--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/5014/
--
New ticket #5014 by required
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4901/
--
New update by mconley
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4901
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4922/
--
New ticket #4922 by mblythe
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4920/
--
New update by mblythe
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4920
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4921/
--
New ticket #4921 by mblythe
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4920/
--
New ticket #4920 by mblythe
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board
Status: New
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4896/
--
New update by almt
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4896
Reply:
--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4896/
--
New update by almt
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board > Ticket #4896
Reply:
I installed ReviewBoard yesterday on CentOS 7 with the command 'yum install
ReviewBoard'. We got it working by making all files owned by apache.
Today, I updated the software through easy_install and manually
updated/upgraded my site and tried to tighten up the file permissions.
The
the
user's credentials. Is that correct?
Thanks
-Matthew
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You
is the one controlled by
easy_install, I've even looked for other ReviewBoard files elsewhere on the
filesystem, there aren't any.
Matthew Rathbone
==
matthew.rathb...@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Christian Hammond christ...@beanbaginc.com
wrote:
Hi Matthew,
This looks like
list')
Googling around seems to show that this usually happens when running a
version 1.x.x site on a 2.x.x database, but that's not the case here. Any
ideas? I'm at a loss.
Thanks for any help!
Matthew
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack
they'll
both show up when you go to publish). But I understand your point.
Nothing comes to mind how to make this more obvious, however. Any
suggestions?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https
are
you publishing them ad-hoc?
The usual workflow is to add a comment, save it, add another, etc. and
then publish all of your comments as a single review.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons
he's on vacation or some such and it doesn't happen for a while.
That said, he just posted 2.0.10 packages to -testing yesterday (see
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/reviewboard/l_yQWrIKH54).
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack
' under the hood?
(Less OT) For that matter, it might be nice if this could commit (or at
least arrange to pre-fill the commit message) with the review request
summary/description...
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board
On 2014-09-03 15:59, Christian Hammond wrote:
On September 3, 2014 at 12:54:59 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2014-09-03 14:20, Christian Hammond wrote:
If there’s a central person who is responsible for pushing the changes,
what he can do is, using RBTools, run:
$ rbt patch review
be able to help out. However he seems to have
a somewhat erratic schedule, so don't panic if he doesn't jump in right
away.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy
it works the way it does.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you
.)
That said, are you using 2.x? Because this is reportedly addressed. See
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2713.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com
post-review.
See also https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/0.6/.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
is
the encoding of INI_de.h? Given the error and the name of the file, I
am guessing it is not ASCII?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http
for any repository in the current location. Is that possible?
...no? RB needs to know what repo the diff is for.
Would you want to add an option to rbt post to specify a repository?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board
number of broken segments.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you
hidden rows in
the 'review' view, similar to how you can expand hidden rows in the 'diff'
view. Would this be possible to add in a future version of ReviewBoard?
...this also sounds like an interesting idea.
(¹ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1426)
--
Matthew
--
Get
comment makes me wonder...)
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you
)
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
that or else the scm tool will
need to be able to produce those as well as parse them. This also
assumes that the scm tool is responsible for, or at least can override,
how the diff is applied, which may not be the case; I don't know RB's
guts well enough to know.)
--
Matthew
--
Get
On 2013-11-19 17:14, David Trowbridge wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
The good news is that this means I can now verify that bug 3011¹ is fixed
(can someone with ability to do so please close it? bonus points for
amending the release notes to mention the bug
On 2013-11-12 15:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/12/2013 03:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
After upgrading my RB server machine to Fedora 19 (was 18) and Review
Board to 1.7.17 (from 1.7.12 IIRC), I am no longer able to see diffs; I
am getting the spinning 'please wait' indicators
On 2013-11-13 11:54, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:51 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-11-12 15:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/12/2013 03:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
After upgrading my RB server machine to Fedora 19 (was 18) and Review
Board to 1.7.17 (from 1.7.12 IIRC), I
On 2013-11-13 11:54, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/12/2013 03:13 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
After upgrading my RB server machine to Fedora 19 (was 18) and
Review Board to 1.7.17 (from 1.7.12 IIRC), I am no longer able to
see diffs; I am getting the spinning 'please wait' indicators
On 2013-11-13 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Matthew, can you please try
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ReviewBoard/1.7.18/1.fc19/noarch/ReviewBoard-1.7.18-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
Diffs appear, no JS errors. Thanks.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
case better than it seems to be doing?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message
://nowhere/r/209/diff/ @441: ReferenceError: Can't find variable: RB
Any ideas?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org
requests.
Does this mean that bug 3011¹ is fixed?
(¹ http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3011)
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let
not seeing any errors, but I'm also not getting a new draft.
Has anyone dealt with this situation before? Is there a trick to making
a new revision of a review request that is owned by a different user?
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack
.
What I'd recommend is to create a new review request to replace that one,
and discard the old one with a link to the new.
I was trying to avoid this as it would lose the history associated
with the existing review request.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
On 2013-10-28 17:46, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-28 17:27, David Trowbridge wrote:
It looks like we set borders on textarea but not input.
I guess we'd probably be willing to accept a patch for adding
@textarea-border-color to other input elements that if you were to put
one together
, but also the user name / password
fields on the login page.
Thanks,
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
, and are legible as a result.
Can you work around this with user stylesheets of your own?
Unfortunately I have not figured out how to make either of my main
webkit browsers add their own style rules for specific sites :-(.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
On 2013-10-21 07:05, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:41 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
If you've thought about this before
. (And of course it is borrowing a
well-known wiki concept; reusing existing ideas is usually a good thing.)
Bonus points for adding 'trivial' to the e-mail subject for changes so
indicated.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board
On 2013-10-17 16:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Wait... what happened to 1.8? :-)
1.8 is becoming 2.0.
Here's a brief summary of what's changed since 1.7:
[...]
Thanks. Sounds very cool and exciting!
* Given the rewrite, we have
On 2013-10-18 17:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Is there is a 'sandbox' server running the bleeding edge anywhere? I
suppose I could always roll my own, but it would be cool if there was a
convenient way for curious folks to play around
On 2013-10-18 17:37, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-18 17:19, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yep. demo.reviewboard.org and reviews.reviewboard.org are running this
(though a week out of date I think).
Hmm, both of those 403 for me
of
what's changing to warrant the major version bump? (Also, what new
features there will be?)
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http
diff format instead of trying to do side-by-side
could 'fix' this? (You'd lose inter-line diff, but I suppose it would be
better than nothing.)
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https
spec most closely matches EL6 (I forget offhand what
that is).
I would definitely file a bug per Stephen's recommendation.
--
Matthew
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy
is orders of magnitude worse :-).
(At least in RB comments are related to reviews... In gerrit, *small*
reviews suffer from where's the comment?.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
On 2013-08-23 07:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-).
(Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated
optparse... now that's interesting...)
optparse
Review Board 1.7.13 release.
So I took a look at api-get, but can't figure out how to get individual
fields out of a request. Am I missing something? (Note: I need to do
this in shell, and don't know of an easy way to parse JSON in shell; I
was hoping rbt would do that for me...)
--
Matthew
On 2013-08-22 15:35, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
So I took a look at api-get, but can't figure out how to get individual
fields out of a request. Am I missing something? (Note: I need to do this
in shell, and don't know of an easy way
practices using extensions to achieve this?
IIRC this is incomplete... if you ever find/have/make an example, please
share, as this has been on my wish list also for some time. (RB 1.8 is
supposed to be better.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
My Review Board 1.7.10 installation seems to be working for the most part.
I can navigate and update all the admin pages and can view the dashboard,
groups, submitters, etc but I am having an issue displaying any of the API
url's. The browser wants to download them instead of display them. It
342, i
n post_request
rbtools.commands.CommandError: Error creating review request: Unable to
authenti
cate with the repository using the provided credentials (HTTP 403, API
Error 218
)
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 11:23:09 AM UTC-7, Matthew Dawes wrote:
My Review Board 1.7.10 installation seems
aren't dealing with an existing
commit. In either case you are probably talking about separate
tools/extensions at least for git and svn, possibly even two different
ones for git (for pre- and post-commit review).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
=' rather than 'hb=' with your gitweb
instance.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group
page). Even better would be to have a full-blown hover
element that would show the 'full' summary information (i.e. at least
summary and description).
Thoughts/Comments?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us
or download links found for ReviewBoard
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('ReviewBoard')
While it is probably desirable to fix this, is there a reason you are
not using Stephen's EPEL packaged version?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
it to be rewritten.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
: (1045, Access denied for user
'admin'@'localhost' (using password: YES)) .Doesn't the 1.7.7.1 version
supports postgressql?
I'm using it :-).
More likely RB setup is not finding it. You are probably missing python
bindings for postgresql or some such.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review
, but if not it is (AFAICT) solely from a lack of glue. Between
RB's extensions and event system, you should be able - without much
difficulty - to write an RB extension to either publish events and/or
fire off automated regression tests and such.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
On 2013-05-02 06:36, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:35:18 PM UTC+1, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If
you entered a passphrase when generating the key then I found
ReviewBoard can't handle it.
Well
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If you entered a
passphrase when generating the key then I found ReviewBoard can't handle it.
Well... yeah. Where would RB store the pass-phrase? :-)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project
TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating
'RB.setFileAttachmentComments({
})')
...and indeed it seems there is something wrong with the page content.
Has anyone seen this before, or have an idea what might be wrong?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
?
Unfortunately, no, just that I first noticed it about a week ago (and
given others are commenting, presumably it only affects some users of a
given RB instance).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
...
In the meantime, go into My Account, uncheck the Open An Issue, save,
re-check, save. Should fix it.
That fixed it; thanks!
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
failures still sounds
to me more like a server problem.
While you're checking your browser console logs, it is probably worth
also checking the server logs if there is any message that would
indicate a problem generating the diffs.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate
load on the server and network because it is event driven (the
server and network only need to do work when an event actually happens;
you aren't making them work every poll-interval just to tell you that
nothing has changed).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today
all major debug features such as stepping,
watching, etc. I am new in Python.
Does eclipse not allow you to specify the working directory when you run
the program for debugging?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user
to Review Board.
Is there a (CLI) way to get field information (e.g. description) from a
review request?
I need this for the merge command of my git-rb script.
Thanks,
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us
? If not please suggest your development
workflows.
Probably not, but why can you not just cd to the repository from which
you actually want to push changes, and then specify the path to your
modified post-review.py?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http
like a good excuse to develop the extension system to allow
an extension to implement the logic. Probably this just needs an
internal field if a request can be merged that can be set by the extension.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org
Does anyone have an RB extension that adds a custom field to a review
request, that they would be willing to share as an example of how to do
this?
(On a related note, am I missing something, or is the extra_data field
still not in 1.7.x?)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board
file URL' for your repository is not set
correctly. Make sure it is set to a template from which cgit will accept
a *blob ID* (not a commit ID) to retrieve a specific version of a file.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy
.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
generically know that there exists a review request draft, the
best you will be able to do is list all requests, query the status of
each, and note any that are drafts.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
On 2013-02-16 02:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com wrote:
Drifting even further off topic, have you ever given thought to using patience
diff in RB? (I've seen spots where it would have been an improvement... might
help
?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
.
Is this correct/expected? Known issue? I would have expected to see a
reverse of the changes to foo.cpp from revision 1.
(This is with RB 1.7.5. Also, the merge base between revisions 1 and 2
differs, which may be part of the trouble.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project
with changes.
(There's lots of stuff - like this - that I'd actually love to work on
if I could justify doing it 'on the clock'...)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
; just get basic ssl
working and - if needed - disable regular http.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
to discard the request.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
and don't know how to recreate it from the 'compiled'
version.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
On 2013-01-19 22:34, Raja wrote:
Hi Matthew
It looks you also need reviews.can_edit_reviewrequest for this to done.
Just granting can change status seems to throw a permission denied error
when trying to check if the user can edit the request. The UI doesnt
reflect this, but the server log
at the specified path.
This sounds suspiciously like Jonathan's recent git troubles... is your
server using SELinux? If yes, have you checked your SELinux log for denials?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us
missing something?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
information from local Git
repository
(Possibly) silly question... have you tried without the .git? (I would
have guessed that is not wanted, although I could be wrong.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3707/
(send mail when closing requests) would make 1.7.2... might I expect it
for 1.7.3?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
! It will be good to get
some of the other fixes out (e.g. renames and disabling git copy config,
prompt on stderr, etc.).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
, and the still-in-beta version
18 thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
likewise for the
appropriate database backend, as well as any VCS or authentication
method in use; those are just the ones I'm using.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
compared to RB.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard
before publishing and how to
publish it also. What is the work flow.
I'm having a similar issue. If you manage to create a working example,
PLEASE share it, as one is desperately needed for those of us that
aren't intimately familiar with RB's source.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review
of the request branch on the
web interface, but if we can get/set it through the API, I could at
least write a functional 'git rb merge'.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
the '+', and as I recall, I had to put it there.
I'm also on Fedora 18.)
p.s. Big thanks to Stephen for the packages!
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
? I feel like I remember hearing about something
similar on the list...
I'm on RB 1.7.1 upgraded from 1.7.0 rc1 from 1.7.0 beta 4; maybe I
missed a step upgrading?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
httpd?)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
for the help (also thanks to Stephen, again, for the package...
sheesh, 0.7.7 didn't last long, did it? :-) ).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
