raise SCMError(errmsg)
SCMError: cvs [checkout aborted]: Absolute module reference invalid: `/
usr/local/cvsroot/WorldWind/src/gov/nasa/worldwind/Version.ja
va'
On Sep 26, 4:05 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> It's entirely possible that that error is misleading.
The cvs command issued by post-review executes, but post-review
doesn't seem to think there are any diffs to upload. I'll include the
result of post-review --output-diff --debug at the end of this message
Although I have a software background it has been a long time since
I've done any sort of sys
ow to get post-review to work with rbtools git?
(Also, I hate using actual mail for mailing lists ;-), anyone mind if I
ask gmane to carry reviewbo...@?)
--
Matthew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
&q
That's not NNTP :-). (IMO HTTP interfaces are even worse than mail. /me
laments underappreciated NNTP which is still by far the best interface
for discussion lists.)
--
Matthew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
no
> trouble rebasing your patch until it gets accepted!
True :-). (Actually, the patch still applied cleanly, sans needing to
type manually the name of the file to patch, since "post-review" is now
named "postreview.py". Alas, Review Board didn't see
just snag postreview.py and make sure everyone has a copy.)
--
Matthew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
T
dows machine, I think it
should work. Obviously, you'll also need Python :-).
--
Matthew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewb
Is libmemcache/cmemcache still needed, or is RB using some other way to
talk to memcached? I wonder because the latest "rc2" of libmemcache is
almost three years old.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy us
On 2009-12-03 15:59, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Is libmemcache/cmemcache still needed, or is RB using some other way to
> talk to memcached? I wonder because the latest "rc2" of libmemcache is
> almost three years old.
So... apparently python-memcached suffices. At least, I got
.
I use this frequently when I have vcs:r1 == a bunch of whitespace
changes and vcs:r2 == interesting changes. Note that you can assign the
review initially to a dummy user to avoid spamming everyone when you
incrementally upload+publish diffs.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board
On 2010-02-04 18:15, Stodge wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:21 pm, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2010-02-04 10:13, Stodge wrote:
[...] we need to be able to group multiple revisions on one review.
Is this possible with RB?
You could upload the diff of the first revision, publish it, upload the
cumulative
peruser. Is
there a permission to prevent that?
I'm using RB 1.0.5.1.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To un
ynonymous. I guess I should bug
Django about it?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this
uot;
Well, various sources say I can do that for lighttpd with logrotate and
'service lighttpd reload'. But will that work for Review Board's log?
What is the proper way to rotate Review Board's log file?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
On 2010-04-14 12:42, Jan Koprowski wrote:
On Apr 14, 7:05 pm, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
So, while wondering why a request was taking a while to post, I was
poking around for the logs, and noticed that the lighttpd log had grown
to over 240 MiB. "Okay," I said to myself, "I need t
ble. (Maybe I will even take a look at what would be required...)
For now I may just deal with the lighttpd restart, maybe I'll use weekly
instead of daily rotation to minimize disruption.
Thanks for the useful info.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
re how one achieves that? Or does that mean it
is safe to just move the log file and RB will notice and adjust?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard
sy_install RBTools". See
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools#installation-instructions .
Hope that helps.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~---
ly. Thanks for this improvement!
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
guide for Linux seems to pretty indicate that PyLucene
must be installed, then search must be enabled via the admin page,
followed by setting up a cron job.
What is my next step for debugging this problem?
Thanks for any help you can provide,
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project
David - yes, running in apache, and have executed several restarts of
httpd after the install of pylucene. The restarts were related to
other configuration items though, such as enabling SSL.
Thanks,
Matthew
On Jul 28, 12:33 pm, David Trowbridge wrote:
> Are you running in apache? Have
Hey,
We just upgraded ReviewBoard, and I see there are now method names
shown even when that part of the file is hidden.
It is brilliant. I love you all.
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http
I think that this is similar to a problem that I've come across, or might
be the same tbh. :)
I had all sorts of issues as we're both using a perforce proxy and
reviewboard at a remote location so had to do some fiddling to get it all
to work, both configuring reviewboard, and poking ssh tunnels
I'm trying to post a review request for a changeset I created on a new
branch of our public github repo. Since I already committed the change, I
enter:
$ post-review --parent 5f7fc000274abab9cbfb7a00a5b9602314ae6268
I'm getting the dreaded 207 (the file was not found in the repository)
error.
chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Matthew Gertner
> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to post a review request for a changeset I created on a new
>> branch of our public git
BTW, I just tried uploading the diff manually (no parent diff) and I get
exactly the same error message about the file not being in the repo. The
only thing I can think of is perhaps their are some Windows line endings in
the file. Would that bother RB?
--
Want to help the Review Board project
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 8:34:41 AM UTC+2, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Which version of RB though? This is important as GitHub made some major
> changes recently that are only compatible with the latest 1.6.x releases.
>
> Christian
>
>
Aha, we're still on 1.6.4.1. I'll ask our sysadmin to upd
e the
user's credentials. Is that correct?
Thanks
-Matthew
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users
I installed ReviewBoard yesterday on CentOS 7 with the command 'yum install
ReviewBoard'. We got it working by making all files owned by apache.
Today, I updated the software through easy_install and manually
updated/upgraded my site and tried to tighten up the file permissions.
The problem
(especially with
working completion) would be ideal, but what we're doing now with gerrit
is requiring a machine-readable tag in the request description, so this
would be okay too.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user
checked and 'invite only' not checked.
Am I doing something wrong? Is there a permission somewhere that is not
set properly?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happ
eta.
Okay; good to know it is a known issue. Thanks.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this
have the same problem, except it is complaining about
extension/__init__.py. Help would be appreciated.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.o
If I create an issue on a request, and later realize it is not an issue,
is there no way for me (as the issue creator) to drop the issue?
If not, would it be possible to add this ability?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate
p.s. If you end up patching Gitlab yourself, what you need is basically
a URL that gives you the output of 'git show '. The path isn't
actually needed for git.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
clone the gitorious repo
for such a service (and at that point, you might as well keep the clone
where RB can talk to it directly).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.r
27;s for experimenting, read up on git's
'ls-tree' command. (Short form: 'git ls-tree
' will give you the list of blobs (files) with their
respective ID's in as of .)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewbo
ply returns.
That could mean the value is an empty string (it shouldn't be), or the
command failed.
What does 'git config core.bare; echo $?' say?
Note: what *should* happen is it echoes 'false' (unless run in a bare
repository, in which case it would echo 't
the same branch.
We would also like to record the SHA that was posted (mostly to be able
to verify when doing a merge that the branch hasn't changed) as well as
the name of the branch that was posted, but this needs server-side
changes of course.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Revie
I'm seeing this out of post-review:
post-review --revision-range=: --output-diff --debug
RBTools 0.4.1
Home = /home/matthew
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting https://manticore/api/info/
Using the new web API
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'merge-base', 'origin/m
?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
k that needs to be done to
refactor this code and clean it up. Would you mind filing a bug to help
us track this?
Sure.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.review
still get an error.
...looks reasonable. I would guess the Raw File URL is the issue.
(Have you checked the server's logs to see what it is trying to do?)
What about the id2 in the raw file URL mask - should I leave it as id2 or
should I use just id ?
This I don't know... whatever w
it has e.g. introduced a behavioral regression, but don't know what
specific code is the culprit. I think it makes sense for tracking
purposes to be able to open an issue describing the problem, rather than
just a review stating that a problem exists.
Thanks,
--
Matthew
--
Want to help t
On 2012-12-07 14:55, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Is it possible to create an issue for a review request without it
being associated with a code comment? (I don't see a way, but want
to check if I'm missing something before filing an e
ine 63, in run
self.run_command('build_media')
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/cmd.py", line 326, in run_command
self.distribution.run_command(command)
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py", line 972, in run_command
cmd_obj.run()
File &
not going to try to test it today, though; I don't have a
VM set up for a test install, so I don't plan on dropping the new build
in without at least a database backup in case something goes wrong, and
I don't expect to get to that immediately.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Rev
short term solution (longer term I would rather have the SHA
there). Another would be an RB extension to add a custom field. In the
latter case, does anyone have an example of doing this, both in terms of
the extension, and also how to retrieve the value from the server?
--
Matthew
--
Want to
olling the Fedora package that djblets 0.7.2 is
no longer sufficient for rc1. (I just rebuilt the RPM bumping the source
to 0.7.6 with no issue, so am using that; not sure what the actual
requirement is.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.revie
this in existing 'change request')
We're also going to want/need a few local fields, but not things that
would make sense for inclusion in RB proper.
Ability to view individual commit diffs in a multi-commit request would
be awesome (you probably know that already) but I expect
but is not
visible...
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboar
...)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
On 2012-11-08 19:53, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2012-10-11 00:43, kvr wrote:
I'm trying to generate an extension using extension_generator.py but
it is
throwing the following exception>
*jinja2.exceptions.TemplateNotFound:
extension/templates/extension/dashboard.html*
But actua
On 2012-12-15 14:13, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On Monday, October 31, 2011 10:45:15 AM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I've been trying to work out for some time now how to accomplish
patch-series in Git with Review Board. [...]
Modify post-review so that it will create an individual revi
the '+', and as I recall, I had to put it there.
I'm also on Fedora 18.)
p.s. Big thanks to Stephen for the packages!
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.review
s this a known issue? I feel like I remember hearing about something
similar on the list...
I'm on RB 1.7.1 upgraded from 1.7.0 rc1 from 1.7.0 beta 4; maybe I
missed a step upgrading?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate
httpd?)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
..
Thanks for the help (also thanks to Stephen, again, for the package...
sheesh, 0.7.7 didn't last long, did it? :-) ).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.review
before publishing and how to
publish it also. What is the work flow.
I'm having a similar issue. If you manage to create a working example,
PLEASE share it, as one is desperately needed for those of us that
aren't intimately familiar with RB's source.
--
Matthew
--
Want to
f we can't see the name of the request branch on the
web interface, but if we can get/set it through the API, I could at
least write a functional 'git rb merge'.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Le
anyway, but I'd stay
away from gerrit; it's interface is absolute rubbish compared to RB.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~
the
appropriate database backend, as well as any VCS or authentication
method in use; those are just the ones I'm using.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/
d the still-in-beta version
18 thereof, I'm happily doing likewise using Stephen's packages of RB 1.7.1.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.review
AIK. You
definitely don't need P4D (that's the server).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe
s! It will be good to get
some of the other fixes out (e.g. renames and disabling git copy config,
prompt on stderr, etc.).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/
ermission exception thrown.)
Am I missing something?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from thi
ation from local Git
repository
(Possibly) silly question... have you tried without the .git? (I would
have guessed that is not wanted, although I could be wrong.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3707/
(send mail when closing requests) would make 1.7.2... might I expect it
for 1.7.3?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users
he
'source' version and don't know how to recreate it from the 'compiled'
version.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~-
On 2013-01-19 22:34, Raja wrote:
Hi Matthew
It looks you also need "reviews.can_edit_reviewrequest" for this to done.
Just granting "can change status" seems to throw a permission denied error
when trying to check if the user can edit the request. The UI doesnt
reflect this
not
found at the specified path".
This sounds suspiciously like Jonathan's recent git troubles... is your
server using SELinux? If yes, have you checked your SELinux log for denials?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/don
de to discard the request.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send ema
... it's pretty easy; just get basic ssl
working and - if needed - disable regular http.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~---
revision 1.
Is this correct/expected? Known issue? I would have expected to see a
reverse of the changes to foo.cpp from revision 1.
(This is with RB 1.7.5. Also, the merge base between revisions 1 and 2
differs, which may be part of the trouble.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Boa
to find lines that were moved
with changes.
(There's lots of stuff - like this - that I'd actually love to work on
if I could justify doing it 'on the clock'...)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happ
On 2013-02-16 02:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Drifting even further off topic, have you ever given thought to using patience
diff in RB? (I've seen spots where it would have been an improvement... might
help with better moved-
ever, on Reviewboard, the branch of repo that is connected is
origin/master. Hence, Reviewboard, will not be able to patch and display
this diff.
I'm confused... do you mean that RB is not able to access origin/foo?
How do you have RB set up that it can only see a subset of what is on
origin?
as
you create a new request; just look at your address bar.
If you generically know that there exists a review request draft, the
best you will be able to do is list all requests, query the status of
each, and note any that are drafts.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Do
else you need to do.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
reviewboard+unsubscr
should get a dump of the file contents.
It sounds like your 'raw file URL' for your repository is not set
correctly. Make sure it is set to a template from which cgit will accept
a *blob ID* (not a commit ID) to retrieve a specific version of a file.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Revi
Does anyone have an RB extension that adds a custom field to a review
request, that they would be willing to share as an example of how to do
this?
(On a related note, am I missing something, or is the extra_data field
still not in 1.7.x?)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board
. I think we'd need
something more general that could have an extension for defining such
rules. I think it's separate work from the DVCS work.
This sounds like a good excuse to develop the extension system to allow
an extension to implement the logic. Probably this just nee
to talk to Review Board.
Is there a (CLI) way to get field information (e.g. description) from a
review request?
I need this for the merge command of my git-rb script.
Thanks,
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy us
or? If not please suggest your development
workflows.
Probably not, but why can you not just cd to the repository from which
you actually want to push changes, and then specify the path to your
modified post-review.py?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate toda
o use all major debug features such as stepping,
watching, etc. I am new in Python.
Does eclipse not allow you to specify the working directory when you run
the program for debugging?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy
y) less latency, and
less load on the server and network because it is event driven (the
server and network only need to do work when an event actually happens;
you aren't making them work every poll-interval just to tell you that
nothing has changed).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Bo
ultiple browser failures still sounds
to me more like a server problem.
While you're checking your browser console logs, it is probably worth
also checking the server logs if there is any message that would
indicate a problem generating the diffs.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review B
/js/reviews.min.8dcc237657b9.js:112
TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating
'RB.setFileAttachmentComments({
})')
...and indeed it seems there is something wrong with the page content.
Has anyone seen this before, or have an idea what might be wrong?
--
Matthew
en this started?
Unfortunately, no, just that I first noticed it about a week ago (and
given others are commenting, presumably it only affects some users of a
given RB instance).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let
.
In the meantime, go into My Account, uncheck the Open An Issue, save,
re-check, save. Should fix it.
That fixed it; thanks!
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboar
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If you entered a
passphrase when generating the key then I found ReviewBoard can't handle it.
Well... yeah. Where would RB store the pass-phrase? :-)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Boa
On 2013-05-02 06:36, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:35:18 PM UTC+1, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If
you entered a passphrase when generating the key then I found
ReviewBoard can't handle
if not it is (AFAICT) solely from a lack of glue. Between
RB's extensions and event system, you should be able - without much
difficulty - to write an RB extension to either publish events and/or
fire off automated regression tests and such.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board
Error: (1045, "Access denied for user
'admin'@'localhost' (using password: YES)") .Doesn't the 1.7.7.1 version
supports postgressql?
I'm using it :-).
More likely RB setup is not finding it. You are probably missing python
bindings for postgresql or some s
o force it to be rewritten.)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
r
local packages or download links found for ReviewBoard
error: Could not find suitable distribution for
Requirement.parse('ReviewBoard')
While it is probably desirable to fix this, is there a reason you are
not using Stephen's EPEL packaged version?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help th
out having to leave the
current request page). Even better would be to have a full-blown hover
element that would show the 'full' summary information (i.e. at least
summary and description).
Thoughts/Comments?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
htt
s easier because you aren't dealing with an existing
commit. In either case you are probably talking about separate
tools/extensions at least for git and svn, possibly even two different
ones for git (for pre- and post-commit review).
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board proje
h=' rather than 'hb=' with your gitweb
instance.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscr
The SHA is a good check
against mistakes, but not actively malicious users.)
Disclaimer: I read Allan's original post as offering to write something.
So take the above as encouragement that I believe that should be
possible, not complaint that the core RB team hasn't already done
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
