Martin Man wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Man wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to use shared interface in my zone and configure it using dhcp
when I invoke zoneadm -z boot.
This is not possible without IP Instances. To do this with a single
interface
you will also need
Hi Martin,
Martin Man wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to use shared interface in my zone and configure it using dhcp
when I invoke zoneadm -z boot.
What's the best strategy to do it? I haven't found anything related to
dhcp in zonecfg manpage and searching b.o.o for zonecfg dhcp does not
reveal anyth
DJR wrote:
Hello,
a question,
I have dedicated NIC for two of my zones, but when I created the zones it
looked as it created it like a VIP, see output below...
That is a logical interface.
is that normal? I thought the zone would be using e1000g1 or e1000g2 by itself
zonecfg -z info
Hi Peter,
Peter Lees wrote:
hi folks
is it possible to do networking between global & non-global zones *without*
using a physical interface?
You need an interface which is plumbed and the logical interfaces
are created on.
Traffic between zones will not leave the system, however. IP will
Hi Manish,
Only IP Instances have been putback into Nevada. VNICs and flow management
are not there
yet. There is a DVD image based on build 61 that was posted at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/snapshots/ but there was a
problem
in the SPARC image. As soon as testing of the reb
Hi Jason, coming late into this thread,
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Thanks Jeff.
FYI, These zones will be allocated to different clients each with root
access to their zone and running their own software.
Whether you choose to provide root access to the non-global zone users
has no effect on the
Hi Manish,
You specify it within the non-global zone. Use /etc/sysidcfg to create on
initial boot or on your own create /etc/hostname.ifX, and when you reboot
the zone, it just works. With exclusive IP Instances, the network control
is as if you had a separate system. don't forget to set up ro
Hi Ramesh,
Ramesh Mudradi wrote On 05/11/07 02:54,:
I am facing some routing issue with the local zone talking to outside network.
Here is the setup that I have:
Configured global zone (bge0) to 10.x.180.0 network
Configured local zone (bge1:1) to 10.x.230.0 network
local zone can talk to the
Hi Michael, I haven't seen any other followup...
Michael A. Haines wrote On 05/08/07 17:53,:
Hi Jeff,
Do you want to set up quotas from the global zone or from the
non-global zone?
To be honest I thought this would be best done from a global zone, but
please let me have your thoughts. Can
Hi Matt, that is what happens with the share IP in the original zones.
You can get better IP isolation, including being able to set routes within
a non-global zone with IP Instances in recent Nevada builds, and this is
targeted for Solaris 10 7/07.
check out http://www.opensolaris.org/os/proj
Using the FAQ's example, you must create the /usr/local file system in the
global zone's /usr.
My own convention of individual zones' personal /usr/local is to use the
method described in the FAQ (thanks Jeff), and put the 'special' directory
in the zone's zonepath.
zonecfg:twilight> add fs
This how to guide has the steps to do exactly what you are trying to do.
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/howtoguides/containersLowRes.jsp
See "Creating the First Web Server Container" about 2/3 of the way through.
Steffen
reply-to set to alias
prakash wrote On 05/03/07 08:16,:
Hi,
Pleas
Mike Gerdts wrote On 03/17/07 10:33,:
On 3/15/07, Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(But you'd need to wait for some other changes to the networking
before you can run a DHCP server in a zone. I don't think that's
possible today).
In my lab, I have DHCP servers working in sparse non
Jeff Victor wrote On 03/15/07 20:31,:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 3/15/07, Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Inheriting 1, 2, or 3 of these dir's isn't called anything, and very
little,
if any, testing has been done to see what happens with those.
See http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-159
Darren J Moffat wrote On 02/14/07 14:30,:
Menno Lageman wrote:
Robert Gordon wrote:
So could we all agree that:
An NFS Server in a zone means that the namespace it exports is
restricted
to that zone only. By that i mean no global zone access to that
namespace,
nor would that namespace
Hi Krzys,
Krzys wrote On 02/05/07 12:39,:
hello, I just got into zones and I have few questions:
is there any way to create zone with some additional customizations?
here is what I did:
# zonecfg -z titan1
titan1: No such zone configured
Use 'create' to begin configuring a new zone.
zonecfg:ti
Hi Dave,
Dave Bevans wrote On 01/09/07 08:16,:
Hi.
I have a customer using SOL 10 1/06 on a development box, needs to
control Hardware resource allocation for software licensing. Wants to
create container/zone, with a separate /var. Also wants to know about
shared packages for creating min
Hi Gino,
Is it possible that UNIX sockets are being used instead of INET? That would eliminate the TCP and IP
protocol processing down and up the stack required for IPC. X Windowing System does that--if the
client and server are co-located, they don't create IP connections. With the web and DB
My first guess would be a name resolution issue, possibly DNS.
Set your non-global zones to not boot automatically, and then look at one as it
boots.
Jason Gallagher - Sun Microsystems wrote On 12/18/06 20:09,:
Team,
*Please respond to me directly, for I'm not on this alias.*
Sparse local zo
Hi Jay,
Jay Sisodiya wrote On 12/14/06 15:59,:
Hello,
I have 2 interfaces ce0 and ce2 in an ipmp group. When configuring
zones, I am specifying ce0 and physical,
add net
set address=10.2.2.212
set physical=ce0
end
What happens when ce0 goes down ? Understood for running zone the i/p
will f
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 12/12/06 16:54,:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Is it safe to generalize that non-LOFS file systems in Solaris 10 do
not allow cross-zone interaction? procfs does not. namefs does not.
tmpfs does not. sockfs does not. doors does not. What about all the
others (I can't
Hi Dan,
Dan Price wrote On 12/12/06 13:59,:
On Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 10:47AM, Glenn Faden wrote:
Names pipes may be used between zones when Trusted Extensions is
enabled. The policy for data flow between zones is generally more
restrictive when TX is enabled, but in this case it is slightly more
Dan Price wrote On 12/11/06 16:28,:
On Mon 11 Dec 2006 at 04:14PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
Mike, do you have a working code snippet that I can test? I have a 6/06
system, a Nevada build50 system, and can create others. I could write the
code myself, but if you already have a tested sample...
I
r ago, thinking I was being clever...
Didn't work :-(
Let me know if you have a different experience.
-- MikeE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steffen
Weiberle
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 7:27 AM
To: zones-discuss@opens
I have no reason to believe the following will not work, but I would like to
confirm
If a file system is shared between two zones (via lofs), can named pipes be used to communicated
between the two zones?
If the filesystem is mounted read/write in one and read-only in the other, will this
mber 6, 2006 11:49 am
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have VLAN tagging working OK THanks to the James Carlson, Mike
Gerdts, Steffen Weiberle in particular.
Now I have a further question and similar help will be muchly
appreciated.
I have IPMP i
Brian Kolaci wrote On 10/20/06 13:41,:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Brian Kolaci wrote:
Thats how I came to the conclusion with the current implementation of
getting load averages coming from processor sets rather than the load
running within a zone prohibits the sole use of FSS to consolidate
sendma
check /etc/inet/ipnodes, which gets read before /etc/hosts.
IP out of a non-global zone issues (whether to an external box or
another co-located zone) warrent checking this right away.
James Hebert wrote On 10/17/06 15:04,:
Thanks - Oracle is running fine - its the Unigraphics code
and intra-
Hi Roshan,
You need to configure the VLAN interfaces. If your VLAN Id is VVV, you
will have ceVVV000 for that VLAN on ce0 and ceVVV001 for that VLAN on
ce1. Multiply the VLAN number by 1000 and add it to the device
instance (in this case either 0 or 1).
So for VLAN 753 on ce1 and zone2,
add
I do similar, but use the builtin interface, with a dummy address that
is on the same network as my zones. Since this is set up after boot, I
do need to remember to start my zones manually before the demo.
Steffen
Jay Calaus wrote On 09/22/06 10:35,:
James,
Fortunately, it doesn't need to
Thanks, Alex.
Any idea when this will be integrated? So many BFUs, so few systems.
Thanks
Steffen
Alexander Kolbasov wrote On 09/22/06 16:13,:
"Steffen" == Steffen Weiberle writes:
Steffen> Hi Alexander,
Steffen> I am just starting to take a look at these, but a
Hi Alexander,
I am just starting to take a look at these, but a general question
right off. Both docs mention that a CPU cap can be set on any project
or any zone. However, it is not clear whether the caps can be set on
projects in the global zone only, or whether they can be set on
projects
I would agree. Virtualization covers a spectrum, and within what we
have and are working on, it goes from dynamic system domains with
physical separation of OS instances to Solaris Resource Manager, which
limits resource consumption within a single instance of Solaris and
does not do any other
lity in coaching our pool resources in this
particular fashion,
not mentioning what could be achieved with dynamic resource pooling and
its flexibility in doing more.
Your thoughts ?
Thanks
Ihsan
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote On 09/14/06 11:59,:
Hi again,
I am posting this
Ihsan Zaghmouth wrote On 09/14/06 11:59,:
Hi again,
I am posting this message just in case it was missed or forgotten.
*Can we assign the Zone to a pool and the Zone's Project to another pool ?*
I don't believe so. The pools should not be visible in a zone, as they
are a *system* resource, a
Jeff Victor wrote On 09/14/06 10:35,:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make any difference as to where or what kind of fs that the
zoneroot is mounted? and is there any difference with a whole root zone?
The situation is the same for both sparse and whole-root zones.
The key is whether or no
Jeff Victor wrote On 09/14/06 10:35,:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make any difference as to where or what kind of fs that the
zoneroot is mounted? and is there any difference with a whole root zone?
The situation is the same for both sparse and whole-root zones.
The key is whether or
I'm just catching up, and I would agree with David's assessment. If
you go back to the original email and your follow-on one, you will see
that the times listed are all subsecond. If you are noticing DNS
delays, they are probably multi-second, so something else is wrong.
Some snoops might help
Paula Van Wie wrote On 09/11/06 12:43,:
Please reply to me directly. Thanks
1. Should the zonepath, the directory that holds the local zone
definitions in the global zone be a separate filesystem, or simply a
directory under the root filesystem in the global zone?
It can be either. If you p
Menno Lageman wrote On 09/07/06 13:21,:
Irlando Barros wrote:
Hil all,
Couple question on Zones:
1. I have two resource pools setup splitting up the CPU's and would
like to associate different resource pools to different zones
a. I have found tons of docs on doing it when the zone is
con
Hi Fernando,
Not sure what the problem is. You will get one line in your output if
you are on the same subnet. I just tried this to an IP address on the
same system and one on another system on the same network.
However, that the address responding is not the address you sent it to
may be wh
I'd suggest a role with the "Maintenance and Repair" profile. This
will allow the authorized user(s) to assume that role and run /sbin/init.
This can be set per zone, from within the zone.
Something such as:
# roleadd -u -g -P "Maintenance and Repair" userinit
# usermod -u -P userinit
Pe
Jeff Victor wrote On 08/25/06 08:30,:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I have come across this myself and wondered whether it is worthy to
file an RFE for an option to see only what is happening in the default
pool. I understand the need to see the whole system, but for
applications that must run in
Hi Mike,
Filesystems must [1] be administered and managed from the global zone.
So, as you suggest, if multiple zones share a filesystem, one can use
up resources another would like to use. Your general UFS is shared
unless exclusively allocated to a zone by the global administrator.
This goe
I have come across this myself and wondered whether it is worthy to
file an RFE for an option to see only what is happening in the default
pool. I understand the need to see the whole system, but for
applications that must run in the global zone, it is of value to see
how that pool is doing as
Hi,
Customer is trying to use zones to consolidate systems. One of the
cost items is that they are charged per NFS client for NAS services.
So the customer is trying to mount NFS shares in the GZ and lofs mount
them to NGZs. I/O errors result when accessing the mount point from
the NGZ. This
Alastair Neil wrote On 08/22/06 10:49,:
On 8/22/06, *Steffen Weiberle* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Alastair,
Alastair Neil wrote On 08/22/06 08:59,:
> Hi I have a Sunfire V440 with 2 processors and 10Gbytes of memory
I have
Hi Alastair,
Alastair Neil wrote On 08/22/06 08:59,:
Hi I have a Sunfire V440 with 2 processors and 10Gbytes of memory I have
configured eight zones all using the second ce interface ce1. The port
is connected to a nortel buisiness policy switch running at 100Mbs/full
duplex. I am seeing una
Hi Jerry,
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/17/06 09:20,:
Steffen,
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/16/06 18:14,:
Steffen,
Thanks for your comments. Responses in-line.
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Jerry, this is great.
I have a few comments below.
Thanks
Steffen
1) "
Since I have wondered myself,...
Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote On 08/17/06 13:29,:
Hello
I tried finding the solution by scanning previous posts to this group,
and looking into manuals, but I haven't found the answer yet.
Where do I define the services (SMF) that a) get started by default in a
Padmalatha S wrote On 08/17/06 08:34,:
Hi there -
I'b been wanting to know this for while now.
Is there any simple method to know or classify
on a host which is running zones as which is
sparse and which is whole-root?
The zone names are very generic and doesnt give
a cl
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/16/06 18:14,:
Steffen,
Thanks for your comments. Responses in-line.
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Jerry, this is great.
I have a few comments below.
Thanks
Steffen
1) "Hard" vs. "Soft" RM configuration within zonecfg
We will enhance zon
Hi Jerry, this is great.
I have a few comments below.
Thanks
Steffen
1) "Hard" vs. "Soft" RM configuration within zonecfg
We will enhance zonecfg(1M) so that the user can configure basic RM
capabilities in a structured way.
Various existing and upcoming RM features ca
I am not a Veritas expert, but I figure that the reason folks ask for
Veritas in a zone is because they want all the behaviors they are used
to on a stand-alone system.
One reason for raw devices it to avoid the filesystem overhead. And
with Veritas, they'd want to use QuickIO if using VxFS to
I am not a Veritas expert, but I figure that the reason folks ask for Veritas in a zone is because
they want all the behaviors they are used to on a stand-alone system.
One reason for raw devices it to avoid the filesystem overhead. And with Veritas, they'd want to use
QuickIO if using VxFS to
Ah, fishing stories...
Containers and CPU-caps is what my customer really wanted when we ended up supporting FairShareII
for then on 2.5.1. The pre-cursor to SRM. They had 3,000 separate Netscape 2.x instances running on
a E4000, just two CPUs but mucho $$ of memory back then. NS would call net
Based on an internal question of how many logical interfaces a non global zone can have, I did some
sanity testing. But before that, the general answer include:
There is no limit to the interfaces presented to a NGZ
Limits, if any, are at the system level.
Currently the default is 256 total (1
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/02/06 17:41,:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
If anything like Jave ES applications (directory, web, app server,
etc.) you need a full root zone to install into. I.e., remove all your
inherit-pkg-dir parts.
Or, you may be able to use this technique from the zones FAQ if
If anything like Jave ES applications (directory, web, app server, etc.) you need a full root zone
to install into. I.e., remove all your inherit-pkg-dir parts.
Steffen
Krzys wrote On 08/02/06 15:32,:
I did create zone, here is config for it:
[15:29:44] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /d/d1/zones/appdev/r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote On 08/02/06 05:59,:
And new semantics to allow that would have one twist: you really only
want to allow this zone-requested loopback when the filesystem to mount
is share(1M)'d to the zone. You can't allow zones to have arbitrary
loopback mounts created upon request. S
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/01/06 10:16,:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/01/06 09:32,:
Christine Tran wrote:
Hi,
I found an old email written by Amol a while ago stating in effect
that zones.cpu-shares has no meaning when the system is carved up
into different pools. I
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/01/06 09:32,:
Christine Tran wrote:
Hi,
I found an old email written by Amol a while ago stating in effect
that zones.cpu-shares has no meaning when the system is carved up into
different pools. I would like some clarification, directly, I have a
customer who want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote On 07/31/06 07:36,:
Hi all,
I have a customer with the following question
I'm curious on what the best way to propagate all the user accounts on
the global zone down to the zones that are already created.
The only way that I know is to just copy the files needed li
Hi Robert,
The Solaris format command works at the drive level. You should not be able to format only a part of
a drive, since that is all that you have been provided. You have provided all parts (via s*),
possibly, but they are individual pieces, not the whole drive as one. The label is not in
Hi meem,
Peter Memishian wrote On 05/09/06 22:03,:
> Yes, IPMP is IP Multipathing. Even if you have multiple addresses on
> the same subnet on different interfaces, as you do, it does not
> automatically enable IPMP.
Though the resulting configuration is unsupported and broken. That
is, if
Hi Tobias,
Yes, IPMP is IP Multipathing. Even if you have multiple addresses on the same subnet on different
interfaces, as you do, it does not automatically enable IPMP.
I would suggest trying your test with your web server in the global zone after configuring .34 in
the global as well, and
Hi Tobias,
First impression would that this is a routing issue.
What is the IP address of the global zone? Are you running IPMP?
Steffen
Tobias Oberstein wrote On 05/08/06 16:43,:
After spending many hours looking at ipmon/ethereal logs, I believe I've found
a explanation (a bug?) for the fol
Abhilash wrote On 05/03/06 10:04,:
Hi,
I have setup a siebel component called scs on a local zone. The application gets
installed fine and I can see it running and connecting to the database, however I
am unable to connect to this application i.e scs by using another tcl application
called ja
101 - 168 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
