On 02/17/10 14:38, James Carlson wrote:
Dombrowski, Neil wrote:
My next question (which I think may have been partially answered already); it's
obvious now that the global zone inherits the ngzones (non-global zones)
routing information; is that a two-way street? If zone1 has a default route
On 09/04/09 11:21, Jim Nissen wrote:
All,
A customer is migrating five zones, from a Niagara system to a M5000, to
test performance. The zones are in a ZFS pool, on SAN storage. They
plan on moving this storage over to the M5000, and doing a straight
import of the zones vs. making a copy of
On 09/04/09 16:39, Jason Schroeder wrote:
Depending on how their common OS standard builds are kept in sync, and
what meta package bundle they typically install on their boxes, there
may be some sync/cleanup of patches/packages that need to be done to
ensure both sides are in sync as reported
On 08/19/09 17:35, Steffen Weiberle wrote:
On 08/19/09 17:25, Robert Hartzell wrote:
You have given me much to think about ;). I'm going to set up a test
system this weekend and see what I can screw up...
If I can find a reasonable solution for this I will ping the list and
post a howto on my
On 08/18/09 16:42, Robert Hartzell wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
How many ways do you have to get to the internet? I hope two, since
10.0.0.0/24 will need one.
I am not able to picture your setup, however, take a look at
Maybe a better explanation of what I'm trying to accomplish would
On 08/19/09 17:25, Robert Hartzell wrote:
You have given me much to think about ;). I'm going to set up a test
system this weekend and see what I can screw up...
If I can find a reasonable solution for this I will ping the list and
post a howto on my wiki.
again, thanks for helping out.
On 08/16/09 12:31, v wrote:
When I install a zone, packages are downloaded (approx. 70MB in size) that
really slow down the process. Is there any way I can pre-download these and
use them for each zone I create and install?
Thanks...
You might want to check out
On 08/02/09 08:23, Ketan wrote:
I 've a zone which is running oracle db instance. We have exported the SAN file system from the global zone as following
fs:
dir: /oradb
special: /oradb
raw not specified
type: lofs
options: []
from global zone
#df -h
On 07/29/09 02:47, Jack LING wrote:
by default, the network configuration of the global zone is set to auto-detect.
I think this should be dhcp?
Reading Solaris System Administration documentations, hostname.interface
file(s) under the /etc/inet directory is used for setting static ip address
On 07/27/09 23:40, Jack LING wrote:
dear all,
I've installed mysql and glassfish packages in my OpenSolaris 2009.06
installation in VirtualBox. Then I created a non-global zone (I think it is
sparse-root, by default).
Within the non-global zone, mysql glassfish are unavailable. Actually I
On 07/23/09 20:32, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
Hello zones community members,
I'm one of the engineers working on Solaris 10 Containers (S10Cs) for
OpenSolaris (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/s10brand). I'm
currently evaluating networking requirements for S10Cs. Our ultimate
goal is to
On 07/15/09 17:27, Christine Tran wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Patrick J.
McEvoyno-re...@opensolaris.org wrote:
I am trying to pre-configure zones with sysidcfg as described in:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/z.login.task-38?l=ena=viewq=sysidcfg+and+containers
On 06/11/09 08:38, Ketan wrote:
I read somewhere which says FSS can be assigned to processor sets, resulting in more sensitive control of priorities on a server than raw processor sets
can any one tell me how we can assign FSS to processor set and how it works ?
Thanx .
If you create
On 06/03/09 02:06, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 2 juin 09 à 23:21, Dan Price a écrit :
We don't have sparse zones in 2009.06, but zones work fine, and are
quite small by default. Please try installing a zone, and just add
the additional software you need use 'pkg install'.
Any chance to
On 06/05/09 05:17, Tom Stocker wrote:
Do you know something about OSOL 2009.06? I can't get routing to work. But I
need to use exactly this version. Very strange.
I'll try quagga now.
no details, no clue :(
in general, attempts to manipulate networking will fail if network
automagic (NWAM)
On 06/05/09 06:18, Jon Anderson wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Can you post a log of what you dig and what response
you got?
I assume that e1000g0 was not already plumbed in the
global zone?
Rgds,
Jon
dladm show-phys
output could be useful.
Kevin Pan wrote:
Hi,
I have installed OpenSolaris
On 05/25/09 02:33, Narendra Kumar S.S wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
On 05/22/09 14:28, Nicolas Droux wrote:
On May 21, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Narendra Kumar.S.S wrote:
Here below is the sysidcfg of NGZ:
cat /etc/sysidcfg:
system_locale=C
terminal=xterms
security_policy=NONE
timezone=US
On 05/22/09 14:28, Nicolas Droux wrote:
On May 21, 2009, at 11:38 PM, Narendra Kumar.S.S wrote:
Here below is the sysidcfg of NGZ:
cat /etc/sysidcfg:
system_locale=C
terminal=xterms
security_policy=NONE
timezone=US/Eastern
nfs4_domain=east.sun.com
root_password=rJSJNt0RfvMy6
On 05/18/09 11:31, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I have been doing all on Solaris next testing using Nevada, as all the
tools I know work, and my understanding of installation and
configuration applies to that as well as Solaris 10. Now I am playing
with 2009.06 and some
,
Vincent
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Steffen Weiberle
steffen.weibe...@sun.com mailto:steffen.weibe...@sun.com wrote:
On 04/27/09 13:40, Vincent Boisard wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering, as Crossbow is now integrated, does it still
make sense to use Shared IP
On 04/27/09 13:40, Vincent Boisard wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering, as Crossbow is now integrated, does it still make sense
to use Shared IP Zones or is it better to use exclusive-ip zones with a
vnic for each of them.
With a vnic, we can benefit from the bandwidth management and al, but
On 04/23/09 23:15, Patrick Pinchera wrote:
I'm working with a customer who wants to put 16 containers in an M8000
server. Each of these containers will have the need to have a private
network that they all share so that they can all talk to each other,
and the network traffic DOES NOT have to
On 02/24/09 21:26, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Bangalore, Suresh
suresh.bangal...@railcorp.nsw.gov.au wrote:
Hi Mike
The netmask is /24.
Thanks
Suresh
This implies that you have three different subnets and you either have
three distinct cables going to the machine or
On 02/19/09 16:26, Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
Le 19 févr. 09 à 17:41, Wolfgang Pungartnik a écrit :
Asif,
just mount and share the folder from the global zone. Loopback mount the
folder into the non-global zone.
And don't mount from non-global to global thru NFS !
It's not supported !
It
On 02/17/09 20:02, Charles Ditzel wrote:
Is it possible to use Jumpstart to create Solaris Containers ?
Not directly, only via post-install scripts.
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 02/17/09 20:42, Steffen Weiberle wrote:
On 02/17/09 20:02, Charles Ditzel wrote:
Is it possible to use Jumpstart to create Solaris Containers ?
Not directly, only via post-install scripts.
Forgot to mention, JET allows you to do so.
http://wikis.sun.com/display/JET/Home
http
On 01/23/09 14:41, Matt Walburn wrote:
Zones Group,
A colleague and I have been trying to find a definitive answer for a Zones
networking question as we're trying to solidify how we backup large Oracle
databases running inside of Zones.
Basically the scenario is this: If I Initiate a
Setting a default router for a non-global zone is a new feature in
Solaris 10 10/08 and has been in SXCE for a while. I could not find a
lot of details on its use, so I have published a blog entry on using the
zonecfg net option for defrouter at http://blogs.sun.com/stw/
In the process, I noticed
On 01/05/09 15:43, Menno Lageman wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
For my test zones, I usually don't set a password via /etc/sysidcfg.
Usually I don't configure ssh to allow root login, and the zones are
configured with limited network services (secure by default), so I
don't worry
For my test zones, I usually don't set a password via /etc/sysidcfg.
Usually I don't configure ssh to allow root login, and the zones are
configured with limited network services (secure by default), so I don't
worry.
With build 105 (the one with Crossbow integrated), all of a sudden
zlogin
On 10/20/08 21:29, Challa, Narsimha Reddy (STSD-HYD) wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Solaris containers. Can somebody please clarify the below
questions:
1. What are the supported versions of Solaris that support Containers
concept? As per my search on this from “Solaris 10 Update
On 10/20/08 10:58, Joe Barbey wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a situation that doesn't seem to be really covered in the
various docs I've read up to now. I have a number of servers where I
want to do something like the following, if possible. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
I would
On 10/06/08 21:38, Glenn Faden wrote:
Max,
The default route option is not specific to TX zones. However, it is
intended for environments where your zones aren't sharing the same
physical interfaces. This feature sets the default route for an
interface so I don't think it will provide
Hi,
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/gbbxq?a=view has a caution
regarding restoring a lofs mounted filesystem within a non-global zone.
The prior paragraph makes reference to system read-only mount points.
With the exception of possible access from other zones (the global, or
shared
On 08/26/08 15:18, Michael Harsch wrote:
Team,
I'm new to zones-discuss, so apologies if this has already been posted.
I would like to configure hundreds (maybe thousands) of zones on a
single machine. I've had good luck up until ~250 running zones, at
which point I run out room to
Jim Nissen wrote:
Will Solaris 10 Zones, with exclusive IP, allow one to set NGZ TCP
tunables, like tcp_conn_req_max_q?
ndd settings can be done in an exclusive IP Instance zone.
while ndd is not a service,
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/faq/#ipinst_services
/etc/system
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
During testing of the zone update on attach feature
we have encountered a problem with IDRs on S10.
If you are not familiar with an IDR, it is a temporary,
one-time patch that is issued to try to solve a problem
before an official patch is released. Because these
are
Brian Smith wrote:
When rcapd is calculating how much memory is free, to compare to the memory
cap enforcement threshold, does it consider the memory used by the ZFS cache
to be free or used? If I set rcapadm -c 90 then will rcapd behave any
differently than with rcapadm -c 0 if there is a ZFS
James Carlson wrote:
James Carlson writes:
Steffen Weiberle writes:
BTW, this only works for default routes. Static ones don't work. at
least that is my/others' experience.
That's not true. Default routes are not supposed to be special.
They're just regular network routes that happen
Alain Durand wrote:
Hi James,
Could you please elaborate a bit further ? I must admit I do not really
understand what should be done.
http://blogs.sun.com/stw/entry/using_ip_instances_with_vlans
Thanks,
Alain
On Jun 5, 2008, at 3:05 PM, James Carlson wrote:
Alain Durand writes:
Alain Durand wrote:
Thanks for your answer, I might be missing something obvious, but how
can I add this route ?
(global zone) # route add default xx.121.41.254
add net default: gateway xx.121.41.254: Network is unreachable
Probably because the global zone does not have an IP address on
Andrew Black wrote:
Steffen Weiberle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in news:48170EEA.5070009
@sun.com:
Yes, I have done this. I duplicate the passwd/shadow entries in /etc/
into zonepath/root/etc/ and lofs mount the home directory into the
non-global zone.
Is it OK for root on the global zone
Sanjay Akula wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to add two IP Address to local zone? can anybody suggest
the how to add two ip's to local zones?
If using shared-IP non-global zones, you can add as many 'add net'
sections to the zonecfg as you would like. Keep in mind if it is more
that 255 per
Matthew Taylor wrote:
Apologies if my search-fu failed me and the answer is out there.
I have a box with 1 hme and 8 qfe interfaces. I would normally used
exclusive IP zones, but that is not possible with these non-gldv3 driven
interfaces, so I am forced to use shared IP zones.
hme0
Matthew Taylor wrote:
Do you know if plumbing all the qfe's without assigning an IP address will
persist across reboots of the base system? Never tried that on Solaris
(works on LINUX iirc, but you have to enter the info in a script).
It will not persist. An empty /etc/hostname.qfe0 will
Matthew Taylor wrote:
Thank you, and to those who replied off line as well. I will try it out and
report back on my success (or not) in the morning.
It does strike me that this should be in the docs. I have gone through
817-1592-15, the Zones admin guide, and find little to nothing on
James Carlson wrote:
Matthew Taylor writes:
Do you know if plumbing all the qfe's without assigning an IP address will
persist across reboots of the base system? Never tried that on Solaris
(works on LINUX iirc, but you have to enter the info in a script).
This will make plumbing persist
Mike Grove wrote:
I'm in need of a doc that explains how we keep memory/io secure between
zones. I've not found anything that goes into any tech detail.
Any pointers?
Does the design spec at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2002/174/
help?
Thanks,
-Mike
--
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Gael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
The OS will still display the whole amount of RAM with these RM
entries ... You cannot use it, but the installation scripts and
other tools using the usual OS command will still see the real RAM
and
.
Thanks for your response.
Anne
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steffen Weiberle
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 9:48 AM
To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] can non-zones see less RAM than global?
Mike
Maciej Browarski wrote:
Steffen Weiberle napisa?(a):
Maciej Browarski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, that is any chance to limit I/O disks or net operations per
zone?
While not directly configured per zone, Network Virtualization and
Resource Control, project Crossbow, went into beta
Maciej Browarski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, that is any chance to limit I/O disks or net operations per zone?
While not directly configured per zone, Network Virtualization and
Resource Control, project Crossbow, went into beta yesterday.
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/
You can
James Carlson wrote:
Mike Gerdts writes:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Enda O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
For the ce driver you will need
137042-01 SPACR
137043-01 X86
which fix CR 6616075 ( ON Part )
as well as
118777-12 SPARC
118778-12 x86
which fix CR 6606507 the ce
The list of patches for Solaris 10 on either SPARC or x86 are at
http://blogs.sun.com/stw/
Steffen
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
If you are running Solaris 10 and have ce NICs, zoneadmd patches are on
their way, due in a few weeks.
http://blogs.sun.com/stw/entry/ip_instances_with_ce_nics
Thanks
Steffen
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
I have a customer who is restricting NFS access to their data. Thus,
instead of authorizing each non-global zone to be a client, would like
to authorize only the global zone, and then lofs mount the NFS-mounted
file system into the non-global zone
[attempt to bcc this alias seemed to have failed]
If you have been waiting for the fixes to be able to use IP Instances
with the GigaSwift NICs (ce), they are now in OpenSolaris, and I have
tested them with Nevada build 80, currently available within Sun. I
don't know when build 80 ISOs will be
Ava,
Ava Zhang wrote:
Konstantin Gremliza wrote:
Ava Zhang schrieb:
Zoram Thanga wrote:
That's the problem. Use an IP address which is not in use. Shared IP
doesn't mean you share the IP address itself. It's the IP *stack* that
is shared.
Zoram
Must I use a free IP in the same
Brad Diggs wrote:
Hello Vic,
You have a few options. You can use secure by default to
disable most services and then as a post-zone creation
process, run a custom script that enables the services
that you want enabled through svcadm.
Or, you could through jass define a custom set of
Robert Smicinski wrote:
I was wondering that too - we'd like to use IP instances with ce's, we have
a lot of them.
- Bob
You have all been heard loud and clear!
A fix for *ce* is in progress. Fix for 6606507 and a related CR
should be in NV real soon now (can't find the build number at
James Carlson wrote:
michael writes:
I'd like to have a network common to all and only the zones on this host,
while preserving the separate IP stack of the exclusive zone. However the
exclusive zone cannot use a virtual interface on the shared phys interface.
There's currently no way
sunnie wrote:
After reading some material about zoneadm clone, it seems to me that such a
fast zone creation requires the template zone to be on a zfs file system.
However, if not, anything else can help speed up installing zone?
Especially, at present, my SUNOS only have a global zone.
Hi Dick,
Dick Davies wrote:
On 19/09/2007, Steffen Weiberle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ZFS, with Nevada, a snapshot and then clone is created, so it
is very fast.
That's also the case in Solaris 10 update 4, I believe.
That is not my experience, and I just tried it on build 12
Hi Chew,
Chew Tian Hai wrote:
Hi,
We have dedicated 3 Ce NIC ports on the global zone to be configure for 3
Zones on Multiple VLANS.We will be configured as IPMP link-based for each
interface.We can set default gateway on one of the VLANs.How can I set the
other 2 default gateway
Can you ping it from 'testzone'? It is configured on the same
interface, e1000g1.
Asif Iqbal wrote:
Hi All
I have a global zone and two non-global zones on same ip segment. I
can ping the default gw from global zone and zone1. But I cannot ping
the gw from zone2. Any idea what could be
In a related, but similar situation. How does one know that
they are
actually in a non-global zone vs a global zone? (Using a committed
interface).
zonename(1). And zonecfg(1M) states that the name 'global' is
reserved.
Steffen
Brandorr wrote:
On 8/29/07, John Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Besides what Jeff and Jeff has said,
Dennis wrote:
Hi,
a friend of mine has written a P2P application in Java as a master thesis.
Now we want to setup a testing configuration using containers to simulate the
function of each node. Therefore I have several question, any help is
BTW, http://www.slamd.com/ might do what you need. And it is
Java. I have used it in a zone to proxy LDAP requests between a
client and LDAP server. But not with lots of connections.
Dennis wrote:
Hi,
a friend of mine has written a P2P application in Java as a master thesis.
Now we want
Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 19 Jun 2007 at 09:37PM, Luke Schwab wrote:
Hi,
I have recently been running performance tests with zones on several
Sun servers. (280's and 880's), 2 CPU and 8CPUs respectively.
On my 280 servers (2CPU machines), I installed and booted 3 zones and
I get poor
Erik Nordmark wrote:
James Carlson wrote:
Getting the DHCP data into a form where Linux can use it inside the
zone might be a challenge, but it's worth some thought.
I think it would also require emulation/translation of some additional
Linux ioctls; I don't think the ioctl to *set* the IP
Hi Martin, looking at your question again...
Martin Man wrote:
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Martin,
Martin Man wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to use shared interface in my zone and configure it using dhcp
when I invoke zoneadm -z myzone boot.
This is not possible without IP Instances. To do
DJR wrote:
Hello,
a question,
I have dedicated NIC for two of my zones, but when I created the zones it
looked as it created it like a VIP, see output below...
That is a logical interface.
is that normal? I thought the zone would be using e1000g1 or e1000g2 by itself
zonecfg -z
Hi Manish,
Only IP Instances have been putback into Nevada. VNICs and flow management
are not there
yet. There is a DVD image based on build 61 that was posted at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/snapshots/ but there was a
problem
in the SPARC image. As soon as testing of the
Hi Jason, coming late into this thread,
Jason Bradfield wrote:
Thanks Jeff.
FYI, These zones will be allocated to different clients each with root
access to their zone and running their own software.
Whether you choose to provide root access to the non-global zone users
has no effect on the
Hi Ramesh,
Ramesh Mudradi wrote On 05/11/07 02:54,:
I am facing some routing issue with the local zone talking to outside network.
Here is the setup that I have:
Configured global zone (bge0) to 10.x.180.0 network
Configured local zone (bge1:1) to 10.x.230.0 network
local zone can talk to
Hi Michael, I haven't seen any other followup...
Michael A. Haines wrote On 05/08/07 17:53,:
Hi Jeff,
Do you want to set up quotas from the global zone or from the
non-global zone?
To be honest I thought this would be best done from a global zone, but
please let me have your thoughts. Can
Hi Matt, that is what happens with the share IP in the original zones.
You can get better IP isolation, including being able to set routes within
a non-global zone with IP Instances in recent Nevada builds, and this is
targeted for Solaris 10 7/07.
check out
This how to guide has the steps to do exactly what you are trying to do.
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/howtoguides/containersLowRes.jsp
See Creating the First Web Server Container about 2/3 of the way through.
Steffen
reply-to set to alias
prakash wrote On 05/03/07 08:16,:
Hi,
Please
Using the FAQ's example, you must create the /usr/local file system in the
global zone's /usr.
My own convention of individual zones' personal /usr/local is to use the
method described in the FAQ (thanks Jeff), and put the 'special' directory
in the zone's zonepath.
zonecfg:twilight add fs
Mike Gerdts wrote On 03/17/07 10:33,:
On 3/15/07, Darren Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(But you'd need to wait for some other changes to the networking
before you can run a DHCP server in a zone. I don't think that's
possible today).
In my lab, I have DHCP servers working in sparse
Darren J Moffat wrote On 02/14/07 14:30,:
Menno Lageman wrote:
Robert Gordon wrote:
So could we all agree that:
An NFS Server in a zone means that the namespace it exports is
restricted
to that zone only. By that i mean no global zone access to that
namespace,
nor would that
Hi Krzys,
Krzys wrote On 02/05/07 12:39,:
hello, I just got into zones and I have few questions:
is there any way to create zone with some additional customizations?
here is what I did:
# zonecfg -z titan1
titan1: No such zone configured
Use 'create' to begin configuring a new zone.
Hi Dave,
Dave Bevans wrote On 01/09/07 08:16,:
Hi.
I have a customer using SOL 10 1/06 on a development box, needs to
control Hardware resource allocation for software licensing. Wants to
create container/zone, with a separate /var. Also wants to know about
shared packages for creating
Hi Gino,
Is it possible that UNIX sockets are being used instead of INET? That would eliminate the TCP and IP
protocol processing down and up the stack required for IPC. X Windowing System does that--if the
client and server are co-located, they don't create IP connections. With the web and DB
My first guess would be a name resolution issue, possibly DNS.
Set your non-global zones to not boot automatically, and then look at one as it
boots.
Jason Gallagher - Sun Microsystems wrote On 12/18/06 20:09,:
Team,
*Please respond to me directly, for I'm not on this alias.*
Sparse local
Hi Jay,
Jay Sisodiya wrote On 12/14/06 15:59,:
Hello,
I have 2 interfaces ce0 and ce2 in an ipmp group. When configuring
zones, I am specifying ce0 and physical,
add net
set address=10.2.2.212
set physical=ce0
end
What happens when ce0 goes down ? Understood for running zone the i/p
will
Hi Dan,
Dan Price wrote On 12/12/06 13:59,:
On Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 10:47AM, Glenn Faden wrote:
Names pipes may be used between zones when Trusted Extensions is
enabled. The policy for data flow between zones is generally more
restrictive when TX is enabled, but in this case it is slightly more
: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have VLAN tagging working OK THanks to the James Carlson, Mike
Gerdts, Steffen Weiberle in particular.
Now I have a further question and similar help will be muchly
appreciated.
I have IPMP in 2 interfaces.eg
Brian Kolaci wrote On 10/20/06 13:41,:
Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Brian Kolaci wrote:
Thats how I came to the conclusion with the current implementation of
getting load averages coming from processor sets rather than the load
running within a zone prohibits the sole use of FSS to consolidate
Hi Roshan,
You need to configure the VLAN interfaces. If your VLAN Id is VVV, you
will have ceVVV000 for that VLAN on ce0 and ceVVV001 for that VLAN on
ce1. Multiply the VLAN number by 1000 and add it to the device
instance (in this case either 0 or 1).
So for VLAN 753 on ce1 and zone2,
I do similar, but use the builtin interface, with a dummy address that
is on the same network as my zones. Since this is set up after boot, I
do need to remember to start my zones manually before the demo.
Steffen
Jay Calaus wrote On 09/22/06 10:35,:
James,
Fortunately, it doesn't need to
Thanks, Alex.
Any idea when this will be integrated? So many BFUs, so few systems.
Thanks
Steffen
Alexander Kolbasov wrote On 09/22/06 16:13,:
Steffen == Steffen Weiberle Steffen.Weibere at sun.com writes:
Steffen Hi Alexander,
Steffen I am just starting to take a look
Jeff Victor wrote On 09/14/06 10:35,:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make any difference as to where or what kind of fs that the
zoneroot is mounted? and is there any difference with a whole root zone?
The situation is the same for both sparse and whole-root zones.
The key is whether or
Paula Van Wie wrote On 09/11/06 12:43,:
Please reply to me directly. Thanks
1. Should the zonepath, the directory that holds the local zone
definitions in the global zone be a separate filesystem, or simply a
directory under the root filesystem in the global zone?
It can be either. If you
Menno Lageman wrote On 09/07/06 13:21,:
Irlando Barros wrote:
Hil all,
Couple question on Zones:
1. I have two resource pools setup splitting up the CPU's and would
like to associate different resource pools to different zones
a. I have found tons of docs on doing it when the zone is
I'd suggest a role with the Maintenance and Repair profile. This
will allow the authorized user(s) to assume that role and run /sbin/init.
This can be set per zone, from within the zone.
Something such as:
# roleadd -u roleid -g group -P Maintenance and Repair userinit
# usermod -u userid -P
Hi Alastair,
Alastair Neil wrote On 08/22/06 08:59,:
Hi I have a Sunfire V440 with 2 processors and 10Gbytes of memory I have
configured eight zones all using the second ce interface ce1. The port
is connected to a nortel buisiness policy switch running at 100Mbs/full
duplex. I am seeing
Jerry Jelinek wrote On 08/16/06 18:14,:
Steffen,
Thanks for your comments. Responses in-line.
Steffen Weiberle wrote:
Hi Jerry, this is great.
I have a few comments below.
Thanks
Steffen
1) Hard vs. Soft RM configuration within zonecfg
We will enhance zonecfg(1M) so that the user
Padmalatha S wrote On 08/17/06 08:34,:
Hi there -
I'b been wanting to know this for while now.
Is there any simple method to know or classify
on a host which is running zones as which is
sparse and which is whole-root?
The zone names are very generic and doesnt give
a
Since I have wondered myself,...
Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote On 08/17/06 13:29,:
Hello
I tried finding the solution by scanning previous posts to this group,
and looking into manuals, but I haven't found the answer yet.
Where do I define the services (SMF) that a) get started by default in a
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
