Hi,
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 13:05 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
It's not entirely true to say you had to have used paths from the start,
since you can save the first selection to a channel, make the new one
with paths, including an approximate, much larger outer rectangle,
and then convert to
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 21:04 -0700, Barton wrote:
That's the gotcha that got me on this one. Another minor issue is that
immediately after running draw_circle, the stroke appears in the layer
dialog but it does not appear in the image itself unless you toggle the
layer's visibility
Moin,
we did it. It's not the final 2.4.0 release yet, but a first release
candidate is now available from
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.4/testing
Changes in GIMP 2.4.0-rc1
=
- further improvement to the Print plug-in
- completed the color management functionality
Moin,
here's an update of the update. We have made good progress since last
week and it is time to look at the list of showstoppers again:
78265 Add support for ICC color profiles
This is now (IMO) sufficiently implemented for 2.4. Still some minor
changes needed in the internals of the new
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:41 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that mockup basically aims to change
the aspect of the dialog without adding any enhancement. The tool does
exactly the same but the dialog looks like Photoshop's one.
The only improvement
Hi Raphael,
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:44 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Since Friday, I added a new option to the JPEG save dialog: Use
custom quality settings. If some quantization tables were attached
to the image when it was loaded, then this option allows you to use
them instead of the
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:54 +0200, Geert Jordaens wrote:
I get the feeling that we are mixing 2 things here.
1. scaling for display purposes (uniform X and Y scaling)
2. scaling as a effective drawing transformation. (X and Y scale can be
different)
For the second case, it only needs
Hi,
I am forwarding this message from Ted Gould to the list. He is not
subscribed and his posting probably is still being held in the
moderation queue.
Forwarded Message
From: Ted Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Cc: Glimmer Labs [EMAIL
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 10:05 +, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
I just stumbled across a similar issue with the latest version (at most a few
days old, I'll update to the head later tonight (GMT) : If I select the whole
image (pressing CTRL-A) and then I select a rectangle area out of that
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 18:36 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
Please fix these warnings and attach the updated patch to
bugzilla. This way it won't get lost.
The patch can unfortunately not be included in 2.4 because
we are too close to a release, and we don't depend on a glib
version
Moin,
there are still some bugs left on the 2.4 milestone and I would like to
comment on them, perhaps raising some interest here:
78265 Add support for ICC color profiles
I am currently finishing the remaining bits. Since last night the
color-managed display actually does the right thing.
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 21:20 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
Presently, the solution to this is to scale down incrementally (reduce
scale by 50% until you approach the desired scale, and then scale down
to that exact size.)
Nice tip. I'll try it.
It's not that comfortable but
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:27 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I'm trying to say that if this version took 2.4 years of development, it
would be a pitty if all the new stuff come together with this long time
issue.
Yes. It's a pity. But without a working patch we don't have much of a
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:27 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
You're absolutely right. This discussion is pointless. If you suggest
that a script for scaling down in several steps is a valid solution you
know as much about image manipulation as I do about coding. So don't
waste each
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 19:45 +0100, Nicola Archibald wrote:
Attached is a patch, against svn, which adds ACO importing, and CSS
color extraction, for the palette system.
The ACO code only reads the version 1 section at the moment, I plan on
finishing the version 2 support to extract
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 16:46 -0700, Don Rozenberg wrote:
I recently acquired a new PC with a dual core chip running Kubuntu
Feisty Fawn. So when I last tried to build Gimp, version 2.3.18, I used
make -j and the build terminated with an error in just a few seconds.
Is there a
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 03:44 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did notice that the file 'gap/sel-to-anim-img.scm' does not run under
the TinyScheme-based Script-fu (it uses some variables without defining
them). I have created a patch file for this which is available at
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 22:44 -0600, Esteban Barahona wrote:
A rational and respectful exchange of ideas about the GIMP UI should
be started. Personally, I think that this is a crucial time in the
development of this widely used software. A total redesign without
informing users may lead
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 23:50 +0200, Popolon wrote:
Here is an updated version for french.
Could have 1 or 2 mistakes, but mostly well updated.
Please do not send translation updates to the mailing-list nor to me in
personal. This is handled by the GNOME translation project and you
should
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 01:58 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
I am getting an error linking gimp-gap svn in a 64bit enviromment, in
both trunk and gap-2-2 branch:
That's a problem with the copy of libavcodec that is included with GAP.
You better disable support for libavcodec
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 03:44 -0400,
I did notice that the file 'gap/sel-to-anim-img.scm' does not run under
the TinyScheme-based Script-fu
Did you also check the other Script-Fu script in the gap subdirectory?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 04:31 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
3. I also see actually translated menu items (e.g.
Image/Video/Layer/Colors/Levels...) in English after replacing
/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gimp20-gap.mo with a new one and
restarting GIMP.
Are you absolutely sure
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 18:40 -0600, Esteban Barahona wrote:
I can translate to Spanish, how can I submit changes?
The translations for GIMP as well as for GAP are handled by the GNOME
translation project. If you want to help, please contact the Spanish
translation team:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 01:13 +0200, damianzalewski wrote:
I want you to show completely new layout of gimp.org instead of this
one at next.gimp.org
Please post this to the gimp-web mailing-list. Here is not the place to
discuss the web-site. And perhaps it would be a good idea to wait
Hi,
the problems you outlined can't be solved for the GAP 2.2.2 release.
This release is bug-fixes only and it is supposed to run with GIMP 2.2
and GIMP 2.4. So it can't use any new features from the GIMP 2.4 API.
If you want to make sure that the user experience with GAP 2.4 will be
better,
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 04:31 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
4. Script-Fu menu is created by Selection to AnimImage.
I have now added some code to Script-Fu that maps scripts that attempt
to register in one of the standard GIMP 2.2 submenus to the equivalent
place in the 2.4 menu
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 23:54 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Are you absolutely sure that you removed the fuzzy marker after
updating the translation?
Yes, I am.
OK, please try again after updating from SVN. I added some missing calls
to gimp_plugin_domain_register(). That should
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:23 +0200, Anke Lange wrote:
like everybody else, I am very exiting about the release of the Gimp 2.4.
Though I was wondering, if GAP will be running on the new Gimp.
I tried to install it to the 2.3.19, but as you proberbly would have
known, it doesn't work
Hi,
I forgot to say. If anyone wants to update translations for the 2.2.2
release of gimp-gap (http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gimp-gap#gap-2-2),
please do so quickly.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi,
On 8/2/07, Esteban Barahona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and one of 1 Dimension Menus which is a bit more matured (see attachment...
In general it is considered a bad idea to send attachments to
mailing-lists. No matter how small they are. Please upload things to
your website or use the public
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 11:29 -0600, Esteban Barahona wrote:
here's the mock-up
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/61253775/
and here's the idea of 1 Dimension Menus explained:
http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/61254113/
Sorry, but these images are simply too small. The text can
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:34 -0600, Esteban Barahona wrote:
In the first image the transparency shows what is hided, not how it
will be displayed.
Still this kind of user interface would need support from the toolkit. I
don't think it can be written on top of what is available in GTK+
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GTK+ can be ... hmm, a bit refractory to even small change from outside.
That is simply not true. There's just a high quality level which means
more API and code review.
How do you think some fairly radical change like this
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:11 +1200, Robert Carter wrote:
I don't seek to change the gimp's default key bindings and menu but
to offer an alternative that may be activated if wanted. Do you think
this can be realistically integrated with the gimp's present
architecture?
There is
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:43 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
I maintain a wiki page in Russian [1] for those coming with Photoshop
background. It covers topics as
- support for features of PSD (open/save), as of most recent
development version of GIMP;
- using various PS resources
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:25 +1200, Robert Carter wrote:
And also possibly (less important)
= GTK behaviours of the panels (photoshop has several tools on the
same button)
= Fullscreen behaviour (panels remain visible, windowed / grey
ground / black ground - toggling)
My main
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 23:13 -0500, Tim Jedlicka wrote:
Great! - looks like 2.4 is getting closer. Is there a hard dependency
on GTK+ 2.10.13?
Yes, there is. And it is there for a very good reason (bug #436242).
I run Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty) which unfortunately is still on
libgtk2.0-dev
Moin,
gimp-2.3.19 bas been uploaded to ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.3.
Changes in GIMP 2.3.19
==
- support long layer names in PSD files
- improved EXIF handling in the JPEG file plug-in
- added control for the playback speed in the Animation Playback plug-in
- avoid
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 18:34 -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
So I pose this question...if print via PDF is to be considered, why
remove the existing PS system, which is pretty much the best quality
PostScript among all of the apps (commercial and free)?
We are not removing anything. So far
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 16:47 +0200, Stefan Roellin wrote:
I think the current implementation of the print plugin is fine, i.e.
generate the PDF with opaque images. If someone needs to have a PDF with
images with alpha values, it would be possible to write a 'save-as-pdf
plugin' similar to
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 14:10 +0200, Stefan Roellin wrote:
The current implementation/patch now has a disadvantage: if you print to a
postscript target, the image has to be exported TWICE: once for the 'print
preview widget' (with alpha) and once for the postscript target (without
alpha).
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 11:52 +0300, Aurimas Juška wrote:
* jigsaw -- looks like lot of code would have to be changed to make it
work with GimpZoomPreview correctly. However, I don't understand why
this plug-in would need zoom preview at all. It doesn't do anything
that someone would like
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:11 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
I mean python 2.6 -- that's SVN python's current version number. I
believe a release is due fairly soon.
Have you contacted the python developers then? This looks a lot like a
regression in Python and I guess they would like to hear
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 09:15 +0200, jEsuSdA wrote:
Surfing the web i found a interesting photo retouch software for Mac.
Its name is pixelmator and its interface looks like similar to Gimp.
Have you ever know something about this software?
Could be some Gimp code used? It will be
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:29 +0300, Aurimas Juška wrote:
I used to add GimpProgressbar in order to stop showing progress of
temporary processing in image window (it was just created to capture
progress events but not shown). Removing it seems to make the problem
disappear. Is there any
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 12:26 +0200, Akki Nitsch wrote:
The thing is that it is NOT possible to get the screenshot into GIMP
via clipboard
Please ask Apple to fix their X11 server then. This is basic
functionality that should be supported. You paid for this operating
system, didn't you?
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 01:01 +0200, Akki Nitsch wrote:
But under Mac OS there are some problems. I've installed the GIMP on
two different ways under Mac OS. The first way is via Mac Ports and
the Acquire-Screenshot-function can only get screen-shots of programs
running under the
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:47 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
I played around with gmemusage to get a feel for what was going
on. GIMP 2.3 uses between 33.9 and 35.0 Mb on startup (no images
loaded, and I don't know why it isn't always the same). For
comparison, 2.2.13 uses about 13.9 Mb at
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:50 +0300, Aurimas Juška wrote:
While testing my plug-in I noticed, that after quiting the plug-in The
Gimp *usually* (but sometimes not, not depending on what you do)
prints something like that: plug_in_flush(): broken pipe. It seems The
Gimp wants to communicate
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 15:47 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
I played around with gmemusage to get a feel for what was going
on. GIMP 2.3 uses between 33.9 and 35.0 Mb on startup (no images
loaded, and I don't know why it isn't always the same). For
comparison, 2.2.13 uses about 13.9 Mb at
Hi,
due to a regression in the PSD loader that was introduced with the
2.2.16 release, we had to roll out another release in the stable 2.2
series. The source code for GIMP 2.2.17 has been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.2/
The following issues have been addressed with this release:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:29 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
Two hours. The vision has been simmering in the back of the minds of
everybody involved for all the years that they have been working on
GIMP.
If you are now interpreting this vision that way that GIMP is not meant
to be used for
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 18:37 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
For my part I miss save a copy as... which in some programs
saves the file like Save As but doesn't change the filename of
what's being edited.
GIMP 2.3 has this feature for quite a while already.
I wonder if it'd be possible, for gimp
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 19:15 -0400, guepe wrote:
In fact, my patch... does exactly that : if defaults settings are
already saved, jpeg is saved with the parasites one (erasing the
hardcoded ones). If no settings have been saved, then hardcoded are
used.
There is another player in the
Moin,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 00:03 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
The JPEG plug-in should not use the last-used values when being run
non-interactively from the Save action. It should use the, now
user-configurable, default values. Of course if the jpeg-save-options
parasite is set on the image
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 18:42 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
Side note: as suggested by Sven in #gimp, I just had a look at
ImageMagick to try and find out how they retreive or guess the quality
settings from JPEG files. The code is about 100 lines long and can be
found in
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 09:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha, cross post .
Cross post? Huh?
Btw, is it intentional that you are mailing from two (or three)
different accounts and never put your real name in the From field? I
find the use of two accounts annoying and the lack of a real
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 11:36 -0600, Scott wrote:
Just curious, what would be so wrong with saving the original file as
a backup before doing a destructive save? Emacs only bites me when I'm
*really* stupid
There's nothing wrong with that. It's even on the list of things that
the file
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 14:07 -0600, Scott wrote:
If more users would be so persistent, as you call it, then there would
probably not a single developer left who would feel that developing GIMP
is fun. There would probably be noone who would be willing to spend
his/her free time on it.
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 22:13 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
Back to the topic: I propose to display the quality settings when an
image is resaved as jpeg for the first time, if it's possible.
I don't know how it's done, but when I take my image to PS from my
camera, it asks me to
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 08:17 -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Note that GIMP is not the only application that does this;
Why should any application do what you suggest? If you open a JPEG file
and save it again as JPEG, then the original quality factor is
completely irrelevant. You are doing
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does your reply indicate you take a this feature not a bug approach here
and you think is the best way gimp should deal with this situation?
Indeed. When you open a JPEG file, then you have a decoded image. The
settings that
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 17:37 +0200, Roel Schroeven wrote:
2. read the quality when loading a jpeg, and used that to save the image
(if save as is not used).
Last time we discussed this (a couple of years ago), libjpeg didn't
allow us to read the JPEG quality factor that was used to save
Hi,
a new GIMP 2.2 release has been uploaded to
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v2.2/
GIMP 2.2.16 is a bug-fix release in the stable GIMP 2.2 series. It fixes
security problems in some file load plug-ins and improves robustness and
forward compatibility of the XCF loader. In particular the following
Hi,
I would like to say special thanks to Mukund and Raphaël who both helped
during the last week to fix the reported and some unreported security
problems in our file load plug-ins. Without your help we wouldn't have
been able to respond to the vulnerability report so quickly.
Sven
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 18:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
What I didn't know (and wouldn't expect) is that Gimp will destroy my
pictures without warning me.
And that's exactly what I get.
I have a picture taken at 95, open it and save it, and it ends up at 85.
Why is that?
Hi,
here's what I suggest that we do (short-term). It should be a simple
change and it will avoid that what happened to Guillermo happens to
others in the future.
The JPEG plug-in should not use the last-used values when being run
non-interactively from the Save action. It should use the, now
Hi,
just for the record: We found a way to make the highlighting less
confusing without going back to the old state. The specification and the
code has been updated.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 11:38 -0500, Glimmer Labs wrote:
Attempting to map a Scheme function in Script-Fu/Tiny-Fu to an entire
image using the PDB functions gimp-drawable-get-pixel and
gimp-drawable-set-pixel is painfully slow, so we've been trying to
build a mk_foreign_func'ed function to
Hi Peter,
you have been working on an updated specification for the rectangle
tools in GIMP 2.4. The current state is here:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Specifications
First of all, could you please move this specification to its own page
and link to it from the specifications page? We will
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 10:20 -0700, Akkana Peck wrote:
If the canvas isn't scrolled, the spec should probably mention what
happens on the next keypress. Suppose I have the mouse cursor over a
side handle and I press right-arrow. The side handle moves right by
one image pixel. Now the side
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 17:24 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
When the mouse is moved over a side handle, a
side handle and two corner handles are drawn. If I want to reach the
corner, I aim for the highlighted rectangle. But when my mouse reaches
it, it turns out that what was highlighted
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 21:04 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
by using different graphics (stipple) we avoid that these two lines
are interpreted as showing corner handles. They don't.
Well, if they don't show the corner handles, what do they show then? And
isn't it important to show the corner
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 11:01 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
(2) It mixes filenames with strings displayed in the GUI. Filenames can
be of a different encoding and therefore need special treatment. In
particular you must not call g_path_get_dirname() on the result of
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 17:05 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
It happens after the image is loaded; don't know whether it's before
or after i zoom in, but I scribble on the image with the pencil tool
after zooming in, and afterwards, these messages are there.
I take it as a strong suggestion
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 12:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless what he's implemented is bad why not just comit anyway until you
get around to doing it better/diffeently?
I rejected the patch for several reasons, all of them technical:
(1) It adds a label for a potentially long
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the conditional should and the uncertainty probably. I'm not
being dogmatic or presumptuous. I'm doing _exactly_ what you suggest
proposing a re-examination and also proposing an alternative that I
consider better.
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think nearest neighbour is non technical, very obvious in it's meaning
and readily understood.
IMO it is very technical and the vast majority of users does not
understand its meaning. They also don't understand Linear or
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 16:39 -0400, Louis Desjardins wrote:
Carol was at LGM this year and she was not hiding away, at least from
what I saw. Anyone could meet her face to face. I had the chance to
have a few short conversations with her but being the organiser time
has not allowed us to
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:18 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
From aggressive answers, to unanswered mails (not that bad),
It would help a lot if you could try to be more precise in your mails.
That would avoid the need to ask for details. If a dialog is titled
Save as JPEG, then why do you
Hi Bill,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
It would be helpful to get more input from yosh.
He already said (in this thread) that he is very busy this week and that
he will comment on it later. Can we please just calm down now and give
him time to answer?
Sven
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 01:43 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I'm using 2.3.18 and I noticed that if I apply the autocrop layer
function twice, it crops the entire image to the layer dimensions.
It's like if you apply autocrop layer on a layer that has been cropped
it acts like the
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 07:58 +0100, Alex Pounds wrote:
There has never been such an option in the Save as... dialog.
My copy of the Gimp disagrees with you on this point:
http://www.ethicsgirls.com/stuff/exifshot.jpg
That's not the Save As dialog which would be the file-chooser you
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 11:03 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
I see consistent behavior between dragging node to border to remove it
and dragging a guide to border to remove it, but could we possibly
make Delete button work too?
That can be easily arranged. We would accept a patch for
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ I set up mouse scroll to zoom in and out and exited. I get the
following helpful msg:
You will have to restart GIMP for the following changes to take effect:
temp-path
swap-path
That's a bug in the preferences dialog
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed it may be best if this only gets shown when relevant. If there are
no indexed layers present (which will often be the case) it is irrelevant
and just slows the user by feeding him unneeded info to parse.
It is very
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:55 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I was not intending to emphasise layers, although I was trying to
cover the case where an indexed layer was added. The basic point is that
this message is great if there is an indexed element in the image,
otherwise
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 14:31 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Mukund Sivaraman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need at least libexif 0.6.15.
The summary should indicate this - use too old rather than not found.
It could do that. But there is already informative output when the test
for
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here no error is shown. It ends with this output:
make[2]: Entering directory `/svn/gimp'
test -z /opt/gimp/bin || mkdir -p -- /opt/gimp/bin
/usr/bin/install -c 'gimptool-2.0' '/opt/gimp/bin/gimptool-2.0'
test -z
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 21:01 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
I have a Panasonic FZ50 whose EXIF data was always preserved by GIMP.
Now, opening a file straight from the camera with GIMP and immediately
saving it deletes the EXIF. And in the Save as... dialog, there is
no option to save (or
Hi,
I don't know if everyone of the GIMP development team is as annoyed of
Carol as I am, but I know that there are quite a few people who are.
It has been a pleasure for me to notice that she stopped mailing to
gimp-developer and gimp-user a while ago. In my opinion, the quality of
the lists
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 02:41 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
I am having an 'overwrite file' problem in 2.3.18.
When trying to save a file that already exists, ask as
usual if you want to overwrite. If you say YES, it does
NOT overwrite, and writes a Untilted.xcf file instead.
Are you
Perhaps some of you want to help with this survey...
---BeginMessage---
Hi sven from the Gimp project,
As part of the final paper of my study I am applying the stakeholder theory to
Free/Libre/OpenSource (FLOSS) projects. By this thesis I investigate the
typical relations of FLOSS projects
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 13:04 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I wouldn't say it's a critic item, but the current algorithms are right
now quite sub-standard.
I might be wrong but I think the current algorithms are basically the
same as the ones used in GIMP 2.2. So there's really no
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 05:53 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in result of some comments in #166130 I have been looking at image scaling
in scale-funcs.c
It seems the needs of scale down are quite different from the
interpolation of scaling up so there are certain compromises in
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 14:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For GIMP 2.6, we will need high-quality and optimised scaling algorithms
implemented as GEGL operators. Perhaps it would be a good idea to write
such operators now so that we can start to use them when we port the
core to
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 01:53 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
With these bug fixes going in, not only is it now possible to build GIMP
from a clean/read-only SVN tree (i.e. only touched with ./autogen.sh),
make distcheck is working too. Well, almost, but it's very nearly there.
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:51 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
This will all help to keep generated files out of a version-controlled
working source tree. (The fewer question marks you get from svn stat, the
better.)
Actually, now that we accepted some of the proposed changes, building
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:00 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
1. 'make' runs. Eventually it reaches the imagemap plugin directory.
2. imap_csim.l is used to generate imap_csim_(parse|lex).[ch] with flex.
That shouldn't happen as we keep the generated files in SVN and you
shouldn't have to
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:10 -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
What is the intention behind version-controlling those files? I didn't
notice anything particularly painful to generate.
Most of these files are in SVN because they contain translatable
strings. The message catalogs are built
901 - 1000 of 3017 matches
Mail list logo
