On 2009-08-24 00:26, Christian Hammond wrote:
> We've just moved Review Board and RBTools over to Git, hosting on
> http://github.com/reviewboard/.
Ironically, post-review no longer works:
"Error uploading diff: The file was not found in the repository (207)"
Anyone know how to get post-review t
On 2009-09-09 15:15, Christian Hammond wrote:
> What version of post-review are you using?
Ah... that's a good question...
/me retries with 'rbtools/postreview.py'
/me feel embarrassed now :-)
(That said, maybe I wouldn't be using esoteric versions if someone would
commit 804/1031 :P.)
> For
On 2009-09-10 17:45, Dan Savilonis wrote:
>> That's not NNTP :-). (IMO HTTP interfaces are even worse than mail. /me
>> laments underappreciated NNTP which is still by far the best interface
>> for discussion lists.)
>
> Sounds like you'd be happiest in an IRC client.
Um... you are joking, right?
On 2009-09-15 18:07, Kunjal wrote:
> We already have RB integrated with Perforce and it is working cool.
> Now, we have some developers working in GIT and we want to review that
> code as well.
> What are the steps developer should perform to get the diff and post
> the review?
Save yourself a wh
(Inline quoting is preferred, thanks!)
On 2009-09-16 10:57, Kunjal wrote:
> so, the post-review script will work as is in Red-Hat linux
> environment?
If the Python deps are met, it should. In my environment I have a
local-built copy of Python (with the needed modules, though I think it
is jus
Is libmemcache/cmemcache still needed, or is RB using some other way to
talk to memcached? I wonder because the latest "rc2" of libmemcache is
almost three years old.
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us kn
On 2009-12-03 15:59, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Is libmemcache/cmemcache still needed, or is RB using some other way to
> talk to memcached? I wonder because the latest "rc2" of libmemcache is
> almost three years old.
So... apparently python-memcached suffices. At least, I got
On 2010-02-04 10:13, Stodge wrote:
Am I right in thinking that a review can only refer to a single diff
(where a diff may contain multiple changesets/revisions)? And
uploading a new diff will replace the existing one with a newer
version?
Yes.
If my understanding is right, we need to be able
On 2010-02-04 18:15, Stodge wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:21 pm, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2010-02-04 10:13, Stodge wrote:
[...] we need to be able to group multiple revisions on one review.
Is this possible with RB?
You could upload the diff of the first revision, publish it, upload the
cumulative
I noticed something surprising today. Besides my RB "root" account, I
have my personal account set up with "staff" permissions (so I and
others can e.g. add users without using the superuser account), but
apparently this power includes the ability to make anyone superuser. Is
there a permission
On 2010-03-10 15:07, Christian Hammond wrote:
Staff means you have the ability to create/delete/modify anything in the
database that you have permissions for (by default, this is everything, I
believe). Superuser means you have it no matter what permissions are set.
You basically have every singl
So, while wondering why a request was taking a while to post, I was
poking around for the logs, and noticed that the lighttpd log had grown
to over 240 MiB. "Okay," I said to myself, "I need to put a stop to
this. This really should be rotated out and the old stuff discarded."
Well, various so
On 2010-04-14 12:42, Jan Koprowski wrote:
On Apr 14, 7:05 pm, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
So, while wondering why a request was taking a while to post, I was
poking around for the logs, and noticed that the lighttpd log had grown
to over 240 MiB. "Okay," I said to myself, "I need t
Okay, it looks like Python 2.6 provides a logging handler we can use for
this -- WatchedFileHandler. It checks to see if the file has been
moved/renamed/deleted and then reopens. It's intended for use with logrotate
and such.
A couple caveats. First, it's only in Python 2.6. We can look into whet
On 2010-05-12 03:13, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just put out the 1.0.8 release, which has some fixes for rendering issues
in the dashboard, and fixes a breakage when rotating the Review Board log
file.
As usual, more information on the news post (
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/20
On 2010-05-13 12:56, brewsterw wrote:
I've installed ReviewBoard and have it working under linux, but now
want to instal RBTools under windows so I can use post_review. I've
install Active Python and download the rbtools package, but am not
sure what to do next. I've looked at the documentation o
On 2010-05-17 13:23, Christian Hammond wrote:
[Rotating logfiles is] just simply safe now. Review Board uses a new
log handler that notices when the log file changes out from
underneath it.
Okay, that's what I guessed, since that's what I remember talked about
when I asked previously. Thanks f
I am looking into RB as an alternative to gerrit for code review, but
one of the thing we really want is the ability to include custom data in
review requests.
Will the new extension support in 1.7 allow adding additional,
site-defined fields, and if so, is there any documentation/example how
I'm trying out 1.7 beta 2, and I'm noticing that I don't seem to be able
to join any review groups. I click a group and then click 'save
settings', but when I reload the page, the group is unchecked again.
(Also, looking at the group in admin, I can see that my user does not
get added as a memb
On 2012-11-08 14:26, Christian Hammond wrote:
There are some regressions in 1.7 beta 2. The reason we haven't put out
beta 3 yet is that we've hit some strange memory leak on our server, and
aren't sure yet where it resides. Until we know more, we don't want to
release a beta.
Okay; good to kno
On 2012-10-11 00:43, kvr wrote:
I'm trying to generate an extension using extension_generator.py but it is
throwing the following exception>
*jinja2.exceptions.TemplateNotFound:
extension/templates/extension/dashboard.html*
But actually that template is present there.
Any hint?
I have the sam
If I create an issue on a request, and later realize it is not an issue,
is there no way for me (as the issue creator) to drop the issue?
If not, would it be possible to add this ability?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
H
On 2012-11-20 15:49, DXM wrote:
I'm trying to setup ReviewBoard to work with Gitlab repository. Since
Gitlab has a web front end API, From everything I've read so far, seems the
most straightforward integration would be to specify a Raw File URL mask in
the repository setup.
However, I've run in
On 2012-11-20 17:54, DXM wrote:
Thank you for the reply, guys. I wonder if I could just write my own
stand-alone service (listening on port 8080) that could sit on the gitlab
box and just serve up the output of 'git show..." command.
If you can run git against something that looks like a git ch
On 2012-11-30 04:11, Krishnan Raghupathi wrote:
I am using ReviewBoard version 1.6.1 and am facing a difficulty in
configuring this for our GIT repository. Our GIT repository is hosted on a
remote machine i.e different from the one hosting ReviewBoard. In the Add
repository of ReviewBoard, I se
On 2012-12-03 09:41, Paul Albertella wrote:
I'm getting a confusing error when I try to run post-review
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'config', 'core.bare']
I've tried running this command directly in the repository (a non-bare
clone) and it simply returns.
That could mean the value i
On 2012-12-04 04:54, Christian Hammond wrote:
In time, we'll have "rb post" or similar, which will be a better post-review.
I have already written such a thing (wrapping post-review)...
Mine is probably rather specific to our specific work flow, so I'm not
sure it would help you. I'm curious,
I'm seeing this out of post-review:
post-review --revision-range=: --output-diff --debug
RBTools 0.4.1
Home = /home/matthew
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting https://manticore/api/info/
Using the new web API
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'merge-base', 'origin/master',
'refs/heads/my-branch']
We have a somewhat odd setup where we have effectively a fork, using
git, of a project that uses svn. As a result, the correct repository for
our purposes (i.e. what RB knows about) is the git repo. For developers
that have only the git repo, this is okay, but for developers that have
the svn u
On 2012-12-05 19:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
When scanning for the right type of SCMTool for a repository, we ask
each SCMTool to try to provide information on the repository. If we can
get something useful out of it, we assume the tool is valid.
Makes sense.
The Git tool is asking for that
On 2012-12-07 00:08, Krishnan Raghupathi wrote:
I tried using the following value for the raw file URL mask -
http://gitgrid.unx.coep.com/cgit/Mobile/Commons/tree/Commons/formatters/Constants.cpp?id2=7d8cb5fa13a5985e70300baac4ae09d1be8c37bf
Based on that, I would guess your Raw File URL should
Is it possible to create an issue for a review request without it being
associated with a code comment? (I don't see a way, but want to check if
I'm missing something before filing an enhancement request.)
The use case I am thinking of is that I go to test a patch and discover
that it has e.g.
On 2012-12-07 14:55, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Is it possible to create an issue for a review request without it
being associated with a code comment? (I don't see a way, but want
to check if I'm missing something before filing an e
On 2012-12-07 22:56, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Derek,
1.7 RC makes use of a local lessc compiler.
I'm getting an error (see below) trying to build 1.7RC1... I'm guessing
this is the same problem (I am also trying to roll a Fedora package for
testing purposes).
I'd really like to be able
On 2012-12-12 15:34, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed 12 Dec 2012 03:30:09 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
If you have lessc locally, this will stop happening. Make sure you can
run that on the command line. I don't know if lessjs is something else
or not.
D'oh! Apparently I built, but neglect
In order to ease reviews and pushing request updates, I would like to
record the git branch name of a request, and retrieve it again via a
shell command. Has anyone done this? Can anyone offer any pointers?
Coaxing post-review into putting the branch name into the change number
would be a shor
Okay, it was a little rocky, but I managed to update my RB server. I
haven't poked it really hard yet, but the biggest issue I was having
(user can't join groups) seems fixed (thank you!). Rearranging columns
in the dashboard also now seems to be working.
@Stephen: be aware when rolling the Fe
On 2012-12-13 18:27, Christian Hammond wrote:
I think it'd make sense for post-review to be able to populate the branch
name with the nearest origin branch, which is the typical pattern. Not sure
about the local branch being used, though.
I've been using the existing 'branch' field as the merge
Am I going blind, or is the 'file raw url' missing in 1.7 rc1? Without
this, I cannot create a new repository for a non-local git repository :-(.
This is with konqueror using the (Qt) webkit renderer, and also firefox
17. I notice that the field appears to exist on the page, but is not
visible
On 2012-12-14 17:56, David Trowbridge wrote:
This is a known bug which has been fixed in git. It will ship with 1.7
final (hopefully this weekend).
Okay, thanks. (Whew :-).)
(Meanwhile, DOM inspector let me remove the troublesome CSS so that I
could fix my repository specification...)
--
Ma
On 2012-11-08 19:53, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2012-10-11 00:43, kvr wrote:
I'm trying to generate an extension using extension_generator.py but
it is
throwing the following exception>
*jinja2.exceptions.TemplateNotFound:
extension/templates/extension/dashboard.html*
But actua
On 2012-12-15 14:13, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On Monday, October 31, 2011 10:45:15 AM UTC-4, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I've been trying to work out for some time now how to accomplish
patch-series in Git with Review Board. [...]
Modify post-review so that it will create an individual revi
On 2012-12-21 08:37, pfee wrote:
I think my next issue is with ReviewBoard rather than Fedora.
The Apache configuration generated by rb-site includes this line:
Options -Indexes FollowSymLinks
This mixes options starting with +/- with those without a prefix. The
documentation for httpd 2.2 war
When I go to edit a review that contains comments made on code, it
doesn't seem to be working correctly. It appears at the bottom of the
page (not 'over' as expected), I get spinners that never go away where
the code should be, and I can't seem to actually edit anything.
Is this a known issue?
On 2012-12-21 16:23, Christian Hammond wrote:
There was a bug in Djblets that caused this. If you upgrade Djblets, this
should go away.
I upgraded to python-djblets-0.7.7-1.fc18.noarch when I upgraded RB to
1.7.1. Is that not recent enough? (Did I need to do a harder restart
than cycling htt
On 2012-12-21 18:59, Christian Hammond wrote:
It's 0.7.8 that has the fix, unfortunately. Guess you'll need to wait for an
official package, or either build your own or install the Python package using
easy_install.
Looks like Stephen built it already. Installed it, seems better...
Thanks fo
On 2012-12-25 23:36, maris wrote:
We want to customize the Review Board , by adding some additional fields
like project name in Review Details page. I am stuck after adding model for
the same. I would like to implement it as a drop down to select.
Please let me know, how to save it as a draft be
On 2012-12-26 14:56, Christian Hammond wrote:
I'm hoping to create a sample extension for this in time, but honestly, there's
work that still needs to be done for this. The extension support we added is
intended to be experimental and incomplete, and we'll be adding to it over
time. I imagine
On 2012-12-28 10:20, Klaim J. Lamotte wrote:
0. The context I would use this is:
- I'm working alone for now
- I have some friends who can help by reviewing the code
- until now I just gave them access to the source code but it's not
perfect to do reviews
In this context, is th
On 2013-01-04 04:07, p...@talk21.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
The following AVC denied errors occur:
You know... just FYI, now that you mention it, I remember I had to tweak
SELinux on my system... Specifically, I had to allow access to
postgresql, git and LDAP. (Probably need to do likewise for t
On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote:
Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found
bitnami review board but they only have 1.6
Otherwise, which distribution would result in the easiest install? Would
CentOS 6.3 work?
If you're willing to run non-LTS Fedora, and the st
On 2013-01-15 00:29, xiuruli...@163.com wrote:
1. Our Perforce server is at remote site and out of my control, I just want
to setup a locak ReviewBoard web server, to work together with our existing
Perforce server (at remote site) for a small team, is it possible? does
Review Board need to be at
On 2013-01-17 01:58, Christian Hammond wrote:
We'll have a new RBTools out pretty soon with some nice improvements as
well.
Will this include the new API bits? (If yes, may I nag someone about
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3733/? ;-) )
Either way... looking forward to it, and thanks! It w
I have given myself the 'review | review request | can change status'
permission, which has caused the 'close' button to appear for requests
that I don't own.
However, if I try to actually close a request, nothing happens. (If I
use 'rbt close', I get a permission exception thrown.)
Am I mis
On 2013-01-16 19:53, Jonathan Mastin wrote:
I'm having trouble when I go to the Add Repository webpage
http:///reviews/admin/db/scmtools/repository/add/ and choose to add
the path to my repository (/var/git/Intent/.git) and save changes, I get
the following error: Unable to retrieve information f
On 2013-01-17 01:58, Christian Hammond wrote:
Review Board 1.7.2 is out. Lots of bug fixes and a few new features. See
the news post and release notes for more info.
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2013/01/16/review-board-1-7-2-released/
Just realized... I was hoping http://reviews.reviewboard
On 2013-01-18 19:08, Jonathan Mastin wrote:
Solved. The server is running with SELinux "enforcing" and so the git
command couldn't be started by apache. The repository can be added by
disabling SELinux, or running the two below commands
audit2allow -a -M reviewboard
semodule -i reviewboard.pp
On 2013-01-19 22:34, Raja wrote:
Hi Matthew
It looks you also need "reviews.can_edit_reviewrequest" for this to done.
Just granting "can change status" seems to throw a permission denied error
when trying to check if the user can edit the request. The UI doesnt
reflect this, but the server log in
On 2013-01-21 12:42, Alex Edwards wrote:
I am still having trouble getting this to work, I am unsure what I am doing
differently to others. I started with rb 1.6 but couldn't get it working so
I thought I would have a go with rb 1.7.1 I reinstalled reviewboard and
rbtools. And I am still facing t
On 2013-01-23 02:48, Hyunil Shin wrote:
I will use post review (committed in Subversion).
While reviewing if I find a bug how can I indicate that a review has a bug?
I want to close the review with a kind of bug-tag.
for example, I need another close status, bug (currently two status -
submitted,
On 2013-01-25 08:25, Nilesh Jaiswal wrote:
We have reviewboard setup and working smoothly with http, but now due to
some security reason we need to configure https to access reviewboard.
I checked google knowledge base but could not find any useful.
Can you please help me with the steps i need
Let's say I upload a patch that changes two files: foo.cpp and bar.cpp,
and publish it. Now let's say I upload a new version of the patch that
only changes bar.cpp.
When I ask RB to show the diff between the two request versions, I see
changes to foo.cpp as if I was looking at revision 1.
Is
On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
Yes, this is "correct" in that this is how it's known to work. It's not ideal,
though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be improved, some easy to fix,
some harder. This might not be so bad, if someone wanted to take it on. (I won't b
On 2013-02-16 02:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Drifting even further off topic, have you ever given thought to using patience
diff in RB? (I've seen spots where it would have been an improvement... might
help with better moved-
On 2013-02-16 22:21, Christian Hammond wrote:
So it sounds like you need to make sure any diff you generate through egit is between
a range of ..HEAD.
To make that even more explicit... ANY diff, regardless how it is
generated, needs to be against something that RB can 'see'. Otherwise RB
wi
On 2013-02-20 12:31, chuck j wrote:
how to get review request id after successful posting of review request and
before publishing the review request.
Can you be more specific? How are you posting the review request? In
what form do you need the ID?
If you are writing a wrapper over post-revi
On 2013-02-22 01:20, chuck j wrote:
Yes i am using wrapper over post-review script. I am already using stdout
of post-review to get the review id. I wanted to know if there is any API
which will help me get the review id before publishing the review request?
which i can use in my wrapper.
I don
On 2013-02-25 11:54, age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
I am migrating from RB 1.6.3 on SQLite and local git repos to RB 1.7.5 on
PostgreSQL and remote git repos and cgit. I have successfully migrated the
data and reviewboard 1.7.5 is running, however, the diff viewer is broken.
It seems that RB
Does anyone have an RB extension that adds a custom field to a review
request, that they would be willing to share as an example of how to do
this?
(On a related note, am I missing something, or is the extra_data field
still not in 1.7.x?)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project
Detailed comments below, but summarizing my personal short term priorities:
1. Custom field support.
2. Support DVCS revision in the changenum field.
3. Add a field for local branch name.
Of course, (1) means that (3) (and (2), sort-of) can be done with an
extension... which is one reason (1) i
On 2013-03-19 04:43, Christian Hammond wrote:
The new RBTools 0.5 is out. This is a major release, led by our own Steven
MacLeod, and is, to me, the most exciting release of RBTools we've put out.
There's a bunch of new command line scripts and a brand new Python API that
you can use to talk to R
On 2013-03-19 10:16, Kudrettin Güleryüz wrote:
I have cloned the latest RBTools from github. After I make changes to
postreview.py regarding perforce, I'd like to test my changes but
postreview.py assumes I'll be submitting reviews regarding RBTools itself.
Can I override this behavior? If not pl
On 2013-03-20 10:13, Kudrettin Güleryüz wrote:
I may be wrong but I feel like both suggestions are kind of inconvenient in
my case. I was hoping to debug the script in eclipse where I make changes
in pydev. I am open to suggestions as to how to debug the changed code.
I'd like to be able to use
On 2013-03-20 20:12, A.M. wrote:
Is it possible to use the rb API in 1.7.5 to get the changes to reviewboard
in the past X minutes (any review request changes)? I am creating a review
board poller which will then update a ticket system with links to
reviewboard.
I had previously made a reviewboa
On 2013-04-20 01:55, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I don't think I've seen this. Can you open the Chrome console log, try
again, and see what errors may appear?
Is the server able to generate the diffs? I'm sure Christian knows much
more about RB than I do :-), but multiple browser fa
When I go to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110059/ and click
'review' or 'add comment', nothing happens.
Looking at a web console, I see:
SyntaxError: Unexpected token ';' /r/110059/:40
ReferenceError: Can't find variable: gReviewRequestId
/static/rb/js/reviews.min.8dcc237657b9.js:112
Type
On 2013-04-25 15:03, Christian Hammond wrote:
There was a report just a few days ago about this. What's odd is that
nothing around these lines have changed in about 6 months.
I do, however, see why it's causing a javascript error. The code to set the
default for gOpenAnIssue is not being set. Wh
On 2013-04-25 15:16, Christian Hammond wrote:
Very strange. It'd be one thing if I saw any reports of this back when the
related feature was shipped (1 year ago!), but to just start seeing them
now...
Well, I also probably have not logged in for that long :-).
Maybe it is only affecting users
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If you entered a
passphrase when generating the key then I found ReviewBoard can't handle it.
Well... yeah. Where would RB store the pass-phrase? :-)
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project?
On 2013-05-02 06:36, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:35:18 PM UTC+1, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-05-01 07:23, Tim wrote:
Review Board won't handle password protected private keys. If
you entered a passphrase when generating the key then I found
ReviewBoard can't handle
On 2013-05-03 16:58, mamta.nanav...@gmail.com wrote:
My company is currently evaluating between Gerrit and Reviewboard and one
of the points that we are debating on is Gatekeeping.
Gerrit automatically runs tests after a review is approved and ready to be
merged into jenkis. Is there any mechani
On 2013-05-07 18:30, Yugesh Kambham wrote:
When i was creating a new site directory it didn't give me an option to
select PostgresSql and it has only mysql and sqllite(not for production)
and i picked up mysql, went through the steps and encountered an error
_mysql_exceptions.OperationalError: (
On 2013-05-28 13:22, Kristin Thomas wrote:
Some more info, when this is not working, the page source has the following:
var gOpenAnIssue = ;
instead of:
var gOpenAnIssue = true;
Um... this seems familiar. Have you upgraded through a number of RB
versions? Is the user having trouble either n
On 2013-05-30 11:42, Robert Burkhall wrote:
I can't seem to get ReviewBoard to install on any CentOS 6.4 installation
i've tried, What's going on here?
[Command]
easy_install ReviewBoard
[Results]
Searching for ReviewBoard
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
No local packages
(Going to run these by the list first; let me know if opening issues
would be preferred.)
I like the new dependency feature! :-D ...But I notice two minor things
about it I think could be even better:
- Since we have 'bugs' as a dashboard column, any reason not to have
'depends' and 'blocks'
On 2013-06-10 13:32, Allan Caffee wrote:
Is any way to have code automatically committed/pushed to Subversion/Git
once a requisite set of users have given a review a ShipIt! I believe some
other code reviews support this and I was curious if anyone has attempted
this and whether it's something th
On 2013-06-10 15:17, Safder Ali Khan wrote:
One more observation. It seems that the version that needs to be passed is
the commit index version and not the file index. If I navigate from gitweb
via tree -> README -> history -> blob for the latest version it is
displayed in this URL.
http://10.5.
On 2013-06-10 16:02, Christian Hammond wrote:
On 2013-06-10 13:32, Allan Caffee wrote:
Is any way to have code automatically committed/pushed to Subversion/Git
once a requisite set of users have given a review a ShipIt! I believe some
other code reviews support this and I was curious if anyone h
On 2013-06-10 18:00, Safder Ali Khan wrote:
In order to help debug this can you please tell me what git command review
board runs to check the existance of the version for a remote repo. I will
try to run it manually on the RB server to see what the output is and if it
is related so some server i
On 2013-06-25 07:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yeah, my TODO list includes working up some SELinux rules for
ReviewBoard and getting rb-site to be capable of setting them up during
installation. It's a pretty big task and low on my priority list right
now, unfortunately.
Heh. I'm running with SE
On 2013-06-25 12:27, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 06/25/2013 12:24 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2013-06-25 07:48, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yeah, my TODO list includes working up some SELinux rules for
ReviewBoard and getting rb-site to be capable of setting them up during
installation. It
On 2013-06-26 13:39, Robert Dailey wrote:
I'm attempting to install RBTools via easy_install -U but getting
failure. I'm using Python 3.3.2 x64 on Windows 7:
RBTools currently does not support Python 3.x. Can you use Python 2.7.x?
--
Matthew
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate to
On 2013-06-27 13:02, Robert Dailey wrote:
I could but it's rather inconvenient, since everything else I'm using
works on Python 3. Is support for Python 3 coming soon? It's already
been out for a few years, not sure why things still use 2.x :-(
Inertia? ;-)
I think major distros are not using
On 2013-07-19 13:16, Jay Li wrote:
Are there hooks/support for making UI changes to a review request page via
extensions? I want to add a status field to the request page for each
review, but I believe that the Review UI hook is only for code review on
the request page?
What are common practices
On 2013-08-15 17:38, Christian Hammond wrote:
New version of RBTools, with some new features, some bug fixes, and some
usability improvements.
The highlights include git-p4 support, better errors, new tools, and some
important changes to support Bitbucket Git repositories with the upcoming
Revie
On 2013-08-22 15:35, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
So I took a look at api-get, but can't figure out how to get individual
fields out of a request. Am I missing something? (Note: I need to do this
in shell, and don't know of an e
On 2013-08-23 07:43, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 08/22/2013 05:02 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Ah, well, I was wanting to rewrite the whole thing in Python anyway :-).
(Trying to do that and skirt around where RBTools wants a deprecated
optparse... now that's interesting...)
optpar
On 2013-08-30 16:40, Christian Hammond wrote:
All this is on my personal todo list. It bothers me, too, and I think
anybody who has done massive reviews has had the "where did the comment
go?" problem.
Heh... have you ever had to deal with *gerrit*? However bad RB might be
here, gerrit is orde
On 2013-09-11 11:23, Mark Addleman wrote:
I'm trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL. I have installed the EPEL
repository but yum install ReviewBoard returns
Error: Package: ReviewBoard-1.7.13-2.el6.noarch (epel)
Requires: python-docutils
You could try using --skip-broken to work a
On 2013-09-12 23:05, David Trowbridge wrote:
I'm not sure what that would look like. Comments are over a set of rows in
the side-by-side diff rather than a set of lines from either the old or new
file. While it's possible that we could just pull out the relevant lines
from the changed revision of
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
