Hi,
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The extension is not selectable in the installer, but if you click on
it you'll get Requires Python 2.5 and PyGTK+ installed.
This should be included in the installer, if possible. There should be a
single GIMP installer that
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:13:39PM -0600, Alex Feldman wrote:
Hi,
I have limited experience with Gimp, almost all of it with photographs,
and essentially none with Inkscape. I want to make some simple maps of
trails in the area, and mark them with mileages and a few comments. My
plan
Hi,
Alex Feldman a écrit :
Hi,
I have limited experience with Gimp, almost all of it with photographs,
and essentially none with Inkscape. I want to make some simple maps of
trails in the area, and mark them with mileages and a few comments. My
plan was to download the photographs of the
Alex Feldman writes:
I have limited experience with Gimp, almost all of it with photographs,
and essentially none with Inkscape. I want to make some simple maps of
trails in the area, and mark them with mileages and a few comments. My
plan was to download the photographs of the area from
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi!
But, why do you need a Gimp plugin for that? There are plenty of
graphical frontends for Subversion in case you don't like the command
line.
I think what he meant was a way to view previous images or differences
between
various images by interfacing with
On Mon 05-Mar-2007 at 10:59 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: Bernhard D Rohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has anybody ever thought about using Gimp with Subversion? I'd love a
module that allows me to make sense of my edited versions of an image.
Another, different approach could be to save
Von: Bernhard D Rohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has anybody ever thought about using Gimp with Subversion? I'd love a
module that allows me to make sense of my edited versions of an image. I
couldn't find a plugin though :(
There has been a - rather abstract - suggestion of image versioning,
Hi!
On Monday 05 March 2007, Matthias Julius wrote:
Bernhard D Rohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anybody ever thought about using Gimp with Subversion? I'd love a
module that allows me to make sense of my edited versions of an image. I
couldn't find a plugin though :(
Subversion or
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 17:18 +, David Marrs wrote:
The FAQ had a few cobwebs in it so I gave it a dust. It should feel more
up-to-date now and actually relevant to version 2.2.
Thanks for your help. But it would probably help if you could give a
pointer, or even a link, to which FAQ
Sven Neumann wrote:
Thanks for your help. But it would probably help if you could give a
pointer, or even a link, to which FAQ you are talking about.
Sven
oh yeah..
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/UserFaq
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Bernhard D Rohrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
has anybody ever thought about using Gimp with Subversion? I'd love a
module that allows me to make sense of my edited versions of an image. I
couldn't find a plugin though :(
Subversion or most other revision control systems are optimized for
It's the same in Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy) -
Gutenprint is described as gimp-print version 5.0.0-2ubuntu2. Note
that there is a seperate cupsys driver for it at the same version level
Matthias Julius wrote:
Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And still, when I select to print from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anthony,
gimp-app.sf.net is an excellent source to grep a prebuild an
prepackaged version of the most recent stable version of GIMP.
To get hands on an unstable version is a bit more complicated. I'm
running one on OS X, build with an
Thanks, I switched to the darwin ports version and got 2.3.14 installed :)
The fink version crashed when I tried to use the text toolplus it
was an older version.
Axel Wernicke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anthony,
gimp-app.sf.net is an excellent source to
One thing I can't seem to do is create an alias on the Dock in OSX that
will open gimp-2.3
Axel Wernicke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Anthony,
gimp-app.sf.net is an excellent source to grep a prebuild an
prepackaged version of the most recent stable version of
Matthias,
Thank you for responding.
In another thread, I was trying to be helpful to another user who was
asking questions about GIMP-shop. I learned in that thread that
GIMP-Shop is more than merely a skin or wrapper, but a different branch
of development.
So it occurred to me that maybe
On Monday 26 February 2007 07:06, Gregor Reich wrote:
Hi all
I've got a problem using gimp 2.2.11 on Ubuntu 6.06 (Gnome 2.14.3):
when I try to open a file, (File Open), I don't have access to my
SMB shares (they are not listed in the box on the left hand side of
the file opener as they are
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 12:18 +0900, Dave M G wrote:
And as I mentioned, I had already installed Gutenprint from within the
Ubuntu repositories.
You installed the Gutenprint printer drivers, but not the GIMP plug-in
that uses them.
But just to be sure, I went to the Gutenprint project
Hi,
GIMP 2.3 has support for accessing files on SBM shares over gnome-vfs.
It's somewhat hackish as it uses temporary files in order to avoid
having to rewrite all file plug-ins. But in general, it works just fine.
As soon as the long-awaited new file system abstraction layer makes its
way into
Dave M G [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And still, when I select to print from within GIMP, it and click the
button that says About, it says I'm using GIMP-Print 4.2.
So, as far as I can tell, I've done everything to install Gutenprint on
my system, but GIMP isn't giving me any indication that
Dave M G wrote:
So my question remains:
How do I get GIMP to use the Gutenprint plug in that I have installed?
(Actually, my real question is, Why does GIMP, and only GIMP, need to
use an entirely different set of printer drivers all it's own when every
other application seems to be
Toby, Sven, Matthias,
Thank you all for responding.
Toby Haynes wrote:
Open System-Synaptic and search Names and Descriptions for
Gutenprint. You should see, amongst the other entries,
gimp-print-5.0.0-2ubuntu2 or similar. That is what you need to install.
What I have installed is:
Sven,
Thank you for responding.
It uses whatever print plug-in you installed. If you want to use the
gutenprint plug-in, then get the GIMP plug-in from the gutenprint
project. I think I already mentioned that.
And as I mentioned, I had already installed Gutenprint from within the
Ubuntu
Dave M G wrote:
Akkana,
Thanks for responding.
ut the experts who would know for sure aren't here;
they're on the gimp-print/gutenprint devel list.
No one on the GIMP mailing list knows how to make GIMP connect to the
right printer driver?
In the past I've moved my Gimp
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 10:56 +0900, Dave M G wrote:
It says I'm using Gimp-Print version 4.2.
However, when I check Gimp-Print with apt-get/Synaptic, it says I have
version 5.0.0-2ubuntu2. In the description of the package, it says This
is Gutenprint version 5.0.0, a stable release in
I also have had a problem printing from Gimp. I attempted to print an image
and for my efforts I received a floor full of paper, some completely blank,
others with a line of garbage at the top of the page. I printed the same
image by displaying it in firefox and used its print feature.
I never
I'll have to try again. Since then I've changed from SuSE to Centos for
other reasons.
Jim.
On 2/23/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it would help a lot of you would tell us what Print plug-in you are
using. If things don't work, the reason might be that you are using the
old
Sven,
Thanks for responding.
it would help a lot of you would tell us what Print plug-in you are
using.
It says I'm using Gimp-Print version 4.2.
However, when I check Gimp-Print with apt-get/Synaptic, it says I have
version 5.0.0-2ubuntu2. In the description of the package, it says This
Dave M G writes:
(On a side note, when I scan my installed packages, I don't even see
Gimp-Print 4.2. It seems like I *only* have Gutenprint 5.0 installed. So
why is GIMP saying, in the About button in the print interface) that
I'm using 4.2?
It might be that your GIMP is including an old
Akkana,
Thanks for responding.
ut the experts who would know for sure aren't here;
they're on the gimp-print/gutenprint devel list.
No one on the GIMP mailing list knows how to make GIMP connect to the
right printer driver?
Just to be clear here, my printer is working (with CUPS, anyway),
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:52 +0200, Paul Surgeon wrote:
I have to touch up hundreds of aerial photos and it's a PITA to have to save
and then reapply the projection every time I save an image in GIMP.
We would accept a patch that changes the TIFF plug-in so that geographic
tags are
scott s. wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Ok so let's throw the tags away.
Is there anyway to get GIMP to use libgeotiff instead of libtiff?
libgeotiff is built on top of libtiff.
I have to touch up hundreds of aerial photos and it's a PITA to have to save
and then reapply the projection
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Is there some way to tell GIMP to preserve TIFF tags even if they're not
known?
If not can I file this as a bug? Tags shouldn't just be thrown away.
Paul
Hi Paul,
To complement Sven's reply, I would just add that the TIFF
specification, section 7, page 26, recommends
On Monday 12 February 2007 10:36, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
To complement Sven's reply, I would just add that the TIFF
specification, section 7, page 26, recommends that TIFF editors
(applications that modify TIFF files) discards tags/fields/IFD they do
not understand. To be more precise, the
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Ok so let's throw the tags away.
Is there anyway to get GIMP to use libgeotiff instead of libtiff?
libgeotiff is built on top of libtiff.
I have to touch up hundreds of aerial photos and it's a PITA to have to save
and then reapply the projection every time I save an
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 20:47 +0200, Paul Surgeon wrote:
Is there some way to tell GIMP to preserve TIFF tags even if they're not
known?
If not can I file this as a bug? Tags shouldn't just be thrown away.
Who says so? Can you point me to the part of the TIFF spec that defines
how
Mega Sunny wrote:
I can't print any picture with Gimp 2.2.13 (Gimp-Print Version 4.2).
My Distri is openSuse 10.2 and the normal installation of my Printer
(Epson Stylus Photo RX500) with yast works fine. Other programms can
print, only gimp don't work. Where is the problem? I also bought
Hi Jose,
could you please stop posting the digest to the list. You also did that
last week. And no, it's not funny.
Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
J Rodz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:00:03
To:gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Gimp-user Digest, Vol 52, Issue 13
Send Gimp-user mailing list submissions to
gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the
On Fri, 2006-22-12 at 21:11 -0800, I really do think we need to find a
better, less offensive name for GIMP,
and the sooner the better, so that we can put energy into supporting it,
and doing whatever we can to extend it's use instead of periodically having
this disagreement.
Yes *points
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 16:33 -0500, jbaker wrote:
I'm wanting to do a script that requires a more complicated GUI than
what the standard way of doing a script provides...
Basically I want to be able to layout some of the widgets horizontally
instead of stacked vertically...
What
On 12/22/06, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As earlier threads have already pointed out, most non-American English
speakers don't know this use of the word; and in a comprehensive
dictionary like the Oxford English dictionary, it's noted as a
specifically North American usage.
FWIW most speakers
dont worry.
be happy.
just press the delete button.
Robert Smits wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:39, lists wrote:
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I
Trapper wrote:
Most English speakers
generally relate gimp to the slang variant, most of us are familiar with
it and most of us consider it to be something negative.
Can I just change that to most American English speakers? I learnt the
meaning
of the slang word gimp while reading a
Trapper wrote:
snip
1. Gimp means to walk with a limp in English and is slang. ... Most
English speakers
generally relate gimp to the slang variant, most of us are familiar with
it and most of us consider it to be something negative.
snip
It would be very nice if people looked
jim wrote:
Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to show
up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting topic?
Summary to date: Noobs keep
On Friday 22 December 2006 19:33, jbaker wrote:
I'm wanting to do a script that requires a more complicated GUI
than what the standard way of doing a script provides...
Basically I want to be able to layout some of the widgets
horizontally instead of stacked vertically...
What would be the
On Thursday 21 December 2006 23:51, Robert Smits wrote:
Oh wait, Geoffrey says Get over it. Everybody with an opinion or
actual relevent facts, forget it. Geoffrey said so.
If you'll check the bloody archives, you'll see this same subject has
been discussed ad nauseam more then once.
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:44, jim wrote:
Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to
show up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting topic?
On Thursday 21 December 2006 21:06, Tom Williams wrote:
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and
/rotflmao :-) lol/
Brendan wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 21:06, Tom Williams wrote:
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:25:35AM -0600, Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to show
up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting topic?
Other
Brendan wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:44, jim wrote:
Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to
show up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting
I should also mention that this sort of thing comes up on the freebsd
lists periodically. If you'd only change the mascot and drop the whole
daemon thing, my church/tiny business would decide to use your
operating system. Maybe something cute like a penguin or a kitty waving
it's paw?
(the
Looking into different English-Russian dictionaries (the most
comprehensive ones) I can see the meaning of the word gimp, being
discussed here, as the 3-rd or 6-th in the order of usage frequency.
Others are (synonyms)
1. galloon, braid
2. spirit, vim
3. may be limp, may be neckerchief
4.
Luca de Alfaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- support for color profiles (.icc profiles - how are you going to
profile a printer otherwise?)
One thing I never understood is:
Why do applications have to deal with color profiles?
Color profiles are hardware device specific and at least in the
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and then name
Speaking about Gimpression, it could be taken as a copy of the MS
Expression at the time being. I think it is a great name, but people
tend to exaggerate when it comes to stealing.
What? No. Gimpression would NOT be confused with that. I think it's a great
name.
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
* Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-21-06 21:10]:
For example, Sarasota County Area Transit is a name of a transit
agency and its acronym is rather interesting. :)
Ella would agree, rest her sole.
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
On Thursday 21 December 2006 17:39, lists wrote:
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to show up
on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize this
thread on this exhausting topic?
EP
___
Gimp-user mailing
On 12/20/06, Gerry JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. Some time ago, the Gimp stopped responding to my mouse in the image
window. In other windows and on menus the mouse works fine (ie I can
select
brushes and such and use the interface without problems), but in the image
window (or more
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:48:06 +0100, Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just curious, have you tried using different tools and get the same
result?
Yes. I've tried all the tools, none of them works using the mouse. The
image
area just doesn't register anything at all. I can't
For a class, I don't know, but for serious photo work, Photoshop is
incredibly more advanced.
Some exampes:
Color:
- support for more than 8 bits/color/pixel (my scanners have 16)
- support for color profiles (.icc profiles - how are you going to
profile a printer otherwise?)
- support for color
I, for one, don't believe that open source projects should necessarily
avoid slang words. Gimp is a relatively obscure slang word. Let me
define this: most English speakers speak English as a second language,
and i bet 99% of them are not familiar with the unofficial uses of the
word Gimp. From
On 12/19/06, Toby Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
Anyway, instead of flaming, how about some suggestions:
Gimpressive
Gimpression
Out of all the many suggested (re)names, these two are the only two I've
ever seen and liked. Maybe because many GNU and GNOME
I tried both, but since I'm using GIMP all the time i foundthe
photoshop interface mostly chaotic. But I'm sure it must be the same
for people who pass from PS to GIMP. Most people are complaining about
the amount of windows the GIMP opens, but then virtual desktops handle
this problem with
On 12/17/06, Tom Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gowers wrote:
On 12/18/06, *Leon Brooks* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Olivier Lecarme wrote:
Here is my own modest grain of salt in the discussion:
I have been teaching Gimp to first-year university students for more
than six years, to one or two hundreds students every year. I have
never encountered any specific criticism among them about Gimp's GUI.
More, I
On 12/18/06, Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring out The Gimp
How many people do you really think have seen that movie? For example,
English is my native language, and I've never heard this movie reference
until it was brought up repeatedly on this mailing list -- this is the
On 12/18/06, David Gowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/18/06, Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring out The Gimp
How many people do you really think have seen that movie? For example,
English is my native language, and I've never heard this movie reference
until it was
On 12/18/06, Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:01:59 -0800
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you sell that to a corporation? How do you market that? The
people in business suits are going to
* Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-18-06 21:22]:
drives me crazy.
well, you said he used windoz!
--
Patrick ShanahanRegistered Linux User #207535
http://wahoo.no-ip.org@ http://counter.li.org
HOG # US1244711 Photo Album:
FWIW, I'm truly sorry for posting *anything* related to this thread,
and especially for the nasty tone. I should know better.
Chris
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Ok, that was too much. I wanted to send you a mail last time already,
but I assumed that you did this accidentally. Obviously you didn't. So
please, when posting to this list, try not to use HTML mail. And if you
absolutely can't turn HTML mail off in your mail client, then at least
don't fiddle
Here is my own modest grain of salt in the discussion:
I have been teaching Gimp to first-year university students for more
than six years, to one or two hundreds students every year. I have
never encountered any specific criticism among them about Gimp's GUI.
More, I cannot understand what seems
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 14:23 +0100, Olivier Lecarme wrote:
Here is my own modest grain of salt in the discussion:
snip
Somebody in this list said that teachers have the duty to teach what is
an industry standard. My own strong opinion is that one of my duties as
a university teacher is to
On 12/17/06, norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 14:23 +0100, Olivier Lecarme wrote:
Here is my own modest grain of salt in the discussion:
snip
Somebody in this list said that teachers have the duty to teach what is
an industry standard. My own strong opinion is
Anthony Ettinger wrote:
On 12/17/06, norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 14:23 +0100, Olivier Lecarme wrote:
Here is my own modest grain of salt in the discussion:
snip
Somebody in this list said that teachers have the duty to teach what is
an industry standard. My own
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and then name it after a slang word for a disabled person. How
do you sell that to a
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and then name it after a slang word for a disabled person. How
do
That 4% needs to be weighed against the proportion of people who use
image manipulation programs. A much higher percentage of United
States residents edit digital photographs than Nigerian citizens, for
example.
Personally, I would name it after a famous painting or painter so that
people would
On 12/17/06, Carter castor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and then name it after a slang word
John Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would
put so much time and hard work into creating a program as
professional as GIMP and then name it after a slang
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
isn't how people acquire Gimp.
Today.
What about in 3 years' time?
Cheers; Leon
___
Gimp-user
On 12/17/06, Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
isn't how people acquire Gimp.
Today.
What about in 3 years' time?
I still don't see it
On 12/18/06, Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
isn't how people acquire Gimp.
Today.
What about in 3 years' time?
I like the proposed
David Gowers wrote:
On 12/18/06, *Leon Brooks* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Ettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may have a point given 2 software boxes on a shelf,
Photoshop is more descriptive than Gimp - But that
Im using Windows XP Media Edition. By not working I mean it doesn't show up.
The one I was asking about I got to work someone from another Gimp mailing list
helped me. But thanks for trying.
Katie wrote:
I have a font called evanescent (it is a true type font and it is
text)
that won't work
John R. Culleton wrote:
ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of
upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp
as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much
of which I am not technically competent to
On 12/16/06, Andrew Swinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John R. Culleton wrote:
ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of
upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp
as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long
John R. Culleton wrote:
ON another list someone was complaining about the expense nad bother of
upgrading to the latest Photoshop, including licenses etc. I suggested Gimp
as a no cost/no fuss alternative for students. I received a long reply, much
of which I am not technically competent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribe:
i have installed gimp 2.2.13 on windows xp and when i start program i have the
messages that my installation is incomplete.
the opening of file program
files\gimp\gimp-2.0\share\gimp\2.0\menus\toolbox-menu.xml as failed and idem
for ...\menus\image-menu.xml. why ?
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 00:40, Leon Brooks wrote:
Has anyone read /GIMP 2 for Photographers/ yet?
There's a review up at:
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS5105451578.html
I'd value your opinion, if you've formed one. Particularly if you're
a photographer of any sort.
Chris Mohler a écrit :
Are you *sure* you're running X11?
IIRC, It was on the developer tools CD in Jaguar. It's also a free
download from the Apple Dev site. On my machine, it's under
ApplicationsUtilitiesX11, and has to be running before I launch any
X apps.
Chris
Strange behavior, my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 04.11.2006 um 10:46 schrieb Julien Pons:
Chris Mohler a écrit :
Are you *sure* you're running X11?
IIRC, It was on the developer tools CD in Jaguar. It's also a free
download from the Apple Dev site. On my machine, it's under
Strange behavior, my gimp.app automatically launch X11 :)
Can't remember how i set up this !
OK - I've never tried GIMP on OSX, but I have had trouble calling X11
apps w/o running X11 in the past. Still, it may not be installed - I
don't think it was installed by default in 10.3...
Roger -
Hi, Chris, er, Dog, er, Dude, er...
Can you say huh? I'm afraid that's about where I am at the moment (and
no, I'm not trying to be abnormally flippant; I'm just really, really
confused here). I think you got the e-mail I sent from my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address (at least, this MIGHT be a
601 - 700 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
