Hi Peter,
I believe what's being referenced is than in z/OS V2R1 they enhanced FORCE with
the ability to target a specific task i.e. FORCE jobname,TCB=
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieag100/force.htm
To accomplish this previously would have re
>I believe what's being referenced is than in z/OS V2R1 they enhanced FORCE
>with the ability to target a specific task i.e. FORCE jobname,TCB=
Thanks, Sam
And, yes, this informal technical discussions' value is what management does
(often) not value high enough. Of course, informal
W dniu 2016-10-12 o 00:26, Charles Mills pisze:
Ha! You can download COMMAND.COM here
http://www.allbootdisks.com/disk_contents/dos.html. The 1988 MS-DOS 3.3 variant
is 25.3K
Every .COM file was limited to 64kB size. That's .EXE which could be
larger.
BTW: The story about "idiot user who
Jorge,
If you have the Tivoli Decision Support product (MVS Performance Management
Component), I have coding and reporting I can share with you. It provides me
with daily reporting on hourly MSU usage and 4-hour rolling average MSU's by
LPAR and by mainframe. The reporting matches the SCRT re
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:39:29 -0500, Bill Woodger wrote:
>I think there's at best a great deal of "faulty memory" here.
This story was posted by the same person who posted this:
http://www.computerworld.com/article/3099975/data-center/blue-screen-of-death-mainframe-style.html#tk.drr_mlt
which was
The Sharky seems to be a "column" type thing. The "fish" are the people who
provide the stories. Reality-check not required, as long as the story will be
"popular".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
OK, so I'm weird. That should be well known around here . I'm really
getting into System REXX to help replace what CA-OPS/MVS does in our shop
(remember we're dying and OPS license expires in Feb 2017).
What I am doing is using the MPFLSTxx member of PARMLIB to run a user exit,
given to me by Dana
What about looking into using TSSO (see CBT file 404). Then from your MPF you
can issue a TSSO command, or just use TSSO instead of MPF.
--
Lionel B. Dyck (TRA Contractor)
Mainframe Systems Programmer
Enterprise Infrastruct
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
wrote:
> What about looking into using TSSO (see CBT file 404). Then from your MPF
> you can issue a TSSO command, or just use TSSO instead of MPF.
>
Oh, yeah. That does work on z/OS 1.12. I'll look at it.
>
> --
I'm looking for a way to identify volumes in a SMS storage group that have a
different status than what was defined in the storage group (i.e. volumes
that are enabled in the storage group that are currently DISNEW because a
vary command was issued). Anyone know of a way to identify this?
Than
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:31:16 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
> What I'm trying to do is emulate the use of "global" CA-OPS/MVS variables.
> I.e. variables which can
>be created in any rule and read / modified / deleted in any other rule.
John,
I emulated the services of Netview global variables (a
No worries. Sorry I wasn't clearer the first time. Byproduct of trying to
write too quickly, I'm afraid.
Regards,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:47 PM
To:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Dana Mitchell wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 07:31:16 -0500, John McKown <
> john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What I'm trying to do is emulate the use of "global" CA-OPS/MVS
> variables. I.e. variables which can
> >be created in any rule and read / modifie
Does this command give you want you're looking for? I can't test it because I
don't have a STORGRP with volumes in a different status, but it does list the
status of each volume in the group - if they aren't all the same that should be
some kind of indication of difference.
D SMS,STORGRP(sg
If this is sufficient, it can be done easier with ISMF: 6 storage group - listv
- sort on SMS status as in col25. You will see the exceptions at the top Disnew
before Enable before Quiesced
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
If you are looking for a way to report on what state a volume was when it was
added to an SMS storage group and when did that state change, then SMF Type42
Subtype3 records should help.
But that will be dependent on how long you keep your SMF Data, and when you
noticed the state changed.
Lizette
John, try calling bpxwunix. Works great for me. What is great he the that
results are returned in an array stem variable).
ITschal
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-12 באוק׳ 2016, בשעה 15:31, John McKown
כתב/ה:
> OK, so I'm weird. That should be well known around here . I'm really
> getting into Syste
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> John, try calling bpxwunix. Works great for me. What is great he the that
> results are returned in an array stem variable).
>
I'll try that. I wonder if I can do that in a non-TSO server. I'm trying
to avoid TSO based servers due to the
Don't make your mph exit serial. Just issue a 'F AXR,rexxname parm' to start
the Rexx msg handler. This way the Rexx will wait until a TSO region is
available, but your exit is not waiting for it to start.
ITschak
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-12 באוק׳ 2016, בשעה 16:42, John McKown
כתב/ה:
>> On
Another option could be DCOLLECT data.
The CONSTANTS FOR DSGSTAT AND DSGSYSST
z/OS V2.1 DFSMS Access Method Services Commands z/OS
SC23-6846
Contains information on the DCOLLECT data and record types.
Naviquest or ISMF Option G (REPORTS) should help with running a report from
DCOLLECT.
However
I guess I should have clarified a little more. I'm looking to find volumes
that have a current status that does not match what is defined in the
storage group. We rarely make SMS changes. What has happened over time is
that some volumes have been DISNEW'ed to clear them or ENABLED (from DISNEW)
What I meant was with option 6, then option 1, then LISTV in front of the SG.
This will give you all the volumes, which you can sort on SMS status, e.g. col.
25.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Chuck Kreiter
Se
QuiKref from Chicago-soft also has an option to list all dasd by various
columns, one being STATUS.
Great product and not very expensive.
John Clifford
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Chuck Kreiter
wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to identify volumes in a SMS storage group that have
> a
> di
Does anyone know if this product, Automatic Binary Optimizer, will actually
migrate Cobol V4 to V6 for you? Our IBM reps are telling us that it will
actually do the migration for you. Based on what I've read, it is a
performance product and I didn't see that capability.
Thanks to everyone in
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> Don't make your mph exit serial. Just issue a 'F AXR,rexxname parm' to
> start the Rexx msg handler. This way the Rexx will wait until a TSO region
> is available, but your exit is not waiting for it to start.
>
The AXREXX macro has SYNC
That appears to show the current status, not what was defined in the SMS SG
for the volume.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
Chuck Kreiter wrote:
> What has happened over time is that some volumes have been DISNEW'ed to clear
> them or ENABLED (from DISNEW) to allow for new allocations. These were all
> done via the VARY SMS,VOLUME(xx),DISABLE,NEW type commands.
Others gave you good and interesting replies.
I
On 10/12/2016 10:50 AM, Lopez, Sharon wrote:
Does anyone know if this product, Automatic Binary Optimizer, will actually
migrate Cobol V4 to V6 for you? Our IBM reps are telling us that it will
actually do the migration for you. Based on what I've read, it is a
performance product and I didn
Send the msg to cn(00) as well just to verify that Mvs send works.
נשלח מה-iPad שלי
ב-12 באוק׳ 2016, בשעה 18:00, John McKown
כתב/ה:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>>
>> Don't make your mph exit serial. Just issue a 'F AXR,rexxname parm' to
>> start the Rexx m
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:02:28 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>
>> John, try calling bpxwunix. Works great for me. What is great he the that
>> results are returned in an array stem variable).
>
>I'll try that. I wonder if I can do that in a non-T
Nope. Agree 100% with what @Tom says. The ABO is not a source code migration
tool, it is a compiler. Really -- a very weird compiler. Most compilers take
source code in and produce object code out. The ABO is a compiler that takes
object code in and produces object code out. What good is that? It t
Mmmm... I wonder why they would say that?
It takes the existing executable code of your Enterprise COBOL programs and
optimises them for new instructions available on ARCH(!0) and ARCH(11).
So if you hardware is up-to-date or so, it gives you a route for existing COBOL
executables to take advan
> I wonder why they would say that?
Because they are sales reps, not techies?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Woodger
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: AB
I suppose the cunning thing to do would be to write it into the contract, then
you get IBM to do the migration to V6 "for free"...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv
So if you are not ready for COBOL V5/V6 migration and want the benefit of some
of the optimizations, then ABO can take your program and attempt to optimize to
a new program that is optimized.
However, it is not a migration.
And if you have a requirement for your applications to validate any pro
Fix list for ABO.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27047229#28062016
Looks good... except for one thing:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PI68138
"
* USERS AFFECTED: Users of the IBM Autom
Having done some testing with ABO and COBOL V6, you will find that ABO (ARCH10)
runs better than COBOL V4 and COBOL V6 (ARCH10) runs better then ABO. When you
start using ABO you need to keep using ABO for new compiles (compile/link/ABO)
or convert to COBOL V6. Depending on the size of the LOA
2 Thoughts to consider:
- ABO only runs on z/OS 2.1 and above
- ABO creates a new load module that (IMHO) needs as much Q/A testing as
compiling in the newest compiler.
IIRC, back in the day, going to Enterprise COBOL, there was less
than 8% of COBOL source that needed
to be remedi
charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) writes:
> Why is that useful? Because the speed gains in the last several generations
> of mainframe are not in clock/cycle speed. System 370 object code does not
> run any faster on a z13 than on a z10. The gains are in new instructions.
> The same functionality as
IBM is wrong. Tom is right. He lives for moments like this. ;-)
Optimization occurs at the load module end only. You might view ABO as a
stop-gap on the road to compiler upgrade. You get savings now even while (you
may be) upgrading at the source end. ABO-optimized code is not as efficient as
V
Since this was added, is anyone using it?
What I am curious about is does the JCL or SMF Records indicate what library the
program was loaded from when executed?
Would I report on it like I would a Steplib/Joblib process? Or is there a
different process?
My thought is a production batch abends,
The only difficulty in migration to Cobol V5 and above is the need for PDS/E
datasets.
Since z/OS V2.2 is providing a way to not have to UPDATE all production JCL with
PDS/E datasets, that issue with migration, imo, is greatly reduced.
So once z/OS V2.2 is installed, migration plans to COBOL V5 a
Well, I'm still going to disagree on the level of "testing" required.
You (now) need to check for the stupid out-of-order PERFORM ... THRU ... but
otherwise you are good to go.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acces
Many useful replies here. Just a note of caution. Automation that depends on
starting a new address space will probably work fine 99% of the time. We
previously used a product like that. The problem is when automation needs to
take action to recover from a resource shortage. Spool full and ASM s
Create/delete catalog entries in a dedicated usercat.
Rob Schramm
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016, 11:42 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:02:28 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
> >
> >>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Rob Schramm wrote:
> Create/delete catalog entries in a dedicated usercat.
>
Hum, would be difficult to store a value into the catalog entry. But a
DEFINE & DELETE should be fairly quick, at least compared to actually
creating a data set.
>
> Rob Schramm
>
>
You could write a routine to use system name/token pairs for the info.
Here is an article I wrote at the turn of the century about them
http://www.lbdsoftware.com/Using_System_Name-Token_Pairs.pdf
--
Lionel B. Dyck (TRA Cont
Thanks for the reply.
The problem I'm having is that the definition for each volume as defined in the
storage group doesn't show up on this list as best I can tell . The status that
is shown is the current status of the volume. I need to identify those that
have a status different than what
On 10/12/2016 12:35 PM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Since this was added, is anyone using it?
What I am curious about is does the JCL or SMF Records indicate what library the
program was loaded from when executed?
Would I report on it like I would a Steplib/Joblib process? Or is there a
different p
Hello,
I read in places where IBM gives both pros and cons to running USS with a code
page other than 1047, if for example your 3270 terminal emulator is set to
Danish. I also find instructions such as this, though I'm not sure if this is
all that is necessary to switch USS encoding:
http://
On 10/12/2016 12:29 PM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
IBM is wrong. Tom is right. He lives for moments like this. ;-)
I resemble that remark ;-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes:
> count of latency to memory (& cache miss), when measured in count of
> processor cycles is comparable to 60s latency to disk when measured in
> count of 60s processor cycles.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2016f.html#91 ABO Automatic Binary Optimize
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> IIRC, I've used BPXWUNIX from IRXJCL. I was trying to invent a smarter
> BPXBATCH. Worked well. I was able to allocate stdout and stderr to
> SYSOUT in the era before BPXBATCH supported t
HLQ (tousercat) .varname.value
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 9:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: System REXX and UNIX
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> HLQ (tousercat) .varname.value
>
What if "value" is does not adhere to a DSN node restrictions? Using
bpxwunix() in a TSO REXX environment seems to be the way to go, at least at
present. I can do things like:
stdin.0=0
stdout.0=0
stderr.0
Robert,
I was adding to your code the new panels that are available in z/OS 2.1. It
looks like now there are some that do not have unique display values:
RES and RM both display RESOURCE
SP and SO both display SPOOL...
So I tried this instead. Self maintaining and relatively easily understoo
Valid point :)
For another wild idea, use ENQ :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of John McKown
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 12:28 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: System REXX and UNIX
>
> On
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:26:47 +, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I read in places where IBM gives both pros and cons to running USS with a code
>page other than 1047, if for example your 3270 terminal emulator is set to
>Danish. I also find instructions such as this, though I'm not sure if
> Ah! I am starting to understand. Leap Second steering is accomplished
with
> the PTFF instruction and is independent of CVTLSO. PTFF appears to slow
down
> the physical clock.
>
> So ... steering and CVTLSO are essentially alternatives, right? CVTLSO
> should not include any leap seconds that wer
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:27:58 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>> HLQ (tousercat) .varname.value
>
>What if "value" is does not adhere to a DSN node restrictions?...
>
What would the dreaded DISABLE(DSNCHECK) do for you?
-- gil
---
Hello IBM-MAINers,
I wanted to ask about the usefulness of the IBM Education Assistance (IEA) for
z/OS.
A little background: IEA is found here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/IBMIEAV22avail?Open and provides
concise and technical information about a specific function introduce
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:27:58 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> >> HLQ (tousercat) .varname.value
> >
> >What if "value" is does not adher
I have an application and I want to change the the userid. I have the RACF
macros coded but I'm having trouble coming up with the source of TERMID. Where
do I get the TERMID?
The code in question looks like this:
MODESET MODE=SUP
LAR7,RACFWORK
MVC RACRWORK,RAC
On 2016-10-12 16:35, Marna WALLE wrote:
Hello IBM-MAINers,
I wanted to ask about the usefulness of the IBM Education Assistance (IEA) for
z/OS.
A little background: IEA is found here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/IBMIEAV22avail?Open and provides concise
and technical infor
Noone on my team has heard of this. Sounds good but we'll check it out
and give feedback. Thanks, Bonnie
Bonnie Barthel | z/OS Support | IBM Strategic Outsourcing Delivery |
720.396.6755 | pager: cobon...@vtext.com
From: Marna Walle/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
I never heard of it, either.
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
-- Original message--
From: Bonnie C Barthel
Date: Wed, Oct 12, 2016 5:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU;
Subject:Re: IBM Education Assistance for z/OS - Useful??
Noone on my team has heard of this. Sounds good but we
W dniu 2016-10-12 o 19:26, Lindy Mayfield pisze:
Hello,
I read in places where IBM gives both pros and cons to running USS with a code
page other than 1047, if for example your 3270 terminal emulator is set to
Danish. I also find instructions such as this, though I'm not sure if this is
all
>From your current ACEE?
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ichb200/ich2b2_ACEE_and_related_control_blocks.htm
52 (34) ADDRESS 4 ACEETRMP Address that points to the terminal ID. The field is
zero for non-terminal users.
Charles
-Original Message-
@George, thanks. I'm looking at the from a software development point of
view, not a sysprog point of view.
So if a shop is using an ETS and does not schedule the change then the TOD
clock will be steered into reflecting the leap seconds, right? The TOD clock
will slow down until it falls back to
W dniu 2016-10-12 o 22:35, Marna WALLE pisze:
Hello IBM-MAINers,
I wanted to ask about the usefulness of the IBM Education Assistance (IEA) for
z/OS.
A little background: IEA is found here:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/IBMIEAV22avail?Open and provides concise
and technical
On 2016-10-12 15:45, Charles Mills wrote:
> @George, thanks. I'm looking at the from a software development point of
> view, not a sysprog point of view.
>
> So if a shop is using an ETS and does not schedule the change then the TOD
> clock will be steered into reflecting the leap seconds, right?
>From your current ACEE?
>http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ichb200/ich2b2_ACEE_and_related_control_blocks.htm
>
>52 (34) ADDRESS 4 ACEETRMP Address that points to the terminal ID. The field is
>zero for non-terminal users.
>Charles
Yes, the Batch job is
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:58:12 -0500, Janet Graff wrote:
>I have an application and I want to change the the userid. I have the RACF
>macros coded but I'm having trouble coming up with the >source of TERMID.
>Where do I get the TERMID?
It would help to know why you want to do that, and what yo
On 2016-10-12 15:20, R.S. wrote:
>
> Well, I always use non-US codepage on my 3270 emulator. Reason: I'm Pole,
> speak Polish, sometimes write Polish naational characters. ;-) Usually I use
> CP 870, but there is also similar codepage with EURO sign. For C programming
> I've used to use CP 1047
Was I being clear? You asked "where do I get the TERMID?" and I meant "why not
pick up your current TERMID from your existing ACEE?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Janet Graff
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016
In our experience the need for PDSE datasets was far from the only
difficulty in migrating to COBOL V5 (and that really wasn't the hard
part). Many compiles take drastically more CPU time as well as require
more region. While this is documented we were stunned by the orders of
magnitude. Compile
On 12/10/2016 05:45:48 PM, , Charles Mills wrote:
> @George, thanks. I'm looking at the from a software development point of
> view, not a sysprog point of view.
>
> So if a shop is using an ETS and does not schedule the change then the
TOD
> clock will be steered into reflecting the leap seconds,
You could save yourself a lot of trouble and do a SAVESCDS before you make
your ACS routine changes.
On 12 October 2016 at 18:08, Chuck Kreiter wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> The problem I'm having is that the definition for each volume as defined
> in the storage group doesn't show up o
On 12 October 2016 at 13:56, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> You are correct: you don't need an LE environment to use the BPX kernel
> service calls.
Indeed. I do it from non-LE assembler all the time.
> REXX doesn't have/use an LE environment AFAIK. I don't know
> much about the System REXX environment
"Eeek" pretty much sums it all. Even between latin1, latin9 and utf-8 is a
huge eek. They got their own problems, too.
ISPF-L, no, MVS-OE list, yes. But since it's often a system wide setting that
IBM may or may not recommend, that’s why I chose IBM-Main first to ask. It
affect the entire m
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Marna WALLE wrote:
>
> Hello IBM-MAINers,
> I wanted to ask about the usefulness of the IBM Education Assistance (IEA)
> for z/OS.
>
> A little background: IEA is found here:
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/pages/IBMIEAV22avail?Open and
> provides c
Got it! Thanks much.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of George Kozakos
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 3:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How set CVTLSO?
On 12/10/2016 05:45:48 PM, , Charles Mills
>It would help to know why you want to do that, and what you intend to do after
>you have the ACEE. It's possible that there are alternatives that >would be
>better, which we might recommend if we had some more information.
>However, you don't _need_ a TERMID unless you're doing a RACROUTE
>R
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:52:09 -0400, George Kozakos wrote:
>
>z/OS does not affect the hardware TOD clock. If the leap second change is
>positive, Timer processing spins on all CPUs for the amount of the leap
>second change and CVTLSO is updated. STCK time does not change but UTC/GMT
>jumps backward
I'm going to try to walk a delicate line here. I don't want to offend the fine
folks at IBM, and IBM's compiler people are a bright, bright bunch of folks up
in Toronto. They know more about compilers than I ever will. But, that said ...
I agree with you on testing. A recompile of unedited sourc
On 12 October 2016 at 18:25, Janet Graff
<004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I changed the TERMID to point to a D'0' but I'm getting the same error message
>
> ICH408I JOB(JIGRACF ) STEP(RUN ) 944
> LOGON/JOB INITIATION - USER AT TERMINAL NOT RACF-DEFINED
> IR
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:53:29 -0500, Janet Graff wrote:
>I am writing a test program for a system level task. The system level task
>accepts cross memory service calls from various address spaces including CICS,
>IDMS and IMS so it needs to be able to handle secondary ACEEs. Instead of
>bring
I am by no means an expert on this topic but keep in mind of course -- in
addition to Walt's excellent tips -- that not every customer uses RACF: some
use CA TSS and some use CA ACF2. While a lot of the behavior of the three
subsystems is the same, some behavior is definitely different. Does it
>Thanks for the info. It helps a bit, but not enough.
>First, just to make sure you know, you can't do a RACROUTE REQUEST=VERIFY
>while running in cross-memory mode. You would need to create a >request for
>another task running in your server primary, queue the request to the task,
>and suspen
Put the address of the new ACEE in ASCBSENV and/or TCBSENV as appropriate?
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2016, at 21:36, Janet Graff
<004dc9e91b6d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>> Thanks for the info. It helps a bit, but not enough.
>
>> First, just to make sure you know, you can
On 12/10/2016 07:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> I understand that the TOD clock continues to be updated during that spin.
> Are processes otherwise quiesced or may they continue to execute until
> they do (e.g.) STCK?
>
> What happens to the clock comparator and to other STIMER-queued events?
> Som
>Put the address of the new ACEE in ASCBSENV and/or TCBSENV as appropriate?
>J R
I think it's ASXBSENV.
For my test application TCBSENV is 0.
I get a S0C4 when I do attempt to replace ASXBSENV despite being authorized and
in supervisor mode. It feels like there is a RACROUTE macro or equival
>>Put the address of the new ACEE in ASCBSENV and/or TCBSENV as appropriate?
>>J R
>I think it's ASXBSENV.
>For my test application TCBSENV is 0.
>I get a S0C4 when I do attempt to replace ASXBSENV despite being authorized
>and in supervisor mode. It feels like there is a RACROUTE macro or
93 matches
Mail list logo