To recap:
OP is having trouble building gimp-perl. He's told to install the
gimp-devel package. Fine advice, and something a newbie may not realize
at first.
Installing gimp-devel should've been enough, but he got another error.
After further analysis, it became apparent that he was missing the g
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:54:33PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 15:13, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
>
> > When distro people screw up and the support issues land here, I feel
> > justified to express my displeasure of having to clean up their
> > messes, especially since they
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> > like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> > out emails.
> >
> > A gimp-deve
On Sunday 11 December 2005 12:07, michael chang wrote:
[...]
> The essential question is if it is _NECESSARY_ to compile gimp-perl
> for the user's system. No one using SuSE has answered this.
>
> Do you currently have a SuSE 9.2 Pro system accesssable to you? It
> would be nice if you could get
On Sunday 11 December 2005 15:13, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
> When distro people screw up and the support issues land here, I feel
> justified to express my displeasure of having to clean up their
> messes, especially since they actually charge money and have a
> support and QA staff who have a jo
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:28:32PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-11-05 15:16]:
> >
> > So yes, let's end this, and next time, stick to facts instead of your
> > emotional attachment to your distro.
> >
>
> So Pat offers his hand and you slap his face, ca
* Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-11-05 15:16]:
>
> So yes, let's end this, and next time, stick to facts instead of your
> emotional attachment to your distro.
>
So Pat offers his hand and you slap his face, cannot accept a graceful
exit. You present yourself as a pathetic, immature, clas
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:41:47AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
>
> > A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> > indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
> > specificati
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> > like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> > out emails.
> >
> > A gimp-deve
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
> A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
> specification is broken.
> SuSE has a history of being shoddy in this regard, other exa
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
> I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
> like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
> out emails.
>
> A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
> indirectly
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:16, Manish Singh wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:10:50PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> > To Manish Singh:
> > SuSE and YaST2 work as well or better than any other file install
> > utility at solving dependencies. Thing you fail to realize is that
> > -devel files are n
On 12/10/05, BandiPat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 10 December 2005 20:12, michael chang wrote:
> > Trying to answer Pat's cry for a summary...
> [...]
> > --
> > ~Mike
> > - Just the crazy copy cat.
>
>
> Thanks Mike for the reprint. Also, no need to send out two mails. I'm
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:14:29PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Saturday 10 December 2005 13:50, Manish Singh wrote:
> [...]
> > So, with installing glib2-devel, did that work? If not, install
> > gtk-devel, pango-devel, and atk-devel as well.
> >
> > It's rather disappointing that after all these y
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:10:50PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> To Manish Singh:
> SuSE and YaST2 work as well or better than any other file install
> utility at solving dependencies. Thing you fail to realize is that
> -devel files are not dependencies. The main files don't need the
> -devel file
On Saturday 10 December 2005 13:50, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
> So, with installing glib2-devel, did that work? If not, install
> gtk-devel, pango-devel, and atk-devel as well.
>
> It's rather disappointing that after all these years, SuSE still
> can't get their package dependencies right.
>
> -Yo
On Saturday 10 December 2005 20:12, michael chang wrote:
> Trying to answer Pat's cry for a summary...
[...]
> --
> ~Mike
> - Just the crazy copy cat.
Thanks Mike for the reprint. Also, no need to send out two mails. I'm
on this list, so read the list mail. One mail to the list will
Trying to answer Pat's cry for a summary...
On 12/5/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just joined this list. This is my first post to it.
>
> I have been a happy GIMPer since 2000 until this year.
>
> After Red Hat ditched me 2 years ago, I switched to Mandrake 8.2
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:22:10PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-09-05 17:05]:
> > Maybe Novell could consider rehiring some of their linux staff and
> > coming up with a distribution entitled "Professionally Enabled". i
> > dunno, it has a certain flair a
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:20:17PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Aaron Luptak wrote:
> >On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Aaron Luptak wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>look at config.log - it found gimptool this time, but had another error.
> >>
> >>http://mykec.com/mykec/config.log
>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:22:10PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>
> You keep referring to 'rehiring .. linux staff'. I beleive what I
> read indicated that it was not the linux staff (SUSE) that was let go,
> but other divisions.
>
it is rumor on my part. i "heard" that the cuts were much gre
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-09-05 17:05]:
> Maybe Novell could consider rehiring some of their linux staff and
> coming up with a distribution entitled "Professionally Enabled". i
> dunno, it has a certain flair and appeal to it, you think?
Couple of points. The "Professional" tag was
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:16:03PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 23:29]:
> > i have been alive for several decades and have other experiences that
> > make me question the title "professional" in things and when describing
> > people. and not all
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 23:29]:
> i have been alive for several decades and have other experiences that
> make me question the title "professional" in things and when describing
> people. and not all experiences with the title have been bad either.
> it really simply seems
On Thursday 08 December 2005 23:26, Carol Spears wrote:
[...]
> i did not mean to say anything bad about suse. i have been alive for
> several decades and have other experiences that make me question the
> title "professional" in things and when describing people. and not
> all experiences with t
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:32:01PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2005 14:54, Carol Spears wrote:
> [...]
> > i did not suggest reporting a bug -- i have no idea how they work. i
> > suggested contacting them.
> >
> > it builds fine on debian. it builds fine on whatever seth is
On Thursday 08 December 2005 14:54, Carol Spears wrote:
[...]
> i did not suggest reporting a bug -- i have no idea how they work. i
> suggested contacting them.
>
> it builds fine on debian. it builds fine on whatever seth is working
> on. i read of other people using it. the suggestion that o
Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Owen wrote:
>
>> A. set the environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH to
>> /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig/
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
> /opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
>
> That's the only directory that's in my $PKG_CONFIG_PATH variable.
OK, almost give up, do you h
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 07:27:41PM +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:13:57AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> >> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 02:56]:
> >>> however, you are also not the person with the problem here
> >> But I t
Carol Spears wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:13:57AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
>> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 02:56]:
>>> however, you are also not the person with the problem here
>> But I too have the problem with gimp-perl and SUSE, and am *very* interested.
>>
> so
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:13:57AM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 02:56]:
> > however, you are also not the person with the problem here
>
> But I too have the problem with gimp-perl and SUSE, and am *very* interested.
>
so, are we safe to assume
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-08-05 02:56]:
> however, you are also not the person with the problem here
But I too have the problem with gimp-perl and SUSE, and am *very* interested.
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org
this email was great. you are competent and know what you are doing.
however, you are also not the person with the problem here
nice read though
carol
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/m
Owen wrote:
Myke C. Subs wrote:
Owen wrote:
The problem lies in where you have gimp-2.x installed.
That is what the error message is saying.
I have gimp-2.x installed right where the SuSE 9.2 RPM said to put it.
fair enough, but where is that gimp-2.0 executable?
/opt/gnome/bin/gimp-2.0
On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/gnome/bin> ls -l gimptool*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-12-05 11:52 gimptool -> gimptool-2.0
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root10660 2005-11-10 02:00 gimptool-2.0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-12-05 11:52 g
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-07-05 20:50]:
> i am having problems with this because i have been using a different
> distribution, and once you figure out how they work together -- well,
> you can even see very very fine points where they don't.
they are all the same only different.
> to
Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Owen wrote:
>
>>
>> The problem lies in where you have gimp-2.x installed.
>> That is what the error message is saying.
>
>
> I have gimp-2.x installed right where the SuSE 9.2 RPM said to put it.
fair enough, but where is that gimp-2.0 executable?
/opt/gnome/bin/gimp-2.0
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:05:04PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-07-05 19:07]:
> > >Q. Where is the gimp-2.0.pc file?
> > >A. most likely in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig
> >
> > Nope. It's in /opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
>
> You, at least, have one. I have a SU
* Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-07-05 19:07]:
> >Q. Where is the gimp-2.0.pc file?
> >A. most likely in /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig
>
> Nope. It's in /opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
You, at least, have one. I have a SUSE install almost strictly rpm
which has gimp-2.2.8-9 and there is *no* gimp-2.0
Carol Spears wrote:
inspite of my couple of mistyped instructions, this should have worked.
i am curious if you have gimptool installed now after installing the
developer package from your distribution (was it suse?).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/gnome/bin> ls -l gimptool*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
Carol Spears wrote:
what does "pkg-config --modversion gimp-2.0" report?
2.0.4
pkgconfig had to be installed due to dependencies when I installed
glib2-devel.
Myke
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berk
Aaron Luptak wrote:
On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aaron Luptak wrote:
look at config.log - it found gimptool this time, but had another error.
http://mykec.com/mykec/config.log
Looks like you're missing glib.h - on my SuSE system, it's at
/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0
Carol Spears wrote:
inspite of my couple of mistyped instructions, this should have worked.
i am curious if you have gimptool installed now after installing the
developer package from your distribution (was it suse?).
Nope. When I query YaST for "gimp" no such thing as "gimptool" appears
as
Owen wrote:
The problem lies in where you have gimp-2.x installed.
That is what the error message is saying.
I have gimp-2.x installed right where the SuSE 9.2 RPM said to put it.
Q. Where is that
A. Unless you tell it otherwise, it is looking at /usr/lib/pkgconf
Q. Where is the gimp-2.0.pc
Myke C. Subs wrote:
> checking for gimp-2.0... no
> checking for GIMP - version >= 2.0.0... no
> *** Could not run GIMP test program, checking why...
> *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
> for the
> *** exact error that occured. This usually means GIMP was inc
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 04:07:41PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
>
> >thank you for sticking with it.
>
> I *require* "Add Glow" in the work that I do with The GIMP. I have no
> choice but to stick with it. :)
>
> >try editing this script to use /opt/gnome instead of /usr/lo
On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Luptak wrote:
>
> > look at config.log - it found gimptool this time, but had another error.
>
> http://mykec.com/mykec/config.log
Looks like you're missing glib.h - on my SuSE system, it's at
/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0/glib.h . I'd gues
Carol Spears wrote:
thank you for sticking with it.
I *require* "Add Glow" in the work that I do with The GIMP. I have no
choice but to stick with it. :)
try editing this script to use /opt/gnome instead of /usr/local :
http://www.gimp.org/source/howtos/gimpenv
OK.
then type "source g
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:22:51PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >it is should be easy to install gimp-perl.
>
> Most everything's easy once you know what to do and how to do it.
>
> Learning what to do and how to do it is the hard part.
>
> >1) make sure you have libgimp-de
Carol Spears wrote:
it is should be easy to install gimp-perl.
Most everything's easy once you know what to do and how to do it.
Learning what to do and how to do it is the hard part.
1) make sure you have libgimp-dev installed from your distribution. it
might also be called gimp-dev.
"gi
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:15:10PM +1100, Owen Cook wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:56:57PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 17:52]:
> > > >
> > > > 5) look at /etc/ldconfig and make sure that "/
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Carol Spears wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:56:57PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 17:52]:
> > >
> > > 5) look at /etc/ldconfig and make sure that "/usr/local/lib/" is in the
> > > list of paths there, if it isn't, add it.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:56:57PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 17:52]:
> >
> > 5) look at /etc/ldconfig and make sure that "/usr/local/lib/" is in the
> > list of paths there, if it isn't, add it.
> >
>
> there is *no* /etc/ldconfig in the SUSE d
* Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 17:52]:
>
> 5) look at /etc/ldconfig and make sure that "/usr/local/lib/" is in the
> list of paths there, if it isn't, add it.
>
there is *no* /etc/ldconfig in the SUSE distros. There is an
executable, /sbin/ldconfig.
--
Patrick Shanahan
it is should be easy to install gimp-perl. there are a lot of different
ways to do it and a lot of different explanations of how other people
personally do this with their own system. i learned this in 1998 and it
still works without a lot of explanation from others.
1) make sure you have libgim
On 12/6/05, Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 16:40]:
> > Carol Spears wrote:
> > >
> > >it is easy to build gimp-perl. get the tarball and open it.
> > >
> > >type "perl Makefile.PL"
> > >soon after type "make"
> > >when that is completed,
On 12/6/05, Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> > it is easy to build gimp-perl. get the tarball and open it.
> I downloaded the tarball yesterday, opened it and attempted to install
> it. I am not green with regard to installing from source. I just don't
> prefer to
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:39:11PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >
> >it is easy to build gimp-perl. get the tarball and open it.
> >
> >type "perl Makefile.PL"
> >soon after type "make"
> >when that is completed, as root type "make install"
>
> I downloaded the tarball yeste
* Myke C. Subs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12-06-05 16:40]:
> Carol Spears wrote:
> >
> >it is easy to build gimp-perl. get the tarball and open it.
> >
> >type "perl Makefile.PL"
> >soon after type "make"
> >when that is completed, as root type "make install"
...
> As root:
> -
> linux:/home/my
Carol Spears wrote:
it is easy to build gimp-perl. get the tarball and open it.
type "perl Makefile.PL"
soon after type "make"
when that is completed, as root type "make install"
I downloaded the tarball yesterday, opened it and attempted to install
it. I am not green with regard to instal
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 02:24:54PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> mickeydog wrote:
> >is this the answer:
> >
> >
> http://www.forumsforyou.com/p/comp.graphics.apps.gimp/Where_Is__Add_Glow__and__Center_Layer__in_Gimp_2.x__1954.html
>
> That is a thead I created elsewhere on the same subject before I
mickeydog wrote:
is this the answer:
http://www.forumsforyou.com/p/comp.graphics.apps.gimp/Where_Is__Add_Glow__and__Center_Layer__in_Gimp_2.x__1954.html
That is a thead I created elsewhere on the same subject before I joined
this list. IIRC, the response involved uninstalling the SuSE RPM an
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
install gimp-perl
How? Is this another RPM? Or is it only available as a tarball? Where
do I get it?
Thanks,
Myke
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listin
Hi,
"Myke C. Subs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just joined this list. This is my first post to it.
>
> I have been a happy GIMPer since 2000 until this year.
>
> After Red Hat ditched me 2 years ago, I switched to Mandrake 8.2 and
> didn't like it. So this year I switched to SuSE 9.2 Pro
is this the answer:
http://www.forumsforyou.com/p/comp.graphics.apps.gimp/Where_Is__Add_Glow__and__Center_Layer__in_Gimp_2.x__1954.html
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 12:00 -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I've just joined this list. This is my first post to it.
>
> I have been a happy GIMP
Hello All,
I've just joined this list. This is my first post to it.
I have been a happy GIMPer since 2000 until this year.
After Red Hat ditched me 2 years ago, I switched to Mandrake 8.2 and
didn't like it. So this year I switched to SuSE 9.2 Pro and I like it a
*lot* - except for the fact
66 matches
Mail list logo
