great tip, I never realized that!
thanks
Dennis Saputelli
Hamid A. Wasti wrote:
It is a bad idea to use an inside radius same as your router bit radius. This
requires the router to come to a complete stop and then start moving at 90
degrees. There will invariably be some chatter
sorry, it's my lame term for the 'update free primitives from component
pads' function in the netlist manager menu option
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Dennis,
can you be more specific in your learning the board? I think I
know what you mean but I am not exactly sure
mil outside routing tolerance, but they
responded that they were ISO-9000 and needed a written sign-off for the
'deviation'
Unfortunately, I fear this is where we are headed, more nonsense and
less service.
Dennis Saputelli
Micky Blain wrote:
Sorry for the reply, I need to show more self
.
Dennis Saputelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I place a track (maybe 20 mil) on each power plane around the edge of the
outline
of the board to prevent the power planes from extending too far.
___
Clive Broome
IDT Sydney Design
-load
the netlist without problems since learning the board can introduce
unintended issues
Dennis Saputelli
Bryan Bernesi wrote:
Hello,
I don't know what I did, but after I transfered my netlist from SCH to
PCB (following your clear instructions in the previous email), the
Online DRC
did you empty the recycle bin before compress?
BTW, I finally turned off compress on exit, too slow to tolerate.
Dennis Saputelli
Mark HARRISON wrote:
Hi,
I noticed a Protel 99SE SP6 .ddb project had grown to 24 Mbytes and took a
long time to open.
No amount of clearing out the garbage
.
not perfect, but it has sped me up without problems (yet)
Dennis Saputelli
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:48 PM 2/27/01 -0700, Colby - PowerStream wrote:
ERC is a subject I will leave open for anyone that uses it, I do not.
So it sounds like the first problem to tackle is to make sure
I think we heard this about SP6
does the .DRR file look correct?
I think maybe it's just the gerber plots
Dennis Saputelli
Brooks,Bill wrote:
I just installed the SP6 on our Protel 99SE software a week ago... We use
the size of hole string as the code for the hole location on our drill
the particulars of
the technique, I'm sure it could be improved or made more like other
apps
Dennis Saputelli
David W. Gulley wrote:
Geoff Harland wrote:
snip
- (Pcb Server): Add support for *resizing* of a currently-focused fill
primitive using the *mouse*. That is, if you click
acrobat 4 will also allow you to gather individual schem pdfs into a
multi sheet pdf document.
Dennis Saputelli
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
With what I know now about PDF, I'd definitely buy whatever it took to get
the ability to write it, and I might buy Acrobat anyway, because of all
I got into an argument once with a German fellow in which I claimed
inches were 'better'
I challenged him to a contest in which we drew various closely spaced
lines on a pc of paper and then eyeballed the spacing
I lost
then I found out he was a dentist!
Dennis Saputelli
Georg Beckmann wrote
)
Dennis Saputelli
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Hello, all:
I have purchased the upgrade to Protel 99SE. It has been sitting in the box
for about 3 months now, waiting for my new computer hardware to arrive. The
old computer (circa 1996 Dell) can't run 99SE. Not enough RAM (64MB, can't
add
I believe that in SP6 they f'd up the legend and that it is wrong.
The drill report file is correct.
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Luo,
one of my first thoughts points me toward something that has bitten
me recently. Do you by chance have any pads that are one layer (top
into it.
seems like I remember that they enforce caps on pad names, or at least
they used to.
Dennis Saputelli
--
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
tel: 415-647-0480
ultimately assumes the form of a Bill of
Materials and Assembly Instructions and only us geeks can even
peripherally understand the original schematic anyway.
Of course forge ahead with whatever works for you this is just my 3
cents ...
Dennis Saputelli
van de Werken, Matthew (DEM, PH) wrote
layer and
then PURGE
this way when you pop it into another .dwg it doesn't spew layers into
that dwg
Dennis Saputelli
Ian Wilson wrote:
On 12:10 PM 2/04/2001 -0400, Andy Lintz said:
I use Autocad for assembly drawings, and I also was plagued by huge files
and long redraw times until I learned
i have created negative text this way, I put a sample on egroups some
time ago
bit of a pain though, don't think it's really nec
Dennis Saputelli
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 01:43 PM 3/27/01 -0500, Thomas Sprunger wrote:
I am trying to find a way to place text and components on ground
I think it is maybe gone
fraught with pitfalls anyway if you move the board around on the
workspace, I remember getting burned on that once
Dennis Saputelli
Linden Doyle wrote:
Greetings all,
Has anyone had reason to use the REGION scope mentioned in the Design Rule
section
I don't know about NT or 2000 but it WIN98 you can rebuild icons by
simply going to desktop appearance and tweak or pretend to tweak the
icon size
my icons go bad all the time, don't know why
it's not particularly protel
Dennis Saputelli
Frank Gilley wrote:
Phil,
Memory corruption of icons
what is the distance from the silkscreen line to the pad?
silkscreen tolerance is not real tight
Dennis Saputelli
Steve Wiseman wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, John Haddy wrote:
I need hand placement for prototypes and a sea of pads without bounding
boxes to guide a human is just asking
but what about electro plated full body gold over nickel, isn't that ok?
I have heard of (actually read about) BGAs having cracked joints due to
shock when boards are immersion gold plated.
Dennis Saputelli
Mark E Witherite wrote:
Hi,
The Gold causes enbrittlement. NASA now
it doesn't do that
it will control progs which run at startup and let you remove the little
arrow on icons for shortcuts
and some other useless and useful stuff
I don't see the rearrangement you describe but my desktop and tray icons
all turn into random duplicate icons almost every day
Dennis
my god, i never saw the Layer Stackup Legend menu item on the Tools Menu
it would have saved hours of drawing all that junk
of course ours looked better than this but i think it looks like it will
be adequate
Dennis Saputelli
Rudolf Schaffer wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
I had the same problem
was this in the 'new features' list of some SP ?
if so, I sure missed it
Dennis Saputelli
Michael Reagan wrote:
my god, i never saw the Layer Stackup Legend menu item on the Tools Menu
it would have saved hours of drawing all that junk
of course ours looked better than this but i
hello
I am interested in the solidworks plugin for Protel
I just bought solidworks, but have not loaded it or learned it yet
what is the program that you offer called?
is there any sort of trial or satisfaction guarantee?
Dennis Saputelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for my tardy
sorry, i meant to send this off list
Dennis Saputelli wrote:
hello
I am interested in the solidworks plugin for Protel
I just bought solidworks, but have not loaded it or learned it yet
what is the program that you offer called?
is there any sort of trial or satisfaction guarantee
i think i remember running into this
as i recall I had to go back to 2.8 to fix it up for re-import
Dennis Saputelli
Linden Doyle wrote:
Greetings all,
How do I unlock component strings ?
I didn't even know they could be locked.
I am editing a legacy design using 99SE
this is why business guys still fly all over to meet face to face, it's
easier and better
Dennis Saputelli
--
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
tel: 415-647-0480
in your
pad designators and pop up Java apps that display the bottle labels on
your PCB workspace as you work. Now that would be real progress.
Dennis Saputelli
Phil So wrote:
Brad
Good point. How much control does Protel have over pcbmarketplace.com? If
it is as little as the control we
the pad is round in the inner layers
Dennis Saputelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm completing my first board, in 99SE SP5, with connections to internal
planes. I've noticed some questionable behavior and I'd like to confirm my
experience is normal.
1.) Protel does not create
?
it actually might, or maybe it might not, but someone or some entity has
to pay
as somebody once quipped the best number of standards is either one or
infinity
sorry to have rambled and good luck with your footprint
Dennis Saputelli
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Hello, all:
Does anyone
one last thought on this
it may not matter what footprint you use because when you really get
rolling and really need the chips they won't be available
it is Maxim you know :)
Dennis Saputelli
their game plan is to throw as many part types as they can against the
wall and see which ones stick
it works for them because the real money is in very high volume for
which there is usually enough planning and time
for the smaller guys ...
Dennis Saputelli
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote
this sounds ok and potentially worthwhile ($175/yr)
but what is the cost to get in initially?
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Ivan,
can you point me directly towards a detail for the package size? I
will then send you the footprint I would use from SMT+ 's footprint patterns
thanks Brad
so i take it you think it is worth it?
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Dennis,
the initial cost for the software based version is $595USD for a
three user license (they don't have a single user license). The book version
is now a single CDROM and it is priced
their parts are good
but I have not had your experience with availability
Dennis Saputelli
Madhu Annapragada wrote:
Just to jump in in defense of Maxim...I use a lot of their power supply and
communication related parts (MAX724, MAX1480, MAX1490, MAX488 etc...) and
they have been very good
SP6?
elec snap on?
sometimes I reckon the amounts first and point in space somewhere for
the ref point and make the move
you can also use a transparent Jump to location and type in the second
point
Dennis Saputelli
Kirk Haderlie wrote:
I am trying to move a set of components as a complex
path of the DDB
and if that changes it is not happy at all
I would suggest until they fix this stupid mess that instead of moving
or copying DDB's always create a fresh one in the desired location and
drag the files into that from the other one
Dennis Saputelli
in for the given operation
Does Protel have a comment on why there is not a File Save As for DDB's
?
I think this must relate.
Dennis Saputelli
Dennis,
Further to the above. I almost always use the Synch and so do others
working on the same DDBs. We routinely copy (MS-Access) DDBs about - from
yes I'm sure that was the problem on a few occasions
Dennis Saputelli
Harry Selfridge wrote:
It sounds like your wave soldering process is not set up correctly. The
boards should be evenly heated through before wave soldering, then cooled
uniformly.
What you describe happens when
nice paper, but it
seems like maybe it is a bad idea, too bad.
what do you think?
Dennis Saputelli
--
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
tel: 415-647-0480
and now, at least for the moment,
it seems to work
if this continues to work I think it will be adequate as it can easily
travel in the DDB
Dennis Saputelli
Dennis Saputelli wrote:
I had what I thought was a great idea, now not so sure...
I did a screen cap off a power ic data sheet pdf
wow, what ambition!
can you pls explain:
2 There is a conductive fence on the lowest layer as to avoid part placement
conflicts
a little more?
lowest layer = bottom layer?
and how does conductive help?
Dennis Saputelli
Ted Tontis wrote:
The standards are all ready set. I do not have
Dennis Saputelli
Steve Wiseman wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Ian Middleton wrote:
It could also ask about paste, solder, plating and tenting overrides as
well. It could also allow mixing on units when entering (mills and mm).
you can type xxxmm and yyymil - works nicely. The rest
get up, stretch and smell the flowers!
some busybody ergonomic lawmaker will probably legislate instability
someday
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Hi all,
this is just to find out if anybody else has experienced the
following aberrations. And do you have any way of recovering
, this is very
reliable in restoring the state of whatever went out of sync in the first place
Dennis Saputelli
--
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.comIntegrated Controls, Inc.
tel: 415-647-0480
how did you clean the registry and what OS are you using?
Dennis Saputelli
Dave Eloranta wrote:
Hi
I was without the hole size editor for several months, then I lost x-y
coordinate display for library editing only. The only solution for me was to
completely uninstall all things Protel
we use protel
use paste special on a copy of the board
set keep nets, dupe desigs
works pretty well
Dennis Saputelli
Tony Karavidas wrote:
Does anyone have a good procedure for PCB panelization? I've tried it in
Protel (99SE), and it wants to connect all the nets (which I understand).
When
i have no probs w/ win2K and HP LJ 4 plus
Dennis Saputelli
Andrew J Jenkins wrote:
On 10:28 PM 8/27/2001 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
Hi all,
I am running Protel 99SE with SP6 under WIN2K SP2.
when I try to print a PCB I get an access violation in module address 034de544
use the layer specific keepout tracks
they work
they look like tracks at first until you look at them closely
they don't plot with the real tracks
Dennis Saputelli
Evan Scarborough wrote:
Greetings all,
Is there a way to set up a design rule so that the defined keepout areas
only affect
is that nominally a right click type of thing?
if so and it is popping up on a left click
then you can clear it by holding the right shift key down and right clicking
somewhere in space
or maybe it's a left click, it hasn't happened lately
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Rob
will take an upfront committent of time to get going
Dennis Saputelli
Don Ingram wrote:
Hi All,
We are looking for a 3D cad pkg for generating components enclosures etc
for product design.
$7K is a bit steep for us for Autocad or Solidworks given the frequency of
use. ( at least for now ) Does
TWO sets of Gerbers with the both old name
and the new name!
47 files in all, all made in one pass, all in the same folder
more bush league behavoir IMHO
Dennis Saputelli
--
___
www.integratedcontrolsinc.com
thanks!
i never thought of that
in fact i never looked at the internal files at all, ever
yes was only looking at time stamps
i will check this out and report back
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Dennis,
I think that something is hooped in your Protel. I do the sort of
thing
or touching the window bounding box (aka crossing)
that wouldn't make life too much harder and would be very useful i think
we hosed a bd once which we probably wouldn't have if that crossing feature
was there
Dennis Saputelli
Bruce Walter wrote:
Sure, I can see the usefulness of this.
However
while says can't close 'end task?'
Dennis Saputelli
Ron Tupa wrote:
Just loaded Service Pack 6 for Protel 99SE under Windows 2000. When we
shut down, it hangs there for about a minute, then a message, Program
not responding , Program will be shut down and then shuts down.
Has anyone else
Brian could you elaborate a bit on this?
your comment means nothing to me
thanks
Dennis Saputelli
Brian Guralnick wrote:
It's called the SBLive drivers.
Brian Guralnick
- Original Message -
From: Colin Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL
of work, backup file empty, must have been just being
written
BTW, news.creativelabs.com does not appear to be a good URL
after all this i don't even know what Liveware is!
Dennis Saputelli
Brian Guralnick wrote:
Go to : http://www.microsoft.com/technet/mpsa/start.aspWin2K only!
and install
by
Cliff?
Dennis Saputelli
Mike Reagan wrote:
Well stated Cliff,
I am keeping your email for reference and testimony to expel the CAD demons.
I felt the same way about PADS but you stated it much better.
Mike Reagan
EDSI
Frederick MD
~~
Cliff Gerhard, P.E
dual foot print SO8 and DIP8
good for development and then production
Dennis Saputelli
Dan Beaudoin wrote:
Another way to deal with through holes for surface mount components is just
to place the through holes as free primatives and make the surface mount
pads the actual component pads
i have heard of this working, if i were doing it i think i would re-draw
the thing in protel on top of the imported gerber
don't forget you're going to need a good drill file too!
good luck and keep us posted
Dennis Saputelli
Robison Michael R CNIN wrote:
hello,
i guess our customer
BECAUSE INTERNATIONAL READERS WILL BE JUST AS DEAD AS THIS TERRORISM
SPREADS AROUND THE WORLD
Dennis Saputelli
Ian Wilson wrote:
I, for one, did not need to know about this stuff.
This is a Protel list and not a political forum. Why would international
readers wish to know about
commercial standards
protel probably knows pretty well what they are doing and they will
probably get away with it simply because everybody else will be doing it
too
the market will in the end determine whether this works, i.e. if there
is sufficient value to warrant the fees
Dennis Saputelli
to the board
shop
good luck
Dennis Saputelli
Robison Michael R CNIN wrote:
hello,
we're duplicating some legacy boards. in order to avoid flight testing i
hand-routed the traces to match the old artwork. i believe that i just
came close to making a SERIOUS mistake. i used the pcb wizard
technically and to be pedantic you should say Place Line (not track)
Dennis Saputelli
Ian Wilson wrote:
On 03:29 PM 8/11/2001 -0500, Robison Michael R CNIN said:
hello,
my questions:
1. the dark green i'm seeing represents the negative, or holes, in the
power plane, correct
i bet they pulled them back as SOP
Dennis Saputelli
Nicholas Cobb wrote:
Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that the power plane
clearance rule in the manufacturing section also included clearance from the
keepout layer around the edge of the board. So far, I have never
i usually place the first part and then fill out all the fields and then
use copy paste for the subsequent parts
Dennis Saputelli
Stephen Smith wrote:
When a multi-part component is placed on the schematic, and you need to
set, or change the footprint; why do you have to change it for each
you might be making trouble for yourself by not using the ddb
we have not (yet!) had a problem with it
it also spews enoughs backups onto the drive outside of the ddb that i
wouldn't worry too much about it
Dennis Saputelli
Steve Wiseman wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ian Wilson wrote:
I
every time i tried that there was something it did that i didn't want to
do
too bad it's almost useful
Dennis Saputelli
Colin Weber wrote:
Also, don't forget about Morphing (or Replication). Protel's best kept secret.
The Schematic editor allows objects being placed to copy all
don't forget to close protel first though
Dennis Saputelli
Colin Weber wrote:
Edit the c:\windows\Client99SE.INI file and delete them from [Closed Files
List] .
At 05:22 PM 14/11/2001 +, you wrote:
Also, is there a way to clear the recently opened files list from the
File Menu
Dwight wrote:
When we want a picture of a schematic that others can view, we print to a
pdf file using Acrobat Distiller. (Acrobat PDFWriter works similarly, but
Distiller seems to give slightly more accurate results.)
i too have found distiller slightly (noticeably) better
Dennis
what!
now that sounds really useful, never tried it
Dennis Saputelli
Brendon Slade wrote:
This can be used for nearly all objects, text, lines etc.
you can also drag a current object over another to get the
cloning to work.
I've also found you can clone between different object
re this particular 'feature'
'marketing fluff' is putting it kindly
Dennis Saputelli
Paul Hutchinson wrote:
In other words, if they lead someone to buy the program, Protel is going
to
have one angry user when he realizes he's been sold a pig in a poke. I
suppose they hope
my P99 is very stable
1.4G P4 1G ram W2k
no anti virus, no norton, lots of other programs
Dennis Saputelli
Tony Karavidas wrote:
Jason, you crack me up. First you complain about bugs in Protel, then you
say it's your IT guy's problem because he wants to patch the OS even when
my cpu vendor said i had latest w2k sp's (about 2-3 months ago)
but i still have 'lingering Client99.exes'
is there a way to tell my serv pack status in w2k ?
i don't want to go to MS and 'update' unless i have to
Dennis Saputelli
Brian Guralnick wrote:
You seem to be describing the SP1
is configured as 'dockable' then display, IDE
and SCSI adapters are ignored as elements of detecting hardware changes
if interested:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/evaluate/xpactiv.asp
Dennis Saputelli
Mark Richards wrote:
This thread is getting to be a bit off-topic
i think it is handy
doesn't a redraw fix that anyway? (i can't remember)
Wayne Trow wrote:
Hi All
When routing a trace on a signal layer when in single-layer-mode, parts of
the net that are on other layers show.
Is this meant to happen?
Can I stop it from happening?
IM USING SINGLE
i don't see the prob
just hit the END key and the other layer will disappear
that way you have it both ways
Dennis Saputelli
Wayne Trow wrote:
Its far from handy !!!
When in single layer mode I only want to see what is on that layer - I dont
care about the other layers at that moment. I
drill hits that are
not exactly at the same spot
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Ok, I know this is a no-brainer but this afternoon that suits me just fine,
I seem to be short some grey matter.
Where within Protel does it check for double drill hits?
I know that sometime in the past I
hey Mike i think we're not busy enough!
Dennis Saputelli
Mike Reagan wrote:
Where within Protel does it check for double drill hits?
I know that sometime in the past I have had this flagged when doing a
design
Brad,
Design Rules, Clearance rule, Add, oject kind , vias, set clearance
what is the point below which you cannot put solder mask between smd
pads
that is, what have you all found is too thin a sliver of mask to fab?
i'm thinking that 6-8 mils is about it and below that you have to mask
out the whole area
Dennis Saputelli
the holes must be of the same size to be reported in the DRR
i just checked it
it will report a via stacked on a pad if they are the same hole size
(as well as pad on pad and via on via if same hole size)
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Brendon,
I thought that Protel typically
are already clipped and there is no obvious flat spot
there is a leg inside with a bigger feature, but believe it or not that
cannot be relied upon either
Dennis Saputelli
Watnoski, Michael wrote:
Greetings,
I think part of the reason that LEDs are often mounted backwards is
that some types
don't think i like this idea
doesn't that make drill hits that are off the board too?
it make a bit of work too
i put NOT ON BD in footprint then it is clear when there is a netlist
load error
Dennis Saputelli
Marshall Edge wrote:
I create footprints for the off board components since
yes please believe it
Dennis Saputelli
Graeme Zimmer wrote:
sometimes assemblers look into the body to see the orientation if the
leads are already clipped and there is no obvious flat spot
And would you believe that there are LEDs with the insides reversed as well
] Translation Notice Error(s) encountered. Please check
the Session Log.
this appears to mean that it is looking for earlier orcad files which i
do not have
does this mean that protel cannot export back to a modern version of
orcad?
Dennis Saputelli
file in samples, but those libs cited will
surely not have all the symbols i have made in protel
Dennis Saputelli
Andrew W. Riley III wrote:
Hello,
Protel exports the older SDT version of OrCAD. More unfortunate is that Protel does
not export the parts you need. Therefore, Protel does
i wish Save All did not save all across all open DDBs, at least not
without an option
i wanted to save all in a current DDB, but it saved open sheets in
another DDB which had not changed
now they have a confusing file date as if something had been done to
them since over a year ago
Dennis
this work?
if 2 parts have different part types and the same group by field content
shouldn't that work?
i suppose i could put different strings in field 8 for different parts,
but i suppose i could manually annotate the thing too!
Dennis Saputelli
is that a protel setting or set it from the OS ?
Dennis Saputelli
Mark Koitmaa wrote:
Sounds like a reasonable request. In the meantime you might want to try
enabling the 'read only' file attribute for your archived DDB files. This
has the added benefit of faster shut down since read only
Popup 'Export'
Begin
MenuItem 'PCAD 2000 ASCII...'
SavePCADSCH:SavePCADLibFile
End
Dennis Saputelli
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 07:54 AM 12/12/01 +0100, Emanuel Zimmermann wrote:
- Open the schematic
- Under File-Menu choose Export
why not just make a bd with just those holes and give them a second
drill file?
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Rene others,
it is timely that Sean raised this issue because I have been
fighting with related issues. In my case I have a very complex board outline
where I have
have your cake and eat it and you don't need to
maintain a separate 'single' copy for DRC
one time (not using the above method) we panelized a board and one trace
didn't get in the clipboard
half the bds had one trace missing
Dennis Saputelli
Brad Velander wrote:
Mike
so in essence what you are saying is too avoid partial planes?
Dennis Saputelli
Michael Reagan wrote:
Brad wrote:
understand what your fab shops have told you. Both are layers with mostly
copper rather than mostly laminate, should be absolutely no difference
between the two if you
to another shop and it came with a big cutout
from now on we will draw all the tab features
these kind of details make it tough
Dennis Saputelli
Bob Wolfe wrote:
Abdulrahman wrote
The bottom line is that the photoplot people can panelize in seconds,
literally. They do it all day, every day. If you
i never really liked those guys, but i'm not sure why
something always rubbed me the wrong way
Dennis Saputelli
Mike Reagan wrote:
Absolutely the way to go. A fab vendor is panalizing every board you do
anyway, even if you
only want separate boards delivered, they break them out
I don't think so, at least for my purposes, based on a quick a dirty
look at it when i first got it
Dennis Saputelli
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
Brad (and anyone else who wants to chime in):
Does CAMtastic work OK when you panelize an array of the same PCB? I may
want to try
for me and is long long
gone wrote that program
i wrote the one that did dxf2pcb called 'AutoLink' and also 'Protool'
Dennis Saputelli
John C. Echols wrote:
I'm using Protel Autotrax 1.61 ... as soon as you stop laughing, I need
some help.
I have Protool pcbtodxf and it worked fine to use
a few minutes on it
actually now that i recollect someone who worked for me and is long long
gone wrote that program
i wrote the one that did dxf2pcb called 'AutoLink' and also 'Protool'
Dennis Saputelli
John C. Echols wrote:
I'm using Protel Autotrax 1.61 ... as soon as you stop laughing, I
another idea if you have a copy is to try autosketch
it's pretty cheap
also maybe camtastic
as i mentioned R14 got real uppity about itself
Dennis Saputelli
Bagotronix Tech Support wrote:
John:
I have Autocad LT95 and used to use Protel v2.8. LT95 had DXF import
problems. It wouldn't
1 - 100 of 557 matches
Mail list logo