I have a explanation of NDE experiences that is incomplete because it is
based on evolution, and the evolution of a trait rarely obey a single cause
not even a set of causes , because natural selection is holistic. Although
some of these causes may be the main ones in the evolution of a certain
tra
Even for materialists: why when the brain is in stress conditions do appear
vivid hallucinations that probably need a high dose of energy instead of
seeing for example a fixed image with "malfunction, we are on it. please
relax" ???
What I know is that there are a growing number of effects in hum
I mean:
ultimately the aestetic pleasure of Math derives from the natural impulse
to search for efficient algoritms useful for deduction
2013/3/25 Alberto G. Corona
> I don´t know what Math is.
>
> If math is all that is free from contradictions and can be expressed using
> the
point
that differences natural theology from mathematical theology)
Religión is more a form of organization around an admitted theology.
2013/3/24 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 22 Mar 2013, at 13:06, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> These beliefs in robotic religión has some reasons behind or
I suspect that this impossibility is because math uses concept of a
model, while truth refers to the match of facts of the model with facts of
the reality . Or at least to facts of a metamodel outside of the model.
That is AFAIK the Tarsky idea.
For example, "All men are mortal is true" . Here s
I don´t know what Math is.
If math is all that is free from contradictions and can be expressed using
the language of mathematics, then any description at any level can be math.
For example the set of positions and speeds of the particles of a piece of
dirt.
That description has nothing pure to s
; > On 3/22/2013 6:41 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 22.03.2013 13:41 Richard Ruquist said the following:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013
These inmanentist religions (eartly utopianism) it is clear that substitute
God by Man (upper case). A divinized man . This has the most evident form
of personality cult to the chosen ones that have the knowledge and/or are
at the control of the transformation process, that in the modernity is
cal
the
modern uthopias, and share the same basic impulses.
So this apocaliptic AI is one more scientist wave in this vast historical
process. Almost every scientific discipline has promised a kind of
salvation for himself.
2013/3/22 Evgenii Rudnyi
> On 22.03.2013 15:31 Alberto G. Corona said
This extract from Chesterton has little sense without what precedes and
follows.
2013/3/16 Craig Weinberg
> "For we must remember that the materialist philosophy (whether true or
>> not) is certainly much more limiting than any religion. In one sense, of
>> course, all intelligent ideas are na
I a previous discussion in this list ("robotic truth") I argue that a
robot in a competitive environment has to develop (or be programmed
for) all the elements of religión and beliefs to cooperate and survive.
2013/3/22 Evgenii Rudnyi
> On 22.03.2013 13:47 Stephen P. King said the following
These beliefs in robotic religión has some reasons behind or it is simply
wishful thinking?
2013/3/22 Evgenii Rudnyi
> Quotes from Robert Geraci, Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics,
> Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality
>
> p. 133 "Ray Kurzweil believes that intelligent mach
No.
What means "truth value" of something? in which range of phenomena? in all
phenomena applicable? how you can test all phenomena applicable to a
theory? you can't. The only thing that you can do is to test a particular
prediction that the theory predict that may never happen (Popperian
falsabil
Again the shorcomings of nominamism/positivism. The greeks would laugh at
these questions. It can be explained if we abandon the monomaniatic
reductionistic physicalism and think in terms of just what we are: rational
beings:
I think that the notion of "lost control of something" in an intelligent
2013/3/8 Craig Weinberg
>
>
> On Friday, March 8, 2013 7:41:23 AM UTC-5, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
>>
>> That may be not enough. suppose that you are starving, and you receive in
>> your phone a message describing where is the next source of water but
>> somehow the description is interspersed in t
Let´s say that what we call "information" is an extended form of sensory
input. What makes this input "information" is the usability of this input
for reducing the internal entropy of the receiver or increase the internal
order. The receiver can be a machine, a cell, a person or a society for
examp
2013/2/21 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 22:38, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> if comp and the null hypothesis (everithing exist) is accepted, then a
> infinity of copies of you are now being kicked by a wild horse while being
> eaten by bugs in an ocean of acid.
>
if comp and the null hypothesis (everithing exist) is accepted, then a
infinity of copies of you are now being kicked by a wild horse while being
eaten by bugs in an ocean of acid. So it does not matter what just a single
copy of you is doing whatever ;)
2013/2/13 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 13 Feb 20
Almost the same sensations provoked by a stroke:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTrJqmKoveU
There is nothing in LSD or any other psychodelical drugs, except the
impairement fo the pre-conscious control of what arrives to the conscious
produced by the (different modules of the) brain, That is a cl
detoxify fast enough.
2013/2/8 Alberto G. Corona
> Some initial comments, because I´m very interested on these alterations of
> conscience. The rest of my comments will appear along the conversation:
>
> I´m persuaded, by very simple evolutionary analysis that plants
> pr
list=PLyXtpSZUDSjzBluIm4CL5Dbf4F65B0t24.com/secrets-of-the-mind
2013/2/8 Alberto G. Corona
> Some initial comments, because I´m very interested on these alterations of
> conscience. The rest of my comments will appear along the conversation:
>
> I´m persuaded, by very simple evolutionary analysis that p
Some initial comments, because I´m very interested on these alterations of
conscience. The rest of my comments will appear along the conversation:
I´m persuaded, by very simple evolutionary analysis that plants
produced whatever chemical substance that stops from eating them. this is
their only me
2013/2/6 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 05 Feb 2013, at 11:19, Simon Forman wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 4, 2013 12:22:53 PM UTC-8, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, February 4, 2013 3:09:16 PM UTC-5, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
>>
>>
>>> but there is a self reference when we try to imagine how th
2013/2/6 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 06 Feb 2013, at 10:22, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2013/2/6 Stephen P. King
>
>> On 2/5/2013 3:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/5 Stephen P. King
>>
>>> Hi,
>
Another irritating attempt to initiate an of topic discussion. This time
the irritation was intended.
Please
2013/2/6 John Clark
> In his book Summa Theologica that prototypical theologian Saint Thomas
> Aquinas speculated on what heaven would be like, Just as santaklausologians
> specula
2013/2/5 Roger Clough
> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> Your concept is incomplete, because geometry is what Plato called forms,
> which he gave the Greek name of ideas. So you have a thought without a
> thinker.
>
>
>
Yes, the greeks did not conceive an empty space without fo
2013/2/6 Stephen P. King
> On 2/5/2013 3:27 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2013/2/5 Stephen P. King
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the question in a 3p sense is to
>> make it meaningless.
>>
>>
>>
2013/2/5 Stephen P. King
> Hi,
>
> ISTM that purpose is a 1p, so to ask the question in a 3p sense is to
> make it meaningless.
>
>
> That´s it.
But to insist into make the question in 3p may force the introduction of
an implicit 1p that contemplate the 3p, that is, a metamind , with a
m
I doubt that meaning, existence, creation, purpose makes sense when
applied to the mathematical nature of the external reality. I think that
these concepts only makes sense when though by a mind. So either we reject
these concepts when thinking about the universe (and this makes reasoning
almost i
I think that Roger said nothing agains Jews. simply, ethnic personal
tastes are not a topic for this group.
2013/2/4 freqflyer07281972
> Is there a way Roger can be banned for a comment like that? Or should the
> moderators/admins of this list simply change it to the 'Everything-Nazi
> List'?
I think that geometry is a form of accelerated calculation and presentation
of distances and angles by/in the mind, of the external mathematical
reality.
Within this mental geometrical representation, we locate the rest of the
elements of the mathematical reality that are relevant for survival, t
time, his 3d space, his macroscopical laws, is a product
of the mind when he contemplate the mathematical structure from inside.
2013/2/3 Roger Clough
> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> My understanding is that the block universe is the physical universe,
> so it does not include the w
rmitted in existence (And I´m
saying a lot), then we still can think, that the block universes is made of
things that exist, that we observe and things that don´t exist. It depends
on the notion of existence.
2013/2/2 Richard Ruquist
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alberto G.
Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
>
>
> - Receiving the following content -
> *From:* Alberto G. Corona
> *Receiver:* everything-list
> *Time:* 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
> *Subject:* Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
>
>
I do think that a block universe can contain minds in a certain way. The
objections against that are based in the absence of time, but space(3D
geometry) and time can and should be a product of the machinery of the
mind, in the kantian sense. But while in Kant things in themselves are
unreachable,
Hi
2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist
>
> It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
> evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
> be strongly affected by biological consciousness
>
> But then, what is the anthropic principle about?
>
>
> > --
> > Stathis P
2013/1/30 Roger Clough
> Hi Bruno Marchal,
>
> When I read the Bible, it is a subjective act,
> but not my own subjective act alonw, it is
> contained in the subjectivity of the Holy Spirit.
>
>
I´m afraid that when the bible and the Holy Spirit is put away by more
radical movements of a tradit
2013/1/30 meekerdb
> On 1/29/2013 7:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27 Jan 2013, at 19:53, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>
>> Bruno,
>>> You sill say interesting things even in a thread that has fallen deep
>>> in the boring hole of Reductio
A great post Stephen thanks
Well, in fact what the post says is that the ones that sucks are the
logical positivists (and their dwarfs, the scientists), who took over the
power in Modernland.
I take this phrase, which IMHO describes very well what is inside of what
"In fact, the opposite is tru
of reason: it can see its own limitations.
>
> Machines are born with a form of necessary faith and necessary intuition.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
> Faith opens the inner eye, which science wants to blind.
> So it is said that with faith, you have everything, without faith
> you h
Dear Bruno,
I can not agree with you. neither with anyone that contemplate a
minimalistic extract of the ideas of the past from the point of view and
the knowledge (and ignorance) of the present. Natural theology and the
conquest of nature has been ever a part of Christianity not because that
was
Hi Telmo.
Group selection It is no longer controversial. Naive group selection do not
work, but selection between groups where internal deletereous behaviours
are repressed to a certan level (but never eliminated) does work. The
theory is called multilevel selection. where selection operates at a
not extend this, to avoid to mention the G-world and induce
another rant by Pavlovian conditioning).
2013/1/25 Roger Clough
> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> Luther wasn't a rationalist, and so contributed nothing to modern science.
>
>
>
> - Receiving the following conte
2013/1/24 meekerdb
> On 1/24/2013 9:41 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> In fact it is just the opposite: the position of Luther, like the one of
>> Ocham or Duns Scoto, which were strongly anti-reason, created the modern
>> science and were precursors of the most rad
killed by the scientific
socialists. (or the 5+30 millions killed by the modern eugenesists).
The selection of stories in a biased way is a proof of nothing but the own
prejudices.
2013/1/24 meekerdb
>
>
> On 1/24/2013 9:12 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> All these things are part
In fact it is just the opposite: the position of Luther, like the one of
Ocham or Duns Scoto, which were strongly anti-reason, created the modern
science and were precursors of the most radical forms of Positivism.
Why? It is simple to understand: The three of them were against the use of
reason
All these things are part of the myths of modernity. The reality is quite
different. The idea that the medievals though that the earth was flat is
larguely a myth, as true as the fact that now a fair amount of the people
in the world believe that Man has not been in the Moon. Inquisition, for
examp
I though that, this was not a site for enhancing the self esteem of
self-proclaimed rationalists neither an insult-you-an-infidel theraphy
group.
2013/1/24 John Clark
> I sincerely hope that nobody believes I'm picking on Catholics because
> Protestant "thinking" is every bit as brain dead dumb
> human population is only possible because of fossil fuel energy. If we
> don't find an alternative, we will eventually face a mass extinction event.
> I'm not sure such an alternative exists, but maybe I'll be proven wrong (at
> least for my 1p) by MWI and QS.
>
>
&g
u have been surpassed.
Come on Brent
> Brent
>
>
> On 1/17/2013 2:57 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> Count me as an heretic denialist of the ecological Apocalipsis. The
> Michael Mann hockey stick is a fraud as you can verify in the mails leaked
> in the Climate Research Un
relativistic mathematics lacks a corresponding qualia of
the mind that make them intuitive and "real". They are efective and
predictive, but we can not make it apparent and intuitive in our reality.
2013/1/16 Alberto G. Corona
> This is the best introduction to quantum mechanics
Oh, two planet-saviors.
I´m more simpatetic to the "make French chess legal in america" movement.
Waiting for the next paranoia
2013/1/16 meekerdb
> e is great uncertainty about the problem. Of course they are not going to
> do anything about a problem they are
--
Alberto.
--
You
This is the best introduction to quantum mechanics:
https://www.google.es/search?q=susskind+quantum+mechanics&aq=f&oq=susskind+quantum+mechanics&aqs=chrome.0.57j0l3.11316&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
disclaimer: I have not seen it. but I saw some other lectures of this
series "the theoretical minim
I have to say that in the countries where lobbies are not permitted, they
are stronger and operate without the voter knowledge, so they have much
more freedom for corruption.
Prohibition by law is not a magic way to make things dissapear.
Unless omniscient, incapable of doing evil inspectors revi
democatic principle becomes a dogma an a source of wishdom.
so the democratic decissions can not go wrong. Many people says: The people
can not go wrong!!
economy and simplicity homogeneity principle
2013/1/16 Stephen P. King
> On 1/15/2013 9:13 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> &#
'that there is something fundamental that has particular properties is
unscientific dogma'.
Then everything is unscientific. because no human knowledge can be
expressed without unproven premises at the bottom.
Dogmas are not axioms neither premises, neither assumption, but the latter
tend to bec
Neither the state neither the market can build a society. It a question of
something more, that has a fundamental ingredient: the contact with
reality. When a person believe that receiving from the taxpayer two three
four times the market price for his solar electricity, and still think that
he i
You are californian its'nt?
2013/1/14 Platonist Guitar Cowboy
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> THe problem with solar energy is that it is strongly subsidized.
>>
>
> Yes, but this is lessening. Protectionism is crumbling.
THe problem with solar energy is that it is strongly subsidized. Instead of
you being stolen by "monopolistic" energy companies, you can steal the
taxpayer thank to state planning.
Most solar panels are installed because they receive subsidies by KW. As a
logical consequience a boost in production
since the mind
or in your case consciousness is the selector of existence. n your case, I
think that consciousness would "cause-back" Arithmetic and computation:*
Math<-> Computation<-> Mind -> Geometry -> Space -> Matter
2013/1/13 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 12 Jan
Dear Bruno:
- As I tried to show in robotic Truth, religion is a neccesity for the
operation of social beings.
For all machines, actually. Even when isolated. the "robotic truth" can be
> approached by introspection when the machine complexity is above the Löbian
> threshold.
>
>
> That´s absolu
Space and time may be only on the mind in the Kantian sense. I don´t find
that space must be independent of the mind. space and time may be the way
we perceive a space-time manifold which is pure mathematic and nothing
else. Maybe we can see space out there and we can think on geometry in a
spat
Perhaps we must worship Everett. Maybe he is with Einstein in a
superdimensional throne of quarks. Aleluya.
2013/1/10 John Clark
> Perhaps the Quantum Suicide experiment has already been performed and on a
> global scale. After Hugh Everett developed the many Worlds interpretation
> in his doct
I meant:
That´s why PROTECTION FROM bloody offenses demand blood as sacrifice
2013/1/10 Alberto G. Corona
> That´s why bloody offenses demand blood as sacrifice
--
Alberto.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" grou
It would say that they worship, and worship very hard. But his worship does
adopt different forms. All of them primitive, since their impulses are not
moderated by an assumption of tradition, so they lack the knowledge of best
practices due to previous failures. It is necessary to take into account
2013/1/8 Richard Ruquist
> At the most basic level reality is a discrete digital particle arithmetic
> with no need for further calculations in a block universe.
>
> Then it is indistinguishable from a contiuous or discrete mathematical
manifold of some kind. This manifold is anthropically select
it is perfectly possible to accept natural selection with all the
implication in genetics without being a materialist.
The materialism is a superfluous ideological substrate. Sheldrake is right
about this critic of materialism. I´m not materialist, and I accept Natural
selection. Materialism is
se NS is how we, as temporal
beings perceive the very long term coherence between the mind and the
anthropicallly selected mathematical reality
2013/1/6 Alberto G. Corona
> The expression "Socila construction of reality" is an expression that hold
> any kind or relativism. This is
I still don't know if Roger refer to the ,modern materialistic state or my
initial paragraph about human nature.
I do not know how this nominalism-materialism has derived in a "hole" such
is Fascism. Fascism is a political term, not a philosophical term. To stop
a discussion because something in h
limitation in our knowledge and the flawed nature of
our communications have moral, epistemological and in general philosophical
implications.
2013/1/6 meekerdb
> On 1/6/2013 12:42 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> I read some workd of Gintis,. but the experimental game theorists
I read some workd of Gintis,. but the experimental game theorists give up
when things get complicated. The dynamic of groups stability and
cooperation and their mechanisms is an field which has not even started.
They do not study the vital role of public cult and rites, for example that
are critica
Your robot do not have time to know the true truth. He would not speculate
on the nature of his programmer, or why he is here. At least until the
problems of survival are solved by means of a stable collaboration. Even
so, he never could have the opportunity to know the programmer. He don´t
know th
A greath truth. Every human knowledge has also social consequiences. When I
say "A". I don´t only say "A is true". I say also that because A is true
and you must accept it because a set of my socially reputated fellows of me
did something to affirm it, you must believe it, and, more important, I
de
survival, not accuracy.
2012/12/18 meekerdb
> On 12/18/2012 8:05 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I mean
>> a robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve problems.
>> These robots must repair
2012/12/18 Alberto G. Corona
> It just want te people to argue about what must be true for these robots.
> I suppose that the truth about fabrication of pieces are know and accepted
> by all, so the only remaining things to communicate and hold as trur are
> the ones related with
with truths about other robots or groups of robots.
2012/12/18 Roger Clough
> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>
> I'd rather just take a poll.
> I feel more comfortable with data.
>
> [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
> 12/18/2012
> "Forever is a long time, espe
Suppose that you are in charge of the software of a social robot. I mean a
robot that live with other robots that collaborate to solve problems. These
robots must repair themselves, with pieces that are located in the field.
these pieces are scarce or they are not for free, and some groups of robot
ve one. Accept conservatism and be
happy ;). Just a joke.
Craig
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2012/12/13 Craig Weinberg
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:43:59 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Alberto G. Co
, 2012 10:43:59 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alberto G. Corona
>>
>> It's much simpler than that, I think.
>> Progressives hate everything resembles anything
>> held to be good, beautiful, or true.
>>
>
> Then your thoughts are simple-mi
You said it:
."...in part because it (evolution) carried a sense of "progress" not found
in Darwin's idea"
Evolution is descriptive, is the fact. natural selection is the theory that
explain it. A scientific theory impose constraints with what may and may
not happen. For example, child caring and
Dear Craig,
You have much to learn about evolution. there have been a lot of
developments since Darwin. You adhere to a caricature that is outdated.
Almost everything can drive to totalitarianism, The idea that nothing is
innate drives to totalitarian social engineering. the idea that men are
diffe
Hi Friends.
Im my opinion, mathematical truth becomes a result of the antrophic
principle if we accept that life is a process of algorithmical discovery of
a description of the reality where the body is, so that this description
can be incorporated and used for survival. This discovery demand
co
Yes, I sent a search link for you to know the opinions about it.
in EP this your example does not offer a clear hypothesis. But there are
others that are evident. It depends on the context. for example , woman
have more accurate facial recognition habilities, but men perceive faster
than women f
Stephen,
The article illustrates the dangers of a premature modellization of a
problem. The urge to have a mathematical model forces to narrow the thing
to be modellized and to isolate it artificially from a wider context that
is crucial for the understanding of the problem. The result is a fine
mo
2012/12/8 Stephen P. King
> On 12/7/2012 6:01 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> Fantastic links, specially the latter. I´ll read it.
>
> This is my standpoint now:
>
> First is necessary to define existence. My standpoint is that what
> exists is what the mind assume
This speed in the evaluation is a consequence of evolutionary pressures: A
teleological agent that is executing a violent plan against us is much more
dangerous than a casual accident. because the first will continue harming
us, so a fast reaction against further damage is necessary, while in the
c
There are other examples of abilities optimized for speed. At the
functional level, a module for fast processing of logical rules involved in
cheating detection (or breaking of deontic rules ) has been discovered:
http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/papers/PNASCosmidesBarrettTooby2010.pdf
Appa
2012/11/20 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 20 Nov 2012, at 16:02, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2012/11/11 Bruno Marchal
>
>>
>> On 11 Nov 2012, at 01:29, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>
>> It is an observable fact. is obviously true that if you live
2012/11/11 Bruno Marchal
>
> On 11 Nov 2012, at 01:29, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> It is an observable fact. is obviously true that if you live in a
> society where everyone take something as true , no matter what, then it is
> true for one of its members, you, for exa
:38 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
>> It is not relativist post modernist, it is just the opposite
>>
>
> That Lamarckism would be true if society held it to be true? If that's
> not relativist post modernism, I don't know what is.
>
> Brent
>
>
>
&g
l, it is making use of the internally accumulated
evolutionary knowledge. It is what Konrad Lorenz suggested when he said
that the Kantian a prioris of the human mind , the intuitive logical,
existential and moral knowledge of the mind was harwired by evolution.
2012/11/10 Alberto G. Corona
> S
It is not relativist post modernist, it is just the opposite
it is the discovery of an absolute universal truth starting from nothing,
or if you like, from the most absolute relativism..
2012/11/11 Alberto G. Corona
> If All the rest is vaguely interesting for you, then it is no surpr
g use of the internally accumulated
evolutionary knowledge.
2012/11/10 Alberto G. Corona
> Better written:
>
>
>
> 2012/11/10 Alberto G. Corona
>
> I always emphasize that there is a evolutionary logic, which unlike any
>> other logic, is tautological,
Better written:
2012/11/10 Alberto G. Corona
> I always emphasize that there is a evolutionary logic, which unlike any
> other logic, is tautological, that is assume no axioms beyond natural
> selection (which is tautological per se)
>
> I will define here this logic as
I always emphasize that there is a evolutionary logic, which unlike any
other logic, is tautological, that is assume no axioms beyond natural
selection (which is tautological per se)
I will define here this logic as clear as I can.
Therefore evolutionary logic a good foundation for an absolute n
es and planets. This is the era of the false dichotomy
between is and ought. The results are the never ending waves of
totalitarianisms within Modernity.
2012/11/6 Alberto G. Corona
> Roger:
>
> That´s right
>
> The modern notion of free will is a nominalist
> <https://www
>
> : Is there something that I could know to be the case, and which is not
> expressed by a proposition that could be part of some scientific theory?"
>
> Yes . "I love my mother" is some knowledge that I know , and is not part
of a scientific theory.
We know reality because we live in the reality
inference possible. To anticipate that a
policeman knoking on the door will tell us bad news is not
adivination, for example.
2012/10/25 Bruno Marchal :
>
> On 24 Oct 2012, at 19:31, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> I dont believe that such genuine anticipation is possible, for a simple
>
I agree.
is there something that can be perceived that is not qualia? It´s
less qualia the shape and location of a circle in ha sheet of paper
than its color?.The fact that the position and radius of the circle
can be measured and communicated does not change the fact that they
produce a subject
unconsciously. Most of the time even we are not conscious of how much
information we gather.
2012/10/24 Alberto G. Corona
>
>
> 2012/10/24 Bruno Marchal
>
>>
>> On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
>>
>> http://www.frontiersin.org/**Perception_Sci
501 - 600 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
