Dear Bruno,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 17:54, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 20:38, Stephen Paul King wrote:
You
Dear Bruno,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 21:26, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
You wrote:
Physics emerges from the FPI on UD*. It is an open question if there is
a winner program, but empirically we can bet
to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe
Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/19/2014 10:01 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Exactly, what about all the models of all the worlds that follow
different axioms? Those can possibly exist, thus they must. What is not
impossible, is compulsory!
Did you just make that up? :-)
Brent
--
You
:22 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/19/2014 10:01 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Exactly, what about all the models of all the worlds that follow
different axioms? Those can possibly exist, thus they must. What is not
impossible, is compulsory!
Did you just make that up
,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567
Dear Bruno,
Could you ever stop being obtuse?
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 21:01, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I think that you are setting up a false dichotomy with the notion of a
finite unique physical universe
an
actively computing reality in a present moment of p-time as the fundamental
level of reality.
Edgar
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:54:15 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Bruno Marchal mar...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan 2014, at 20:38, Stephen
I would like to promote this blog post and the comments on it.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6551
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Edgar,
LOL! You don't parse what I read very well... I have been saying that
block
by positing an
actively computing reality in a present moment of p-time as the fundamental
level of reality.
Edgar
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 11:54:15 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Bruno Marchal mar...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jan
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06:04 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
LOL! You don't parse what I read very well... I have been saying that
block time is a BS idea. Time is not like that at all. I have a model of
time that works great in physics, but not many know of it. BTW, I
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:29 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 January 2014 05:54, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Bruno,
I do not claim that UDA is flawed. I claim it is incomplete and based
on a false premise. The problem is the assumption
Dear LizR,
I know. I deserved that. It is just frustrating to explain something and
get a blank look in response.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 January 2014 05:26, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Bruno,
Could you ever stop
Yes, and friends that are teenagers in mental age.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:29 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 January 2014 11:16, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
I know. I deserved that. It is just frustrating to explain something
and get a blank
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:47 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 January 2014 10:52, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
To the contrary! Bruno seems to eschew the very idea of Becoming!
He appears to derive it from something static and eternal, hence
, but it would be freaking expensive and not last long.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 07:54:08PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear spudboy100,
As far as I know, no. It isn't possible to shift from one universe
:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 02:48:53PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dare Jason,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
wrote:
So why can't zombies have intentions? Remember the only thing zombies
supposedly lack is qualia. If a zombie is hungry and goes out
to me that it will be quite
possible to have a measure of a system that indicates self-awareness
(given sufficient time series data of its components).
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:10:42PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russel,
Can we detect self-modeling in our brains now? I have
).
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:10:42PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russel,
Can we detect self-modeling in our brains now? I have been doing some
research into Secure computation, trust me, my team is pretty sure that
we
can make computations look like noise on the network
Dear Brent,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:05 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/18/2014 1:09 AM, LizR wrote:
On 18 January 2014 19:51, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/17/2014 10:18 PM, LizR wrote:
On 18 January 2014 19:12, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Dear Russell,
I am soo happy, BTW, that you participate in this list!
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:08:04PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russell,
I would agree with you IFF the substitution level
+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:44 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 January 2014 16:28, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Brent,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:05 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Not so cotton-picking fast! Where is discussion
at 10:38:58PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russell,
I am soo happy, BTW, that you participate in this list!
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:08:04PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russell
email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:12:18PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russell,
I don't see the connection. How is self-modeling involved in the space
where the
system integrates the outputs of its
that indicates self-awareness
(given sufficient time series data of its components).
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:10:42PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Russel,
Can we detect self-modeling in our brains now? I have been doing some
research into Secure computation, trust me, my team is pretty
Dear Bruno,
I was not clear. Let me try again.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Jan 2014, at 15:18, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Let me first say that I share your opinion of physicalism!
My point is that it is the only opinion
to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http
Dear Bruno,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 16 Jan 2014, at 04:44, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
But stop and think of the implications of what even Bruno is saying. *Space
is completely a construction of our minds.* *There is no 3,1
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864
of this methodology will be
demonstrated using examples from probability theory, number theory,
geometry, information theory, and quantum mechanics.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Bruno,
You wrote:
Physics emerges from the FPI on UD
/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only
. A reality requires the ability to
coherently communicate between its observers.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:02 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 January 2014 11:39, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear John,
I invite your comment on a statement and question
/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may
to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
non-computable?
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may
to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only
this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any
Dear Jason,
I see a flaw in your argument.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 8:41 AM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
wrote:
Dear Jason,
Could you be more specific about why you are skeptical of p-zombies? I
:
Stephen,
What is this magical FPI that tells us in this present moment that there
is no such present moment? What's the actual supposed proof?
Edgar
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 10:17:31 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
The universality of the first person experience
Dear Jason,
Let's try to be a bit more formal. Interleaving.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.com
wrote:
Dear Jason,
I see a flaw in your argument.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014
...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Edgar,
I already wrote up one argument against the concept of a universal
present moment using the general covariance requirement of GR. Did you read
it? It is impossible to define
email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http
to any metrics...
Edgar
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:23:50 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
I would agree with your idea here if you made one change: replace the
single abstract computing space for all of space-time and replace it with
an abstract computing space for each
property
conservation laws and the laws that compute the binding forces of matter.
But am pleased to hear you agree with the rest, the general concept...
Edgar
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:23:50 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
I would agree with your idea here if you made
Dear Jason,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe...@provensecure.com wrote:
Dear Jason,
I do not think that block time is a coherent idea. It assumes
something impossible: that a unique
Der LizR,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:14 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I have a 2c worth on block time, too :)
On 17 January 2014 09:33, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Jason,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.comwrote
Parminedies. We then can define time in terms of orderings and measure of
that fundamental Becoming in a relatively local way.
Problem solved!
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Stephen Paul King
stephe
our entire existence within from birth to
death.
It's the most fundamental and persistent of observations...
Edgar
On Thursday, January 16, 2014 3:28:06 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Is P-time observable?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Edgar L. Owen edga
this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile
to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe
to
everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior
this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including
it, that's a
different train of thought.
Liz's repost has nothing to do with the argument I'm referencing. She
clearly doesn't know what it is.
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:21:35 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
Thank you for the repost!
Dear Edgar
through time at c in one direction, this conclusively
falsifies block time.
Thus SR conclusively falsifies block time. QED.
Best,
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:39:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/15/2014 2:54 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
� I will have to agree
in one direction, this conclusively
falsifies block time.
Thus SR conclusively falsifies block time. QED.
Best,
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 6:39:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 1/15/2014 2:54 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
� I will have to agree with LizR here. SR
consistent way to do it. But his
results disallow for the kind of concepts that Edgar and many others are
advocating.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:16 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/15/2014 3:21 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
Thank you for the repost!
Dear Edgar
, 2014 7:14:56 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Your argument is based on a disconception of what the speed of light
is! Light -photons- do not move at all. They are the null length rays
that connect events together. Nothing can travel faster than c because to
do so would
with my argument, other than that
you disagree with the conclusion?
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:21:31 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
There is no such thing as a location in time. The entire idea of a
dimension of time is a mental construct that we hang events
does not move??? Even your clock knows better than that! And you
think my theories are weird!
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:35:26 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bot,
Time does not move. Please alert your programer that your libraries of
responses are failing
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments
:48:02 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Time is not the movement of the hands or numbers of a clock, it is the
measure of the mapping between the positions of the hands. That is not
motion, it is something else. Time does not move.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Edgar L
on TV.
:-)
Edgar
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 7:55:09 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Bingo! You are correct. All motion in space-time is an illusion. The
ancient greeks figured that out already.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net
...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
of ideas
that are not even true.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 January 2014 13:55, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear Edgar,
Bingo! You are correct. All motion in space-time is an illusion. The
ancient greeks figured that out already
meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/15/2014 4:32 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Yes, GR assumes smooth Riemannian manifolds. The mapping works for them
wonderfully. That fact was proven by the people that discovered Fiber
Bundles. The hard thing to grasp is how the mapping between separable QM
:
On 1/15/2014 4:32 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Yes, GR assumes smooth Riemannian manifolds. The mapping works for them
wonderfully. That fact was proven by the people that discovered Fiber
Bundles. The hard thing to grasp is how the mapping between separable QM
systems and the infinitesimal
, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
of an observer. If only we could see
eye to eye on the definitions of some other concepts... Such as that
Computation is an *action* or transformation, not a static being.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:22 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 January 2014 16:19, Stephen Paul King stephe
Dear LizR,
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 January 2014 16:44, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
But stop and think of the implications of what even Bruno is saying.
*Space
is completely a construction of our minds
an email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul
this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any
it
be?
I dropped the idea that reality is physical and dimensional long ago. I
learned detailed knowledge of QM and GR...
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 9:08:53 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
Several of us do not understand what you mean by pure abstract
, January 13, 2014 12:25:54 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Edgar L. Owen edga...@att.net wrote:
Stephen,
It's not 'ideal monism'. Trying to shoehorn it won't help you understand
it.
Good point! I tend to have a 5 bin system that I use
outside of the New Age. For a hard science take, I
recommend Russell Standish's *A theory of Nothing
http://www.hpcoders.com.au/nothing.html*.
I am far too ADHD to write a publishable book
Edgar
On Monday, January 13, 2014 12:52:42 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Edgar
options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual
-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us
Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public
,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is non-public, proprietary
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only
-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior
.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10 Jan 2014, at 23:23, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Brent,
Vaughn Pratt's dualist theory is consistent with QM and does show a
mechanism that prohibits White Rabbits. It is intelligible to anyone that
puts
Dear LizR,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 5:01 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 January 2014 20:56, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Der Bruno,
The UD has no output. I guess you think to the trace of the UD, UD*,
which from the first person perspective is entirely given
AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Jan 2014, at 06:05, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Brent,
I will try a crude summary and hope to not be misunderstood... It starts
with the Stone duality, a well known isomorphism between Boolean algebras
and totally disconnected compact
Dear Friends,
I highly recommend Louis H. Kauffman's new blog. His latest post speaks
to the Becoming interpretation of mathematics that I advocate:
http://kauffman2013.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/is-mathematics-real/
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
--
You received this message
/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only
Dear Brent,
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 6:08 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:43 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
You wrote:
AR provides the neutral monism!
Comp is neutral monism. Neither mind, nor matter are taken as primitive.
Both emerge from
://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed
Dear LizR,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:00 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 January 2014 14:52, Stephen Paul King stephe...@provensecure.comwrote:
Dear LizR,
That is the claim and I show that it is false. A class that has a
particular set of properties and not the rest
://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Kindest Regards,
Stephen Paul King
Senior Researcher
Mobile: (864) 567-3099
stephe...@provensecure.com
http://www.provensecure.us/
“This message (including any attachments
. We get Nothingness either way. My claim is that arithmetic is
not Nothing thus it is not neutral and cannot be the foundation of a
neutral monism.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 2:00 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 1/11/2014 9:33 PM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear LizR,
On Sun, Jan 12
201 - 300 of 937 matches
Mail list logo
