-dev
sudo apt-get install libfreetype6-dev
Using the base OS provided library is usually the better option though (as
per my last update).
On Monday, October 24, 2011 2:29:59 PM UTC-7, Chris Clark wrote:
Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 23:01, Christian Hammond
saver so I know this is
benign (and I'm hitting publish too) but again sharing in case anyone else
is seeing this.
We're planning an upgrade to 1.6.12 soon, so maybe these will go away?
Chris
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:38:14 PM UTC-7, Chris Clark wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2
We upgraded a few weeks ago to 1.6.11 and we've hit a few minor problems.
For IE users when they edit the description the newlines disappear and they
get one massive line of text. Some times this occurs when viewing the
description too and not editing. The IE compatibility mode usually helps
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:26:36 AM UTC-7, Robert Dailey wrote:
Are there any screenshots I can look at for various UI improvements
for version 1.7? What do code review pages look like?
Have you seen the live site http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3347/ ?
--
Want to help the
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:12:08 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
The IE thing is weird, because I don't think anything should have changed
as far as text entry goes in a while... Which IE?
The IE behavior may not be new, for the version see the title (9) but
recall it was seen
Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 23:01, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I don't believe they're stored temporarily anywhere. If so, it's internal to
Django and I don't know it off-hand.
The only thing I've ever seen permission-wise is when there's a
Bill Fenner wrote:
We've been having trouble with the diff viewer highlighting the wrong
part of the file (e.g., it highlights 6 lines as being added, but
those 6 lines are 12 lines above the lines that were actually added).
I finally root-caused this to embedded control characters inside
One option is to print the email sent from reviewboard. If you want to
print the diffs you are likely to find sizing issues with the web page
approach with the wide side-by-side diff view.
We've modified our RB server to include the diff in the email that is
sent out for review (we've not yet
On 9/30/2011 11:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 11:32 -0700, Chris Clark wrote:
One option is to print the email sent from reviewboard. If you want to
print the diffs you are likely to find sizing issues with the web page
approach with the wide side-by-side diff view
Martin wrote:
Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication.
I want to each user can modifiy his email address.
I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it
still not working...
NOTE I'm not using LDAP with RB :-)
Usually when using LDAP it is a read only resource,
premod dev wrote:
I have been trying to upgrade my current reviewboard instance to 1.6.1
from the older 1.0.9. But when I try to upgrade the site, its giving
me the following error and failing the upgrade. Any idea why?
...
No fixtures found.
Registering new SCM Tool Plastic SCM
Christian Hammond wrote:
[RE changing backend databases] Unofficially, you can do the following:
On the old site: rb-site manage /path/to/site dumpdata dbdump.json
On the new: . loaddata dbdump.json
There are no guarantees it'll work, but give it a try.
Note: They will both need to be
Christian Hammond wrote:
...A couple important notes:
1) I would strongly recommend that, if you want to test new versions,
that you do it on a non-production system, such as your own machine or
on a VM. You can always copy over your database if you need to. That's
the best way of making
Eric Johnson wrote:
I've got some clients of the server I set up that wish to use 64-bit Windows.
Unfortunately, it appears that Python easy_install doesn't work properly in
that environment.
Consequently, those users cannot get RBTools (post-review) to work.
Is there a work-around, or
What is the minimum supported version of Python for RBtools? The Windows
specific docs mention 2.5
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/admin/installation/windows/
I just stumbled across some code that fails in 2.4 in the ClearCase code
(and hacked it to work with 2.4):
Hongbin Lu wrote:
My name is Hongbin Lu. I am currently working on the issue below.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?can=2q=693colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Component%20Owner%20Summary%20Milestoneid=693
Bruce Cran wrote:
I recently upgraded to 1.5.5 and found that with one review which had
several files changed, Review Board starts out listing all the files
under Files Changed, but quickly decides not to show one of them,
which has a 1-line change to the amount of leading whitespace. Other
Christian Hammond wrote:
I think we need a better way to factor this all out, though. Otherwise
you'll have to maintain a custom patch for every upgrade.
Can you tell me where you placed the first bit of code (encoding
changeset0['desc'])?
We probably can reuse the repository's Encoding
jh5774@samsung.com wrote:
Well, I found a little clue about encoding.
/usr/lib/python2.6/json/__init__.py
in this codes, they said python only decode 'ASCII' and 'Unicode'.
So, python couldn't decode when encounter like a 'Korean word'
I find some solution about decoding.
For example,
Leonel Togniolli wrote:
Every week or so I get one of these below in the mail from my RB
server. I wasn't able to determine what triggers it, unfortunately.
Me too. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1526
I suggest you log a comment on the issue/bug so that there is
Leonel, I forgot to ask, are you seeing this after an upgrade?
Chris Clark wrote:
Leonel Togniolli wrote:
Every week or so I get one of these below in the mail from my RB
server. I wasn't able to determine what triggers it, unfortunately.
Me too. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard
Martin wrote:
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']
What happens when you manually run:
git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at
Craig A wrote:
This may well be fixed by trying python 2.6 (or even 2.5) as you
suggested.
I tried Python 2.6.6 (could not find an msi installer for 2.5.5) and
voila! It works now, no more problems with BOM characters.
Thanks for your help Chris, I am glad this is working now.
, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com
mailto:chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote:
We had a customized version of 1.0.5.1 and we now have a (less)
customized version 1.5.5 (custom SCM back end and minor
email/template tweaks).
We're using Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS (hardy) on x86 (same as the last
We had a customized version of 1.0.5.1 and we now have a (less)
customized version 1.5.5 (custom SCM back end and minor email/template
tweaks).
We're using Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS (hardy) on x86 (same as the last time we
upgraded, we've left the OS alone) .
We had no problems at all with this
Craig A wrote:
I am getting an error similar to what was reported some time ago in
this post:
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/56fb450ceaef45c1
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xef in position
1285: ordinal not in range(128)
Specifically
Craig A wrote:
You mention you've customized postreview ...
is it possible that your new code has the Unicode assumption in
it rather than the original RBtools.
I don't think so, the relevant line of code looks like this:
return content_type, content
The trace back
Christian,
Is this a Reviewboard feature or a Django one? I would have guessed
this was a Django behavior. I'm not even a Django (auth) novice, let
alone expert, so sorry if this is a dumb question!
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Pablo,
No, there's no way to do this out of the box.
Alfred von Campe wrote:
We are experiencing a strange hang when viewing one particular review. When we click on the
View DIff we get a new web page and the Files Changed: section lists all
the files that have changed in this particular request. There are 20 files, and the information
for
I've recently been using a laptop with forward/back keys. These are
conveniently located by the arrow/cursor keys. In a web browser these
keys are the equivalent of alt-left/right (or the backwards/forwards on
screen button).
I've just spent the last 10 mins re-entering (multiple times) in
cogo wrote:
I have just started trying out reviewboard and I have some issues with
some diffs not beeing displayed when I click View diff in the review
request. When i download the diff I can see the content:
Index: //trunk/library/extras/global-post-commit-hook.php
brokenn wrote:
I've just installed Reviewboard 1.5RC2 on a Centos 5 box. When
selecting the timezone from the Admin-Settings-General Settings
menu, it lists time zones for all parts of the world, but under Europe
there are no UK cities.
I'm not London-centric, but would like to select a
I was following the instructions on
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/
And at the setup Reviewboard stage:
python ./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py
I got :
Error: No module named django_evolution
I worked around it by issuing:
python setup.py develop
jdt141 wrote:
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/RBTools-0.2-py2.5.egg/rbtools/
postreview.py, line 549, in process_json
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'loads'
I'm at a loss... Any and all help would be appreciated.
It looks like the json/simplejson module isn't
Jay wrote:
On Sep 21, 12:11 pm, Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com wrote:
It looks like p4 is claiming there is a perforce repo in the svn
location. A quick hack/test would be to modify postreview to check svn
first. I.e. hack the SCMCLIENTS def.
Let's assume this suggestion
Jay wrote:
I have post-review installed on windows and have successfully been
creating RB requests against perforce. We also have SVN projects, but
when I try to use post-review against them it wants to talk to
perforce instead. For instance if I enter:
post-review
Christian Hammond wrote:
We're finalizing the documentation and performing some final testing
before releasing Review Board 1.5. As per tradition, we're looking at
putting together a release party, and we'd like to invite anyone who
wants to come.
Details are still being worked out, but will
sakthi wrote:
Could find i have to use post-review tool to post the code into review
board.
Can some one help me out how to post ONLY *.c and *.h files
recursively from SVN directory.
Is there any automated script available.. where i shall modify the
require information to post the code that is
Timothy Pinet wrote:
In which file does reviewboard invoke the svn diff --diff-cmd=diff
command? I have been looking but can not find it. I then thought that
you probably call the pysvn lib for this. I checked the pysvn
documentation (http://pysvn.tigris.org/docs/
Timothy Pinet wrote:
I wanted to check post-review however since I am on Windows my
Python26\Scripts\post-review.exe is a compiled executable and not a
python file. Would it be enough to grab the post-review.py from the
repo and delete the exe?
Not with the current version. There are a few
sakthi v wrote:
I followed the following link to install ReviewBoard in Windows
http://yuanyi-wang.blogspot.com/2009/03/install-review-board-on-windows.html
I tried installed twice.. and from blank page .. i got stuck in page
showing Manual Server Updates Required
I tried re-installation PIL
ms wrote:
We use SVN for source control. I have a bunch of newly written code in
new java files that are not yet committed in subversion. I want to
review the code in these files using ReviewBoard, but I'm wondering
how to create diff for these files since they do not have a prior
version
abrightwell wrote:
I am considering integrating Review Board for my current project.
However, before doing so, I need to determine whether or not it will
place nicely with our current authentication process. All
authentication for every tool on our project revolves around the
authentication
Adam wrote:
However what I'm not seeing is any scriptable way of checking the
status of a review. Does something like this exist and I'm just not
finding it?
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/webapi/ or you could hit the
database directly (using raw SQL or the Django ORM).
Chris Clark wrote:
Follow up after a days usage after the upgrade.
Follow up a number of months later :-)
It turns out I also hit a problem with missing screenshots, but no error
for the user see:
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard/browse_thread/thread/d158d97bf5344847
Jan Koprowski wrote:
. When review is done and submitted
developer can change everything he want in working tree and commit
everything he want. I'm thinking how be sure that reviewed changes is
commited changes.
For us, we are just using the honour/honor system, i.e. no checks :-)
This
Christian Hammond wrote:
What version of patch are you guys running?
I'm running Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS - I have patch 2.5.9
ing...@reviews:~$ cat /etc/*elease*
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=8.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=hardy
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS
ing...@reviews:~$
Jan Koprowski wrote:
When I make review for file where some changes was made near last
line and it have not new line at end of file diffviewer crush :/ I'm
thinking about adding one more fake new line sign at the end
everytime. Is this patch will be submitted if I create one?
That is
Stodge wrote:
Thanks. I got confused between revisions and changesets, especially as
I develop stuff using Mercurial, while the other developers use SVN!
I'm curious why I can't create a review request via the json api with
the revision numbers as parameters. I guess I assumed review board
qhlonline wrote:
Hi, all
In the Admin page, There will be an Email setting. items will be
as follows:
Mail Server: Port: Username:
Password:
So there will be SMTPAuthentication.
But we want to use this Email account to send email
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Chris Clark
chris.cl...@ingres.com mailto:chris.cl...@ingres.com
wrote:
Kunjal wrote:
Once the Review is done, user has to make Review
Kunjal wrote:
Once the Review is done, user has to make Review as Close-Submitted
eles reviewers dashboard will still have the review.
We enforce this process on developers and developers are saying that
this is one extra step.
I was thinking whether it is possible to close the review
Tino Breddin wrote:
I'm interested in notifying external system about new review requests
where email isn't a good option. I've read in the roadmap that generic
hooks are planed for version 2.0, but is there anything similar in
place now which could be used for this purpose?
This suggestion
Dave Hocker wrote:
We have a large Perforce change list that generates a 550K diff file.
When we submit the review request, the request is created but there is
no diff attached.
.snip logs.
Is there a limit on diff file size? If so, can it be changed?
I can't comment on the
seacgmk wrote:
I've recently set up ReviewBoard with Perforce configured for pre-
commits. Perforce allows source files to be checked out by multiple
developers at the same time. If one developer submits a file for
review and then a second developer checks in their changes to the same
file
Christian Hammond wrote:
What you could do now is modify postreview.py so that the CVSClient
instance is created before the ClearCaseClient. That would guarantee
that CVS would check first.
An easy technique for dealing with this is to add another definition for
SCMCLIENTS, this way if the
David McCloskey wrote:
But Another problem is appearing now. Once it tries to do the post, I
get an error that the connection was refused on port 2401. I'm
guessing this is because we're using ssh tunnels only to connect to
our CVS servers. Is there some special way to configure my repository
The other option is to add a command line override for the SCM
repository information.
I ended up doing this for the SCM we use . although I've not yet
needed to make use of it :-) I think this is what the --p4-port flag is
for with Perforce.
You could also have some sort of mapping in
grimbeaver wrote:
I need a simple way to get the total number of reviews in a group.
We've assigned all the code reviews into groups based on project.
Project management has to report the total number of code reviews
completed for a project to our partner. When you look at the group
view it
qhlonline wrote:
在2009-12-23，Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com 写道：
Try the --submit-as flag instead. e.g.:
post-review --submit-as=A myfile
post-review --submit-as=B myfile
But We need that the loged user and the submiter to be the same
user. We are desiring detaied
prestomation wrote:
I am currently demo'ing review board to interface with our Perforce
server.
I seems that using post-review with a command like the following:
post-review --username=USERNAME --server=reviewboard 65428
tries to access the api at a subfolder with the same name as the
Try the --submit-as flag instead. e.g.:
post-review --submit-as=A myfile
post-review --submit-as=B myfile
Christian Hammond wrote:
Known bug. See http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=762
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
My 2 cents.
Modifying the registry and then restoring is not a great idea. I can see
why you are doing it but I'd encourage you to NOT do this. There is a
potential here for a background web app to fail (e.g. web browser based
IM tool).
I'd be tempted to monkey patch urllib(2), presumably
Have you tried using the:
--server=
flag?
RE the version of reviewboard, if this is a new install I would go ahead
and use 1.0.5.1 this shouldn't impact the error you are seeing but why
use an old version when you can use the new stable one ;-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi,
Is
Out of curiosity what size limit is this likely to be? 80 chars, 1024,
1Mb, 1Gb... :-)
Chris
Christian Hammond wrote:
Hi Ronak,
We will be limiting the lengths of these fields in a future version.
We're aware of the problem and have encountered this with some users
too. Expect a field
Christian Hammond wrote:
I don't know off-hand what we're going to set it to. We're thinking
about it, and suggestions are welcome. Here's where it gets tricky...
We're running up to maximum field lengths for the change info, and
that's a combination of multiple fields, including
Christian Hammond wrote:
We've just put out a release of Review Board 1.1 alpha 2. This is a
major enhancement release, and we'd love to get some testing for it.
It looks like 1.1 alpha 2 is at http://reviews.reviewboard.org. I've a
question on bug or behavior, someone posted a review url
I've a report from _some_ users that they are seeing multiple emails
being sent from Reviewboard.
The scenario is this:
1. postreview used to create/publish new review
2. review comments posted by reviewer, this code sucks change it... etc
3. postreview used to post new diffs, post
Kunjal wrote:
we want to customize the subject line
of the email which RB sends on submit of review.
Check out reviewboard/reviews/email.py - mail_review_request() look for
subject.
I nice to have would be a way to customize this from the site admin
page. I'm not likely to implement
Christian Hammond wrote:
Actually, I wouldn't mind such a parameter. (though, --diff-filename,
as we don't use underscores in parameter names). There's actually a
patch up for review for accepting via stdin (though it's a bit stale
and isn't the design we want), so I guess there are more
Just a quick note that I was able to upgrade from Reviewboard 0.9 to
1.0.5.1. Yes zero point nine to latest (stable)
0.9 pre-dates the rb-site so I simply had to:
1. Use rb-site to deploy a NEW EMPTY reviewboard server (yup, with a
new secret key, I didn't have to mess with it at all)
On Oct 29, 2:22 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
I should point out for anyone else reading the notes that you were able to
get away with not needing the old secret key because you're (I'm assuming)
using something like LDAP or NIS or Active Directory. In these cases, we
Whilst I use other distributed SCM's I've only just started with git (as
ReviewBoard uses it) and I think I'm having some trouble understanding
git (and reviewboard).
What I'd like to do is post for review changes/diffs against a branch
(not master/bleeding edge).
E.g.
git clone
David,
Which Ubuntu version did you use? I've not (yet) setup search but I've
found the LTS (8.10) Server version to be REALLY good for reliable
config. If you need a reliable, *production* server I wouldn't use
anything other than LTS. I can't promise LTS will handle Lucene but it
has the
I'm setting up a new dev environment for some hacking and I'm following:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#gettingstarted
After using git to get the reviewboard source and using
./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py I get errors about django_evolution.
Chris Clark wrote:
I'm setting up a new dev environment for some hacking and I'm following:
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#gettingstarted
After using git to get the reviewboard source and using
./contrib/internal/prepare-dev.py I get errors about
Christian Hammond wrote:
At the time we wrote search, this functionality didn't exist. However,
it's still too limited for our needs.
.
I'm hoping to find a better solution in the long term, but I don't
believe that the native database full text search is it. Now, maybe if
we
http://code.google.com/p/python-patch/wiki/README
pure python patch tool (only handles unified diffs though).
I've not tested it out but it may be useful to Windows users running a
server who do not want to install binaries.
Chris
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Christian Hammond wrote:
...I also would like an rbapi (or something) package for all the
server communication code. This would be separate from RBTools, but
RBTools would use it. post-review would be greatly simplified by these
two changes.
That would be awesome, we've had a couple of
Ritesh Nadhani wrote:
For one, I would be interested. We use Bazaar and and have been slowly
trying to intergrate ReviewBoard in our system. I looked into the
post-review and it does not seem to support Bazaar. I have already
extended it using the Mercurial example and override two or three
sailor...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried a couple of days on FC4, but I still can not let reviewboard
work for subversion repository.
The main reason is pysvn..
I guess if someone can provide some simple way to install, it will
help reviewboard is used by more guys.Maybe, specific versoin
Vesterbaek wrote:
I would find it useful to to be able to configure this independently
for groups and people, such that a user can choose to be member of a
particular group, but not receive any emails from review requests to
that group, but only get emails if a review request is directed at
If you want to deploy post-review with some site specific customizations
(e.g. add support for a custom in house SCM) there are only a few options:
* Privately fork post-review and try and sync all the changes that
occur in trunk into your version
* add a wrapper script around
Phil wrote:
.Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database file.
(sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file)
Has anyone else had this problem? My understanding is that Python 2.5
includes sqlite thus I wouldn't have to install it again -- is this
incorrect? Have
Tee - your best bet is to just get stuck in and play :-)
I've not come across any docs other than what is in the code, I ended up
setting up a reviewboard server to svn and seeing what it did as well as
creating an empty NEWscmtool that subclasses SCMTool and adding methods
as they were
bart wrote:
However I am having some problems regarding C/C++ highlighting.
Generally the highlighting appears to be on but for some keywords that
are highlighted by pygmentize program I am not able to see highlight
in the review diff... I tried to turn on the guess option in
diffutils.py
I've just moved to rev 1623 in trunk (I was at 1519). I do like the new
manual upgrade required screen that pops up (settings.py has been
updated to change the location for htdocs/media/uploaded/images). Very
slick and should saves lots of admin hair pulling :-)
However when I first loaded
AndyP wrote:
I installed the latest stuff (blew everything away first) and can't
find the latest version of the post-review tool. Where do I go to get
it?
You can pull it down from svn (and you can even use wget if you don't
have svn to hand):
Russell Bryant wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Dave Hocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use the Perforce p4 files command to determine if Perforce
thinks the file is text or binary. The last token of the output will
be something like (text)
fts1050 wrote:
To remedy this..any chance Post Review can be modified to handle an
external file that contain a list of specific files that should be
included in the review? I can do this myself but then when I upgrade I
have to manage my own version of post review and that's no fun. Just a
You won't like the answer use apache.
I reported a similar problem in the faq (with solution)
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/FAQ
I think this is another manifestation. If this is the case do you could
you add a comment to the faq too?
Also see
On 10/13/2008 8:38 AM, Jay wrote:
If I want to add another scmtool support, is it enough to add a new
file in scmtools folder like anotherscmtool.py which will implements
several classes and methold? Or any change in other module?
I can confirm that this is pretty much what you have to do
On 10/8/2008 1:38 AM, Marcos wrote:
I am using Perforce.
The error is with tga files.
I'm not a Perforce user so dumb question coming.
Does Perforce have the concept of binary files? Can this information be
picked up from Perforce (I notice a describe is done before the diffs
are
On 10/8/2008 3:45 PM, Paulo Eduardo Neves wrote:
..
my problem with cygwin is that I'll have to deploy the client in
dozens of developer Windows machines. I don't want to force everybody
to install cygwin just to have diff.
Don't forget that the patch requirement is only on the
On 10/8/2008 4:21 PM, Paulo Eduardo Neves wrote:
I've already did some patch uploads through the web interface, but now
when I try to upload a diff generated by subversion nothing happens.
My steps:
1) generate diff with this command:
svn diff -r 15854:15855 e:\revision15855.patch
2)
95 matches
Mail list logo
