On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same
in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it
[...]
I overlooked Krita. Krita uses Backspace as a BG Color Fill and
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 13:59 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same
in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it
could no
On 1/30/11, Christopher Curtis wrote:
So all I'm suggesting is that instead of simply producing PhotoShop
keybindings (which is a fine idea, IMO)
They already are produced
that an interested person actually look at the broader picture to see
if there is any accelerator convergence among
Hi!
Lately I've been discussing with a collegue of mine some differences
between Gimp and Photoshop and how long-time Ps user feel when seated
in front of Gimp. I know… I know… the neverending subject, but I'm not
trying to start the flame again, so… please keep your matches and petrol
away ;) —
On 1/30/11, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
Lately I've been discussing with a collegue of mine some differences
between Gimp and Photoshop and how long-time Ps user feel when seated
in front of Gimp. I know… I know… the neverending subject, but I'm not
trying to start the flame again,
Do you
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:43 +0100, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
The thing is, that we concluded that permamenet transition or even
occasional use of Gimp would be much more appealing for Ps-bred guys
(like me ;)) if one would have possibility to use the same (or at least
much similar) keyboard
Hi!
Lately I've been discussing with a collegue of mine some differences
between Gimp and Photoshop and how long-time Ps user feel when
seated in front of Gimp. I know… I know… the neverending subject,
but I'm not trying to start the flame again,
Do you genuinely expect us to believe
Von: Stephen Greenwalt stephengreenw...@gmail.com
* It seems to work best to put the entire project (all source, and all
build product) under a project folder in the Home directory.
* If possible, that should include a *copy *of any external
dependencies with environment variables (etc)
On 1/28/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Eric Grivel wrote:
Which is where my thought of a boot camp came in. What if there was a
group of potential new developers all struggling with the same learning
curve? Wouldn't it be great if an experienced Gimp developer could lead
the whole group through a
On 01/27/2011 03:56 PM, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
Boot Camp . . . good idea. Docs . . . good idea.
Let the newbie's like me (coming out of boot camp) write some
of the Docs.
Presently I have everything compiled and running under
I'd like to write a little bit on some of the topics.
*QA*
*
*
As a beginner developer, I'd like to know the place where answers to all my
stupid questions are answered. In one place.
E.g.:
- How to commit to git tree?
- What's the best way to submit a patch? When I asked this question on
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 08:39 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hmm I don't understand your reasoning. So you rather waste time manually
refactoring Java code than using Eclipse' excellent integrated
reafactoring features?
Yes, though your evaluation of excellent could be argued as
subjective.
On 28 January 2011 17:58, Michael J. Hammel mjham...@graphics-muse.org
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 08:39 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hmm I don't understand your reasoning. So you rather waste time manually
refactoring Java code than using Eclipse' excellent integrated
reafactoring
I'd just settle for good step by step instruction on getting a windows
cross compile working.
I've had no problem getting from git and compiling for Ububtu in a
Ubuntu VM, but whenever I ask how to set up the tools for windows
cross-compile I get hand-waving and oh just redefine your compiler
2011/1/28 Łukasz Czerwiński lc277...@students.mimuw.edu.pl:
I'd like to write a little bit on some of the topics.
QA
I think that for a start a Wiki with QA edited by everyone could be a good
solution. If it gets too complicated, it can be split in sections, pages,
categories and so on.
Such
On Friday, January 28, 2011, 19:08:43, Rob Antonishen wrote:
I'd just settle for good step by step instruction on getting a windows
cross compile working.
I posted the instructions to the list some time ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.gimp.devel/19202/focus=19203
--
Jernej
On 01/28/11 11:22, Patrick Horgan wrote:
* Shouldn't we standardize on a common development IDE (like Eclipse)?
If I am missing something in that area . . . let me know.
I think the only thing you're missing is that there is no need for we
to standardise. If you want to use an IDE that does
Hi,
why don't put those instractions on the site? Can be a good start point.
Massimo
Il 28/01/2011 19.20, Jernej Simončič ha scritto:
On Friday, January 28, 2011, 19:08:43, Rob Antonishen wrote:
I'd just settle for good step by step instruction on getting a windows
cross compile working.
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
I'd like to apologize to the list. I had responded to Kevin off-list
because most of my questions were specific to the upstream TinyScheme
project and had only peripheral impact to Script-fu development.
That's partly my fault. The references to
?ukasz Czerwin'ski wrote:
Maybe just a good documentation for GIMP source is needed? Once I tried to
patch TinyScheme interpreter to make it work faster. In files I was working
on was almost no comments.
TinyScheme is another project with little to no documentation. I would be
interested to
I am getting the impression that the Gimp project is trapped in a
chicken-and-egg problem with regard to attracting new contributors,
where the few core developers are too busy maintaining the product to
spend a lot of time helping new developers come on board.
Gimp is an extremely large and
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Eric Grivel g...@lumenssolutions.com wrote:
I am getting the impression that the Gimp project is trapped in a
chicken-and-egg problem with regard to attracting new contributors,
where the few core developers are too busy maintaining the product to
spend a lot
On 01/27/2011 04:43 PM, Eric Grivel wrote:
I am getting the impression that the Gimp project is trapped in a
chicken-and-egg problem with regard to attracting new contributors,
where the few core developers are too busy maintaining the product to
spend a lot of time helping new developers come
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Pete Bergstrom
petebergst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Eric Grivel g...@lumenssolutions.com wrote:
I am getting the impression that the Gimp project is trapped in a
chicken-and-egg problem with regard to attracting new contributors,
Maybe just a good documentation for GIMP source is needed? Once I tried to
patch TinyScheme interpreter to make it work faster. In files I was working
on was almost no comments.
Łukasz Czerwiński
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Boot Camp . . . good idea. Docs . . . good idea.
Let the newbie's like me (coming out of boot camp) write some of the Docs.
Presently I have everything compiled and running under Ubuntu, and I am just
reviewing the code to get some sort of context.
It is huge. Incredible, actually. Who wrote
On 01/27/2011 05:29 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
Feel free to drop by the #gimp and #gegl IRC channels to ask directed
smart questions for understanding the code. Also be aware that some of
the existing core contributors both dislike email in the first place,
and are cursed by knowledge thus not
Eric Grivel wrote:
Which is where my thought of a boot camp came in. What if there was a
group of potential new developers all struggling with the same learning
curve? Wouldn't it be great if an experienced Gimp developer could lead
the whole group through a series of exercises, designed to
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 16:56 -0700, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
* The project ought to be able to exist in a bubble . . . so as to
avoid confusion . . . regarding copies of dependencies that might
exist in the OS.
Automated builds are typically used to verify dependency issues on
multiple
On 01/27/2011 10:43 PM, Eric Grivel wrote:
I am getting the impression that the Gimp project is trapped in a
chicken-and-egg problem with regard to attracting new contributors,
where the few core developers are too busy maintaining the product to
spend a lot of time helping new developers come
On 01/28/2011 12:56 AM, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
It is huge. Incredible, actually. Who wrote all of this? Wow.
To see who wrote all this, visit https://www.ohloh.net/p/gimp/contributors
A few comments:
* It seems to work best to put the entire project (all source, and all
build
On 01/28/2011 05:22 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Our nightly builder is found at
http://gimptest.flamingtext.com:8012/waterfall which curiously enough
failed this night to my changes yesterday, but I fixed that already...
It's not curious, it's the beauty of the nightly build. It breaks
On 01/28/2011 05:01 AM, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
* Shouldn't we standardize on a common development IDE (like Eclipse)?
If I am missing something in that area . . . let me know.
IDE's are crutches. Based on the source tree I don't think the
developers use them but I could be wrong. I don't
Hello,
I 'm the breton translator for Gimp.
http://www.drouizig.org/index.php?lang=en
I noticed that the breton translations are not integrated to the last .exe file
for Windows despite the fact we put our translations on the branch
http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gimp/
May we hope that breton
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Greenwalt
stephengreenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I help? Here's an ultra-short overview of my background:
* Have some extra time I could devote . . . but will wait to quantify that
until I hear where you need help.
This happens from time to time,
Where can I help? Here's an ultra-short overview of my background:
* 18 years overall development experience including software engineering,
team leader, and senior IT management.
* Expert-level C, C++, C#, etc. knowledge.
* Extensive 3D design and development knowledge (texture mapping, 3D
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:35, Stephen Greenwalt
stephengreenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I help? Here's an ultra-short overview of my background:
I'm not a developer, but an long term Gimp user. I would suggest:
1. Go into the IRC channel to get direct feedback from the
(oops, forgot to send this)
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 13:32 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
[...]
Yes, but still even the most basic, non grouped command might still
be triggering a whole series of atomic micro undo operations that
would go into an undo group associated with the command.
I'm not
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Stephen Greenwalt
stephengreenw...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I help? Here's an ultra-short overview of my background: ...
Here's one suggestion that you could probably work on immediately, and would
prepare
you to work on other things if you are interested.
On 01/25/2011 09:35 AM, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
Where can I help?
It would be great to get help with bugs put on the 2.8 milestone:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=GIMPbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDtarget_milestone=2.8
Regards,
Martin
On 01/25/2011 05:52 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Google has just announced GSoC2011.
Schumaml: Will you be our GSoC master this year too? If so, that would
be great.
Regards,
Martin
--
My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/
Nightly GIMP, GEGL, babl tarball builds
Thanks for the info. I have used that filter many times, and I will take a
look at what you describe.
When light is cast against a 3D mesh, how that light diffuses over the
surface can also be affected by whether the ray caster is using vector
normals, or face normals, and other things. So,
On 01/26/2011 06:55 AM, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
Here's one suggestion that you could probably work on immediately,
and would prepare
you to work on other things if you are interested. Gimp has a
plug-in called Lighting Effects
Thanks for the info. I have used that filter
I have been reviewing Gimp / GEGL source code . . . to get familiar with
everything . . . so that I have some context to understand where I might
help the project.
But I am operating in a void because I don't understand:
- How the development effort is organized.
- Is there a team
On 01/26/2011 08:15 AM, Stephen Greenwalt wrote:
I have been reviewing Gimp / GEGL source code . . . to get familiar with
everything . . . so that I have some context to understand where I might
help the project.
But I am operating in a void because I don't understand:
* How the
Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@gmail.com) wrote:
While testing gimp with cppcheck I saw a lot of warnings caused by the
usage of scanf and fscanf without specifying a width limit.
For Gimp itself there is a bug report on this issue at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639203
I guess
On 24 January 2011 03:30, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com wrote:
If I add another '0' to the perl line I get a seg fault as well. Must
be a not-quite 64-bit limit.
Off-topic, but could someone explain why this isn't a stdio bug? Or is
it a known bug and this is the accepted workaround?
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote:
For Gimp itself there is a bug report on this issue at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639203
I guess I'll commit the patch attached to the bugreport soon unless
someone has a better suggestion.
But here, for
Nelson A. de Oliveira (nao...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote:
For Gimp itself there is a bug report on this issue at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639203
I guess I'll commit the patch attached to the bugreport soon unless
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Simon Budig si...@budig.de wrote:
Ah sorry, should have mentioned that. The bug report is older than your
mail to the list. We had a report on the %s conversion earlier which is
what the patch attached to the bug attempts to fix.
Here (also from your
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
Here (also from your patch):
snprintf (fmt_str, sizeof (fmt_str), %%%lds %%%lds %%%lds %%%lds,
sizeof (colorstr_r) - 1, sizeof (colorstr_g) - 1,
sizeof (colorstr_b) - 1, sizeof (colorstr_a) - 1);
Hi, I think this is already being adressed for 2.8. You are not the only
one who is bothered by this.
Basing the rate of change upon the current zoom is a very good idea! It
would definitly make sense to have the slider automatically cover a
range between 1px and
The subject and patch are pretty self-explanatory. Ran into this while
trying to do pointer arithmetic with these macros.
--xsdg
From 0ba4f676e3de80233b7ab184b11e527b61ab6158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens x...@xsdg.org
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:49:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 19:00 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
The subject and patch are pretty self-explanatory. Ran into this while
trying to do pointer arithmetic with these macros.
Thanks, fix pushed.
--mitch
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Hello, teams :)
Google has just announced GSoC2011.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/01/google-summer-of-code-announced-at-lca.html
The timeline is here:
http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2011/timeline
/crossposting-is-evil
Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
Who wants to
volunteer to prepare a list of bugs that are worth having a bounty put
on them?
I believe it can only work if the bugs are nominated by developers who
are prepared to mentor whoever is doing it for the bounty. I
Hi, I submitted a series of patches to bug 596410. This is my first time
working on Gimp and I'm new to git at well. I am very open to
suggestions on how to do things differently (better).
Eric
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On 01/23/2011 09:11 PM, Eric Grivel wrote:
Hi, I submitted a series of patches to bug 596410. This is my first time
working on Gimp and I'm new to git at well. I am very open to
suggestions on how to do things differently (better).
Hi and thanks, I'll review them soonish.
Regards,
Martin
--
Hi all,
I know that 2.7 is still in development and much will change but I hope
you don't mind some comments.
This is about the scale bars in the brush attribute editor etc.
I find it hard to use especially when I try to set the Size to something
less than 40 in the normal width. Is it
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
To make it crash:
perl -e 'print 5x210' | ./a.out
I believe the unbounded '%s' is a legitimate bug, but is the '%i'
assertion true?
The example it gives doesn't crash when I run it. Instead scanf
returns
Hi!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
To make it crash:
perl -e 'print 5x210' | ./a.out
I believe the unbounded '%s' is a legitimate bug, but is the '%i'
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
nao...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
To make it crash:
perl -e 'print 5x210' |
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:05 -0500, Eric Grivel wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at bug #596410 and in order to get to the import source in
gimpimage.c, I seem to have to #include ../file/gimp-file.h (to get to
the GIMP_FILE_IMPORT_SOURCE_KEY constant). Is it appropriate to include
a header file
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 23:01 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:10 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
I discussed this with Martin, and the outcome was to have a command
layer around the core, and not make it a 1:1 match of undo operations,
because undos are very atomic
Hi,
I'm looking at bug #596410 and in order to get to the import source in
gimpimage.c, I seem to have to #include ../file/gimp-file.h (to get to
the GIMP_FILE_IMPORT_SOURCE_KEY constant). Is it appropriate to include
a header file from a sibling directory this way?
Thanks,
Eric
Hi!
While testing gimp with cppcheck I saw a lot of warnings caused by the
usage of scanf and fscanf without specifying a width limit.
One example:
=
[./app/gegl/gimpcurvesconfig.c:392]: (warning) scanf without field
width limits can crash with huge input data. To fix this error message
On 01/19/11 23:15, Ilgaz Öcal wrote:
Hello,
After spending some time on IRC, I decided this is the best way to
report it. I noticed Nokia Ovi Store (an app store) carries a software
named SnapMe which is clearly not GPL using GIMP application icon. You
should be able to see when you click on
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:59 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 22:39 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
[...]
Martin wants to change the Undo system using the Command Pattern (see
comment 43 of the above report, and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_Pattern for an
GEGL (Generic Graphics Library) is a graph based image processing framework.
GEGL provides a graph based API and framework to do demand driven, cached, non
destructive image editing of larger than RAM images. Through babl it provides
support for a wide range of color models and pixel storage
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 15:10 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
I discussed this with Martin, and the outcome was to have a command
layer around the core, and not make it a 1:1 match of undo operations,
because undos are very atomic operation, whereas commands rather
correspond to undo groups of
gg at catking.net writes:
On 01/19/11 23:15, Ilgaz Öcal wrote: Hello, After
spending some time on IRC, I decided this is the best way to report
it. I noticed Nokia Ovi Store (an app store) carries a software
named SnapMe which is clearly not GPL using GIMP application icon.
You
On 01/21/2011 06:37 AM, Ilgaz Ocal wrote:
I got my lesson second time for attempting to help an open source
project in a positive manner.
Hi Ilgaz
Don't take one unfriendly reply from an arbitrary person as a
representative reply from everyone. There are many of us that appreciate
that
On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 09:46:29 Peter Daum wrote:
I read the announcement on the Gimp home page regarding Gimp 2.8,
which also mentions the broken graphic tablets support in GTK+ as a
showstopper without providing any details.
It's been talked about I think both in this list and in the
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 00:29 -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Um, sorry. Somehow I was under the impression that it should work. But
you are right, it's supported for plug-ins but not (yet) for Script-Fu
scripts.
Are translations enabled on all plug-ins? What about for
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 01:42 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/13/11, Sven Neumann wrote:
Why doesn't FX Foundry install its own po files in its own translation
domain? Script-Fu has support for registering an additional translation
domain.
Because you said it was impossible :)
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 00:27 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 01/06/2011 11:01 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
I just wanted to let you know that we have seen a dramatic increase in
donations since then. More than 120 people donated over the last 8 days
and sent us about 2,500 dollars. Perhaps it
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:So far
this has been the most constructive idea that has been brought up
in this thread. So why not? Let's try to come up with a list of bugs
that block the GIMP 2.8 release and put bounties on them. Who wants to
volunteer to
On 01/17/2011 11:32 PM, Mike Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org
mailto:s...@gimp.org wrote:So far this has been the most
constructive idea that has been brought up
in this thread. So why not? Let's try to come up with a list of bugs
that block
Sven Neumann wrote:
Um, sorry. Somehow I was under the impression that it should work. But
you are right, it's supported for plug-ins but not (yet) for Script-Fu
scripts.
Are translations enabled on all plug-ins? What about for Python scripts?
Having taken a look at a plugin just after I
I read the announcement on the Gimp home page regarding Gimp 2.8,
which also mentions the broken graphic tablets support in GTK+ as a
showstopper without providing any details.
I personally can't get my tablet working with anything newer than GTK+
2.18. I filed bug reports some months ago (for
I'd like to apologize to the list. I had responded to Kevin off-list
because most of my questions were specific to the upstream TinyScheme
project and had only peripheral impact to Script-fu development. I
probably should have posted to the list anyway (I have attached the
contents of my
Dear developers.
Firstly I would like to thank you warmly for a very good tool. I'm
personally very happy with the user interface and don't see it inferior
to Photoshop. I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth
asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:01 AM, ronald.arvids...@privat.utfors.se
ronald.arvids...@privat.utfors.se wrote:
snip I though would like to urge you to fix the 16 bit depth
asap. Its true that many end figure don't have 16 bit/channel but
before you get there its a VERY good thing to have.
On 1/14/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
It is well known in that a lot of people know it exists. As for it being
understood, not so much.
I hate to tell you, but JS indeed is broadly known and used. At least
half of Creative Suite is scripted in JS, and there is a whole
industry around various JS
On 01/14/2011 12:29 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/14/11, Kevin Cozens wrote:
It is well known in that a lot of people know it exists. As for it being
understood, not so much.
I hate to tell you, but JS indeed is broadly known and used. At least
half of Creative Suite is scripted in
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com
2010/4/8 Aurimas Juška aurimas.ju...@gmail.com:
I believe most users write script-fu scripts to automate commonly
repeated steps. Therefore, it would be even better to complete
On Friday 14 January 2011 21:59:36 Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Writing out recorded actions in any language shouldn't be the problem...
I think that this is one of the most wanted TODO for GIMP.
If it is not a problem, why noone
On 14.01.2011 21:59, Marco Ciampa wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 05:17:45PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com
I think script-fu would be ideal for such use. If you could record an
action, and then optionally convert it to a full script a lot of
It's just Troy... again. :-)
Once a year he writes about a free application that still isn't
there (according to him).
Some of the points point he expressed in the post may be valid (at
least technically), but they're not exactly breaking news for anyone.
Repeating year after year the same story
I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post a
replay.
Why bother? There are lots of false things in the Internet.
--tml
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Malix mal...@gmail.com wrote:
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html
I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post a
replay.
I personally have commented that blog post with what I feel, think and
know.
On 1/13/11, Malix wrote:
on this blog there is a post about Gimp that generate a lot of user
comments.
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html
I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post a
replay.
The fact that people don't understand
Hello
.. a word, if I may.. even if I'm not a gimp dev..
The fact that people don't understand what's happening in the project
can only mean two things:
1. What's happening in the project is not communicated to users.
That may be very well the case
But
Every day, I run into
Thanks Sven and Ek
I wasn't sure; I've been trying to use macports libraries as much as
possible.
So I've uninstalled all of the older gtks and x11s installed XQuartz
2.6.0 (xorg-server 1.9.3)
then gtk2
/opt/local/bin/pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 says 2.22.1
The problem persists, but I've
The tooltips are also displaying in the background,behind the dialogues.
Sean
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On 01/13/2011 01:39 AM, Malix wrote:
Hi all,
on this blog there is a post about Gimp that generate a lot of user comments.
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html
I think that someone of you that can replay to false things must post a
replay.
Bye
Massimo
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/13/2011 01:39 AM, Malix wrote:
Hi all,
on this blog there is a post about Gimp that generate a lot of user comments.
http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html
I think that someone of
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 15:36 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 1/11/11, Alexia Death wrote:
anything up. If you use strings that have translations in their
original location, you may even get translation working, tho Im not
sure how script-fu and localization interact specially in
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 14:41 +0700, Ek kian wrote:
i also experience this on OSX 10.6.2,
i use GIMP 2.6.8 compiled with GTK-OSX
(http://gtk-osx.sourceforge.net/).
but for GIMP from http://gimp.lisanet.de, it working ok and i think it
using X11.
i prefer using GIMP with GTK-OSX because it
Fortunatly last commets are all pro gimp made by some professionals.
This is what I like to hear. Øyvind you can be more happy now :) I
just use Gimp for a little photoretouch and I can not really answar to
people that point out a missing feature, I also never use photoshop
and can compare it with
901 - 1000 of 18788 matches
Mail list logo