Re: Django auth backend vs. ReviewBoard custom auth

2010-02-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher karrde...@gmail.comwrote: I'm trying to adapt a Django authentication backend to work with ReviewBoard (specifically https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/doc/django.html) Is there a guide anywhere on how to convert

RBTools Repository

2010-02-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Where can the RBTools source be checked out? I have a few contributions I'd like to make. Also, is there a repository set up in the test instance of ReviewBoard to submit RBTools patches? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user?

Re: ImproperlyConfigured: Error loading psycopg2 module: DLL load failed. The specified module could not be found

2010-02-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I had this problem when installing on RHEL5. On RHEL5, the pytz package (and several others) did not have egg files. Basically, reviewboard is querying the egg files on your system to see if you have them installed. If you manually install 'pytz', it's safe to remove that line from

Re: Django auth backend vs. ReviewBoard custom auth

2010-02-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Feb 5, 6:16 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: That sounds quite ungood. Maybe try temporarily modifying your FasBackend to return None in get_or_create_user and in get_user. This *should* default it back to the built-in auth, I believe. I haven't tried it, though. How is

Re: Django auth backend vs. ReviewBoard custom auth

2010-02-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/10/2010 07:52 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: You should be able to append to your middleware declaration in conf/settings_local.py. If it must be in a specific location in the list, though, you might have to do a little extra. Christian What little extra do you mean? I tried adding

Real-world ReviewBoard deployment tricks

2010-02-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/16/2010 01:48 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote: Muhamed! I integrate ReviewBoard using server side git hooks (but every popular SCM can do that). This is not hard to write something like that. I guess You want to change state of issue in Redmine when code go to the ReviewBoard and change

Re: Review Board and remote user middleware/backend - user not forced to enter first/last names and email address

2010-02-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/22/2010 03:10 PM, Stodge wrote: I'm using the remote user middleware/backend to support basic http authentication: 'django.contrib.auth.middleware.RemoteUserMiddleware', and it seems to work nicely with Review Board. Apache forces a user to login and then this middleware/backend

Re: Create a repository via API? Alternatives?

2010-02-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Would you be willing to share your db scripts? I'm looking to do much the same thing for our deployment. It would be nice to have someplace to start. On 02/24/2010 11:52 AM, Stodge wrote: For now I'm just directly modifying the DB, though that's kind of naughty! On Feb 24, 10:18 am, Stodge

Re: Django auth backend vs. ReviewBoard custom auth

2010-02-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 02/10/2010 07:52 PM, Christian

Building without reCAPTCHA support

2010-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Is it possible to build ReviewBoard 1.5beta1 without support for reCAPTCHA? For example, we're using a custom auth mechanism, so we won't be using the internal auto-registration at all. Rather than carry an extra, unused dependency on reCAPTCHA, can it just be built without it? -- Want to help

Re: Building without reCAPTCHA support

2010-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/09/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, You could modify the list of dependencies to not require it, and then patch the code to conditionally use it (it might be conditional today). You'd have to go this route for each version, though. There's not much we can do on our

Re: Requesting ideas for Google Summer of Code

2010-03-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/10/2010 04:32 PM, Dan Savilonis wrote: I would generalize Stephen's idea and just call it general support for distributed vcs workflow since RB isn't really built around that model and we're kind of stuffing it in after the fact. I found some time today and decided to extend

Re: How to allow access on reviews per repository

2010-03-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/17/2010 10:48 AM, Mihai wrote: Hello, First of all thank you for the great app. Second, I am in need of an advice/info. I have more repositories for different teams and I would like the users to have access only on reviews from a specific repository. Is this possible? Thank you

Re: Anyone hosting of Review Board for OSS projects?

2010-03-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
In the next few weeks, I'm going to be rolling out a ReviewBoard instance available to all Fedora Hosted projects. On 03/23/2010 11:16 PM, Charles wrote: Hi, I am a developer from the NAnt project on SourceForge.net. I have been evaluating different code review tools and is curious if there

Re: Anyone hosting of Review Board for OSS projects?

2010-03-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
What about openSuSE build service? We are trying to setup our build on there as well ... http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service Otherwise, since we are hosted on SourceForge.net, I guess we have to setup an account over at Fedora? Thanks, Charles On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Stephen

Re: AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'image_new_from_file'

2010-04-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Just to throw out an obvious question: does the directory already exist? Because the installer will fail like this in that case. On 04/13/2010 09:13 AM, Dwayne McCully wrote: Hi Christian, The RPM that is installed is pygtk2-2.10.1-12.el5. Also, I'm getting a strange error when running as

SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I'm almost there with my ReviewBoard deployment, but I can't figure out why it doesn't seem to be sending emails for reviews/review updates. Can anyone here point me at a good way to debug the problem? The SMTP server doesn't seem to be receiving anything, so I'm pretty sure the problem is on

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/19/2010 05:25 PM, Scott Quesnelle wrote: Here is what I did with V 1.0 when I had an email issue, in reviewboard/reviews/email.py In function def send_review_mail(user, review_request, subject, in_reply_to, extra_recipients, template_name, context={}): I added the

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at all (the log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how to track down the misconfiguration. On 04/20/2010 11:22 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote: In

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/20/2010 11:26 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at all (the log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how to track down the misconfiguration

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
:26 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at all (the log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how to track down the misconfiguration. Upon further

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/20/2010 03:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: It shouldn't work for just one or the other. Try running ./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py. That connect_signals should be happening on the first request to Review Board. Are you running this using fastcgi or mod_python? Might also be worth

Re: SMTP support/debugging

2010-04-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/20/2010 03:37 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: I'm not sure whether mod_wsgi would be somehow different or not. initialize is called in reviewboard/urls.py, which should definitely be invoked regardless. If you're seeing the Log file for Review Board ... in the log files, then you should be

Default permissions from auth backends

2010-04-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Is there a configurable set of default permissions somewhere? I'm facing an issue where the users provided by our custom backend do not have privilege to set the description or summary of review requests. We don't have a common group that all users are a member of, so I can't set group-level

Re: What with state Rejected?

2010-04-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/26/2010 02:22 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, The intended purpose of Discard is to mark it as basically rejected or abandoned in its entirety, without the intention of updating the diffs to fix the reasons for it being rejected. We don't really support any other meanings for it or

Re: Editing Post Review

2010-04-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/26/2010 06:16 AM, sgkannan wrote: Hi, We want to run the code against PMD rule set and attach the result to the review request using the post review tool. i'm new to Python and Review Board. If you can give me some directions on what to edit and where, then I'm hopeful of doing it.

Re: Finally a PyLucene Package

2010-04-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/30/2010 01:32 PM, grimbeaver wrote: For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of PyLucene, just an easy to install package. I just

Re: how not use plain text password in RBTools

2010-05-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 05/25/2010 04:08 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Cookies can only be matched against fully-qualified domains. This isn't a Review Board restriction, but rather a restriction of nearly every HTTP client implementation that deals with cookies. This is why post-review is asking you every

Re: Review Board 1.5 Beta 2 Released

2010-06-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/02/2010 08:50 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Sorry, I missed this e-mail entirely. It's most likely that the origin of the central server is different between what Review Board has recorded and what your Git clone is using. The remote origin on your clone must match exactly the Path

ReviewBoard example instance

2010-06-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I'm curious, what database is the http://reviews.reviewboard.org server using? We deployed on PostgreSQL recently, and I've noticed a distinct performance issue with it. I can only directly compare it to SQLite, but of course that's local access. But we went from 1s responses on webpages to

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-06-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Well, right now 4-8s for a page refresh is just barely within the tolerable limits of my users. I'm trying to determine whether it makes more sense to migrate to MySQL (if it would be better performance) I was also curious whether ReviewBoard's reference implementation was running on

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-06-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge delay with PostgreSQL though. Can you tell me which pages are showing delays? (Is it all of them?) Yeah, it's every page but the login page. That includes the

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-06-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge delay with PostgreSQL though. Can you tell me which pages are showing delays? (Is it all of them?) if it's the dashboard, there are some known slowdowns when

Re: installing on ubuntu 10.04

2010-06-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/22/2010 08:52 AM, kgoedert wrote: Hi, I was trying to install reviewboard on a ubuntu 10.04 using memcached as suggested. Everything went right until the point of creating the database. I chose mysql. I get the following output File

Git Patchsets (was [Re: Help on viewing diff])

2010-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 06/24/2010 02:43 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: The way Review Board handles diffs today is that every revision of the diff is meant to be a single change, from the base to the tip of the branch. What I think you're wanting (please correct me if I'm wrong) is more of a patchset concept, with

Re: Reviewboard on Centos4.8?

2010-07-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 07/02/2010 03:22 AM, Madhavi wrote: I have install RB on CentOS 5.4 and its up running. Slightly off-topic: are you using the EPEL5 RPMs for this? -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-07-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
://www.vmware.com On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-07-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 07/19/2010 03:00 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, Sorry, I missed the e-mail where you attached the profile log. I'm looking through it now. The render_to_response was misleading. The slowdown is actually within precompute_objects, which does some database queries. That primarily

Re: ReviewBoard example instance

2010-07-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 07/19/2010 03:12 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Can you verify that the settings_local.py in Review Board and the settings.py in other Django sites are using the exact same database backend? Are all the sites running on the same server? The logs you provided show a lag of ~2 seconds rather

Re: where to find rb-site install command.

2010-07-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 07/30/2010 04:27 AM, RANJAN KHOT wrote: Hi, I have downloaded from http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/. I have downloaded Review Board,RBTools and Djblets-0.6 . I have unzipped nad untarred the packages. i don't find rb-site command. Is there any script which i have to run

Re: no module named pytz - centos 5.4

2010-08-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 08/04/2010 07:33 AM, Itai Frenkel wrote: Hello, I am trying to install reviewboard on our intranet on a clean centos 5.4. I got the httpd error: no module named pytz (see complete log below) Performed the following: easy_install –U pytz easy_install pytz Also started python and

Re: Handling non-linear DVCS histories (git)

2010-08-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 08/09/2010 02:32 PM, Yang Zhang wrote: I'm using reviewboard with git projects, and I'm interested in hearing how other folks are handling non-linear DVCS histories. Each commit may have one or two parents - for those with two, how does one generate a patch from that (if you do at all)?

Re: Review Board 1.5 RC 2 is released

2010-09-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Great work getting 1.5 RC 2 out. I upgraded the FedoraHosted deployment today, but I've stumbled across three new bugs. (I strongly suspect that two of them were present in RC1 as well, but I didn't notice them then) 1829 - Viewing the server log from the admin interface fails 1828 - 500 Error

Re: Review Board 1.5 RC 2 is released

2010-09-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 09/24/2010 04:19 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, I suspect that 1829 is due to an installation or packaging problem with Djblets. I can't reproduce this on our install, which was installed using easy_install. The log.html template is there, and has been for a while. Is

Re: Review Board 1.5 RC 2 is released

2010-09-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sep 30, 3:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Are there any custom modifications at all in your $sitedir/conf/settings_local.py? This was the problem. Our infrastructure requires the use of a custom authentication mechanism (which requires added values in the INSTALLED_APPS

Re: Upgrade problem 1.0.5 to 1.5 RC2

2010-10-01 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sep 30, 11:23 am, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote: This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1. Just as an aside, you know that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life in December of last year, right? It's not a safe platform to deploy any server on, as it no longer receives security patches or

Re: Review Board 1.5 RC 2 is released

2010-10-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sep 30, 3:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: I've tested this thoroughly with Django 1.1.2, and it absolutely works here. We actually have unit tests for this functionality, ran by nightly builds using both Django 1.1 and 1.2, so I was surprised to hear that there was a

Re: ReviewBoard git support

2010-10-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Oct 28, 5:59 pm, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote: Hi ReviewBoardians! I'm a KDE developer and we're being moved from svn to git. In KDevelop we where using gitorious, there's a feature called merge request where a branch is given and it is compared to its parent which is pretty cool

Re: post-review rewritten in C#

2010-12-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Dec 8, 8:28 am, Grokwik grok...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a Subversion server, and Review Board 1.5 installed (on Windows) and chose to do post-commit reviews. So far, I wrote a quite simple batch script that (using a scheduled task) checks in Subversion if there's new commits and if

Re: More information

2010-12-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Dec 14, 7:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: There's another thread about this. Basically, it seems mod_wsgi + Django or Review Board has some problems on certain systems (particularly on Windows). I'll be looking into some fixes for this, but for the moment, my advice is

Re: django.core.exceptions.ImproperlyConfigured: MySQLdb-1.2.1p2 or newer is required; you have 1.2.1

2011-01-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555868 I opened a bug a while ago to have the version of MySQL-python in RHEL5 brought up to a usable level. So hopefully it will be resolved in the near future. In the meantime, it's off to RHEL 6 for me :) Also, if you don't want to self-manage

Re: RBTools 0.3 released

2011-02-01 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 01/30/2011 03:59 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, RBTools 0.3 has been released. There's a list of what's changed, and some important notes for people with mod_wsgi configurations, on the news page below. http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/01/30/rbtools-0-3-released/ Thanks

Re: RBTools 0.3.1 and Review Board 1.5.3 released

2011-02-07 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/07/2011 03:43 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, We just put out new RBTools and Review Board releases. I've built ReviewBoard 1.5.3 for Fedora and EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.fc14

Re: RBTools 0.3.1 and Review Board 1.5.3 released

2011-02-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 02/09/2011 04:47 PM, Gilles Moris wrote: On Monday 07 February 2011 09:49:31 pm Stephen Gallagher wrote: I've built ReviewBoard 1.5.3 for Fedora and EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.el5 https

Re: LDAP setup with 1.5.4

2011-03-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/25/2011 12:35 PM, storms wrote: I am trying to setup LDAP on my new install with 1.5.4 on RedHat using apache + mod_python. I can't seem to get it to work... Here's my latest from the /var/log/httpd/error_log... I see the warning messages but not sure how to proceed with them... I

Re: 500 - Internal Server Error | Review Board

2011-03-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/24/2011 08:27 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, Looks like a new python-dateutil was just released today that only works with Python 3, and it's being fetched. That's not good. We'll have to get out an update to be more specific about the version needed. Try getting rid of the old

Re: Review Board 1.5.5 released

2011-03-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 03/28/2011 06:24 AM, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, Review Board 1.5.5 is out, and contains a variety of good bug fixes, plus a fix for a major installation problem caused by a new release to one of our dependencies, python-dateutil. Is the dependency on python-dateutil == 1.5

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On 04/08/2011 11:57 AM, Dean wrote: If I use this method (very attractive) do you recommend I back out the steps I've made prior to using your yum/rpm install? It's always a good idea to start from a clean state, yes. However RPM/yum *should* be able to handle things for you here. -- Want to

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
* Required modules are missing You are missing Python modules that are needed before the installation process. You will need to install the necessary modules and restart the install. Databases (required): * sqlite3 (pysqlite2, sqlite3) * MySQL (MySQLdb) *

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote: Ah Ha! I'd been waiting for Centos 6. How do you guess I might do with Scientific Linux 6 in 64-bit? Well, in theory Scientific Linux is identical to RHEL 6 (just recompiled), so I suspect it should work just fine. -- Want

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote: Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit prototype box. I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit server for it. I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can

Re: installing Reviewboard on Centos 5.5 64-bit

2011-04-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote: Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit prototype box. I expect to have them drive it around a bit

Re: Problem building on CentOS 5.5

2011-05-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 12:53 -0700, andrej wrote: Has anybody built reviewboard on CentOS 5.5? Take a look at EPEL (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) I maintain ReviewBoard 1.5.x RPMs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its clones there. Installing from the EPEL 5 repo is likely going to save you

Re: Error in installing Review Board

2011-06-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote: Hi, I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing ANY new software on it. It

Re: Installing PyLucene on Redhat

2011-07-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 11:30 -0700, Billy Visto wrote: When installing PyLucene on Redhat, after installing the jcc, you must modify the makefile to suit your needs. There is a chunk of code commented out that you have to un-comment a section for your os's environment. When you un-comment out

Re: Installing PyLucene on Redhat

2011-07-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:41 -0700, Anton Cohen wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: Could you write up your complete steps to getting PyLucene installed and working on Red Hat? I'd like to turn those steps into a tool to include with my

Re: WSGI Configuration Permission denied

2011-08-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 06:58 -0500, Chris Tooley wrote: All of the python packages installed via easy_installed were: -rwxr-x--- root:root This was preventing anyone other than root from using those python libraries, that had to be resolved. All of the directories under

Re: How do I apply a downloaded diff to my git repository?

2011-08-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 11:38 -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote: I'm looking at a review from a co-worker, and I'd really like to have her code on my development machine, so that I can run the unit tests and mess around generally. I figured that I'd be able to download the diff from the review

Re: Review entire repository

2011-08-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:38 -0700, kevin gill wrote: Hi, I am using git, and starting with reviewboard on a new project. Is there a command to create a review/diff for the entire repository. I can use post-review to create a diff between the first commit and the current version (using a

Re: Review Board 1.5.6 released

2011-08-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 03:42 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi everyone, I just put out Review Board 1.5.6, which has many bug fixes and some performance improvements for users who have been running RB for a while. News post is up at

Re: Review Board 1.5.6 released

2011-08-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:59 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Ugh. Bad wording. It means what you'd hope it would mean. We had an unconditional usage of the modpython handler in Django, which could break if no mod_python support existed on the system. Interesting... I'd installed several times

Re: Remote sql db

2011-08-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:21 -0700, sssd help wrote: NVM, never made it far enough through the rb-site install tool. Please disregard this question. On Aug 23, 4:12 pm, sssd help sssdh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Im trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL5.3. Im wondering if its

Re: easy_install upgrade from 1.5.2 to 1.5.6 not working

2011-08-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:47 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi, That is bizarre. So your initial install grabbed 1.5.2? I haven't seen this before. What you're doing looks fine, and I know others have installed/upgraded to 1.5.6. It's almost as if the version matching is busted, or it's

ReviewBoard on OpenShift Express

2011-09-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I don't know how many users on this list are familiar with OpenShift. This is a Red Hat-sponsored cloud service providing virtual applications. One of the popular applications selected for use as a demonstration of the power of OpenShift was ReviewBoard. I'd like to describe for you what I now

Re: ReviewBoard on OpenShift Express

2011-09-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
service, RBCommons (http://www.rbcommons.com) ;) Christian On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: I don't know how many users on this list are familiar with OpenShift. This is a Red Hat-sponsored cloud service providing virtual applications. One

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
If you're using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x (I'm guessing 5.2, not 2.5), you might want to try using the 1.5.6 RPM I maintain in EPEL. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL for details on how to get it set up. I should warn you that there's one catch: MySQL doesn't work with this version

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
install these for me? Thanks, On Sep 14, 8:53 pm, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: If you're using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x (I'm guessing 5.2, not 2.5), you might want to try using the 1.5.6 RPM I maintain in EPEL. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPELfor details

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote: Switched with --console rb-site --console install /var/www/mysite1 * Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard This will prepare a Review Board site installation in: /var/www/mysite1 We need to know a

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 12:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote: Hi, Here is the path ll -d /usr/lib/_mysql.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root 111441 Sep 16 11:35 /usr/lib/_mysql.so ll -d /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/My* drwxr-xr-x 3 root 4096 Sep 16 11:37 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ MySQLdb I

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Christian, did the minimum Django version get bumped in 1.5.6? (Or did that change in Djblets?) That's definitely going to be an issue for RHEL users. I remember you telling me that Django 1.1.x was going to be supported for the whole 1.5.x series of releases (but dropped in 1.6.x) On Sep 17, 2011

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 15:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote: Switched with --console rb-site --console install /var/www/mysite1 * Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard This will prepare a Review Board

Re: rb-site install failed - ImportError: Entry point ('console_scripts', 'rb-site') not found

2011-09-23 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 12:02 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Pretty sure, yes. For most people, it's just a few commands. The problem you're hitting is that you're trying to perform a custom Python install, instead of using native distro packages. So you're doing far too much by hand, instead

Re: RBTools 0.3.4 released

2011-09-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote: Hey everyone, RBTools 0.3.4 is released. It's a small bug fix release, which may be useful to those using Git, RBCommons, or Python 2.7. See http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/09/26/rbtools-034-released/ for more information.

Re: Is there a print function in review board?

2011-09-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:32 -0700, Chris Clark wrote: One option is to print the email sent from reviewboard. If you want to print the diffs you are likely to find sizing issues with the web page approach with the wide side-by-side diff view. We've modified our RB server to include the

Re: Problem : A repository was not found at the specified path.

2011-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 13:50 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote: Thanks for the hint: It seams that SELinux caused the problem. As soon as I disabled the whole SELinux, the repository can be added. Is there a better solution then disabling SELinux, like changing some access rights? I'm don't know

Re: LDAP configuration

2011-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:43 +0530, jack jack wrote: After configuration of LDAP we need create specfic user in the review board right? I added following entries LDAP host = ldap://nascmroot01:3268 BaseDN = dc=xxware,dc=com Do i need to fill all the information in LDAP

Re: LDAP configuration

2011-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:09 +0530, jack jack wrote: I added following entries as suggested. Anonymous User Mask: uid=%s,CN=ldapquery,OU=Service Accounts,OU=Exception Accounts,DC=na,DC=companyname,DC=com Do not use %s. It must be a specific user. Anonymous User Password: password After

post-review and file uploads

2011-10-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Is there a way to use post-review (or the API that post-review implements) to submit arbitrary files alongside a diff? I had a thought on how to solve two issues we have with using Review Board on our git-based project. The first issue is that the diff file uploaded to Review Board and the diff

Re: Problem : A repository was not found at the specified path.

2011-10-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 15:51 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote: this command bizarrely does not stop (I killed it after one hour)... audit2allow /var/log/audit/audit.log (as root) Sorry, my fault. That was a typo. Should be: audit2allow /var/log/audit/audit.log -- Want to help the Review Board

Re: Problem : A repository was not found at the specified path.

2011-10-04 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:35 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote: well now it went quite fast ;-) #= httpd_t == allow httpd_t memcache_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect; allow httpd_t port_t:tcp_socket name_connect; allow httpd_t smtp_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect; Ok,

Re: Reviewboard LDAP configuration

2011-10-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:31 +0530, jack jack wrote: Dear All, While trying to connect to LDAP user reviewboard logs say WARNING - LDAP error: The specified object does not exist in the Directory or provided invalid credentials: uid=jackj But actually jackj is a valid credential.

Re: reviewboard 1.6.1 with wsgi

2011-10-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 00:59 -0700, Rohini Kumar Tharigonda wrote: I do not want to install it as root. I installed it in a sub directory. it works fine only if make the follwing WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/ reviewboard.wsgi instead of #WSGIScriptAlias

Review Board, Git and patch-series

2011-10-31 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I've been trying to work out for some time now how to accomplish patch-series in Git with Review Board. This is a very important part of my project's workflow, and the lack of this support has been preventing us from deploying. I think I came up with three ideas, each building on each other, to

Re: Submit plain diff without revision info

2011-11-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 03:09 -0800, Annulen wrote: Use case 2: People use VCS, but they work on Windows and don't want to install Python to get post-review. It's almost impossible to format diff manually for git or hg. This is not true at all, at least for git: git format-patch -1 -M -C

Re: post-review

2011-11-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:29 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: Good question. mod_wsgi is, it seems, the future of Python web service integration. It's become the de facto standard at this point. mod_python is dead, and fastcgi is not the most reliable thing out there (at least,

Re: New security releases: 1.5.7 and 1.6.3

2011-11-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 03:21 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: If you're running 1.5.x, you can upgrade to this release by doing: $ sudo easy_install -U ReviewBoard==1.5.7 Otherwise, just upgrade as normal. Just to let anyone know that happens to be using Review Board on an older system

Re: how to list the reviewboard sites

2011-11-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 07:12 -0800, SathiyaMoorthy wrote: Hi, I am new to reviewboard, I would like to know how to list the reviewboard sites in the system that is installed by someone else. Actually am trying to upgrade the reviewboard system here, and I found in the instruction - each

Re: how to list the reviewboard sites

2011-11-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:09 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:06, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com wrote: One thing I've been toying with writing a patch for: have 'rb-site install' maintain a file /var/lib/reviewboard/sites.list that would be a simple list

Re: CentOS Installation

2011-11-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:37 -0600, Chris Tooley wrote: Every single package installed by running easy_install ReviewBoard or easy_install -U ReviewBoard (ie: anything that gets pulled down) has permissions that prevents ReviewBoard from working on CentOS. I've now done this installation on 2

Re: Review Board 1.6.4 and RBTools 0.4.0 released

2012-02-27 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:05 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Stephen, It's possible it runs with 1.2.x, but there is absolutely no testing of this on our end anymore. 1.3 is compatible with 1.2.x, but I understand you have certain guidelines to work with. This is a difficult issue, but

  1   2   3   4   5   >