removing the out-of-date Extension, and then allowing it to be rebuilt
at the next launch of the program?
Best regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [
tant way(s)?
Best regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
For urgen
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, matt barkdull wrote:
> >Beige G3 has 10/100... 9600 - maybe, probably not
>
> Neither has 10/100 built in. Just checked the Apple Spec database to
> be sure.
>
> This is a 300, but specs also show that the 366 only had 10BaseT.
Correct. In any case, we run a number of As
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Retrospect wrote:
> I had major problems with Retrospect & Beige G3 with Asante NICs &
> Asante drivers, even the latest ones.
We too had some simultaneous Asante card "crashes" on several different
flavors (and colors) of machines, only when they were connected to 7016
swit
r half duplex, because of limitations in the
Mac OS).
YMMV,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://list.working-dogs
leMaker Server 5 Students." So finally
to the question:
Must we change the AppleScript to explicitly state "FileMaker Server 5
Students," or will the supplied default work without modification?
Best regards,
Mark E. Ingram
Mark Ingram wrote:
> [A] "FileMaker Pro Server Toggle" AppleScript ... is included with
> Retrospect 4.3 [and] refers specifically to to FileMaker 3.0. The
> AppleScript itself, however, is structured as follows:
>
> tell application "FileMaker Pro Server&quo
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Philip Chonacky wrote:
> Funny, when I open it, I get:
> > tell application "FileMaker Pro" to «event FMPAFQUI»
> What application did you point your script to?
Because the FileMaker 5 server is currently under heavy user load, I have
not yet directed the script
ervers, Retrospect 4.3 remains in the
background during and after scripted backups. Is this new behavior,
which we can also expect on the FMP server?
Best regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
To subscrib
or similar. Retrospect 4.3 has been the *only* change. Is there
something about the new program that could cause this behavior?
Meanwhile, I think we'll try version 4.2 for tonight's backup.
Regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (a
taken about nine seconds at 100 Mbps with matched (in
this case full) duplex settings took about 1.5 *minutes* when one of the
devices was forced to half duplex. YMMV.
Regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Mark wrote:
> We upgraded an OS 8.6/ASIP 6.2 G4 to Retrospect 4.3, and for each of
> the past three mornings since the upgrade, the server has been found
> with ASIP in the foreground, and Retrospect in the background with the
> dialogue box saying, "Do y
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Mark wrote:
> We upgraded an OS 8.6/ASIP 6.2 G4 to Retrospect 4.3, and for each of
> the past three mornings since the upgrade, the server has been found
> with ASIP in the foreground, and Retrospect in the background with the
> dialogue box saying, "Do y
rformance: XX.X Mb/minute
with XX% compression," is there some rule-of-thumb value below which
shoeshining could be expected to occur on DDS-4 drives? Would a different
(albeit arbritrary) value perhaps apply to DDS-2 devices?
Thanks much,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (a
he program has begun the
scripted backup that had been aborted at Midnight due to the above issue.
Does this sound familiar to anyone here?
Regards,
Mark E. Ingram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Pam Lefkowitz wrote:
> I got an assertion check on a restore a couple weeks ago. Basically,
> the technotes told me to call tech support. :-)
Thanks, Pam. I did hear back privately from Dantz, and they are keeping
an eye on the situation to see if it reoccurs.
> For me, I q
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Irena Solomon wrote:
> This particular assert we are currently tracking and believe it to be
> ASIP Memory Management-related. Most users who have seen this error
> report that after restarting the assert does not reproduce.
Thanks for the quick reply, Irena. In our case, si
etter to have those
things on their own segments! =)
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Andrew Philipoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/02/00 11:43 AM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL P
Hi,
Just upgraded an old fileserver (7300) to OS9 and can't see the tape drive
(Sony SDT-9000 DDS3)... checked the cables, no other scsi devices, works
fine under OS 8.6 is this related to retrospect 4.2 or is there an OS
update somewhere?... any help or suggestions very appreciated!!
--
-
turn them off, you're amazed at the silence.
--
MARK HEWITT
Programmer / Max Multimedia London / 0171-288-6288 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:&l
ferences between AIT, AIT-1 and
AIT-2 as well. It's all in the PDF.
--
MARK HEWITT
Programmer / MAX Multimedia / London
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:<http://lis
toring from the same CD-RW discs on my personal
CD-RW drive and had no problems.
Mark.
-
Mark Siple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Senior Publishing Systems Engineer
The Columbus Dispatch
"I don't do .INI, .BAT, or .SYS files. I don't assign apps to files. I
don't configure per
x27;t realize that file had to get copied back &
forth each time they logged in.
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Malcolm McLeary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/28/00 07:47 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: <
a minimum when we
*really* have to do a restore.
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Hi I'm new to the list here and thought I'd ask a question that some of
you
here might have knowledge about.
Quick synopsis of what's going on and what the plan is and ask for any
advic
it's a harmless message though...
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Noah Eiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/14/00 02:46 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Rest
he tech
notes more often than I do. Didn't mean to be an alarmist... :-)
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Matthew Tevenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/14/00 03:42 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: retro-talk <[EM
databases get hosed, but I've always
been able to just copy the latest working version from the other hard
disk. I've never actually had to recover from a restrospect backup.
Unless there's a catastrophic HD failure, I'll probably never have to use
the retrospect backup of
ls like a U&G problem.
HTH a little,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
rcash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/19/00 03:51 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Crashing
Well, this isn't *exactly* germain but we've taken a lot of calls in the
past 6 months about the erroneous "file sharing could not be enabled"
message.
It seems to crop up mostly on OS9 computers running multiple users or
networked MM and on laptops when switching locations. Note that file
s
th retrospect. You can
schedule another AT command to restart the server after that. Goodbye
leaky NT server.
I know this doesn't directly answer your question but maybe it's a
start...
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
"Alex Lisak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
o deactivate the screen saver (to see if the backup worked),
and the script would start shortly after. Removing BlackWatch worked.
--
MARK HEWITT
Programmer / MAX Multimedia / London
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubsc
e it actually has to read tape.
hint, hint.
>>>Also, anybody have a solution for notification of failures? I've
been
toying with hacking up an applescript solution to my pager, but if
someone's
already done it... ;-)<<<
OK, that would be cooler still!
HTH,
Ma
it this way, but it seems to work...
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Eric Zylstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/04/00 05:27 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
them to
recycle and the storage set picks the right tape.
I have a feeling this isn't the *right* way to do it probably, it's just a
workaround thatwell worked.
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
Noah Eiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTE
A while back, I read Yamaha had released a beta firmware update that fixed
this drive's incompatibility with Retrospect. Does anyone have an update on
that beta's progress? Anyone having trouble after applying the beta?
Thanx. Mark.
-
Mark Siple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
AFAIK, you are correct. All these guys are OEMing Sony's mechanism into
their boxes. BTW, Seagate isn't making the Sidewinder200 anymore. The
reason we went with Seagate's box is because we've had very good
experiences with their tech support and service. And indeed they came
through in th
have an AT command run that restarts the server. And
when the server restarts, Faircom loads as a service.
Now whatever method you end up using to get fmp to stop, I can't stress
how important it is to test a restore after you do a backup. I don't know
what effect this would have on a
t;months before Newer.
We have had good luck with Sonnet cards also. My main home machine had
a Sonnet card and it always worked well. That machine is now running my
FileMaker Pro server without problems.
-- Mark
--
Mark Collien - Manager, Information Technology
National Center on Education a
7;s my understanding that retrospect
can backup the active registries of these os's so Regcopy isn't necessary
- you might want to test that though, I'm pretty sure, but :-)
HTH,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
"Amy R. Jaquish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
oops, sorry for the seemingly redundant post. I think I missed part of
this thread! :-)
"Amy R. Jaquish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/08/00 04:52 PM
Please respond to "retro-talk"
To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
:
was Mark Maytum/Pompy
received
by
Can anyone give me possible pitfalls in running an Adaptec Powerdomain
Ultra wide scsi card (68 pin) in a new Apple Mac G4 with Retrospect v4.2
please.
TIA
Mark Witrylak
Computer Support Team
Ysgol Seicoleg School of Pyschology
Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor
pak. I'm TRYING to run
it off an Apple Mac G4 (OS 9.0.4) but the G4 doesn't see the damn thing!!
What server type are you (looking to) running it from?
Mark Witrylak
Computer Support Team
Ysgol Seicoleg School of Pyschology
Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor
Can you tell me if this is the Ultra SCSI2 (50 pin) card on you G4, and IF
you remember, what the firmware revision was? And how you found out that
it was the SCSI card?
Please
Mark
>It took me a couple tries, but my problem turned out to be an old
>version of the firmware for the SCS
be inaccurate.
Internal consistency check failed:
assertion check at "elem.c-811"
Backup server stops with general error. This is now happening on TWO of my
Win98 clients - I have to forget them in order to run my server.
Thanks in anticipation
Mark Witrylak
Computer Su
I think as long as the AppleShare server is running when you do your backups, permissions get backed up automatically. If you ever have to restore an entire ASIP volume, following the Retrospect instructions (you do a second restore for privs.) works just fine.
Steve Maser <[EMAIL PROTEC
o manually assign an empty tape to a storage set. If you name an empty tape now, Retrospect still sees it as blank and will use it however it sees fit. Granted, that's a feature, not a bug. But it would also be a good feature to override that feature. :-)
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills
I believe if you have a storage set named "Bob" and you erase and name all your tapes in a magazine, "1-Bob"..."8-Bob, etc. (assuming an 8 tape mag) ANY other backup set assigned to that script will be able to use those empty named tapes. Only after they have data on them does retrospect really a
(server is 4.3 on OS8.6, clients are 4.2a/4.3)
Mark Witrylak
Computer Support Team
Ysgol Seicoleg School of Pyschology
Prifysgol Cymru, Bangor University of Wales, Bangor
Adeilad Brigantia The Brigantia Build
bearing in mind the ASIP Mac will be absolutely unchanged, will I be able to
continue my incremental backup as normal or will the data be marked as
modified? Does anyone have advise on how to minimise the risk of
modification?
Many thanks in advance,
Mark
--
Mark James ~ information technologis
backup solution for OS/2? Don't
care how "out there" it is. As always I'm interested in any helpful tips
or tricks.
TIA,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscri
Michael,
Try making a storage set for each tape you want to use in your backup
script. If your backup script is set to "full" or "recycle" (depending on
your version of retro) the backup script will overwrite the tape when it's
re-inserted.
Mark
MICHAEL PRUSSE
deferring
the backup (I hope!).
This problem normally doesn't repeat itself 2 nights in a row. But I'm
not sure why. Maybe they get restarted? Anyway, removing multiple users
is not an option for these macs.
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
matt barkdull <[EMAIL
titioned a rather large RAID with 'only' tape as backup! PLEASE RESPOND
TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mark James ~ information technologist
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ehsrealtime ~ 7 Soho Square ~ London W1V 6EH
t 020 7878 2600 ~ f 020 7544 4700 ~ www.ehsrealtime.com
___
sort I could rebuild the storage sets from retro on the W2K
box (can this even be done?) but that would probably take longer than I'd
care to wait. :-)
Can I do this?
TIA,
Mark Maytum
Pompanoosuc Mills Corporation
--
--
To subscribe
available and they
don't have drivers for many (most?) of the new drives that I have looked at
(that includes their driver updates).
Thanks and best wishes,
Mark
--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAI
y w/ no problem.
Simultaneously, I run another Retrospect on another NT4 server for
disk-based quickies. I've also tested this entire process on W2K Server and
Adv. Server, and it works great, even spanning Active Directory.
Happy Mark
---
This e-mail contains the thought and opinion of Mar
57 matches
Mail list logo
