On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher karrde...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm trying to adapt a Django authentication backend to work with
ReviewBoard (specifically
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/doc/django.html)
Is there a guide anywhere on how to convert
Where can the RBTools source be checked out? I have a few
contributions I'd like to make.
Also, is there a repository set up in the test instance of ReviewBoard
to submit RBTools patches?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user?
I had this problem when installing on RHEL5. On RHEL5, the pytz
package (and several others) did not have egg files.
Basically, reviewboard is querying the egg files on your system to see
if you have them installed. If you manually install 'pytz', it's safe
to remove that line from
On Feb 5, 6:16 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
That sounds quite ungood. Maybe try temporarily modifying your FasBackend to
return None in get_or_create_user and in get_user. This *should* default it
back to the built-in auth, I believe. I haven't tried it, though.
How is
On 02/10/2010 07:52 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
You should be able to append to your middleware declaration in
conf/settings_local.py. If it must be in a specific location in the
list, though, you might have to do a little extra.
Christian
What little extra do you mean? I tried adding
On 02/16/2010 01:48 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
Muhamed!
I integrate ReviewBoard using server side git hooks (but every
popular SCM can do that). This is not hard to write something like
that.
I guess You want to change state of issue in Redmine when code go to
the ReviewBoard and change
On 02/22/2010 03:10 PM, Stodge wrote:
I'm using the remote user middleware/backend to support basic http
authentication:
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.RemoteUserMiddleware',
and it seems to work nicely with Review Board. Apache forces a user to
login and then this middleware/backend
Would you be willing to share your db scripts? I'm looking to do much
the same thing for our deployment. It would be nice to have someplace to
start.
On 02/24/2010 11:52 AM, Stodge wrote:
For now I'm just directly modifying the DB, though that's kind of
naughty!
On Feb 24, 10:18 am, Stodge
Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com mailto:chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 02/10/2010 07:52 PM, Christian
Is it possible to build ReviewBoard 1.5beta1 without support for
reCAPTCHA? For example, we're using a custom auth mechanism, so we won't
be using the internal auto-registration at all. Rather than carry an
extra, unused dependency on reCAPTCHA, can it just be built without it?
--
Want to help
On 03/09/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
You could modify the list of dependencies to not require it, and then
patch the code to conditionally use it (it might be conditional
today). You'd have to go this route for each version, though.
There's not much we can do on our
On 03/10/2010 04:32 PM, Dan Savilonis wrote:
I would generalize Stephen's idea and just call it general support for
distributed vcs workflow since RB isn't really built around that model
and we're kind of stuffing it in after the fact.
I found some time today and decided to extend
On 03/17/2010 10:48 AM, Mihai wrote:
Hello,
First of all thank you for the great app.
Second, I am in need of an advice/info.
I have more repositories for different teams and I would like the
users to have access only on reviews from a specific repository. Is
this possible?
Thank you
In the next few weeks, I'm going to be rolling out a ReviewBoard
instance available to all Fedora Hosted projects.
On 03/23/2010 11:16 PM, Charles wrote:
Hi,
I am a developer from the NAnt project on SourceForge.net. I have been
evaluating different code review tools and is curious if there
What about openSuSE build service? We are trying to setup our build on
there as well ...
http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service
Otherwise, since we are hosted on SourceForge.net, I guess we have to
setup an account over at Fedora?
Thanks,
Charles
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Stephen
Just to throw out an obvious question: does the directory already exist?
Because the installer will fail like this in that case.
On 04/13/2010 09:13 AM, Dwayne McCully wrote:
Hi Christian,
The RPM that is installed is pygtk2-2.10.1-12.el5. Also, I'm getting
a strange error when running as
I'm almost there with my ReviewBoard deployment, but I can't figure out
why it doesn't seem to be sending emails for reviews/review updates.
Can anyone here point me at a good way to debug the problem? The SMTP
server doesn't seem to be receiving anything, so I'm pretty sure the
problem is on
On 04/19/2010 05:25 PM, Scott Quesnelle wrote:
Here is what I did with V 1.0 when I had an email issue, in
reviewboard/reviews/email.py
In function
def send_review_mail(user, review_request, subject, in_reply_to,
extra_recipients, template_name, context={}):
I added the
Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott
recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at
all (the log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how to
track down the misconfiguration.
On 04/20/2010 11:22 AM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
In
On 04/20/2010 11:26 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott
recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at
all (the log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how
to track down the misconfiguration
:26 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Sorry, maybe I was unclear. By putting that log message where Scott
recommended, I proved that send_review_mail() was not being called at all (the
log message never printed). So I'm trying to figure out how to track down the
misconfiguration.
Upon further
On 04/20/2010 03:31 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
It shouldn't work for just one or the other. Try running
./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py.
That connect_signals should be happening on the first request to
Review Board. Are you running this using fastcgi or mod_python?
Might also be worth
On 04/20/2010 03:37 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
I'm not sure whether mod_wsgi would be somehow different or not.
initialize is called in reviewboard/urls.py, which should definitely
be invoked regardless. If you're seeing the Log file for Review Board
... in the log files, then you should be
Is there a configurable set of default permissions somewhere? I'm facing
an issue where the users provided by our custom backend do not have
privilege to set the description or summary of review requests.
We don't have a common group that all users are a member of, so I can't
set group-level
On 04/26/2010 02:22 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
The intended purpose of Discard is to mark it as basically rejected or
abandoned in its entirety, without the intention of updating the diffs
to fix the reasons for it being rejected. We don't really support any
other meanings for it or
On 04/26/2010 06:16 AM, sgkannan wrote:
Hi, We want to run the code against PMD rule set and attach the result
to the review request using the post review tool.
i'm new to Python and Review Board. If you can give me some directions
on what to edit and where, then I'm hopeful of doing it.
On 04/30/2010 01:32 PM, grimbeaver wrote:
For anyone interested I just installed an Ubuntu 10.04 LTS server and
the PyLucene package is finally built with Python 2.6 which means it
is finally usable via modpython. No more painful building of
PyLucene, just an easy to install package.
I just
On 05/25/2010 04:08 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
Cookies can only be matched against fully-qualified domains. This
isn't a Review Board restriction, but rather a restriction of nearly
every HTTP client implementation that deals with cookies. This is why
post-review is asking you every
On 06/02/2010 08:50 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I missed this e-mail entirely.
It's most likely that the origin of the central server is different
between what Review Board has recorded and what your Git clone is
using. The remote origin on your clone must match exactly the Path
I'm curious, what database is the http://reviews.reviewboard.org server
using? We deployed on PostgreSQL recently, and I've noticed a distinct
performance issue with it.
I can only directly compare it to SQLite, but of course that's local
access. But we went from 1s responses on webpages to
Well, right now 4-8s for a page refresh is just barely within the
tolerable limits of my users. I'm trying to determine whether it makes
more sense to migrate to MySQL (if it would be better performance)
I was also curious whether ReviewBoard's reference implementation was
running on
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge
delay with PostgreSQL though. Can you tell me which pages are showing
delays? (Is it all of them?)
Yeah, it's every page but the login page. That includes the
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such a huge
delay with PostgreSQL though. Can you tell me which pages are showing
delays? (Is it all of them?)
if it's the dashboard, there are some known slowdowns when
On 06/22/2010 08:52 AM, kgoedert wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to install reviewboard on a ubuntu 10.04 using memcached
as suggested. Everything went right until the point of creating the
database. I chose mysql. I get the following output
File
On 06/24/2010 02:43 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
The way Review Board handles diffs today is that every revision of the
diff is meant to be a single change, from the base to the tip of the
branch. What I think you're wanting (please correct me if I'm wrong)
is more of a patchset concept, with
On 07/02/2010 03:22 AM, Madhavi wrote:
I have install RB on CentOS 5.4 and its up running.
Slightly off-topic: are you using the EPEL5 RPMs for this?
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com mailto:step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 06/10/2010 03:24 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
We're running on MySQL. I don't know why you'd be seeing such
a huge
On 07/19/2010 03:00 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Sorry, I missed the e-mail where you attached the profile log. I'm
looking through it now.
The render_to_response was misleading. The slowdown is actually within
precompute_objects, which does some database queries. That primarily
On 07/19/2010 03:12 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Can you verify that the settings_local.py in Review Board and the
settings.py in other Django sites are using the exact same database
backend?
Are all the sites running on the same server?
The logs you provided show a lag of ~2 seconds rather
On 07/30/2010 04:27 AM, RANJAN KHOT wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded from http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/.
I have downloaded Review Board,RBTools and Djblets-0.6 . I have
unzipped nad untarred the packages. i don't find rb-site command. Is
there any script which i have to run
On 08/04/2010 07:33 AM, Itai Frenkel wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install reviewboard on our intranet on a clean centos
5.4.
I got the httpd error: no module named pytz (see complete log below)
Performed the following:
easy_install –U pytz
easy_install pytz
Also started python and
On 08/09/2010 02:32 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
I'm using reviewboard with git projects, and I'm interested in hearing
how other folks are handling non-linear DVCS histories. Each commit
may have one or two parents - for those with two, how does one
generate a patch from that (if you do at all)?
Great work getting 1.5 RC 2 out. I upgraded the FedoraHosted
deployment today, but I've stumbled across three new bugs. (I strongly
suspect that two of them were present in RC1 as well, but I didn't
notice them then)
1829 - Viewing the server log from the admin interface fails
1828 - 500 Error
On 09/24/2010 04:19 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I suspect that 1829 is due to an installation or packaging problem
with Djblets. I can't reproduce this on our install, which was
installed using easy_install. The log.html template is there, and has
been for a while.
Is
On Sep 30, 3:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Are there any custom modifications at all in your
$sitedir/conf/settings_local.py?
This was the problem. Our infrastructure requires the use of a custom
authentication mechanism (which requires added values in the
INSTALLED_APPS
On Sep 30, 11:23 am, D Krueger dekr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is on Fedora 10 with Django 1.1.1.
Just as an aside, you know that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life in
December of last year, right? It's not a safe platform to deploy any
server on, as it no longer receives security patches or
On Sep 30, 3:50 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I've tested this thoroughly with Django 1.1.2, and it absolutely works here.
We actually have unit tests for this functionality, ran by nightly builds
using both Django 1.1 and 1.2, so I was surprised to hear that there was a
On Oct 28, 5:59 pm, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
Hi ReviewBoardians!
I'm a KDE developer and we're being moved from svn to git. In KDevelop we
where using gitorious, there's a feature called merge request where a branch
is given and it is compared to its parent which is pretty cool
On Dec 8, 8:28 am, Grokwik grok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a Subversion server, and Review Board 1.5 installed (on
Windows) and chose to do post-commit reviews.
So far, I wrote a quite simple batch script that (using a scheduled
task) checks in Subversion if there's new commits and if
On Dec 14, 7:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
There's another thread about this. Basically, it seems mod_wsgi +
Django or Review Board has some problems on certain systems
(particularly on Windows). I'll be looking into some fixes for this,
but for the moment, my advice is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555868
I opened a bug a while ago to have the version of MySQL-python in
RHEL5 brought up to a usable level. So hopefully it will be resolved
in the near future. In the meantime, it's off to RHEL 6 for me :)
Also, if you don't want to self-manage
On 01/30/2011 03:59 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
RBTools 0.3 has been released. There's a list of what's changed, and
some important notes for people with mod_wsgi configurations, on the
news page below.
http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/01/30/rbtools-0-3-released/
Thanks
On 02/07/2011 03:43 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
We just put out new RBTools and Review Board releases.
I've built ReviewBoard 1.5.3 for Fedora and EPEL:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.fc14
On 02/09/2011 04:47 PM, Gilles Moris wrote:
On Monday 07 February 2011 09:49:31 pm Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I've built ReviewBoard 1.5.3 for Fedora and EPEL:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ReviewBoard-1.5.3-1.el5
https
On 03/25/2011 12:35 PM, storms wrote:
I am trying to setup LDAP on my new install with 1.5.4 on RedHat using
apache + mod_python. I can't seem to get it to work...
Here's my latest from the /var/log/httpd/error_log... I see the
warning messages but not sure how to proceed with them...
I
On 03/24/2011 08:27 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
Looks like a new python-dateutil was just released today that only
works with Python 3, and it's being fetched. That's not good. We'll
have to get out an update to be more specific about the version needed.
Try getting rid of the old
On 03/28/2011 06:24 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
Review Board 1.5.5 is out, and contains a variety of good bug fixes,
plus a fix for a major installation problem caused by a new release to
one of our dependencies, python-dateutil.
Is the dependency on python-dateutil == 1.5
On 04/08/2011 11:57 AM, Dean wrote:
If I use this method (very attractive) do you recommend I back out the
steps I've made prior to using your yum/rpm install?
It's always a good idea to start from a clean state, yes. However
RPM/yum *should* be able to handle things for you here.
--
Want to
* Required modules are missing
You are missing Python modules that are needed before the
installation process. You will need to install the necessary
modules and restart the install.
Databases (required):
* sqlite3 (pysqlite2, sqlite3)
* MySQL (MySQLdb)
*
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah Ha! I'd been waiting for Centos 6. How do you guess I might do
with Scientific Linux 6 in 64-bit?
Well, in theory Scientific Linux is identical to RHEL 6 (just recompiled),
so I suspect it should work just fine.
--
Want
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
prototype box.
I expect to have them drive it around a bit and then build a 64-bit
server for it.
I'm heading over to the documentation to see if I can
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dean deanjohns...@gmail.com wrote:
Success! Many thanks! It's now working on a Scientific Linux v6 32-bit
prototype box.
I expect to have them drive it around a bit
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 12:53 -0700, andrej wrote:
Has anybody built reviewboard on CentOS 5.5?
Take a look at EPEL (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) I maintain
ReviewBoard 1.5.x RPMs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux and its clones
there.
Installing from the EPEL 5 repo is likely going to save you
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:42 -0700, ROAAN wrote:
Hi,
I am installing ReviewBoard on my machine running Fedora 10. I seem to
It's worth noting that Fedora 10 was declared end-of-life almost two
years ago, so you're probably going to run into difficulty installing
ANY new software on it.
It
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 11:30 -0700, Billy Visto wrote:
When installing PyLucene on Redhat, after installing the jcc, you must
modify the makefile to suit your needs. There is a chunk of code
commented out that you have to un-comment a section for your os's
environment. When you un-comment out
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 12:41 -0700, Anton Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
Could you write up your complete steps to getting PyLucene installed and
working on Red Hat? I'd like to turn those steps into a tool to include
with my
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 06:58 -0500, Chris Tooley wrote:
All of the python packages installed via easy_installed were:
-rwxr-x--- root:root
This was preventing anyone other than root from using those python
libraries, that had to be resolved.
All of the directories under
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 11:38 -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
I'm looking at a review from a co-worker, and I'd really like to have
her code on my development machine, so that I can run the unit tests
and mess around generally.
I figured that I'd be able to download the diff from the review
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 13:38 -0700, kevin gill wrote:
Hi,
I am using git, and starting with reviewboard on a new project.
Is there a command to create a review/diff for the entire repository.
I can use post-review to create a diff between the first commit and
the current version (using a
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 03:42 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just put out Review Board 1.5.6, which has many bug fixes and some
performance improvements for users who have been running RB for a
while.
News post is up at
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:59 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Ugh. Bad wording. It means what you'd hope it would mean. We had an
unconditional usage of the modpython handler in Django, which could
break if no mod_python support existed on the system.
Interesting... I'd installed several times
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:21 -0700, sssd help wrote:
NVM, never made it far enough through the rb-site install tool. Please
disregard this question.
On Aug 23, 4:12 pm, sssd help sssdh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Im trying to install ReviewBoard on RHEL5.3. Im wondering if its
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:47 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
That is bizarre. So your initial install grabbed 1.5.2? I haven't seen
this before. What you're doing looks fine, and I know others have
installed/upgraded to 1.5.6. It's almost as if the version matching is
busted, or it's
I don't know how many users on this list are familiar with OpenShift.
This is a Red Hat-sponsored cloud service providing virtual
applications.
One of the popular applications selected for use as a demonstration of
the power of OpenShift was ReviewBoard. I'd like to describe for you
what I now
service, RBCommons (http://www.rbcommons.com) ;)
Christian
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
I don't know how many users on this list are familiar with OpenShift.
This is a Red Hat-sponsored cloud service providing virtual
applications.
One
If you're using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x (I'm guessing 5.2, not 2.5),
you might want to try using the 1.5.6 RPM I maintain in EPEL.
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL for details on how to get it set up.
I should warn you that there's one catch: MySQL doesn't work with this
version
install these for me?
Thanks,
On Sep 14, 8:53 pm, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
If you're using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x (I'm guessing 5.2, not 2.5),
you might want to try using the 1.5.6 RPM I maintain in EPEL.
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPELfor details
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote:
Switched with --console
rb-site --console install /var/www/mysite1
* Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard
This will prepare a Review Board site installation in:
/var/www/mysite1
We need to know a
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 12:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote:
Hi,
Here is the path
ll -d /usr/lib/_mysql.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 111441 Sep 16 11:35 /usr/lib/_mysql.so
ll -d /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/My*
drwxr-xr-x 3 root 4096 Sep 16 11:37 /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/
MySQLdb
I
Christian, did the minimum Django version get bumped in 1.5.6? (Or did that
change in Djblets?) That's definitely going to be an issue for RHEL users. I
remember you telling me that Django 1.1.x was going to be supported for the
whole 1.5.x series of releases (but dropped in 1.6.x)
On Sep 17, 2011
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 15:02 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:36 -0700, Nelson Jones wrote:
Switched with --console
rb-site --console install /var/www/mysite1
* Welcome to the Review Board site installation wizard
This will prepare a Review Board
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 12:02 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Pretty sure, yes. For most people, it's just a few commands. The
problem you're hitting is that you're trying to perform a custom
Python install, instead of using native distro packages. So you're
doing far too much by hand, instead
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:27 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hey everyone,
RBTools 0.3.4 is released. It's a small bug fix release, which may be
useful to those using Git, RBCommons, or Python 2.7.
See http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2011/09/26/rbtools-034-released/
for more information.
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:32 -0700, Chris Clark wrote:
One option is to print the email sent from reviewboard. If you want to
print the diffs you are likely to find sizing issues with the web page
approach with the wide side-by-side diff view.
We've modified our RB server to include the
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 13:50 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote:
Thanks for the hint: It seams that SELinux caused the problem. As soon
as I disabled the whole SELinux, the repository can be added. Is there
a better solution then disabling SELinux, like changing some access
rights? I'm don't know
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:43 +0530, jack jack wrote:
After configuration of LDAP we need create specfic user in the review
board right?
I added following entries
LDAP host = ldap://nascmroot01:3268
BaseDN = dc=xxware,dc=com
Do i need to fill all the information in LDAP
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:09 +0530, jack jack wrote:
I added following entries as suggested.
Anonymous User Mask: uid=%s,CN=ldapquery,OU=Service
Accounts,OU=Exception Accounts,DC=na,DC=companyname,DC=com
Do not use %s. It must be a specific user.
Anonymous User Password: password
After
Is there a way to use post-review (or the API that post-review
implements) to submit arbitrary files alongside a diff?
I had a thought on how to solve two issues we have with using Review
Board on our git-based project.
The first issue is that the diff file uploaded to Review Board and the
diff
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 15:51 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote:
this command bizarrely does not stop (I killed it after one hour)...
audit2allow /var/log/audit/audit.log (as root)
Sorry, my fault. That was a typo.
Should be:
audit2allow /var/log/audit/audit.log
--
Want to help the Review Board
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 17:35 +0200, Mathias Schnydrig wrote:
well now it went quite fast ;-)
#= httpd_t ==
allow httpd_t memcache_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect;
allow httpd_t port_t:tcp_socket name_connect;
allow httpd_t smtp_port_t:tcp_socket name_connect;
Ok,
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:31 +0530, jack jack wrote:
Dear All,
While trying to connect to LDAP user reviewboard logs say
WARNING - LDAP error: The specified object does not exist in the
Directory or provided invalid credentials: uid=jackj
But actually jackj is a valid credential.
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 00:59 -0700, Rohini Kumar Tharigonda wrote:
I do not want to install it as root.
I installed it in a sub directory.
it works fine only if make the follwing
WSGIScriptAlias / /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/
reviewboard.wsgi
instead of
#WSGIScriptAlias
I've been trying to work out for some time now how to accomplish
patch-series in Git with Review Board. This is a very important part of
my project's workflow, and the lack of this support has been preventing
us from deploying.
I think I came up with three ideas, each building on each other, to
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 03:09 -0800, Annulen wrote:
Use case 2: People use VCS, but they work on Windows and don't want to
install Python to get post-review. It's almost impossible to format
diff manually for git or hg.
This is not true at all, at least for git:
git format-patch -1 -M -C
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:29 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
Good question.
mod_wsgi is, it seems, the future of Python web service integration.
It's become the de facto standard at this point. mod_python is dead,
and fastcgi is not the most reliable thing out there (at least,
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 03:21 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
If you're running 1.5.x, you can upgrade to this release by doing:
$ sudo easy_install -U ReviewBoard==1.5.7
Otherwise, just upgrade as normal.
Just to let anyone know that happens to be using Review Board on an
older system
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 07:12 -0800, SathiyaMoorthy wrote:
Hi,
I am new to reviewboard, I would like to know how to list the
reviewboard sites in the system that is installed by someone else.
Actually am trying to upgrade the reviewboard system here, and I found
in the instruction - each
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:09 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 8:06, Stephen Gallagher step...@gallagherhome.com
wrote:
One thing I've been toying with writing a patch for: have 'rb-site
install' maintain a file /var/lib/reviewboard/sites.list that would be
a simple list
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 15:37 -0600, Chris Tooley wrote:
Every single package installed by running easy_install ReviewBoard
or easy_install -U ReviewBoard (ie: anything that gets pulled down)
has permissions that prevents ReviewBoard from working on CentOS. I've
now done this installation on 2
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 11:05 -0800, Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Stephen,
It's possible it runs with 1.2.x, but there is absolutely no testing
of this on our end anymore. 1.3 is compatible with 1.2.x, but I
understand you have certain guidelines to work with.
This is a difficult issue, but
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo