On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 00:24 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey,
So I looked into this, and we bumped our requirement to Django 1.3.x
back in the 1.6 betas. So 1.6.0 and every release since has had a =
1.3 (and later 1.3.1 due to security fixes) dependency.
It was the RB 1.5 releases that
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 01:02 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
There's a couple bugs that snuck into 1.6.4, so we've fixed them up
and released 1.6.4.1.
See
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/02/28/review-board-1641-released/
for more info.
Packages are now available for
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 09:30 +0100, hatem ounis wrote:
Hey guys,
We just built an RPM for CentOS of RB-1.6.5 based on CentOS-5
mainstream RPM providing RB-1.5.6
We tested it on CentOS-5.6.
Here is the updated spec file and patches, so it would be nice if
someone test it, and give
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 03:22 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.6.5 is out. It has a couple bug fixes, but mainly fixes
installation issues now that Django 1.4 is out.
See
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/03/30/review-board-165-released/
for more info.
Can you point out
I thought it might be worth bumping this thread again, given Christian's
comments in the thread Focus and Priorities. I would like to hear some
thoughts on my suggested approach here.
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:51 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I just thought I might mention this email again
I'm getting the following error while trying to upgrade my 1.5.7 install
to the newer 1.6.5 package during 'rb-site upgrade'.
I am using django_evolution 0.6.7. This error is resulting in an outage
situation, so I could really use some help quickly :(
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 9, in module
...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=enFrom 14c57d21085537be0d71e3b061cfdfed3a2054c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:14:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Disable ez_setup when
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:01 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Maybe I'm getting mixed up between 1.6.x and 1.7. It could be that we
only added site in 1.6.
We can get that change into 1.6.x. I was hesitant to make too many
more changes to 1.6.x, but we'll be doing a larger 1.6.x release
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 13:34 -0700, TaoSun wrote:
Hi Christian,
I am still stuck with RB 1.5.7 on my new CenOs server. Our production
sever is running 1.5 on Gentoo and I'd like to move to CentOs 6.2 ga.
Seems everything works except adding screenshot. I have compared the
permission between
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 19:14 -0700, mark.har...@arcinnovations.co.nz
wrote:
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on Enterprise Linux version 5.4.
As part of the process, I understand that I need to install PySVN (I
tried locate pysvn and got nothing back). I navigated to the PySVN
project page
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 12:01 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
RB 1.5.x will not work with Django 1.4.
It's also a pretty ancient release, which won't receive any more
updates. The 1.6.x series would be a better bet.
I strongly recommend using the ReviewBoard 1.6.8 packages I build for
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:39 -0700, GreenCheese wrote:
I am getting following error message when I type EASY_INSTALL
If you're running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 or 6 (or one of their
clones such as CentOS or Scientific Linux), I recommend installing the
EPEL[1] repository and using the
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 12:15 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
So here's the current plan. 1.6.10 will be happening over the next few
days. I have a bug to fix with extensions and a couple changes to
still get in for 1.7, but I'll shoot for a beta this weekend. I'd like
to follow with an RC in
on improving
development process at Red Hat and among the upstream projects we
contribute to. I've been pushing Review Board at our upstream
communities fairly hard for the last couple years.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 12:36 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I'll do what I can to make that deadline. Please hound me about it as
it gets closer in case we slip :)
*hound*
Just wanted to remind you about the Fedora 18 alpha deadline on August
7th (which really means I have to
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 13:45 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
The security release wasn't so much a problem, but we had some
regressions I had to sort out due to the new optimizations in 1.6.10.
I started work toward the beta push again last night, and will be
doing more today. I intend to hit
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 01:49 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm happy to announce that we've pushed out the release of Review
Board 1.7 beta 1. There's many new and exciting things in this
release, but rather than repeat myself, I'll just link you to the news
post.
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 11:46 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
A 0.7.1 is being uploaded right now that should fix this.
What is pipeline.storage, and is it a new dependency I need to have in
on the build system?
Still getting:
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py install
--root
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the
dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
I can fix this in a couple hours, but I imagine that's not fully necessary on
fedora once you have a
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 15:56 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 12:31 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, the pipeline (django_pipeline) module. Guessing we left it out of the
dependency list for Djblets (though RB has it).
I can fix this in a couple hours, but I
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:18 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
There's a few things that it seems are broken with newer Pipelines. I
know for sure that 1.2.1 works. Any way you could just package that
for now? Looking into the remaining things, but there's some ugly
issue I'm not completely sure
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:54 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
This branch has what we need on the djblets side:
https://github.com/chipx86/djblets/tree/pipeline-fix
Unless there's just something messed up here, you should hit problems
with pipeline not finding files in the
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release, but
no, apparently not.
I'll keep poking at this and talk to the developer.
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds upgraded to django-pipeline along with the release
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:07 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 22:00 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:48 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Sorry man :( That's my life-lesson. I had thought our servers and
nightly builds
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:06 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
The problem you're hitting is that prior to a more recent-ish 1.6
release, we weren't hard-coding specific versions of the packages we
needed. We were saying XYZ or newer. Unfortunately, those packages
are no longer
On Wed 31 Oct 2012 10:01:51 PM EDT, Zhu Wayne wrote:
I am not sure why httpd still user Python 2.4 instead of 2.6? I have
to point /usr/bin/python - python2.6 instead of python2.4.
Linux wihadoopn302p.dev.ch3.s.com 2.6.18-308.13.1.el5 #1 SMP Thu Jul
26 05:45:09 EDT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
On 10/31/2012 02:53 PM, Zhu Wayne wrote:
I am using Python 2.4.3 and can import MySQLdb without any issue in the
shell.
$python -V
Python 2.4.3
$python
Python 2.4.3 (#1, Nov 3 2010, 12:52:40)
[GCC 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48)] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more
On 11/20/2012 05:32 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I'll be pushing out a 1.6.14 probably this week. We'll continue to
release 1.6.x releases for a little while after 1.7 is out.
I'm putting out an RC of 1.7 hopefully also this week.
One thing I wanted to check with you on before the
On Mon 26 Nov 2012 02:02:20 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yeah, we can add that support, but the blessjs you're referring to is unrelated to the
project. Our bless compiler service is really for lesscss.
Sure, you tell me which local compiler you're using and I'll make sure
that one is
On Mon 26 Nov 2012 02:40:24 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
Should be less from http://lesscss.org/
I remember we talked before about the node.js challenges surrounding
that. Did you guys figure out a solution to that?
I took over the packaging of Node.js. It's currently awaiting
On Wed 12 Dec 2012 03:30:09 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
If you have lessc locally, this will stop happening. Make sure you can run that
on the command line. I don't know if lessjs is something else or not.
The final 1.7 release doesn't use bless anymore, so it'll require lessc for
On Thu 13 Dec 2012 12:49:22 PM EST, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Okay, it was a little rocky, but I managed to update my RB server. I
haven't poked it really hard yet, but the biggest issue I was having
(user can't join groups) seems fixed (thank you!). Rearranging columns
in the dashboard also now
.
Happy holidays!
Christian
On Dec 19, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Stephen Gallagher
ste...@gallagherhome.com javascript: wrote:
On Wed 19 Dec 2012 05:04:39 AM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
To those of you who upgraded to 1.7.0 and hit some upgrade
problems
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 11:47:06 AM EST, p...@talk21.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
After running rb-site install and visiting the website, I get errors
about a couple of directories not being writeable. The web page
helpfully suggests a couple of chmod -R commands. However on Fedora
the SELinux profile
On Mon 07 Jan 2013 12:20:15 PM EST, Erik Putrycz wrote:
Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found
bitnami review board but they only have 1.6
Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install?
Would CentOS 6.3 work?
CentOS 6.x doesn't yet have an
On Mon 07 Jan 2013 02:02:58 PM EST, Erik Putrycz wrote:
I don't think any type of hosting will work for us because our
subversion repository access is very restricted.
I had a quick look at OpenShift but it seems that you can only deploy
packages on a remote server.
Btw, how long do you think
On 01/04/2013 04:07 AM, p...@talk21.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
The following AVC denied errors occur:
1) named_connect to port 11211 (memcached)
type=AVC msg=audit(1357289094.993:338): avc: denied { name_connect }
for pid=1668 comm=httpd dest=11211
scontext=system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
On 01/04/2013 04:30 AM, p...@talk21.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Another SELinux error I missed:
3) write to data directory
Occurs when user tries to login.
type=AVC msg=audit(1357290519.860:433): avc: denied { write } for
pid=1666 comm=httpd name=data dev=dm-1 ino=1884
On 01/04/2013 04:34 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
If we can do anything intelligent in rb-site to handle this, I'll
happily take a patch for it. It'd have to be conditional on SELinux
actually being on there, though.
Yeah, the conditional should be easy. libsemanage-python can check
whether
On 01/16/2013 02:53 AM, Gav Main wrote:
Hi Christian,
I appreciate you replying so quickly. We have the RH supplied version
installed (python-ldap-2.3.10-1.el6.x86_64).
To give you a bit more information. We are looking to move from
ReviewBoard 1.6.5 - 1.6.15. I have setup a lab instance
*From:* p...@talk21.com p...@talk21.com
*To:* Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
*Cc:* chip...@chipx86.com chip...@chipx86.com; Christian
Hammond chip...@gmail.com; reviewboard@googlegroups.com
reviewboard@googlegroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, 8 January 2013, 12:42
On 01/17/2013 01:58 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
Review Board 1.7.2 is out. Lots of bug fixes and a few new features. See
the news post and release notes for more info.
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/16/review-board-1-7-2-released/
We'll have a new RBTools out
On 01/28/2013 03:28 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.7.3 is released! This is mostly a bug-fix release, with a
new feature for optionally e-mailing when review requests are closed,
and some compatibility improvements.
Several of the bug fixes in this release were fixed by our new
On 01/31/2013 01:08 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
Review Board 1.7.4 is out. It fixes a couple problems with 1.7.3 that
users of IE and developers generating patches on Windows have hit. It's
a pretty small release, but if you have 1.7.3 installed, you should upgrade.
On 02/06/2013 05:38 PM, karamsing...@gmail.com wrote:
Nevermind. I have hacked the code to make the check for this. Case closed.
On Monday, February 4, 2013 1:07:55 PM UTC-8, karams...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have review board 1.74 working on Mac OS X (Mountain Lion). I am able
to
On 02/07/2013 02:37 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
Review Board 1.7.5 is out. It fixes a few, mostly small problems people
have hit, and a major compatibility change with the newly released
django-pipeline 1.3.
If you installed 1.7.4 in the past week, you may have had a crash
On Tue 12 Feb 2013 06:10:16 AM EST, kapila narang wrote:
thanks yes i tried everything.
Finally it has worked not trying my company authentication credentials
Compatible version which worked is python-ldap-2.3.13
In general, running Review Board on RHEL/CentOS 5 is not a good idea.
The
On Sun 16 Dec 2012 01:28:46 PM EST, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
...
So I was thinking more about this, and came up with a vision how I
think the UI would work best.
The basic idea is to add a new option to diff display, 'view as patch
series'. The important parts are a) not available if a
The OpenLMI developers discovered a bug[1] today related to whitespace
display in the diff viewer. Specifically, whitespace changes are not
being shown, regardless of the setting of Hide Extra Whitespace or
Hide Whitespace changes toggles.
This is a pretty serious regression, particularly when
On 03/25/2013 05:04 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Whitespace for indentation has never been shown for most files,
regardless of that setting. That's just due to how we've always
generated diffs.
During diff generation, indentation changes are ignored. The intent was
to prevent
After much blood, sweat and tears, I have finally managed to land
ReviewBoard 1.7.6 in the EPEL 6 add-on repository for Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 6 (and its clones). The update should filter out to the
[epel-testing] mirrors in the next 24-48 hours. Please test carefully
and provide feedback if
On 04/18/2013 01:46 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi James,
Generally speaking, you should never install from a tarball. It requires
a bunch of additional build dependencies you should not deal with.
They're really for our usage. Instead, you should get the eggs only.
There's a lot of
Congrats on your first commit to Review Board, Jeff. You are exactly the
sort of user that OSS projects love to attract. My SSSD project would
likely still be a buggy mess if not for your contributions.
I'll try and get Fedora and EPEL packages out today for 1.7.7.1.
On Sunday, April 21, 2013,
On Sun 21 Apr 2013 05:05:19 PM EDT, Christian Hammond wrote:
We had a regression when creating new site installations. While
unfortunate, it gave us the opportunity for a cool version number. So
it all works out in the end.
Review Board 1.7.7.1 is out. If you already have a working site, then
On 04/23/2013 08:29 AM, Rahul Patil wrote:
Hi Christian,
Attempted to upgrade ReviewBoard to 1.7.7.1 and it messed up.
Got this error when I hit the URL to RB site :
Something broke! (Error 500)
It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is either
a bug in Review
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'step...@gallagherhome.com'); wrote:
On 04/23/2013 08:29 AM, Rahul Patil wrote:
Hi Christian,
Attempted to upgrade ReviewBoard
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ian,
We have this mostly ironed out, but it may not become part of the standard
Review Board install.
We're putting together a for-pay add-on package for Review Board to
improve support in enterprises. Things like enhanced
On 05/08/2013 02:44 PM, Yugesh Kambham wrote:
Hi,
I finished setting up review board and all configurations and when i try
to access the website it threw me an internal error 500. I checked the
log files and i found there is some issue with loading python modules. I
am doing installtion on
On 05/16/2013 02:38 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
We just set up a new Review Board announcements mailing list. Unlike
this list, it's not a discussion forum, but rather a place where we can
keep you updated on what's going on with Review Board.
The new list covers product
On 05/21/2013 12:03 PM, Justin O'Doherty wrote:
I've installed the following on RedHat
ReviewBoard 1.6.16
Apache 2.4.4
Python 2.7.4
Django 1.3.7
The issue I'm having is that when I try to request a page from
Reviewboard, I get a 403 Forbidden response.
# curl
On 05/22/2013 04:01 AM, Justin O'Doherty wrote:
# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 (mockbu...@hs20-bc2-4.build.redhat.com
mailto:mockbu...@hs20-bc2-4.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 4.1.2
20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-52)) #1 SMP Wed Mar 28 01:54:56 EDT 2012
Architecture: x86_64
On 05/30/2013 11:42 AM, Robert Burkhall wrote:
Hi,
I can't seem to get ReviewBoard to install on any CentOS 6.4
installation i've tried, What's going on here?
You will have a much easier time installing on CentOS 6.4 by using the
EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) yum repository
On 05/30/2013 02:34 PM, Robert Burkhall wrote:
I'm required to utilized authorized repo's to acquire any opensource
tools.
I'd suggest getting EPEL added to that list, at least in comparison to
PyPI. Anyone can push a package to PyPI. Getting a package into EPEL
requires a lot more effort
On 05/30/2013 04:20 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
RBTools 0.5.1 is out. It contains a number of bug fixes, feature
enhancements, and API changes.
The bulk of the release are bug fixes. Thanks to everyone who has come
to us with bug reports sine the 0.5.0 release. We believe
On 06/03/2013 03:14 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.7.8 is out, and has a number of new features, bug fixes,
and performance enhancements. Too much to list, in fact. I'm just going
to direct you to the news post.
On Mon 03 Jun 2013 08:44:03 AM EDT, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:14 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Also, as you'll notice, we have a whole new site! Let us know if you
have any trouble with it.
I noticed a couple things on the site while browsing through it:
One more thing
On 06/03/2013 08:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:14 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.7.8 is out, and has a number of new features, bug fixes,
and performance enhancements. Too much to list, in fact. I'm just going
to direct you to the news post.
http
On 06/03/2013 02:17 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:52, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Mon 03 Jun 2013 08:44:03 AM EDT, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/03/2013 03:14 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Also, as you'll notice, we have a whole new site! Let us
On 06/03/2013 03:41 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
1.7.9 is out, with fixes to installation issues people have hit and
reported (thanks!). It also adds API for getting the Blocks/Depends On
fields for a Review Request resource. Previously, this was only
available in the draft.
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013, pfee wrote:
Hi Christian, Stephen,
While testing Stephen's Fedora packages, on a F18 machine I upgraded from
1.7.7.1 to 1.7.9. Following the upgrade, I expected visiting the site's
/dashboard URL would have told me to run rb-site upgrade. Instead I got
a 500
On 06/04/2013 05:47 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Tuesday, June 4, 2013, pfee wrote:
Hi Christian, Stephen,
While testing Stephen's Fedora packages, on a F18 machine
On 06/04/2013 09:15 AM, victoria wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 06/04/2013 05:47 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:44 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step
On 06/04/2013 09:19 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/04/2013 09:15 AM, victoria wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 06/04/2013 05:47 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 2:44 AM
I noticed recently that rb-site doesn't handle ~ in the site path either,
but I haven't gotten around to filing a bug on it.
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013, Daniel Kan wrote:
New user to ReviewBoard here. Great tool with an intuitive interface,
thanks for your efforts! Recently, one of my users was
On 06/25/2013 07:56 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just put out a release of Review Board 1.7.11. It's a minor release
that fixes Python 2.5 compatibility and a small visual bug with HTML
entities on IE9.
For those still running on Python 2.5, I highly recommend upgrading to
On 07/28/2013 06:02 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
We have a couple new releases tonight. Review Board 1.6.18 and 1.7.12
focus on tightening security, and giving extension writers a couple new
abilities to make their lives easier.
It's late here, so I'm going to direct you to
On 07/31/2013 12:54 PM, ReviewBoard user wrote:
Hello,
I have a very specific user that can't receive emails via ReviewBoard
when creating requests or updates to the request. I checked this against
the database, and he is an active user with the correct email.
I'm attempting to follow the
On 08/02/2013 01:49 PM, Kedar Gangal wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to try out Review Board using the Review Board Demo server. I
can login with guest/guest, but I was wondering if there is a way I can
create a user account that is not visible to other users so that I can
create and try out reviews
On 08/15/2013 12:34 PM, Ariadne Castilho wrote:
Hi,
I have issues with space and I need to remove Reviewboard from one Linux
VM to install in another one. I couldn't find how to remove it, is it
possible?
Did you install it with the EPEL packages? If so, you can use 'yum
remove
On 08/15/2013 06:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
Review Board 1.7.13 is released. The big highlights are Beanstalk
(http://beanstalkapp.com) and Bitbucket Git support, but there's a
handful of other fixes and improvements as well.
See
On 08/20/2013 09:42 AM, Michaela Newell wrote:
I am attempting to setup LDAP for the first time.
The GUI login page is stating that:
Log in with your standard username and password
There's no need to register a new account. Your standard username and
password should work fine.
On 08/20/2013 09:46 AM, Michaela Newell wrote:
I am attempting to set-up emails. I have all three options selected and
a valid smtp server. When I add a new user the logs show nothing but the
email does not get sent. When I add a new review request I get this in
the log:
- Error sending
, 20 August 2013 14:48:30 UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/20/2013 09:46 AM, Michaela Newell wrote:
I am attempting to set-up emails. I have all three options
selected and
a valid smtp server. When I add a new user the logs show nothing
but the
email does not get
On 08/21/2013 04:41 AM, xuh...@gmail.com wrote:
*it seems many people meet same problem, but don't find a good solution*
it seems many people meet that problem, but can't find a good solution
Manual server updates required
A recent upgrade requires manual updates to be made
On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-).
(Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated
optparse... now that's interesting...)
optparse is deprecated, not removed. It's not going to see any
On 08/23/2013 03:32 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python
Hmm, would you mind filing this as a bug on bugzilla.redhat.com? Looks like
a packaging issue rather than a ReviewBoard bug.
I'm on vacation until the 23rd, but I'll look into it when I get back.
In the meantime, what happens if you do:
yum clean all
yum install python-docutils
On Wednesday,
On 09/11/2013 01:31 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-09-11 11:23, Mark Addleman wrote:
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL. I have installed the EPEL
repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns
Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
Requires:
On 09/15/2013 04:01 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
Review Board 1.7.14 is out. As promised, it updates to the latest
security release for Django, and has a handful of other bug fixes,
including a small security fix affecting some users using private groups
and repositories in the
On 10/10/2013 06:50 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We just put out a couple new security releases. These address some
vulnerabilities we found while developing a new security test suite that
allows users to see information on review requests they shouldn't have
access to. This
On 10/11/2013 06:44 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
Last night's releases were a bit bumpier than we like, due to a
regression in Djblets, in Review Board, and in a third-party tool we
used for packaging. All in all, comedy of errors, and hopefully it
didn't bite too many people.
On 10/16/2013 03:42 AM, Anant Sharma wrote:
Hi,
After installing all the dependencies and ReviewBoard using yum, now I
am not able to proceed, getting below error
# rb-site install /var/www/reviews.gps.com
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/rb-site, line 5, in module
On 10/16/2013 07:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/16/2013 03:42 AM, Anant Sharma wrote:
Hi,
After installing all the dependencies and ReviewBoard using yum, now I
am not able to proceed, getting below error
# rb-site install /var/www/reviews.gps.com
Traceback (most recent call last
On 10/16/2013 07:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/16/2013 07:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/16/2013 03:42 AM, Anant Sharma wrote:
Hi,
After installing all the dependencies and ReviewBoard using yum, now I
am not able to proceed, getting below error
# rb-site install /var/www
On 10/18/2013 10:41 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-10-18 01:45, Kim Gräsman wrote:
I might try to come up with a patch, but I haven't really thought
about user experience. A new button seems a little brutal.
If you've thought about this before, have you come up with any ideas
for how
On 10/24/2013 03:11 AM, David Trowbridge wrote:
Bruno,
The current releases do not support internationalization. Our
in-progress 2.0 release does, but noone has yet done a pt_BR
localization. If you and your colleagues would be willing to help us
with the translation, we'd be thrilled to
On 11/04/2013 01:28 PM, Adrien Rochereau wrote:
Hi, I did an install two weeks ago on a centos 5.4 without any issues,
This week, trying to do the same thing on RHEL 5.4 and yum kept
returining not found, if you go to the package browser on fedora's
website, you cannot find RB anymore under
On 11/05/2013 11:16 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We just put out two new releases, 1.6.21 and 1.7.17. These fix a couple
security vulnerabilities, so please upgrade.
Along with this, 1.7.17 fixes several bugs and adds some new features.
It's a pretty good release, and even
On 11/06/2013 05:47 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
There's a broken version of jsmin that got upgraded again on one of the
build environments... I'll put out a new release.
Just as an FYI, the Fedora and EPEL packages of 1.7.17 are not affected
by this, as we have been patching out the jsmin
101 - 200 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
