it.

 Thank you!

 Sincerely,

 Gregory A. Smith
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



==500BC22FD022A9C74F726A47
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Raymond Doetjes
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"

begin:  vcard
fn: Raymond Doetjes
n:  Doetjes;Raymond
org:SYNAPSES IT
adr:Overijsselhaven 47;;;Nieuwegein;Utrecht;3433 PH;The Netherlands
email;internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:  programmeur VAB
tel;work:   030 6066411
tel;fax:030 6067871
x-mozilla-cpt:  ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


==500BC22FD022A9C74F726A47==


--

From: Raymond Doetjes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why hangs the modem ?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:14:38 +0100

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==6DD5B72702964B69F567
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I could imagine that you still have the +++ rule in your modem to go
back to command mode.
The +++ is a normal ocurrence in PPP sessions.

Raymond



Francesc Guasch wrote:

 I have ppp-2.3.5. I have a script that launches the ppp
 connection.
 I have tried to add the idle option like this in the
 /usr/sbin/ppp-go file.

 My problem is that the modem hangs very soon, in the
 very begining of the connection, reading or sending
 mail it stops.

 How can I know if is my modem that hangs or the one
 in the other side ?

 Is the idle option safe ?

 --
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.etsetb.upc.es/~frankie
  ^-^.-,
  o o _ ) Errors, like straws, upon the surface flow;
   Y (_, (__(Ssss He who would search for pearls must dive below.



==6DD5B72702964B69F567
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; 

Linux-Networking Digest #944

1999-01-19 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #944, Volume #9  Tue, 19 Jan 99 23:14:09 EST

Contents:
  Re: Local DNS (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem (Clifford Kite)
  Disk size req'd for Linux cable modem server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Sunforum/NetMeeting compatible software? (Steve Wampler)
  Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing? (Edward Vigmond)
  [Hylafax] WYSIWIG fax cover sheet generation? ("Der Ubermensch")
  Re: WEB search engine ("Olly Segwick")
  IP Accounting with IPCHAINS ("Scott Brause")
  Re: Samba Troubles (Darren Greer)
  Re: slow telnet login in my home-LAN (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Can't telnet to IMAP daemon's ports ("Olly Segwick")
  Re: Setting up RH 5.2 for ip_forwarding (lcs Mixmaster Remailer)
  Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP (Matt Kressel)
  Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (j)
  Re: securing a linux box (Yan Seiner)
  Linux to Win95 Null-Modem Connection (jymohqes)
  Re: Can I force a route? (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Faxserver for winblows client ("Kurt C. Anderson")
  Re: IP-masquerading with IPCHAINS--NEED HELP!!! (Malware)
  Where's mountd  nfsd (RedHat 5.2) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Darren Greer)
  Re: smaba  win98 (Matt Kressel)



From: Matt Kressel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Local DNS
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:35:24 GMT

Olly Segwick wrote:
 
 I've got a Redhat Linux 5.2 server with several Windows and Linux clients.
 The Linux server is connected to the Internet through a modem and the
 clients connect to the Internet through IP masquerading.  I want the
 clients to pretend the server is the company's actual email server, ie,
 companyname.com.  So they send and receive all email from it, and it sends
 and receives to and from the Internet, and doesn't just act as a router.
 I'd like to also setup a DNS so when *real* dns requests go to the server,
 it goes to the Internet and gets the actual address, EXCEPT for
 companyname.com, which I'd like it to intercept and say "oh it's this".
 Yet companyname.com actually exists out on the Internet somewhere else.
 Then the clients can pickup their mail from companyname.com whether their
 computers (and laptops) are connected internally or elsewhere.
 
 So where should I begin looking?  I'd like to maybe start with the DNS
 setup.


For DNS: http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/DNS-HOWTO.html
I've done this already and it works very well. It speeds up net access
as well since frequently used sites are looked up internally very
quickly.

For the mail stuff you should use POP mail (see inetd) and fetchmail.

Fetchmail will retrieve mail from the Internet and the POP server will
let your clients access it from your machine.  Note that this introduces
some new risks.  Since the server will have to poll the Internet for
mail, someone may snoop the passwords knowing when you do this.  Sending
mail is no problem.  If you allow it to relay (see "man sendmail", then
search for relay) then you canjust specify the Linux box as the clients
SMTP mail host.

-Matt

-- 
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-  Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY -+
+-  TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 +

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem
Date: 19 Jan 1999 14:38:42 -0600

Simon Allfrey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Anyone had any success with the

: Multiwave Commwave 56 PCI winmodem

This modem is listed as a variety of winmodem at

http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html


--
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Disk size req'd for Linux cable modem server
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:53:49 GMT

I am a newbie that want to setup a Linux box. It will serve mainly as cable
modem server/firewall but I would also like to tinker with Linux apps.
I want X, and be able to play with Star Office and compiling tools. I may also
want to have this linux box serve as print server for two other windoze pc.

What size of hard drive would I need / would you recommend?
The machine is a P200MMX with 32MB RAM

Thanks,

Rudy

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: Steve Wampler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sunforum/NetMeeting compatible software?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:15:04 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Does anyone know of Linux software that implements the
conferencing system standards supported by SunForum
and NetMeeting.  I particularly interested in the
sharing/collaborating aspects and whiteboarding.

Thanks!
-- 

Linux-Networking Digest #946

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #946, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 02:13:44 EST

Contents:
  Re: Connect without hub (Paul Gress)
  Firewall and IPSec ("Leo Stutzmann")
  HELP: 3Com 3C900B-TPO NIC (Jeff Barriault)
  Re: Linux to Win95 Null-Modem Connection (Peter W)
  Acer NIC ("Jim Ray")
  Re: 3Com 3c509b, not working under RH 5.2 (Mykool)
  Re: howto setup a pop for dailup (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot. ("Bertie Price")
  Re: IP/MAC Routing (Malware)
  Re: Connect without hub ("Guy A. Wadsworth")
  Re: Login as root with telnet (Bernardo Santos Wernesback)
  Re: Hi, ("MrCyber")
  Re: ppp-on doesn't respond ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Where can I get documentation to help set an internet connection in Linux ("Mode 
Mungert")
  Re: 2 modems one connection ("Mark Vandersteen")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (mlw)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Terra")
  Re: AOL with IP masq (Benjohn007)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Richard Steiner)
  Re: Hubs (Richard Steiner)



From: Paul Gress [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:56:52 -0500

If the machines are connected direct, there cannot be any collisions.  Two wires
are for transmit and two wires are for receive.  This is why you need a crossover
in the wires.  So the computers can be connected:

Computer "A" Computer "B"

Xmit ---Rec
  Rec---Xmit

There cannot be a collision.  One computer the Xmit is connected directly to the
Rec and the Rec is connected directly to the Xmit.

With a Hub, all the Xmit's are connected on the same side, and all the Rec's are
connected on the same side.  It's up to the Hub to allow only one Xmit or Rec at
a time between one set of computers.  If two sets of computers try to communicate
to the same computer at the same time, there is a possibility of a collision.

Chris Cappuccio wrote:

 What about the situation where you are connecting together two machines
 via RJ45 ?  Don't ethernet cards with 10bT interfaces rely on the hub
 for collision detection?  If a hub detects a collision, it sends out a signal
 which causes the cards to retransmit...Otherwise packets are lost?

 In comp.dcom.lans.ethernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rob Wiltbank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  No, a hub is designed to to take packets and distribute them as best as
  is can to their destination.  You're more likely to have packets collide
  on a peer to peer than through a hub.

  Perhaps I am wrong, but I thought a hub simply made the appropriate
  electrical connections.  That is, to my knowledge, a hub does not
  deal with packets, only with electronics.  (If it deals with packets
  and distributes them to their destinations appropriately, then it
  is probably a switch.  Granted, one could say "hub" and mean
  "switching hub", but in those context (microhubs) that's probably
  not the idea.)

  So, in my understanding, you're *just* as likely to have packets
  collide on a two host network whether or not you have a hub.

- Logan

  ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
  http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

 --
 --
 More people have died in the last five minutes from alcohol and tobacco use
 than have died from LSD and MDMA use in the history of the world.


--

From: "Leo Stutzmann" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Firewall and IPSec
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:50:08 GMT

I have a private network with 5 machines (2 are NT, 1 is Win98, 2 are Linux
(RH5.2)). I have this network connected to a Firewall, also running RH5.2.
The firewall connects and masqerades to a cable modem to the Internet.
Everthing works great and I'm a happy camper.

Now work has implemented an Extranet host using IPSec. I have the client
installed on an NT machine.

Does anyone know how to configure the firewall to allow this traffic? Is
this possible? Or is there an IPSec patch that needs to be applied?

Thanks, any help would be appreciated.
Leo



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Barriault)
Subject: HELP: 3Com 3C900B-TPO NIC
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:28:46 GMT

Greetings,

I have a Win 95 system with a 3Com 3C900B-TPO NIC, and I would like to
convert the system over to use Linux. The Linux Ethernet-Howto doesn't
list this card as supported. Before I waste a lot of time trying to
get this card to work, I was wondering if anyone had any experience
with it and could at least tell me what driver to use?

Thanks,

Jeff B.

--

From: Peter W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux to Win95 Null-Modem Connection
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:56:04 -0500

jymohqes wrote:

 Can I send file between Windows 95 

Linux-Networking Digest #947

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #947, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 04:13:48 EST

Contents:
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Richard Steiner)
  Fun with ANSI color and prompts.  :-) (Richard Steiner)
  Re: Recomendation for external modem for Linux? (Gary Momarison)
  Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: 2 modems one connection ("Mark Vandersteen")
  Re: PLIP: Help on notebook ("Mark Vandersteen")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Jim Ross")
  Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Intel 82593 network card (Pierre-Yves Manach)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  PPP Problem--PPPD  CHAT doesn't hit modem, Miniconfig works, but... ("Steve 
Whitcher")
  Re: Setting up PPP (Roel Verheyen)
  Re: ping self (Bob)
  Re: ip masq... client ping time out. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:26:49 -0600

Here in comp.os.linux.networking, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (j)
spake unto us, saying:

The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks.

Other conclusions can be drawn, like

  "Linux networking is more flexible so there are more things to ask
   questions about",

or

  "Linux networking is different from what new users are used to, and
   the Linux community encourages asking questions on Usenet"

Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...

Then why can't Windows 95 OSR2 see my Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B NIC
at all when OS/2 Warp 4, Solaris 2.6, FreeBSD 2.2.7, and various Linux
flavors seem to see it fine?

Perhaps it's painless because it doesn't work.  :-)

Now you may try to defend Linux by saying that it has more
"flexibility" - but quite frankly we could do with a lot
less "flexibility" and a lot more simplicity.

I disagree, and I'd like to request that you stop speaking for me...

Now you thought I was just gonna flame ... nope. I've been
relatively polite and realistic here. There are MANY issues
to address, MANY refinements to be made before Linux becomes
a really good option for administrators of small/medium networks.

Yes, if you want to have such networks set up by people without UNIX
networking knowledge.  Whether that's a wise idea or not is up to the
entity supplying the boxes and depending on the network, of cource.

-- 
   -Rich Steiner  ---  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --- Bloomington, MN
   OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
  --- Eschew Obfuscation! ---

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Fun with ANSI color and prompts.  :-)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:15:38 -0600

Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Francesc Guasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake unto us, saying:

Yan Seiner wrote:
 
 I always set up my root shell in flaming pink.  That way I can't
 mistake what I'm doing ;-)
 
That's great !
Can you share with us how you do it ?

That's actually a common idea.  Not pink grin, but color-coding the
prompts.

I color-code my prompts here by system, and when I log in as root I
use red text with the system name in the center in the system's normal
color.  That helps me remember where I am.  :-)

The way to do it is to use ANSI escape sequences.  The ones I use on
one of my boxes is here:

Root prompt (set in /root/.bashrc):

PS1="\[\033[1;31;40m\][RH5 ** \[\033[1;32;40m\\h:\u\[\033[1;31;40m\] 
**]:\w#\[\033[0;37;40m\] "
export PS1

Normal prompt (set in ~/.bashrc):

case `tty` in
/dev/tty1 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-1 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
/dev/tty2 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-2 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
/dev/tty3 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-3 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
/dev/tty4 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-4 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
/dev/tty5 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-5 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
/dev/tty6 )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5-6 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
* )
PS1="\[\033[1;32;40m\][RH5 \h:\u]:\w\$\[\033[0;37;40m\] " ;;
esac

Some explanation: the "RH5" identifies the flavor of Linux I'm running
(since I have several of them installed here), and the following -# is
the virtual console number so I know which one I'm using.

-- 
   -Rich Steiner  ---  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --- Bloomington, MN
   OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
   All 

Linux-Networking Digest #948

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #948, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 06:13:41 EST

Contents:
  Re: onboard DSP winmodem? (Ray)
  2 modems one connection ("Your Name")
  3Com 3c509b, not working under RH 5.2 (Melvin Mathew Meadlin II)
  Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing? ("Scot E. Wilcoxon")
  Re: diald and assigned IP (and ipfwadm?) (Peter W)
  to get SATAN... ("Michael Lee Yohe")
  Re: Telnet, 2 minutes for conect.. ("Douglas S. Huneycutt, Sr.")
  Re: Disappearing Default IP Route (Bob)
  Diald make on RH 5.1 ("Joseph Kexel")
  Re: IP Aliasing problem (Alex Tsekhansky)
  Re: PPP/ISDN Problems.  Help! (Clifford Kite)
  Newbie with Connection Problems ("The News")
  Questions about NAMED at STARTUP ("[D]¥J")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (jedi)
  Re: Can't telnet to IMAP daemon's ports (Bob)
  Re: Telnet, 2 minutes for conect.. (TeoeT)
  RedHat 5.2 and NE2000 ("EC_IT")
  Re: Disappearing Default IP Route (Brian McCauley)
  Re: ip masq... client ping time out. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux/Win98 Network Problem (Gereon Wenzel)
  Re: Help! Ethernet problem II (still no clue) (Richard Hector)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: onboard DSP winmodem?
Date: 20 Jan 1999 08:29:46 GMT

On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 06:07:27 -, Simon Allfrey 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take it that this means that it's non-supported status is due to the
 fact that proprietary software is required rather than it's being an
intrinsically crummy device which freeloads off the CPU?

These still use the host's cpu to do some of the work, just not as much and
they still don't use the standard UART interface that real modems use.  Not
only won't these work in Linux, but Windows users will end up throwing them
away when Windows 2000 or whatever comes out unless Luscent feels like
re-writing the drivers.


Rob Clark wrote in message
Although it is not HSP, it is HCF, i.e. host-controller.  So it's still a
winmodem, just a different flavor of winmodem.
http://www.multiwave.com/pd_cw56kpci_lu.htm
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html




-- 
Ray 
ray AT sonictech DOT net

--

From: "Your Name" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 modems one connection
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:14:38 +

I was wondering how I would go about using two mdoems, connecting them to
the same isp and evenly distributing the bandwidth between the two of them.
tortexbigfoot.com
-AL

--

From: Melvin Mathew Meadlin II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: 3Com 3c509b, not working under RH 5.2
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:42:48 -0800

Hello,
I have a 3com 3c509b ethernet card which works fine under Windows 95,
but I can't get it to work under Red Hat 5.2.  Does anyone have any
suggestions

-- 
Melvin Mathew Meadlin II

If is the biggest word in the middle of life
Melvin Mathew Meadlin

--

Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:12:50 -0600
From: "Scot E. Wilcoxon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hackers used my linuxserver be hacked gateway How to fixing?

 I thought the security bugs were long ago fixed! Or are you reporting
 something which was only true long ago? I haven't see anything from CERT
 on this in recent software...

See http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/rh52-errata-general.html
but it says the 5.2 server was already repaired.

--

From: Peter W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diald and assigned IP (and ipfwadm?)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:17:22 -0500

Troutman wrote:

 Alsowhen setting up rules in ipfwadm, it requires the ip of the
 interface.  When running pppd using a variable IP address, what is the
 easiest way to get the info into IPFWADM?

ipfwadm does NOT require your interface's IP address. Use the -W option, e.g.
for SMTP
   ipfwadm -I -P tcp -a accept -W ppp0 -D 0.0.0.0/0 25

-Peter


--

From: "Michael Lee Yohe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: to get SATAN...
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:59:32 -0600
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux,comp.security.unix,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.security.firewalls,comp.security.misc

you may want to take a look at SATAN: System Administrator Tool for
Analyzing Network

Where can this program be found ?? I am very interested in it too !

http://www.fish.com/satan/

 ***
 * Michael Lee Yohe   Office:  TH N318 *
 * UAH ASPIRE System AdministratorOffice: 256-890-6904 *
 * UAH CS Assistant Administrator   Home: 256-828-2667 *
 * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Web: http://www.aspire.cs.uah.edu/mlyohe *
 

Linux-Networking Digest #949

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #949, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 08:13:54 EST

Contents:
  Benchmark ("Denis Titho")
  TCP wrappers busted my mountd? ("David J. Topper")
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Matthew Kirkwood)
  Re: Disappearing Default IP Route (Dieter Hackl)
  nameserver problem (Dieter Hackl)
  Re: Netgear FA310TX, new tulip.c, still doesn't work (Troutman)
  Sendmail is running, so why the download error? ("minstrel")
  eth and ppp settings deactivate sometimes, help ("Scott MacDonald")
  Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot. (Matt Kressel)
  3C905B-TX (Paul Hardiman)
  Re: User quota (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
  PCI FAST Ethernet DEC 21143 Based Adapter ("Travis Lower")
  Re: ATT worldnet ??? PPP (Ken Oster)
  Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  device or resource busy (Klaus Leopold)
  Re: Connect without hub ("Guy A. Wadsworth")
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Villy Kruse)
  Re: S: MB86965 Ethernetcontroller-Driver (Russell Nelson)
  hostname (none) (Samuel Adams)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (mlw)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Recommendations for an External ISDN Modem? (Mark Cooperstein)



From: "Denis Titho" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Benchmark
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:00:27 +0100

Hi!

I've to test the performance in a LAN with let's say 100 workstations.

So the question is: How can I test this - are there any tools available?

The tool should tell me about:
min/average/max transferred KB/S
min/average/max time until a response arrives
...

Of course it would be really nice if the tool could simulate 10/25/50
"typical" users...

Yeah, I know the description above isn't real concrete but please make
suggestions anyway. Thanks.

cu,
Denis

PS: Please answer also to my pm-adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



--

From: "David J. Topper" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP wrappers busted my mountd?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:07:37 GMT

Hey folks,

I just set up a MOSTLY CLOSED tcp wrapper schema.  Now my machines can't
mount?  But I thought mountd had nothing to do with wrappers.  Besides
that, I have all the machines that need to talk to each other defined in
/etc/hosts.allow.

I CAN telnet between all the machines.

?

Thanks,

Dave Topper
--
Technical Director, Virginia Center for Computer Music
Programmer / Analyst, Dean's Office (School of AS)
http://www.panix.com/~topper
(804) 924-6887

--

From: Matthew Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:21:19 +

On 20 Jan 1999, Villy Kruse wrote:

 I have seen this happen before.  In my case the hacker first broke into an NT
 machine (has microsoft ever made a product that was secure? ;-) ) then used
 SAMBA to access the server.  I have disable this product and my hacker
 problems disappeared.
 
 Is samba able to access any directory other than those you specifically 
 specify as shares in the smb.conf?

Sort of.  Last time I looked it would happily follow symlinks outside the
share's 'root' directory.

A symlink to / allows access to the whole lot..

Matthew.


--

From: Dieter Hackl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Disappearing Default IP Route
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:14:06 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

if you're using dynamic ip addresses, you have to put the /sbin/init.d/route
start command into your /etc/ppp/ip-up script.
i had the same problem, and found this solution in a german linux database.
this problem occurs only if you are getting a dynamic ip address from your
provider.

dodo.

August Johnson wrote:

I've got a problem that's plagued several Redhat 5.0 systems I've made.
 I've used the network setup to set up the default IP route.  This route
 works for 5-10 minutes and then disappears from the routing table.  If I
 then manually type it in "route add -net 0.0.0.0 gw 209.63.xxx.xxx eth0"
 everything works fine from then on, as long as I don't restart the system.

I tried putting this statement in rc.local, but it acts no different.
 Until the route vanishes on it's own, typing it manually won't make it stay
 around.  Can anyone tell me if I'm missing something?  The Redhat
 installation is just as it comes when it's installed from the CD.  Yeah, I
 know I should be using 5.2, that'll happen soon.

 Thanks!

 August


--

From: Dieter Hackl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: nameserver problem
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:21:22 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi!

i have set up a nameserver with a forwarding entry to my isp's dns.
now my ippp-daemon is dialing every 3 to 4 minutes with udp-request to
my isp's dns.
i dont know which names or 

Linux-Networking Digest #950

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #950, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 13:13:31 EST

Contents:
  Re: After IFCONFIG, What? (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
  Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net (Norm)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Charles Stack")
  Re: hostname (none) (Peter W)
  beyond DNS (Leland Kofford)
  Samba setup (Scallica)
  Windows 95 and Linux Server? (Allen Beddingfield)
  died on signal 11 ?? Help! ("Irene ah!")
  Re: Iinux manual (Matt Kressel)
  Logging into Netware server. (Allen Beddingfield)
  Remote Printing (Larry Rivera)
  DHCPCD Startup ("Gary Dinham")
  Question: Re: Weird 3COM Card Problem - Help Please
  Re: Which processes listen on which ports ? (Christophe KUMSTA)
  Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10+ ISA and Redhat 5.2 ("jkim")
  Re: Windows 95 and Linux Server? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  I need information ("Fer Bor")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Arthur)
  Re: 3 nics  Linux Firewall ("Erik")
  Re: RedHat 5.2 and NE2000 (Matt Kressel)
  Re: sendmail message ' we do not relay' (Matt Kressel)
  Re: 3Com 3c509b, not working under RH 5.2 (Scallica)
  Re: ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument (Richard Griswold)
  eth0: The transmission stopped! (Bill Cripe)



From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: After IFCONFIG, What?
Date: 20 Jan 99 11:54:57 GMT

Compile your kernel with ne2000 support. is solve most of the problem.
I did had to add my probing line for ne2000...


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (T.L. (Terry) Branscombe) writes:
:My NE2000-clone has recently become undetectable by Linux.  I suspect I
:accidently deleted a file required by the INIT process, but which one?
:
:The boot time messages have disappeared, so that now, the section headed
:" installing net devices " is completely blank.  Also, just after
:the /proc filesystem is loaded, I receive messages similar to:
:
:  SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
:  SIOCSIBADDR: No such device
:  ...
:
:It used to
:tell me that the IRQ and BASEADDR of the NIC.
:
:I have tried the following boot parameters:
:
:  linux ether=0,0,eth0
:  linux ether=12,300,eth0
:
:and tried ifconfig with the IP address of my machine from the hosts file:
:
:  ifconfig eth0 192.168.110.1 up
:  and received:
:  SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
:
:Can anyone suggest some checks I should make?  Thanks.
:--
: It sounds as if you do not have the driver in your kernel. Is your
: kernel new?
:+--+
:Terrence  Branscombe
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
===

Jayasuthan
[Fairchild Information System Support]

[Internal]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

--

From: Norm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 05:20:34 -0800

Hi,

What NIC board are you using, if it is a 3com you will need to shut the
power off completely when going from Windows to Linux. For some reason
these boards will not reset the chip and you will not get an address for
the board.

Norm


--

From: "Charles Stack" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 09:13:25 -0500

Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...

Oh, really?

I am a Windoze developer by profession.  I run Linux at home and for
everything else I do.  When I joined the Linux community, I didn't have a
clue about Linux (or Unix in general) except for the limited work I did in
college.  I'm still relatively clueless (but getting more knowledgable
everyday).  Here's what this clueless person has done with Linux:

1) Developed client/server applications using Borland Delphi C/S and
Interbase for Linux.  The resulting application (i.e the Interbase server)
runs 24x7 with 24x7 availability for the clients.  This was my first
project.

2) Developing a PERL module to access Interbase directly.

3) Wrote PPP scripts that allowed me to connect to my multiple ISPs.

4) Set my server to as a PPP dialin server.  I can now call my machine at
home securely and work on my machine.

5) Reconfigured my dialin server so that I can dialin to my PC AND surf the
internet at the same time.

6) Learning about setting up networks (I have a 3 PC network).

7) Setup and operate and FTP and HTTP server.

8) Share my files on my server with my Windoze clients using SAMBA.

Yeah...Linux networking sucks.

It would be nice if some of the tools were a bit easier to use.  But, they
work.  Usability will 

Linux-Networking Digest #952

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #952, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 18:13:44 EST

Contents:
  Re: Connect without hub (Robert Yoder)
  Re: Linux, Cablemodems and static ips ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Todd Knarr)
  Re: smaba  win98 (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: What is pppd doing to my poor modem? ("Stu")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Bernd Eckenfels)
  Re: Linux server on small network ("Robin Malton")
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Leslie Mikesell)
  Re: Crystal CS8920 driver needed. (Terrelle Shaw)
  Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Transmit time out ("Daren Jacobs")
  Re: Disk size req'd for Linux cable modem server (Nikhil Sharma)
  Re: forwarding, masquerading, firewalling?? (Andrew Pickin)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Satch)
  Long UsersIds (Francisco Ruiz)
  Reading from serial port --- PLEASE HELP! (Jussi Kuikka)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Reinder)
  Minimum call timer on diald? (Martin)



From: Robert Yoder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 23:34:58 -0700

Paul Gress wrote:
 
 If the machines are connected direct, there cannot be any collisions.  Two wires
 are for transmit and two wires are for receive.  This is why you need a crossover
 in the wires.  So the computers can be connected:
 
 Computer "A" Computer "B"
 
 Xmit ---Rec
   Rec---Xmit
 
 There cannot be a collision.  One computer the Xmit is connected directly to the
 Rec and the Rec is connected directly to the Xmit.
 
 With a Hub, all the Xmit's are connected on the same side, and all the Rec's are
 connected on the same side.  It's up to the Hub to allow only one Xmit or Rec at
 a time between one set of computers.  If two sets of computers try to communicate
 to the same computer at the same time, there is a possibility of a collision.

From: http://www.lantronix.com/htmfiles/mrktg/catalog/et.htm

  "A hub takes any incoming signal and repeats it out all ports."

That is, a hub is just a multi-port repeater.
It makes _NO_ decisions about the communication going on between
machines.


 Chris Cappuccio wrote:
 
  What about the situation where you are connecting together two machines
  via RJ45 ?  Don't ethernet cards with 10bT interfaces rely on the hub
  for collision detection?  If a hub detects a collision, it sends out a signal
  which causes the cards to retransmit...Otherwise packets are lost?
 
  In comp.dcom.lans.ethernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 Rob Wiltbank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   No, a hub is designed to to take packets and distribute them as best as
   is can to their destination.  You're more likely to have packets collide
   on a peer to peer than through a hub.
 
   Perhaps I am wrong, but I thought a hub simply made the appropriate
   electrical connections.  That is, to my knowledge, a hub does not
   deal with packets, only with electronics.  (If it deals with packets
   and distributes them to their destinations appropriately, then it
   is probably a switch.  Granted, one could say "hub" and mean
   "switching hub", but in those context (microhubs) that's probably
   not the idea.)
 
   So, in my understanding, you're *just* as likely to have packets
   collide on a two host network whether or not you have a hub.
 
 - Logan
 
   ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
   http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
 
  --
  --
  More people have died in the last five minutes from alcohol and tobacco use
  than have died from LSD and MDMA use in the history of the world.


Robert Yoder
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Unix:  The Solution to the W2K Problem."













































. 

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux, Cablemodems and static ips
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 20:33:39 GMT

Well, I'm having a problem getting DHCP to work. I have Red Hat 5.2 and I've
read both HOWTO's on dhcpcd and cablemodems. I've gone as far as rewriting the
scripts and still nothing works...if I set the modem as a static IP (which I'm
really stealing use of an IP) it works just fine. And I can get dhcpcd to work
if I manually set -h switch to my host name.

If any one has any answers than send me an e-mail.

Thanks

Jake

In article 75mtev$779$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 But it works when I enable DHCP, and doesn't work when I change it to manual.
 Any other ideas?

 Jay

 In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
   I'm having problems running Linux on my cablemodem with my static ip. Does
   someone have any 

Linux-Networking Digest #953

1999-01-20 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #953, Volume #9  Wed, 20 Jan 99 20:13:39 EST

Contents:
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Forest Gump")
  Re: DHCP and DNS (again) (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Forest Gump")
  Re: How to install a RTL8139 network card ("Frank Dijcks")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Bob Taylor")
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Bob Taylor")
  Usernet/Logger (James Whelan)
  Re: Why doesn't my ppp-on script work when su'ing (Stuart Morrison)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(jim)
  Re: Connect without hub ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Samba and "Sendmail" on a notebook (Villy Kruse)
  Re: 2 generic PCI NE2000 Nics how to ? ("Jim Orona III")
  TCP/IP Configuration ("Judge Gotstein")
  Re: Linux-Linux networking problem (Richard Hector)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: "Forest Gump" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:43:41 -0400

Hmm,

Did it ever occur to you, that the reason it seems so hard is that you
probably don't know what you're doing? Linux just has a higher learning
curve -- but it pays.
I'm not flaming you, because I'm in exactly the same situation, but consider
the _fact_ that as soon as you have a good working understanding of what
you're doing, everything becomes so simple, you wonder how you ever went
wrong...
But unlike Windoze, you'll actually know how it works, not just how to get
it working on only one machine. In one month of use, it still doesn't work
perfectly, but my knowledge has at least doubled, just by using something
non-MS.

Then again, we have to wonder what you're doing on this board in the first
place.
If you don't like Linux, fix it or drop it.
Power, flexibility, extensibility, and _stability_

That would be "The Linux Way", as you (didn't) put it

j wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks.
 yidda-da-yadda

*note: this is a test to see if my news works*



--

From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP and DNS (again)
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 08:48:12 +

Stephen Carville [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Is it possible to have a DNS server  forward a request to another
 server?  Specifically, I want the primary DNS server for my company to
 forward unresolved requests for our local domain to the DHCP server
 which will also be running named.  This way I can keep the database on
 the DHCP server up to date but update the primary server at longer
 intervals -- maybe once per day.  From RTing the FM this _looks_
 possible (using the forwarding directive?) but my experience with DNS
 is too limited for me to commit to it.

AFAIK this is not possible using standard BIND.  BIND does not forward
requests for domains for which it considers itself authoratative.

You can, of course, put the DHCP allocated names in a subdomain and
deligate it.

Alternatively use a DNS server that supports dynamic updates and send
it dynamic updates.  Eventually dhcpd will be able to do this
automatically.

-- 
 \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from| Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\/~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\   ~   ~ ~~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

--

From: "Forest Gump" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:46:20 -0400

I have to agree, read my earlier post with a grain of salt plz.






--

From: "Frank Dijcks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to install a RTL8139 network card
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 22:36:42 +0100

Well, I found the cause myself!

For anyone who's interested...

I swapped the 10Mbps and 100Mbps PCI network cards.
Somehow the port or interrupt assignment has something to do with it.

If anyone knows the real reason I appreciate a message.


Frank Dijcks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--

Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Bob Taylor")
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:03:27 GMT

In article 783hik$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

[snip]

 offcourse a real user friendly system would not put the purdon on the user
 to figure the order of those 6 or 7 rpms to install. but offcourse this is
 unix. if the things was so seemless with no manual steps involved and no
 things the user need to know before hand, then it will a boring system,
 and there will be nothing to 

Linux-Networking Digest #957

1999-01-21 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #957, Volume #9  Thu, 21 Jan 99 07:13:38 EST

Contents:
  Re: MSG_WAITALL and Error: Bad Address on recv() (Malware)
  Re: FTP problem - RedHat 5.2 (Regit Young)
  Re: NFS problem - RedHat 5.2 (Bill Unruh)
  Re:linux newbie question (James Spooner)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Sechylmanos)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Sechylmanos)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Sechylmanos)
  SMP linux crashes badly ! (Fred)
  Help with PPP Server setup (Greg Roberts)
  Re: Multiple Servers under Apache (John O'Donnell)
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Thomas Stieler)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(Phil Stripling)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Jay D Ribak")
  irc server problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Login as root with telnet (Steve Ledford)
  kernel: VFS: No free inodes - contact Linus (Matt Corddry)
  Re: NFS problem - RedHat 5.2 ("greyman")
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Richard Steiner)



From: Malware [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MSG_WAITALL and Error: Bad Address on recv()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:28:10 +0100

I am trying to write a communications program with a TCP-enabled piece
 of equipment, but I'm running into some problems.
 
 1)  It seems that the MSG_WAITALL flag is not defined in
 /usr/include/linux/socket.h.  Is this flag not supported under

Here it is:

malware:/home/malware  grep MSG_WAITALL /usr/include/linux/socket.h
#define MSG_WAITALL 0x100   /* Wait for a full request */

This is a kernel 2.1.132.


Malware

--

From: Regit Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: FTP problem - RedHat 5.2
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:33:49 +0800

Does your particular ftpd needs a ftpuser file? Check the documentation that
comes with it.

Regit

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've managed to setup a FTP daemon on the two Linux boxes I've connected via a
 private network. However I'm having this problem accessing the other Linux box
 via FTP. The problem is as follows:

 ftp fairlane
 Connected to fairlane
 220 fairlane.fords.com.au FTP Server ..
 Name (fairlane:root): ftp
 530 User ftp access denied
 Login failed

 I only have two Linux machines connected to each other and I can't ftp both
 ways. Using either machine to access the other via ftp gets the above error
 message. I have setup a ftp account. I've also tried root and my personal
 account both getting the above message. I don't have a \etc\ftpusers file so
 I assume that no user accounts are denied at all. Also I've checked
 hosts.allow and that is set as ALL : ALL  and nothing is in hosts.deny so
 what could be the problem? It seems strange that it didn't even ask me for
 the password before giving me the error message. I've installed wu-ftppackage
 on both machines as well. I was able to telnet to one other no problems and
 NFS works as well. So can anyone tell me what's going on? Thanks.

 Timbo.

 ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
 http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: NFS problem - RedHat 5.2
Date: 21 Jan 1999 08:20:06 GMT

In 786im3$rop$[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

So I guess I can successfully run NFS manually after boot time but how do I
get it so that rpc.mountd  rpc.nfsd service is started automatically each
time I boot?

Is this correct? I thought this should be started in rc.d? Sorry for the long
message..trying to give you as much info as I can. Thanks.

Yup. Start it in /etc/rc.d
So on my system
ls /etc/rc.d/*/*nfs*
/etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs*  /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S15nfsfs@
/etc/rc.d/init.d/nfsfs*/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S60nfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K20nfs@/etc/rc.d/rc4.d/S15nfsfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K95nfsfs@  /etc/rc.d/rc4.d/S60nfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K20nfs@/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S15nfsfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K95nfsfs@  /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S60nfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc2.d/K20nfs@/etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K20nfs@
/etc/rc.d/rc2.d/K95nfsfs@  /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K95nfsfs@

Ie, you want to start up both nfs and nfsd  (in runlevels 3-5). This
should have occured automatically when you told the installation program
you wanted to set up nfs (ie be a nfs server)


--

From: James Spooner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: nz.comp
Subject: Re:linux newbie question
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 22:17:05 +1300

I wrote a little shell script for IPChains (found in 2.1 and 2.2 kernels,
also 2.0 with patch).

You can edit firewall rulesets then apply them, disable the firewall,
etc.. It's designed to fit into the FFS (slackware users need not apply),
and the debian init stuff.

James Spooner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
I mess with computers.


On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, ian wrote:

 
 
 Haaino 

Linux-Networking Digest #959

1999-01-21 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #959, Volume #9  Thu, 21 Jan 99 12:13:42 EST

Contents:
  IPX-Error starting mars netware  server emulation ("Axel Hoelzer")
  Re: Diald make on RH 5.1 (Villy Kruse)
  Re: setting up network (Francesc Guasch)
  Disabling TCP Wrappers (Scallica)
  Re: Linux server on small network ("David G. Bell")
  Re: Boot Rom (Francesc Guasch)
  Frametype 802.3 SNAP ("Alexander Pflaum")
  IPCHAINS and Port Forwarding... Together?? (Aaron Helleman)
  nmap won't run as root ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: fetchmail ("minstrel")
  Re: Fax Server under Linux? ("Remy Schleimer")
  YCL Ethernet card and RedHat install (Seth Bagley)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Matthias Warkus)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Stephen Carville)
  Re: DHCP and DNS (again) (Stephen Carville)
  Multiple Card Problem (Peter Hernberg)
  Name Mangling Problem!?!? (Dan Falk)
  IP allocation on a small network (Sheer El-Showk)
  Re: Samba:Can't write/create from Win95 (Greer Reichow)



From: "Axel Hoelzer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPX-Error starting mars netware  server emulation
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 19:10:03 +0100

Hello,
while trying to start the Novell Netware Server emulation MARS (V.o.00p112)
I get the following error message:

!! NWSERV 0  0:PANIC   !!
NWSERV 0   0:EMUTLI: init_ipx: invalid argument

The IPX-Protocol is supported by the kernel, and I have set up the
/etc/nwserv.conf for my configuration.

Can anybody help?

Regards

Axel


[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: Diald make on RH 5.1
Date: 21 Jan 1999 15:09:35 +0100



Go to the contrib ftp site at redhat or its mirror sites.  People have
already solved this problem more than a year ago and were kind enough to
donate the result to ftp://contrib.redhat.com where you can download it.


Villy



In article 7823dm$7po$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Joseph Kexel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been having a great deal of trouble getting diald to to compile on my
RH 5.1 systems (I have 2, one full and one partial install). Generally, I
get many errors in reference to in.h which finally ends in an ERROR1,
terminating the make process. I have been unable to get any object files
successfully created. I have checked and I have 2 instances of in.h on the
system. The warnings I receive refer to both files. I have tried renaming
each alternately and using the make -i to force a compile, but no luck.
Its seems strange that a full install of RH 5.1 and a fresh download of
diald would produce such errors. Any suggestions would be greatly
appreciated.





--

From: Francesc Guasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: setting up network
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 15:09:59 +0100

Adam Hamflett wrote:
 
 I am cofused about linux networks.
 Are there any good sites which tell how to set up security, ipx tcp etc?
 
 i have got the drivers loaded, but thats as far as ive got. what do i
 need to do now.
 
 also i want to be able to tel net in from a windows 98 based machine and
 copy files off and to my linux machine. how is this done.
 
 i have a ne 2000 combatible card.

Look for the Network Administrators Guide (NAG).

-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.etsetb.upc.es/~frankie
 ^-^.-, 
 o o _ ) Errors, like straws, upon the surface flow;
  Y (_, (__(Ssss He who would search for pearls must dive below.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scallica)
Subject: Disabling TCP Wrappers
Date: 19 Jan 1999 17:00:30 GMT


Hey,

I am using Redhat 5.2. I am using the INET service thing. I can't seem to get
telnet and ftp access to my machine. I think its because of the tcp wrappers
not allowing me to connect. So how can I disable the tcp wrappers? Thanx.

P.S. - I shut down inetd and them started in.telnetd manually using the -debug
flag, and telnet worked! But the process died after a few minutes.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("David G. Bell")
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux server on small network
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 99 18:38:12 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Taylor" writes:

 I've just put a new network together at home it's only 3PC's but it does
 what I need. I have two windows machines sharing a monitor and the linux
 machine sits across the other side of the room without a keyboard or
 monitor. The linux machine is all set up but I find that the windows telnet
 program is no good for dealing with PICO etc if I have to change a
 configuration. Can anyone suggest a Windows program which can do full screen
 colour terminal logins ? I really want to use BitchX under linux as well.

The free telnet programs which come with Windows are pretty poor.  I use 
a program called ZOC which will run either over a serial connection or a 
network stack.  Demo 

Linux-Networking Digest #960

1999-01-21 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #960, Volume #9  Thu, 21 Jan 99 15:13:38 EST

Contents:
  IP Tunnelling-NO QUAKE! (Malay Shah)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("G.T.")
  Re: sendmail message ' we do not relay' (Duncan Simpson)
  Re: Wardialer War Dialer WARDIALER WARDIAL windows95 windows98 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux server on small network (Karl A. Krueger)
  Re: Fax Server under Linux? ("Der Ubermensch")
  Re: Tools to parse the protocols from the files captured by tcpdump  snoop (Barry 
Margolin)
  Re: securing a linux box (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: ISP Setup on Red Hat 5.1 (David Kirkpatrick)
  httpd (Unix Adm)
  Re: HELP: IBM ISA Token Ring 16/4 ("Richard Payne")
  Printing from Linux to a Win95 printer ("Robert H. Thompson")



From: Malay Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Tunnelling-NO QUAKE!
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:13:49 GMT

I have a problem with IP Tunnelling...I can get it to connect and I can
ping packets across the network, I can also connect to an ftp server
inside the other persons network using tunnellingbut the only thing
I can't do is run a quake game via this link.  I think it may be
associated with something to do with routing.  i have one route
connecting the two networks together and it looks like this
route add -net 192.168.65.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw (External IP of
remote machine)
Also I'm masquerading to the internet, could that be causing a problem?

--

From: "G.T." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:12:34 -0800

wow, i didn't know the answer to all of our problems was simply, DRAG+DROP!
nothing like choosing convenience over everything else!!!  i have seen the
light, and it is DROG+DRAP, the solution to all of our ills.

what a joker.

jedi wrote in message ...
On 19 Jan 1999 19:12:20 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arthur says...

Jim Ross wrote:


To install downloaded rpm's under KDE:

1. Open kfm file manager (one click)
2. Find the subdirectory you d/l'd to (I realize this
may be a problem for some Windows users)
3. Left click the package name
4. After kpackage opens, click install
5. Wait (less than 15 seconds on average)
6. Close kpackage, kinstall
7. Run the program

(You can also do this from the command line even more
quickly, or use xrpm or glint if you're not using KDE)


expect you need to install KDE to use kfm.

and wih KDE rpms, you need to install the packages in correct order you
twit.

 No you don't. That workaround is quite well documented.
 Nevermind that quite a few distros INCLUDE it to begin with.


you sort of hand waved your hands of this little point, did'nt you?
there are core rpms for KDE and then the extra/additional ones.

so it is not as easy as you pretend it is.

 Yes it is. You just find it convenient to ignore the
 easy answers that are trivial to come acroos.


offcourse a real user friendly system would not put the purdon on the user
to figure the order of those 6 or 7 rpms to install. but offcourse this is
unix. if the things was so seemless with no manual steps involved and no
things the user need to know before hand, then it will a boring system,
and there will be nothing to tinker with.

a real system will be much simpler that what you said.

a real easy to use system will work like this:

You see a "package" or set of packages on the net, to install them, you
drag it/them , and drop it/them, on "my computer".

DONE.

the 'system' will WORRY about everything else.

drag+drop.

that is all what should be needed to do this.

 Even I have that and I run neither Gnome or KDE on
 a regular basis.


you can even drag a whole collection of packages, and it will still work.

drag+drop.

nothing more.


 ...and the effect on the system be damned?

 That's why opening a whole bunch of files at once
 in explorer or even fileman can be such a royal
 pain in the ass: no thoughts given to boundary
 error condidions, really simply shit.


none of this rpm crap at the user level. burry RPM inside only for those
who want to use it directly.

drag+drop.

learn this concept. it's good for you.

 I do it all the time in Unix. I did it all the time
 in other OSes long before Windows crawled its way
 into existence.

 Although, a simple single/doubleclick/context menu
 would be rather more appropriate. It requires less
 information and manipulation to accomplish. This
 kind of thoughtly usability is why Windows is such
 a mess.

--
 Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats

Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out   / | \
as soon as your grip slips.

 In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Subject: Re: sendmail message ' we do not relay'
Date: 21 

Linux-Networking Digest #964

1999-01-22 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #964, Volume #9  Fri, 22 Jan 99 00:13:31 EST

Contents:
  Scheduled PPP? (Bruce Barnett)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? ("Mark Vandersteen")
  Botting diskless SPARCstation off redhat5.2 unsuccessfull...please help 
("p.wojcieszak")
  Re: Cable Modem problems (Buster_Bear)
  Re: IP Masq  Civ 2 MPE (Dan Kegel)
  Re: 3Com 3c509b, not working under RH 5.2 (Dan Kegel)
  Re: Connect without hub (Wolfgang Kleinhappl)
  Re: Extraction of IP address ("Rob Lauer")
  TCP/IP help (Ziae)
  Re: diald help. (Vincent Zweije)
  Re: Multiple 3c509 ("Kyle Bowerman")
  FTP files not visible (Ron Thompson)
  Re: RedHat Linux 5.1  Ethernet 3c509 NIC ("Kyle Bowerman")
  Re: Transmit time out (David Kirkpatrick)



From: Bruce Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: linux.dev.ppp
Subject: Scheduled PPP?
Date: 22 Jan 1999 02:50:10 GMT

I have a PPP link set up to disconnect when idle for 10 minutes.
However, it immediately reconnects. How is this decision made?
I want to scheule a connection ABOUT once an hour, that disconnects when
idle. The PPP docs suggest DIP, while anothe document suggests diald. 
The PPP people don't want to talk about either, so I have to figure
out how to integrate the packages. It seems a shame, because PPP
ALMOST does what I want it to do.

The setup scripts are convoluted. Can someone give me a pointer on how
to accomplish the task? Or how the scripts are organized?
The README file does a very poor job of explaining the dozens of script
files used.

If I could put a DELAY between the shutdone and the startup, I'd
solve most of my problem. But this isn't documented as far as I can
tell.

Can anyone help?

--

From: "Mark Vandersteen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 13:31:42 +1030

Your answers is plain and simple "DONT USE IT", go back to windoze, stop
rubbishing something you know nothing about.

If you take time to actually learn how to do something insead of using
something without reading the instructions like 99% of people in todays
world then you might actually benefit from it.

Keep your rubbish in the windows newsgroup thanks :)

From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (j)
 The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
 unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks.
 Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
 couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
 locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
 Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...
 Now you may try to defend Linux by saying that it has more
 "flexibility" - but quite frankly we could do with a lot
 less "flexibility" and a lot more simplicity. I'll bet
 that 95% of users just want to tie into a local NT server
 or use Linux AS a file/print server for Winders PCs.
 I think that "flexibility" is just an excuse - a euphamism
 for "a bunch of really unsophisticated little utilities
 written with no real plan in mind by people with a fetish
 for cryptic poorly-documented command-line parameters and
 well-hidden config files". As is, Linux is a user-UNfriendly
 mirror of MSDOS - and that goes double for "connectivity" issues.
 Want cheap PC networking  connectivity ? One "L" word comes
 to mind and it's NOT "Linux" - try "LanTastic" instead.
 Now Linux IS relatively compact and fast and DOES get past
 some of the old buggaboos inherent to DOS-derived systems,
 but Linux just isn't "ripe" yet. It needs DUN boxes and
 "Network" panels which HELP you with things and show all
 the pertinent options and conflicts right there.
 Someone could make a LOT of money if they could put together
 a turn-key Linux-based file/print server package which could
 autoconfigure most things and be really easy and helpful on
 the rest. Something you take out of the box and 20 minutes
 later you have a good working server. You can do that with
 Winders, but not with Linux unless you apparently have put
 in a tremendous number of obsessive hours.
 Now you thought I was just gonna flame ... nope. I've been
 relatively polite and realistic here. There are MANY issues
 to address, MANY refinements to be made before Linux becomes
 a really good option for administrators of small/medium networks.
 As much as I dislike Winders, it's a positive relief to boot
 back into it after fooling around for hours in vain with Linux.
 Preferring Winders to ANYTHING ... IMHO that's a pretty severe
 indictment. Linux has been badly over-sold. If it weren't so
 cheap it would be a rip-off ... a hobby OS masquerading as
 the "real deal".




--

From: "p.wojcieszak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Botting diskless SPARCstation off redhat5.2 unsuccessfull...please help
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:39:30 +1100

PROBLEM:
A diskless SPARCstation ELC will not boot of redhat 5.2.


Linux-Networking Digest #967

1999-01-22 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #967, Volume #9  Fri, 22 Jan 99 08:13:44 EST

Contents:
  Re: IP Aliasing problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: nfs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Extraction of IP address ("Rob Lauer")
  Re: Minimum call timer on diald? (Martin)
  Re: Hi, (Steve Romero)
  autofs using smbmount ("John M. Flinchbaugh")
  Re: Why doesn't my ppp-on script work when su'ing (Pat Thoyts)
  "New Mail"-Notification via smbclient (Marcus Faure)
  looking for informations for network project in VN (Nguyen-Dai Quy)
  Re: Reading from serial port --- PLEASE HELP! (Robert Lynch)
  Re: PCMCIA Network card (David Moulton)
  Re: DHCP on linux and win 95 A (Joerg Klaas)
  Re: PPP doesn't work when eth0 is active (Reinder)
  Two network cards? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Scheduled PPP? (Bruce Barnett)
  Re: Win95 to Linux via Serial ports/PPP (Richard Hector)
  Re: Romote "root" login (Kees Schrama)
  Re: Romote "root" login ("Bas Mevissen")
  Re: Connect without hub (Jerry Mendes)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Aliasing problem
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 10:01:16 GMT

In article 77j07f$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  "Alex Tsekhansky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a problem configuring aliasing on RedHat 5.1.

 I compiled kernel with aliasing included and when I try to use something
 like

 ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.0.1

 I get an error message

 SIOCSIFADDR: Invalid argument

 Also if I try to load ip_alias.o with insmod, I get

 ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol register_net_alias_type_R9eeab982
 ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol ip_rt_dev_Rde10f949
 ip_alias.o: unresolved symbol unregister_net_alias_type_R575fb95a

 I would appreciate any thoughts and/or comments.

 Alex.



I was the same problem...
Edit /etc/conf.modules an change:
alias netalias-2 ip_alias
by
alias net_alias-2 ip_alias

Good Luck !!!

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: nfs
Date: 22 Jan 1999 08:42:06 GMT


Hi,

David Kirkpatrick spoke these words of wisdom:
: Is this the result of some previously useful cron job?  What is
: in

Well, I think you got the solution there. I believe Joe stumbled
over an 'updatedb' run by cron. This updates the databes needed
when you do a 'locate filename', so that you do not have
to run a long 'find / filename'!

Bye,
Michael


: the cron log.  It would be helpful to have your top line for
: the top printout.  0:27 is that the time and how long was the 
: fine going ?? was it 27 seconds?  If someone has such a process
: started for a good reason then its priority may be scaled back or
: nice'd into obscurity.
: David Kirkpatrick 
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

: Joe Ringer wrote:
: 
: Occassionally my harddisk goes wild with activity and top reports:
: 
:  263 root  14   0  992  368  256 R91.4  0.5  0:27 find / ( -fstype
: nfs -o -fstype
: 
: Any ideas what's going on?
: 
: --
: clear skies,|http://www.erols.com/jringer3/astro1.htm
: Joe |
: |The internet treats censorship like
: |damage and routes around it.

: -- 
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
 the above email addr might disappear, reply to: 
 Michael.Sievers -(at)- desy.de  

Black holes are where God divided by zero.

--

From: "Rob Lauer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extraction of IP address
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:59:46 -0500

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
785q4k$78n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Can somebody help me out?  I'm trying to use a shell script that needs my
IP
address (from the ppp0 interface), so that i can use a command such as:

echo `date` : `myipaddress.sh` /var/log/temp.log

Anyone know of any script or program to do this?  Thanks!

  Luke Reeves
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://members.xoom.com/LukeReeves/

---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Sorry, I couldn't resist a challenge...this could be fun.  How many
different ways
can you do this?

If you can use ksh...here goes (note the colons!)

#!/bin/ksh
set -A MYIP $(ifconfig ppp0 | grep "inet addr:")
ISP_IP=${MYIP[1]#*:}
echo $ISP_IP




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin )
Subject: Re: Minimum call timer on diald?
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 99 10:27:26 GMT

Many thanks to all who suggested IMPULSE - haven't had time to look at it in 
detail yet - hopefully this weekend...


Martin

--

From: Steve Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 

Linux-Networking Digest #969

1999-01-22 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #969, Volume #9  Fri, 22 Jan 99 15:13:25 EST

Contents:
  Re: slow network when connected with internet (Francesc Guasch)
  Re: Hi, (Tom)
  Re: Linux server on small network (Lee)
  YP-client and SuSE6.0 Problem (Thomas Stieler)
  Re: NFS Trouble (Chris Schwarz)
  DNS problem with linux gateway (Nortel)
  Re: Ethernet connection not working (Francesc Guasch)
  Re: PPP doesn't work when eth0 is active ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Wardialer War Dialer WARDIALER WARDIAL windows95 windows98 (Matthias Warkus)
  The answer to your Cable Modem problems (okdj)
  Re: Firewall or IPMasq or Both: Need Recommendation (Matt Kressel)



From: Francesc Guasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: slow network when connected with internet
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:30:39 +0100

Francesc Guasch wrote:
 
 Hi I have a linux server with samba for a small network.
 Once in a while it connects to internet with for mailing
 and webbing.
 When it happens, the internal network slows a lot.
 It takes a lng time to establish a connection with
 the server when the ppp is loaded.

I searched the web but It still doesn't work, please, check
what I've done because I think I'm missing a little thing I
just can find  ( I've been trying hard but I'm not very smart)

- I have added a entry in /etc/hosts the PCs in the network.
- I checked hostname and domainname so they contain my own domain,
that only exists inside.
- I have not a DNS server running inside.
- I have this in my /etc/resolv.conf ( nothing else )
nameserver 147.83.2.3  # my real name server.

It still happens: when I do a ping to a computer inside
it first tries to verify the name in the DNS.
When It's not in internet it returns instantly because
it can't reach the network.
I guess I must tell that first look /etc/hosts before
trying DNS but I don't know how. I checked the resolver
man unsuccessfully.

please please, I'm about to get it , I can feel it .. 8)
-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.etsetb.upc.es/~frankie
 ^-^.-, 
 o o _ ) Errors, like straws, upon the surface flow;
  Y (_, (__(Ssss He who would search for pearls must dive below.

--

From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux,comp.security.unix,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.security.firewalls,comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Hi,
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:27:36 -0500

Umm I think you should know that logging a username and ipaddress
at a certain time and point is and has been going on at many ISP's
large and small for many years now

For instance, using radius, which alot of ISP's use, that gives you the date,
username, ipaddress used., their connect and disconnect times.

Tom

Steve Romero wrote:

 If you can get this guys IP he may be easier to catch than you would think.  A
 lot of serious ISPs are starting to implement a new version of Cisco Secure
 Access Server that logs usernames as they acquire an ip address when dialing
 into a modem pool.

 z Remko wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I am setting up a network server in a student home. This server, a linux
  redhat with apache, is connected to a firewall to the internet..
  I had some problems lately and found out that someone is trieing to hack
  his way into my system...
  His atack is diferent everytime..
  Now my guestion is...
 
  How can i test my system myselve..
  I have one computer that is not behind the fire wall so i can hack
  myselve in my own system-computer to test the fire wall.
  A am lurning a lot but it is not easy, never told it was easy...
  For me it is a project to get it running wihout problems, i was
  managing  ok sofar, until mister hacker came along.
 
  I tried to get some programs. But most of the time hard to get..
 
  Does anyone have some programs or links to programs that test ports,
  sniff, maybe test ipspoofing problems, programs running on a port i
  forgot about... Just a program that looks for holes...
 
  Does something like that exist?
  What do you recomend...
  Maybe you can send it to me...
 
  Thanks a lot..
 
  Remko..
 
  By the way is there a way to stop a hacker trieing?
 

 
Remko Leupen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Remko Leupen
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  HTML Mail
  Netscape Conference Address
  Netscape Conference DLS Server
Additional Information:
Last Name Leupen
First NameRemko
Version   2.1


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Linux server on small network
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 21:15:30 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Taylor" writes:

 I've just put a new network together at home it's only 3PC's but it does
 what I 

Linux-Networking Digest #970

1999-01-22 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #970, Volume #9  Fri, 22 Jan 99 19:13:51 EST

Contents:
  Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Duncan Simpson)
  Re: diald problem (Matt Kressel)
  PPP setup/minicom ("News")
  Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS ("Cameron Spitzer")
  Re: httpd (Joseph)
  Re: Connect without hub (Criss Hyde)
  ipfwadm -- ipchains rules? (Brian)
  Re: kernel: VFS: No free inodes - contact Linus (Matt Corddry)
  Yikes!!! Bogons!!! (Tom Reinertson)
  Re: DNS problem with IP Masq Gateway (David Moulton)
  Re: pppd gurus - help, please! (Clifford Kite)
  callin in to my machine... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux? ("Alexander")
  Re: Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS (Ah Clem)
  Ethernet address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  No dial tone. PPP. Redhat5.2 (Kaustav Bhattacharya)
  Re: Connect without hub (Criss Hyde)
  PPP Script for RedHat Linux ("Killer")
  Re: Q: Network Linux and OpenDOS ? (Richard Hector)
  Re: Compiling ppp-2.3.5 under kernel 2.0.34 (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Any program conver text file to g3 format file ? (Dirk Ruediger)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duncan Simpson)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.security,comp.security.unix,redhat.general,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: 22 Jan 1999 20:31:08 GMT

In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Cover) writes:

[stuff snipped]
I've seen the same thing in RHL 5.1's mountd. The cracker we saw used it
to gain root by using the Linux root kit available at rootshell.com. I say
cracker, but he turned out to be more of a script kiddie. I think the flaw
is described in CERT advisory CA-98.12.mountd. It's sort of a Pandora's
box after they are in, because the root kit replaces several binaries in 
order to help avoid detection, such as find, inetd, login, passwd, syslog,
and many more. 


You can detect these with a number of programs. Try tripwire (the free
version or the non-free version) and check-ps (free software with
detials at http://checkps.alcom.co.uk). Combinations are quite
feasable and recommended.

The mountd buffer overrun is a known bug and I think an exploit and
fix information appeared to bugtraq (using the same shell code as all
the other exploits...). RH fixed the bug a few days after the report
on bugtraq.

Duncan (-:



--

From: Matt Kressel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diald problem
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:25:25 GMT

Emmett Pate wrote:
 
 I've been using diald on RH5.1 for about 5 months now and have it
 basically working pretty well.  However, I seem to have one recurring
 problem that I can't quite get solved.  There seems to be instances
 that cause the link to stay up that I can't explain.
 
 I tracked down an earlier situation that seemed to be caused by not
 running 'routed'.  By running 'routed', the diald standard.filter
 rules were reliably able to ignore 'route' requests.  Now it appears
 that if I use a browser (NS4.5) I continue to see 'http' requests from
 a remote address *to* my address even after I exit the browser.
 Incidentally, this doesn't seem to happen if I use a browser on a
 Windows machine that uses the Linux box as a gateway.  I haven't been
 able to find a specific site that will cause this.  I usually just
 fire up Netscape and hit a couple of Yahoo categories, DejaNews, and
 the Netscape homepage.  Then I exit the browser and watch the output
 of 'tcpdump' and /var/log/messages (with diald debugging level 31).
 
 I'm also using 'named' as a caching nameserver and will occasionally
 see ongoing ".domain" requests even after exiting the browser.  They
 don't seem to keep the link up, however, without some other rule match
 (like tcp or www packets).
 
 Any help on interpreting the output of 'tcpdump' and/or the diald
 debugging output would be greatly appreciated.


Firstly, look at the /usr/lib/diald/standard.filter and see what rules
you have and configure them for your settings.  Secondly, NS 4.5
occasionally leaves a stale process around after exiting that makes
these requests (this is a bug that I hope gets fixed :) ).  If you see
the problem recurr, do a "ps" to see if the stale netscape(s) are
there.  Usually they are in parentheses.  Just kill them.

-Matt


-- 
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-  Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY -+
+-  TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 +

--

From: "News" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP setup/minicom
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 15:27:33 -0500

Just installed linux 5.0 on dual boot machine.  I am trying to get PPP
working using the following references: 10 min guide to ppp,(my pppd and
kernel version match) and Linux ppp help.
Needless to say I can't get it to work.  My first problem is in minicom.
when I dial 

Linux-Networking Digest #971

1999-01-22 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #971, Volume #9  Fri, 22 Jan 99 21:13:40 EST

Contents:
  login delay on all ports ("Thomas Hartwig")
  Re: Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS (Paul Schmehl)
  Re: pppd gurus - help, please! (David T. Blake)
  Re: more samba problems (David Kirkpatrick)
  weird ftp problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux vs WIN NT (Johnny Icon)
  Re: Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS (Peter Seebach)
  Re: I need a good proxy server (Darren Greer)
  Re: Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS ("Clifton T. 
Sharp Jr.")
  Re: pppd gurus - help, please! (Herbie van Tetering)
  Re: How to find Docs on setting up POP3 on Redhat 5.2 ("Charles Stack")
  Re: Linux-Linux networking problem (Jesse Hughes)
  Re: How to find Docs on setting up POP3 on Redhat 5.2 (Richard Hyde)
  dhcp does not work with linux 2.2.0-final??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Doug DeJulio)
  Re: ping self ("hieninger")
  Re: [Q]Sendmail 8.91 and relaying (Andrzej Filip)
  Re: Redhat Linux 5.2 Sendmail slow to authenticate sender address ("Valery 
Zamarayev")



From: "Thomas Hartwig" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: login delay on all ports
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:30:57 +0100

system: RedHat 5.1

I run a network server for serveral purposes.
When I try to connect on serveral ports, eg. 80 and 110 the server delays
for about 3 seconds up to 10 seconds:

$ telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Connected xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Escape character is '^]'.

~~~

Then the port is open and there is no problem with connectivity. The host is
running with serveral
virtual IPs, the machine from I connect is known to DNS and "/etc/hosts".
I think this is a matter of "tcpd", but I don't how to trace/debug his
doings and where it lacks?

Thanks for every hint
Thomas




--

From: TINLC#[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Schmehl)
Crossposted-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Subject: Re: Bad Sendmails with otherwise good OSes, Re: Open relays on DNS
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 22:21:03 GMT
Reply-To: TINLC#[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 22 Jan 1999 20:35:01 GMT, "Cameron Spitzer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
felt it essential to add to the discussion:

[snip]

Unfortunately, a lot of those $3 disks also install Sendmail 8.8
configured as an open relay.  Red Hat 5.1 is one such product.
Word hasn't gotten out as widely about this problem.

Older Sun and SGI boxes have the same problem.  People are "retiring"
them to DNS and leaving the broken Sendmails running.

This is not such a bad thing.  When the spammers find them, they'll go
in ORBS.  The site will be notified, but their *real* mail server (and
therefore their mail service) will have been unaffected.

http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ (Paul Schmehl)
Technical Support Services Manager
University of Texas at Dallas
Texas resident.  Don't mess with Texas.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David T. Blake)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: pppd gurus - help, please!
Date: 21 Jan 1999 09:20:00 -0800

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite) writes:

Richard R Urena ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: My problem: after the modem connects and pppd starts up,
: it dies after 10 seconds, without having established
: a connection.

: Here's the very short output on the system log:

:[ chat script to dial, etc. ]

: Jan 20 18:45:48 sebastian chat[1221]: CONNECT -- got it 
: Jan 20 18:45:48 sebastian chat[1221]: send (^M) 
: Jan 20 18:45:48 sebastian pppd[1217]: Serial connection established.
: Jan 20 18:45:49 sebastian pppd[1217]: Using interface ppp0
: Jan 20 18:45:49 sebastian pppd[1217]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/modem
: Jan 20 18:45:58 sebastian pppd[1217]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
: Jan 20 18:45:58 sebastian pppd[1217]: Modem hangup
: Jan 20 18:45:58 sebastian pppd[1217]: Connection terminated.
: Jan 20 18:45:58 sebastian pppd[1217]: Exit.

Best guess at this point would be to replace the chat expect/send
CONNECT '' (or CONNECT "" with CONNECT \\c.  This might have
to be CONNECT "\\c" depending on how the script is implemented and
read.  Instead of the send (^M) above you should get send () since
the carriage return is suppressed.

Yes, this is a common problem, and one that is solved trivially
by minicom. You can connect by hand, so do it, and record
the responses and order of responses sent by your ISP.
Some send "Username: "
Some send "Login: "
...

Then go to the chat script (I believe it is ppp-on-dialer)
and verify that the chat uses the correct strings.

Then you ought to be okelly-dokelly.

Make sure resolv.conf is set also.

If minicom works, then it's not of family winmodem.

Good point.

-- 
Dave Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: David Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: more samba problems
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 19:13:34 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Linux-Networking Digest #978

1999-01-23 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #978, Volume #9  Sat, 23 Jan 99 18:13:32 EST

Contents:
  Re: IPCHAINS package - where is it ? (Mark Hahn)
  Samba Setup (Scallica)
  Kernel Mailing List ("Jose Antonio C. Baduria, Jr.")
  LINUX, 3COM ImpactIQ, ISDN, etc, etc, etc... (Keith Tucker)
  Re: demand dialing with pppd ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
  Re: Networking problem -SOS (autodata)
  Re: Getting through the masquerade? (Daniel Wilson)
  A trip down memory lane... ("Nick Sharratt")
  Re: ipfwadm forwarding versus paired input/output rules (Bernd Eckenfels)
  Re: TCP wrappers busted my mountd? ("Steven J. Hathaway")
  ppp-server problem ("tim")
  Re: Newbie: question about for kernel update for PCI NE2000 Redhat4.2 (Tobias Frech)
  Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server (James Wenger)
  Re: Setting up RH 5.2 for ip_forwarding (Tommy Wareing)
  Re: DHCP and DNS (again) ("Steven J. Hathaway")



From: Mark Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPCHAINS package - where is it ?
Date: 23 Jan 1999 20:09:17 GMT

 I'm searching for the IPCHAINS package - I got to
 http://www.adelaide.net.au/~rustcorp/ipfwchains/ipfwchains.html but all the
 links from there appear to be broken. I've also scanned various archive
 sites as well with no luck. Can someone provider a pointer ?

a little guessing yeilds:
  ftp://ftp.starshadow.com/pub/rustcorp/ipchains/

I infer that Paul Russell tried to move the tree to a US web site,
which appears to be less than functional...

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scallica)
Subject: Samba Setup
Date: 23 Jan 1999 20:56:01 GMT


Hey,

I have Samba 2.0 running on Redhat 5.2. I can see my computer in Network
Neighborhood in Win 95, but I cannot see any of my shares. I defined them
properly in my smb.conf file. I am not sure what else to do. Any suggestions?
Thanx.

--

From: "Jose Antonio C. Baduria, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kernel Mailing List
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 08:20:59 +

Hello,

Does anyone know how to be part of the Kernel Mailing List. I have
been waiting for the release of
Linux 2.2 and would like to be informed about it.

Thanks


--

From: Keith Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LINUX, 3COM ImpactIQ, ISDN, etc, etc, etc...
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 15:20:21 -0600

OK, I am going to take the plunge into ISDN land.  I want to be able to
set up my Linux (2.0.30) box to have a connection to my ISP through a
3COM ImpactIQ external TA (connected to a on-board serial port), and use
the linux box as a WEB server, POP 3 server, as well as a masquerading
box for a couple of other Windoze machines connected to it through
ETHERNET.  I am also planning to use the 3COM TA to provide my voice
lines in the house.  I was going to use a PIPELINE 75, but my ISP that I
plan to use recommended against it saying that they use 3COM equipment
and they have had not to good results with the Ascend stuff.  Anyway,
after reading several posts on this NG, I have come to the conclusion
that getting the 3COM unit to work with Linux using mlppp is somewhat
iffy.  I would appreciate any advice, criticism, help, whatever, about
doing this from people who have experience doing this with the
aforementioned stuff.  If anyone can point me to any good documentation,
that would be great.  Thanks in advance.


Keith Tucker

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: demand dialing with pppd
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 13:42:28 -0800

Demand dialing requires pppd version 2.3.5

Juergen Fiedler wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I have Slackware 3.6 with pppd 2.2, pl 0. I set my ppp connection up
 with pppsetup. This created a ppp-up file that takes a -d option to run
 pppd in dial-on-demand mode.
 In that mode, pppd uses the following option file:
 
 ---SNIP---
 lock
 defaultroute
 noipdefault
 modem
 /dev/cua1
 57600
 crtscts
 debug
 passive
 asyncmap 0
 name "abcdefg"
 ipcp-accept-local
 ipcp-accept-remote
 0.0.0.0:10.10.10.10
 demand
 connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/pppscript"
 ---SNIP---
 
 Now, if I run 'ppp-go -d', pppd complains about an unknown command
 'demand' - and probably rightfully so, since this option is not
 mentioned in the pppd documentation. Is there a newer version of pppd
 that would support this option. Or am I completely on the wrong track?
 Should I just forget it and try to set up diald?
 
 TIA,
 Juergen

--

From: autodata [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networking problem -SOS
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 10:18:00 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thomas:

Check out ...

http://www.eunuchs.org/linux/samba.html

... this is an excellent article. There are only two things it does not
address:
1. a change you must make to your /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb. (change the line
daemon nmbd -D
  to..
daemon nmbd -D 

Linux-Networking Digest #979

1999-01-23 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #979, Volume #9  Sat, 23 Jan 99 20:13:46 EST

Contents:
  Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections? (Edd Stanley)
  Re:  Subscribe me to this newsgroup  (Mark Cooperstein)
  Interface Activating and Deactivating ("Daniel Goh")
  LinkSys (RYBCZYNSKI GREGORY)
  Re: Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections? (Benjohn007)
  remote access to a samba server (Andy Skunza)
  Re: Samba Setup (Benjohn007)
  Re: Multiple 3c509 (Sandy Culver)
  NFS Problems ("Don Cook")
  Re: I need a good proxy server ("Glen Parker")
  Re: rc.firewall.ipchains causes slow connections (Ron Forrester)
  Re: Boot Rom (Stefan Nehlsen)
  Re: DynIp and Linux (Benjohn007)
  Samba 2.0 and Kerel 2.2-final (Nazeeh Amin)
  Re: Printing on EPSON Stylus 740 very slow (Bob Tennent)
  Re: Slower ppp connect time with Linux than with  Windows95? (Dan Birchall)
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: Linux-Linux networking problem (Jesse Hughes)
  Cable Modem US Robotics VSP Plus ("VTR News")
  Re: rc.local question ("Glen Parker")
  Re: Samba over the internet (joey smith)
  Re: 3c509 irq  inn News Server (Peter Hernberg)
  Re: How do I access mails in Outlook on Linux ("Marc Abrams")
  deadlock of Linux ("Erich Weber")
  Re: kill connection (Haaino Beljaars)
  Re: remote access to a samba server (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Linux Dial Upon Demand Internet Server (Mark Roberts)
  Re: IPCHAINS package - where is it ? ("Hervey Wilson")



From: Edd Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet Adapter Accepting Connections?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:52:25 -0500

I am trying to connect my WIN95 machine and my Linux machine on an
ethernet but I am not able
to Ping, telnet or ftp from either machine to the other. I just wanted
to find out if there is
anyway to diagnose whether or not the Linux ethernet adapter is allowing
connections...

When I do an ifconfig I get this:
==
loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:3584  Metric:1
  RX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  Collisions:0

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:AA:00:1B:2E:41
  inet addr:0.27.46.29  Bcast:0.27.46.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:53 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  Collisions:0
  Interrupt:3 Base address:0x270
==
and my rc.inet1 file is set up like this:
==
#! /bin/sh
#
# rc.inet1 This shell script boots up the base INET system.
#
# Version: @(#)/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 1.01 05/27/93
#

HOSTNAME=`cat /etc/HOSTNAME`

# Attach the loopback device.
/sbin/ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
/sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 lo

# Edit for your setup.
IPADDR="0.27.46.29"
NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
NETWORK="0.27.46.0"
BROADCAST="0.27.46.255"
GATEWAY="0.27.46.1"

# Uncomment the line below to configure your ethernet card.
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} broadcast ${BROADCAST} netmask ${NETMASK}

# Uncomment these to set up your IP routing table.
/sbin/route add -net ${NETWORK} netmask ${NETMASK} eth0
if [ ! "$GATEWAY" = "" ]; then
 /sbin/route add default gw ${GATEWAY} netmask 0.0.0.0 metric 1
fi

# End of rc.inet1
==

I just wonder why the heck I can't ping Linux from the WIN machine. Both
lights on the hub are
on and I have the /etc/resolv.conf , /etc/host.conf and the /etc/hosts
files all set up. I even
checked out the /proc/net/dev and it gave me this:
Inter-|   Receive  |  Transmit
 face |packets errs drop fifo frame|packets errs drop fifo colls carrier

lo: 730000   73000 00
  eth0:1580000   53000 00


What should I do?

THANKS!!!
Edd




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re:  Subscribe me to this newsgroup 
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 22:05:38 GMT

In article 78d4nj$b2m$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Temp Account 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish to subscribe on this newsgroup
Please put me your list.
Thanks a lot.

Donnie.

Easy enough done.  Subscription is free, but there is an initial sign up 
charge.  Please send $10 (US) to:

linux.networking Subscription
PO Box 12498
Spring Valley,  NY 10977

**  Remove ".nospam" when replying or email will bounce back to you...

--

From: "Daniel Goh" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Interface Activating and Deactivating
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 21:40:57 

Linux-Networking Digest #982

1999-01-24 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #982, Volume #9  Sun, 24 Jan 99 02:13:46 EST

Contents:
  Re: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument [SOLVED (I think)] (Villy Kruse)
  Re: How to print on a Apple networkprinter? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Caching nameserver under Linux with Masquerading... ("Steven J. Hill")
  Re: PPP/SLIP/Null Modem Connection Help (Rob van der Putten)
  2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Darren Ford)
  Re: deadlock of Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: ip masquerading and icq (Mike Patterson)
  Re: remote access to a samba server (Matt Kressel)
  Re: CHATSCRIPT Fails (Julian Bordas)
  Connecting to Internet? ("Beetle")
  Re: running X on a remote server (Athan)
  Re: Mgetty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: VPN  IP Masq ("Roman Spitzbart")
  Re: Firewall or IPMasq or Both: Need Recommendation ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DNS problem with linux gateway (David Jordan)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument [SOLVED (I think)]
Date: 22 Jan 1999 19:47:21 +0100

In article 789mle$3js$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew Duchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I did to get rid of the "SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument" when
starting networking manually via '/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start eth0'
on my RH 5.1 linux box:

The problem, as someone on the group suggested (thanks!  although I
didn't see it immediately), is (I think) due to a bogus default gateway
being defined for device lo.  Below I provide the "detective work"
and below the solution.


Undefine the following variables in the file below GATEWAYDEV GATEWAY
That would be the proper way.

::
/etc/sysconfig/network
::
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=no
HOSTNAME=xx.xx.xx.xx.nl
GATEWAYDEV=
GATEWAY=

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to print on a Apple networkprinter?
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:48:42 GMT

In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],  Thomas
Jostock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 I use Suse 5.3 and have installed netatalk and afpfs for networking with
 MACs in our Appletalk network. Everything works fine but I have no idea
 how to print on our Apple laserprinter. The netatalk HOWTO didn't help me
 in that point. Does anyone have experience in printing using Appletalk?
 tsch=FCss
 =09Thomas=20

I'm trying to do this very thing.  I have Redhat5.1 and have installed
netatalk+asun.  Using the nbplkup tool, I am able to list all of the AppleTalk
devices available on the network.  Using, pap, I try to print a file from my
Linux host to a LaserWriter IIg. But I receive errors from the printer itself.
Once I have success printing to the printer from Linux, I plan to build a
print-queue so I can print jobs from Windows 95, too.  Any experiences will be
valuable.  Thanks in advance.

Phil Burns
MD, USA


 ---
  Thomas Jostock=20
  I. Med. Klinik der =20
  Johannes Gutenberg Universitaet =20
  Abt. Pathophysiologie   =20
  Obere Zahlbacher Str. 63
  D-55101 Mainz =20
 ---
 E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 WWW:  http://homer.medizin.uni-mainz.de




= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: "Steven J. Hill" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Caching nameserver under Linux with Masquerading...
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 23:20:45 -0600

I recently got my caching nameserver working for the most part under Linux. I
have only one problem remaining. I have one Linux box that is my firewall and
my modem is hooked up to it. I also have the caching nameserver running on it.
I have a second Linux box that I do all my stuff on, surf, etc. Netscape has
no problems with DNS queries, however, I cannot use 'nslookup' it always says:

*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.10.1: Non-existent host/domain
*** Default servers are not available

Below is are resolver configuration files. Could someone please explain why
I am having such a difficult time? And YES, I read the Linux DNS HOWTO. Thanks.

-Steve

'resolov.conf'
domain sjh.net
nameserver 192.168.10.1


'host.conf'
order hosts,bind
trim sjh.net.

--

From: Rob van der Putten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PPP/SLIP/Null Modem Connection Help
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:04:44 +0100

Hi there


On 17 Jan 1999, Brian McCauley wrote:

 That looks like a standard null-modem cable to me.  What do "most"
 look like then?

All sorts of wierd stuff.

   The screen of the cable should be connected (soldered) to the connector 
   shell at both ends of the cable.
 Both?  I thought that was not recommeded.

I know it is not recommended. I just don't agree with the 

Linux-Networking Digest #987

1999-01-24 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #987, Volume #9  Sun, 24 Jan 99 10:17:06 EST

Contents:
  re: net commands ("joel n. eusebio")
  Re: cant get Samba to work right ("Glenn Davy")
  Re: help setting up ethernet card in redhat 5.2 (Howard Mann)
  Re: PLEASE HELP ? (Josh Rusko)
  Re: Proxy server ("Andreas Hofer")
  Re: Setting Server Name (Alexander Knyazev)
  inetd (Loren Brookes)
  BocaLAN card problems (remove Q to reply (Robert W. Wiskow))
  Re: Longshine Pocket LAN adapter (Richard Hector)
  Re: Wacky shutdown prob... (Loren Brookes)
  wu ftpd and memory caching... ("Kid Velvet")
  Re: kill connection ("minstrel")
  Why would X not work after istalling a NIC? (Darren Ford)
  Re: Home Network Guidance - Please ("Robert C. Paulsen, Jr.")
  Re: Desktop IP-Masquerading for a Laptop (Ron Forrester)
  Re: Routing problems with Ethernet (Jim Hicks)
  Re: Home Network Guidance - Please ("Rob Lauer")
  Re: LINUX, 3COM ImpactIQ, ISDN, etc, etc, etc... (David Heinzinger)
  Re: Sending a file to a remote machine's port (Miguel Cruz)
  Re: Remote IP Problem ("Forest Gump")
  Re: FTP and firewalls (Leon Harris)
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (John Wolanski)
  Problem w/ DEC205 (ewrk3) net card - eth0  (probe ok but not ping) ("Glenn")
  networkking problem (Nick Rout)
  Lightnux, the slim Linux ("Pascal Ferrari")
  Radius keeps dying ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  help samba - Gethostbyaddr failed for 90.0.0.4 ("Ann Harris")



From: "joel n. eusebio" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: net commands
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:10:25 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How can I configure my linux box so that net commands from a windows
workstations can pass trough the linux machine.when I execute
net view or other net commands it does not see the remote machine. Ive
tried this on a diffrent network and my target was the same remote
machine and it worked fine...

any suggestions will be greatly appreciated


--

From: "Glenn Davy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cant get Samba to work right
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:24:15 +1100

. My win95 doesnt see linux as a
 server
Quick question for you. When you say this, does this mean that it doesn't
appear in network neighbourhood? If so I've _often_ found on MSnetworks that
I have to right click on network neighbourhood and use find computer to find
the server.  If this doesn't help email me a copy of smb.conf
Glenn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: Howard Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help setting up ethernet card in redhat 5.2
Date: 24 Jan 1999 03:35:03 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (XUnKoWnX1) writes:
 i do not know how to setup my card, i have looked over the for a while now, i
 have it setup in win 98, its a PnP driver. Please Help

Here you go...

1. http://www.suse.de/Support/sdb_e/rb_isapnp.html

2. 
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/RHL-5.2-Manual/install-guide/manual/doc062.html#s8.1.4.6

Cheers,


-- 
Howard Mann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xmission.com/~howardm
(a LINUX website for newbies)

--

From: Josh Rusko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 22:26:18 -0500

ummm...hit the "Print Screen" key on your keyboard. now open your favorite
image editor, photoshop or whatever, and hit crtl-V, or "Paste" under the
"Edit" menu
now save it as a jpeg

QCT wrote:

 dear friend,

 First I am sorry because my message post in a wrong group. Because this
 group is my lovely group and in hurry time I can not find which group
 should I post my question.

 My boss want me to make images file from desktop screens. Is there any
 free software or any way convert any windows 95 screen into a image
 file( jpg). I did this way, print out and scan that paper. But my Boss
 don't like that way because it take so long to finish all the designs (
 around 2 million images, and color printer is so slow).

 Could some one have any idea please help me !

 Thank you very much,
 QCT


--

From: "Andreas Hofer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proxy server
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 03:41:59 GMT

If it just web browsing, just set the options in Netscape to use a proxy
server and set for the appropriate ip and port. Telnet and other protocols
would be trickier. Ideally, you should be using the linux box as a gateway
with ip forwarding. There's more security and stability.

Louis Canale wrote in message 78e063$jqq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Is there a way to have linux access the internet through MSProxy?  I
recently connected linux to a NT network which already has MSproxy
installed
I was hoping to use it.  thanks

Louis





--

From: Alexander Knyazev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Setting Server Name
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 10:43:58 -0700

Hi!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have RedHat Linux 5.1. I 

Linux-Networking Digest #988

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #988, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 02:13:42 EST

Contents:
  Palm III Network via HotSync Cradle (Bill Pitz)
  Re: diald -not replacing default route (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: eth0: The transmission stopped! (Bill Cripe)
  Re: FTP server? ("Eugene")
  Re: help samba - Gethostbyaddr failed for 90.0.0.4 (Malware)
  Re: Networking two linux machines ("Eugene")
  diald won't connect ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  What could "modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17" be? (Jeffrey T Kowalczyk)
  Running Xterm from another Linux box on the network ("Mike Drummond")
  Re: Win95-Linux VPN (Dai to)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (B. vonEschen)
  Test - please ignore ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (John Wolanski)
  NT4SP3 + SBS breaks linux proxy server? (Corey Hauer)
  Re: Networking two linux machines (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: diald won't connect ("K.A. Steensma")
  Re: Win95-Linux VPN (Edwin Calimbo)
  samba woes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: ftp upload: permissions question (Hugo Villeneuve)
  Re: Running Xterm from another Linux box on the network (Hugh McCurdy)
  Re: Cable Modem problems (Clayton Summers)
  Re: Road Runner (John Wolanski)
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Richard Steiner)
  Re: home ne's ork - setup. (David Kirkpatrick)
  NT RAS callback for Linux - Solved!! ( using mschap ) (Diederick van Dijk)



From: Bill Pitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.palmtops.pilot
Subject: Palm III Network via HotSync Cradle
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 23:14:34 GMT

Hi:

I was wondering if it is possible to access the network with the Palm
III via the serial interface on the HotSync Cradle.  I have tried out
the "Palm Redirector" program, but it doesn't quite do what I want.
Here is what would be the optimum solution:

Connect cradle to serial port of Linux system.
Run PPP over serial link and provide transparent routed internet access
(which the machine is already doing for several ethernet workstations)
I have also been able to create a link like this via a null-modem cable
between two Linux PC's.  I have (so far) been able to get the Palm III
to act as a serial terminal onto one of the Linux PC's, which is what
leads me to believe it's possible to run PPP over the link.  In fact, I
*know* it is possible -- the big question is what software do I need on
the Palm III to do a direct link with PPP?

Basically it would work just like the dialup access which I have already
been able to use, only it would eliminate the actual modem interfacing.


--

From: David Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: diald -not replacing default route
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 17:05:39 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is our default route open for ppp0 to use or is ie specified 
somewhere?  It should be available. 
dizzy wrote:
 
 when I request a service such as telnet my provider in /etc/hosts it
 triggers diald and sucessfully dials up gives me a local IP and remote
 IP
 then states
 "ppp not replacing existing default route to sl0"
  "connect script timed out. Killing script"
 Ive tried to add an IP address in route.conf but it dosent seem to make
 any difference
 apparently its looking for a replacement route for serial line 0. AFAIK
 this is a ficticioous device linking to ppp.
 I do have slip running when dials starts slip keep alive
 can someone shed some light to my delimmna?
 This is on SuSE 5.3 and Ive posted to their list but nada
 this is driving me nuts!!
 I spent most of the morning serching deja news but diddnt come upp with
 any answers.
 many thanks
 rob
 
 Linux Home page http://www.connix.com/~dizzy73/LBM.htm

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: Bill Cripe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0: The transmission stopped!
Date: 25 Jan 1999 00:54:15 GMT

David Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:   It looks like the error message was - transmitter -  not
: transmission.  Could you verify that?  

First, David is correct, it was in fact transmitter, not transmission.

I just thought that I'd follow up on my own post now that I have things
working. Perhaps this will help someone someday. I finally figured
out the problem by digging through Deja News and a few other web
sites, so thanks to all those folks who posted in the past. Here's
what was going on:
   A Netgear FX310TX ethernet card may have one of several different
chips in it depending on its age and a number of other factors. There
is a good chance that the tulip.c driver which comes in your Linux
distribution will work IF the chip actually is a "Digital". If it is
it will be printed on the chip. Even if it is Digital there is some
chance that you 

Linux-Networking Digest #989

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #989, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 03:13:59 EST

Contents:
  Debian ("Peter Kripner")
  Re: networkking problem (Nick Rout)
  diald help. (tony mollica)
  IPX over PPP - need another route (Victor Sturgeon)
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Edwin Calimbo)
  From a Virtual Server to a Colocate ("Mr. Poet")
  need help? ("Scott Chu")
  Re: networkking problem (John Wolanski)
  Re: Terminators and thinnet ("Mark Medici")
  Re: setting up cable modem (Clayton Summers)
  Re: IP Masq  Civ 2 MPE (Dan Kegel)
  policy editor questions... ("Andrew C. Ohnstad")
  Masquerade and Static IP number ? (QCT)
  Redhat and 3com ethernet XL ("Joost van der Eijk")
  NFS times out (was Re: Slow to connect, but then OK) (Ben Sandler)
  Re: Win98 + Linux (samba) (kdoswald)
  LCP problem with PPPD! (Andrew Tierney)
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Lawrence Harris)
  Re: Second NIC (Clayton Summers)
  Re: LCP problem with PPPD! (chaz)
  Re: ip masquerading and icq ("Rogers News")



From: "Peter Kripner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 06:46:22 +0100

Hallo, ein Freund hat ein Netzwerkproblem leider kann ich ihm auch nicht
helfen
Ich hab hier 2 Netzwerkkarten neu eingebaut, beide PCI (3C900 + 3C905)
sollten auch supportet werden, werden nur am anfang nie erkannt, und darum
kann ich sie auch nicht einstellen  bei /proc/pci sind die beide
aufgefuehrt ??
Gruß
Peter



--

From: Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: networkking problem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 19:02:23 +1300

DEVICE=eth0
IPADDR=192.168.0.3
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=192.168.0.0
BROADCAST=192.168.0.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none

John Wolanski wrote:

 What have you done for your network settings?  What are the contents of
 this file:

 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0

 Nick Rout wrote:
  RH 5.0 Intel with ne2000 clone card. When the network is going up I get
  an error like this
  Error:netmask: Unknown host
  /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-post:[:too many argumants
  usage : /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-routes (net device)

 --
 -John Wolanski
 Remove the "_removethis" from my email address to reply.




--

From: tony mollica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diald help.
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:12:21 +

Hi.  I have a working diald setup on a Debian2.0
box but there are a couple of messages in the log
that I can't seem to find a solution to.  The items
are logged when the link comes down.  These are
the lines with my comments added:

: Closing down idle link;no problem here
: Terminating on signal 2   ;can't find a reference
;for this.
: Connection terminated ;no problem here either
: Failed;what failed?
: disconnect script failed  ;can't seem to get any 
;disconnect script to work.
;Any suggestions?
: Exit. ;OK.
: Delaying 10 seconds before clear to dial.
 
   I changed a parameter to make it 10 seconds between
   redials, but why does diald end it's session with 
   this line, which makes you wait 10 seconds before 
   dialing a new connection?

Diald has been working for about two weeks with no
problems, but these messages seem to indicate that
something is not right.  

Any suggestions?

thanks, 
-- 

tony mollica
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: Victor Sturgeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPX over PPP - need another route
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:31:16 -0600

OK so far I have been able to set up a RedHat 5.2 ppp server. I can dial
in with tcp/ip and ipx (thanks to
http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/index.shtml, and Valentin Abramov).

However my problem now is getting the ipx packets routed via the linux
server to the network, esp. the novell servers. I have tried ipxripd,
but I cant get it to compile under the libraries in RedHat 5.2.

Is there another ipx routing dameon or another solution.

I also need some info on getting SAMBA to work accross a ppp connection.
As usual any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks.



--
Victor Sturgeon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Calimbo)
Subject: Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong?
Date: 25 Jan 99 05:26:49 GMT

Darren Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Folks,  I am about to go crazy here with problems.   I have two machines
: both running Red Hat 5.0.  Both have NICs and are recognized during the
: boot process.  I reinstalled Red Hat on both machines to get a fresh
: start.  During the install I chose to set up networking for each
: machine.
: I want machine one(M1) to be able to connect to a cable modem later on
: so I want it as a gateway.

: M1(linux1.blank.net)  M2(linux2.blank.net)
: IP  = 

Linux-Networking Digest #990

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #990, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 06:13:35 EST

Contents:
  Help... Internet Sharing (kdoswald)
  Re: 
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=BD=D0=B0=DDRH5=2E2=A4=E4=B4=A9=AD=FE=A8=C7=BCt=B5P=AA=BANetwork?=  
(Someone)
  Re: S.u.S.E. 5.3  ISDN  PPP: pppd not functioning! ("news.nacamar.de")
  ftp over modem line stalls at 100% : why??? (Neil Zanella)
  Does ICQ and Yahoo Chess work with IP Masq? (James)
  Re: pppd error - tcgetattr: Input/output error(5) (Matthias Kattanek)
  limiting ehternet bandwidth (Guido Dolci)
  Re: AutoPPP and pppd server (Matthias Kattanek)
  Re: Palm III Network via HotSync Cradle (Bruce Thompson)
  Re: No dial tone. PPP. Redhat5.2 (Kaustav Bhattacharya)
  Re: PPP MSCHAP and NT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Newbie PPP Setup - RH5.1 (David Kirkpatrick)
  How to make DTR allways Active !!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? ("Thomas Chai")
  Re: Ether broke in Linux, still works in Win98?!? ("Thomas Chai")
  Re: RH5.2 Dual NIC Startup Troubles ("Thomas Chai")
  /etc/host.conf and /etc/nsswitch.conf (Vichharaks ROS)
  Re: help samba - Gethostbyaddr failed for 90.0.0.4 (Villy Kruse)
  Re: FTP server? (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: linux crashes on nfs and sound!!! (Bob)
  Re: Redhat and 3com ethernet XL (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: kill connection (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: policy editor questions... (Jeff Hutchinson)
  Re: Newbie PPP question (Villy Kruse)



From: kdoswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help... Internet Sharing
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:53:53 -0800

 I have a question.. I am going to help a friend of mine setup a
group of computers up on the internet through a dsl line.  Basicaly the
business is getting 5 IP address's.. To put simply going to use those 5
for teh machines that will actualy be running web server and so on... on

the internet.  But there is 3 other computers that are just going to be
web browsing and the cost of adding more IP address's basicaly doubles
are monthly cost.  So we do not want to do that, on a very low budget.
So I was wondering can I use IP Masquerading to share the internet along

with using the linux box as the gateway?  I have my linux system at home

running ip masquerade with my dsl line works great.  But not sure if I
can have it as a gateway to the machines with true Internet address's
and Masquerading at the same time.
Any help would be appreciated.
...Kevin




--

From: Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 
=?iso-8859-1?Q?=BD=D0=B0=DDRH5=2E2=A4=E4=B4=A9=AD=FE=A8=C7=BCt=B5P=AA=BANetwork?= 
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 20:57:26 +0800

During the installation state you will have the chance to select from
a list of network cards

John


ronsu wrote:

 Hi All:

  ½Ð°ÝRH5.2¤ä´©­þ¨Ç¼tµPªºNetwork card?

  ©Î¬O­n¦p¦ó±qLINUX¤W±oª¾¡H

   My e-mail :"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

   Thanks advance !

 Ron Su


--

From: "news.nacamar.de" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: S.u.S.E. 5.3  ISDN  PPP: pppd not functioning!
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:29:11 +0100

Hello Edwin

If you're using SuSE 5.3, This has ISDN support out of the box,
so you don't need to compile the kernel all you need to do is start YaST
and add your card,
and ppp interface under network settings.

do a reboot and run: isdnctrl dial ippp0, then ping your provider.
don't forget to add your providers name server ip under /etc/hosts or every
time you boot isdn will dial out to resolve the name servers ip address.

good luck..

If you run into problems drop me a line... andyr@(nospam)itab-net.com
andy


Edwin van Geelen schrieb in Nachricht 78g2t0$dkm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,

I've just installed S.u.S.E. Linux 5.3. I've then recompiled the kernel to
correctly support PPP and my Teles ISDN card. During startup I can see that
PPP is present in the kernel.
However, when I use pppd, I get a message that the kernel doesn't support
PPP.
Do any of you know this problem? Or do I use the pppd command in a wrong
way?
My ISDN device is ippp0.

Thanks,
Edwin



--

From: Neil Zanella [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ftp over modem line stalls at 100% : why???
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 04:48:05 -0330


Hello,

I have experienced ftp stalls over modem lines many many times.

What puzzles me is that no matter if I am dialed up to ISP #A,

or ISP #B, no matter if I am using SLIP or PPP, no matter if I am

booted into Linux or Windows, no matter whether I am using Netscape,

wget, ftp, etc... to download my files, 99.99% of stalls

I experience happen when my data has been downloaded to 100%.

And the cursoe goes down two lines or whatever, the program says 100%,

and how do I know there's a byte missing?: I don't get my ftp prompt

back, The program just stalls, and it stalls at 100%, and the data happens

to be corrupt when I try to install my package or unpack my archive.

What is going on with these f* 

Linux-Networking Digest #991

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #991, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 07:14:21 EST

Contents:
  Linux/Win - DNS problem (Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rnbak?= Jensen)
  newbie email-Q, please help: Linux,POP3,fetchmail,sendmail,hostname,FQDN? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux as Terminal-Server (Radovan Brako)
  Re: 3c509 irq  inn News Server ("David R. Bergstein")
  Linux as Terminal-Server ("Karsten Wehner")
  Re: Does TIP dialer still exist anywhere? (Villy Kruse)
  Re: Iinux manual ("Darryl Burling")
  NFS between Linux RedHat 5.2 (Marcos Tang)
  Re: Win98 + Linux (samba) (David Ison)
  Re: Win98 + Linux (samba) ("Robert C. Paulsen, Jr.")
  Re: Linux server on small network (Steve Lamb)
  Linux and the Kingston KNE110TX ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  PPP internet connection problem ("tf49665")
  Linux and Netware and PCI (Derek Schaible)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Derek Schaible)



Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:06:15 +0100
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rnbak?= Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Linux/Win - DNS problem

Hey!

With help from the DNS-howto I have configured a Linux box for running
DNS...
On the localhost all dns queries works fine but when I try to use DNS
from a Win machine I get Bad IP number... I don't know if it is the Win
machine or Linux machine been responsible.. It is my only Linux box..

HELP!!

--
Greetings!
Christian B. Jensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Chief Developer
The Factory

 ISP, Web and Video-development
 The Danish RealNetworks expert




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: newbie email-Q, please help: Linux,POP3,fetchmail,sendmail,hostname,FQDN?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:49:12 GMT



Hi linux-users!

I'm quite new to Linux and certainly no expert of TCP/IP and so on.
I've learned a lot the past couple of days, but now I'm really stuck.
So, probably I'm about to ask a FAQ, but I can't find the information
I need on dejanews, nor in the Linux faq, HOWTO's etcetera.
Here it goes:

a- I like to send and receive email on my linux box.
b- I have Red Hat 5.1; sendmail, procmail, fetchmail installed.
c- I have an ISP with a pop3 server, ppp connection working.

So far I can contact the pop3 server of my ISP (using fetchmail), but cannot
establish a SMTP connection between the pop3 server of the ISP and my linux
box, to transfer the mail to my computer.

The questions that arise:

1) I get a dynamic IP number: what should I choose as a hostname?
   (If I choose 'somename' as hostname, and do a "nslookup
   somename.my.isp.domain" from another host (with fixed internet connection)
   it cannot find it. Does this mean that the hostname I chose doesn't
   have any meaning whatsoever?). If I do 'nslookup my-dynamic-ip-nr'
   I get some cryptic name, not related to the hostname I chose.
2) How should I 'activate' port 25 on my linux box for accepting mail by SMTP?
   (Should I do that in the first place?) (for instance my /etc/host.deny
   says "ALL: ALL", does that mean that I do not accept 'connections' on
   port 25?)
3) Should I run sendmail as a daemon to accept incoming SMTP traffic at
   port 25? How to do that on a RedHat installation?
4) How do I tell (through fetchmail) that the pop3 server should
   send my mail to my humble linux box. Probably something different
   than my chosen hostname as mentioned in point 1 above.? If I use
   the name found by 'nslookup my-dynamic-internet-ip-nr' it does not
   work either. Should that normally work?
5) If I specify the ISP's domain name (e.g. by RedHat's netcfg-tool) it
   shows up in /etc/resolv.conf (in the line "search my.isp.name").
   However, if I send mail to a non-local email adress in the 'From'
   field only 'user@somename' shows up, so not a FQDN.
   Making a /etc/mailname file with the ISP domain name (as sugessted
   in the ISP-hookup-HOWTO) didn't change this.
6) How can I (using sendmail) have my email adress at my ISP in the
   'From' and 'Reply-to' fields of my sent emails, so that recipients
   can easily reply. (instead of the 'user@somename' as mentioned under
   number 5).

Thanks in advance for any help! Please send copy of the usenet replies to:
"joost . willemen @ rt . bosch . de" (please remove the whitespaces
inbetween). (I don't have a usenet client installed yet. Probably next
questions).

Best regards,

Joost


= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Radovan Brako)
Subject: Re: Linux as Terminal-Server
Date: 25 Jan 1999 10:52:29 +0100

In 78hcs1$9pm$[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Karsten Wehner" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I want to use a Linuxbox as a Terminal-Server for a serial port to connect a
machine with a serial port to 

Linux-Networking Digest #992

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #992, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 09:16:10 EST

Contents:
  Re: ftp over modem line stalls at 100% : why??? (Mark Cooperstein)
  Re: demand dialing with pppd (Michael Meissner)
  Re: CHATSCRIPT Fails (Julian Bordas)
  Re: Running Xterm from another Linux box on the network (Bob Tennent)
  Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  NFS: lockd/statd working ?! (Sven Anders)
  Re: X2/V90 PPP Modem Settings (Jim Chisholm)
  Re: Linux and Netware and PCI (Derek Schaible)
  Re: Problem in using uugetty/PPP server (Jim Chisholm)
  DNS, sysquery and masq (Shoki)
  automount problems (tperuzzi)
  Re: PORT 110 Connection refused !! (Jim Chisholm)
  Booting AIX Client? ("Markus Kramer")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re: ftp over modem line stalls at 100% : why???
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:24:14 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Neil 
Zanella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello,

snip...

If you have compression enabled (STAC, or whatever) then disable it.  This has 
been known to cause ftp "stalling".  In Windows, it's in the DUN setting 
called "Software Compression". In Linux, I have no idea...

Mark

**  Remove ".nospam" when replying or email will bounce back to you...

--

From: Michael Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: demand dialing with pppd
Date: 24 Jan 1999 22:54:40 -0500

Juergen Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hello,
 
 I have Slackware 3.6 with pppd 2.2, pl 0. I set my ppp connection up
 with pppsetup. This created a ppp-up file that takes a -d option to run
 pppd in dial-on-demand mode.
 In that mode, pppd uses the following option file:

pppd 2.3.5 (which you will need to upgrade to in any case if/whenever you go to
2.2.0 of the kernel) supports demand dialing.  Note, you will need to set up a
fixed ip address for the remote side (ie, I'm not sure it jibes with
ipcp-accept-remote).  I find diald to be more flexible at demand dialing, but
it looks like diald is withering, given the lack of activity on the home page.

-- 
Michael Meissner, Cygnus Solutions (Massachusetts office)
4th floor, 955 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED],617-354-5416 (office),  617-354-7161 (fax)

--

Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:45:42 +1100
From: Julian Bordas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CHATSCRIPT Fails

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==276409CC34F40DC69A1BB728
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello
The options file is below

lock
crtscts
asyncmap  0
modem
defaultroute
connect  "/usr/sbin -v -f /etc/ppp/chatscript"
/dev/modem
0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0
noipdefault
ipcp-accept-remote

Julian

Clifford Kite wrote:

 The expect/send chat script shown below should have dialed the phone,
 *provided* it is in a file that is called by chat with the -f option
 and everything else is correctly scripted and correctly configured
 for the software and hardware.

 You really need to post the full pppd script, the full chat script(s),
 and the chat messages in /var/log/messages as well as the pppd and
 kernel versions.  The scripts and messages should be duplicates
 of the originals, extracted with an editor or other program.

 For help with a problem after you successfully dial out you will also
 need to use the PPP "debug" option and post the PPP negotiation messages
 that are in /var/log/debug as well as the form of any PAP or CHAP
 secrets file.

 The particular file for these messages varies with the distribution so
 you may have to look around in /etc/log for the right one.  Sometimes you
 may have to configure /etc/syslog.conf to get the messages sent to a file,
 "man syslog.conf" can help if this needs to be done.

 The timestamps of the messages sometimes provide a clue as to the cause
 of the problem and should be included with the messages.

 Julian Bordas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

 : I'm trying to connect to my ISP via LINUX with this chatscript
 :  # Chatscript
 :  #
 :  REPORT  CONNECT
 :  TIMEOUT 3
 :  ABORT   NO\sDIALTONE
 :  ABORT   BUSY
 :  ABORT   NO\sANSWER
 :  ''  \rAT
 :  'OK-+++\c-OK'   ATH0
 :  TIMEOUT 30
 :  OK  ATFC1D2K3
 :  OK  ATDT92569100
 :  CONNECT ''

 : I get an error message in /var/log/messages thus
 : unterminated quote (line 8)

 I haven't seen this particular error before.  There should be other chat
 messages in the messages file, at least with the -v chat option.

 --
 Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
 /* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
  * It _has_ to be */

--
Microsoft;  The really good marketing company that occasionally produces
semi-workable software.


==276409CC34F40DC69A1BB728
Content-Type: 

Linux-Networking Digest #993

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #993, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 11:13:40 EST

Contents:
  3c509 problem (Lun)
  SuSe rooting from 2 nets to internet (Manfred Lemke)
  Re: Ether broke in Linux, still works in Win98?!? ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: Why would X not work after istalling a NIC? (Mogens Kjaer)
  Re: d-link DFE-530TX (Mogens Kjaer)
  Re: Test - please ignore (Kevin Martin)
  Re: NFS linux-osf1 slow, linux-irix fast (Torsten Blank)
  Re: What could "modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17" be? (Jeffrey T Kowalczyk)
  Re: help setting up ethernet card in redhat 5.2 ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: ipautofw with redhat 5.2 ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: RH5.2 Dual NIC Startup Troubles (Tom Morris)
  Re: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook ("KO")
  Re: Basic Home Network Guidance - Please ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Problem with internet connection: no response from anything but provider (Edwin van 
Geelen)
  ftp upload: permissions question (Hendrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?Krau=DF?=)
  command ARP (Adresse Resolution Protocol) ? (Chouki Aktouf)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lun)
Subject: 3c509 problem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:46:52 GMT

I have install the RH 5.2 but I cannot setup my 3c509 card, when
startup and shutdown, it shown a message "symbol for parameter I/O not
found". Is my card's setup problem?? How can I fix it.
Thank you very much


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manfred Lemke)
Subject: SuSe rooting from 2 nets to internet
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 21:50:04 +0100

I have a problem with my rooting and Linux, SuSe5.3, in combination with
Apache webserver . I have 2 nets. One of them works correct and I can
use with my clients in this net over the linix-machine the internet. The
second net is connected to the first over a novell-machine. I can ping
the linux-machine from the second net, but only the netcard eth0, not
die ISDN-card ippp0.
Who can help me? Many thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Tel: 0049 228 469532
Fax:  0049 228
479342


--

From: "Jeff Volckaert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ether broke in Linux, still works in Win98?!?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:09:49 -0500

Try setting it to jumperless at irq=10, io=300 and reserve those in your
bios for "isa legacy devices" .  This will prevent anything from jumping on
it.  I've had some problems in the past with funky ISA PNP cards.

Jeff Volckaert

Christian G. Allred wrote in message 78du34$b1t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have an ISA PnP ethernet card which up 'till a little while ago
was working in Linux, but no longer does so.  I don't know what may
have changed to cause it to stop, but it won't work.

Although the card works just fine under Windows 98 (gets IP via DHCP,
can telnet, ftp, play StarCraft etc. just fine), under Linux it causes
the driver to output errors to the kernel, whether using dhcpcd or static
addresses.  The errors are "ARP: called for own IP" (or similar), followed
by "eth0: Tx timed out.  Lost interrupt? TSR=number ISR=number
t=number".   This error I know comes from
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/8390.c
but I don't know what's causing it.  The card gets properly configured
with isapnp, and the driver is loaded with the right io and irq.  In fact,
the problem exists even if the card is set with jumpers.

So why does it work in Winblows 98 and not Linux?  Any clues?

Email replies would be appreciated, though any help would be great.

--
  .---...
 / Christian G. Allred \  / Assistant System Administrator   \
/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]\/  BYU Electrical Engineering Department \
\(801) 378-8743 /\Provo, Utah, USA/
 \  Callsign - KD7DIE  /  \  http://www.ee.byu.edu/~chris/
  `---'`'



--

From: Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why would X not work after istalling a NIC?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:46:30 +0100

Darren Ford wrote:
 
 I installed a NIC and it is recognised by the tulip driver.  I
 configured TCP/IP and now X won't come up.  Why would this happen?  Or
 is something else wrong?

Could it be an irq conflict?

What does /proc/pci, /proc/interrupts, and /proc/ioports say
with/without the NIC present?

Mogens
-- 
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

--

From: Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: d-link DFE-530TX
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:52:50 +0100

Luis Rodrigues wrote:
 
 This card uses a chipset from Digital, use the driver for the Digital
 card and it will work without problems. I can't remember now what the

Linux-Networking Digest #994

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #994, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 13:13:39 EST

Contents:
  Re: Redhat 5.1A Toshiba Libretto70CT...and a Kingmac PCMCIA Network 
card..wowwhat a mess. ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Re: Samba Setup ("Jeff Volckaert")
  Internet connections with Motorola GSM phones (Marco Bravi)
  IP problem with second interface (David Spindler)
  Re: policy editor questions... ("Ron van Middendorp")
  Re: Linux - Windows Network (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Problem with internet connection: no response from anything but  (David 
Kirkpatrick)
  Re: demand dialing with pppd ("Simon Annetts")
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Does ICQ and Yahoo Chess work with IP Masq? (Manthey, Tobias)
  Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 (Manthey, Tobias)
  DHCP acting funny? (Raphael Clifford)
  Re: Win98 + Linux (samba) (David Kirkpatrick)
  How to change the mailbox size for Linux's SendMail? ("quek")
  Re: Help with installing KDE (Mark Roberts)
  How do I limit the size of a home account? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ? (Geoff Allsup)
  Can I get a News Feed? ("David Francis")
  Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ? (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: PPP-MSCHAP - WinNT not working... (Clifford Kite)
  Re: Linux/Win - DNS problem (Manthey, Tobias)
  Re: Can't Telnet To Linux 5.2 from MS workstation ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: "Jeff Volckaert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.1A Toshiba Libretto70CT...and a Kingmac PCMCIA Network 
card..wowwhat a mess.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:26:21 -0500

Just a thought, but did you add a default route?  Can you ping your own IP?

Jeff Volckaert

JamesLay wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
WellI got Linux installed...no small feat, on a Libretto.  Got
PCMCIA services working.  No go on the LAN thoughI get link and
rx/tx lights, but Network is unreachable is the msg of the day.  Tried
adding eth0 NE in the Xwindow Kernal tool, but still no go (Can't seem
to remove it now from the Kernalhmmm)  Help!

James



--

From: "Jeff Volckaert" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Setup
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:04:51 -0500

Post your /etc/smb.conf file.  If you want to email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) it to me as well I'll see if I can help.

Jeff Volckaert


Scallica wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...

Hey,

I have Samba 2.0 running on Redhat 5.2. I can see my computer in Network
Neighborhood in Win 95, but I cannot see any of my shares. I defined them
properly in my smb.conf file. I am not sure what else to do. Any
suggestions?
Thanx.



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Bravi)
Subject: Internet connections with Motorola GSM phones
Date: 25 Jan 1999 15:27:38 GMT

Dear Linuxers,

I have a Motorola CD920 phone and would like to make internet 
connections with my portable computer.

Do you know of any PCMCIA card that can be used with this cellular phone
and that is supported under Linux? (Is the Motorola CELLect family usable
under Linux???).

Further question. I would like-eventually-to be billed for my data 
traffic and not for the time I spend on my internet connection. What
options do I have *in Italy*? (My contract is with Omnitel).

Thanks a lot in advance. 

Marco Bravi
--
--
Marco Bravi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dip. Ing. Chimica   tel. +39-6-44585587 / 612
v. Eudossiana, 18   fax  +39-6-4827453
I-00184 Roma (Italy)

--

From: David Spindler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP problem with second interface
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:34:07 -0600

I am running a redhat 5.2 on a fast intel box. It has two network
interfaces one is configured for the default network(eth0) and one is not
configured(eth1).
I wanted to use it as a sniffer so connected eth1 to a span port and
turned it on.

ifconfig eth1 up promisc -arp

This caused two problems.
1. The computer could no longer compunicate with computers on the local
network.
2. The computer would answer all pings he heard on eth1 thorugh the
configued eth0 regardless of who they were destined for.

arp showed that he was seeing correct arp entries for all the local
computers, and route showed that he had the correct entires.

This was not a problem under redhat 5.1, so I was thinking about
downgrading. Any Suggestions?


--

From: "Ron van Middendorp" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
Subject: Re: policy editor questions...
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:26:14 +0100
Reply-To: "Ron van Middendorp" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In the Netlogon share you can put one (ore more) config.pol file(s).
With a batch-file it should be possible to invoke the right file for
specific users or machines.

(If username=blabla then call blabla, etc)

Next URL is a nice one for examples of 

Linux-Networking Digest #995

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #995, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 15:14:16 EST

Contents:
  Re: Is there an application allow us to read MS Exchange mails in Linux ? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux - Windows Network (David Kirkpatrick)
  Bridging two LANS (Gary Lake)
  Re: PPP internet connection problem (Clifford Kite)
  Re: DNS problem with IP Masq Gateway (Matthew Ho)
  Re: Name Mangling Problem!?!? (David Collier-Brown)
  Re: Sygate (Win 98) server to Linux client (Kevin Martin)
  Re: Can I get a News Feed? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rgen?= Lundberg)
  configuration of eth0  ifconfig ("John K")
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Sygate (Win 98) server to Linux client ("Marv Woolard")
  Re: 3c509 problem (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Redhat vs. Slackware (James Youngman)
  PPP and hard disk problem (Alexander Walz)
  Re: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook (John Alexander)
  Router/Proxy ("Daniel Kühner")
  Can someone tell me if a TN5250 emulation for Linux exists? ("Jocelyn Dionne")
  How do I limit the size of a home account? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  3c509 - device or resource busy - register value 6d00 (Andy)
  Login Summary for ISDN-Server ("Marco Grimm")
  Re: command ARP (Adresse Resolution Protocol) ? (Brian McCauley)
  TCP/IP+EtherTalk Mac-Linux link (nuno faria pires)
  Re: Caching nameserver under Linux with Masquerading... (Brian McCauley)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there an application allow us to read MS Exchange mails in Linux ?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:41:34 GMT

In article 78d7ke$del$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Does anyone out there know of such application -- where we can actually
 read our mail from the MS Exchange server (non-POP3) and it runs on Linux
 /or Unix ?

I use Linux to read mail from our MS Exchange server. First I had to convince
my company to turn on the IMAP4 capability of Exchange (that was the hard
part). Then I just pointed Netscape's Mail client to the exchange server and
it worked.

Exchange also does POP3, but I wanted IMAP4. There are even more client-side
choices if you want POP3.

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: David Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux - Windows Network
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:40:33 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Routes can be lost if routed/gated are running.  Kill -4 .

David Kirkpatrick wrote:
 
 Have you:
  setup /etc/smb.conf i.e. top config section and disk specific
 info below,
  resolved which encryption you will set in /etc/smb.conf
  setup passwords with smbpasswd.
 Can you ping by address AND hostname?  What is ipconfig /all
 and
 nbtstat -N  xx.xx.xx.xx and netstat -r?
 There is a common FAQ about loosing routes which may be
 happening.
 Do a netstat -r before and after your problem on each machine to
 see
 if its this problem.
 Whats in hosts on both machines /etc/hosts  c:\windows\hosts.
 Same
 for networks. You'll probaby have 192.168.1 in networks.
 
 Peter Limbach wrote:
 
  Hi Mark,
 
  thanks for your advice.  For test purposes I have set up a small network
  consisting of a 486 DX4 with a 540 MB Disk acting as a server.  The machine
  has Slackware 3.0 on it with the 3.5 Network package.
  The NIC is an NE2000 clone.
 
  On the other end I have my son's Win98 PC with a 3COM NIC.
 
  The Samba package is installed, but the Network behaves funny.
 
  On booting up I can ping in both directions with proper communication.  The
  WIN98 PC however doesn't see the Linux machine in the network.  On the Linux
  machine I can run the smbclient -L only once, as soon as I try to run it
  once more the Linux machine refuses to communicate with the WIN98 machine.
  The pings dont work also. Am I missing something important?
 
  regards
 
  Peter
 
  Peter Limbach wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   I am planning a network for our company and have become interested in
  Linux. 
  
  Yes, you can do this, see SAMBA.
  
 
  
  Regards
  
  Mark Roberts
 
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: Gary Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bridging two LANS
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 02:28:26 -0500

I have two LANS both phycially connected to the same ethernet hub(s).
Actually the first one is real and the second is in developmentto
eventually replace the first.  Maybe I'm going about this the hard way,
but I want to use a different IP addressing scheme for my new LAN.
Right now, the existing LAN in running ip's 129.47.0.xxx (all static
ip's) and I hope to make the new LAN use 192.168.0.xxx. (and use DHCP)

The idea is that I need a way (if possible) to make the existing
workstations (129.47.0.xxx) see hosts in the 

Linux-Networking Digest #997

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #997, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 18:13:53 EST

Contents:
  Re: Tricky PPP server problem (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Linux to ISDN router to ISP: sendmail can't send (Raymond Doetjes)
  controlling NT Lan from Linux box ("Jon Horner")
  Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Connect without hub (Kevin Oberman)
  Re: CHATSCRIPT Fails (Clifford Kite)
  Admin NT network from a Linux box ("Jon Horner")
  Re: PPP and hard disk problem (David Kirkpatrick)
  Dialup using NIC IP address ("Dan Christiansen")
  Re: RH5.2 Dual NIC Startup Troubles (Tom Morris)
  Re: DLINK DE220, WIN98, and Linux (Joe Ringer)
  Re: Palm III Network via HotSync Cradle (Chris Carlson)
  Re: Linux to ISDN router to ISP: sendmail can't send (Darin Ernst)
  Re: What Version to get? (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: pppd error - tcgetattr: Input/output error(5) (Clifford Kite)
  Re: What could "modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17" be? (Jeffrey T Kowalczyk)
  PLEASE HELP (I HAVE A PATHETIC NEWBIE QUESTION)!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tricky PPP server problem
Date: 25 Jan 1999 18:31:00 +

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Pouliot) writes:

 Hello, I have an interesting problem...
 I have a network interface that has 2 subnetwork,
 one with 16 IPs (#1) and one with 32 IPs (#2)...
 The ethernet card has one IP in the subnet #1,
 the subnet #2 is defined by static routes...
 Traffic from local computers to internet and
 the reverse work...
 The traffic from the PPP if they are on subnet #1 works.
 But not if they are on subnet #2.
 I use option "proxyarp" on pppd...
 And with subnet #2 it doesn't find which ethernet adapter
 to use: "Cannot determine ethernet address for proxy ARP"

Create an alias for the ethernet card with an address in #2.

Alternatively take the proxyarp option out of the PPP options and just
enable blunderbus proxyARP permanently.

arp -Ds 0.0.0.0.0 eth0 netmask 0.0.0.0 pub

-- 
 \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from| Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\/~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\   ~   ~ ~~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

--

From: Raymond Doetjes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: Linux to ISDN router to ISP: sendmail can't send
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 22:29:34 +0100

Well your DM change is the problem! Since some ISP's reject relaying
SMTP when it comes from unkown domains. So you should set your ISP domain
name in it.

Raymond


--

From: "Jon Horner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: controlling NT Lan from Linux box
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:00:37 -0500

Okay, I finally got the management to look the other way while I put a linux
box on the network.  Right now, it is serving an internal web-site.  I would
really like to know how to set up an smtp and pop3 server on the box for
internal mail, and I would also like to be able to admin the network from
the Linux box.  Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Jon



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.networks
Subject: Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 20:51:14 GMT

If what you are trying to do is to have two cards with an unique ip and
connected to same network to do different tasks, it wont work. as for
microsfot design, multiple computers with same computer name situation
is not allowed.

If you just want your configured connected to multiple networks, you
can add interfaces as much as resource allows.


In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  Amey Laud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am building a distributed number crunching system, in which a lot of
 data needs to be moved between machines.
 In order to streamline the process and avoid bottlenecks due to
 network/IO latencies, I am considering
 using separate networks to handle the input and the output, that is,
 each system reads from a different physical network
 and writes into a different physical network. This would mean that each
 machine have two IP addresses
 that are configured on separate ethernet cards and can be addressed and
 used explicitly.
 1. Is such an arrangement possible? (That is, OS and IP support)
 2. Are there existing examples of such a setup?
 3. The arrangement might involve heterogenous platforms.
  I am interested specifically on the possibility of such a setup on
 NT/Linux running on Intel (Xeon)/Alpha.

 4. Are there existing message passing API's (such as MPI) based on
 TCP/IP that support such a configuration.

 I would glad to get any suggestions in this 

Linux-Networking Digest #998

1999-01-25 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #998, Volume #9  Mon, 25 Jan 99 21:13:35 EST

Contents:
  Re: diald -not replacing default route (Michael Meissner)
  Re: PLEASE HELP (I HAVE A PATHETIC NEWBIE QUESTION)!! ("Jon Horner")
  Re: IPFWADM Problem ("David K. Means")
  Re: T-Online under Linux (Andreas Schuderer)
  Re: Can't Telnet To Linux 5.2 from MS workstation ("Jon Horner")
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Darren Ford)
  Shotgun (dual modem dialup) ("Tom Shealy")
  Re: FTP server? (bgeer)
  Re: Samba win95/98 over the internet (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Newbie / hosts file / domain name? (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Linux as Firewall with 3 NICs (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Setting Server Name (Mark Worsdall)
  NIS server setup not "make"ing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Raymond Doetjes)
  Dial-Up Server (Chris Jackson)
  Re: ip-masquerading (Raymond Doetjes)
  Network Printing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Network cards (Mike McNab)
  Re: identifying a NIC (Paul Hughett)
  Re: PPP and hard disk problem (Clifford Kite)
  Samba and named conflict (Steve Ledford)
  Re: X2/V90 PPP Modem Settings (Clifford Kite)
  Re: 3c509 problem ("qpop")
  Re: controlling NT Lan from Linux box (L J Bayuk)
  How do I setup Netscape in Xfree  to access the web trugh wingate 2.0 On a win 95 
Computer ? (Minou)
  Re: port forwarding on localhost (Raymond Doetjes)
  Reset root Password (Minou)
  Re: Cable Modem problems (Kimura)



From: Michael Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: diald -not replacing default route
Date: 25 Jan 1999 14:42:48 -0500

dizzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 when I request a service such as telnet my provider in /etc/hosts it
 triggers diald and sucessfully dials up gives me a local IP and remote
 IP
 then states
 "ppp not replacing existing default route to sl0"
  "connect script timed out. Killing script"
 Ive tried to add an IP address in route.conf but it dosent seem to make
 any difference
 apparently its looking for a replacement route for serial line 0. AFAIK
 this is a ficticioous device linking to ppp.
 I do have slip running when dials starts slip keep alive
 can someone shed some light to my delimmna?
 This is on SuSE 5.3 and Ive posted to their list but nada
 this is driving me nuts!!
 I spent most of the morning serching deja news but diddnt come upp with
 any answers.
 many thanks
 rob

Do you have patchlevel 5 of diald (version 0.16.5)?  As I recall it fixes some
routing problems.

-- 
Michael Meissner, Cygnus Solutions (Massachusetts office)
4th floor, 955 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED],617-354-5416 (office),  617-354-7161 (fax)

--

From: "Jon Horner" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP (I HAVE A PATHETIC NEWBIE QUESTION)!!
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:03:03 -0500

I'm not quite sure what you mean.  I'm confused as to how you will download
the file.  Are you going to download it to a Windows box?  Are you going to
download it to a dual boot system?  Are you going to download it to floppy?
Some more information would be good.

Jon.

Nausherwan I. Malik wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
WARNING : This is a bit of a stupid newbie question.

How can I download something of the Net and be able to use it in Linux.
(cos I need a file to get Internet working o my Linux box).

Thanks.
Nim Malik.

I can be contacted (preferably) on:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: "David K. Means" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPFWADM Problem
Date: 25 Jan 1999 14:04:23 -0800



Budman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in article
78gbsh$om8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I've been using IPFWADM for quite awhile.  Are there any good books or
docs on 
 IP rules?  

I found /usr/doc/HOWTO/Firewall-HOWTO to be pretty good, and ultimately
quite accurate.  The problem is that you sort of need to know a lot about
the
various protocols that might traverse the firewall in order to set things
up
to accommodate all of them.  Failing a thorough reading of about 6 of the
O'Reilly
books, I can recommend a little experimentation to find out how to get each
of
these things running right.

 I try using the -o switch, and it does not work. Is there a config
setting I 
 have missed?  Also, where do these packets get sent to which output log?
I 
 can't seem to locate which file does contain the logged packets.

If you haven't found the file /var/log/messages (on RedHat, at least), then
I'm not
sure what "... and it does not work" means.  This file is where my system
puts
all those messages.  A pointer to it is in /etc/syslog.conf (the line that
says
what to do with *.info entries).

Once you find these logging entries, you can then use this facility to find
out
what ports are needed by various protocols.  The basic scheme is that when
some protocol doesn't work, you turn on logging for all packets 

Linux-Networking Digest #1

1999-01-26 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #1, Volume #10   Tue, 26 Jan 99 02:13:44 EST

Contents:
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Elvis Whoppo)
  Wingate, proxy, netscape and linux (Bruce OBrien)
  Re: Terminators and thinnet ("Jim Ray")
  Re: Dialup using NIC IP address ("Tom Hulley")
  Re: help samba - Gethostbyaddr failed for 90.0.0.4 (Paul Harris)
  GTE, DSL and Linux (Stephen Carville)
  Re: Cookies, Smashing them, How-to? (Raymond Lillard)
  PPP LCP timeout: MRU contention ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Compatible CDRW Drive Recommendations?? (Landen Stoker)
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Norman Elliott)
  Looking for HOWTO for Win95/Linux network with crossover cable ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: TULIP CHIPSET: 10/100 Nic Anywhere? (Peter W)
  Re: Linux to ISDN router to ISP: sendmail can't send (Darin Ernst)
  Routing Question (NEWBIE) (John Smith)
  Problems with netatalk (Sebastian Wangemann)
  Re: Can Linux do Peer-to-Peer Networking ? (Norman Elliott)
  This is a question about hardware + networking (Tessai)
  Display ("Andrew Janssen")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Elvis Whoppo)
Subject: Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ?
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 04:47:11 GMT

"The mouse has moved... 
 ...Windows must restart before this setting takes effect"

All my love,
  -Whoppo



On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 03:33:44 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (j) wrote:

The sheer number of messages posted here - usually half going
unanswered - tells the tale ... Linux networking sucks. 

Now you can take your Winders, add in file-sharing in just a
couple of minutes, bring up your Winders workstations and
locate and link in within just another few minutes. Easy.
Quick. Relatively painless. Not the Linux way ...

Now you may try to defend Linux by saying that it has more
"flexibility" - but quite frankly we could do with a lot
less "flexibility" and a lot more simplicity. I'll bet
that 95% of users just want to tie into a local NT server
or use Linux AS a file/print server for Winders PCs. 
I think that "flexibility" is just an excuse - a euphamism
for "a bunch of really unsophisticated little utilities
written with no real plan in mind by people with a fetish
for cryptic poorly-documented command-line parameters and
well-hidden config files". As is, Linux is a user-UNfriendly
mirror of MSDOS - and that goes double for "connectivity" issues. 

Want cheap PC networking  connectivity ? One "L" word comes
to mind and it's NOT "Linux" - try "LanTastic" instead.

Now Linux IS relatively compact and fast and DOES get past
some of the old buggaboos inherent to DOS-derived systems,
but Linux just isn't "ripe" yet. It needs DUN boxes and
"Network" panels which HELP you with things and show all
the pertinent options and conflicts right there. 

Someone could make a LOT of money if they could put together
a turn-key Linux-based file/print server package which could
autoconfigure most things and be really easy and helpful on
the rest. Something you take out of the box and 20 minutes
later you have a good working server. You can do that with
Winders, but not with Linux unless you apparently have put
in a tremendous number of obsessive hours. 

Now you thought I was just gonna flame ... nope. I've been
relatively polite and realistic here. There are MANY issues
to address, MANY refinements to be made before Linux becomes
a really good option for administrators of small/medium networks.  
As much as I dislike Winders, it's a positive relief to boot
back into it after fooling around for hours in vain with Linux.
Preferring Winders to ANYTHING ... IMHO that's a pretty severe
indictment. Linux has been badly over-sold. If it weren't so
cheap it would be a rip-off ... a hobby OS masquerading as 
the "real deal". 



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce OBrien)
Subject: Wingate, proxy, netscape and linux
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:25:56 GMT

Hi, I'm a newbie with linux.

As soon as I know more about Linux i'm going to flush Mr. Gate

I have an Internet restaurant, 8 computers for internet and 10 for
games all in windows network.

It's a great place to learn.

I want to slowly tranfer all my internet dedicated computers on linux
software but I have a lot to learn.

I installed Redhat 5.2 with no problem at all, it's working well, I
can telnet, see the other computers in the network but:

I can't configure Netscape to pass by my win95 proxy box.  It's
wingate software.  I won't buy Sygate because as soon I know how linux
can do the job... Win 95 will go to the city dump.  And i'll show all
my customer how to use Linux and how it's better than Microsoft to
stay free.  So long using windows my brain was getting lazy. 

Until then I would like to put 3 workstation with Linux to access the
web, ftp and irc.  I need them to pass by my wingate machine :
192.168.0.1.In win 95 we just have to go in explorer option or

Linux-Networking Digest #6

1999-01-26 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #6, Volume #10   Tue, 26 Jan 99 09:13:57 EST

Contents:
  TCP/IP connectivity on LAN (Julienna Chu)
  Re: Linux firewall and Netmeeting ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
  need help setting up realaudio IP masquerading (Eugene Koontz)
  Re: diald - failed to set modem to controlling tty - help??? ("Simon Annetts")
  Re: Testing PPP (Norman Elliott)
  pop3 deamon? (Brent Rader)
  newbie question: turn on (Haaino Beljaars)
  Re: Can't connect with OS/2 station (Frank Manders)
  Re: `who` command generates dns query. Why? (David Efflandt)
  Re: Redhat vs. Slackware (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: 3c509 problem (Lun)
  Linux 5.1 DNS returns non-authoritive answers ("Tom Hulley")
  Wake-On-Lan (WOL) script (Job eisses)
  Re: GTE, DSL and Linux (Greg Weeks)
  Please Help -- smbclient works but smbmount doesn't?? (Mike Kirk)
  Re: Newbie wants to install networking.  Help! ("Sonnik (Anthony F.)")
  fetchmail preconnect keyword (Myriam Abramson)
  Re: Extraction of IP address (Michael Humphries-Dolnick)
  Re: Wingate, proxy, netscape and linux (Mark Cooperstein)
  Re: Linux Server slows down my Connection? (the nice guy)
  Re: Linux server on small network (Murray Spork)
  Re: pop3 deamon? (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: Reset root Password (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: Is there anything like NT's TRUST RELATIONSHIPS in Linux/Unix ? (Edwin Calimbo)
  Re: How do I limit the size of a home account? (Edwin Calimbo)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julienna Chu)
Subject: TCP/IP connectivity on LAN
Date: 26 Jan 1999 09:11:34 GMT

Guys,

I don't want to use SAMABA. I want to just use TCP/IP.
I have a Win NT machine 192.168.1.1 and subnet 255.255.255.0
and a Linux box 192.168.1.2 with subnet 255.255.255.0

What should I use for their default gateway?
I want the NT boxto be able to launch a telnet to 192.168.1.2
This is just a LAN with no Internet connectivity.

Thanks! Can someone please e-mail me the answer?


--

From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux firewall and Netmeeting
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:24:05 -0600

Netneeting dosent work with a linux firewall

Dave T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,

I  have linux up and running as a firewall, but can I get netmeeting
to work through this firewall? I cannot! I suspect it has something to
do with the ports used, and the fact that the firewall is blocking
these ports. The ports used are :

TCP: 389,522,1503,1720,1731 and 1024:65535(dynamic)
UDP 1024:65535(dynamic)

Does anyone have Netmeeting working through a linux firewall? If they
do, could I get a sneak peak at your firewall script? (I know this is
asking a lot, forgive me) Or even just some pointers. I've read all of
the FAQ, HOWTO's etc, and I've bought a couple of Linux books, but I
still dont get it. I guess I'm just plain thick!

Many thanks for any assistance rendered..

Dave Taylor
([EMAIL PROTECTED])



--

From: Eugene Koontz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: need help setting up realaudio IP masquerading
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:21:59 -0800

Ok, 
So I have two linux boxes. One's directly connected to the net via DSL.
This machine has IP masquerading set up for the second machine. The
second machine is doing fine with connecting to the Internet, *except*
for real audio. The realplayer on the second machine cannot play
networked real audio files. When I try, it says it's "buffering 20.0 k
file" but never gets beyond that. A look at Preferences-Statistics
shows that nothing is getting through the network to the player. It can
play the local "welcome.rm" file with no problem, though.
From what I read on the real audio firewall pages, the realaudio
protocol uses UDP port 7070 to send data from the client to the server.
So my question is, how do I modify my IP masquerading so that this
machine can send and receive at the proper ports? I tried doing on the
first machine : insmod ip_masq_raudio ports=7070 
which *seems* to have worked, (no feedback from the shell), but no
improvement on the second machine's ability to play remote realaudio
files.

Thanks for any insight, HOWTO references, etc...
Eugene Koontz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: "Simon Annetts" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diald - failed to set modem to controlling tty - help???
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:43:58 -

OK, my own fault I forgot the

mode ppp

option in diald.conf so it was trying to use slip.

duh!





--

From: Norman Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Testing PPP
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 08:40:46 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mark Lopez wrote:
 
 Are there any tools(sniffers,analyzers) , running on Linux, that can monitor
 PPP negotiatons. tcpdump only monitors after a connection is established. I
 need to see the connection coming up etc..
 
 Any help would be appreciated!
 
 

Linux-Networking Digest #14

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #14, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 02:13:50 EST

Contents:
  Redhat 5.2 PPP-server  win95 (Maurice)
  ftp scripts? (Michael Benedict)
  Re: Linux 5.1 DNS returns non-authoritive answers ("Tom Hulley")
  Re: Compatible CDRW Drive Recommendations?? ("Christopher Cox")
  Win95-Linux: ftp but no telnet? (Gordon Dailey)
  Redhat 5.2 PPP-sever for win95 (Maurice)
  Re: Redhat 5.2 PPP-server  win95 (Nelson Yan)
  NICs ("cInDeR")
  Re: Nt  linux ("Levon Barker")
  Re: two ip addresses / two gateways / one machine? ("Jeffrey S. Kline")
  Re: setting up cable modem (Joel Nelson)
  Re: PPP Setup for Uswest.net Dial in ("Jeffrey S. Kline")



From: Maurice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Redhat 5.2 PPP-server  win95
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 23:28:41 +0100


Hello,

I`m trying to set my Redhat 5.2 box to act as a ppp-server for win95 .
I use mgetty and pppd
Mgetty works fine, it detects the call and it starts up pppd bij de
AutoPPP entry in login.conf
The pppd seems to make a connection but then It hangs up at the point
where i should get a name  passwd popup window in windows95.
Mij ppp/options file looks like this at the moment, I experimantated a
lot with ppp-options, but nothing seems to help.


auth
+pap
-chap
login
modem
crtscts
lock
proxyarp
detach

this is my options.ttyS1


194.32.150.158:194.32.150.201


wich should work for my machine with ip 194.32.150.158



this is my  pap-secrets

# Secrets for authentication using PAP
# clientserver  secret  IP addresses
* *  ""*

this  is what my mgetty.ttyS1 log looks like


01/26 14:56:03 yS1  send: ATA[0d]
01/26 14:56:03 yS1  waiting for ``CONNECT''
01/26 14:56:03 yS1   got: [0d]
01/26 14:56:03 yS1CND: RING[0a]ATA[0d]
01/26 14:56:03 yS1CND: ATA[0d][0a]CONNECT ** found **
01/26 14:56:17 yS1  send:
01/26 14:56:17 yS1  waiting for ``_''
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   got:  28800/V42[0d]
01/26 14:56:17 yS1CND: CONNECT 28800/V42
01/26 14:56:17 yS1CND: found: 28800/V42[0a] ** found **
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read:
~[ff]}#[c0]
!}!}!}
}7}"}} }*} } }%}} [ac][92][a2]}'}"}(}"}-}#}t[9f]~
01/26 14:56:17 yS1looking for utmp entry... (my PID: 492)
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   utmp + wtmp entry made
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   tio_set_flow_control( HARD )
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   print welcome banner (/etc/issue)
01/26 14:56:17 yS1   getlogname (AUTO_PPP), read:~[ff]}#[c0]!
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   input finished with '\r', setting ICRNL ONLCR
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   tio_get_rs232_lines: status: RTS CTS DSR DTR DCD
01/26 14:56:20 yS1login: use login config file
/usr/local/etc/mgetty+
sendfax
/login.config
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   match: user='/AutoPPP/', key=''
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   match: user='/AutoPPP/', key=''
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   match: user='/AutoPPP/', key='/AutoPPP/'*** hit!
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   calling login: cmd='/usr/sbin/pppd', argv[]='pppd'
01/26 14:56:20 # data dev=ttyS1, pid=492, caller='none',
conn='28800/
V42', n
ame='', cmd='/usr/sbin/pppd', user='/AutoPPP/'

01/26 14:56:20 yS1   setenv: 'CALLER_ID=none'
01/26 14:56:20 yS1   setenv: 'CONNECT=28800/V42'



Then here is my log messages with kdebug 7 debug


Jan 26 14:56:20 maurinux kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Jan 26 14:56:20 maurinux kernel: registered device ppp0
Jan 26 14:56:20 maurinux pppd[492]: pppd 2.3.5 started by LOGIN, uid 0
Jan 26 14:56:20 maurinux pppd[492]: Using interface ppp0
Jan 26 14:56:20 maurinux pppd[492]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/ttyS1
Jan 26 14:56:49 maurinux pppd[492]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Jan 26 14:56:49 maurinux pppd[492]: Modem hangup
Jan 26 14:56:49 maurinux pppd[492]: Connection terminated.
Jan 26 14:56:50 maurinux pppd[492]: Exit.
Jan 26 14:58:14 maurinux last message repeated 2 times
Jan 26 14:58:20 maurinux kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
un
regist

You can see the hangup after the connect of ppp0 and ttyS1
At that point I should get the pap auth
I made sure that i`m useing a pppd without shadow passwd capababilty
because Red HAt 5.2 doesn`t have shadow passwd configured standard.


I tried everything (that i could think of) but I can`t find out what is
going wrong here
Maybe I just need some extra pppd options

If somebody knows how to solve this or has some suggestions I would be
very grateful.


Maurice Mahieu

If you got an answer please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks in advance


--

From: Michael Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ftp scripts?
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:45:17 -0500

I couldn't find info on this on howto.linuxberg.org or in the man pages,
so I am wondering if anyone knows how to do ftp scripts (or if they can
be done).  Basically, I am trying to create a shell program that will be
run daily and update my ip (I am on a dhcp cable modem network) to a
page on my website.  Grabbing the info to do so is easy, but entering
the ftp 

Linux-Networking Digest #17

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #17, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 08:13:31 EST

Contents:
  DHCP Linux server and subnets help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Default Gateway interferes with PPP? (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Samba Printing ("Jeffrey S. Kline")
  IP Forwarding and Linux 2.2.0 (Darren Ward)
  Re: newbie email-Q, please help: Linux,POP3,fetchmail,sendmail,hostname,FQDN? 
("Jon Horner")
  Re: Linux in a Token Ring network (Stef)
  multihome routing puzzler (Bob Sutterfield)
  Re:diald- not replacing default route (dizzy)
  dhcpcd refuses to install ("T. Clements")
  Linux as a load balancing router SUGGESTIONS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Reset root Password (Jens Reinsberger)
  is my system overloaded? ("christo")
  security problem (dino)
  Re: SMTP problem, please help (Sam E. Trenholme)
  Re: How do I get my IP addresses in multiple NIC conf. (Lawrence Kirby)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP Linux server and subnets help
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 01:10:21 GMT

I am setting up a DHCP server on Redhat 5.1 running
ISC DHCPD V2-BETA-1-PATCHLEVEL-6

Our network has a router that seperates our class C ip address in to 4
segments.

The subnetting of each segment occurs every so many IP numbers, fo example:

xxx.xxx.xxx.32 is segment A with a mask of 255.255.255.224
The port for that router segment is xxx.xxx.xxx.33 (i.e. the client's gateway
for that subnet).

and so on.

I set-up the linux server on segment A, and configured a couple of clients to
test it. They have no problems getting IP addresses and info from the server.
But when I have a machine, on say segment C of the router, it doesn't work.

my dhcpd.conf looks like so:

default-lease-time 1000;
max-lease-time 3000;
option domain-name-servers 38.9.215.2, 38.9.225.2;
option domain-name "foobar.com";

shared-network FOOBAR {

# Router seg. A
subnet 10.0.1.32 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.224;
option broadcast-address 10.0.1.63;
option routers 10.0.1.33;
range 10.234.100.35 206.234.100.57;
}
# Router seq. B
subnet 10.0.1.64 netmask 255.255.255.192 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.192;
option broadcast-address 10.0.1.127;
option routers 10.0.1.65;
range 10.0.1.81 10.0.1.94;
range 10.0.1.96 10.0.1.126;
}

# Router seg. C
subnet 10.0.1.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.192;
option broadcast-address 10.0.1.191;
option routers 10.0.1.128;
range 10.0.1.131 10.0.1.140;
range 10.0.1.142 10.0.1.158;
}
# Router seg. D
subnet 10.0.1.192 netmask 255.255.255.192 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.192;
option broadcast-address 10.0.1.255;
option routers 10.0.1.192;
range 10.0.1.209 10.0.1.217;
range 10.0.1.240 10.0.1.248;
}
}

When monitoring the server in debug mode I notice it seems to only be
listening to it's own subnet and none of the others.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

thanks,

colins stefani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: David Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Default Gateway interferes with PPP?
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 20:15:38 +
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PPP0 wants to use it so it will work.  Do a route and you can see
it.
It is your network device and it is our gateway to the internet. 
Do
an ifconfig -a after ppp0 comes up.

Darren Enns wrote:
 
 This is what my laptop Linux 'netup' script looks
 like:
 
 insmod 8390
 MODPATH=/lib/modules/2.0.34/net:/lib/modules/2.0.34/pcmcia
 export MODPATH
 insmod pcnet_cs
 ifconfig eth0 inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
 route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
 #route add default gw 192.168.0.2 eth0
 /usr/sbin/routed
 
 I noticed that I could not have BOTH my PPP connection
 running *and* a local network running if I had that
 'route add default gw...' stuff.  So I commented it
 out and it works fine.
 
 Could someone explain in 'easy' terms why this is so?
 I am also very fuzzy on the 'routed' stuff.
 
 Thanks
 
 Dare
 --
 Darren Enns
 EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HTTP:  www.pangea.ca/~dmenns

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: "Jeffrey S. Kline" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Printing
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 19:03:15 -0600

If your using Redhat, this should be a snap as you use printtool to set up
what kind of printer it is. Then make sure you have proper entries inthe
"hosts" files, and refer to it as the 

Linux-Networking Digest #21

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #21, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 17:13:46 EST

Contents:
  Re: demand dialing with pppd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server errors... 
("Jeremy Fowler")
  How to get Linux to recognize "built-in" Ethernet? (Brian Barjenbruch)
  Re: PAP problem Please Help!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Routing Table Lookup Performance ("S. Marasciullo")
  Re: Samba Printing
  Re: authenticating http proxy server? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10 (Gernot Fink)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: demand dialing with pppd
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:01:13 GMT

Thank you Simon.  And thank you Clifford Kite.

I've been fighting this problem for a while (admitted longer than I should
have been).  I had figured out that the ppp.c was not getting copied and that
was the problem.  I hadn't gone so far as to determine the fix.

I decided to take one last look through DejaNews before I was going to post a
"what's the next step" email.

Thank you again.  Your timing was great.


In article 78i61g$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  "Simon Annetts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I got as far as compiling ppp-2.3.5 from
 ftp://cs.anu.edu.au/pub/software/ppp

 then realised I needed to recompile the kernel to get the new ppp module

 The ppp install program is broken so the new ppp.c code does not get
 installed
 and kernel comp fails. You will need to do this:

 Thanks to Clifford Kite for this one:-
 ***
 The ppp-2.3.5 package has a couple of problems with kernels 2.0.34 to
 2.0.36 .  One is that the ppp-2.3.5/linux/ppp.c isn't copied to the kernel
 source tree during the "make kernel" phase of ppp-2.3.5 installation.
 The other is a bug in a section of ppp.c that detects the kernel version
 and selects kernel-dependent code.

 A solution is to fix the versioning code in ppp-2.3.5/linux/ppp.c and
 then copy it to /usr/src/linux/drivers/net, overwriting the older ppp.c
 there.

 Look for this code beginning at line 3079 in ppp-2.3.5/linux/ppp.c and
 change the  to = .  Copy this ppp.c to /usr/src/linux/drivers/net and
 recompile the kernel.

 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE  VERSION(2,1,86)
 #define FREE_SKB(skb)   dev_kfree_skb(skb)
 #else
 #define FREE_SKB(skb)   dev_kfree_skb(skb, FREE_WRITE)
 #endif

 NOTE:  This problem goes away with 2.1.131+ kernels.
 

 Once I did this the kernel compiled and Linux rebooting with PPP (demand
 dialing)
 installed.

 It works in so much as you run pppd with the demand option (and all your
 other options) but
 it only uses the connect parameter when it detects IP traffic on the
 interface.

 I couldn't figure out though how to filter and how to drop the line again
 after x minutes!!!

 Now I'm trying diald which I was going to in the first place.

 Duh!

 regards
 Simon Annetts


= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: "Jeremy Fowler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server 
errors...
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 00:31:40 -0600
Reply-To: "Jeremy Fowler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ok, here is the situation (please, it looks long but you may find it
amusing)...

I am trying to use a RH Linux 5.2 Box as a email server for our office.
Simple you think... Well, I had everything installed I could see my ISP
nameservers and I could ping the hell out of anything out there. I then set
up DNS and BIND so that the Linux box was it's own primary name server for
our domain, everything went great (well, after reading O'Reilly DNS and BIND
2nd Edition, and plenty of posts to DNS newsgroups!). Then I set up sendmail
(also not an easy task, and I now have that wonderful O'Reilly book in my
collection, plus many a postings to sendmail newsgroups, so many I'm on
first name basis with Claus Assmann (kidding)). Well all was working
wonderfully lastnight, All I had to do was wait for our ISP to get off their
ass and edit their  DNS entries for our domain to point to the appropriate
places. Then I noticed something strange. When I was logged in as root, I
had total network access, but If I logged in as any other user I lost
network connection (outside my domain, I could still ping hosts on our LAN,
but all outside networks were unreachable). No big deal, I figured I would
figure it out later. Now today, for some strange reason it does it for root
too. For the first couple of minutes after I would reboot and login as root
I had internet access and could ping my nameserver, but if I tried pinging
anywhere else I got a "Network is unreachable" error. Then if I tried
pinging my nameserver again it too gave the "Network is unreachable" error.
Well, I ruled out my ISP because the 

Linux-Networking Digest #22

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #22, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 18:13:39 EST

Contents:
  Re: Nt  linux
  socket error (what is?) ("John K")
  Re: Logging into Netware server. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  infrared (Serje Beaudoin)
  SuSE 6.0 + Mail + IMAP + OutlookExpress ("nobody")
  Re: Connect without hub (Jerry Mendes)
  Re: long time to log in (Stef)
  Re: Linux on NetServer LH Pro (Dai to)
  SAMBA - Gethostbyaddr failed for 90.0.0.3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  machine crash ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Specifying netmasks for IP aliases with linuxconf (Firebeard)
  Kernel 2.2 in RPM ("John K")
  Problems with remote printing from VMS to Linux (Vilmos Soti)
  Re: PPP-MSCHAP - WinNT not working... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Default Gateway interferes with PPP? (Clifford Kite)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Keith Peterson")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nt  linux
Date: 27 Jan 1999 07:02:17 GMT

Hi,

Use Samb!

Try this URL, the guy has done a good job, a Samba Newbie must see site.

Regards and God Speed,

Gary

Gary W. Sandvik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
309-676-0224 (fax)
FireDragon wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a question...

We run a little NT LAN at home, and have recently aquired another machine,
which is running Linux, which we would love to have on the LAN, but
somehow,
it just doesn't want to co-operate. I can telnet into the Linux machine
from
one of the NT machines, but that is about it. Is it possible for us to get
the Linux machine to actively participate in the rest of our domain, or
will
it remain an outcast for ever?

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
FireDragon





--

From: "John K" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: socket error (what is?)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:15:47 -0500

Hello,

Thanks for helping me setting up my small 2 computer LAN.

Thanks to your advice, the computers can ping each other. The Proxy can ping
the client and the client can ping the proxy no problem. I set up netscape
to connect via proxy will all the numbers set correctly (192.168.0.1 port
80)

The problem is that when I go in netscape to browse somehere I get the
following error:

SOCKET ERROR 10049

what does that mean? strange no? How can I correct this?

Client is a RedHat 5.2 Linux
Proxy is a win98 under wingate



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Logging into Netware server.
Date: 27 Jan 1999 14:10:17 -0700

In article 784qhl$9if$[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[posted and mailed]

The ncpfs filesystem will allow you to mount Netware drives.

Any ideas on a way to copy files with original ownership intact from
ncpfs to a local (samba exported) filesystem?

- Iain


--

From: Serje Beaudoin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: infrared
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:31:30 -0600

HI all, 

I try to find one infrared driver for linux Someone know something
about that ??? 
  
--
Serje Beaudoin,
Geoservices RL Inc.
(514) 923-1500
internet:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: "nobody" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SuSE 6.0 + Mail + IMAP + OutlookExpress
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:21:51 +0100

Mail über IMAP-Protokoll mit imapd

Hallo Networker !

Kann mir jemand verraten, wie man OutlookExpress unter NT 4.0 dazu bringt
auf dem SuSE 6.0 die
Inbox /usr/spool/mail/user zu löschen ?

Ich kann die Mails mit OutlookExpress nur mit einem roten Kreuz für
"gelöscht" versehen.
Wirklich löschen geht irgendwie nicht. Das geht nur auf dem Linux mit "rm
/usr/spool/ ...".
Vorher habe ich POP3 benutzt. Das ging gut. Aber ich würde gern die Mail auf
dem Linux lagern.
Nur so für den Fall, daß Herr Gates mal wieder irgendwelche Formate ändert.

Gruß und vielen Dank.

Stephan



--

From: Jerry Mendes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: 26 Jan 1999 23:50:32 PST

Hey everyone, I stand corrected, and I stand dejected.  Excuse me.  Enough already.
*S*

Jerry Mendes wrote:

 I may be wrong, but I believe 10BaseT and 10/100 cards need to see a "Link Beat"
 signal from a hub before they will work; therefore, a simple crossover cable
 won't work.

 It's so easy to buy an inexpensive hub, why not just do it?

 Paul E Larson wrote:

  In article 77s6cr$6ap$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Humski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I am planning to connect the following two machines with ethernet
  without using a hub.
  
  
  These machines are only two feet apart.
  I heard it is possible to directly connect two 

Linux-Networking Digest #23

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #23, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 19:13:39 EST

Contents:
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Mike Jackson)
  Re: --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server 
errors... (Edwin Calimbo)
  Cannot access some sites (Eitan Mizrotsky)
  Gig drivers (Heidi Hornbacher)
  Re: No FTP, No Telnet, No Samba (John Thompson)
  Linux in a Token Ring network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: .bash_profile (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Sechylmanos)
  Re: Why Does Linux Networking Suck So Badly ? (Sechylmanos)
  Re: Funky ipfwadm/sendmail interaction (Andrzej Filip)
  wanted. : emulation fort ms exchange ("Bernhard Bradatsch")
  Re: SAMBA SHARING (Brian Gilman)
  Re: Weird 3COM Card Problem - Help Please (tmf)
  Re: pop3 deamon? .. still having trouble (Brent Rader)



From: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 23:00:29 GMT

There's a site at redhat rawhide.redhat.com, but I don't know if they have it
there yet.

John K wrote:

 Hello,

 Can somebody compile the new kernel in a RPM package for "newbies", please.

 I have RedHat 5.2 and I look forward for something easy to upgrade without
 making it a pain, or making a mistake as a result to have to re-install
 again Linux for the 400th time.

 Please make a RPM package of the new kernel.

 Thanks.

--
--mikej
-=-
mike jackson
is coordinator @ qualimetrics, inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.qualimetrics.com



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Calimbo)
Subject: Re: --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server 
errors...
Date: 27 Jan 99 09:35:48 GMT

Jeremy Fowler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Ok, here is the situation (please, it looks long but you may find it
: amusing)...

: I am trying to use a RH Linux 5.2 Box as a email server for our office.
: Simple you think... Well, I had everything installed I could see my ISP
: nameservers and I could ping the hell out of anything out there. I then set
: up DNS and BIND so that the Linux box was it's own primary name server for
: our domain, everything went great (well, after reading O'Reilly DNS and BIND
: 2nd Edition, and plenty of posts to DNS newsgroups!). Then I set up sendmail
: (also not an easy task, and I now have that wonderful O'Reilly book in my
: collection, plus many a postings to sendmail newsgroups, so many I'm on
: first name basis with Claus Assmann (kidding)). Well all was working
: wonderfully lastnight, All I had to do was wait for our ISP to get off their
: ass and edit their  DNS entries for our domain to point to the appropriate
: places. Then I noticed something strange. When I was logged in as root, I
: had total network access, but If I logged in as any other user I lost
: network connection (outside my domain, I could still ping hosts on our LAN,
: but all outside networks were unreachable). No big deal, I figured I would
: figure it out later. Now today, for some strange reason it does it for root
: too. For the first couple of minutes after I would reboot and login as root
: I had internet access and could ping my nameserver, but if I tried pinging
: anywhere else I got a "Network is unreachable" error. Then if I tried
: pinging my nameserver again it too gave the "Network is unreachable" error.
: Well, I ruled out my ISP because the computer I am writing you is using the
: same network (nameserver, gateway, and ISDN connection, but different
: username and it's a Win98 PC), I can ping, www surf, and read and send email
: and news. So, its not the ISP. Well, I thought that I did something wrong on
: the DNS setup, or deleted something important accidentally So I wiped clean
: and reinstalled. That got me nowhere, now I have to set up DNS and sendmail
: again. It is now set up as a cashing only DNS server (default initial DNS
: setup) and It's doing pretty much the same thing as before. As soon as I
: reboot and login as root I can ping my nameservers (ISP's) and everything on
: the local LAN. but if I try to ping a www site (www.cnn.com,
: www.internic.com , etc...) I get  "unknown host" errors and if when I first
: login after a reboot I can nslookup and get answers, but if I ping a www
: site I get a "unknown host" error and then if I try nslookup again I get:

: *** Can't find server name for address 209.160.218.2: No response from
: server
: *** Can't find server name for address 209.160.218.3: No response from
: server
: *** Default servers are not available
: Lets recap: :-(

: So, It looks like it's the ISP, but I'm using those exact nameservers
: (209.160.218.2 and 3) on this Win 98 PC and its doing fine. I've reinstalled
: RH and everything was set back to default settings, and it's doing the same
: thing as before, so it may or may not be the RH box. I've replace 

Linux-Networking Digest #24

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #24, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 20:13:54 EST

Contents:
  Re: ppp-server problem (Josh Gentry)
  Re: PPP internet connection problem (Luca Filipozzi)
  automount / umount SMB partition (Kelvin Leung)
  Re: Simple? Sendmail newbie question (Wile E. Coyote)
  Re: Win95-Linux VPN (Dai to)
  Re: IPX/PPP Client Problem (Andy Neverowsky)
  Re: RJ-45 network needs hub ? (David 'Septimus' De Ridder)
  Compex RL100/ATX and kernel 2.1.x (Nenad Ocelic)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Dan Nguyen)
  Re: machine crash (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Telnet stops working when Internet connection goes down (Matthew Willcock)
  Re: PPP connects but I don't get out anywhere (Darren Greer)
  DNS caching server on PPP router, elegant solution needed ("Victor Chou")
  Re: is my system overloaded? (Stefan Sundkvist)
  Re: This is Linux, not Windows, so why not superior flexibility AND idiot-friendly? 
(NF Stevens)
  Re: Adding Routes (David Efflandt)
  PC linux accessible through Mac (Matthieu Buchs)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Gentry)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: ppp-server problem
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:23:35 -0800

You may want to consult my document on dialin server setup, although I do
not cover the use of chap.


http://www.swcp.com/~jgentry/dialin2.html




*** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ***

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: PPP internet connection problem
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 16:18:04 -0800

In article 78g8m0$3uk$[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
 Help!  I got my modem to dial my ISP but that's about it.  I can't seem to
 connect to their DNS, let alone accessing via a web browser.
 
 my /etc/resolv.conf is as follows:
 search .
 nameserverxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   (I obtain the nameserver from my ISP)
Looks OK. Don't think you need the search directive.

 Connect:ppp0---/dev/modem
 local IP address  ###.###.###.###
 Remote IP address ###.###.###.###
 
 
 Everything seemed good.  Once connected, I tried to ping the DNS (specified
 in /etc/resolv.conf) both by IP and my host.  Neither one worked.  It just
 hung.   Do I need to set my default route in my routing
 table?  Did I enter the nameserver incorrectly or did I enter it in the
 wrong file?  Please email and thanks in advance.
That's exactly right. You need to set the default route to the remote IP 
address.

Try this command, "traceroute -n xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx"and see where your 
machine wants to send the packets.

Hope this helps,

Luca
-- 
Luca Filipozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelvin Leung)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: automount / umount SMB partition
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:41:10 -0700

Hello,

I got a RH 5.1 server running as Samba server for windoze machines. And my
own Linux workstation is on the same network. I would like to know how to
setup the automount of Samba partition from the Samba server (do something
in /etc/fstab?). So that I don't need to smbmount and smbunmount everytime
I reboot the system... Thanks

Kelvin

--

Subject: Re: Simple? Sendmail newbie question
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wile E. Coyote)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 18:17:52 -0600

Thanks to everybody who responded, I'm going off to "try" some things now...

In article uDg#lpuR#[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...

OK, my Linux server is up  running RedHat 5.1, with kernel version 2.0.35.
Now I want to get sendmail setup.  I would like to fix an immediate problem 
that I have first, and learn about the inner workings of sendmail later, if 
possible, so here's my question:

I want to set up my server so that an outside user can use it as an SMTP 
server.  It works fine as a POP server, but when I try to send mail through it 
from another computer using it as the SMTP server, it says that it doesn't 
like 
my destination address, and it only seems to take destinations that are on 
that 
server itself, ie. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Ideas?  I am trying to get this piece working first, then I'll end up buying a 
good book on sendmail later and end up tweaking it more extensively

TIA,
Scott



--

From: Dai to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win95-Linux VPN
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:21:00 -0800

  Yes it can be done, but how depends on what type of a connection you are
looking for.  Is just a telnet session? If so look at
http://www.ssh.fi/sshprotocols2/index.html
  If you want more you might look at http://www.redcreek.com. Red Creek is a
great out of the box vpn solution, but just bring money.

Wayne

Eric Rossing wrote:

 We have an office in another city with a few non-networked computers.  Here
 

Linux-Networking Digest #25

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #25, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 22:13:39 EST

Contents:
  Re: How Many Collisions Are Too Many? ("Jay D Ribak")
  netatalk (Samba) problems (Stefan Kluthe)
  Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10 (Bill Unruh)
  [Q] Is there a Linux specific problem with signal and socket ? ("Ronan BARZIC")
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Bob)
  How Many Collisions Are Too Many? (Andrew C. Ohnstad)
  amd and samba/smbmount (Nigel Jewell)
  Re: Security problem ? (fkeeney)
  ssh question... (Andy Skunza)
  Re: authenticating http proxy server? (Lee Shakespeare)
  Re: Nt  linux (Duncan Simpson)
  Samba - PPP - Ethernet Question (James Wenger)
  Home network: What hardware on client and server? (Chris Bitmead)
  trouble with ppp and PAP ("Jonas")
  Re: Cable Modem on Linux - use dhcpcd 1.3.17 (Jeffrey T Kowalczyk)
  Re: PAP problems (David Efflandt)
  Re: PC linux accessible through Mac (Brian Gilman)
  IP Aliasing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: two ip addresses / two gateways / one machine? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Redhat 5.2 PPP-server  win95 (Clifford Kite)



From: "Jay D Ribak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How Many Collisions Are Too Many?
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 08:49:06 -0500

That is a lot of collisions...far too many for only 2 stations on a small
hub.   One thing to take a look at is the duplex settings on the network
cards.   I had a similar problem on a much larger network recently, where it
turned out that the switch I was uplinking to was set to full-duplex and my
hub, and later switch, were only set to half.   I had about a 5% collision
rate.

Good Luck
jay R.

Andrew C. Ohnstad wrote in message ...
Having never ran any kind of network before I really don't know if this
is bad or not...

[andy@headunit /sbin]$ ./ifconfig
loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Bcast:127.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:7168  Metric:1
  RX packets:869 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:869 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 08:00:2B:E4:4A:9D
  inet addr:192.168.1.2  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:59102 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:52914 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:12314
  Interrupt:10 Base address:0x8000

[andy@headunit /sbin]$


12300 collisions out of almost 6 packets?  20%  Is that considered
high?  The hardware involved is:

Cards:  1) Digital Equipment Tulip compatable built in Ethernet card.
Built into a Digital Alpha.  This is running Linux 2.0.35.
 2) Netgear FA310TX PCI.  In a Intel Pentium with windows 98.

Just running TCP/IP.

Brand new store bought cables, and a Linksys 5 port hub.

Any tips or ideas?

Thanks!
Andrew



--

From: Stefan Kluthe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netatalk (Samba) problems
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:20:23 +0100

Hello,

I have some questions/problems with my RedHat 5.2 / Samba 1.9.18 /
netatalk 1.42 configuration:

1) I have a folder "secret". I manage the access to this volume for the
PC clients via /etc/group and the smb.conf file. Only the group SECRET
has RW-permissions to this folder. This works fine. A MAC client has a
.AppleVolumes file in his home directory with an entry for this volume.
But he has no W-permissions, because netatalk sees only his dafault
group (i.e. USERS). How can I change this?

2) If I copy very large files (15 MB) from a Linux box to a local disk
of a MAC, the MAC kills the connection to the Linuxserver after a long
time. Is there a solution for this timeout problem?

Thanks

Stefan Kluthe



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10
Date: 28 Jan 1999 01:22:48 GMT

In [EMAIL PROTECTED] James Carlson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That means that your syslogd is misconfigured.  You'll need to send
*.debug to the file.

pppd reports on the daemon log and various loglevels.
daemon.*/var/log/messages
should already be in your syslog.conf. In fact the messages he is gettin
show that it is there.

The problem here is most likely in the chat portion, not in PPP.  Run
chat with the "-v" flag to get debug messages in syslog.

ALSO put the line
local2:*/var/log/messages
into /etc/syslog.conf.
It is a well hidden secret that chat uses the local2 logging . (The only
place I found it was in the source code.)


--

From: "Ronan BARZIC" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: 

Linux-Networking Digest #26

1999-01-27 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #26, Volume #10  Wed, 27 Jan 99 23:13:31 EST

Contents:
  Re: Funky ipfwadm/sendmail interaction (Mark Shuttleworth)
  disabling source routing with token ring (Lee Shakespeare)
  ftp from behind a masquerading router (Michael Kifer)
  Has anyone tried IE5 for Unix (Bow Shock Wave)
  Re: How to get Linux to recognize "built-in" Ethernet? ("raytronx")
  PAP problems (Steve Vertigan)
  Re: Nt  linux (Tom Reinertson)
  Problems to set up router (Christoph Gaitzsch)
  Re: Network at home, please help (Viljo Marrandi)
  Re: trouble with ppp and PAP (Clifford Kite)
  Re: having trouble configuring mgetty (David Efflandt)
  No Telnet, No FTP, No Samba ("David Francis")
  ISP Proxy (wlg15562)
  Re: Setting up ISP and need help (Raymond Doetjes)
  Re: Dial-Up Server (Clifford Kite)



From: Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Funky ipfwadm/sendmail interaction
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:40:39 GMT

Hiya

Thanks!

Andrzej Filip wrote:

 Mark Shuttleworth wrote:

  I have a problem with a system that sends mail from a machine that uses
  ipfwadm to filter packets. The symptom is that mail to newer sendmail
  instances fails to go through, because the "sendmail can't write" a
  particular welcome line. I can manually simulate the SMTP conversation
  over a telnet connection from my machine but real mail won't budge.
 
  I used tcpdump to sniff packets coming to and from the machine. Here's
  what I saw.
 
  As soon as my machine connects to the remote SMTP server I see the SYN
  packets being exchanged. Then I see a packet from a high port on the
  remote server to the auth port on my machine. Then I see an ICMP packet
  from my machine to the remote machine that says "tcp post auth
  unreachable". If I do the same exercise on a different machine I don't
  see the ICMP packet.
 
  What's potting? Any ideas? If anyone wants I could send a full packet
  dump of that conversation and a similar dump of the same conversation on
  a different machine that works without a hitch.

 You have seen bug/"random feature" of BSD (?).
 It has been described in comp.mail.sendmail postings.

 Quick fix: enable access  to your auth port
 with no auth demon running.
 You will get
 TCP SYNC
 TCP RSET
 instead of
 TCP SYNC
 ICMP unreachable

 On my machine I apply the fix for short time whenever
 I have such problems.

 --
 Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip
 home e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Mark Shuttleworth
Thawte Certification



--

From: Lee Shakespeare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disabling source routing with token ring
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:43:12 +

Hi Folks.

I'm trying to connect a linux box (2.0.35) to a rather large token ring
network and am encountering a few problems.  The network has a number of
3com token ring hubs, which are joined by a 3com 7000 ATM switch.  I can
see all the machines on the local token ring, but none on the other
rings.  An NT box which sits on the same ring can see the whole network.

I've been told by the people in the know, that I need to "disable source
route routing" for the token ring card.  A quick usenet search has
turned up little, source routing hadn't used to work, but does now.  The
source code doesn't make an explicit references to it, and I'm no kernel
hacker.  

Does anyone know how I can disable source routeing for the token ring
card?  

Lee.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   :   Lee Shakespeare

--

From: Michael Kifer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ftp from behind a masquerading router
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 02:36:47 GMT

The ftp "dir" commands hangs when I do ftp from a machine connected to a
masquerading linux router. This happens even if the router allows all access
like this:

/sbin/ipfwadm -I -p accept
/sbin/ipfwadm -O -p accept
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p accept

/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a masquerade  -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0

"dir" does work if I issue it from an ftp session on the router itself.

Will appreciate any clues.

Michael Kifer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bow Shock Wave)
Subject: Has anyone tried IE5 for Unix
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 15:43:02 GMT

After kicking the cat and going to www.microsoft.com
Has anyone tried the new microsoft Internet Explorer 5
for Un*x yet, Is this a MS Trojan Horse, or are they letting their
crappy code slip, so they can condemn to death people who rip
the source code, as it would not be GNU type software ???

--

From: "raytronx" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
athome.users-unix,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to get Linux to recognize "built-in" Ethernet?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 

Linux-Networking Digest #33

1999-01-28 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #33, Volume #10  Thu, 28 Jan 99 14:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: AppleTalk, papd times out. (nobody)
  Re: Samba - PPP - Ethernet Question (David Efflandt)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Dan Nguyen)
  GTE flamed linux for BillG (Bob)
  Re: how to setup a driver for sis6326 display card in RH5.2 Linux? (John Ko)
  Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist
  Problems with NFS between Red Hat client and Solaris server (Brian Borchers)
  PCI Network card problem ("aa")
  IPSec for Linux ("Levon Barker")
  Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG (Jim Harper)
  Re: Ancient token ring network. (S. Parkerson)
  Re: network card. (Jeff Holloway)
  Re: ftp from behind a masquerading router (Jeff Holloway)
  Re: 3c905tx 10/100 Redhat 5.2 (bgeer)
  Re: ISA RealTek 8019 (Mark Hahn)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (bgeer)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM ("Jowell S. Sabino")
  Re: ip masquearding and ftp (Maddog)
  POP3 ("Don Stafford")
  forward comm port over tcp/ip ? (Wolfgang)
  IBM PCI Token Ring driver ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: nobody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AppleTalk, papd times out.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:36:23 +0200



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 I did an strace on the papd process, and it is waiting on a socket with
 select() and eventually timing out.  If I do a "Get Printer Configuration"
 from the Mac I get the following:

 Current Status:
 lp is ready and printing

 Configuration Info: (Mon, Jan 25, 1999 4:59 PM)
 Printer Name: hp
 Zone: *
 Product Name: a lot of garbage here
 PostScript Level: 1
 PostScript Version:
 PostScript Revision: -1
 Resolution: 0 dpi
 Total Memory Installed: 1K
 Total Memory Available: 1K
 Binary Communcations Supported: Unknown
 Color Supported: No
 PPD File: LaserWriter

 The mac keeps crashing when it tries to print.  It doesn't look like anything
 ever gets injected into the print spool.  I'd really appreciate any advice
 anyone could offer me on this.

 Thanks in advance,
   Vic.

 ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
 http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

 have you a /etc/printcap
entry

mine

loks like
lp:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp:\
:lp=/dev/null:\
:pl#63:\
:pw#85:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:\
:sf:\
:if=/etc/atalk/filters/ifpap:\
:of=/etc/atalk/filters/ofpap:


but i print to a printer on the localtalk
if you want that you also need a .paprc file in the spooling directory

if your printer is on the paralellport
change lp to that





--

From: David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Samba - PPP - Ethernet Question
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:37:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 1/27/99, 9:03:17 AM, James Wenger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote=
=20
regarding Samba - PPP - Ethernet Question:


 Firstly I'd like to appologise for the cross post
 (comp.os.linux.networking and comp.protocols.smb)

 I have a network of Windoze and Linux Boxes, and am trying to migrate
 all the windows stuff to Linux.
 So far proxy stuff, dialup server and dial in server has moved. I am
 however having a problem with Samba and NT/9x boxes that dial in.

 On the local network, Windoze and Linux talk happily with smb, when I
 disconnect a windows box from the local net an get it to dial in to=20
the
 server, all authentication is fine, ppp starts, I can telnet, ftp,=20
ping
 etc from the windows machine to all the unix machines on the net, but
 none of the SMB Stuff works.

 After trawling through the FAQ's and HOWTO's I could not find anything=

 specific to my problem.

 I am relatively new to this so it may be something simple thats=20
screwing
 up, any help would be greatly appreciated.

 Thanks
 -James

 P.S. if anyone can help, can you cc me as well as the main post to the=

 newsgroup as I cannot always check the groups

The problem is that even if I use proxyarp with eth0 as local IP for=20
pppd, and the remote registers with WINS, I could not browse the=20
remote because samba broadcasts instead of using its own wins.  For=20
example samba as browsemaster broadcasts 192.168.1.255, but that only=20
goes to eth0 and the dialin on 192.168.1.20 never sees it.  The remote=20
can access others by name, but samba can't find the remote, even=20
though it is in wins.dat.

My solution was to use the same machine name and login name for the=20
remote connection.  Using a combination of ip-up.local, a tmp file and=20
auth-up, I would add the remote username (machine name) and IP to=20
/etc/lmhosts.  Then samba could find the remote and address it=20
directly instead of broadcast.

This was much easier for a modem hung on a Cisco router.  All I had to=20
do was add the remote IP as ip-helper-address, the remote received all=20
subnet broadcasts and showed up in Network Neighboorhood of the=20
locals.  The question is, how 

Linux-Networking Digest #34

1999-01-28 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #34, Volume #10  Thu, 28 Jan 99 16:13:43 EST

Contents:
  Re: PPP dial-up connection with RH5.2 (Gregory Propf)
  Re: ftp from behind a masquerading router (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack? (fkeeney)
  Re: IP Aliasing (Brian McCauley)
  Re: ip masquearding and ftp (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Another Newbie PPP question (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Routing Question (NEWBIE) (Brian McCauley)
  printing from slackware - nt hp lj III (Ryan Speed)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Keith Peterson")
  NTP on Linux (John Brookes)
  Re: "host name lookup failure" error (Chris)
  Re: HELP !! Default Run Level goes wrong, How can I make the linux sector work 
again? ("Jürgen Exner")
  Re: socket error (what is?) (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Matt Kressel)
  Re: need help? (David Efflandt)
  How does RH 5.1 play in (non-DNS) WINS LAN? (Randy Hayman)



From: Gregory Propf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: PPP dial-up connection with RH5.2
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 02:43:22 GMT

steve wrote:
 
 I recently installed RH5.2. I used netcfg to configure my ppp connection
 as instructed by RH support, I believe everything there to be right. I
 click activate and the modem dials out, connects and then hangs up in
 about 20-30 seconds.
 
 First, where is the log file so I can look at it.(Debug is enabled)
 Second, my ISP says (I don't think they really know for sure) they don't
 use PAP and alas I have tried it with PAP and without to the same end.
 
 Please help, it's getting a little frustrating and I'm about to give up.
 I tired of trying to decipher the endless trail of FAQ's and HOWTO's and
 mini-HOWTO's and man pages.

I recently posted with the exact same problem under 5.1.  The modem
would dial out and then hang up after 20-30 seconds.  When I changed the
IRQ of the modem from 4 to 5 (this is where it was in Windows which did
not have the hang-up problem) the modem began to respond to AT commands
much faster.  I haven't had the chance to verify that this is why the
modem was hanging up but my theory is that the misconfigured IRQ was
causing the modem buffer to fill up and then the thing simply gave up
and dropped the link.  Why it worked *at all* on the wrong IRQ is still
puzzling.  Hope this helps even though the original message I posted
seems to have been aged out. - Greg

BTW - the command to change IRQ 
"setserial /dev/your.modem.device irq arg" - as root.




-- 
 
-- homepage: http://members.home.net/gregp/ --

"I wanted plutonium, not Beanie Babies..." 
  - Sadaam Hussein, in a letter to Santa Claus.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: ftp from behind a masquerading router
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 19:05:27 -0800

In article 78oifu$660$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
 The ftp "dir" commands hangs when I do ftp from a machine connected to a
 masquerading linux router. This happens even if the router allows all access
 like this:
 
 /sbin/ipfwadm -I -p accept
 /sbin/ipfwadm -O -p accept
 /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p accept
 
 /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a masquerade  -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
 
 "dir" does work if I issue it from an ftp session on the router itself.
 
 Will appreciate any clues.
 
 Michael Kifer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
 http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
 
you need to use the ip_masq_ftp module to do active (vs passive) ftp

-- 
Luca Filipozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: fkeeney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 09:39:33 -0800

I manage several firewalls at different locations on the Internet. The hosts that
are most commonly attacked are those that run name or web servers. My name and
web servers are probed several times a day the other hosts are rarely touched.

On Linux it's important to run ipfwadm AND log all the denied traffic.

Here is a sample of a setup I did on a cable modem:

http://www.pasadena.net/linux/linuxsecure.html

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I beleive that most of the netbios name  (udp 137)
traffic you see is a result of MS Windows doing a netbios name lookup on your
host.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't know what this all means. If the probes resulted negative on httpsd,
 ftpd and netbios, why do they continue so frequently? This gives me the
 impression that there is something else that keep some people trying over and
 over.


--

From: Brian McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Aliasing
Date: 28 Jan 1999 19:11:13 +

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Does anyone know if there is a maximum number of IP 

Linux-Networking Digest #35

1999-01-28 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #35, Volume #10  Thu, 28 Jan 99 17:13:38 EST

Contents:
  Re: DHCP Linux server and subnets help (Stephen Carville)
  Re: forward comm port over tcp/ip ? (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Some recent lessons for those going from NT to linux. ("Keith G. Murphy")
  Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ? (David Efflandt)
  Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack? ("donoli")
  Re: POP3 (Matt Kressel)
  Having trouble with simple filtering firewall on Linux...help(!) 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: PPP Setup for Uswest.net Dial in (Mike Horwath)
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Darren Ford)
  Re: My Stupid little routing tutorial - Works for me (HTML File - I hope) - 
mslrt.htm (0/1) (Dark Knight)
  Re: Routing questios (M. Buchenrieder)
  Re: HELP: pppd drops after exactly 1 hour - (long) (Colin Guillas)



From: Stephen Carville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP Linux server and subnets help
Date: 28 Jan 1999 04:20:34 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I am setting up a DHCP server on Redhat 5.1 running
 ISC DHCPD V2-BETA-1-PATCHLEVEL-6

I'm using the same version so maybe I can help.

 Our network has a router that seperates our class C ip address in to 4
 segments.
 
 The subnetting of each segment occurs every so many IP numbers, fo example:
 
 xxx.xxx.xxx.32 is segment A with a mask of 255.255.255.224
 The port for that router segment is xxx.xxx.xxx.33 (i.e. the client's gateway
 for that subnet).
 
 and so on.
 
 I set-up the linux server on segment A, and configured a couple of clients to
 test it. They have no problems getting IP addresses and info from the server.
 But when I have a machine, on say segment C of the router, it doesn't work.
 

[conf file snipped]

 When monitoring the server in debug mode I notice it seems to only be
 listening to it's own subnet and none of the others.

DHCP cannot cross a router without help.  This is inherent in the
protocol.  You need to configure your router to pass the DHCP packets to
your server.  If that is not practical, then set up a DHCP-relay agent on
each of the subnets you are serving.  See "man dhcrelay" for help on
setting up a relay agent

-- 
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Management: The art of hiring intelligent, skilled individuals and then
ignoring their advice.

--

From: Matt Kressel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: forward comm port over tcp/ip ?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:42:26 GMT

Wolfgang wrote:
 
 ok, this is what my setup looks like: there is a 486 PC running
 linux with a modem connected.  I also hooked up my notebook
 to that machine with ethernet. I use this box for dialing out
 (ip masquearding), it just workes fine.
 What's missing is a posibility to use winfax with my notebook
 wihout running to the modem, plugging cables in and out and so on.
 I thought if there was program for win9x and linux that
 tunnels a comm-port over the network, why shouldn't it work ?
 It would look like that there is a virtual comm port on the notebook,
 say com5 or whatever, that transmits any i/o data over tcp/ip to a
 daemon listening on the linux machine. There again the data is
 forwarded to the real comm port with the modem connected - sounds
 reasonable, no ?
 Thanks for any suggestions on how to realize this idea.
 


Look into HylaFax.  It is a faxing server for Linux that allows remote
connections.  There is a Windows 9x client for Hylafax too.  It just
shows up as a normal printer under windows.

-Matt

-- 
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-  Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY -+
+-  TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 +

--

From: "Keith G. Murphy" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some recent lessons for those going from NT to linux.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:26:29 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rich Mycroft wrote:
 
 Well, being in the newbie cateory thought I'd pass along three things I've
 learned in this last week.
 
 1)  Linksys cards do not seem to behave well under linux networking.  Stick
 with 3com or intel as these have been just fine.

Hmmm.  Had a devil of a time getting my 3Com 3c905b-tx working with
Linux (had to get the Becker driver off the web), but my Linksys Ether16
was easy to configure with Debian.  (I *did* need to run the included
SETUP.EXE from DOS to make it non-PNP).  They both seem to be running
flawlessly.

You make me curious: what problems have you had?  Far as I can tell, the
Linksys stuff is straight NE2000-compatible; they now even advertise
Linux-compatibility on the box.

--

From: David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:28:23 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL 

Linux-Networking Digest #36

1999-01-28 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #36, Volume #10  Thu, 28 Jan 99 18:13:57 EST

Contents:
  Diald, PPPD Timeout (Glenn Buric)
  Re: Linux -- Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Stephen Carville)
  Redhat 5.1A Toshiba Libretto70CT...and a Kingmac PCMCIA Network 
card..wowwhat a mess. (JamesLay)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Jeff Holloway)
  Re: Can't Telnet To Linux 5.2 from MS workstation (Stephen Carville)
  Distributed Security (Tishina Syndicate)
  Re: multihome on one ethernet card ? how? (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Is there anything like NT's TRUST RELATIONSHIPS in Linux/Unix ? (James Youngman)
  Cable Modems and Optimum Online (Matt Kressel)
  Re: configuration of eth0  ifconfig (Chris)
  help with script to temporarily reconfig net (jamie)



From: Glenn Buric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Diald, PPPD Timeout
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:54:35 +

I setup the pppd and diald according to the HOWTO's but I can't seem to
get diald working correctly.  pppd works okay, but only when I kill the
diald.  When I run diald and attempt to ping an internet host, the modem

dials connects, and then terminates after about 20 seconds.  I've spent
all weekend trying different configurations.  Any help would be greatly
appreciated.

Here's an some output from my message log file (configuration files
follow):

Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: ATDT2372203^M^M
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: CARRIER 26400^M
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: ^M
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: PROTOCOL: LAP-M^M
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: ^M
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: CONNECT -- got it
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: send (^M)
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]: expect (ogin:)
Jan 24 17:24:44 dilbert chat[340]:  38400^M
Jan 24 23:24:45 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 198.41.0.10,53
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: MCSNet Chicago Unified^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: (hit enter alone for password)^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: mcs - MCSNet Cluster Machines^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: ccs - Chicago Computer Society BBS^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: ^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: OR enter user ID for SLIP/PPP
Session^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: ^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: ^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: login: -- got it
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: send (gjb^M)
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: expect (assword:)
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]:  ^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: login: gjb^M
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: Password: -- got it
Jan 24 17:24:46 dilbert chat[340]: send (x^M)
Jan 24 23:24:46 dilbert diald[300]: Running pppd (pid = 341).
Jan 24 17:24:47 dilbert kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Jan 24 17:24:47 dilbert kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Jan 24 17:24:47 dilbert kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Jan 24 17:24:47 dilbert kernel: registered device ppp0
Jan 24 23:24:47 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

62 packet 255.255.255.0,1060 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:24:49 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 128.9.0.107,53
Jan 24 23:24:52 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

62 packet 255.255.255.0,1062 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:24:56 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

65 packet 255.255.255.0,1063 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:24:57 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 192.33.4.12,53
Jan 24 23:25:02 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

62 packet 255.255.255.0,1064 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:25:05 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 192.203.230.10,53
Jan 24 23:25:13 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 193.0.14.129,53
Jan 24 23:25:21 dilbert diald[300]: filter ignored rule 24 proto 17 len
45 packet 255.255.255.0,53 = 202.12.27.33,53
Jan 24 23:25:22 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

62 packet 255.255.255.0,1065 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:25:36 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

65 packet 255.255.255.0,1066 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:25:41 dilbert diald[300]: filter accepted rule 25 proto 17 len

65 packet 255.255.255.0,1067 = 192.160.127.90,53
Jan 24 23:25:47 dilbert diald[300]: pppd startup timed out. Check your
pppd options. Killing pppd.
Jan 24 23:25:47 dilbert diald[300]: Nonzero exit status (1) on command
'/sbin/ifconfig sl0 205.164.12.62 pointopoint  netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu

1500 up'
Jan 24 23:25:47 dilbert diald[300]: Nonzero exit status (1) on command
'/sbin/route add  metric 1  dev sl0'
Jan 24 23:25:47 dilbert diald[300]: child process 341 terminated with
signal 2
Jan 24 23:25:48 dilbert 

Linux-Networking Digest #37

1999-01-28 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #37, Volume #10  Thu, 28 Jan 99 21:13:40 EST

Contents:
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Pablo Bryan)
  ethernet card setup problems ("Chris Smith")
  Linksys 10/100 (Alvaro Garriga)
  Can't telnet (wierd) (Wade Olsen)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM ("Jim Ross")
  Re: Blind Linux Boxes (Jim Roberts)
  Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10 (Moe)
  Telnet problem on home network (Mike Hammer)
  2 Intel Ether Express 16 Cards? (MR)
  dialing out while mgetty is at work (Josh Gentry)
  Re: Linux in a Token Ring network ("Michael Knigge")
  NIS: Redhat 5.2 client, SunOS Server?? (Mark Morley)
  Internal Networking,HELP !,.please (Robert Verdicchio)
  Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (graywolf)
  LEAF ISA Ethernet Adaptor. ("Jonathan")
  Re: ISA RealTek 8019 (Pat Gallion)
  configuring diamond modems (Christopher Huisman)
  Re: get MX record (Raymond Doetjes)
  Networking 2 win98 boxes and a linux box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  insmod failed,net card doesn't work. ("HappyGuy")
  insmod failed,net card doesn't work. ("HappyGuy")
  Routing questios ("Hamlet")
  Re: 2 Intel Ether Express 16 Cards? ("Hamlet")
  Ethernet and Redundant Networking (Peter Seiderer)



From: Pablo Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM
Date: 28 Jan 1999 05:39:25 GMT

Dude you are the Man!!! thanks a lot for your help!!


--

From: "Chris Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,de.comp.os.unix.linux.hardware
Subject: ethernet card setup problems
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:06:29 -0500

I am trying to get linux to load my ethernet card.  And at several places it
responds "eth0:  unkown device"
Also, I don't see a message about it loading when i type "dmesg"  I do have
the "eth0 eepro100" line in my conf.modules file.  Also the network
configuration menu in redhat reports the device as inactive.  Then i
activate it close the window and go back to it and it again says inactive.
Does anyone know what my problem is?

Thanks

please also reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: Alvaro Garriga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linksys 10/100
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:39:43 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello everyone.

I am new to Linux and I am having some problems detecting the network card.

I have a linksys LTE100TX network card but Red Hat ( 5.01 ) installation did not
pick it up
how can I configure Linux to use the card ?

Note: The chip on the card says Linksys

Thanks in advance.




--

From: Wade Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't telnet (wierd)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:29:54 -0800

I have a wierd problem. From my Windows95 machine I can ping the linux
machine, send dhcp requests and get dhcp server responses, but I can not
telnet to the machine. If I run tcpdump on the linux machine I see the
packet come in but nothing goes out. If I run inetd in debug mode I
don't see any activity to make me think inetd ever sees the packets. I
have no ipfwadm rules and the default is accept for input, output and
forward.

Any ideas?

Wade



--

From: "Jim Ross" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:43:17 -0500


Dan Nguyen wrote in message 78oa1p$eb9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In alt.os.linux John K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Can somebody compile the new kernel in a RPM package for "newbies",
please.

: I have RedHat 5.2 and I look forward for something easy to upgrade
without
: making it a pain, or making a mistake as a result to have to re-install
: again Linux for the 400th time.

It's not that hard to compile a kernel.  There is no advantage with
having someone else compile your kernel, because you won't gain any
advantages.

Well upgrading your distribution to accept the new kernel would be done for
him if he waited for rpms or the next distribution.  I have error messages
from a rpm that wouldn't install.
Jim


--
   Dan Nguyen| There is only one happiness in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   life, to love and be loved.
http://www.cse.msu.edu/~nguyend7 |   -George Sand




--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: Blind Linux Boxes
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:33:10 GMT

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tom Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Greetings,
 
 I have two Linux (redhat) boxes setting side by side, both connected to
 the same hub, both running on the same class c which is devoted to these
 
 machines. Machine # 1 has an ip of .2 while machine # 2 has an ip of
 .50. They are not separated by subnets. Both machines can see the
 outside world and machine # 2 can ping and nslookup domains on machine
 number 1 while machine # 

Linux-Networking Digest #38

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #38, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 00:13:51 EST

Contents:
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (Bow Shock Wave)
  Re: Routing questios (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: ping self ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: web hosting  e-commerce software (Duncan Simpson)
  Re: TCP/IP help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linksys 10/100 (John Strange)
  Re: Routing questios ("Hamlet")
  Re: SuSE Linux 6.0  Routing ("Hamlet")
  Re: insmod failed,net card doesn't work. ("Hamlet")
  in.telnetd problem !! (Lu-min)
  SuSE 5.x and EzPPP (Tim Spence)
  Re: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook (Felix Lam)
  Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10 (Andrew Sun - UCE revokable account)
  Recommendations Regarding PCMCIA NIC Replacement? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  I know it's been asked a million times... (Jay Copeland)
  knfsd stable (compared to nfs-server-2.2beta40) ? (Ulrich Leodolter)
  Re: FTP SERVER (Scallica)
  IP Masquerade like techniques in Solaris? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Why would X not work after istalling a NIC? ("Christopher G. Petty")



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bow Shock Wave)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:42:47 GMT

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:56:17 -0700, Brad Cuppy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


%I would go with Red Hat (RH) over Caldera.
%RH is suppose to be very friendly with newbies.
%I personally use Slakware and used RH one time
%but being a Unix user for several years I don't
%car much for RH which is personal taste.
%
%
% Brad

Are you saying Redhat is a more user friendly distribution ?
than Caldera, so that would make Red hat easier that opening a box
of chocolate, 

so just how easy is Red hat over Caldera, this will be a good topic.

please reply


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Routing questios
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 01:44:59 -0800

In article 78pa72$amo$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
 Hi !
 
 I Finally got my two network cards working. Thanx for the help so far. But
 now on to the real work.
 I'll try to explain once more my goals.
 I have a Linux box with two NIC's.
 First is a PCNet32 card (10mbit) with IP 192.168.1.1.
 Second is a 3c905B (100mbit) with IP 192.168.2.1.
 
 as you can see I would like two have two segments, a 10 mbit and a 100 mbit.
 
 Here comes the big questions:
 -what do I have to do to make that all PC's (all win95) connected in the
 10mbit area (network 192.168.1.0) can browse the network neighbourhood so
 that they can 'see' all PC's in the 100 mbit area (network 192.168.2.0)
 Note that I need to do file sharing accross the two networks, so a ping is
 not enough, I need to be able to resolve the computer names and shares.
 
 Well that's it for now, If you can help me in some way PLEASE do not
 hesitate. I really need it :)
 
 bub eye
 Wouter
 
 (oh for personal reply's you can reach me at [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 
 
This is more of a comp.os.ms-windows.networking post...

Anyway, here goes.

In each segment, a segment master browser (SegMB) will be elected. When a 
user double clicks on Network Neighbourhood, the computers shown are a 
result of querying the SegMB for the segment browse list. Machines get 
added to the segment browse list when they boot up and send a broadcast 
packet in an attempt to discover or force the election of the SegMB.

So, in your case, you have two segment master browsers. The trick is to 
get them to talk. This is where WINS (and Windows NT Server) come in. 
Segment master browsers ask domain master browsers (DomMB) for the browse 
lists of the other segments. Since the SegMB's have their primary and 
secondary WINS pointing to the same WINS databases, then everything 
eventually gets sync'ed up.

Which means that if you follow the Microsoft way, you will have to set up 
an NT server.

There may be a way to set up the Linux box to forward the broadcast 
packets between the two subnets (kink of defeats the purpose of a router, 
though) so that there is only one segment master browser.

Just to be complete, you could use the LMHOSTS file and set up the 
mappings statically. This will work for you, I believe, but what a 
headache. Adding a server means running around and changing the LMHOSTS 
file (unless you come up with some fancy logon script). Yuk.

hope this helps,

Luca
-- 
Luca Filipozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ping self
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:10:19 GMT

hi,  just wanted to add a few words here. Please correct me if i am wrong. I
think pinging 127.0.0.1 will only pinging the OS portion of it. I mean it
doesnt go through the hardware (network card) itself. Pingign 127.0.0.1 will
still give a good result eventhough the NIC is not inplace at all. In order
to make sure u can ping 192.168.1.*, u 

Linux-Networking Digest #40

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #40, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 05:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: DynIp and Linux ("Christopher G. Petty")
  Re: DNS nameserver problem... ("Christopher G. Petty")
  Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do? ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
  Re: I know it's been asked a million times... (Arthur Corliss)
  Re: Windows login to corporate domain thru Linux server ("Martin 
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Wahlstr=F6m?=")
  Re: Connect to Netware 5 server? How To? ("Fred Barber")
  Re: PAP problem Please Help!! (Partha Sri)
  Cable modems, Dual NICs, and Newbies ("J. Patrick Cline")
  Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do? ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
  demand dialling (chapter 2) (Juergen Fiedler)
  Re: Help, ISP setup! (Kalevi Hautaniemi)
  DHCP Server setup - Complete rookie need help please ("GV Morgon")
  Re: Printing to HP DeskWriter 560C (Charles Mosher)
  connecting to Netware (Jimmy Blair)
  PPPD Problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])



From: "Christopher G. Petty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DynIp and Linux
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:56:19 -0500

Try putting the call to the program in ip-up.local and making the requisite
changes in ip-up? It'll call the script every time you redial.. no more manual
updates.

_CGP

Rob wrote:

 Yeah i have it working fine too, and i rarely re-boot the box or lose
 connection so its not that big of a deal, I just always forget to run it if
 I re-boot and wind up wondering why I cant see my machine from outside
   Someone has to have a script that works to load it automatically on boot.

 Benjohn007 wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 i have it working, but i dont have any scripts that activate the program on
 boot, when the ppp connection is made i just run dynipadmin and
 dynipclient.,
 for me i just leave my linux box on, and whenever ppp fails (usually 3-4
 days)
 i have it set to redial automatically and dynipclient(which always runs)
 gets
 the correct ip of the machine and forwards it to dynip server.


--

From: "Christopher G. Petty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DNS nameserver problem...
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:36:48 -0500

Heiko:

One quick question, and then I'll get out of your hair..

Are you using NetBEUI on the Winbox? NetBEUI can sometimes cause problems
with DoD setups as you have... Take NetBEUI off the Winbox and see if it
still does it.

Other culprits:
ICQ Notify/ICQ
Netscape AOL IM'er
Mail clients

Check and see if any of this is on your Winbox, and remove it if it is...
your dialup woes should be over..
Oh, and put your DNS back the way it was...

_CGP

Heiko Gerstung wrote:

 Hi !

 I just installed an old 486 as my new internet router for my little
 lan. My main machine is a win95 system (shame on me) and I wanted to
 use this configuration as follows:
 - whenever I start my web browser or telnet client on my win95
 machine, the linux server should connect to the internet and after I
 closed my internet application on the win-machine, linux should
 disconnect.

 It worked fine ! No problem at all. Now my big, big problem is : It
 seems to me that the win95 systems queries a nameserver every couple
 of minutes (and I don't know which program to blame for this!), so
 when I configured my win95-machine with the dns of my provider, every
 couple of minutes my linux server connects to the internet and
 disconnects after some seconds. (with iptraf I found out that the
 win95 machine is really responsible for that!).

 My next step was to set up a cache-only dns on the linux machine in
 order to get rid of these nonsense connects. So I entered the IP of my
 linux machine as the dns server for the win95 system and tried to
 configure named as cache-only.

 The following phenomenon happened : Whenever I tried to use the
 nameserver (e.g. running netscape on my win95 machine and entering
 "www.xyz.com" as URL) I was able to monitor a request from my named to
 the nameserver of my provider (which I configured as a "forwarder" in
 named.boot), but the linux system tried to connect to this nameserver
 on the "sl0" device ! (I'm using ppp0 for my internet connection).

 Named starts with a line "cache zone "" loaded (serial 0)" in
 /var/log/message ...

 Any ideas ? Please send my your replies as an email, too !
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) !!

 Thank you very much !!!

  Bye,
 Heiko

 P.S.: I promise that I'll kick off that win95 machine ASAP ! :-)


--

From: "Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 03:35:05 +1100

G'day Brad and all,


 This is under slakware. In /etc/rc.d/rc.local, I put in
 these lines:

 echo "Setting up IP Masquerading..."
 /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p masquerade

Ok...  This is really *not* recommended.  You've just set it up so any host on the 
internet can
masquerade as your 

Linux-Networking Digest #42

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #42, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 09:13:36 EST

Contents:
  Re: 2 Intel Ether Express 16 Cards? (KevinO)
  Re: help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts??? (Mark Styles)
  mgetty (Mike Grant)
  Re: TCP/IP connectivity for NT and Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  remote lpd on redhat 5.2 (Hans Sandsdalen)
  Setting up squid with a proxy only ISP... (Shane Pearson)
  Re: linux box as a router (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Networking 2 win98 boxes and a linux box (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: Samba over the internet (Yan Seiner)
  Pipeline 75/NAT/dynamic ip (Andrew McIntyre)
  named: No response from Server (Stef)
  NIS  netgroups  more oddities (Ariel Biener)
  PCMCIA died - help with diagnosis (Nick Kew)
  Re: Cable Modem problems (Trent The Thief)
  Re: Routing with 3 network cards (Edwin Calimbo)
  Does LINUX support the Digital VXT 2000/VXT 2000+ terminals? (The Artful Todger)
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? (Mark Styles)
  2.2.0 killed smb??? ("Jon Horner")
  Re: DHCPD multiple nics (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (Brad Cuppy)
  Error compiling Apache 1.3.4 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrea Cerrito))
  Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do? (Brad Cuppy)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (KevinO)
Subject: Re: 2 Intel Ether Express 16 Cards?
Date: 29 Jan 1999 09:37:58 GMT

MR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: OK, I am using RedHat 5.2. I have two Intel Ether Express cards set up
: with different configurations (0x300, irq 11 and 0x270, irq 10). I am
: trying to set the first one to eth0 and the second to eth1 through the
: eexpress module. On bootup, it picks up the first card just fine and
: sets eth0 to it, but it says something similiar to the effect that it is
: delaying eth1 (?). And eth1 never gets set to the 2nd card. My
: /etc/conf.modules is:

: alias eth0 eexpress
: alias eth1 eexpress
: options eexpress io=0x300,0x270 irq=11,10

: Any ideas?? Thanks!

: -Matt

You could try this in your /etc/conf.modules:
alias eth0 eexpress
alias eth1 eexpress
options eth0 -o eexpress-0 io=0x300 irq=11
options eth1 -o eexpress-1 io=0x270 irq=10

An explanation is in the Ethernet-HOWTO.

Hope that helped.

--
-Kevin

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Styles)
Subject: Re: help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts???
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:16:19 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] rambled:
Is there a Linux ftp daemon that will allow me to set up ftp accounts that
will NOT show up in /etc/passwd?  I want to allow clients to ftp but NOT give
them entries in /etc/passwd.

Don't think so. Why don't you want them in /etc/passwd?
Mark Styles
Spam my account, lose your account. Clear enough?
http://www.lambic.co.uk

--

From: Mike Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mgetty
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 05:32:29 +

I am trying to dial into my linux box (kernel 2.2.0) with mgetty
running.  I am dialing in from a win95 machine using hyperterminal.
mgetty answers the line alright, but on the remote machine there's
nothing but garbage ascii characters on the screen...  no login or
anything...  any ideas as to what i did wrong?  I've tried different
terminal emulations on the remote machine, but no luck...

Thanks...
Mike Grant.


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TCP/IP connectivity for NT and Linux
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 12:09:00 GMT

In article 78qiul$le3$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julienna Chu) wrote:
 Guys,

 I've configured the lmhosts.sam and hosts.sam on NT (pc1) to have the
 following entires
 192.168.1.1 pc1 (NT)
 192.168.1.2 pc2 (Linux)

 I put the same into /etc/hosts/ on the linux box (pc2)
 There is no default gateway information for any of them.

 There is also a copy of Win 98 on the linux box with the same TCP/IP
 settings.
 They are both connected on a local hub.

 The Win98 machine (same pc as linux, just different partition)  and NT
 machine can see one another fine via TCP/IP they can both ping to one
 another fine. network neighborhood is ok too. Note: I do not want to use
 SAMBA for the Linux machine.

 When I boot into Linux on the Win 98 pc, the tcp/ip configs are the same
 as they were in the Win 98 system. When I try pinging to the NT machine
 at (192.168.1.1) I see network unreachable. The same for the NT machine
 to the linux pc (192.168.1.2) The only diff is the configuration of the
 network card on the linux pc. In Win 98 it uses 0x300 and 11, but under
 Linux it self configures for 0x300 and 3. When I try switching the 3 to a
 11 the NIC does not even appear to be detectable during the boot up
 process. I have to change it back to 3 for it to reappear.

 So what needs to happen in order for my

 192.168.1.1 pc1 (NT)
 192.168.1.2 pc2 (Linux)

 to see one another through a ping or traceroute so I can telnet from my
 NT server to my Linux box?

 Thanks. Can 

Linux-Networking Digest #44

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #44, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 11:13:53 EST

Contents:
  TULIP CHIPSET: 10/100 Nic Anywhere? ("Will Lyster")
  Re: DNS nameserver problem... (David Kirkpatrick)
  Re: DNS, sysquery and masq (Shoki)
  Problem with ethernet startup: SIOCSADDR etc... (Matthew Callaway)
  Re: TULIP CHIPSET: 10/100 Nic Anywhere? ("Will Lyster")
  lessons learned while setting up masquerading (mike schmelzer)
  Re: Linux - NT RAS + MSCHAP + encryption (James Carlson)



From: "Will Lyster" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TULIP CHIPSET: 10/100 Nic Anywhere?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 11:01:33 -0500

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

===_NextPart_000_001B_01BE4852.11A1FF20
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_001_001C_01BE4852.11A1FF20"


===_NextPart_001_001C_01BE4852.11A1FF20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Looking for a 10/100 NIC that uses the Tulip chipset.

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks

--=20





=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Will Lyster, Director of Operations
Computer Solutions - The Technology Center
Charlottesville, Virginia
804-295-7378888-417-2243
http://www.pc-aid.com



===_NextPart_001_001C_01BE4852.11A1FF20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"
HTMLHEAD
META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-TypeBASE=20
href=3D"file://C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft =
Shared\Stationery\"
STYLEBODY {
BACKGROUND-POSITION: right top; BACKGROUND-REPEAT: no-repeat; COLOR: =
#80; FONT-FAMILY: Century Gothic; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 25px
}
/STYLE

META content=3D'"MSHTML 5.00.0910.1309"' name=3DGENERATOR/HEAD
BODY background=3Dcid:001401be487b$fa706600$[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
bgColor=3D#ff
DIVLooking for a 10/100 NIC that uses the Tulip chipset./DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVPlease respond to A=20
href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVThanks/DIV
DIVBR-- BR/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVBR=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3DBRWill Lyster, Director =
of=20
OperationsBRComputer Solutions - The Technology =
CenterBRCharlottesville,=20
VirginiaBR804-295-7378888-417-2243BRA=20
href=3D"http://www.pc-aid.com"http://www.pc-aid.com/A/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV
DIVnbsp;/DIV/BODY/HTML

===_NextPart_001_001C_01BE4852.11A1FF20==

===_NextPart_000_001B_01BE4852.11A1FF20
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-ID: 001401be487b$fa706600$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
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Linux-Networking Digest #43

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #43, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 11:13:53 EST

Contents:
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Keith Peterson")
  Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG (Bob)
  problem with ppp not connecting (William Parr)
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ("Keith Peterson")
  Re: Dial-on-demand works, now make it stop! ("Keith G. Murphy")
  Re: dhcp does not work with linux 2.2.0-final??? (Bob)
  Re: Apache web page not accessible from outside ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Having trouble with simple filtering firewall on Linux...help(!) ("phantom")
  Re: My Stupid little routing tutorial - Works for me (0/1) (Dark Knight)
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (Bow Shock Wave)
  Re: DHCP on linux and win 95 A (Bob)
  radius ip pool ("cb")
  PLEASE HELP (I HAVE A PATHETIC NEWBIE QUESTION)!! ("Nausherwan I. Malik")
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (YoYo)
  Re: DNS nameserver problem... (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Configuring system to have multiple ethernet addresses (Patrick Sulzle)
  Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Matt Kressel)
  Re: Linux-Router - HELP (Gary Lake)
  Re: NIS server setup not "make"ing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Linux/Win - DNS problem (David Kirkpatrick)



From: "Keith Peterson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:20:04 -0700



I removed the font server in the same manner. Simple!


one question, why?


Well, to be honest, I wasn't really that impressed, and there were some
glitches that I didn't feel like sorting out. So, out it went.



Query a package: "xxx is not installed."
Install it: Installation fails because "xxx is already installed."


This sounds like rpm  ver 2.3, if so, upgrade to the latest, the not
installed/can't install bug was fixed in (IIRC) 2.4.1 'course, you could
have used --force but that's another issue...


I'm not sure what version of RPM I've got - I'm not in front of it at the
moment. However, it came stock with RH 5.2.

When I encounter that issue, I do use --force. Couldn't proceed without it!



--

From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:08:23 -0500

Jim Harper wrote:

 I think the bigger problem is that places like GTE, and the like, do not
 want educated users on their systems. People who can install and run
 Linux are obviously educated and therefore persuaded to go somewhere
 else for service.

 I can understand some of their concern. They're afraid of Linux because
 of it's capabilities. Imagine if you will a spammer setting up his own
 Linux mail server on a high speed cable service.

My conspiracy theory was that GTE was in collusion with BillG. I called
again yesterday and got a different sales rep. She said that win95 works
but win98 doesn't do dhcp competently. Then she said what the other
guy should have, that you're on your own with win98(etc. linux etc.),
instead of saying it won't work and get out of town.

-Bob


--

Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:24:24 +
From: William Parr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with ppp not connecting

I'm having trouble trying to connect to my ISP using the PPP protocol
using RedHat v5.1

I'm trying to connect with the following script
#!/bin/sh
pppd debug /dev/cua0 connect 'chat -t 20 -v "" atdt0570889001 "CONNECT"'

I deliberately don't send the login or password key phrases to chat, as
I am following the instructions that my ISP (IBM Global Network)  set
(if I do so then I receive a message from
chat that my
 script has failed)

my host.conf file looks like this
order hosts,bind
multi on

my resolv.conf file looks like this
domain ibm.net
nameserver 152.158.2.48
nameserver 165.87.201.244

my options file looks like this (* used; but really contains my account
name)
115200
name Internet..
noauth
defaultroute
noipdefault

my pap-secrets file looks like this  (* used; but really contains my
account name and password)
# Secrets for authentication using PAP
# client server secret   IP addresses
"Internet.." * ""


the /var/log/messages  file looks like this
   (by issuing the command tail -f /var/log/messages)

Jan 22 19:17:23 localhost kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
unregistered
Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of
the University of California
Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: registered device ppp0
Jan 22 19:24:37 localhost pppd[369]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
Jan 22 

Linux-Networking Digest #45

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #45, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 15:13:52 EST

Contents:
  Re: AOL with IP masq (Lonny Schwartz)
  Re: problem with ppp not connecting (Clifford Kite)
  Re: ppp interface not being deleted! (Clifford Kite)
  Re: PAP problem Please Help!! (Clifford Kite)
  Re: knfsd stable (compared to nfs-server-2.2beta40) ? (Duncan Simpson)
  ppp hangs too soon (Francesc Guasch)
  Re: How do I get my IP addresses in multiple NIC conf. (Vladimir Peric)
  Re: 3c905tx 10/100 Redhat 5.2 ("Terry Fielder")
  Re: Pipeline 75/NAT/dynamic ip (jmcknight)
  Kernel via tftp (Dan Ellis)
  Re: Linux better than NT 4.0 for file and print? (Jeff Fox)
  Re: connecting to Netware ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: problem with ppp not connecting (Clifford Kite)
  how do you out dial on a modem from the server prompt (Daddy Rabbit)
  Http loadbalancing for linux ("Jeff Ellis")
  Re: Samba and file permissions... (Steeve)
  Printing problem ! ("greg")
  Re: TCP/IP connectivity for NT and Linux ("phantom")
  Re: realaudio heavy CPU loading (Eric Potter)
  Problem with rsh not running login scripts (Ken Corbin)
  Re: Track down ping problems with 2 linux machine network. (James Youngman)
  Re: Masquerading and battle.net/Diablo (Don O'Connell)
  Re: help with script to temporarily reconfig net (jamie)
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: rpc errors and kernel 2.2.1 (Darrell Tangman)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lonny Schwartz)
Subject: Re: AOL with IP masq
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:03:35 GMT

I've run AOL with IPMasq on my linux box with no problems.  Just set
AOL to use TCP/IP and your all set.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:26:14 -0500, Josh Rusko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

I will soon be setting up a network at work, and everyone will be
sharing an internet connection, most likely either ISDN or cable with a
Linux box masquerading for a gateway. Some people there use (ughh...)
AOL in addition to your standard netscape and M$ Outlook and whatnot.
Are there any special masquerading rules I must set to allow AOL to
connect through masquerade? I ask this because at home I have 2
computers sharing a connection through a windoze PC running wingate, and
AOL didn't work until I got a licensed version. The unlicensed version
allows the computer it's running on, along with one other computer to
share a connection. I'm assuming that AOL opens a socket on the client
computer, making wingate think there's 3 computers sharing and it won't
let it through. If so, I thought maybe I'd need some weird settings for
masquerading too. If anyone has set up AOL behind an IP masquerade,
please let me know if you had to do anything special.
thank you



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: problem with ppp not connecting
Date: 29 Jan 1999 09:30:31 -0600

William Parr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm having trouble trying to connect to my ISP using the PPP protocol
: using RedHat v5.1

: I'm trying to connect with the following script
: #!/bin/sh
: pppd debug /dev/cua0 connect 'chat -t 20 -v "" atdt0570889001 "CONNECT"'

..

: my options file looks like this (* used; but really contains my account
: name)
: 115200
: name Internet..
: noauth
: defaultroute
: noipdefault

: my pap-secrets file looks like this  (* used; but really contains my
: account name and password)
: # Secrets for authentication using PAP
: # client server secret   IP addresses
: "Internet.." * ""


: the /var/log/messages  file looks like this

: Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
: allocation)
: Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
: Jan 22 19:24:36 localhost kernel: registered device ppp0
: Jan 22 19:24:37 localhost pppd[369]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
: Jan 22 19:24:38 localhost chat[370]: send (atdt0570889001^M)
: Jan 22 19:24:38 localhost chat[370]: expect (CONNECT)
: Jan 22 19:24:56 localhost chat[370]: atdt0570889001^M^M
: Jan 22 19:24:56 localhost pppd[369]: Serial connection established.
: Jan 22 19:24:56 localhost chat[370]: CONNECT
: Jan 22 19:24:56 localhost chat[370]:  -- got it
: Jan 22 19:24:57 localhost pppd[369]: Using interface ppp0
: Jan 22 19:24:57 localhost pppd[369]: Connect: ppp0 -- /dev/cua0
: Jan 22 19:25:04 localhost pppd[369]: Hangup (SIGHUP)



Look in /var/log/debug for the ppp negotiation messages for more
information.  Put

*.=debug/var/log/debug

in /etc/syslog.conf if this file doesn't exist.  "man syslog.conf" explains.

It might be that because of the "."'s you need quotes with the
pppd option name, i.e.,

name "Internet.." * ""

but at this point it could be a lot of other things.


--
Clifford Kite [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Linux-Networking Digest #46

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #46, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 16:13:32 EST

Contents:
  Re: DHCP? (mike burrell)
  modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy (Sven ISDN)
  Re: swapon -s returning error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Raw IPX (FtnPatrick)
  Re: PCI Network card problem (Jim Roberts)
  Re: ethernet card setup problems (Marc Jauvin)
  Squid 2.12PATCH2  ACL Proxy_Auth (Tobias Pirk)
  NT dialing into Linux PPP server negotiation problems (David Hoelzer)
  Bratislava - looking for C++ programmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Netatalk 1.42b (Cameron Moller)
  netware dislikes linux ? (Christophe Zwecker)
  Re: 2.2.0 killed smb??? (Frank Sweetser)
  Control/Monitoring of PPP link via WEB ("Joe")
  need help!!! ("BBQ")
  Re: Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK (Greg Menke)
  Re: Raw IPX (FtnPatrick)



From: mike burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:57:36 GMT

Ya Wen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

| Hi, there:

| I am a newbie of Linux but pretty good at Solaris though. Here is my
| question. Is there a way that I can configure to make my Red Hat Linux
| 5.0 to get dynamic IP address as well as other networking info. from a
| Windows NT DHCP server? If so, what should I configure? If you could also
| point me to a web site, that will be very helpful!

look around on sunsite (ftp://metalab.unc.ed/pub/Linux) for a package called
dhcpcd.  it worked for me! :)

-- 
   m i k eb u r r e l l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://mikpos.dyndns.org

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sven ISDN)
Subject: modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:36 +0100

Hi,

I've got a problem with my Intel EthernetExpress Pro 10 Mbit card. If I try
to install the device using modprobe e.g.

modprobe eepro io=0x300 irq=10 mem=dx000

I get the message

/lib/modules/2.0.32/net/eepro.o: init_module: Device or recource busy

Am I doing something wrong? Fact is, that this problems keeps me as busy as
the device or resource pretends to be!

Would you help me?



--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: swapon -s returning error
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:17:53 GMT

Mike,

Yes, swapon has been run.  I've flagged the partition as swap, I've added the
proper entry to fstab, i've run mkswap, I've run swapon.  I've done this
before several times with no trouble.  Here is fstab:

/dev/hda3   /ext2defaults   1   1
/dev/hda1   swapswap   0   0
#/dev/hda2  swapswap
none /procprocdefaults   1   1

I have hda2 commented out so that I can try to get hda1 working properly
first.  Everything looks ok to me, other than an oops due to "unable to
handle paging request."  I'm sure this is because the paging space isn't
being used.  Here's free:

twistdrill:~# free
 total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 47152  40568   6584   5656  14148  21344
-/+ buffers/cache:   5076  42076
Swap:52380  0  52380

This tells me that everything should work, but the swap space is being added
with a -1 priority.  I'm curious, does it matter if the partition which holds
my / filesystem isn't in the first part of my disk?  Here's my partition
table:

Disk /dev/hda: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 1023 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes

   Device Boot   BeginStart  End   Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda111   2652384+  82  Linux swap
/dev/hda2   27   27   5252416   82  Linux swap
/dev/hda3   53   53 1023  1957536   83  Linux native


I appreciate your response, and will appreciate even more help.

Brad Beck
Network Admin
bjb@don'[EMAIL PROTECTED]









From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Kelly)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: swapon -s returning error
Date sent:  Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:13:50 -0500
Organization:   ...

 On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:53:01 GMT, in comp.os.linux.networking you wrote:

 I am having trouble getting my swap spaces to work.  My fstab file is ok, I
 have created the partitions, etc.  When I run swapon -a with no options, the
 space is added with a priority of -1.  This seems strange to me.

 Did you ever run mkswap on the partitions?


 Mike

 "Genius gives birth, talent delivers."

 - Jack Kerouac

 (remove NOSPAM from address, if present, to reply)


= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network 
http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

--

From: [EMAIL 

Linux-Networking Digest #47

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #47, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 19:13:56 EST

Contents:
  Using Linux as gateway for Win9x network (NEWBIE) (Matt Smith)
  Re: Http loadbalancing for linux (Matt Kressel)
  URGENT: Security problem ("Corey Ralph")
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist ("Paul R. Stoetzer")
  PPP 2.3.5: Connect to ISP ok, but cannot ping gateway: bad packets (Stefan Huebner)
  Re: Best (?) Network cards (Bob)
  Re: Telnet Puzzle (Barry Margolin)
  Re: Telnet Puzzle (Marco Leeflang)
  Sendmail bounces mail please help. ("John N. Alegre")
  Re: Another Newbie PPP question ("Faust")
  Re: lessons learned while setting up masquerading (Frank Sweetser)
  Re: Kernel via tftp (Frank Sweetser)
  Netatalk printer goes offline (Brian C. Burke)
  Request ipfwadm advice ("Mike Samsel")
  Re: configuration of eth0  ifconfig (Jim Richardson)
  Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 ("Thomas Chai")
  Re: Does TIP dialer still exist anywhere? (David Magda)
  Re: URGENT: Security problem (Stuart R. Fuller)



From: Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using Linux as gateway for Win9x network (NEWBIE)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:18:45 -0500

Hi all,

Here's a potentially stupid question for everyone that has a Linux box
as a gateway... do you leave it on all the time? Is there a Advanced
Power Management System equivalent for Linux?

I'm thinking of configuring a Linux box to act as a gateway and
firewall, but I don't like the idea of having to boot a second machine
up everytime I want to get on the net. Does that make sense?

Thanks,

Matt


--

From: Matt Kressel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Http loadbalancing for linux
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:10:51 GMT

Jeff Ellis wrote:
 
 I need to know the name of a Linux package that can load balance web
 servers. We are looking to use squid as a httpd accelerator and have four or
 five squid machines caching our web server. We do not want to just use DNS
 to round robin between them.
 
 Thanks for the help!


I think the 2.2.x kernels have support for bandwidth control on an
interface.  Using this you could specify a maximum bandwidth for an
interface.   If your route was set up correctly it would ditstribute
load between the four squids evenly, with a maximum load on each.  For
the details, grab the kernel source and read the docs.

-Matt

-- 
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+-  Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY -+
+-  TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 +

--

From: "Corey Ralph" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: URGENT: Security problem
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:36:45 +1100

I have a problem with a proxy server being syn flooded.  From what I have
read, this hole has been fixed in all recent kernels.

The really strange thing is that I have SCSI errors coming up at the same
time as these syn-cookies messages come up.  I think this is probably more
than coincidence.  The disk doesn't even boot now.

If anyone has any ideas or suggestions please reply to me via email.

Regards,

Corey Ralph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--

From: "Paul R. Stoetzer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 16:18:04 -0500

I have used Caldera OpenLinux Lite 1.1 and Red Hat 5.1, I cannot get
connected to my ISP on either, but on Caldera I couldn't get sound or my
joystick(for fly8) working. I can on Red Hat though. I am ordering Debian,
Slackware, and TurboLinux from CheapBytes though and plan to try them all.

Paul R. Stoetzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 78q391$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Being a pre-newbie, looking to get involved with Linus.  Which flavor would
be the best to get involved with.

Current skillset M$ NT/98/95 using a NT4 network, DHCP, TCP/IP.


Need to make a stable internal email server of which the 25 windows 95/98
outlook97 client users can access internal email as well as external 'isp'
email.

Right now I am using a Windows 95 machine
internal email : microsoft mail (25 users)
external email access: 602 internet server
(unstable and has to reboot frequentlyas usual with MS)


Was thinking Caldera or Redhatnot sure though.

Thank you for your time
Jason

please email me at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





--

From: Stefan Huebner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP 2.3.5: Connect to ISP ok, but cannot ping gateway: bad packets
Date: 29 Jan 1999 16:20:10 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello !

I have a problem getting pppd-2.3.5 to work. This prevents me from using
newer kernels, 

I can connect to my ISP without problems, but afterwards I'm not able to
ping the remote gateway. However I can see Transmit- and Receive-Lights of
my Zyxel-ISDN-Modem flicker when doing a ping. The 

Linux-Networking Digest #49

1999-01-29 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #49, Volume #10  Fri, 29 Jan 99 23:13:52 EST

Contents:
  Win95 Internet Connection --- Linux Box ("Jeff Appler")
  Re: sun -- linux box ("Christopher G. Petty")
  Windows login to corporate domain thru Linux server ("Christopher G. Petty")
  Help, ISP setup! (William Gross)
  Re: configuration of eth0  ifconfig (Man-wai Chang)
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (Eoin)
  Re: Request ipfwadm advice ("Mike Westman")
  Re: Winchat protocol for linux... ("Christopher G. Petty")
  Help, ISP setup! (William Gross)
  linux help channel (lattin96)
  Re: named: No response from Server (Wowix)
  UUCP over TCP logins (Jim Seymour)
  Re: PPP dial-up connection with RH5.2 (Mark Murray)
  Re: PPP Setup for Uswest.net Dial in (J. Scott Berg)
  X.25 point-to-multipoint routing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Nt  linux (David Magda)
  Re: Load Balancing (Gyepi Sam)
  bytes sent/recvd by network interface (Paul LeMahieu)



From: "Jeff Appler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Win95 Internet Connection --- Linux Box
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:39:33 GMT


How would one go about sharing a connection from a win95 box to a linux
box...

Thanks,

Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--

From: "Christopher G. Petty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sun -- linux box
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:41:19 -0500

 BUT if you still want connection to the other machines, neither this cable
 nor a hub will help you , without much further ado. this depends on the setup
 of the rest of your network, better ask the network-operators or admins or
 whatever how to do it best.

 ---== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==--
 http://www.dejanews.com/   Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Here I DISagree.

Plugging both machines in to a hub (or preferably a switch. Netgear makes a nice,
inexpensive 4 port switch that would do the trick here) and then from the hub
(switch) to a single wall port will allow both machines to talk to each other
without tasking the rest of the network. Granted the hub will still broadcast to the
rest of the net, and the switch won't once it finds the other machine (ergo that
suggestion). The other great benifit here would be that your sun and alpha boxes
could communicate with each other at 100Mb/s, while talking to the rest of the LAN
at 10Mb/s.

_CGP


--

From: "Christopher G. Petty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows login to corporate domain thru Linux server
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:49:33 -0500

Here's one for the thinkers out there. I'll admit I'm stumped on this
one.

I'm trying to allow remote windows users to login to my local LAN vial a
DoD Linux box. The problem is that the domain information refuses to
pass thru the PPP link. Services such as Micro$loth Exchange, Mail, etc
are not seen, nor are the machines on the other side of the PPP link.

I can ping both ways across the PPP link, so routing is not the issue.
The Linux server at the remote site is dialing into an NT 4 SP4 server.
When the link is up, I can ping the remote workstations, the remote
linux box, telnet to the remote linux box, and thru it, ping both remote
and local machines, but none of the NT domain information is being
passed.

Anyone got a clue on how I can get this to work?

Thanks in advance.

_CGP


--

From: William Gross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: 
comp.protocols.ppp,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Help, ISP setup!
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 22:25:54 -0600

Hello,

I need some help, please.  I am running RedHat 5.2 on a a clone pc,
and I am trying to connect to my ISP which is called Integrity Online.
The problem is that they have a firewall, and I have never set Linux up
to deal with a firewall before.  I can successfully connect to my ISP,
it assigns me a dynamic ip address, as usual.  The problem is I cannot
get out to the internet.  Netscape tells me something like it cannot
find the proxy server that I have set up in it even though I know that
the proxy name is correct, it is the same info I use in NT 4.0 and Win95
and they connect and cruise fine.  I have pinged the firewall from my NT
and Win95 connections and have put the corresponding ip number in my
hosts file in order for their to be a dns resolution on my end.  If I
did not, Netscape complains that "proxy.iolusa.com is unknown" and will
not let me continue to configure it.  If I try to ping the firewall or
any valid internet address from my Linux connection, I get the error
from ping that the network is unreachable.  The protocol that I am using
is tcp-ip, of course.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.  I have
banged my head against this for awhile and have not gotten anywhere.
Thanks in advance.

  Leroy



Linux-Networking Digest #51

1999-01-30 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #51, Volume #10  Sat, 30 Jan 99 02:14:03 EST

Contents:
  Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10 (Bill Unruh)
  Re: help with script to temporarily reconfig net (Arthur Corliss)
  How to enable IP forwarding on SuSE Linux 6.0 ("Volker Kalthaus")
  Re: I know it's been asked a million times... (Scott Alfter)
  Linux and ADSL are biting me! (Joe Nardone)
  Slow PPP link ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
  mgetty (Josh Gentry)
  Re: dialing out while mgetty is at work (Josh Gentry)
  Re: identifying a NIC ("GV Morgon")
  Samba shares and different Workgroups (Mehrdad Ravanbod)
  Newbie:LAN setup advice needed ("Christopher J. Mark")
  Re: POP3 ("Jonas")
  Re: Can I "tune" my PPP connection to reduce disconnects? (Chris Plachta)
  Re: networking with MS-Windows and MS-DOS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Newbie Q: Linux Box as Router, Server, Gateway? (Cyrus Mehta)
  Re: UUCP over TCP logins ("Michael Faurot")
  Re: Problem in using uugetty/PPP server ("Simon Annetts")
  Re: DHCP Server setup - Complete rookie need help please ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts??? (John Thompson)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: LINUX PPP on a SPARC10
Date: 29 Jan 1999 08:10:54 GMT

In 78qsci$k8u$[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moe) writes:

I'm trying to connect via PPP to the University of Wisc PPP server. The modem 
connects and then I see garbage chars (in /var/log/messages that is).

What would I see if they're assuming I'm going to start using PPP right away? 
And how do I login? 

You would see exactly that. The user authorisation will then be done via
PAP (probably) or CHAP. Your username and password then go inot the 
/etc/ppp/pap-secrets or /etc/ppp/chap-secrets file.
So, have the chat script finish after it sees the CONNECT message, and
let pppd take over. Look in /var/log/messages for a 
auth pap or auth chap in one of the lines. That will tell you
which.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Corliss)
Subject: Re: help with script to temporarily reconfig net
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 28 Jan 1999 22:31:16 -0900

On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:59:07 -0600, jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Slackware 3.6, kernel 2.0.36, no Xconfiguration utils like redhat)

Normally, I have eth0 connected to cable modem, and eth1 to my home net.
eth0 uses 10baseT connector and eth1 uses BNC connector.  I'm leisurely
setting up a new linux box to replace my current linux box, and the
ethernet card it came with has only a 10baseT connector.

I need to write a script to temporarily unconfigure both eth0 and eth1,
so that I can temporarily configure eth0 to the home lan to transfer
lots of files.  I know how to undo routing and ipfwadm, but I'm somewhat
unclear on how to undo ifconfig commands.

Does "ifconfig eth0 down" undo the other ifconfig commands as well
bringing it down?  or do I have to undo each ifconfig command
separately?

Why switch what device eth0 and eth1 is attached to?  Perhaps I'm missing
something, but it would seem that if you're just insisting on using certain
addresses for certain traffic you could use ifconfig and the route command to
swap the addresses.

--Arthur Corliss
  Bolverk's Lair -- http://www.odinicfoundation.org/arthur/
  "Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto

--

From: "Volker Kalthaus" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to enable IP forwarding on SuSE Linux 6.0
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:44:58 +0100

Hello all,

i have a SuSE Linux 6.0 box "running" as a router.
2 Nics are installed. Every NIC on a different subnet.

Here´s my problem:

i can ping every NICs IP Adress from both subnets. But i CANT ping
Clients residing in the different subnet. It seems that there is no IP
forwarding enabled. I checked the Kernel with make menuconfig, but it tells
me that ip forwarding has been enabled and installed.

can any1 help ?

Volker Kalthaus
([EMAIL PROTECTED])





--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Alfter)
Subject: Re: I know it's been asked a million times...
Date: 29 Jan 1999 00:12:35 -0800

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jay Copeland  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have two linux boxes in our house

I have been trying for about a week to get IP Masquing (sp?) to work

aaa.bbb.ccc.32 voyager.qx.net voyager
aaa.bbb.ccc.33 defiant.qx.net defiant

Try setting up your machines on a private network (192.168.[1-254].x). 
IIRC, you need to do this with IP masquerading (the whole point is to hide
an entire network behind a single IP address).

  _/_
 / v \
(IIGS(  Scott Alfter (salfter at (yo no quiero spam) delphi dot com)
 \_^_/  

Linux-Networking Digest #52

1999-01-30 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #52, Volume #10  Sat, 30 Jan 99 04:13:56 EST

Contents:
  Re: dialing out while mgetty is at work (M. Buchenrieder)
  Re: Linux and ADSL are biting me! (Miguel Cruz)
  Newbe's cry for help w/ LAN (FyreFiend)
  PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? ("Bert Bulder")
  Best (?) Network cards (Robert J Carter)
  multiple dialup on linux (Louis the Goober)
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? (Mark Styles)
  Re: Why does Netscape hang until I dial up? (Mark Grosberg)
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? ("Bert Bulder")
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? (Mark Styles)
  PPP server accounting (Robert Pouliot)
  Re: Multidrop Mail Software (Dale Pontius)
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? ("Bert Bulder")
  Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (teri)
  Cron Job problems ("Rick Glunt")
  Changing colordepth ("Bert Bulder")
  Re: GTE, DSL and Linux (Bob)
  Samba  NT WS sharing problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (Jose Santiago)
  lfe-8139tx network card (Rick Bauman)
  Re: ppp help (Minh Giang)
  Re: ISA RealTek 8019 (root)
  Re: DHCP acting funny? (Bob)



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: dialing out while mgetty is at work
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 07:54:03 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Gentry) writes:

Folks,

I have noticed that when I try to dial out with a modem that is being
monitored by mgetty I am told the
device is busy.  Is  there a way to dial out without turning off mgetty?

Sure. Just read the mgetty.info files, especially the parts about
_all programs using the same device name (ttyS*) solely_ .

Michael

-- 
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
  Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC)  Official Netscum
   Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.xdsl
Subject: Re: Linux and ADSL are biting me!
Date: 30 Jan 1999 06:53:21 GMT

(posted and mailed)

Joe Nardone  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Now, drop out the W95 box for the Linux box.  Go to set up the
 routing, and here's where it looks like Bell is lying to me:

  IP: 151.200.17.173  (fine)
  Gateway:  151.200.16.1  (hmm.. same subnet still?)
  Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0  (what??? how can this be?)

I just did this today. You need to set up a static route to the gateway.
Here's the sum total of all the changes I made to my system in order to get
it working (commented for your pleasure, and changed to your numbers):

in /etc/rc.d/init.d/init:

# first, load the driver for the card they mailed me
/sbin/insmod /lib/modules/2.0.36-0.7/net/3c59x.o

# then, up the interface
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 151.200.17.173 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 
151.200.17.255

# set up the static route to the gateway
/sbin/route add -host 151.200.16.1 eth0

# and set up the default route
/sbin/route add -net 0.0.0.0 gw 151.200.16.1 

miguel

--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FyreFiend)
Subject: Newbe's cry for help w/ LAN
Date: 30 Jan 1999 00:59:04 -0600

Hello,
I am new to Linux so please be kind.

I am trying to set up a LAN with 1 Mac and 1 linux RH5.2 box using TCP via
a twisted pair cross-over cable. I have the Mac set to Ethernet, IP
192.168.0.2, Netmask 255.255.255.0. On the Linux side I have eth0 using IP
192.168.0.3, netmask 255.255.255.0. 
The problem is the machines won't talk to each other. I *think* the
network card on the Linux box is working because at boot It shows the
memory addresses for it and ifconfig is giving me a MAC address but I
can't ping the Mac and the Mac can't telnet or finger (I don't have a ping
tool for the Mac). After trying ping a few times ifconfig says that zero
packets have gone through eth0. Also I have netatalk installed and at boot
when it starts atalkd it pauses for about a minute before continuing the
boot proccess. And I'm not seeing anything in chooser (I don't know if
they're related).
I know the network card works because windows sees the card and I know the
cable is good because I can transfer files between windows and the mac
using PC MacLan.
I've downloaded the NET3-HOWTO and I *think* I did everything right.

Any help would be great! E-mail at (fyrefiend at hotmail dot com) would
work best but posts are more then welcome.

Thank you in advance,
Lloyd

--

From: "Bert Bulder" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:47:45 +0100

I'm new to Linux, and have become ultimately frustrated over the last 5 days
in my attempts to set up a PPP connection.

How hard can it get to set up a PPP dial-up connection with RedHat Linux
5.2?
If you read the manual, the FAQ's, the HOW TO's and RedHat's kind 

Linux-Networking Digest #53

1999-01-30 Thread Digestifier

Linux-Networking Digest #53, Volume #10  Sat, 30 Jan 99 07:13:35 EST

Contents:
  Re: modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy (Bob)
  Re: Cron Job problems (Mark Styles)
  reverse lookup problem (Francesc Guasch)
  Re: how do you out dial on a modem from the server prompt ("phantom")
  Re: DHCP Client @ Comcast@Home (Bob)
  Re: Newbie Q: Linux Box as Router, Server, Gateway?
  Sendmail Error Message ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Redhat 5.2 PPP-server  win95 ("Charles Stack")
  Re: where can i download 'isode-8.0' (Mark Purcell)
  trouble compiling Net-tools 1.49 ("Roadrunner")
  Microdyne NE10/100 - can't find a driver that works (Brad Mettee)
  Re: PPP dial-up connection with RH5.2 ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? (Ian Smith)
  ftp and telnet slow (Engelbrecht Gunther)
  Re: Changing colordepth (mike burrell)
  Re: problem with ppp not connecting (William Parr)
  Re: realaudio heavy CPU loading (Dave)
  tokenring dhcpcd ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: infrared (root)



From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: modprobe eepro: Device or resource busy
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:03:25 -0500

Sven ISDN wrote:

 Hi,

 I've got a problem with my Intel EthernetExpress Pro 10 Mbit card. If I try
 to install the device using modprobe e.g.

 modprobe eepro io=0x300 irq=10 mem=dx000

 I get the message

 /lib/modules/2.0.32/net/eepro.o: init_module: Device or recource busy

Have you tried not giving any options except debug=5?

-Bob


--

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Styles)
Subject: Re: Cron Job problems
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:13:00 GMT

"Rick Glunt" [EMAIL PROTECTED] rambled:
I have several scripts I use to connect to my ISP.  When I run them from the
terminal they work fine.  When I put the script into crom to run every 1/2
hour, I get an error "PPP link is not active on ppp0".  What is the
difference where I run the script if I know it works?

I expect it is an environment problem. Remember that when you run
things from cron, your login scripts do not get executed, so the full
environment is not created.

Try changing the cron entry from (for example):

30 * * * * /usr/blah/ppp-on

to:

30 * * * * . $HOME/.profile; /usr/blah/ppp-on

Mark Styles
Spam my account, lose your account. Clear enough?
http://www.lambic.co.uk

--

From: Francesc Guasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: reverse lookup problem
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:42:32 +0100

Hi. I have the typical reverse lookup problem.
My server tries to resolve names that has in /etc/hosts.
I have searched dejanews and followed some advises found
here but I still haven't succedded.
- I added entries for /etc/hosts
- I modifield the  file /etc/nsswitch.conf
It was like this :
networks: files dns
hosts: files dns
I tried only 
files
I tried 
files [NOTFOUND=return] dns
- I removed /etc/nsswitch.conf
- I added in /etc/hosts:
order hosts, bind
multi on

What else can I do ?


-- 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.etsetb.upc.es/~frankie
 ^-^.-, 
 o o _ ) Errors, like straws, upon the surface flow;
  Y (_, (__(Ssss He who would search for pearls must dive below.

--

From: "phantom" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how do you out dial on a modem from the server prompt
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:19:03 -

have you tried using minicom?




--

From: Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP Client @ Comcast@Home
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 09:44:57 -0500

To get dhcpc working with the Intel card, which is mentioned in docs
and newsgroup as being difficult here, I simply downloaded dhcpcd
1.3.17-pl2 from sunsite. I solves a problem with 2.2.0 kernel and
another problem with that intel card.

I had another problem with letting the script start dhcpcd using
start-stop-daemon. Any options for dhcpcd would cause an
error message. I commented all those lines and just ran the
thing,

/sbin/dhcpcd -h username eth0

-Bob

Ken wrote:

 Hi all,

 I am working on getting my Linux router/firewall working with my cable
 modem. The internal part of the network seems fine... I can telnet,
 ping, FTP, etc between the Linux box and my Windows machines.

 I am trying to get the DHCP client to work on the external connection.
 After some digging into the network-scripts I have determined that I am
 indeed running dhcpcd (0.70) WITH the -h option. Unfortunately, I do
 not seem to be connecting.

 I have seen that in my normal set-up (Win 95 DHCP client to cable
 modem), I see that I send a DHCP REQUEST (Type 3) message and I get back
 a DHCP ACK (Type 5). All works fine.

 With my Linux client, I send a DISCOVER (Type 1) message and get an
 OFFER in reply. The reply message has an IP address (the one I normally
 get), DNS server 

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >